Comparative study of three methods for genotyping hepatitis C virus strains in samples from Spanish patients

Molecular Epidemiology of HCV RNA Genotype-3 in Dhaka City, Bangladesh

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a causative agent that causes chronic liver diseases worldwide. It is a little, enclosed, single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus. The recognition of the pathogenic HCV genotype is critical for the remedy of its sufferers. The aim of this study was to identify the HCV RNA genotype to decide the correct treatment of hepatitis C positive sufferers in Bangladesh. Blood samples were collected from 390 individuals and isolated RNA (60 µg) from blood plasma. Extracted RNA was used for quantitative HCV RNA, and complementary DNA (cDNA) was prepared by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conducted by reverse transcriptase enzyme. This cDNA amplified in multiplex by RT-PCR, which was performed with specific set of primers. The HCV RNA genotype was detected 297 of 390 patients. Of the 390 test samples, 200 (51.28%) samples were from males and 190 (48.71%) were from females, with age ranging from 5 to 78 years. In all, 166 of 200 male samples and 131/190 female samples were found positive for HCV. Of these 390 participants included in the study, 213 (54.61%) were identified as genotype 3 positive, 78 (20%) as genotype 1 positive, 6 (1.53%) as genotype 6 positive, and the remaining 93 (23.85%) samples were unclassified due to low/undetected viral load. In this study, we detected the highest percentage (30.89%) of genotype 3 HCV in patients aged 51 to 60 years. The results suggested that genotype 3 HCV is frequently present in Bangladesh and it is usually responses better to interferon therapy. However, genotype 1 and 6 HCV have also been found circulating in this country, which demands longer treatments and effective control measures.

Prevalence of HCV genotypes and subtypes in Southeast Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Known for its high genetic diversity and variation in genotypic presence in different regions of the world, hepatitis C virus (HCV) is estimated to infect about 71 million people globally. Selection of an appropriate therapeutic regimen largely depends on the identification of the genotype responsible for the infection. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to provide a comprehensive view of HCV genotype and subtype distribution in Southeast Asia (SEA). The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). We searched five databases without year and language restrictions. Data from 90 eligible studies involving 15,089 genotypes and 9,646 subtypes representing 10 SEA countries were analyzed. The pooled estimates showed that genotype 1 (46.8%) [95% CI, 43.2–50.4; I² = 92.77%; p < 0.001] was the most dominant HCV genotype in the region, followed by genotype 3 (23.1%) [95% CI, 19.4–27.2; I² = 93.03%; p < 0.001], genotype 6 (16.5%) [95% CI, 13.8–19.6], genotype 2 (4.6%) [95% CI, 3.5–5.9], genotype 4 (1.1%) [95% CI, 0.7–1.5] and genotype 5 (0.8%) [95% CI, 0.4–1.3]. Philippines had the highest prevalence of genotypes 1 and 2. Genotype 6 became more prevalent after year 2000. Over 40 different subtypes were identified, with subtypes 1b (26.3%), 1a (21.3%), and 3a (14.3%) being the most prevalent of all the reported subtypes. Although on a global scale, genotype 6 is considered highly prevalent in SEA, evidence from this study reveals that it is the third most prevalent genotype within the region.

Hepatitis C Treatment Outcomes for People Who Inject Drugs Treated in an Accessible Care Program Located at a Syringe Service Program

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a significant public health problem that disproportionately afflicts people who inject drugs. We describe outcomes of HCV treatment co-located within a syringe services program (SSP). Fifty-three participants started therapy, and 91% achieved sustained virologic response. SSPs provide an effective venue for HCV treatment.

Molecular Assay and Genotyping of Hepatitis C Virus among Infected Egyptian and Saudi Arabian Patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem recognized globally. HCV is a common cause of liver fibrosis that may lead to liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of HCV infection and genotyping among Egyptian and Saudi Arabian chronic patients using different molecular techniques. HCV RNA viral load was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. For HCV genotyping, RT-PCR hybridization fluorescence-based method and reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA) were used. A total of 40 anti-HCV-positive patients with chronic hepatitis C were examined for HCV RNA, genotyping, and different laboratory investigations. In the present study, HCV genotypes 4, mixed 4.1b, and 1 were detected in patients of both countries, while genotype 2 was only detected in Saudi Arabian patients. Genotyping methods for HCV showed no difference in the classification at the genotype level. With regard to HCV subtypes, INNO-LiPA assay was a reliable test in HCV genotyping for the detection of major genotypes and subtypes, while RT-PCR-based assay was a good test at the genotype level only. HCV genotype 4 was found to be the predominant genotype among Egyptian and Saudi Arabian chronic patients. In conclusion, data analysis for detecting and genotyping HCV was an important factor for understanding the epidemiology and treatment strategies of HCV among Egyptian and Saudi Arabian chronic patients.

Two unusual hepatitis C virus subtypes, 2j and 2q, in Spain: Identification by nested-PCR and sequencing of a NS5B region

Many studies have reported the use of the NS5B gene to subtype hepatitis C virus (HCV). Other HCV genes, such as HCV-5' UTR, Core (C) and E1, have also been used. In some studies, NS5B have been used together with 5'-UTR or C genes to improve genotyping results obtained using commercial procedures. Only two studies in Spain have compared molecular techniques versus commercial procedures regarding the efficacy of HCV subtyping. The aim of this study was to determine whether nested PCR and sequencing of a NS5B region was more reliable than commercial procedures to subtype HCV. We analyzed the results of HCV genotyping in [726] serum specimens collected from 2001 to 2013. From 2001 to 2011, we used PCR and INNO-LiPA hybridization or its new version Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay (471 samples). From 2012 to 2013, we used nested PCR and sequencing of a NS5B region (255 cases). This method used two pairs of primers to amplify the RNA of the sample converted to DNA by retrotranscription. The amplification product of 270 base pairs was further sequenced. To identify the subtype, the sequences obtained were compared to those in the international database: http://hcv.lanl.gov./content/sequence/, HCV/ToolsOutline.html and Geno2pheno[hcv] http://hcv.bioinf.mpi-inf.mpg.de/index.php. Nested PCR of a NS5B region and sequencing identified all but one subtype (0.4%, 1/255), differentiated all 1a subtypes from 1b subtypes, and characterized all HCV 2-4 subtypes. This approach also distinguished two subtypes, 2j and 2q, that had rarely been detected previously in Spain. However, commercial procedures failed to subtype 12.7% (60/471) of samples and to genotype 0.6% of specimens (3/471). Nested PCR and sequencing of a NS5B region improved the subtyping of HCV in comparison with classical procedures and identified two rare subtypes in Spain: 2j and 2q. However, full length genome sequencing is recommended to confirm HCV 2j and 2q subtypes.

Mixed HCV infection and reinfection in people who inject drugs--impact on therapy

The majority of new and existing cases of HCV infection in high-income countries occur among people who inject drugs (PWID). Ongoing high-risk behaviours can lead to HCV re-exposure, resulting in mixed HCV infection and reinfection. Assays used to screen for mixed infection vary widely in sensitivity, particularly with respect to their capacity for detecting minor variants (<20% of the viral population). The prevalence of mixed infection among PWID ranges from 14% to 39% when sensitive assays are used. Mixed infection compromises HCV treatment outcomes with interferon-based regimens. HCV reinfection can also occur after successful interferon-based treatment among PWID, but the rate of reinfection is low (0-5 cases per 100 person-years). A revolution in HCV therapeutic development has occurred in the past few years, with the advent of interferon-free, but still genotype-specific regiments based on direct acting antiviral agents. However, little is known about whether mixed infection and reinfection has an effect on HCV treatment outcomes in the setting of new direct-acting antiviral agents. This Review characterizes the epidemiology and natural history of mixed infection and reinfection among PWID, methodologies for detection, the potential implications for HCV treatment and considerations for the design of future studies.

Genotyping of HCV RNA reveals that 3a is the most prevalent genotype in mardan, pakistan

The clinical outcomes of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) range from acute resolving hepatitis to chronic liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Identification of the infecting virus genotype is indispensable for the exploration of many aspects of HCV infection, including epidemiology, pathogenesis, and response to antiviral therapy. 1419 individuals were screened for anti-HCV in this study, of which 166 (11.7%) were found reactive by ICT (Immunochromatographic test). These 166 anti-HCV positive and 26 normal individuals were further analyzed. RNA was extracted from serum and reverse-transcribed to cDNA and the core region of HCV genome was targeted and amplified by multiplex PCR. HCV RNA was detected in 121 individuals, of which 87 were male and 34 were female. Genotype 3a was the most prevalent among all the genotypes observed followed by 3b. Genotypes 1a, 2a, and 2b were found in 10.89%, 13.22%, and 6.61% patients, respectively. 25.41% of the HCV RNA positive samples were not typed. 6.05% of patients were found having mixed genotypes. These findings will not only help the physicians to prescribe more appropriate treatment for the HCV infection but will also draw the attention of health-related policy makers to devise strategies to curb the disease more effectively.

Evaluation of multiplex nested polymerase chain reaction for routine hepatitis C virus genotyping in egyptian patients

BACKGROUND

At least six HCV (hepatitis C virus) genotypes are unequally distributed worldwide. HCV genotyping guides the selection of treatment regimens and provides important epidemiological markers that enable the outbreak source to be traced and the spread of disease to be controlled. In Egypt, there is an increasing need for cost-effective, fast, and easily performable HCV genotyping assays.Recently, a multiplex PCR assay was developed to determine HCV genotypes. It employs genotype-specific primers, based on sequences of the entire core region and part of the 5'UTR of the genome.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we compared a simple, new, modified multiplex PCR system for HCV genotyping with a commercially available line probe assay (INNO-LiPA) that is based on reverse hybridization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum samples from chronic HCV Egyptian patients (n = 73) were genotyped using the modified multiplex PCR assay, and genotypes were verified using the INNO-LiPA HCV II assay.

RESULTS

The modified multiplex PCR method was able to type HCV-4 in 65 of 70 typeable samples (92.86%) and had 100% concordance with the INNO-LiPA assay.

CONCLUSIONS

Genotype 4 was the most prevalent genotype in our study. Based on our results, the modified multiplex nested PCR assay is a sensitive and inexpensive alternative for HCV genotyping and can be used in routine diagnostic laboratories. INNO-LiPA may be useful as a second-line assay for genotyping samples that are indeterminate by multiplex PCR. This approach will effect better treatment optimization and a reduction of the spread of HCV.

Evaluation of three different hepatitis C virus typing methods for detection of mixed-genotype infections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical applicability of an eligible assay for the true prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) mixed-genotype infections.

METHODS

A newly developed HCV genotyping method targeting all six major HCV genotypes and 12 subtypes, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and a serotyping assay were utilized for the detection of HCV mixed-genotype infections using known HCV genotypes and unknown samples.

RESULTS

In a defined mix of HCV genotypes, a genotype present at levels as low as 8.3% was detected by our newly developed assay, showing a threefold increase in sensitivity over that of direct deoxyribonucleic (DNA) sequencing. A comparative study of the accuracy among the three genotyping methods was carried out on samples obtained from 50 thalassemic patients who received multiple blood transfusions. The results showed that viruses in approximately 42% of the samples from this group were determined to be infected with mixed genotypes by our newly developed method. A serotyping assay and RFLP analysis, performed with poor results, could identify only 18% and 10% of mixed-genotype infections, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed assay may be the method of choice when detection of genotypes present at low levels in mixed-genotype infections due to its higher level of sensitivity.

[Hepatitis C virus genotyping: comparison of the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay and NS5B sequencing]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Hepatitis C virus genotyping is needed for treatment decision and monitoring. The results of a genotyping assay based on real-time PCR and TaqMan chemistry were compared with the results of NS5B region sequencing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and two sera (genotypes 1-6) were tested. Amplification and detection of viral RNA were performed with the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay targeting 5'non-coded region (5'NC) for the identification of genotypes 1 to 6 and NS5B, for 1a and 1b subtypes detection. Sequencing of 5'NC fragment was used to resolve discrepant results.

RESULTS

No indeterminate results were obtained. Concordance with NS5B sequencing was 93% (95 on 102), 96% at the genotype level (98 on 102) and 93% for genotype 1 subtyping (40 on 43). Discordant genotyping results were a 2f subtype identified as 5, a 6a typed as 1, a 3a identified as a 1-3 co-infection and a 4r identified as a 1-4 co-infection. Discordant subtyping results were 2 1b subtypes only typed as 1 and a 1e identified as 1a.

CONCLUSION

Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay is a rapid, automated and simple to interpret method for HCV genotyping. It allows the detection of possible mixed infections which might have a negative impact on therapeutic response. However, the discrepant results found in this small series underline the need for assay optimization.

Development of an improved genotyping assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus genotypes and subtypes in Pakistan

A new genotyping system was established for the specific detection of HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a-h, 5a and 6a during the course of this study. The system is based on entire core region and a part of 5' noncoding region (5'NCR) with genotype-specific primers. Genotype-specific primers were designed on the basis of 114 HCV isolates. Serum samples with known genotypes were used as positive controls to validate the assay developed and to generate PCR band patterns. Band patterns generated from the clinical serum samples from HCV patients were compared to the patterns produced from these control samples. In addition, the type-specific bands were sequenced from the test patients and control clinical samples to validate further the test results. To determine sensitivity and specificity of the assay, a total 260 samples were analyzed simultaneously by this HCV genotyping method and that developed by Ohno and Murex HCV Serotyping 1-6 Assay. The system showed 79.2% concordance with Ohno's system and 65.38% with serotyping system. Samples with discordant results were sequenced and their genotypes were determined by molecular evolutionary analysis. The data indicate that the method described in this study may offer better sensitivity and specificity for the detection directly of HCV genotypes present at low levels in HCV patient samples.

Evaluating the cost of sustained virologic response in naïve chronic hepatitis C patients treated à la carte

BACKGROUND

There is a tendency to individualize treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients depending on viral load and rapid clearance of HCV-RNA.

AIM

To evaluate the cost (euro, 2006) per sustained virologic response in naïve patients with therapy à la carte compared with standard combination therapy.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was used to compare standard therapy with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin for 24 weeks for genotype (G) 2/3, and 48 weeks for G1 and therapy à la carte with the same drugs but different durations: G1 high viral load for 48 weeks, G1 low viral load with rapid virologic response for 24 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 48 weeks, and G2/3 with rapid virologic response for 12 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Sustained virologic response was similar in both strategies. The cost per successfully treated patient for standard therapy is 17,812 euros and for therapy à la carte 12,313 euros. Assuming that 13,309 patients with standard therapy and 14,450 patients with therapy à la carte achieve sustained virologic response, therapy à la carte has an overall cost-saving of 59.13 million euros.

CONCLUSION

Therapy à la carte is a cost-saving strategy for chronic hepatitis C infection compared to standard therapy, with lower investment requirement per patient to achieve sustained virologic response.

Molecular methods of hepatitis C genotyping

Hepatitis C virus is an RNA virus that is associated with chronic infection in the majority of people infected. Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus is the cause of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide and is associated with a large spectrum of liver disease including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. End-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C virus infection is currently the leading indication for liver transplantation in the USA. Hepatitis C virus genotyping of viral isolates circulating in the blood during chronic infection has become an important part of hepatitis C virus monitoring in chronically infected patients, and is useful as a prognostic indicator and to direct duration of therapy. This review will summarize information on hepatitis C genotyping, describe the limitations of current commercially available methods, give information on more recently developed methods, and provide a look to the future in terms of where advances in hepatitis C virus genotyping assays need to be made.

Epidemic dynamics of two coexisting hepatitis C virus subtypes

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects about 3% of the human population. Phylogenetic analyses have grouped its variants into six major genotypes, which have a star-like distribution and several minor subtypes. The most abundant genotype in Europe is the so-called genotype 1, with two prevalent subtypes, 1a and 1b. In order to explain the higher prevalence of subtype 1b over 1a, a large-scale sequence analysis (100 virus clones) has been carried out over 25 patients of both subtypes in two regions of the HCV genome: one comprising hypervariable region 1 and another including the interferon sensitivity-determining region. Neither polymorphism analysis nor molecular variance analysis (attending to intra- and intersubtype differences, age, sex and previous history of antiviral treatment) was able to show any particular difference between subtypes that might account for their different prevalence. Only the demographic history of the populations carrying both subtypes and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for risk practice suggested that the route of transmission may be the most important factor to explain the observed difference.

Comparative analysis of hepatitis C virus phylogenies from coding and non-coding regions: the 5' untranslated region (UTR) fails to classify subtypes

Background

The duration of treatment for HCV infection is partly indicated by the genotype of the virus. For studies of disease transmission, vaccine design, and surveillance for novel variants, subtype-level classification is also needed. This study used the Shimodaira-Hasegawa test and related statistical techniques to compare phylogenetic trees obtained from coding and non-coding regions of a whole-genome alignment for the reliability of subtyping in different regions.

Results

Different regions of the HCV genome yield inconsistent phylogenies, which can lead to erroneous conclusions about classification of a given infection. In particular, the highly conserved 5' untranslated region (UTR) yields phylogenetic trees with topologies that differ from the HCV polyprotein and complete genome phylogenies. Phylogenetic trees from the NS5B gene reliably cluster related subtypes, and yield topologies consistent with those of the whole genome and polyprotein.

Conclusion

These results extend those from previous studies and indicate that, unlike the NS5B gene, the 5' UTR contains insufficient variation to resolve HCV classifications to the level of viral subtype, and fails to distinguish genotypes reliably. Use of the 5' UTR for clinical tests to characterize HCV infection should be replaced by a subtype-informative test.

Multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay for determination of hepatitis C virus genotypes

A variety of methods have been used to determine hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. Because therapeutic decisions for chronic HCV-related hepatitis are made on the basis of genotype, it is important that genotype be accurately determined by clinical laboratories. Existing methods are often subjective, inaccurate, manual, time-consuming, and contamination prone. We therefore evaluated real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) reagents that have recently become commercially available (Abbott HCV Genotype ASR). The assay developed by our laboratory starts with purified RNA and can be performed in 4 to 5 h. An initial evaluation of 479 samples was done with a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method and the RT-PCR assay, and discrepant samples were sequenced. An additional 1,200 samples were then tested, and data from all assays were used to evaluate the efficiency and specificity of each genotype-specific reaction. Good correlation between results by the two methods was seen. Discrepant samples included those indeterminate by the RT-PCR assay (n = 110) and a subset that were incorrectly called 2a by the RFLP method (n = 75). The real-time RT-PCR assay performed well with genotype 1, 2, and 3 samples. Inadequate numbers of samples were available to evaluate fully genotypes 4, 5, and 6. Analysis of each primer-probe set demonstrated that weak cross-reactive amplifications were common but usually did not interfere with the genotype determination. However, in about 1% of samples, two or more genotypes amplified at roughly equivalent amounts. Further studies are necessary to determine whether these mixed-genotype samples are true mixtures or a reflection of occasional cross-reactive amplifications.

Absence of HCV viral recombination following superinfection

We sought evidence of viral recombination in five recently hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected young injection drug users who became superinfected with a distinguishable strain of HCV. The entire open reading frame of plasma HCV genomes was reverse transcribed, polymerase chain reaction amplified in two fragments, and directly sequenced. In two cases of same subtype (1a > 1a) superinfections the initial and later strains were both sequenced and compared for evidence of recombination. In three cases of superinfection with strains of different genotype/subtype (3a > 1a, 1a > 3a, 1b > 1a), the later time point HCV genomes were sequenced and compared with representative genomes of the initial genotype/subtype. No evidence of intra- or inter-genotype/subtype recombination was detected using six different programs for detecting recombination. We conclude that the generation of viable recombinant HCV genomes able to dominate in the viral quasispecies is a rare event.

HCV virological assessment

Virological assessment of HCV infection relies on a series of assays that are essential for diagnostic purposes and to adopt therapeutic decisions. Diagnostic assays can be classified in three groups: assays that are designed to detect specific antibodies to HCV; techniques that detect and quantify viral load; and tests aimed at determining the infecting HCV type. In general, the use of these assays is similar in HCV infected patients as in those co-infected with HCV and HIV. Co-infected patients, however, have some inherent characteristics (deficient immune status, high HCV-RNA concentrations, particular genotype distribution, low response to antiviral therapy) that make the interpretation of such assays slightly different. Regarding assays to detect antibodies to HCV, last generation tests have a similar sensitivity in mono-infected and co-infected individuals. HCV-RNA testing might be helpful in anti-HCV negative individuals with clinical or analytical suspicion of liver disease. Genotype determination in patients co-infected with HCV and HIV should be performed by methods relying on sequence analysis, since serotyping assays have shown a lower sensitivity in co-infected cohorts. HCV-RNA concentration is a strong predictor of response to therapy. Due to the higher viral load of co-infected patients compared to HCV mono-infected individuals, those assays with a wide dynamic range seem more appropriate to monitor viral load during treatment.

Genotyping of hepatitis C virus by Taqman real-time PCR

BACKGROUND

Genotype of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is of major importance for the outcome of treatment. The response rate is considerably lower for genotype 1, the predominant genotype in western countries.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and evaluate a new, simple method for genotyping of HCV based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Taqman probes targeting the 5' non-coding region.

STUDY DESIGN

The method was compared with Innolipa on 220 serum samples representing genotypes 1-4, and was applied on a further 614 clinical samples.

RESULTS

Taqman typing of the 220 samples showed genotype 1 in 69, genotype 2 in 58, genotype 3 in 57 and genotype 4 in 19, while 17 were non-reactive. There was a complete concordance with Innolipa with the exception of seven samples, which were of genotype 1 by Taqman, but genotype 4 by Innolipa. Sequencing of these samples showed a subtype 4 variant which differed at two positions compared with subtypes 4b/c/d, which are targeted by the probe. By adding a modified probe, these genotype 4 variants could also be identified. Out of 614 consecutive clinical samples, 524 could be typed by the Taqman assay; 45.2% were genotype 1, 19.3% genotype 2, 33.8% genotype 3 and 1.7%, genotype 4.

CONCLUSION

The method was overall accurate and provides an attractive alternative for genotyping because processing time and costs are significantly reduced. Inclusion of probes targeting genotypes 5 and 6 is required for the method to be useful in areas where these genotypes are present.

Population Genotyping of Hepatitis C Virus by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Short DNA Fragments

Background: Identifying hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes has become increasingly important for determining clinical course and the outcome of antiviral therapy. Here we describe the development of restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) analysis, a novel matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) assay suitable for high-throughput, sensitive, specific genotyping of multiple HCV species.

Methods: The assay is based on PCR amplification and mass measurement of oligonucleotides containing genotype-specific motifs in the 5′ untranslated region, into which a type IIS restriction endonuclease recognition was introduced by PCR amplification. Enzymatic cleavage of the products led to excision of multiple oligonucleotide fragments representing variable regions whose masses were determined by MALDI-TOF MS.

Results: The RFMP assay identified viral genotypes present at concentrations as low as 0.5% and reliably determined their relative abundance. When sera from 318 patients were analyzed, the RFMP assay exhibited 100% concordance with results obtained by clonal sequencing and identified mixed-genotype infections in 22% of the samples, in addition to several subtype variants.

Conclusions: The RFMP assay has practical advantages over existing methods, including better quantitative detection of mixed populations and detection of genotype variants without need for population-based cloning, enabling reliable viral genotyping in laboratories and efficient study of the relationship between viral genotypes and clinical outcome.

Effect of oligonucleotide primers in determining viral variability within hosts

BACKGROUND

Genetic variability in viral populations is usually estimated by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based methods in which the relative abundance of each amplicon is assumed to be proportional to the frequency of the corresponding template in the initial sample. Although bias in template-to-product ratios has been described before, its relevance in describing viral genetic variability at the intrapatient level has not been fully assessed yet.

RESULTS

To investigate the role of oligonucleotide design in estimating viral variability within hosts, genetic diversity in hepatitis C virus (HCV) populations from eight infected patients was characterised by two parallel PCR amplifications performed with two slightly different sets of primers, followed by cloning and sequencing (mean = 89 cloned sequences per patient). Population genetics analyses of viral populations recovered by pairs of amplifications revealed that in seven patients statistically significant differences were detected between populations sampled with different set of primers.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic variability analyses demonstrates that PCR selection due to the choice of primers, differing in their degeneracy degree at some nucleotide positions, can eclipse totally or partially viral variants, hence yielding significant different estimates of viral variability within a single patient and therefore eventually producing quite different qualitative and quantitative descriptions of viral populations within each host.

Evaluation of a prototype HCV NS5b assay for typing strains of hepatitis C virus isolated from Tunisian haemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) strains isolated from 68 haemodialysis Tunisian patients exhibiting chronic infection were genotyped targeting the NS5b region of the HCV genome using a prototype assay developed by Bayer HealthCare-Diagnostics (TRUGENE NS5b HCV). The overall results were compared to those obtained with another assay of the same company based on sequencing of the 5' non-coding region (TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit). All strains could be typed by the 5'NC typing kit, but only 62 (91; 2%) by the NS5b prototype assay. All the 62 strains typed by both methods exhibited the same pattern at the type level: 57 were type 1, 3 were type 2, and 2 were type 4. At the subtype level, eight strains that gave undetermined results by the 5'NC kit were successfully typed by the NS5b kit; eight additional strains exhibited discrepant results. The overall agreement between the two assays was 74.2% at the subtype level. In conclusion, the NS5b region appears to be much more accurate than the 5'NC region to subtype HCV strains, especially in those isolated from patients attending haemodialysis centres where the subtype distribution suggests frequent nosocomial transmissions.

Determining hepatitis C genotype by analyzing the sequence of the NS5b region

Assays to determine the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype have recently become useful for clinical decision making and may be suitable for epidemiological investigations, such as identifying HCV outbreaks in a given population. Molecular assays are the most common diagnostic tools for HCV genotyping. This study compares two genome typing assays, one, the Trugene 5'NC genotyping kit, uses the sequence of the 5' non-coding (5'NC) region and the other, a non-commercial assay, uses the non-structural 5b (NS5b) region. Serum samples from 203 chronically HCV-infected patients were tested. The 5'NC and the NS5b assays were both very effective in identifying the genotype (99 and 98.5%) and the results with the two methods were always concordant for the genotype. The NS5b analysis permitted the identification of the subtype in all samples, whereas the 5'NC region assay did not in 33% of samples. The NS5b analysis showed that one patient had a mixed infection with HCV subtypes 1a and 2c, while the 5'NC assay did not. It is concluded that phylogenetic analysis using both the 5'NC and the NS5b regions are reliable and convenient methods for HCV typing in clinical practice. But analysis of the NS5b region may be more useful for tracing the source of an HCV infection.

Evidence for lack of cross-genotype protection of CD4+ T cell responses during chronic hepatitis C virus infection

CD4+ T lymphocyte responses are thought to play a major role in control of the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Few, however, have been mapped down to the level of peptide and HLA restriction. Furthermore, the ability of such T cells to respond to viruses which differ in genotype has not been addressed in detail. In most cases of persistent infection with HCV, CD4 proliferative responses are weak or absent. From a large cohort of persistently infected patients, we identified an individual with unusually robust and persistent responses in the face of chronic infection. We firstly mapped two peptide epitopes to regions of the nonstructural protein NS4 (aa1686-1705 and aa 1746-1765). However, in contrast to the genotype 1a derived antigens used for mapping, the infecting virus was identified as genotype 3a. Strikingly, the patient's CD4 response to these epitopes were specific only for the genotype 1a sequence, and did not recognize genotype 3a synthetic peptides. Serologic assays indicated that prior exposure to HCV of genotype 1 had occurred. This patient therefore maintains strong CD4 proliferative responses which are genotype specific and not cross-reactive. The apparent 'misdirection' of these nonprotective responses has important implications for the role of natural and vaccine induced CD4 responses in the face of variable viruses.

Performance of TRUGENE hepatitis C virus 5' noncoding genotyping kit, a new CLIP sequencing-based assay for hepatitis C virus genotype determination

The performance of the recently developed, standardized direct sequencing assay for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping [TRUGENE HCV 5'-NC (noncoding)] was assessed in comparison with the reverse hybridization-based assay INNO-LIPA HCV II. Both assays allow HCV genotyping starting from amplification products generated by the diagnostic Roche AMPLICOR HCV test. HCV amplicons from 205 patients were used for this study: 34 were tested prospectively by both methods, while 171 had been stored at -20 degrees C for up to 2 years after LiPA genotyping. The TRUGENE procedure failed to determine a genotype in six low-titered samples (3.5 +/- 0.3 log UI/mL vs. 5.2 +/- 0.5 UI/mL for typable samples). Type and subtype could be determined by sequencing for 199 samples (97%). Among them, five were considered as coinfections by the LiPA method. Three LiPA patterns suggesting type 1 and 4 coinfection were not supported by sequence analysis while one 1a/2b and one 1a/3a coinfection was backed up by direct sequencing. For the remaining 194 samples, type assignment was concordant in 100% of the cases. LiPA subtyping was available for 162 samples (83.5%). Sub-typing results concurred in 128 cases (79%). NS5B sequencing of discrepant samples underscored the limitation of the 5'-noncoding region (NCR) in correct subtype assignment. In conclusion, the TRUGENE HCV 5'-NC genotyping kit appeared to be a specific and reliable method that can be used in the current indication of HCV genotyping.

Distribution of HCV genotypes among risk groups in Serbia

Blood samples from 190 patients that were anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive were genotyped and 165 were found to contain HCV-RNA. Genotyping was performed by PCR based on type-specific primers (117 isolates) and LiPA test (48 isolates) and verifying by sequencing. In Serbia, the most frequent genotype was 1b (49.1%), followed by genotype 3 (21.2%) and genotype 1a (8.5%). The frequency of genotypes 2 and 4 was below 5% and mixed infections were encountered in 9.1% of cases. Distribution of genotypes was monitored in different risk groups: intravenous drug abusers, patients under blood transfusion, patients with previous history of surgery, patients undergoing hemodialysis and those with unknown risk factors. Genotype distribution is essentially the same in all the groups, except for the patients undergoing hemodialysis and those with previous history of surgery where significant difference exists compared with the group with unknown route of transmission (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). There exists significant age-dependent genotype 3 distribution in Serbian population (p < 0.01).

Changes in hepatitis C virus population in serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in chronically infected patients receiving liver graft from infected donors

BACKGROUND

We have previously studied hepatitis C (HCV)-infected recipients of livers from HCV-infected donors and found that either the donor's strain or the recipient's strain predominate in serum. The current study was undertaken to determine whether these changes are complete and whether they are reflected in the population of virus associated with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

METHODS

We analyzed HCV ribonucleic acid from sequential serum and PBMC samples from 11 and 8 patients, respectively. The relatively stable NS5 region was chosen for analysis because it allowed for dependable identification of donor and recipient strains. Viral sequences were analyzed by direct sequencing and by sensitive strain-specific polymerase chain reaction assays. These assays were capable of detecting the minor sequence present at a concentration 1:104-10-7 below that of the major sequence.

RESULTS

Five patients retained their original infecting strain; the donor strain was detected only transiently. In the remaining six patients, recipient strain was detected for the first few weeks, after which only the donor strain was consistently present. However, in one patient the second nondominant strain was detected from the background of the major strain on a single occasion 8 months after transplantation. All changes in serum were closely paralleled by those occurring in PBMCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Viral population changes in the setting of liver transplantation from HCV-infected donors to HCV-infected recipients occur simultaneously in PBMCs and serum. The takeover of one strain by another in PBMC- and serum-derived viral populations seemed to be complete and long lasting.

Exposure of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-positive recipients to HCV RNA-positive blood donors results in rapid predominance of a single donor strain and exclusion and/or suppression of the recipient strain

We have analyzed three cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients who received blood from HCV-infected donors. Two recipients were exposed to two different HCV RNA-positive donors, and one was exposed to a single donor. All parental genomes from the actual infecting units of blood and the recipients were defined, and their presence in the follow-up serum samples was determined using sensitive strain-specific assays. The strain from one of the donors was found to predominate in all recipients' serum samples collected throughout the follow-up period of 10 to 30 months. In two recipients exposed to two infected donors, the strain from the second donor was occasionally found at very low level. However, the original recipients' strains were not detected. Our observations show that HCV-infected individuals can be superinfected with different strains, and this event may lead to eradication or suppression of the original infecting strain. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that simultaneous exposure to multiple HCV strains may result in concomitant infection by more than one strain, although a single strain could rapidly establish its dominance. The results of the present study suggest the existence of competition among infecting HCV strains which determines the ultimate outcome of multiple HCV exposure.

Genotyping of hepatitis C virus isolates using CLIP sequencing

Determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and subtypes has become increasingly important for the clinical management and prognosis of HCV infections. The aim of the present study was to assess the specificity and reliability of a newly developed, commercially available HCV genotyping kit (TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit). This technique utilizes PCR fragments previously generated by the diagnostic Roche AMPLICOR HCV test, which are subsequently subjected to simultaneous PCR amplification and direct sequencing (CLIP sequencing) of the 5' noncoding region (5'NCR). HCV isolates from 100 randomly chosen patients were genotyped by both the TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit and DNA enzyme immunoassay (DEIA). Typing results obtained by both methods were in complete concordance in 91% of the cases. HCV RNA from the samples with discordant genotype assignment in both assays was additionally amplified with primers from the HCV core and NS5B regions. Phylogenetic analysis of the obtained sequences supported the results obtained from DEIA in six cases and CLIP sequencing in two cases. In the former six cases, the TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit could not correctly differentiate between subtypes of genotypes 1 and 2 due to the high conservation of the 5'NCR. However, since there was not any misclassification between HCV genotypes 1 and non-1 types, the results obtained with this system are, in general, reliable and can be used in clinical practice. The TRUGENE HCV 5'NC genotyping kit in our hands proved to be a fast and convenient technique that might be an attractive option for HCV genotyping in laboratories already using the Roche AMPLICOR HCV test for diagnostic reverse transcription-PCR.

Comparison and application of a novel genotyping method, semiautomated primer-specific and mispair extension analysis, and four other genotyping assays for detection of hepatitis C virus mixed-genotype infections

To date the true prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) mixed-genotype infections has not been established mainly because currently available methods are not suitable for the detection of mixed genotypes in a viral population. A novel semiautomated genotyping method, primer-specific and mispair extension analysis (S-PSMEA), which is more reliable than other genotyping assays was developed for detection of HCV mixed-genotype infections. A genotype present at levels as low as 0.8% in a defined mix of HCV genotypes was detected, showing a 20-fold increase in sensitivity over that of direct DNA sequencing. A total of 434 HCV isolates were genotyped and analyzed for a comparative study of the accuracy between S-PSMEA and four current genotyping methods. The results showed that viruses in approximately 40% of the samples from this group determined to be infected with mixed genotypes by S-PSMEA were undetected by direct DNA sequencing due to its low sensitivity. Type-specific PCR, line probe assay, and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis performed poorly, being able to identify only 38.5, 16.1, and 15.4% of mixed-genotype infections, respectively, that were detected by direct DNA sequencing. The prevalence of mixed-genotype infections detected by S-PSMEA was 7.9% (12 of 152 donors) among HCV-infected blood donors, 14.3% (15 of 105) among patients with chronic hepatitis C, and 17.1% (6 of 36) among thalassemia patients who had received multiple transfusions. The data lead us to conclude that HCV mixed-genotype infections are more common than previously estimated and that S-PSMEA may be the method of choice when detection of genotypes present at low levels in mixed-genotype infections is required due to its higher level of sensitivity.

Viral heterogeneity of the hepatitis C virus

This review summarises the classification of hepatitis C virus as a flavivirus, the identification and detection of HCV genotypes, and reviews the current information concerning the geographical and risk group associations of the common genotypes in Europe.

Relationship of hepatitis C viremia to HIV state and to infection by specific hepatitis C genotypes

AIMS/BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to examine the relationship of hepatitis C (HCV) viremia to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and to investigate the evidence of infection by specific hepatitis C genotypes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The analysis of HCV viremia was performed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in serum samples from 186 patients' selected by their positivity for anti-HCV antibodies. All samples were tested for HIV infection. In those patients with sera positivity for HCV RNA, isolates were genotyped by line probe assay. In those patients whose sera were negative for HCV RNA, antibodies specific for genotypes implicated in past HCV infection were detected by ELISA.

RESULTS

HCV RNA was detected in 117 patients with anti-HCV antibodies (62.9%). There was no statistically significant association between HCV RNA and HIV positivity (Odds ratio, O.R.: 1.75, Confidence interval 95%, C.I.: 0.92-3.33, p = 0.095). A positive association was demonstrated between infection by HCV genotype 3 and HCV viremia (O.R.: 10.67, C.I.: 1.51-458.05, p = 0.015) in HIV-infected patients, as well as between infection by HCV genotype 1 and HCV viremia (O.R.: 4.71, C.I.: 1.65-13.75, p = 0.002) in HIV-non infected individuals. In both groups, a negative association was observed between past HCV infection by multiple genotypes and HCV viremia (HIV-infected patients, O.R.: 0.10, C.I.: 0.00-1.11, p = 0.033. HIV-non infected patients, O.R.: 0.05, C.I.: 0.00-0.41, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection by specific HCV genotypes (type 3 in HIV-infected patients and by type 1 in HIV-non infected ones) implies a higher risk of HCV viremia, whereas multiple HCV types infection is negatively associated with this probability. HIV coinfection does not influence the probability of HCV viremia.

Comparative study of a modified competitive RT-PCR and Amplicor HCV monitor assays for quantitation of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum

A modified competitive RT-PCR (mcRT-PCR) to measure HCV RNA in serum and the Amplicor HCV Monitor assay were compared. For mcRT-PCR, the RNA extracted was retrotranscribed and coamplified in one step with a known amount of a DNA internal control (IC). Digoxigenin-labeled amplified products were hybridized to specific HCV DNA and IC-DNA probes and quantified by colorimetry. HCV RNA concentration was calculated by plotting the ratio of HCV/IC ODs against a calibration curve. Multiple samples were analyzed in the same round and tedious titration of each sample with a competitor was unnecessary. The mcRT-PCR assay was linear from 6 x 10(3) to 6 x 10(7) copies/ml, whereas Amplicor was linear up to 1-2 x 10(6) copies/ml. HCV RNA was measured in samples from 75 carriers. There was agreement between both methods in type 1 infections but not in type 2 or type 3 infections, in which the values measured by Amplicor were, on average, 15 times lower than those measured by the mcRT-PCR. HCV RNA measured by Amplicor was higher in type 1 infections than in type 2 or 3 infections, but no differences were found when viral load was assessed by mcRT-PCR. The binding efficiency of the Amplicor-probe was greater for type 1 than for types 2 or 3, suggesting Amplicor underestimates the viral load in the latter types. In contrast, the mcRT-PCR is not affected by genotype-related variation of HCV. This study suggests that mcRT-PCR assay is reliable for sensitive and accurate measurement of HCV RNA over a broad range of values independently of the HCV genotype.

Relationship of the genomic complexity of hepatitis C virus with liver disease severity and response to interferon in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection [correction of interferon]

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, the influence of the genetic heterogeneity of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) on the progression of liver disease and on the responsiveness to interferon therapy is a matter of controversy. In this study we evaluated the genetic complexity of HCV by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of amplicons from the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) in 168 patients with chronic genotype 1b HCV infection, of whom 122 received a single course of interferon therapy (3 MU, three times weekly for 6 months). No correlation was observed between the degree of genetic complexity of HCV (indicated by the number of bands in the SSCP assay) and patient age, serum alanine aminotransferase activity, or serum HCV-RNA concentration, measured by competitive polymerase chain reaction. HCV genomic complexity was not related to gender nor to the presumed source of infection. The number of SSCP bands detected in serum samples from patients with chronic hepatitis, either mild (8.1 +/- 3.9), moderate (8.0 +/- 3.3), or severe (9.2 +/- 3.3), and in patients with liver cirrhosis, either compensated (8.0 +/- 2.9), decompensated (6.3 +/- 2.9), or with superimposed hepatocellular carcinoma (9.5 +/- 2.9), was similar. The number of SSCP bands detected in patients with sustained response (7.5 +/- 3. 9), transient response (8.3 +/- 2.9), or no response (8.2 +/- 3.6) to interferon administration was similar as well. These observations suggest that the genetic complexity of hypervariable region (HVR1) of HCV, as estimated by SSCP analysis, is not related to the severity of liver injury nor to the type of response to interferon therapy. Thus, information offered by SSCP analysis of HVR1 of HCV in chronic HCV genotype 1b infection does not appear to be useful in the clinical management of these patients. (HEPATOLOGY 1999;29:897-903.)

Genotyping HCV isolates from Italy by type-specific PCR assay in the core region

A revision of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) core procedure was performed for genotyping hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 139 patients from Italy. This procedure, developed prior to the identification of new genotypes, may be inadequate in several geographical areas. We proposed a new typing mixture in which primers for types 2c and 4, that are reported to be circulating in Italy, were added and a primer for type 2b was substituted. Using the modified procedure, 139 HCV-positive patients were analysed. The HCV genotype was identified in 96.4% of the cases. We observed double infections and unclassified genotypes in 5 (3.6%) and 5 (3.6%) patients, respectively. The classification of isolates into genotypes and subtypes 2b, 2c and 4 was confirmed by sequence analysis. Furthermore, the efficiency and accuracy of the modified core procedure were evaluated by parallel testing of 107 out of 139 samples using the line probe assay, and demonstrated a 98.9% degree of concordance. The results demonstrated the specificity of the selected primers for type 2c, 2b and 4 and confirmed the circulation of types 2c and 4 in Italy. In conclusion, the proposed modified PCR procedure is the only primer-specific PCR genotyping method available for identification of the 2c and 4 genotypes reported to be circulated in Italy and other European countries.

Hepatitis G virus infection in chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

The hepatitis G virus (HGV), a recently identified member of the Flaviviridae family, can cause chronic infection in man but the role of this agent in chronic liver disease is poorly understood.

AIMS

To evaluate the prevalence and meaning of HGV infection in a large series of patients with chronic liver disease.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred volunteer blood donors, 179 patients with chronic hepatitis C, 111 with chronic hepatitis B, 104 with alcoholic liver disease, 136 with hepatocellular carcinoma, and 24 with cryptogenic chronic liver disease were studied.

METHODS

HGV RNA was investigated in serum samples by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction amplification of the 5' non-coding region of HCV and hybridisation to a specific probe. The main features of HGV RNA seropositive and seronegative patients were compared.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HGV infection was 3% in blood donors, 7% in chronic hepatitis C, 8% in chronic hepatitis B, 2% in alcoholic liver disease, 4% in hepatocellular carcinoma, and 8% in cryptogenic chronic liver disease. HGV infected patients tended to be younger than non-infected patients but no differences concerning sex, possible source of infection, clinical manifestations, biochemical and virological parameters, or severity of liver lesions were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HGV infection in chronic liver disease seems to be relatively low in our area. Infection with HGV does not seem to play a significant pathogenic role in patients with chronic liver disease related to chronic HBV or HCV infection or to increased alcohol consumption, or in those with cryptogenic chronic liver disease.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in Spanish patients with HCV infection: relationship between HCV genotype 1b, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The influence of the infecting virus genotype on the progression of the underlying liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of HCV genotypes in Spanish patients with chronic HCV infection and to elucidate the relationship between the infecting genotype and the severity of the disease.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of frequency distribution of HCV genotypes was carried out in 414 Spanish patients with chronic HCV infection, including 243 patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic chronic hepatitis, 112 patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and 59 patients with decompensated cirrhosis. HCV genotype was determined by restriction fragment length polymorphisms of the 5' non-coding region.

RESULTS

Infection with HCV genotype 1b was found in 72% of patients with chronic hepatitis and in more than 90% of patients with cirrhosis, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma. Older age, infection with genotype 1b and absence of overt parenteral exposure as a possible source of infection were associated with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma by univariate analysis and this association was confirmed by regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV genotype 1b is associated with advanced liver disease in our geographical area. However, this may be related to a cohort-effect caused by over-representation of genotype 1b in older patients with more advanced disease, because, in our country, this HCV genotype appeared earlier in time and is therefore associated with more prolonged periods of infection.

Serotyping and genotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV) strains in chronic HCV infection. Commission Hepatologie du CREGG. Club de Reflexion des Cabinets de Groupes en GastroEnterologie

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes can be established by methods based on PCR typing and serological typing. The accuracy of these methods depends on their sensitivity and specificity. These should be compared with the reference method, direct sequencing, and analysis of viral genomes. Among the serologic methods recently developed, the performance of a new serotyping assay (RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, Chiron corporation, Emeryville) was assessed using a panel of 147 well-characterized French isolates from chronic hepatitis C patients. Definitive genotypes of the isolates were established by direct sequencing in 5' NC and in some cases in NS-5B. HCV serotypes 1, 2, and 3 were determined by measuring type specific antibodies to core and NS-4 derived peptide antigens. Of the 147 sera, serotypic-specific antibodies were detected in 136 (sensitivity, 92.5%). The specificity of the RIBA SIA HCV serotyping assay was 92.6% (including samples with mixed results); without these, the specificity was 80.1%. Analysis of the 28 discrepant samples showed that (1) a different serotype was found in 18 samples including five for genotype 1, three for genotype 2, two for genotype 3, five for genotype 4, and three for genotype 5, and that (2) ten patients showed a reactivity with mixed serotypes, one had circulating antibodies to type 1 or 2, and nine had circulating antibodies to type 1 or 3. In summary, except for genotypes 4 and 5, the results of the test were well correlated (85.7%) with those of direct sequence genotyping. The former test is rapid and does not require the strict HCV RNA storage and preservation conditions of the latter. This new method may thus be considered as an alternative for HCV typing. However, although it is convenient, its lower sensitivity compared to the molecular typing method and the discrepant results limit its routine use in a clinical context.

Evaluation and comparison of different hepatitis C virus genotyping and serotyping assays

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Evidence that the geno/subtype of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is predictive of the response to interferon-alpha therapy suggests that typing methods are clinically useful. In the present study, HCV isolates obtained from 74 patients with chronic hepatitis C were used to evaluate three genotyping and two serotyping assays.

METHODS

The reverse hybridization assay and the DNA immunoassay are based on immobilized type-specific probes for the 5'-noncoding and the core region, respectively. A third genotyping assay utilized type-specific primers for amplification of the core region. Serotyping assays detect type-specific antibodies of the nonstructural-4 region (enzyme immunoassay) or of the core and nonstructural-4 region (recombinant immunoblot assay). Gold standard geno/subtyping of HCV isolates was performed by sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the nonstructural-5B region.

RESULTS

All genotyping systems amplified the respective target region of the HCV genome with high sensitivity. The reverse hybridization assay and the DNA immunoassay correctly identified HCV-1, -2, and -3. The DNA immunoassay misinterpreted all HCV-4 isolates as HCV-4 and -5 coinfection. In the type-specific amplification assay, coinfections of subtypes HCV-1a and HCV-3a with HCV-1b could not be excluded. The reverse hybridization assay misinterpreted 1/14 HCV-1a isolates as HCV-1h, and vice versa 3/36 HCV-1b isolates as HCV-1a. Furthermore, differentiation between HCV-2a and -2c was not possible using this assay. The DNA immunoassay correctly identified all HCV subtypes. The serotyping assays, recombinant immunoblot assay and enzyme immunoassay identified HCV-1, -2, and -3 in 93% and 89% of cases, respectively. HCV-4, however, could only be recognized by the enzyme immunoassay.

CONCLUSIONS

The reverse hybridization assay and the DNA immunoassay specifically identified HCV genotypes 1, 2, and 3, while crossreactivity occurred in the primer-specific amplification assay. The DNA immunoassay achieved the best performance in HCV subtyping. Both serotyping systems correctly identified HCV-1, -2, and -3 in about 90% of cases, but lack the possibility of subtyping.

Hepatitis G virus infection in chronic hepatitis C: frequency, features and response to interferon therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The pathogenic relevance of the hepatitis G virus (HGV) and its sensitivity to interferon are currently under investigation. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of HGV infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C and to elucidate if HGV co-infection modifies the clinical course and the response to interferon therapy in this disease.

METHODS

HGV-RNA was investigated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in serum from 143 consecutive patients who received interferon alpha-2b (3 MU t.i.w.) for 24 weeks. Baseline features and response to therapy in HGV-infected and non-infected patients were compared. To assess the antiviral effect of interferon, serial quantitative measurement of HCV-RNA and HGV-RNA in serum was performed in patients co-infected with HCV and HGV.

RESULTS

Eight patients (5.6%) presented HGV-RNA sequences in serum. No significant differences were found between HGV-infected and non-infected patients in relation to age, sex, source of infection, liver function tests, liver histology and HCV genotype, nor in the biochemical response to interferon, which was sustained in 12% and 15%, transient in 37% and 30% and absent in 50% and 55% of HGV-infected and non-infected patients, respectively. HGV-RNA became negative in all treated patients, but sustained viral inhibition was observed only in those with low viral load.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HGV infection in HCV-infected patients is relatively low in our geographical area. HGV co-infection does not appear to modify the clinical presentation nor the response to interferon in chronic hepatitis C. HGV is sensitive to interferon, particularly if pre-treatment viral load is low.