Human papillomavirus DNA in urine samples compared with that in simultaneously collected urethra and cervix samples

Effect and rational application of topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Lesions in both the cervix and vagina require an efficacious non-invasive treatment therapy such as 5-Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy(5-ALA-PDT). In this study, we evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of 5-ALA PDT for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN & VAIN).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 patients diagnosed with CIN & VAIN and receiving 5-ALA PDT. All patients were first followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, then every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Out of 1051 patients referred for CIN (4.56%), 48 were diagnosed with CIN&VAIIN. The patients had statistically significant average vaginal and cervical lesion areas of 1.22 and 0.41 cm² respectively. 4 patients were lost during follow-up. The patients' complete remission (CR) rate was 88.64% (39/44) at 3-6 months after treatment, while the total HPV clearance rate was 46.34 and 60.98% at 3- and 12-months follow-up,respectively. HPV16/18 combined with other high-risk human papillomaviruses (hrHPV) (HPV16/18 and other hrHPV) infection exhibited a lower HPV clearance rate (P = 0.006). The treatment time in high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL) was higher than that of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LSIL). Notably, atypical vessels and endocervical canal lesions involvement significantly affected 5-ALA PDT. Moreover, 5 patients had residual lesions (11.36%) during follow-up, one patient presented recurrence (2.56%), while 4 had successful pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

5-ALA-PDT is a non-invasive, effective, and safe therapy for treating CIN & VAIN and can maintain the structural and functional integrity of target organs. However, its efficacy is relatively poor in patients with endocervical canal lesions involvement, atypical vessels, and HPV16/18 and other hrHPV infection.

HPV73 in cervical cancer and distribution of HPV73 variants in cervical dysplasia

HPV73 is classified as possibly oncogenic and is not recognized by most commercial primary HPV screening platforms. The aim was to determine the prevalence of HPV73 among invasive cervical cancers, formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples (N = 69), from southern Sweden during 2009 to 2010. Another aim was to determine proportions of HPV73 among Aptima HPV assay negative cervical cancers (N = 9, out of 206 cancers) and of high-grade cytological cervical diagnosis (N = 75, out of 5807 high grade lesions) in liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples collected between 2016 and 2019. We also investigated the distribution of HPV73 variants A1, A2 and B among HPV73-positive cases. HPV73 was detected by multiplex MGP-PCR and Luminex, and HPV73 variants were identified by sequencing PCR amplicons. HPV73 was detected in 2.9% (2/69, 95% CI: 0.18-9.9) of the FFPE cervical cancer series. Among the Aptima HPV-negative LBC samples, HPV73 was present in 55.5% (5/9) of the cancers and 29.3% (22/75) of the different grades of cervical diagnosis. The A1, A2 and B variants were present in 6.9% (2/29), 82.7% (24/29) and 10.3% (3/29) of the HPV73-positive women, respectively. Among the seven HPV73 cancer cases (two FFPE samples and five LBC samples), six A2 and one A1 isolate were detected. In summary, the A2 variant of HPV73 was most common in our region. In addition, the observed prevalence of HPV73 (2.9%) in cervical cancers and its relative high occurrence (55.5%) among Aptima HPV-negative cancers urge that detection of HPV73 should be included in future primary HPV screening programs.

Treatment of first-void urine with Aptima Transfer Solution increases detection of high-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA

Because of its non-invasive nature urine testing may enable increased screening for HPV in women who avoid cervical sampling. Comparisons have shown fewer HPV positives in urine. The objectives were to compare first-void urine (FVU) treated with proteinase K (PK) to untreated FVU and cervical samples collected from women attending a colposcopy clinic using an Aptima HPV mRNA assay, and comparing the HPV rates to cytology and pathology results. Female FVU (n = 433) was treated with Aptima Transfer Solution (ATS) containing PK within 24 h or after months of storage. Untreated female FVU samples were HPV-positive in 20.8-27.6% compared to 34.4-45.6% of ATS-treated FVU and 44.9-48.4% of PreservCyt samples. Good overall agreement for HR-HPV detection between ATS-FVU and PreservCyt was observed (81.1%; k 0.63). Validation of ATS treatment was performed on 356 male FVU, detecting 6.7% HPV positive compared to 3.4% of untreated samples (p = 0.059). Although HPV presence in ATS FVU and PreservCyt samples were similar, significantly more women with abnormal cervical cytology and histopathology were HPV-positive in cervical specimens than in ATS-treated FVU.

Comparison of human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in urine and cervical swab samples using the HPV GenoArray Diagnostic assay

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the leading cause of cervical cancer. Urine-based HPV testing offers a simple and non-invasive method because of its increasing acceptance. A total of 164 pairs of cervical swab and urine samples from Thai women who underwent cervical cancer screening were used for HPV testing with HPV GenoArray Diagnostic Kits. The overall concordance percentage for HPV detection in the cervical swab and urine samples was 65.2%. The HPV genotypes most commonly detected were HPV16 and HPV18. An analysis of the urine samples and a second analysis of the cervical swab samples showed that the differences in the overall HPV detection rate between women with normal and abnormal cytology were not significant (p > 0.05). Urine samples processed with the GenoArray assay is an alternative for women who decline to undergo Pap smear even though it is not ideal as the first-line screening option.

Comparison of urine samples and penile swabs for detection of human papillomavirus in HIV-negative Dutch men

OBJECTIVES

Penile swab sampling is the method of choice when testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) in men. Urine sampling is already used in routine sexually transmitted infections (STI) diagnostics and could provide a less invasive sampling method in men to detect HPV. Therefore we compared detection of HPV types in urine samples and penile swabs by the highly sensitive SPF10-LiPA25 system.

METHODS

First void urine and self-obtained penile swab samples were collected from 120 men, with a mean age of 29.4 years, visiting a STI clinic in South Limburg, the Netherlands. In total 111 of 120 men were included in the analysis. Broad-spectrum HPV DNA amplification and mucosal HPV genotyping were performed using the SPF10 DEIA-LiPA25 system (SPF10 HPV LiPA, V.1).

RESULTS

In total 75 (68%) men were positive for HPV in the combined analysis. Sixty-six (59%) paired samples were concordant in being positive or negative. In 39% of the men HPV DNA was detected only in the penile swab. In 2% of the men HPV DNA was detected only in the urine sample. Considering penile swabs as the gold standard, a sensitivity of 41% (95% CI 30% to 53%) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI 81% to 99%) was found. In 6 (5%) urines high risk types were repeatedly found that were not detected in the matching swab.

CONCLUSIONS

Urine samples are not comparable to penile swabs in the detection of HPV in men. However, the addition of urine samples to penile swabs could be of use in epidemiological or clearance studies.

Viral load and mRNA expression of HPV type 6 among cases with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine viral load of human papillomavirus type 6 (HPV6), physical state of HPV6-DNA, and transcription level of HPV6 E7-mRNA in laryngeal papilloma and in adjacent healthy mucosa.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

METHODS

A papilloma biopsy was collected from each of 25 adult patients with respiratory recurrent papillomatosis. From 14 of the 25 patients, we first collected a biopsy from healthy mucosa of the false vocal fold and another from the papilloma. Quantity of HPV6 and E7-mRNA was measured by polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

For the papilloma, the median load of HPV6 was 41 copies/cell, and the lowest amount was 5.4 copies/cell. Human papillomavirus type 6 was detected in 50% (7/14) of the healthy mucosa, with a median of 1.1 copies/cell, and the highest amount was 6.6 copies/cell. Overall, viral load was higher in papilloma than in healthy mucosa (P < 0.05). The average HPV6 E2/E7-DNA ratio was 1.3, indicating an episomal state. Human papillomavirus type 6-mRNA was detected in all HPV6-DNA-positive samples. The transcription median ratio of HPV6-mRNA/HPV6-DNA was 1.5 in papilloma and 3.8 in healthy mucosa.

CONCLUSION

The amount of HPV6-DNA was consistently higher in the papilloma than in healthy mucosa. The transcription level of HPV6 E7 mRNA was similar in the papilloma and in normal mucosa. We suggest that interfering with replication of HPV6 and suppression of HPV6 to fewer than five copies/cell may be curative.

Human papillomavirus prevalence in paired urine and cervical samples in women invited for cervical cancer screening

With the introduction of Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in young girls in 2007, it is important to monitor HPV infections and epidemiological changes in this target population. The present study has evaluated the detection of human papillomavirus DNA in paired cervical and urine samples to understand if HPV testing in urine could be used as non-invasive method to monitor HPV status in young women. The study enrolled 216 twenty five-year-old women, resident in Florence and invited for the first time to the cervical cancer Screening Program within a project evaluating the impact of HPV vaccination. HPV genotyping was performed on 216 paired urine and cervical samples. The overall concordance between cervix and urine samples, investigated by HPV genotyping (INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra), was: 85.6% (184/215), 84.6% (182/215), 80% (172/215) when the same HPV, at least the same HR HPV and all HR HPV, respectively, were detected. HPV type specific concordance in paired urine and cervical samples was observed in 85.8% (175/204) of women with normal cytology and in seven out of nine women with abnormal cytology. Urine seems to be a suitable and reliable biological material for HPV DNA detection as evidenced by the high concordance with HPV detected in cervical samples. These results suggest that urine could be a good noninvasive tool to monitor HPV infection in vaccinated women.

Accuracy of urinary human papillomavirus testing for presence of cervical HPV: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in urine in detecting cervical HPV in sexually active women.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of electronic databases from inception until December 2013, checks of reference lists, manual searches of recent issues of relevant journals, and contact with experts.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Test accuracy studies in sexually active women that compared detection of urine HPV DNA with detection of cervical HPV DNA.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data relating to patient characteristics, study context, risk of bias, and test accuracy. 2 × 2 tables were constructed and synthesised by bivariate mixed effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

16 articles reporting on 14 studies (1443 women) were eligible for meta-analysis. Most used commercial polymerase chain reaction methods on first void urine samples. Urine detection of any HPV had a pooled sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval 78% to 92%) and specificity of 94% (95% confidence interval 82% to 98%). Urine detection of high risk HPV had a pooled sensitivity of 77% (68% to 84%) and specificity of 88% (58% to 97%). Urine detection of HPV 16 and 18 had a pooled sensitivity of 73% (56% to 86%) and specificity of 98% (91% to 100%). Metaregression revealed an increase in sensitivity when urine samples were collected as first void compared with random or midstream (P=0.004).

LIMITATIONS

The major limitations of this review are the lack of a strictly uniform method for the detection of HPV in urine and the variation in accuracy between individual studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing urine for HPV seems to have good accuracy for the detection of cervical HPV, and testing first void urine samples is more accurate than random or midstream sampling. When cervical HPV detection is considered difficult in particular subgroups, urine testing should be regarded as an acceptable alternative.

Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among men in Europe: systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the commonest sexually transmitted infection worldwide and causes substantial morbidity in both sexes. Most European countries offer HPV vaccination for girls, but vaccine recommendations for boys are warranted.

AIMS

The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of genital HPV, identify parameters that affect the prevalence, and describe the type-specific prevalence among men in Europe.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature in PubMed and Embase.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Genital HPV prevalence and factors influencing prevalence in general and high-risk male populations in Europe.

RESULTS

We included 31 articles that gave the prevalence of genital HPV DNA among men in northern, southern and western Europe; no studies from eastern Europe were identified. The pooled HPV prevalence among 1,863 men representing the general population (nine studies) was 12.4%, with large heterogeneity between studies (I(2)  = 96.3%, P < 0.0001). The pooled HPV prevalence among 6,428 men in the high-risk population (22 studies) was 30.9%, also with substantial heterogeneity (I(2)  = 95.6%, P < 0.0001). In unadjusted meta-regression analysis, the HPV prevalence in the general population was significantly higher in studies published after 2000 (28.5%) than in earlier studies (8.8%) (P = 0.0179). In the meta-regression analysis adjusted by publication year, the heterogeneity in the two population groups could not be explained by geographical region, anatomical sampling site, or HPV detection method. HPV16 was the most prevalent high-risk type in both populations.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV prevalence differs in male general and high-risk populations, but HPV16 and HPV18 are among the most common HPV types detected in both groups. Our findings contribute knowledge that may be useful as a baseline measure before the introduction of HPV vaccination for boys in Europe, and add to understanding of the epidemiology of HPV infection in men.

Applicability of self-obtained urine and vaginal samples for HPV-16, -18, -31 and -45 cervical cancer screening in pregnancy: a pilot cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT: Aim: To conduct a pilot cross-sectional study to evaluate the rates of detection of four common high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) types using first-void urine paired with vaginal self-obtained samples in a nonvaccinated population of pregnant women. We also aimed to compare these results with a matched nonpregnant group in order to test the applicability of self-sampled hr-HPV cervical cancer screening during antenatal visits. Materials & methods: Samples from 550 pregnant women were subjected to hr-HPV-16, -18, -31 and -45 type detection by inhouse PCR and compared with 250 paired urine, vaginal and cervical samples from an age-matched cohort of nonpregnant women. Results: Comparing overall hr-HPV prevalence in urine and vaginal samples between pregnant (15 out of 550; 2.7%) and nonpregnant women (eight out of 250; 3.2%) for each HPV type revealed no significant differences. All paired urine/vaginal samples were both positive for the same type of hr-HPV and there was no positive urine sample with the other samples being negative. Conclusion: hr-HPV detection in pregnant women using self-obtained urine and vaginal samples seems to be a feasible cervical cancer screening method.

Interest of human papillomavirus DNA quantification and genotyping in paired cervical and urine samples to detect cervical lesions

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is caused by persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). Conventional human papillomavirus (HPV) testing requires cervical sampling. However, vaginal and urine self-sampling methods are more acceptable for patients and result in increased participation when they are available in screening programs. In this context, we have developed a non-invasive screening method via the detection of HPV DNA in urine samples.

PURPOSE

To compare HPV viral loads and genotypes in paired cervical and urine samples, and to assess correlation between virological and cytological results in women seeking gynecological consultation.

METHODS

Paired urine and cervical specimens were collected and analyzed from 230 of 245 women participating in the previously described prospective PapU study. HPV DNA detection and quantification were performed using a real-time PCR method with short fragment PCR primers. Genotyping was carried out using the INNO-LiPA HPV genotyping assay.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HPV in the 230 paired urine and cervical smear samples was 42 and 49 %, respectively. Overall agreement for HPV positivity and negativity between the paired samples was 90 % (κ = 0.80). High HPV viral load in both cervical and urine samples was associated with cytological abnormalities. HPV-positive women were mostly infected with HR-HPV types. The agreement between high- and low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) detection in both samples was 97 % (κ = 0.95 for HR-HPV and κ = 0.97 for LR-HPV).

CONCLUSIONS

High concordance rates for HPV-DNA quantification and high/low-risk HPV genotyping in paired urine/cervical samples suggest that urinary HPV DNA testing could be useful for cervical lesion screening.

Comparison of human papillomavirus detections in urine, vulvar, and cervical samples from women attending a colposcopy clinic

While urine-based sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) is being explored as a simple and noninvasive approach for cervical cancer screening, data comparing HPV genotyping in urine and those in cellular sampling of the cervix and vulva, and their correlation with rigorously confirmed cervical disease status, are sparse. We performed HPV genotyping on voided-urine and clinician-collected vulvar and cervical samples from 72 women undergoing colposcopy. Although urine-based HPV carcinogenic HPV detection was lower (58.3%) than cervical (73.6%) and vulvar (72.1%) detection (P = 0.05 and 0.07, respectively), the agreement of urine HPV with cervical and vulvar HPV was moderate (kappa = 0.55) and substantial (kappa = 0.62), respectively. Urine-based carcinogenic HPV detection had a clinical sensitivity of 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 60.7 to 93.5) and a specificity of 53.3% (95% CI = 37.9 to 68.3) for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2/3 (CIN2/3) on histology; 90.0% of CIN3 was positive for urine HPV. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity values for vulvar sampling were 92% (95% CI = 74 to 99) and 40.5% (95% CI = 25.6 to 56.7), and those for cervical sampling were 96.2% (95% CI = 80.4 to 99.9) and 40% (95% CI = 25.7 to 55.7), respectively. HPV16 was the most common carcinogenic genotype detectable in 25% of urine, 33.8% of vulvar, and 31.9% of cervical samples overall, with prevalence increasing with cervical disease grade, regardless of the sampling method. Stronger cervical HPV PCR signal strengths were associated with increased frequency of urine HPV detection. In summary, the relatively lower detection rates but comparable clinical performance of urine-based HPV sampling underscore the need for larger studies to evaluate urine-based sampling for cervical cancer screening, epidemiologic studies, and postvaccination HPV disease surveillance.

Monitoring human papillomavirus prevalence in urine samples: a review

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause of cervical cancer, and many countries now offer vaccination against HPV to girls by way of government-funded national immunization programs. Monitoring HPV prevalence in adolescents could offer a near-term biological measure of vaccine impact, and urine sampling may be an attractive large-scale method that could be used for this purpose. Our objective was to provide an overview of the literature on HPV DNA detection in urine samples, with an emphasis on adolescents. We searched the PubMed database using the terms “HPV” and “urine” and identified 21 female and 14 male study populations in which HPV prevalence in urine samples was reported, four of which included only asymptomatic female adolescents. We provide herein an overview of the recruitment setting, age, urine sampling procedure, lesion type, HPV assay, and HPV prevalence in urine samples and other urogenital samples for the studies included in this review. In female study populations, concordance for any HPV type and type-specific concordance in paired urine and cervical samples are provided in addition to sensitivity and specificity. We concluded that few studies on HPV prevalence in urine samples have been performed in asymptomatic female adolescent populations but that urine samples may be a useful alternative to cervical samples to monitor changes in HPV prevalence in females in the post-HPV vaccination era. However, care should be taken when extrapolating HPV findings from urine samples to the cervix. In males, urine samples do not seem to be optimal for monitoring HPV prevalence due to a low human genomic DNA content and HPV DNA detection rate compared to other urogenital sites. In each situation the costs and benefits of HPV DNA detection in urine compared to alternative monitoring options should be carefully considered.

Prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) among college going girls using self collected urine samples from Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu

PURPOSE

The study aimed to identify the status of HPV infection among young sexually unexposed girls from Tiruchriapalli district, Tamilnadu, India.

METHODS

The distribution of HPV genotypes was evaluated by PCR DNA genotyping after self sampling from 246 study subjects.

RESULTS

Positivity for HPV DNA was reported among 9.2% of the study subjects. The most frequently detected HPV type was HPV 16 (0.8%) followed by HPV 11 (0.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the age did not seem to be a cofactor for HPV infection and nevertheless, sexual intercourse is an important factor for HPV infection. Moreover, these results demonstrate that HPV detection performed in self collected samples may be important to appraise better preventive strategies and monitor the influence of vaccination programmes within the population.

Human papillomavirus genotype detection and viral load in paired genital and urine samples from both females and males

The ability to detect type-specific high risk HPV (HR-HPV) infections in samples from females and males is important for monitoring the epidemiology of HPV and the impact of vaccination. Type-specific detection concordance between paired urine and genital samples from females (n = 264) undergoing routine colposcopy and males (n = 88) attending a genito-urinary medicine clinic was evaluated using an in-house genotyping assay. The overall inter-rater agreement (κ) was 0.781 for female pairs and 0.346 for male pairs. Female urine had sensitivity for detection of HPV16/18 and HR-HPV of 75% and 84%, respectively, while male urine had sensitivities of 13% and 28%, respectively. Genital samples had a higher HPV DNA copy number than urine although a small proportion (10%) of urine samples had a higher copy number than the corresponding genital sample. The proportion of females with normal cytology positive for HPV16/18 was 19%, increasing to 57% in moderate or severely dyskaryotic samples. The same trend was seen in the corresponding urine (19-43%) compounded by the reduced sensitivity of this sample type. The HPV16 viral load in female genital samples, but not in urine, was weakly associated with cervical disease stage. Despite reduced sensitivity, urine appears to be an appropriate surrogate sample for type-specific HPV detection in females for epidemiological objectives. The lower sensitivity and lack of association between viral load and disease stage in urine suggest that urine may not be useful for clinical management of HPV infection. The utility of urine for type-specific detection in males is less certain.

Estimation of the epidemiological burden of human papillomavirus-related cancers and non-malignant diseases in men in Europe: a review

Background

The role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in malignant and non-malignant genital diseases in women is well known and the corresponding epidemiological burden has been widely described. However, less is known about the role of HPV in anal, penile and head and neck cancer, and the burden of malignant and non-malignant HPV-related diseases in men. The objective of this review is to estimate the epidemiological burden of HPV-related cancers and non-malignant diseases in men in Europe.

Methods

The annual number of new HPV-related cancers in men in Europe was estimated using Eurostat population data and applying cancer incidence rates published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The number of cancer cases attributable to HPV, and specifically to HPV16/18, was calculated based on the most relevant prevalence estimates. The annual number of new cases of genital warts was calculated from the most robust European studies; and latest HPV6/11 prevalence estimates were then applied. A literature review was also performed to retrieve exhaustive data on HPV infection at all anatomical sites under study, as well as incidence and prevalence of external genital warts, recurrent respiratory papillomatosis and HPV-related cancer trends in men in Europe.

Results

A total of 72, 694 new cancer cases at HPV-related anatomical sites were estimated to occur each year in men in Europe. 17,403 of these cancer cases could be attributable to HPV, with 15,497 of them specifically attributable to HPV16/18. In addition, between 286,682 and 325,722 new cases of genital warts attributable to HPV6/11were estimated to occur annually in men in Europe.

Conclusions

The overall estimated epidemiological burden of HPV-related cancers and non-malignant diseases is high in men in Europe. Approximately 30% of all new cancer cases attributable to HPV16/18 that occur yearly in Europe were estimated to occur in men. As in women, the vast majority of HPV-positive cancer in men is related to HPV16/18, while almost all HPV-related non-malignant diseases are due to HPV6/11. A substantial number of these malignant and non-malignant diseases may potentially be prevented by quadrivalent HPV vaccination.

Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in urine. A review of the literature

The detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in urine, a specimen easily obtained by a non-invasive self-sampling method, has been the subject of a considerable number of studies. This review provides an overview of 41 published studies; assesses how different methods and settings may contribute to the sometimes contradictory outcomes; and discusses the potential relevance of using urine samples in vaccine trials, disease surveillance, epidemiological studies, and specific settings of cervical cancer screening. Urine sampling, storage conditions, sample preparation, DNA extraction, and DNA amplification may all have an important impact on HPV DNA detection and the form of viral DNA that is detected. Possible trends in HPV DNA prevalence in urine could be inferred from the presence of risk factors or the diagnosis of cervical lesions. HPV DNA detection in urine is feasible and may become a useful tool but necessitates further improvement and standardization.

Age-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in males: a global review

PURPOSE

Global data on age-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in males, especially for oncogenic HPV types 16 and 18, are essential for future efforts to prevent HPV-related diseases, including expanded access to HPV prophylactic vaccines for boys and young men.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed publications was conducted to summarize worldwide data on genital HPV-DNA prevalence in men. Studies using polymerase chain reaction or hybrid capture detection assays were included.

RESULTS

Approximately 6,600 abstracts were identified. Of them, 64 reported age-specific HPV prevalence and were included in the review. Of these, 38 were from populations at high risk of HPV infections, such as sexually transmitted infection clinic attendees, human immunodeficiency virus-positive males, and male partners of women with HPV infection or abnormal cytology. The largest proportions of studies were from Europe (38%) and North America (25%), with smaller proportions from Central and South America (19%), Asia (11%), and Africa (5%). Across all regions, data on HPV prevalence were generally limited to men >18 years of age. HPV prevalence was high among sexually active men in all regions but with considerable variation, from 1% to 84% among low-risk men and from 2% to 93% among high-risk men. Peak HPV prevalence spanned a wide range of ages and was generally not concentrated in the younger age groups. Age-specific prevalence curves were relatively flat or declined only slightly following peak prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

Genital HPV infection in men varies widely, both between and within high- and low-risk groups and by geographic region. Compared with that in women, HPV prevalence in men seems to peak at slightly older ages and remains constant or decreases slightly with increasing age, suggesting persistent HPV infection or a higher rate of reinfection.

Urine HPV-DNA detection for cervical cancer screening: prospects and prejudices

Oncogenic types of human papilloma viruses (HPVs) have been established to be the causative agents for cervical cancers and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). The clinical application of molecular tests for HPV detection for screening purposes has been of considerable interest. DNA amplification methods allow the use of self-collected samples (including urine) from material collected away from the original disease site. For screening of cervical pathology, detection of HPV-DNA in urine would be useful only if it represents cervical HPV infection and/or HPV-related cervical pathology. We conducted a review of the literature in order to ascertain: (1) if urine is an adequate sample for HPV-detection; (2) whether sensitive techniques are available for HPV-detection in urine and (3) if detection of HPV in urine truly represents cervical infection/pathology. The review process consisted of assembling facts and analysing the published literature on the following facts: anatomical considerations of the lower genital and the lower urinary tract, biological behaviour of HPV and its shedding behaviour, technical issues regarding sample collection, processing and HPV-DNA assay systems, concordance rates of HPV-DNA detection and their type specificity in the paired samples (urine and cervical scrapes) obtained in different clinico-epidemiological settings and comparative detection rates of HSILs in the paired samples.

Behavior in early adolescence and risk of human papillomavirus infection as a young adult: results from a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the utility of a risk factor-based approach to human papillomavirus catch-up vaccination.

METHODS

Data from waves I and III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health were examined to determine the association between adolescent characteristics and future human papillomavirus infection. Analysis was restricted to 3181 female subjects who were >12 years of age when risk factors were assessed in wave I (1994-1995) and who underwent human papillomavirus testing as young adults in wave III (2001-2002). The main outcome of interest was a positive test result for >or=1 of 4 human papillomavirus types (human papillomavirus-6, -11, -16, or -18) targeted by the human papillomavirus vaccine currently available in the United States. Separate analyses were performed for sexually active and virginal adolescents. Poststratification sampling weights were used to generate nationally representative estimates.

RESULTS

Although nearly one half (43%) of the female adolescents were sexually active in wave I, adolescent sexual activity status was not associated with future detection of vaccine-specific human papillomavirus infection. Furthermore, for both virginal and sexually active adolescents, none of the assessed risk factors was associated with increased odds of future vaccine-specific human papillomavirus infection in multivariate models. Similar results were obtained when all high-risk human papillomavirus types were assessed as the outcome measure.

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioral risk factors assessed during adolescence are inadequate predictors of future infection with vaccine-type human papillomavirus. A risk factor-based approach to human papillomavirus catch-up vaccination is unlikely to be an effective implementation strategy.

The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in paired urine and cervical smear samples of HIV-infected women

BACKGROUND

HIV-infected women are at increased risk for cervical dysplasia. Cervical dysplasia is caused by persistent infections with certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV). Conventional testing for genital HPV infections requires cervical cytology. A non-invasive screening method by detection of HPV DNA in urine samples is preferable but is not a routine practice.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence and concordance of HPV in paired urine and cervical smear samples and cytological results of Pap smears in HIV-infected women.

STUDY DESIGN

Paired urine and cervical smear samples were collected from 27 HIV-infected women.

RESULTS

The HPV prevalence in urine and cervical smear samples was 81.5% and 51.9%, respectively (p = 0.01). The concordance for HPV positivity and negativity between urine and cervical smear samples is 71%. Seven women (25.9%) had an abnormal cervical smear of Pap II or higher. In all urine samples from these cases HPV DNA was detected.

CONCLUSION

In the present study we show that the HPV prevalence in urine and cervical smear samples of HIV-infected women is high and HPV test results are highly concordant. Therefore, urine samples can be used as medium for HPV testing. HPV testing in urine samples is a simple, reliable, non-invasive screening method.

Using risk factors to predict human papillomavirus infection: implications for targeted vaccination strategies in young adult women

Targeting human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines to sub-populations most likely to benefit could be necessary if sufficient financing is not available for comprehensive immunization. Using data from 3276 sexually active young adult women in Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, we investigated the feasibility of using behavioral risk factors to target sub-populations for HPV vaccination. We found associations between specific risk factors and vaccine-type-specific HPV infection (OR 1.7-2.1), and the likelihood of having HPV increased with increasing numbers of risk factors. However, no threshold number of risk factors predicted HPV infection with adequate specificity and sensitivity. Furthermore, at a population level, our analyses indicated that targeted approaches to HPV vaccination using specific risk factors were a poor strategy for vaccine implementation as they would exclude up to 80% of the otherwise eligible population from vaccination. Our results support implementation of comprehensive HPV vaccination strategies.

Human papillomavirus detection by penile site in young men from Kenya

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on whether sampling from the penile shaft or urethra increases detection of penile HPV infection in men beyond that found in the glans and coronal sulcus.

METHODS

Within a randomized clinical trial, a validation study of penile sampling was conducted in Kisumu, Kenya. Young men (18-24 years) were invited to provide penile exfoliated cells using prewetted Dacron swabs to determine the best site for HPV detection. beta-Globin gene PCR and HPV DNA type GP5+/6+ PCR status were ascertained from 3 anatomical sites.

RESULTS

A total of 98 young HIV-seronegative, uncircumcised men participated. Penile HPV prevalence varied by anatomical site: 50% in penile exfoliated cells from the glans, coronal sulcus, and inner foreskin tissue; 43% in the shaft and external foreskin tissue; and 18% in the urethra (P <0.0001). For each anatomical site, over 87% of samples were beta-globin positive. Beyond that found in the glans/coronal sulcus, urethral sampling resulted in no increase in HPV positivity and shaft sampling resulted in an additional 7.3% of overall HPV positivity. The prevalence of high-risk HPV positivity varied by anatomical site: 39% in glans/coronal sulcus, 31% in shaft, and 13% in the urethra (P <0.0001). HPV 16 was the most common type identified.

DISCUSSION

Penile HPV prevalence was approximately 50% among young men in Kisumu, Kenya. Urethral sampling for HPV detection in men added no sensitivity for HPV detection over that found from sampling the glans/coronal sulcus and penile shaft. These data will help inform studies on HPV transmission dynamics, and on the efficacy of HPV prophylactic vaccines on penile HPV carriage in men.

Promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in urine from patients with cervical neoplasia

We examined the feasibility of using detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in combination with the presence of aberrantly methylated genes (DAPK1, RARB, TWIST1, and CDH13) for urine-based cervical cancer screening. Urine samples from 129 Senegalese women, aged 35 years or older, 110 with (same day) biopsy-proven cervical neoplasia [cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN-1): n = 9; CIN-2-3/carcinoma in situ (CIS): n = 29; invasive cervical cancer (ICC): n = 72], and 19 without cervical neoplasia on biopsy were examined. Hypermethylation of at least one of the four genes identified 62% of ICC and 28% of CIN-2-3/CIS and was present in only 4% of CIN-1 or normal urines. High-risk HPV DNA was detected in urine in 70% of those with biopsy-proven ICC, 59% of those with CIN-2-3/CIS on biopsy, 44% of those with CIN-1 on biopsy, and only 11% of women negative for cervical neoplasia on biopsy. Urine-based detection of either high-risk HPV or hypermethylation of any of the four genes identified 84% of ICC, 64% of CIN-2-3/CIS, 44% of CIN-1, but only 19% of women negative for cervical neoplasia. The sensitivity for detection of CIN-2-3/CIS/ICC by high-risk HPV DNA or aberrant DNA methylation of four genes seems to be comparable to that of an exfoliated cervical cytology. This study shows the potential feasibility of using molecular markers detected in urine for cervical cancer screening.

Self-Collected Samples for Testing of Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

To investigate the role of self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as an alternative to cervical cancer screening by clinicians (i.e., Papanicolaou [Pap] test).

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and other sources for evidence related to the efficacy and feasibility of HPV DNA self-collection.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies were identified. In 22 comparisons across 19 studies, the concordance between samples collected by patients and those obtained by clinicians was reasonably high in the majority of cases. Women in many countries across wide age ranges were successful in collecting samples for HPV DNA testing. In four studies, the quality of the cytology from patient samples was as good as clinician samples, with more than 95% of samples yielding HPV DNA results. The studies that examined acceptability found that women were generally very positive about collecting their own samples, although some concerns were noted. No study evaluated the effect of HPV DNA self-sampling on screening participation rates, early detection, survival, or quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-sampling for HPV DNA testing is a viable screening option, but there is insufficient evidence to conclude that self-sampling for HPV DNA testing is an alternative to the Pap test. Although HPV DNA testing using self-collected samples holds promise for use in under-resourced areas or for women who are reluctant to participate in Pap testing programs, the evidence supporting it is limited. Further definitive research is needed to provide a solid evidence base to inform the use of self-sampling for HPV DNA testing for the purpose of increasing screening rates, especially in women who are never or seldom screened.

The optimal anatomic sites for sampling heterosexual men for human papillomavirus (HPV) detection: the HPV detection in men study

Background. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in men contributes to infection and cervical disease in women as well as to disease in men. This study aimed to determine the optimal anatomic site(s) for HPV detection in heterosexual men.Methods. A cross-sectional study of HPV infection was conducted in 463 men from 2003 to 2006. Urethral, glans penis/coronal sulcus, penile shaft/prepuce, scrotal, perianal, anal canal, semen, and urine samples were obtained. Samples were analyzed for sample adequacy and HPV DNA by polymerase chain reaction and genotyping. To determine the optimal sites for estimating HPV prevalence, site-specific prevalences were calculated and compared with the overall prevalence. Sites and combinations of sites were excluded until a recalculated prevalence was reduced by <5% from the overall prevalence.Results. The overall prevalence of HPV was 65.4%. HPV detection was highest at the penile shaft (49.9% for the full cohort and 47.9% for the subcohort of men with complete sampling), followed by the glans penis/coronal sulcus (35.8% and 32.8%) and scrotum (34.2% and 32.8%). Detection was lowest in urethra (10.1% and 10.2%) and semen (5.3% and 4.8%) samples. Exclusion of urethra, semen, and either perianal, scrotal, or anal samples resulted in a <5% reduction in prevalence.Conclusions. At a minimum, the penile shaft and the glans penis/coronal sulcus should be sampled in heterosexual men. A scrotal, perianal, or anal sample should also be included for optimal HPV detection.

Urine versus brushed samples in human papillomavirus screening: study in both genders

AIM

To investigate whether urine is a good medium for screening and whether there is a correlation between the amount of extracted DNA and human papillomavirus (HPV)-positivity.

METHODS

In the present study, 30 first-voided urine (FVU) specimens and 20 urethroglandular swabs using cervex-brushes from male partners of HPV-positive patients, and 31 FVU specimens and 100 liquid-based cervix cytology leftovers sampled with cervix-brushes from HPV-positive women were examined for the presence of beta-globin. Oncogenic HPV were detected using type-specific PCR.

RESULTS

beta-globin was found in all the brushed samples, whereas it was found in only 68.9% of the FVU specimens. HPV-PCR was positive in 60.0% of the male brushes, in 29% of the female brushes and in 0% of the male FVU specimens. DNA concentration was, respectively, 0.9998 ng/microL, 37.0598 ng/microL and 0.0207 ng/microL.

CONCLUSION

Urine is not a good tool for HPV detection, probably because the low DNA concentration reflects a low amount of collected cells. beta-globin is measurable in FVU by real time quantitative PCR, but the DNA concentration is lower compared to brush sampling for both genders. beta-globin-positivity of urethral and cervical swabs is 100%, showing a higher mean concentration of DNA, leading to a higher detection rate of HPV. This is the first article linking DNA-concentration to the presence of HPV.

Pad - a new self-collection device for human papillomavirus

This study was designed to determine the accuracy and agreement of a self-collection method using pad for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. One hundred and thirty-four patients at university hospitals voluntarily participated in the accuracy study, and 314 volunteers participated in the agreement study at local clinics. DNA was extracted and amplified using HPV L1 consensus primers designed for the direct sequencing. In the accuracy study, all samples were probed via histological examinations. With regard to the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL), self-collection pad sampling displays sensitivity, of 76.9%, and specificity, of 93.3%. Three hundred and fourteen self-collection pad samples and the concurrent physicians' samples showed a 97.8% agreement, with a Kappa value of 0.9200. A new self-collection pad for the detection of HPV DNA appears to constitute an easy, rapid, and convenient alternative method for the cervical cancer screening of many women with the virtue of being incredible readily accessible.

Human Papillomavirus Prevalence and Type Distribution in Male Anogenital Sites and Semen

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is sexually transmitted and causes cervical cancer. Although HPV can infect men and women, little is known about infection in men. Specifically, the prevalence of type-specific HPV infection and the distribution of infections by anogenital anatomic site in men are incompletely characterized.

METHODS

We tested 463 men ages 18 to 40 years for HPV at the glans/corona, penile shaft, scrotum, urethra, perianal area, anal canal, and in a semen sample. Eligible men acknowledged no history of genital warts and had sexual intercourse with a woman within the past year. HPV testing by PCR and reverse line blot genotyping for 37 types was conducted on each of the specimens from the seven sampling sites.

RESULTS

When HPV results from any sampling site were considered, 237 (51.2%) men were positive for at least one oncogenic or nononcogenic HPV type, and another 66 (14.3%) men were positive for an unclassified HPV type. The types with the highest prevalence were HPV-16 (11.4%) and 84 (10.6%). External genital samples (glans/corona, shaft, and scrotum) were more likely than anal samples to contain oncogenic HPV (25.1% versus 5.0%). HPV-positive penile shaft and glans/corona samples were also more likely to be infected with multiple HPV types than other sites.

CONCLUSIONS

More complete anogenital sampling and sensitive detection for 37 HPV types resulted in a higher HPV prevalence in primarily asymptomatic men than reported previously. The penile shaft was the site most likely to be HPV positive and harbored the greatest proportion of multiple type and oncogenic infections. These results have implications for research of HPV among men and transmission between partners.

Cervical Cancer Screening for the Reluctant - HPV Testing of Air-Dried Vaginal Discharge

Despite the availability of the PAP test, cervical cancer continues to cause considerable morbidity and mortality. Many women default cervical cytology for a variety of reasons. This demands the development of alternative screening strategies, such as HPV testing on self-procured cervical-vaginal specimens in order to capture this group of women. We investigated the self-procured air-dried vaginal discharge for HPV testing. We recruited 82 patients with HPV-associated cervical lesions and 36 patients with normal cervical pathology. Participants were briefed and informed consents obtained. Each was then given a kit containing written instructions, a slim napkin, an empty zip-lock plastic bag for soiled napkin specimen, and a return envelope. After wearing the napkin for the day, the patient removes it, dries it, and returns the specimen by mail. Specimens were batched and a 0.5 cm area of each stained napkin was tested for HPV by PCR. Specimens from all 26 patients with high-grade (CIN 2 or above) HPV-induced cervical lesions and 4 of 36 normal subjects tested positive for HPV, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 88.9%, respectively. We propose offering to women who refuse cervical cytology the alternative screening strategy of testing of self-procured air-dried vaginal discharge for HPV. This method of cervical cancer screening is also suitable for people living in remote regions of the world.

Penile, urethral, and seminal sampling for diagnosis of human papillomavirus infection in men

Methods that used specimens from three genital sites (penile brushing [PB], urethral brushing [UB], and the retrieval of semen [SE]) from 50 men were examined for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection. The rates of detection by PB, UB, SE, PB and UB, and PB and SE were 88.9%, 50.0%, 33.3%, 100%, and 97.2%, respectively. The use of PB and UB appears to be the most accurate method; as an alternative to UB, the use of SE with PB could be used to improve the rate of HPV DNA detection in men.

Primary screening for cervical cancer through self sampling

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of community health agents (CHAs) to instruct women living in poor rural areas in obtaining self-collected cervical samples and compare the high-risk HPV (hrHPV) hybrid capture (HC) results obtained to those for gynecologist-collected samples.

METHODS

After a one-day training, CHAs visited sexually active women, instructing each in the use of collection brush and the Universal Collection Medium tube. One week thereafter, a gynecologist collected cervical samples from, and performed colposcopies on, the same women. A single reference lab performed all HCs.

RESULTS

878 women (Age: 15-69 years) participated. Among self-collected samples, hrHPV prevalence was 33.9% (95% CI: 30.8%-37%), compared with 28.6% (95% CI: 27%-30%) among gynecologist-collected samples. However, 9.3% of the patients were HPV HC II-positive in the self-collected sample and HPV HC II-negative in the gynecologist-collected samples (95% CI: 7.38%-11.22%), whereas 4% tested positive in gynecologist-collected samples and negative in self-collected samples (95% CI: 2.7%-5.3%) (P<0.01; kappa=0.7). Of 9 cases of histologically-confirmed, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, self-collected and provider-collected samples missed one each.

CONCLUSION

Self-collected vaginal sampling could be made an additional CHA function under existing program conditions, improving access to cervical cancer screening in poor rural settings.

Human Papillomavirus Infection Among Sexually Active Young Women in the United States: Implications for Developing a Vaccination Strategy

OBJECTIVES

Population-level data on prevalence and distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) types in the United States are necessary to guide optimal vaccination strategies.

STUDY

Urine specimens from 3262 women ages 18 to 25 in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Wave III) were tested and typed for HPV. Poststratification sampling weights generated nationally representative estimates.

RESULTS

Overall HPV prevalence was 26.9% and as high as 14.3% among women with 1 lifetime partner but did not vary by geographic region. High-risk types were detected in 20%; approximately 10% were infected with types in current candidate vaccines. HPV infection was independently associated with mixing sex with alcohol, a black partner, >3 lifetime sex partners, being single, and illegal drug use. Having a current sex partner and receptive oral sex were inversely associated with HPV.

CONCLUSION

HPV prevalence was high throughout the country, even among women with only 1 lifetime partner, suggesting early and widespread rather than targeted immunization of young women.

Evaluation of high-risk human papillomavirus types PCR detection in paired urine and cervical samples of women with abnormal cytology

BACKGROUND

During the last decade, increasing efforts have focused on HPV detection in self-obtained samples, to increase the overall proportion of patients participating in cervical cancer screening procedures.

OBJECTIVES

A clinical evaluation study of an optimized protocol for PCR detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types in urine compared with cervical samples in consecutive women referred to the colposcopy clinic with abnormal cervical cytology.

STUDY DESIGN

Paired urine and cervical specimens were collected from 100 consecutive women referred to the colposcopy clinic with abnormal cervical cytology and normal urine parameters. In-house and a commercial PCR method for the detection of HPV types 16 and 18, and a commercial multiplex PCR for HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, and 33 were performed. All HPV cervix-positive/urine-negative paired urine samples were spiked with serial dilutions of cell lines infected with HPV 16 or 18 to test the sensitivity of HPV detection in these urine samples.

RESULTS

In all but two cases HPV type 16 was detected. In cancer cases, the urine/cervix HPV detection sensitivity was 88.8%; in cases with high-grade lesions it was 76.5%; and in cases with low-grade lesions it was 45.5%. In all concordant cases the same HPV type was detected in both samples. The urine/cervix HPV detection sensitivity was higher when urine samples contained two or more epithelial cells per field in urine microscopy. HPV detection in 9 cervix-positive but urine-negative urine samples spiked with serial dilutions of HPV-positive cell lines showed that in these cases urine PCR inhibitors did not affect PCR amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher urine/cervix HPV detection sensitivity in cancer and high-grade lesions suggests that urine testing could be used to detect HPV mainly when these lesions are present.

Comparison between the Hybrid Capture II test and a PCR-based human papillomavirus detection method for diagnosis and posttreatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the major cause of cervical cancer and its precursor, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and HPV testing has therefore been proposed for improved triaging and follow-up of women treated for CIN. We compared two common HPV DNA detection tests (Hybrid Capture II [HCII] and PCR-enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) using the primers GP5+/GP6+ followed by HPV typing with reverse dot blot hybridization) for sensitivity and specificity for detection of CIN and of CIN recurrence after treatment. Two hundred and thirty-nine women referred to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in Västerås, Sweden, were enrolled because of atypical Pap smears; 177 of these were later treated for dysplasia by conization or loop diathermy. Samples for HPV DNA testing were taken before and 4 to 6 months after treatment. There was substantial agreement between the HCII and PCR-EIA (kappa, 0.70 before treatment and 0.72 after treatment). The sensitivity for histopathologically confirmed CIN III was 100.0% for PCR-EIA and 95.6% for HCII. For patients with CIN II or worse (CIN II+), the sensitivities were 92.9% (PCR-EIA) and 91.8% (HCII). The specificities for CIN II+ in the pretreatment setting were 30.4% for PCR-EIA and 24.1% for HCII. After treatment, the sensitivities for CIN III in cytology were 100.0% by both methods, and for CIN II+, sensitivities were 80.0% by both methods. The specificities for CIN II+ in the posttreatment setting were 83.5% for PCR and 85.4% for HCII. In conclusion, the sensitivities of both PCR-EIA and HCII are high and almost equal, suggesting that both methods are suitable as tools for detection and posttreatment follow-up of CIN II-III.

Human papillomavirus DNA detection and typing in male urine samples from a high-risk population from Argentina

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the first void urine (FVU) as a non-invasive sampling method for HPV detection and genotyping in a high-risk population. Men presenting with HPV associated penile lesions or HPV positive partners attending a urological department in La Plata, Argentina were enrolled for HPV detection and genotyping. DNA from 185 first-void urine samples was evaluated for the presence of HPV by nested polymerase chain reaction using MY09/11 and GP05/06 primers. The viral genotype was analyzed by means of the single-stranded conformation polymorphisms (SSCP) method. Seventy-three percent (135/185) of the FVU specimens were positive for HPV-DNA. The viral prevalence in patients with HPV-DNA positive partners was 68.8% (77/112), and 79.5% (58/73) of patients with penile lesions were found to be HPV positive. The most frequent viral type was HPV-11 (26.7%), followed by HPV-6 (23%), HPV-16 (21.5%), HPV-18 (6%), and HPV-31 (4.4%). In this study, 11.1% (15/135) of the HPV positive specimens were double infections. These results indicate that high-risk HPVs can be found in clinical lesions in a high percentage (43.8%), as simple or double infections. In this sense, the male population represents an important reservoir for the virus and may play a role in the transmission and perpetuation of the infection in the general population. The method described below provides a tool for detection and typing of HPV-DNA using samples obtained by non-invasive techniques and thus easy to obtain.

Optimization of PCR based detection of human papillomavirus DNA from urine specimens

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervical cancer. Current screening requires a yearly pelvic exam and Pap smear. However, these procedures are impractical for screening all women at risk for disease. Urine sampling has been successfully utilized to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoreae (NG) infections and has been considered for HPV DNA detection by several investigators. However, no study to date has been performed to specifically optimize HPV detection in urine.

OBJECTIVES

To compare handling and extraction techniques in order to optimize the HPV specific PCR system in urine specimens.

STUDY DESIGN

Examination of 10 characteristics that may contribute to PCR inhibition in urine was performed utilizing 10SG mulitstixs. Five different DNA extraction methods were compared in spiked specimens and in 10 clinical specimens. After the optimal extraction technique was identified, concentration of the sample with and without prior dilution was compared to the original protocol. Lastly, specimen handling was compared between immediate processing, refrigerating overnight, or freezing overnight.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

the presence of protein in urine enhanced amplification while nitrites decreased amplification. Of the extraction methods tested, the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit demonstrated the best amplification from urine samples spiked with HPV DNA and clinical specimens. The addition of a dilution step and a concentration step before applying the Qiagen protocol further increased amplification of beta-globin (from 50 to 63%) and the HPV L1 gene (from 13 to 33%). Lastly, refrigerating the specimens at 4 degrees C overnight appears to produce better amplification (62% beta-globin and 17% HPV positive) than either immediate processing (46% beta-globin and 13% HPV+) or freezing the specimen for 24h prior to processing (46% beta-globin and 10% HPV+). In these studies, amplification was low despite optimization. Additional improvements are required prior to clinical application of a urine-based HPV DNA detection system.

Optimal Cutoff of the Hybrid Capture II Human Papillomavirus Test for Self-Collected Vaginal, Vulvar, and Urine Specimens in a Colposcopy Referral Population

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the optimal relative light unit ratio, as a measure of viral load, of the Hybrid Capture II human papillomavirus (HPV) test in self-collected specimens for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).

METHODS

Two hundred women referred for colposcopy with abnormal cytologic, self-collected vaginal and vulvar swabs and urine for HPV testing. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method was used to estimate optimal cutoffs for the Hybrid Capture II test. The reference standard was colposcopy, with directed biopsy as required.

RESULTS

The estimated optimal cutoffs of the relative light unit ratio for detecting CIN 2 or higher for urine, vulvar, and vaginal samples gave sensitivities of 72.4%, 82.8%, and 89.0% and specificities of 57.0%, 52.1%, and 55.9%, respectively. At the manufacturer's recommended 1.0 cutoff, sensitivities were 44.8%, 62.1%, and 86.2% for urine, vulvar, and vaginal samples, with specificities of 69.7%, 62.7%, and 53.5%, respectively. The likelihood ratios (likelihood of being truly positive after a positive test result) were similar for the optimal and the 1.0 cutoff.

CONCLUSIONS

The ROC curve methods did not improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of the Hybrid Capture II test compared with the 1.0 relative light unit ratio cutoff.

Detection of human papillomavirus in urine and cervical swabs from patients with invasive cervical cancer

Despite the high prevalence of both human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and cervical cancer among Zimbabwean women, the ability to test for HPV infection of the uterine cervix is limited by a lack of an easy sample collection method that does not require gynecological examination. The presence of HPVs in urine and cervical swab samples collected from 43 women who presented with invasive cervical cancer was investigated. HPV detection was done by means of degenerate primers in a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Typing of HPVs was done using restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. HPV was identified and typed in 98% (42/43) of cervical swabs and 72% (31/43) of paired urine samples. HPV type 16 was the most common (25/42, 59%), followed by types: 33 (13/42, 31%), 18 (6/42, 14%), and 31 (1/42, 2%). Type-specific concordance between cervical and urine samples was high (22/28, 79%). Therefore, the HPV types identified in urine samples in most cases represent the same HPV type infecting the cervical epithelium. The results suggest that urine may be a practical sample for testing of HPV urogenital infection. Further research is required before the detection of HPV in urine can be applied in the routine cervical screening programs.

Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in urine specimens from human immunodeficiency virus-positive women

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive women may represent one of the fastest-growing populations at risk for acquiring cervical cancer and thus require frequent screening. The purpose of the present studies was to validate a PCR-based urine assay by comparing detection and genotyping of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in urine samples and matching cervical swab specimens of HIV-positive women. Despite a difference in amplifiability, the prevalence of any HPV genotype (58% for the cervical swab specimens and 48% for the urine specimens) was not significantly different in this population. The levels of concordance were 70, 71, and 78% for detection of any HPV type, any high-risk HPV type, or any low-risk HPV type in the two specimen types, respectively. While instances of discordant detection were greater for the cervical swab specimens than for the urine specimens, this was not statistically significant. The distributions of HPV genotypes were similar in the cervix and the urine for the majority of types examined. Importantly, detection of HPV DNA in urine was associated with an abnormal Papanicolaou smear to the same extent that detection of HPV DNA in a cervical swab specimen was. These data provide preliminary support for the proposal to use urine testing as a primary or secondary screening tool for cervical cancer in HIV-positive women or as an epidemiological tool. Additional studies with larger sample sizes must be conducted in order to further verify these findings.

High prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in Mexican males: comparative study of penile-urethral swabs and urine samples

BACKGROUND

Although extensive information has been gathered about the prevalence and determinants of human papillomavirus infection among women, little is known about the prevalence and natural history of this infection among males.

GOAL

To investigate the potential usefulness of urine specimens to assess the presence of genital human papillomavirus DNA infection.

STUDY DESIGN

The authors conducted a study of 120 healthy men from Cuernavaca, Mexico. A urine specimen and urethral and coronal sulcus swab samples were collected and tested for human papillomavirus using the GP5+/6+ polymerase chain reaction enzyme immunoassay method.

RESULTS

In 95% of the urethral-coronal sulcus samples, the beta-globin gene was detectable, indicating adequacy of the specimen for DNA amplification; however, only 14% of the urine specimens had detectable beta-globin. Removal of inhibitors by DNA purification in a sample of subjects produced beta-globin amplification, but no increase in human papillomavirus DNA positivity was detected. Human papillomavirus DNA was not detectable in penile-urethral swab samples in any of the subjects who reported not having engaged in sexual activity but was present in 43% of men who reported sexual activity, a strong indication of the sexual transmission of human papillomavirus.

CONCLUSIONS

Human papillomavirus is a common sexually transmitted infection among Mexican males, and urine sample specimens cannot adequately detect the presence of this infection in males.

Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

BACKGROUND

Certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical samples are strongly associated with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and invasive cervical carcinoma. We determined and compared the test characteristics of testing for HPV with samples obtained by patients and with samples obtained by their physicians.

METHODS

In a consecutive series of women referred to a colposcopy clinic at a teaching hospital because of abnormalities on cervical cytologic screening, 200 agreed to collect vulvar, vaginal and urine samples for HPV testing. The physician then collected cervical samples for HPV testing, and colposcopy, with biopsy as indicated, was performed. Presence of HPV was evaluated using the hybrid capture II assay (Digene Corp., Silver Spring, Md.) with a probe cocktail for 13 carcinogenic types. Cervical specimens were also tested for HPV by polymerase chain reaction and hybridization with type-specific probes. Cervical smears for cytologic examination were obtained from all women.

RESULTS

High-grade lesions (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSIL], equivalent to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] grade 2 or 3, and adenocarcinoma) were found in 58 (29.0%) of the 200 women. Carcinogenic types of HPV were detected in the self-collected vaginal samples of 50 (86.2%) of these 58 women, in the self-collected vulvar samples of 36 (62.1%) and in the self-collected urine samples of 26 (44.8%). Carcinogenic types of HPV were detected in the cervical samples collected by physicians for 57 (98.3%) of these 58 women. The remaining 142 women (71.0%) had normal findings or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL, CIN grade 1). Test results were negative or noncarcinogenic types of HPV were detected in the self-collected vaginal samples of 76 (53.5%) of these 142 women, in the self-collected vulvar samples of 89 (62.7%) and in the self-collected urine samples of 99 (69.7%). The sensitivity for self-collected samples ranged from 44.8% to 86.2%, and the specificity from 53.5% to 69.7%. For the samples collected by physicians, the sensitivity was 98.3% and the specificity 52.1%. The self-sampling methods were generally acceptable to the women: 98.4% of respondents (126/128) deemed urine sampling acceptable, 92.9% (118/127) found vulvar sampling acceptable, and 88.2% (112/127) found vaginal sampling acceptable.

INTERPRETATION

Self-collection of samples for HPV testing was acceptable to women attending a colposcopy clinic for investigation of suspected cervical lesions and shows sufficient sensitivity to warrant further evaluation as a screening test for cervical cancer prevention programs.

Concordance of human papillomavirus in the cervix and urine among inner city adolescents

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate concordance for human papillomaviruses (HPVs) between cervix and urine in sexually active adolescents.

METHODS

Cervical swabs and urine were collected from 80 adolescents in Baltimore, MD. Specimens were tested for 34 HPVs by PCR and for cancer-associated HPVs by Hybrid Capture (HC II) Probe B. Cervical vs. urine prevalence was evaluated by logistic regression with general estimating equations. Risk factors for prevalence and viral burden were evaluated by Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively.

RESULTS

HPV prevalence by PCR, for any HPV, was very high in the cervix (90.0%) and somewhat lower in urine (75.0%) (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.34). Only one adolescent was HPV-positive in urine alone. Among HPV-PCR positives at either or both sites, concordance was 82% for presence of any HPV and 40% for specific HPV types. Multiple infections were common at both sites. On an average, HC II viral burden (relative light unit ratio) was 9-fold higher in cervix than in urine (median, 47.3 vs. 4.9; P = 0.005) but correlated poorly between the two sites of the same individual (r = 0.14). Compared with normal adolescents, those with squamous intraepithelial lesions had a much higher prevalence of HPV by HC II in cervix (100% vs. 28.6, P<0.0001) as well as in urine (86.7% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.002) and a significantly higher viral burden in the cervix (median, 141.8 vs. 7.3, P = 0.0045) but not in urine (median, 22.7 vs. 4.38; P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

There was a very high prevalence of HPV in cervix and urine of sexually active adolescents. Testing urine for HPV may be useful in epidemiologic investigations and in monitoring of infected women.