Correlation of immunoblot type, enterotoxin production, and cytotoxin production with clinical manifestations of Clostridium difficile infection in a cohort of hospitalized patients

Clostridioides difficile Colitis

Clostridioides difficile colitis is an important source of hospital-acquired diarrhea associated with antibiotic use. Symptoms are profuse watery diarrhea, typically following a course of antibiotics; however, some cases of fulminant disease may manifest with shock, ileus, or megacolon. Nonfulminant colitis is treated with oral fidaxomicin. C difficile colitis has a high potential for recurrence, and recurrent episodes are also treated with fidaxomicin. Bezlotoxumab is another medication that may be used in populations at high risk for further recurrence. Fulminant disease is treated with maximal medical therapy and early surgical consultation. Antibiotic stewardship is critical to preventing C difficile colitis.

Detection of Free Toxin B in the Stool of Asymptomatic Clostridioides difficile Carriers by the Cell Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay

Cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) is considered to be a gold standard to diagnose Clostridioides difficile infections. We performed CCNA on 77 consecutive admission screening rectal swabs from asymptomatic toxigenic C. difficile carriers. Thirty-nine percent of specimens from asymptomatic carriers were positive. Thus, CCNA specificity may be lower than previously thought.

A multicentre analysis of Clostridium difficile in persons with Cystic Fibrosis demonstrates that carriage may be transient and highly variable with respect to strain and level

PURPOSE

Clostridium difficile has been reported to occur in the gastrointestinal tract of 50% of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) subjects, however, clinical C. difficile infection (CDI) is a rare occurrence in this cohort despite the presence of toxigenic and hypervirulent ribotypes. Here, we present the first longitudinal, multicentre analysis of C. difficile prevalence among adult CF subjects.

METHODOLOGY

Faecal samples were collected from adults with CF (selected based on confirmed Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary colonisation) from Ireland, UK and Belgium as part of the CFMATTERS clinical research trial (grant No. 603038) and from non-CF controls. Faecal samples were collected on enrolment, at three monthly intervals, during pulmonary exacerbation and three months post exacerbation. C. difficile was isolated from faecal samples by ethanol shocking followed by culturing on cycloserine cefoxitin egg yolk agar. Isolates were characterised in terms of ribotype, toxin type and antibiotic susceptibility to antibiotics routinely used in the treatment of CDI (metronidazole and vancomycin) and those implicated in induction of CDI (ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin).

RESULTS

Prevalence of C. difficile among CF subjects in the three sites was similar ranging from 47% to 50% at baseline, while the healthy control cohort had a carriage rate of 7.1%. Including subjects who were positive for C. difficile at any time point there was a higher carriage rate of 71.4%, 66.7% and 63.2% in Ireland, UK, and Belgium, respectively. Ribotyping of 80 isolates from 45 CF persons, over multiple time points revealed 23 distinct ribotypes with two ribotypes (046 and 078) shared by all centres. The proportion of toxigenic isolates varied across the sites, ranging from 66.7% in Ireland to 52.9% in Belgium and 100% in the UK. Antibiotic susceptibility rates to vancomycin, metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin was 100%, 97.5%, 1.3% and 63.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the highest carriage rate of C. difficile to date in a CF cohort. Longitudinal data show that C. difficile can be a transient inhabitant of the CF gut, changing both in terms of strain and excretion rates.

Predictors of Clostridioides difficile Infection Among Asymptomatic, Colonized Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Asymptomatic patients colonized with Clostridioides difficile are at risk of developing C. difficile infection (CDI), but the factors associated with disease onset are poorly understood. Our aims were to identify predictors of hospital-onset CDI (HO-CDI) among colonized patients and to explore the potential benefits of primary prophylaxis to prevent CDI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic institution. Colonized patients were identified by detecting the tcdB gene by polymerase chain reaction on a rectal swab. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of HO-CDI.

RESULTS

There were 19 112 patients screened, from which 960 (5%) colonized patients were identified: 513 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 39 (7.6%) developed a HO-CDI, with a 30-day attributable mortality of 15%. An increasing length of stay (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per day, 1.03; P = .006), exposure to multiple classes of antibiotics (aOR per class, 1.45; P = .02), use of opioids (aOR, 2.78; P = .007), and cirrhosis (aOR 5.49; P = .008) were independently associated with increased risks of HO-CDI, whereas the use of laxatives was associated with a lower risk of CDI (aOR 0.36; P = .01). Among the antimicrobials, B-lactam with B-lactamase inhibitors (OR 3.65; P < .001), first-generation cephalosporins (OR 2.38; P = .03), and carbapenems (OR 2.44; P = .03) correlated with the greatest risk of HO-CDI. By contrast, patient age, the use of proton pump inhibitors, and the use of primary prophylaxis were not significant predictors of HO-CDI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies several factors that are associated with CDI among colonized patients. Whether modifying these variables could decrease the risk of CDI should be investigated.

A 2-step algorithm combining glutamate dehydrogenase and nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of Clostridioides difficile in stool specimens

The optimized diagnosis algorithm of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is worldwide concerns. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxigenic C. difficile test performance and propose an optimal laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of CDI in mild virulent epidemic areas. Diarrhea samples collected from patients were analyzed by glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), toxin AB (CDAB), and nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). We assessed the performance of GDH, the GDH-CDAB algorithm, and the GDH-NAAT algorithm using toxigenic culture (TC) as a reference method. In this study, 186 diarrhea samples were collected. The numbers of TC-positive and TC-negative samples were 39 and 147, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa of the GDH assay were 100%, 80.3%, 57.4%, 100%, and 0.63; of the GDH-CDAB algorithm were 48.7%, 97.3%, 82.6%, 87.7%, and 0.54; and of the GDH-NAAT algorithm were 74.4%, 100%, 100%, 93.6%, and 0.82, respectively. The GDH-NAAT algorithm has great concordance with TC in detecting toxigenic C. difficile (kappa = 0.82), while the sensitivity of the GDH-CDAB algorithm was too low to meet the demand of CDI diagnosis clinically. GDH-NAAT algorithm is recommended for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile with high specificity, increased sensitivity, and cost-effective.

Comparison of Clostridioides difficile Stool Toxin Concentrations in Adults With Symptomatic Infection and Asymptomatic Carriage Using an Ultrasensitive Quantitative Immunoassay

Background

We used an ultrasensitive, quantitative single molecule array (Simoa) immunoassay to test whether concentrations of Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile toxins A and/or B in the stool of adult inpatients with C. difficile infection (CDI) were higher than in asymptomatic carriers of toxinogenic C. difficile.

Methods

Patients enrolled as CDI-NAAT had clinically significant diarrhea and a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), per US guidelines, and received CDI treatment. Potential carriers had recently received antibiotics and did not have diarrhea; positive NAAT confirmed carriage. Baseline stool samples were tested by Simoa for toxin A and B.

Results

Stool toxin concentrations in both CDI-NAAT (n = 122) and carrier-NAAT (n = 44) cohorts spanned 5 logs (0 pg/mL to >100000 pg/mL). Seventy-nine of 122 (65%) CDI-NAAT and 34 of 44 (77%) carrier-NAAT had toxin A + B concentration ≥20 pg/mL (clinical cutoff). Median toxin A, toxin B, toxin A + B, and NAAT cycle threshold (Ct) values in CDI-NAAT and carrier-NAAT cohorts were similar (toxin A, 50.6 vs 60.0 pg/mL, P = .958; toxin B, 89.5 vs 42.3 pg/mL, P = .788; toxin A + B, 197.2 vs 137.3 pg/mL, P = .766; Ct, 28.1 vs 28.6, P = .354). However, when CDI/carrier cohorts were limited to those with detectable toxin, respective medians were significantly different (A: 874.0 vs 129.7, P = .021; B: 1317.0 vs 81.7, P = .003, A + B, 4180.7 vs 349.6, P = .004; Ct, 25.8 vs 27.7, P = .015).

Conclusions

Toxin concentration did not differentiate an individual with CDI from one with asymptomatic carriage. Median stool toxin concentrations in groups with CDI vs carriage differed, but only when groups were defined by detectable stool toxin (vs positive NAAT).

Prevalence of Clostridium Difficile-Associated Diarrhoea in Hospitalised Patients (Results of a Russian Prospective Multicentre Study)

Introduction

The objective of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) among hospitalised patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD) in general and by specific types of medical care and hospital units.

Methods

A prospective, cross-sectional, non-interventional, multicentre study. The main inclusion criteria were: patient age ≥ 18 years, hospital stay of at least 48 h, current antibiotic therapy or antibiotic therapy within the previous 30 days, loose stools (Bristol stool types 5–7 and stool frequency ≥ 3 within ≤ 24 consecutive hours or exceeding normal for the patient) and signed informed consent form. The stool sample was taken to the local (study site) microbiology laboratory for detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxins A/B using enzyme immunoassay (EIA) stool test.

Results

From April 2016 to April 2017, a total of 1245 patients from 12 large hospitals were enrolled in the study. Data on 81 patients were excluded from the analysis for different reasons. Data on 1164 patients (45.2% males and 54.8% females) with a mean age of 54.9 years (range 18–95 years) were analysed. Length of hospitalisation was 2–188 days (median, 8 days). The EIA stool test showed CDAD-positive results in 21.7% (253/1164) patients. The patients were from surgery units (546/1164), internal medicine units (510/1164) and intensive care units (108/1164). The prevalence of CDAD among patients from surgery, internal medicine and intensive care units was 26.2, 17.8 and 17.6%, respectively. Oncology, gastroenterology, septic surgery, oncohaematology and general medical hospital units accounted for more than 75% of all patients included; the prevalence of CDAD by those hospital units was 11.3, 15.0, 39.2, 17.6, and 27.2%, respectively. The proportion of GDH-positive and toxin A/B-negative patients by the rapid stool test result was 16.8% (196/1164). The prevalence of CDAD varied widely between the hospitals (from 0 to 44.3%).

Conclusions

The prevalence of CDAD among hospitalised patients with AAD in this study was 21.7% (95% confidence interval: 14.8 and 28.7%). The percentage of CDAD varied widely between hospitals and by specific types of medical care and hospital units.

Clostridium difficile - From Colonization to Infection

Clostridium difficile is the most frequent cause of nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The incidence of C. difficile infection (CDI) has been rising worldwide with subsequent increases in morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile is common and a high prevalence has been found in specific cohorts, e.g., hospitalized patients, adults in nursing homes and in infants. However, the risk of infection with C. difficile differs significantly between these cohorts. While CDI is a clear indication for therapy, colonization with C. difficile is not believed to be a direct precursor for CDI and therefore does not require treatment. Antibiotic therapy causes alterations of the intestinal microbial composition, enabling C. difficile colonization and consecutive toxin production leading to disruption of the colonic epithelial cells. Clinical symptoms of CDI range from mild diarrhea to potentially life-threatening conditions like pseudomembranous colitis or toxic megacolon. While antibiotics are still the treatment of choice for CDI, new therapies have emerged in recent years such as antibodies against C. difficile toxin B and fecal microbial transfer (FMT). This specific therapy for CDI underscores the role of the indigenous bacterial composition in the prevention of the disease in healthy individuals and its role in the pathogenesis after alteration by antibiotic treatment. In addition to the pathogenesis of CDI, this review focuses on the colonization of C. difficile in the human gut and factors promoting CDI.

Clostridium difficile - From Colonization to Infection

Clostridium difficile is the most frequent cause of nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The incidence of C. difficile infection (CDI) has been rising worldwide with subsequent increases in morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Asymptomatic colonization with C. difficile is common and a high prevalence has been found in specific cohorts, e.g., hospitalized patients, adults in nursing homes and in infants. However, the risk of infection with C. difficile differs significantly between these cohorts. While CDI is a clear indication for therapy, colonization with C. difficile is not believed to be a direct precursor for CDI and therefore does not require treatment. Antibiotic therapy causes alterations of the intestinal microbial composition, enabling C. difficile colonization and consecutive toxin production leading to disruption of the colonic epithelial cells. Clinical symptoms of CDI range from mild diarrhea to potentially life-threatening conditions like pseudomembranous colitis or toxic megacolon. While antibiotics are still the treatment of choice for CDI, new therapies have emerged in recent years such as antibodies against C. difficile toxin B and fecal microbial transfer (FMT). This specific therapy for CDI underscores the role of the indigenous bacterial composition in the prevention of the disease in healthy individuals and its role in the pathogenesis after alteration by antibiotic treatment. In addition to the pathogenesis of CDI, this review focuses on the colonization of C. difficile in the human gut and factors promoting CDI.

Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?

INTRODUCTIONIn 2010, we published an initial Point-Counterpoint on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). At that time, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) were just becoming commercially available, and the idea of algorithmic approaches to CDI was being explored. Now, there are numerous NAATs in the marketplace, and based on recent proficiency test surveys, they have become the predominant method used for CDI diagnosis in the United States. At the same time, there is a body of literature that suggests that NAATs lack clinical specificity and thus inflate CDI rates. Hospital administrators are taking note of institutional CDI rates because they are publicly reported. They have become an important metric impacting hospital safety ratings and value-based purchasing; hospitals may have millions of dollars of reimbursement at risk. In this Point-Counterpoint using a frequently asked question approach, Ferric Fang of the University of Washington, who has been a consistent advocate for a NAAT-only approach for CDI diagnosis, will discuss the value of a NAAT-only approach, while Christopher Polage of the University of California Davis and Mark Wilcox of Leeds University, Leeds, United Kingdom, each of whom has recently written important articles on the value of toxin detection in the diagnosis, will discuss the impact of toxin detection in CDI diagnosis.

Infection Prevention and Control Issues After Solid Organ Transplantation

Infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Consequently, infection prevention is an essential component of any organ transplant program. Given their frequent and often prolonged contact with the healthcare system, solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for healthcare-associated infections, including those caused by antibiotic-resistant organisms. In this chapter we review several different healthcare-associated infections of importance to transplant recipients, including those caused by bacterial, viral, and fungal organisms. We also describe infection prevention and control strategies applicable to this patient population. These practices focus on clinical interventions and environmental controls designed to prevent the spread of potentially pathogenic organisms in the healthcare setting. We also describe post-exposure interventions applicable to solid organ transplant recipients exposed to potential pathogens in order to reduce their risk of subsequent infection.

Fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis: a complication of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis

Antibiotic prophylaxis for maxillofacial surgical wounds remains common practice. Surgeons must weigh the risks (e.g., Clostridium difficile colitis) against the benefits before administering antibiotics for any reason and the relative risk and morbidity of C difficile colitis against those of a potential postoperative wound infection. In addition, the possibility of C difficile infection as a complication of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis should be discussed with patients before surgery, especially those with concomitant baseline risk factors. This report describes the case of a young healthy patient with few risk factors for C difficile infection who received a standard perioperative course of antibiotic therapy. Subsequently, the patient developed severe fulminant C difficile infection that required a protracted hospital admission, subtotal colectomy, and ileostomy. This case underscores that antibiotic prophylaxis continues in widespread use and is not benign therapy.

Effect of biotherapeutics on antitoxin IgG in experimentally induced Clostridium difficile infection

PURPOSE

Recurrent diarrhoea after successful treatment of primary Clostridium difficile associated disease (CDAD) occurs due to bowel flora alterations and failure to mount an effective antibody response. Apart from antibiotics, risk factors include immunosuppressive and acid-suppressive drug administration. Biotherapeutics such as probiotic and epidermal growth factor (EGF) may offer potential effective therapy for CDAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effect of biotherapeutics in mounting an antibody response against C. difficile toxins was studied in BALB/c mice challenged with C. difficile after pre-treatment with ampicillin, lansoprazole or cyclosporin. Sera from sacrificed animals were estimated for antitoxin IgG by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Antitoxin IgG was significantly higher (P<0.05) in C. difficile challenged groups compared to unchallenged controls, but insignificant (P>0.05) in animals in which C. difficile was given after pre-treatment with cyclosporin compared to those without any pre-treatment, or pre-treatment with antibiotic or lansoprazole. In inter-subgroup comparisons also significant anomaly in production of antitoxin IgG was found. The antitoxin IgG levels were raised in animals administered C. difficile after pre-treatment with ampicillin, but lower in animals administered cyclosporin. High levels of antitoxin IgG were also found in the serum samples of animals receiving lansoprazole and C. difficile.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotics showed their beneficial effect by boosting the immune response as seen by production of antitoxin IgG. Oral administration of EGF did not affect the immune response to C. difficile toxins as significant increase was not observed in the serum antitoxin IgG levels in any of the groups investigated.

Clostridium difficile infection in non-HIV-immunocompromised patients and in HIV-infected patients

Clostridium difficile infection is a common cause of morbidity in patients with HIV infection and in patients with non-HIV immune deficiency. The frequency of C. difficile--associated diarrhea (CDAD) seen in these two patient populations has been attributed to immune deficiency, as well as to increased exposure to hospital environments and antibiotic therapy, both of which are major risk factors for CDAD. This article reviews recent data useful in the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of C. difficile infection in these patient groups. Recent publications relating to C. difficile infection in specific immunocompromised conditions are also discussed.

Esomeprazole for the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding

Peptic ulcer bleeding is the most common cause of acute bleeding in the upper GI tract. The incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding has slowly decreased and endoscopic treatment options have improved; nevertheless, it remains a very common condition with a 7-15% mortality. Acidic environments have a negative effect on hemostasis. Therefore, acid inhibitors have been applied in the adjuvant treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding, both in preventing rebleeding and in treating the underlying cause. This requires profound acid suppressive therapy aiming for a rapid onset of effect and a persistent intragastric pH above 6. This can only be achieved by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Esomeprazole is the S-isomer of omeprazole, and the first PPI to consist of only the active isomer. A number of studies have compared esomeprazole with other PPIs, demonstrating a faster and more persistent increase in intragastric pH with the use of esomeprazole than with other agents. Continuous high-dose intravenous treatment with esomeprazole decreases rebleeding, surgery, transfusion rates and hospital days in peptic ulcer bleeding.

What is the current role of algorithmic approaches for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection?

With the recognition of several serious outbreaks of Clostridium difficile infection in the industrialized world coupled with the development of new testing technologies for detection of this organism, there has been renewed interest in the laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile infection. Two factors seem to have driven much of this interest. First, the recognition that immunoassays for detection of C. difficile toxins A and B, for many years the most widely used tests for C. difficile infection diagnosis, were perhaps not as sensitive as previously believed at a time when attributed deaths to C. difficile infections were showing a remarkable rise. Second, the availability of FDA-approved commercial and laboratory-developed PCR assays which could detect toxigenic strains of C. difficile provided a novel and promising testing approach for diagnosing this infection. In this point-counterpoint on the laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile infection, we have asked two experts in C. difficile infection diagnosis, Ferric Fang, who has recently published two articles in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology advocating the use of PCR as a standalone test (see this author's references 12 and 28), and Mark Wilcox, who played a key role in developing the IDSA/SHEA guidelines on Clostridium difficile infection (see Wilcox and Planche's reference 1), along with his colleague, Tim Planche, to address the following question: what is the current role of algorithmic approaches to the diagnosis of C. difficile infection?

Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile

Clostridium difficile is the most common infectious cause of diarrhea in hospitalized patients. The optimal approach for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile remains controversial because no single test is sensitive, specific, and affordable. We have developed a real-time PCR method (direct stool PCR [DPCR]) to detect the tcdB gene encoding toxin B directly from stool specimens and have combined it with enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) in a three-step protocol. DPCR was performed on 699 specimens that were positive for C. difficile glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) by Wampole C Diff Quik Chek EIA (GDH-Q) and negative for toxins A and B by Wampole Tox A/B Quik Chek EIA (AB-Q), performed sequentially. The performance of this three-step algorithm was compared with a modified "gold standard" that combined tissue culture cytotoxicity (CYT) and DPCR. A separate investigation was performed to evaluate the sensitivity of the GDH-Q as a screening test, and toxigenic C. difficile was found in 1.9% of 211 GDH-Q-negative specimens. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, were as follows for an algorithm combining GDH-Q, AB-Q, and DPCR: 83.8%, 99.7%, 97.1%, and 97.9%. Those for CYT alone were 58.8%, 100%, 100%, and 94.9%, respectively. In comparison, the sensitivity and specificity of DPCR were estimated to be 97.5% and 99.7%, respectively, using the same modified gold standard. Neither CYT nor toxin EIA was sufficiently sensitive to exclude toxigenic C. difficile, and combining EIAs with CYT in a three-step algorithm failed to substantially improve sensitivity. DPCR is a sensitive and specific method for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile that can provide same-day results at a cost-per-positive test comparable to those of other methods. A three-step algorithm in which DPCR is used to analyze GDH EIA-positive, toxin EIA-negative specimens provides a convenient and specific alternative with rapid results for 87.7% of specimens, although this approach is less sensitive than performing DPCR on all specimens.

Tolevamer is not efficacious in the neutralization of cytotoxin in a human gut model of Clostridium difficile infection

The efficacy of tolevamer, a nonantimicrobial styrene derivative toxin-binding agent, in treating simulated Clostridium difficile infection in an in vitro human gut model was investigated. Tolevamer reduced neither the duration nor magnitude of cytotoxin activity by C. difficile, reflecting poor efficacy observed in recent phase III clinical trials.

Esomeprazole: a proton pump inhibitor

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most potent inhibitors of gastric acid secretion available, and they are effective for treating all acid-related disorders. Esomeprazole is one of several most recent PPIs that became available to the market in 2001. Esomeprazole is indicated for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults and children, risk reduction of NSAIDs-associated gastric ulcer, Helicobacter pylori eradication and control of pathological hypersecretory conditions associated with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Esomeprazole is available in both oral and intravenous formulations. A number of studies have compared esomeprazole with other PPIs. While differences supporting esomeprazole have been reported, the magnitude of differences has been variable and of uncertain clinical importance. Cost plays a major role in prescribing patterns of PPIs.

Clostridium difficile toxin synthesis is negatively regulated by TcdC

Clostridium difficile toxin synthesis is growth phase-dependent and is regulated by various environmental signals. The toxin genes tcdA and tcdB are located in a pathogenicity locus, which also includes three accessory genes, tcdR, tcdC and tcdE. TcdR has been shown to act as an alternative σ factor that mediates positive regulation of both the toxin genes and its own gene. The tcdA, tcdB and tcdR genes are transcribed during the stationary growth phase. The tcdC gene, however, is expressed during exponential phase. This expression pattern suggested that TcdC may act as a negative regulator of toxin gene expression. TcdC is a small acidic protein without any conserved DNA-binding motif. It is able to form dimers and its N-terminal region includes a putative transmembrane domain. Genetic and biochemical evidence showed that TcdC negatively regulates C. difficile toxin synthesis by interfering with the ability of TcdR-containing RNA polymerase to recognize the tcdA and tcdB promoters. In addition, the C. difficile NAP1/027 epidemic strains that produce higher levels of toxins have mutations in tcdC. Interestingly, a frameshift mutation at position 117 of the tcdC coding sequence seems to be, at least in part, responsible for the hypertoxigenicity phenotype of these epidemic strains.

Tolevamer, an anionic polymer, neutralizes toxins produced by the BI/027 strains of Clostridium difficile

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is caused by the toxins the organism produces when it overgrows in the colon as a consequence of antibiotic depletion of normal flora. Conventional antibiotic treatment of CDAD increases the likelihood of recurrent disease by again suppressing normal bacterial flora. Tolevamer, a novel toxin-binding polymer, was developed to ameliorate the disease without adversely affecting normal flora. In the current study, tolevamer was tested for its ability to neutralize clostridial toxins produced by the epidemic BI/027 strains, thereby preventing toxin-mediated tissue culture cell rounding. The titers of toxin-containing C. difficile culture supernatants were determined using confluent cell monolayers, and then the supernatants were used in assays containing dilutions of tolevamer to determine the lowest concentration of tolevamer that prevented > or =90% cytotoxicity. Tolevamer neutralized toxins in the supernatants of all C. difficile strains tested. Specific antibodies against the large clostridial toxins TcdA and TcdB also neutralized the cytopathic effect, suggesting that tolevamer is specifically neutralizing these toxins and that the binary toxin (whose genes are carried by the BI/027 strains) is not a significant source of cytopathology against tissue culture cells in vitro.

Do fluoroquinolones predispose patients to Clostridium difficile associated disease? A review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) is an important cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea, and increasingly of community-acquired diarrhea. The occurrence of CDAD in the hospitalized patient is associated with increased length of stay, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Exposure to antimicrobials is the single most important predisposing factor for acquiring CDAD. The data suggesting that fluoroquinolones are an important risk factor for CDAD is becoming stronger. Also, different fluoroquinolones may pose different risks for CDAD development.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this commentary is to summarize the literature as it relates to the role that fluoroquinolones may have in CDAD.

METHODS

PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE were searched using the terms fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin in combination with C. difficile, CDAD, pseudomembranous colitis and antibiotic associated diarrhea.

RESULTS

The evidence for an association between fluoroquinolone use and CDAD, especially CDAD due to the hypervirulent NAP1 strain or the polymerase chain reaction ribotype 027, is becoming stronger.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroquinolones appear to predispose patients to CDAD. The data are suggestive but not conclusive. More studies are needed to define the role that fluoroquinolones play in the development of CDAD. Meticulous and enhanced infection control practices at all times and the judicious use of antimicrobials will help contain the epidemic of CDAD.

Clostridium difficile small-bowel enteritis after total proctocolectomy: a rare but fatal, easily missed diagnosis. Report of a case

PURPOSE

Clostridium difficile enteritis is a rare infection, with less than a dozen cases reported in the literature. We present a case of a patient with total proctocolectomy and ileostomy, developing Clostridium difficile infection of small bowel. We discuss the role of Clostridium difficile toxins and review previously reported cases of Clostridium difficile enteritis after total colectomy.

METHODS

A 65-year-old male with a history of total proctocolectomy and ileostomy 30 years previously had purulent ileostomy drainage and septic shock. The patient was recently treated with intravenous piperacillin, tazobactam, and levofloxacin for aspiration pneumonia in the previous admission. Ileostomy stool cultures tested positive for Clostridium difficile toxin A, and the patient was promptly treated with intravenous metronidazole.

RESULTS

The patient was aggressively resuscitated and treated, recovered from the enteritis and shock, but died of pulmonary complications after a prolonged hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of previously reported cases of Clostridium difficile enteritis showed a high mortality rate. We attribute this to delayed diagnosis secondary to rarity of this illness. Some patients were diagnosed only after pseudomembranes in small-bowel segments were found at autopsy. This rare disease entity is firmly established among the differential diagnosis to clinicians treating patients with total proctocolectomy.

Implications of the changing face of Clostridium difficile disease for health care practitioners

Recent reported outbreaks of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Canada have changed the profile of C difficile infections. Historically, C difficile disease was thought of mainly as a nosocomial disease associated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, and the disease was usually not life threatening. The emergence of an epidemic strain, BI/NAP1/027, which produces a binary toxin in addition to the 2 classic C difficile toxins A and B and is resistant to some fluoroquinolones, was associated with large numbers of cases with high rates of mortality. Recently, C difficile has been reported more frequently in nonhospital-based settings, such as community-acquired cases. The C difficile disease is also being reported in populations once considered of low risk (children and young healthy women). In addition, poor response to metronidazole treatment is increasing. Faced with an increasing incidence of C difficile infections and the changing profile of patients who become infected, this paper will reexamine the current concepts on the epidemiology and treatment of C difficile-associated disease, present new hypotheses for risk factors, examine the role of spores in the transmission of C difficile, and provide recommendations that may enhance infection control practices.

Review article: tolevamer, a novel toxin-binding polymer: overview of preclinical pharmacology and physicochemical properties

BACKGROUND

Tolevamer is a novel toxin-binding polymer that is currently being investigated in clinical trials for the treatment of patients who have Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea.

AIMS

To summarize the results of in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies of tolevamer. In contrast to antibiotics, tolevamer binds C. difficile toxins to interrupt toxin-mediated intestinal inflammation and tissue damage, and does not demonstrate direct antimicrobial activity.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics were studied in rats and dogs; efficacy was studied in a hamster model.

RESULTS

Studies in rats and dogs indicate that tolevamer is essentially non-absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and show that drug interactions with commonly used therapies are unlikely. Pharmacologic studies indicate that tolevamer reduces disease severity and recurrence rates in the hamster model of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea and blocks the enterotoxic effects of toxin A in rat ileum. The binding parameters calculated for the interaction of tolevamer with toxins A and B provide a reasonable physicochemical model that supports the potential clinical utility of tolevamer.

CONCLUSIONS

These preclinical results are consistent with the effectiveness and safety profile of tolevamer observed in clinical studies in patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhoea.

Correlation of disease severity with fecal toxin levels in patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and distribution of PCR ribotypes and toxin yields in vitro of corresponding isolates

We investigated in vivo and in vitro yields of toxins A and B from and PCR ribotypes of Clostridium difficile isolates from 164 patients with differing severities of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) (patients were grouped as follows: <3 loose stools per day, n = 45; 3 to 10 per day, n = 97; >10 per day, n = 22). The median fecal toxin levels in each group were 0.5, 6.8, and 149 U/g feces (P < 0.001), respectively. Patients with severe diarrhea also had more-frequent occurrence of blood in stool and vomiting, but there was no association with fecal toxin levels per se. There was no correlation between fecal toxin level and toxin yield in vitro for the corresponding C. difficile isolate or between its PCR ribotype and disease severity. A broad range of toxin yields among isolates belonging to major PCR ribotypes indicated a presence of many subtypes. We hypothesize that bacterial and host factors that affect C. difficile toxin levels in feces are important determinants of symptoms in CDAD patients. An inverse correlation between toxin yield and spore count (r = 0.66) in stationary-phase cultures supported the notion that toxin production and sporulation represent opposite alternative survival strategies for C. difficile cells facing nutrient shortage.

Toxin binding of tolevamer, a polyanionic drug that protects against antibiotic-associated diarrhea

Tolevamer, (GT160-246), is a sodium salt of styrene sulfonate polymer that is under development for the treatment of diarrhea caused by infection with Clostridium difficile. Pulsed ultrafiltration binding experiments in phosphate buffer containing 0.15 M Na(+) provide per polymer chain dissociation constants of 133 nM and 8.7 microM for the binding of tolevamer to C. difficile toxins A and B, respectively. At 0.05 M Na(+), the binding of toxin A to tolevamer is irreversible, whereas the dissociation constant to toxin B under these conditions is 120 nM. Binding constants obtained from fluorescence polarization data for toxin A binding to tolevamer at 0.15 M Na(+) agree substantially with those obtained by pulsed ultrafiltration. The binding activity of tolevamer reported here correlates well with previously reported results for the inhibition of the biological activity of C. difficile toxins A and B. From the fluorescence polarization data, it is estimated that one toxin A molecule interacts with between 600 to 1000 monomer units on tolevamer at 0.15 M Na(+). Thus, the data suggest a very large interaction surface between polymer and toxin A.

Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium difficile and serum levels of IgG antibody against toxin A

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection can result in asymptomatic carriage, mild diarrhea, or fulminant pseudomembranous colitis. We studied whether antibody responses to C. difficile toxins affect the risks of colonization, diarrhea, and asymptomatic carriage.

METHODS

We prospectively studied C. difficile infections in hospitalized patients who were receiving antibiotics. Serial stool samples were tested for C. difficile colonization by cytotoxin assay and culture. Serum antibody (IgA, IgG, and IgM) levels and fecal antibody (IgA and IgG) levels against C. difficile toxin A, toxin B, and nontoxin antigens were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Of 271 patients, 37 (14 percent) were colonized with C. difficile at the time of admission, 18 of whom were asymptomatic carriers. An additional 47 patients (17 percent) became infected in the hospital, 19 of whom remained asymptomatic. The baseline antibody levels were similar in the patients who later became colonized and those who did not. After colonization, those who became asymptomatic carriers had significantly greater increases in serum levels of IgG antibody against toxin A than did the patients in whom C. difficile diarrhea developed (P<0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for diarrhea was 48.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 3.4 to 678) among patients with colonization who had a serum level of IgG antibody against toxin A of 3.00 ELISA units or less, as compared with patients with colonization who had a level of more than 3.00 ELISA units.

CONCLUSIONS

We find no evidence of immune protection against colonization by C. difficile. However, after colonization there is an association between a systemic anamnestic response to toxin A, as evidenced by increased serum levels of IgG antibody against toxin A, and asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis

OBJECTIVES

To review and summarize the status of diagnosis, epidemiology, infection control, and treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD).

DIAGNOSIS

A case definition of CDAD should include the presence of symptoms (usually diarrhea) and at least one of the following positive tests: endoscopy revealing pseudomembranes, stool cytotoxicity test for toxin B, stool enzyme immunoassay for toxin A or B, or stool culture for C difficile (preferably with confirmation of organism toxicity if a direct stool toxin test is negative or not done). Testing of asymptomatic patients, including those who are asymptomatic after treatment, is not recommended other than for epidemiologic purposes. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is the only diagnostic test for pseudomembranous colitis, but it is expensive, invasive, and insensitive (51% to 55%) for the diagnosis of CDAD. Stool culture is the most sensitive laboratory test currently in clinical use, but it is not as specific as the cell cytotoxicity assay.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

C difficile is the most frequently identified cause of nosocomial diarrhea. The majority of C difficile infections are acquired nosocomially, and most patients remain asymptomatic following acquisition. Antimicrobial exposure is the greatest risk factor for patients, especially clindamycin, cephalosporins, and penicillins, although virtually every antimicrobial has been implicated. Cases of CDAD unassociated with prior antimicrobial or antineoplastic use are very rare. Hands of personnel, as well as a variety of environmental sites within institutions, have been found to be contaminated with C difficile, which can persist as spores for many months. Contaminated commodes, bathing tubs, and electronic thermometers have been implicated as sources of C difficile. Symptomatic and asymptomatic infected patients are the major reservoirs and sources for environmental contamination. Both genotypic and phenotypic typing systems for C difficile are available and have enhanced epidemiologic investigation greatly.

INFECTION CONTROL

Successful infection control measures designed to prevent horizontal transmission include the use of gloves in handling body substances and replacement of electronic thermometers with disposable devices. Isolation, cohorting, handwashing, environmental disinfection, and treatment of asymptomatic carriers are recommended practices for which convincing data of efficacy are not available. The most successful control measure directed at reduction in symptomatic disease has been antimicrobial restriction.

TREATMENT

Treatment of symptomatic (but not asymptomatic) patients with metronidazole or vancomycin for 10 days is effective; metronidazole may be preferred to reduce risk of vancomycin resistance among other organisms in hospitals. Recurrence of symptoms occurs in 7% to 20% of patients and is due to both relapse and reinfection. Over 90% of first recurrences can be treated successfully in the same manner as initial cases. Combination treatment with vancomycin plus rifampin or the addition orally of the yeast Saccharomyces boulardii to vancomycin or metronidazole treatment has been shown to prevent subsequent diarrhea in patients with recurrent disease.

Comparison of arbitrarily primed PCR with restriction endonuclease and immunoblot analyses for typing Clostridium difficile isolates

Arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) was used to genotype 26 clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile previously analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) and 20 isolates typed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) with HindIII. Two levels of differentiation were achieved with the AP-PCR approach by use of two different arbitrary primers. With the 19-mer arbitrary primer T-7 (first level of differentiation), a good correlation was found between IB and AP-PCR typing. Twenty isolates grouped into six IB types were separated into seven major AP-PCR types. These seven AP-PCR groups were further discriminated into 12 subtypes after genotyping with the arbitrary primer PG-05 (second level of differentiation). The remaining six isolates, all of different IB types, showed a unique and distinct DNA banding pattern with both of the arbitrary primers, T-7 and PG-05. Twenty isolates representing 20 REA types from 15 REA groups were resolved into 13 AP-PCR DNA profiles with the arbitrary primer T-7. A good correlation was found at this level of differentiation between the major REA groups, Y and M, and AP-PCR typing. While AP-PCR with this primer failed to differentiate isolates in REA groups J, G, R, and B, AP-PCR with PG-05 resolved these four isolates into four distinct AP-PCR types. In addition, one of three M strains and one of four Y strains displayed a slightly different DNA banding pattern by AP-PCR (with PG-05) from that of the other strains in the group. We conclude that AP-PCR is a rapid and sensitive method which not only complements other typing schemes but also may be a substitute and prove to be especially suited for immediate epidemiological tracking of nosocomial infections due to C. difficile.

Identification of outbreak-associated and other strains of Clostridium difficile by numerical analysis of SDS-PAGE protein patterns

Seventy-three cultures of Clostridium difficile isolated both during, and in the period immediately following, an outbreak of infection in a group of three hospitals, were characterized by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of whole-cell proteins. Each protein pattern was characterized by the presence of one or two dense bands which were highly reproducible. The protein patterns were used as the basis for a numerical analysis which divided the strains into five phenons (electrophoretic or EP types). The majority, 60 of the 73 cultures, belonged to a single phenon which included strains from both patients and the environment. We conclude that high-resolution SDS-PAGE of proteins provides an effective method for typing C. difficile and therefore for tracing the possible spread of epidemic strains in hospitals and other institutions, thereby allowing a better understanding of the epidemiology of the organism.

Management and control of a large outbreak of diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile

In the six-month period 1 November 1991 to 1 May 1992 175 patients developed diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile in three hospitals in Manchester, UK. Most patients (90%) were over 60 years old and had been admitted to acute geriatric or medical wards with other illnesses. Infection is thought to have contributed to 17 deaths. Twenty-two patients relapsed clinically after antibiotic treatment. The outbreak began in one ward and affected 15 patients and two nurses. During the following months cases occurred on 34 wards. The pattern of spread suggested that a ward index case was followed by several secondary cases. Pyrolysis mass spectrometry showed that 79% of isolates of C. difficile belong to a single cluster and this putative outbreak strain also extensively colonizes the hospital environment. It was also responsible for a smaller outbreak in 1991 and many 'sporadic' cases in our hospitals before then. An outbreak control team was convened at an early stage and expert opinion co-opted. Infection control measures included: intensive education of staff; increased vigilance; strict enteric precautions; cohort nursing in a designated ward; rigorous cleaning procedures including emptying and 'deep' cleaning of wards where several cases had occurred; restriction of staff and patient movement; and restriction of antibiotic use. Subsequent to these measures there has been a substantial and sustained decrease in the number of new cases.

Investigation of an outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection in a general hospital by numerical analysis of protein patterns by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

One hundred forty-five cultures of Clostridium difficile, including strains from an apparent nosocomial outbreak of infection, were characterized by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of whole-cell proteins. Each protein pattern was characterized by the presence of one to three dense bands which were highly reproducible. The first 100 strains (in chronological order) were used as the basis for a numerical analysis which divided the strains into 17 phenons (EP types 1 to 17). The protein patterns of the remaining 45 strains were identified to type by comparing their individual patterns against a data base made up of the protein patterns of the first 100 strains. EP type 1 was the most common, with 70 of 139 (50%) patient isolates having this pattern type, and it accounted for 26 of 35 strains (74%) from patients in a medical teaching ward from which the outbreak was believed to have originated. This type was also found as a high proportion of isolations in a number of other medical and oncology wards, but the majority of these isolates occurred subsequent to the isolations on the initial outbreak ward. This technique can therefore provide a method for tracing the possible spread of epidemic strains in hospitals and other institutions and may contribute to a better understanding of the epidemiology of C. difficile.

Clostridium difficile: clinical disease and diagnosis

Clostridium difficile is an opportunistic pathogen that causes a spectrum of disease ranging from antibiotic-associated diarrhea to pseudomembranous colitis. Although the disease was first described in 1893, the etiologic agent was not isolated and identified until 1978. Since clinical and pathological features of C. difficile-associated disease are not easily distinguished from those of other gastrointestinal diseases, including ulcerative colitis, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, and Crohn's disease, diagnostic methods have relied on either isolation and identification of the microorganism or direct detection of bacterial antigens or toxins in stool specimens. The current review focuses on the sensitivity, specificity, and practical use of several diagnostic tests, including methods for culture of the etiologic agent, cellular cytotoxicity assays, latex agglutination tests, enzyme immunoassay systems, counterimmunoelectrophoresis, fluorescent-antibody assays, and polymerase chain reactions.

Development of a rapid and efficient restriction endonuclease analysis typing system for Clostridium difficile and correlation with other typing systems

A HindIII restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing system for total genomic Clostridium difficile DNA including a rapid and efficient method of DNA extraction and a scheme for organizing unique electrophoretic DNA band patterns was developed. REA typing was performed by two extraction methods for 1,965 C. difficile isolates obtained from patients with symptomatic C. difficile disease, asymptomatic patients who were C. difficile culture positive, and environmental surfaces. This isolate collection yielded 206 unique REA types, which were organized into 75 groups. A reference strain representing each unique REA type was chosen for DNA band pattern comparisons, cytotoxin testing, and plasmid analysis. The DNA band patterns utilizing a guanidine thiocyanate-EDTA-Sarkosyl DNA extraction method were 94% reproducible, while the original and sporadically problematic diethyl pyrocarbonate-sodium dodecyl sulfate DNA extraction method was 98% reproducible when readable patterns were obtained. Reference strains from 43 of the 75 groups were cytotoxin positive, 28 groups were cytotoxin negative, and 4 groups included both toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains. Cytotoxicity of isolates with a particular REA type was always consistent with the toxicity of the reference strain for that type. REA typing was able to discriminate strain differences within types identified by the immunoblot (89 isolates), bacteriophage-bacteriocin (44 isolates), and ribotyping (23 isolates) methods. REA typing is a sensitive, discriminating, reproducible, and rapid method for differentiating C. difficile strains and is suitable for large-scale epidemiologic studies.

Effects of Clostridium difficile toxin B on human monocytes and macrophages: possible relationship with cytoskeletal rearrangement

Toxin B from Clostridium difficile is cytopathic in vitro for various types of cells, including polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes, and monocytes. Since intestine lamina propria is rich in macrophages, we studied the effect of toxin B on human monocytes and on human macrophages generated in vitro by long-term culture of purified circulating blood monocytes. Upon addition of toxin B, human monocytes exhibited few modifications whereas macrophages adopted a stellate morphology, with rounding up of the perikaryon. Toxin B made microfilaments of actin disappear and induced an important reorganization of vimentin and a redistribution of tubulin. Membrane area increased by approximately 16%. Toxin B did not affect the viability of human mononuclear phagocytes and did not exert any significant lytic effect. It profoundly altered the phagocytic function of macrophages. When activated by gamma interferon in the presence of toxin B, monocytes were more cytotoxic for U-937 target cells than control monocytes activated in absence of toxin. Finally, the combined treatment of monocytes with gamma interferon and toxin B increased significantly the secretion of tumor necrosis factor alpha, whereas toxin B alone was unable to induce tumor necrosis factor production. These results suggest that morphological and functional alterations induced in human mononuclear phagocytes by toxin B from C. difficile are due to the disorganization of the cytoskeleton and the resulting impairment of the membrane traffic equilibrium.

Epidemiological aspects of infections caused by Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium difficile

Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium difficile are two of the most common anaerobes associated with human disease. Studies on the epidemiology of Bacteroides fragilis are limited and are based predominantly on serogrouping, which suggests intraspecies differences. Further studies using newer techniques for typing are required to elucidate the epidemiological characteristics of this important pathogen. By contrast, numerous phenotypic, immunological and molecular methods have been developed for typing and fingerprinting of Clostridium difficile and applied in epidemiological studies to show conclusively that Clostridium difficile is nosocomially acquired and that there is transmission and cross-infection between hospital patients.

Purification and characterization of an immunodominant 36 kDa antigen present on the cell surface of Clostridium difficile

The 36 kDa antigen represents the major EDTA-extracted protein of Clostridium difficile strains belonging to electrophoretic group 2. Antibodies to this antigen are found in sera of patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhoea. The 36 kDa antigen was extracted from C. difficile C253 by EDTA and purified by gel filtration (Sephacryl S300) and ion exchange chromatography (DEAE-Trisacryl M). The molecular weight of the purified protein was 36 kDa as determined by SDS-PAGE, also in non-reducing conditions. By gel filtration, the molecular size appeared to be 72 kDa and was not modified by the presence of EDTA or SDS in the column buffer. Since IEF showed a single isoelectric form of pI 4.6, the protein could be a homodimeric molecule. Immunofluorescence demonstrated that the 36 kDa antigen was located on the surface of the C. difficile cell. Monospecific antiserum raised in rabbits reacted positively with the 36 kDa protein of most group 2 C. difficile strains isolated from antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD) outbreaks in Italy and other European countries.

Presence of Clostridium difficile and antibiotic and beta-lactamase activities in feces of volunteers treated with oral cefixime, oral cefpodoxime proxetil, or placebo

Three groups of six healthy adult volunteers were randomly assigned to a treatment with 400 mg of oral cefpodoxime proxetil, oral cefixime, or placebo per day for 10 days. Informed consent was obtained from all volunteers. Clostridium difficile was not detected in the feces of any subject before treatment or at any time in the subjects in the placebo group. C. difficile was, however, detected in all subjects treated with cefpodoxime proxetil and in five of six treated with cefixime. Genomic DNA restriction patterns showed that the strains of C. difficile differed from one volunteer to another. Two subjects both shed different strains at different times during the 25-day surveillance period. All isolates were resistant to cefixime and cefpodoxime (MIC for 90% of strains, 256 and 512 mg/liter, respectively). Antibiotic activity was found in the feces of one volunteer treated with cefpodoxime proxetil and of four volunteers treated with cefixime. It was inversely correlated with the presence of fecal beta-lactamase activity. Intestinal side effects were limited to modifications of stool consistency, which occurred in only 3 of the 12 treated volunteers and did not lead to cessation of treatment. These modifications were significantly associated with the presence of fecal antibiotic activity (P less than 0.05) but not with the shedding of toxigenic or nontoxigenic strains of C. difficile or with the presence of toxin A in feces, which was detected only in one perfectly healthy treated volunteer.

Evaluation of a new commercial Clostridium difficile toxin A enzyme immunoassay using diarrhoeal stools

A new, commercially available enzyme immunoassay for the detection of toxin A in stool specimens, the Premier Clostridium difficile Toxin A test (Meridian Diagnostics), was evaluated using 228 diarrhoeal stool specimens. Using a cytotoxin assay on HeLa cells as the reference method, this new test resulted in a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 95%. Using the presence or absence of a toxigenic strain in the stools as the reference method, the sensitivity was similar to that of the cytotoxin assay (71.7+ versus 70.5%) and the overall correlation was even better (89.4% versus 82%). The Premier Clostridium difficile Toxin A assay is rapid and easy to perform and is an excellent alternative to the usual toxin B assay.