Multicenter Comparison Study of both Analytical and Clinical Performance across Four Roche Hepatitis C Virus RNA Assays Utilizing Different Platforms

Real-world performance of the NeuMoDx™ HCV Quant Test for quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA

Quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA in serum or plasma samples is an essential parameter in HCV diagnostics. Here, the NeuMoDx™Molecular System (Qiagen) was tested for the most common HCV genotypes and compared to the cobas c6800 system (Roche). HCV-RNA from 131 plasma/serum samples from chronically infected patients was determined in parallel on the NeuMoDx and c6800 systems. Linearity was analysed using the four most common HCV genotypes (1-4) in our cohort. The coefficient of variation (CV) within (intra-assay) and between (inter-assay) runs was calculated based on HCV-RNA concentration. Quantitative HCV-RNA results were highly correlated on both test systems (R2 = 0.7947; y = 0.94 x + 0.37). On average, the NeuMoDx and c6800 HCV RNA levels showed a mean difference of only 0.05 log10 IU/mL but with a broad distribution (±1.2 2 x SD). The NeuMoDx demonstrated very good linearity across all HCV genotypes tested at concentrations between 1.7 and 6.2 log10 IU/mL (R2 range: 0.9257-0.9991) with the highest mean coefficient of determination for genotype 1 (R2 = 0.9909). The mean intra- and inter-assay CV for both serum and plasma samples was <5 %. The NeuMoDx HCV-RNA Assay demonstrates high subtype-independent comparability, linearity, and reproducibility for the quantification of HCV-RNA in serum and plasma samples from chronically infected patients.

Evaluation of a quantitative RT-PCR assay for the detection of the emerging coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 using a high throughput system

Facing the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), high-volume respiratory testing is demanded in laboratories worldwide. We evaluated the performance of a molecular assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 on a high-throughput platform, the cobas 6800, using the 'open channel' for integration of a laboratory-developed assay. We observed good analytical performance in clinical specimens. The fully automated workflow enables high-throughput testing with minimal hands-on time, while offering fast and reliable results.

Generating timely molecular diagnostic test results: workflow comparison of the cobas® 6800/8800 to Panther

Background: Molecular diagnostic tests for HBV, HCV and HIV-1 and other pathogens are widely used for clinical management. Practical issues related to workflow and labor requirements need to be characterized to inform selection of the most appropriate system. Research design and methods: We compared the workflow of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 (Roche) and Panther (Hologic), using average mid-size laboratory test volumes for five different assays (HIV-1, HBV, HCV, HPV or TV, and CT/NG). Results: Set-up time, time to first results, time to last results, and total hands-on time for cobas 6800 was 0.40, 2.47, 7.12, and 0.98 hours, respectively; on the Panther system, these times were 0.75, 2.7, 9.1, and 1.48 hours. Fifty-seven samples had results available at the first time point on cobas 6800 compared to 5 samples on the Panther system. The Panther system required more manual steps including several with potential risks of contamination or error. The number of reagents items required was 5 for cobas 6800 and 40 for the Panther system. Conclusions: Both systems provided a high level of automation. The cobas 6800 platform had shorter start up, time to first result, time to last result and hands-on times than the Panther system.

Analytical performance of four molecular platforms used for HIV-1, HBV and HCV viral load determinations

Background: Viral load (VL) quantification is important for the management of HBV, HCV, and HIV-1-infected patients. Several semi- or fully automated systems and assays are available that can be used to measure VL for these and other targets. Research design and methods: We assessed the accuracy, genotype/subtype inclusivity, and precision of four VL assays for three viral targets: cobas 4800 (Roche), cobas 6800 (Roche), Aptima (Hologic) and VERIS (Beckman), using WHO standards, cell culture supernatants and clinical samples. Results: Most results were close to expected values, except for significant under-quantification of HIV-1 group O, HBV genotype C, and D at high VL, and HCV genotype 3 by Aptima, and of HIV-1 CRF01_AE and group N and HCV genotype 3 by VERIS. Precision was comparable between tests except for VERIS HCV, which showed more variability. Aptima and cobas 6800 results agreed well with each other except HBV VL at lower VL (<10,000 IU/mL) where Aptima results tended to be higher. Conclusions: Results from different VL assays may not always agree in certain subsets of patients. Clinicians should we aware of these findings when making treatment decisions.

Clinical evaluation of multiplex RT-PCR assays for the detection of influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus using a high throughput system

BACKGROUND

Lower respiratory tract infections are a major threat to public health systems worldwide, with RSV and influenza being the main agents causing hospitalization. In outbreak situations, high-volume respiratory testing is needed. In this study, we evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of a pre-designed primer/probe set for the simultaneous multiplex detection of both viruses on a high-throughput platform, the cobas^® 6800, using the "open channel" of the system for integration of lab-developed assays for the detection of influenza and RSV.

RESULTS

Using the influenza/RSV qPCR Assay with swabs, LoD (95%) in TCID50/mL for influenza-A was 0.009, influenza-B 0.003, RSV-A 0.202, and RSV-B 0.009. Inter-run variability (3xLoD) was low (<1 Ct for all targets). Of 371 clinical respiratory specimens analyzed, results were concordant for 358 samples. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of the assay were 98.3% and 98.4% for Flu-A, 100% and 98.5% for Flu-B, and 98.6% and 99.7% for RSV. All quality assessment panel specimens (N = 63, including avian influenza strains) were correctly identified. None of the tested microorganisms showed cross-reactivity.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CE-IVD assays, the assay evaluated here showed good analytical and clinical sensitivity and specificity with broad coverage of different virus strains. It offers high-throughput capacity with low hands-on time, facilitating the laboratory management of large respiratory outbreaks.

HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: technical improvement of laboratory logistics and good clinical performance of the cobas 6800 in comparison to the 4800 system

BACKGROUND

European guidelines for cervical cancer screening now recommend the use of clinically validated assays for high-risk HPV-DNA sequences as primary test in women older than 30 years, performed in centralized laboratories, and run on systems providing automated solutions for all steps.

METHODS

We conducted a comparison study, according to the international guidelines, nested within the organized population-based cervical screening program, between the cobas 4800 and 6800 systems (Roche Diagnostics), to evaluate accuracy and reproducibility of HPV test results and laboratory workflow. In Italy implementation of HPV cervical screening is under way on a regional basis; in Veneto it started in June 2015, following a piloting phase; the assay in use in the three centralized laboratories is the cobas 4800 HPV test, run on the cobas 4800 system. Comparison of HPV results with a new version of the assay (cobas 6800/8800 HPV) run on the cobas 6800 system, and intra- and inter-reproducibility analyses have been conducted in samples collected in PreservCyt medium (Hologic) from women without and with a subsequent diagnosis of high-grade lesion.

RESULTS

Samples from women older than 30 years attending organized cervical cancer screening were used. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated on 60 cases and 925 controls, respectively; intra-laboratory reproducibility and inter-laboratory agreement by the 6800 system were evaluated on 593 and 460 specimens, respectively. Our results showed a very high agreement (> 98%) for overall qualitative results between the two systems; clinical sensitivity and specificity of the HPV assay run on 6800 were non-inferior to those of the HPV assay run on 4800 (p = 0,0157 and p = 0,0056, respectively, at the recommended thresholds of 90 and 98%); kappa values of 0.967 and 0.969 were obtained for intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility analyses in the 6800 system. The 6800 platform displayed several technological improvements over the 4800 system, with higher throughput and laboratory productivity, and lower operator's hands-on time.

CONCLUSIONS

The new cobas 6800/8800 HPV assay run on the 6800 instrument is suitable for use in large centralized laboratories included within population-based cervical cancer screening programs.

Multicenter Evaluation of Two Next-Generation HIV-1 Quantitation Assays, Aptima Quant Dx and Cobas 6800, in Comparison to the RealTime HIV-1 Reference Assay

High accuracy and precision at the lower end of quantification are crucial requirements of a modern HIV viral load (VL) assay, since some clinically relevant thresholds are located at 50 and 200 copies/ml. In this study, we compared the performance of two new fully automated HIV-1 VL assays, Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx and Cobas HIV-1 (Cobas 6800), with the established RealTime m2000 assay. Assay precision and accuracy were evaluated in a retrospective evaluation out of excess plasma material from four HIV-1+ individuals (subtypes B, C, CRF01_AE, and CRF02_AG). Native plasma samples were diluted to nominal concentrations at 50 and 200 copies/ml (according to the RealTime m2000 assay). All dilutions were tested in triplicate in five independent runs over 5 days and in three labs per system. Assay concordance was determined using 1,011 surplus clinical routine samples, as well as selected retrospective longitudinal samples from 7 patients on treatment. The three assays yielded highly concordant results for individual clinical samples (R2 > 0.98; average difference, ≤0.2 log copies/ml) and retrospective longitudinal samples from patients on treatment. The Aptima and RealTime assays showed similar high precision, meeting the 5σ criterion for the majority of samples across all labs and subtypes. The Cobas assay was less precise, missing the 5σ criterion for the majority of samples at low concentrations. In this analysis, results from the Cobas assay appeared less reliable near the clinically relevant cutoff and should be interpreted with more caution in this context. Due to high precision, full automation, and high concordance with the RealTime assay, the Aptima assay represents a good alternative in routine VL monitoring.

Evaluation of the cobas® GT hepatitis C virus genotyping assay in G1-6 viruses including low viral loads and LiPA failures

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drug performances depend on the viral genotype. So international recommendations give typing of the virus a prerequisite for treatment choice and patient management. Commercially available HCV genotyping kits are scarce and this analysis is often in-house using tedious PCRs and Sanger sequencing, leading to a lack of standardization. A newly commercialized HCV genotyping assay based on real-time PCR has been developed by Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany). We compared this new assay with our in-house PCRs -sequencing technique on 101 regular samples and 81 LiPA failures or low viral load samples. No genotype or 1a/1b subtype mismatch was observed. Two samples were misidentified at the subtype level without clinical impact. Three genotype 1b and two genotype 1a samples with low viral load could not be subtyped. Nevertheless, 13 (13%) samples from the regular panel and 35 (43%) from the more difficult-to-type panels failed to give results on first pass with the Roche kit. Failures were mostly associated with genotype 3 subtype a, with genotype 4 subtype non-a, or with viral loads <200 IU/mL (p = 0.0061). The workflow allowed a non-specialized technician to obtain results in less than 4 hours whereas 2 to 3 days and experienced staff were required with the in-house assay. In conclusion, the Roche cobas^® HCV GT kit is easy and rapid to use and provides reliable results. The high rate of uninterpretable results particularly for low viral load samples and less frequent genotypes, and the absence of subtyping for non-genotype 1 could require sending complex samples to a specialized laboratory.

Profile of Roche's cobas® HCV tests

INTRODUCTION

Molecular assays for detection and accurate quantitation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA have been important for identification and management of the hepatitis C. Furthermore, the HCV genotype should be assessed prior to treatment initiation. Recently, Roche developed the cobas® HCV tests for use on the cobas® 6800/8800 Systems and the cobas® 4800 System and the cobas® HCV genotyping (GT) test for use on the cobas® 4800 System. Areas covered: The analytic and clinical performance of the newly-developed tests is described according to the currently existing literature. Both tests for detection and quantitation of HCV RNA have been shown to be sensitive and linear, and correlate well with established Roche tests used in the routine diagnostic laboratory. The cobas® HCV GT test shows a good performance and is suitable for identification of HCV genotypes 1 to 6 and genotype 1 subtypes a and b in clinical specimens from individuals with chronic HCV infection. Expert commentary: The new tests are effective in screening for hepatitis C infection and in the management of patients with chronic HCV infection ensuring full HCV genotype coverage. They will replace the established Roche tests within the next few years.