Limited Variation in BK Virus T-Cell Epitopes Revealed by Next-Generation Sequencing

The value and complexity of studying cellular immunity against BK Polyomavirus in kidney transplant recipients

BK Polyomavirus is of particular concern for kidney transplant recipients, due to their immunosuppression. This problem is exacerbated by the high effectiveness of antirejection therapies, which also compromise the organism's ability to fight viral infections. The long-term risk is loss of graft function through BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). The assessment of host immunity and its link to the control of viral infections is a major challenge. In terms of humoral immunity, researchers have highlighted the prognostic value of the pre-transplantation anti-BKPyV immunoglobulin G titer. However, humoral immunity alone does not guarantee viral clearance, and the correlation between the humoral response and the time course of the infection remains weak. In contrast, cellular immunity variables appear to be more closely associated with viral clearance, given that the cellular immune response to the kidney transplant is the main target of immunosuppressive treatments in recipients. However, the assessment of the cellular immune response to BK Polyomavirus is complex, and many details still need to be characterized. Here, we review the current state of knowledge about BKPyV cellular immunity, as well as the difficulties that may be encountered in studying it in kidney transplant recipient. This is an essential area of research for optimizing the management of transplant recipients and minimizing the risks associated with insidious BKPyV disease.

BK Polyomavirus Diversity After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection is common after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is associated with the development of hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). The role that BKPyV plays in the pathogenesis of HC is not well characterized. We investigated the impact of BKPyV diversity on the development of HC using a previously established cohort of pediatric HSCT patients. There were 147 urine samples with quantifiable BKPyV at month 1 after HSCT; 137 (93.2%) were amplified using our in-house polymerase chain reaction approach and sent for next-generation sequencing. Subtype Ia was most frequent (61.3%), followed by subtype Ib1 (31.4%). The median viral load of subtype Ia samples was higher than for subtype Ib1 at month 1. Across the protein coding regions, APOBEC-induced mutations and signature patterns associated with HC were identified. This is the largest sequencing study of a single cohort of HSCT patients, providing a vast resource of sequence data for future analyses.

Phylogenetic analysis of BKV genetic variations, based on the whole sequence of the genome and different genomic sections

OBJECTIVE(S)

BK polyomavirus virus primarily infects humans in their early life stages, and in later life stages, immunosuppressed patients may develop asymptomatic infections. The nucleotides 1744-1812 in the VP1 gene are traditionally used to determine this virus's genotype.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The complete genome of the BKV samples from patients referred to Masih Daneshvari Hospital's virology research center was amplified by previously known primer sets. The phylogenetic diversity of the whole genome, different genomic sections, and the non-coding control region of BK virus samples were investigated. Using software Mega X and references, the samples' genotype was determined in separate genomic fragments and the whole genome.

RESULTS

The samples were classified into two genotypes (I and IV) and five subtypes (Ia, Ib-2, IVc-1, and IVc-2), but none of the isolates belonged to genotype II, III, V, or VI. The Large T antigen-based phylogenetic tree provided 100% bootstrap values for these divisions, which were superior to those (96-100%) used in the VP1 sequence. Among the genomic segments, LTag and VP1 had the most mutations. The non-coding control area contained mutations at the O41 position in the granulocyte/macrophage stimulus gene and the P31 position in the NF-1 gene.

CONCLUSION

The validity of the phylogenetic analysis was supported by sequence analysis, which found SNPs that could be useful for sub-classifying isolates. More research with a large number of samples and in the wider geographical areas is needed to understand the genetic diversity of the BKV in Iran and also to determine these SNPs' clinical significance in terms of patient outcome and viral load dynamics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Beyond antivirals: virus-specific T-cell immunotherapy for BK virus haemorrhagic cystitis and JC virus progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The clinical manifestations of the polyomaviruses BK and JC in immunocompromised patients include BK virus (BKV) induced haemorrhagic cystitis and nephropathy, and JC virus (JCV) associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and are typically a consequence of impaired adaptive immunity in the host. To date, little clinical success has been achieved with antiviral agents or other drug therapies to treat these conditions. Here we review the methods and outcomes of the most recent clinical studies utilising adoptive immunotherapy with BK and/or JC virus-specific T-cells (VST) as either prophylaxis or treatment alternatives.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last 12-18 months, several clinical trials have been published in the post-haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) setting showing good clinical success with the use of VST for treatment of BK viremia ± haemorrhagic cystitis. Between 82 and 100% clinical response has been observed in haemorrhagic cystitis using either third-party or donor-derived VST. The therapy was well tolerated with few cases of graft versus host disease in HSCT recipients, but immune mediated renal allograft loss was observed in one renal transplant recipient. Studies using BKV/JCV VST to treat PML are hindered by few patients who are sufficiently stable to receive VST. In a condition that otherwise carries such poor prognosis, VST were associated with clearance of JC virus, clinical and radiological improvement in some patients. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome was a noted adverse event.

SUMMARY

Restoration of BK and JC virus immunity using VST immunotherapy has shown good clinical outcomes in BKV associated infections. Further evaluation with the administration of VST earlier in the course of disease is warranted for the treatment of BKV associated nephropathy in renal allograft and in JCV PML. In both indications, larger cohorts and standardisation of dosing and outcome measures would be of benefit.

Optimized amplification of BK polyomavirus in urine

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that typically results in asymptomatic infection. However, in immunocompromised individuals, BKPyV viral shedding in the urine can reach 10⁹ copies per mL. These high viral levels within urine provide ideal samples for next-generation sequencing to accurately determine BKPyV genotype and identify mutations associated with pathogenesis. Sequencing data obtained can be further analyzed to better understand and characterize the genetic diversity present in BKPyV. Here, methods are described for the successful extraction of viral DNA from urine and the subsequent amplification methods to prepare a sample for next-generation sequencing.

Third-Party BK Virus-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Therapy for Hemorrhagic Cystitis Following Allotransplantation

PURPOSE

BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis (BKV-HC) is a common complication of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), particularly in recipients of alternative donor transplants, which are being performed in increasing numbers. BKV-HC typically results in painful hematuria, urinary obstruction, and renal dysfunction, without a definitive therapeutic option.

METHODS

We performed a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02479698) to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of administering most closely HLA-matched third-party BKV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), generated from 26 healthy donors and banked for off-the-shelf use. The cells were infused into 59 patients who developed BKV-HC following AHSCT. Comprehensive clinical assessments and correlative studies were performed.

RESULTS

Response to BKV-CTL infusion was rapid; the day 14 overall response rate was 67.7% (40 of 59 evaluable patients), which increased to 81.6% among evaluable patients at day 45 (40 of 49 evaluable patients). No patient lost a previously achieved response. There were no cases of de novo grade 3 or 4 graft-versus-host disease, graft failure, or infusion-related toxicities. BKV-CTLs were identified in patient blood samples up to 3 months postinfusion and their in vivo expansion predicted for clinical response. A matched-pair analysis revealed that, compared with standard of care, after accounting for prognostic covariate effects, treatment with BKV-CTLs resulted in higher probabilities of response at all follow-up timepoints as well as significantly lower transfusion requirement.

CONCLUSION

Off-the-shelf BKV-CTLs are a safe and effective therapy for the management of patients with BKV-HC after AHSCT.

Virus-specific T-cell therapy to treat BK polyomavirus infection in bone marrow and solid organ transplant recipients

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection is a major complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT). Treatment options are limited, poorly effective, and have significant toxicities. Cellular therapy using T cells directed against BKPyV is an emerging therapy, and we report efficacy in controlling BKPyV-associated disease in highly immunocompromised patients. Virus-specific T cells (VSTs) against BKPyV were manufactured using either blood from the patient's stem cell donor (donor-derived VSTs) or from unrelated donors (third-party VSTs). VSTs were used to treat BKPyV in 38 HSCT recipients and 3 SOT recipients between June 2017 and December 2019. Overall response rate was 86% in patients treated for BK viremia, 100% in patients treated for hemorrhagic cystitis, and 87% in patients treated for both BK viremia and hemorrhagic cystitis. No infusional toxicity, de novo graft-versus-host disease, or rejection of the organ occurred attributable to the VST infusion. BKPyV-specific immune responses were demonstrated by interferon-γ production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells postinfusion in response to BKPyV antigens. VSTs are a safe and potentially effective strategy to treat BKPyV and associated symptoms in recipients of HSCT and SOT. Cellular therapy should be considered for all patients with BKPyV and underlying immune suppression at risk of complications. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02532452.

BK Polyomavirus Genotypes in Two Patients after Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection can lead to nephropathy and hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). We evaluated BKPyV genotypes in two individuals after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). The first case developed HC and was infected with genotype Ib-2, while the second did not develop HC and was infected with genotype Ia.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection can lead to nephropathy and hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). We evaluated BKPyV genotypes in two individuals after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). The first case developed HC and was infected with genotype Ib-2, while the second did not develop HC and was infected with genotype Ia.

BK polyomavirus-specific antibody and T-cell responses in kidney transplantation: update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) has emerged as a significant cause of premature graft failure after kidney transplantation. Without effective antiviral drugs, treatment is based on reducing immunosuppression to regain immune control over BKPyV replication. The paradigm of high-level viruria/decoy cells, BKPyV-DNAemia, and proven nephropathy permits early interventions. Here, we review recent findings about BKPyV-specific antibody and T-cell responses and their potential role in risk stratification, immune monitoring, and therapy.

RECENT FINDING

Kidney transplant recipients having low or undetectable BKPyV-specific IgG immunoglobulin G (IgG) are higher risk for developing BKPyV-DNAemia if the donor has high BKPyV-specific IgG. This observation has been extended to neutralizing antibodies. Immunosuppression, impaired activation, proliferation, and exhaustion of BKPyV-specific T cells may increase the risk of developing BKPyV-DNAemia and nephropathy. Clearance of BKPyV-DNAemia was correlated with high CD8 T cell responses to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-types presenting BKPyV-encoded immunodominant 9mers. For clinical translation, these data need to be assessed in appropriately designed clinical studies, as outlined in recent guidelines on BKPyV in kidney transplantation.

SUMMARY

Evaluation of BKPyV-specific immune responses in recipient and donor may help to stratify the risk of BKPyV-DNAemia, nephropathy, and graft loss. Future efforts need to evaluate clinical translation, vaccines, and immunotherapy to control BKPyV replication.

BK polyomavirus diversity-Why viral variation matters

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV or BKV) is a non-enveloped, circular double-stranded DNA virus that may exceed 80% seroprevalence in adults. BKV infection typically occurs during childhood, and the majority of adults are latently infected. While BKV infection is rarely associated with clinical disease in most individuals, in immunosuppressed individuals, reactivation may cause kidney (BK-associated nephropathy) or bladder (hemorrhagic cystitis and ureteral stenosis) injury. No antiviral therapies have been approved for the treatment of BKV infection. Reducing immunosuppression is the most effective therapy, although this is not feasible in many patients. Thus, a robust understanding of viral pathogenesis and viral diversity remains important for the development of future therapeutic strategies. Studies of BKV diversity are quite sparse compared to other common viral infections; thus, much of our understanding of BVK variability and evolution relies heavily analogous studies of other viruses such as HIV or viral hepatitis. We provide a comprehensive review of BKV diversity at the population and individual level with careful consideration of how viral variability may impact viral replication, pathogenesis, tropism, and protein function. We also discuss a number of outstanding questions related to BK virus diversity that should be explored rigorously in future studies.

BK polyomavirus genotypes in renal transplant recipients in the United States: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the United States, increasing ethnic diversity has been apparent. However, the epidemiology and trends of BKV genotypes remain unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to assess the prevalence of BKV genotypes among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients in the United States.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted through October 2018 utilizing MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database to identify studies that reported the prevalence of BKV subtypes and/or subgroups in KTx recipients in the United States. Pooled prevalence rates were combined using random effects, generic inverse variance method. The protocol for this study is registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42019134582).

RESULTS

A total of eight observational studies with a total of 193 samples (urine, blood, and kidney tissues) from 188 BKV-infected KTX recipients were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated prevalence rates of BKV subtypes were 72.2% (95% confidence of interval [CI]: 62.7-80.0%) for subtype I, 6.8% (95% CI: 2.5-16.9%) for subtype II, 8.3% (95% CI: 4.4-15.1%) for subtype III, and 16.1% (95% CI: 10.4-24.2%) for subtype IV, respectively. While metaregression analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between year of study and the prevalence of BKV subtype I (slopes = +0.1023, P = .01), there were no significant correlations between year of study and percentages of BKV subtype II-IV (P > .05). Among KTx recipients with BKV subtype I, the pooled estimated percentages of BKV subgroups were 22.4% (95% CI: 13.7-34.5%) for subgroup Ia, 30.6% (95% CI: 17.7-47.5%) for subgroup Ib1, 47.7% (95% CI: 35.8-59.9%) for subgroup Ib2, and 4.1% (95% CI:1.2-13.3%) for subgroup Ic, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BKV subtype I is the most prevalent subtype among KTx recipients in the United States and its prevalence seems to increasing overtime. Subgroup Ib2 is the most common subgroup among BKV subtype I.

BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Aspects, Immune Regulation, and Emerging Therapies

BK polyomavirus (BKV) causes frequent infections during childhood and establishes persistent infections within renal tubular cells and the uroepithelium, with minimal clinical implications. However, reactivation of BKV in immunocompromised individuals following renal or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may cause serious complications, including BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), ureteric stenosis, or hemorrhagic cystitis. Implementation of more potent immunosuppression and increased posttransplant surveillance has resulted in a higher incidence of BKVAN. Antiviral immunity plays a crucial role in controlling BKV replication, and our increasing knowledge about host-virus interactions has led to the development of improved diagnostic tools and clinical management strategies. Currently, there are no effective antiviral agents for BKV infection, and the mainstay of managing reactivation is reduction of immunosuppression. Development of immune-based therapies to combat BKV may provide new and exciting opportunities for the successful treatment of BKV-associated complications.

BK polyomavirus genotypes Ia and Ib1 exhibit different biological properties in renal transplant recipients

BK polyomavirus (BKV) is an opportunist agent associated with nephropathy (BKVAN) in 1-10% of kidney transplant recipients. BKV is classified into genotypes or subgroups according to minor nucleotidic variations with unknown biological implications. Studies assessing the possible association between genotypes and the risk of BKVAN in kidney transplant patients have presented conflicting results. In these studies, genotype Ia, which is highly prevalent in Brazil, was less frequently found and, thus, comparative data on the biological properties of this genotype are lacking. In this study, BKV Ia and Ib1 genotypes were compared according to their viral load, genetic evolution (VP1 and NCCR) - in a cohort of renal transplant recipients. The patients infected with Ia (13/23; 56.5%) genotype exhibited higher viral loads in urine [>1.4 log over Ib1 (10/23; 43.5%); p=0.025]. In addition, genotype Ia was associated with diverse mutations at VP1 loops and sites under positive selection outside loops, which were totally absent in Ib1. Although the number of viremic patients was similar, the three patients who had BK nephropathy (BKVAN) were infected with Ia genotype. NCCR architecture (ww or rr) were not distinctive between Ia and Ib1 genotypes. Ia genotype, which is rare in other published BKV cohorts, presented some diverse biological properties in transplanted recipients in comparison to Ib1.

T cell therapies for human polyomavirus diseases

Rapid restoration of virus-specific T immunity via adoptive transfer of ex vivo generated T cells has been proven as a powerful therapy for patients with advanced cancers and refractory viral infections such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). BK virus (BKV), John Cunningham virus (JCV), and Merkel cell carcinoma virus (MCV) are the members of the rapidly growing human polyomavirus (hPyV) family that commonly infects most healthy humans. These viruses have a clearly established potential for causing severe end-organ damage or malignant transformation, especially in individuals with weakened immunity who are unable to mount or regain endogenous T-cell responses as a result of underlying leukemia or iatrogenic immunosuppression in autoimmunity, bone marrow and solid organ transplant settings. Here we will discuss recent advances in using T-cell-based immunotherapies to save patients suffering from PyV-associated diseases including hemorrhagic cystitis, BKV virus-associated nephropathy, and JC-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). We will also review progress in the understanding of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) as a virally driven tumor that is amenable to immune intervention and can be targeted with adoptively transferred T cells specific for viral oncoproteins.

BK polyomavirus: a review of the virology, pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, and treatment

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a non-enveloped, circular dsDNA virus with a genome of approximately 5100 base pairs. It can be divided into four major genotypes, but the effects of different genotypes on clinical disease are uncertain. Primary BKPyV infection is generally acquired asymptomatically in childhood. It establishes low-level persistence in many tissues, particularly the genitourinary tract. Reactivation can lead to severe disease including BKPyV-associated nephropathy confirmed by renal biopsy, hemorrhagic cystitis and meningoencephalitis. Nucleic acid amplification testing of blood and urine is the main diagnostic and prognostic test for BKPyV infection. The treatment of BKPyV infection has concentrated on reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. Recent studies suggest that antiviral drugs have demonstrated only modest benefit, but adoptive T-cell therapies offer potential advances.

BK nephropathy in the native kidneys of patients with organ transplants: Clinical spectrum of BK infection

Nephropathy secondary to BK virus, a member of the Papoviridae family of viruses, has been recognized for some time as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. In recent times, BK nephropathy (BKN) of the native kidneys has being increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic kidney disease in patients with solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplants and in patients with other clinical entities associated with immunosuppression. In such patients renal dysfunction is often attributed to other factors including nephrotoxicity of medications used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organs. Renal biopsy is required for the diagnosis of BKN. Quantitation of the BK viral load in blood and urine are surrogate diagnostic methods. The treatment of BKN is based on reduction of the immunosuppressive medications. Several compounds have shown antiviral activity, but have not consistently shown to have beneficial effects in BKN. In addition to BKN, BK viral infection can cause severe urinary bladder cystitis, ureteritis and urinary tract obstruction as well as manifestations in other organ systems including the central nervous system, the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal system and the hematopoietic system. BK viral infection has also been implicated in tumorigenesis. The spectrum of clinical manifestations from BK infection and infection from other members of the Papoviridae family is widening. Prevention and treatment of BK infection and infections from other Papovaviruses are subjects of intense research.