Salivary immunoglobulin G assay to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in children

Detection of serum and salivary IgE and IgG1 immunoglobulins specific for diagnosis of food allergy

Given the growing incidence and prevalence of life-threatening food allergies, health concerns have raised new perspectives for in vivo and in vitro diagnostic methodologies, pointing to saliva as a promising material, already used to diagnose other pathologies. Based on the above considerations, this study aimed to verify the possible use of saliva for the detection of IgE and IgG₁ in the diagnosis of food allergy. This was a randomized, cross-sectional clinical study with a quantitative approach, developed at a hospital referral center in allergy in the state of Ceará, from January to July 2015. The sample consisted of 36 children of both sexes, aged between 1 and 60 months, with a diagnosis of cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) by the RAST test. Children hospitalized or under immunosuppressive drugs were excluded from the study. Serum and saliva samples of the participants were collected and subsequently subjected to the indirect immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) for the detection of specific serum and salivary immunoglobulins for food: corn, papaya, cow's milk, egg white, wheat, soybeans, peanuts, nuts, kiwi, cacao, fish, shrimp, bananas and tomatoes. For comparison of serum and saliva results, the T-test of independent samples and Mann-Whitney were adopted, for samples with normal and non-normal distribution respectively. A confidence interval of 95% was adopted for significant results. It was observed that 100% (n = 36) of the participants presented cow's milk allergy through the indirect ELISA, detecting IgE or IgG₁ in serum and saliva. When serum IgE and IgG₁ concentrations were compared, there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) in 12 of the 14 foods evaluated. The same amount (n = 12) of non-significant differences (p > 0.05) was observed in the comparison of the 14 foods under IgE and IgG₁ contractions in saliva. In the verification of the average values of IgE present in the serum and saliva of the foods, only cow's milk, fish and papaya showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Of the total food evaluated, only the average levels of IgG₁ present in serum and saliva showed a significant value (p < 0.05) in banana and tomato. These findings indicate that the detection of IgE and IgG₁ in saliva proves to be as efficient as in the serum. The use of the salivary technique for use in the diagnosis of food allergy is suggested.

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

Use of IgG in oral fluid to monitor infants with suspected congenital toxoplasmosis

Infants born to mothers who seroconverted for toxoplasmosis during pregnancy are at risk of sequelae. In the case of a negative work-up at birth, congenital infection can be ruled out only by monitoring the disappearance of maternal immunoglobulin G (IgG) transmitted through the placenta, which can be achieved by regular blood sampling during the first year. To alleviate the discomfort of this follow-up, we developed an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect specific IgG diffusing passively from the blood through the gingival epithelium by collecting oral fluid on microsponges. To assess the feasibility of the test, 212 patients were first enrolled. Levels of specific IgG in oral fluid were significantly higher in seropositive (n = 195) than in seronegative (n = 17) patients (mean optical densities, 1.145 ± 0.99 versus 0.092 ± 0.127; P < 0.0001). In a population of 93 patients <15 months of age born to mothers who displayed toxoplasmic infection during pregnancy, 70 were free of congenital infection and were followed up until their serology turned negative, and 23 were congenitally infected. The same patterns of IgG were observed in the oral fluid and sera in each group. Using a cutoff of 0.04 (optical density value), the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 67.9% and 80.3%, respectively, and the probability of not having a congenital infection when the test on oral fluid was negative was 99%. Although the performance of the test needs to be improved, oral fluid sampling appears to be a promising tool for monitoring infants with suspected congenital toxoplasmosis.

New Diagnostic Strategies for Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) is a common chronic bacterial infection that is an important cause of peptic ulcer disease and gastroduodenal disease in children. H pylori is also associated with extragastric manifestations, including growth reduction, iron-deficiency anemia, and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Current guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsy for the definitive demonstration of H pylori infection. In contrast to serology, the fecal antigen test and the urea breath test provide reliable, sensitive, and specific results for detecting active H pylori infection in children before and after treatment. The first-line treatment option for pediatric patients is triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor and 2 antibiotics, which include amoxicillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole. Decreasing eradication rates and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of H pylori have led to the use of other treatments, such as sequential therapy or triple therapy with newer antibiotics, particularly in geographic areas with high rates of antibiotic resistance. Patients should be tested after treatment to confirm eradication, as the absence of symptoms does not necessarily mean that H pylori is no longer present. This clinical roundtable monograph provides an overview of H pylori infection, as well as expert insight into the diagnosis and management of H pylori infection in children.

Saliva-based biosensors: noninvasive monitoring tool for clinical diagnostics

Saliva is increasingly recognised as an attractive diagnostic fluid. The presence of various disease signalling salivary biomarkers that accurately reflect normal and disease states in humans and the sampling benefits compared to blood sampling are some of the reasons for this recognition. This explains the burgeoning research field in assay developments and technological advancements for the detection of various salivary biomarkers to improve clinical diagnosis, management, and treatment. This paper reviews the significance of salivary biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic applications, with focus on the technologies and biosensing platforms that have been reported for screening these biomarkers.

Human saliva as a source of anti-malarial antibodies to examine population exposure to Plasmodium falciparum

Background

Antibody responses to malaria antigens reflect exposure to parasites, and seroprevalence correlates with malaria transmission intensity. Antibodies are routinely measured in sera or on dried blood spots but a non-invasive method would provide extra utility in sampling general populations. Saliva is already in use in the detection of plasma-derived IgM and IgG to viral infections. In this study, antibodies to Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens were compared between blood and saliva samples from the same individuals in unlinked surveys conducted in Tanzania and The Gambia.

Methods

In Tanzania, 53 individuals provided paired fingerprick blood and saliva sample using two commercially available sampling devices. In the Gambia, archived plasma and saliva samples collected from 200 children in the Farafenni area in a cross-sectional survey were analyzed.

IgG antibodies against P. falciparum antigens, Merozoite Surface Protein-1 (MSP-1₁₉) and Apical membrane Antigen (AMA-1) were measured by ELISA in paired saliva and blood samples from both sites. Antibody levels were compared as continuous optical density (OD) values and by sero-positivity.

Results

Significant correlations between saliva and plasma antibody levels were seen in Tanzania for both antigens, AMA-1(r² range 0.93 to 0.89, p < 0.001) and MSP-1₁₉ (r² range 0.93 to 0.75, p < 0.001), with a weaker correlation for results from The Gambia (r²range 0.64 to 0.63, p < 0.01). When assessed as seropositivity and compared with plasma, sensitivity and specificity were good with saliva antibody levels to both AMA-1 and MSP-1₁₉ (sensitivity range 64-77% and specificity range 91-100% & 47-67% and 90-97% respectively) over the different sample sets.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate anti-malarial antibodies can be detected in saliva and correlate strongly with levels in plasma. This non-invasive relatively simple collection method will be potentially useful for general population surveys, and particularly in migratory populations or those with infrequent contact with health services or opposed to blood withdrawal. Further studies will be needed to optimize collection methods, standardize volumes and content and develop controls.

14C-urea breath test is safe for pediatric patients

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, quite prevalent in the developing countries, is considered to be one of the causative factors for various gastric pathologies and other nongastric diseases. It is believed that H. pylori infection is almost always acquired in early childhood and persists throughout life unless specific treatment is given. The (13/14)C-urea breath test (UBT) is now considered to be a 'gold standard' technique for the detection of H. pylori infection. However, because of the lack of facilities and high cost, the preferred nonradioactive ¹³C-UBT cannot be performed on pediatric patients in developing countries, whereas the radioactive ¹⁴C-UBT is not used on children because of the fear of radiation exposure. When using 37 kBq (1 μCi) of ¹⁴C-urea for the ¹⁴C-UBT, the patient is not exposed to more radiation than is acquired from the natural environment in one day, as almost all the ingested radioactivity is excreted from the body (urine and breath) within 72-120 h. This article reviews the importance of the ¹⁴C-UBT for the detection of H. pylori and justifies the radiation safety aspects of its use in children without any fear of 'radiation phobia' where the facility for ¹³C-UBT is lacking.

Development of a multiplex microsphere immunoassay for the quantitation of salivary antibody responses to selected waterborne pathogens

Saliva has an important advantage over serum as a medium for antibody detection due to non-invasive sampling, which is critical for community-based epidemiological surveys. The development of a Luminex multiplex immunoassay for measurement of salivary IgG and IgA responses to potentially waterborne pathogens, Helicobacter pylori, Toxoplasma gondii, Cryptosporidium, and four noroviruses, involved selection of antigens and optimization of antigen coupling to Luminex microspheres. Coupling confirmation was conducted using antigen specific antibody or control sera at serial dilutions. Dose-response curves corresponding to different coupling conditions were compared using statistical tests. Control proteins in the specific antibody assay and a separate duplex assay for total immunoglobulins G and A were employed to assess antibody cross-reactivity and variability in saliva composition. 200 saliva samples prospectively collected from 20 adult volunteers and 10 paired sera from a subset of these volunteers were used to test this method. For chronic infections, H. pylori and T. gondii, individuals who tested IgG seropositive using commercial diagnostic ELISA also had the strongest salivary antibody responses in salivary antibody tests. A steep increase in anti-norovirus salivary antibody response (immunoconversion) was observed after an episode of acute diarrhea and vomiting in a volunteer. The Luminex assay also detected seroconversions to Cryptosporidium using control sera from infected children. Ongoing efforts involve further verification of salivary antibody tests and their application in larger pilot community studies.

Helicobacter pylori detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The discovery of Helicobacter pylori in 1982 was the starting point of a revolution concerning the concepts and management of gastroduodenal diseases. It is now well accepted that the most common stomach disease, peptic ulcer disease, is an infectious disease, and all consensus conferences agree that the causative agent, H. pylori, must be treated with antibiotics. Furthermore, the concept emerged that this bacterium could be the trigger of various malignant diseases of the stomach, and it is now a model for chronic bacterial infections causing cancer. Most of the many different techniques involved in diagnosis of H. pylori infection are performed in clinical microbiology laboratories. The aim of this article is to review the current status of these methods and their application, highlighting the important progress which has been made in the past decade. Both invasive and noninvasive techniques will be reviewed.

Detection and evaluation of salivary antibodies to Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients

Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most prevalent infections in humans. The high prevalence and the association with peptic ulceration and gastric cancer require simple and non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of the infection. Detection of salivary anti-H. pylori IgG antibodies has advantages compared with those on serum. In this study, salivary immunoglobulin G response to H. pylori was evaluated in 100 consecutive dyspeptic patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), in comparison with culture and histopathologic examination of gastric biopsy specimens obtained at endoscopic procedures and assessed the accuracy of salivary diagnosis of the infection. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the test were 87 and 73%, respectively. These results suggest that saliva testing for H. pylori antibodies could be used reliably for screening dyspeptic patients in general practice, especially in children in whom venesection is more difficult.

In vivo expression of the 25-kDa laminin-binding protein ofHelicobacter pylori

The gastroduodenal pathogen Helicobacter pylori has been shown to inhibit the interaction between the extracellular matrix protein laminin and its receptor on gastric epithelial cells, potentially contributing to a loss of mucosal integrity. As a 25-kDa outer membrane protein of H. pylori in association with the bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) mediates attachment to laminin, the aim of this study was to determine whether the 25-kDa protein is produced by H. pylori in infected hosts. We examined the immune response to the 25-kDa laminin binding protein in 12 paediatric patients; samples from a H. pylori-negative healthy adult were used as controls. In immunoblotting, antibodies to a 25-kDa protein were found in the serum and saliva of H. pylori-positive individuals only, and using the positive sera and saliva, laminin binding to the 25-kDa protein was inhibited. Thus, the 25-kDa laminin-binding protein is produced by H. pylori in infected hosts.

Review article: clinic-based testing for Helicobacter pylori infection by enzyme immunoassay of faeces, urine and saliva

Enzyme immunoassays have been used to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in human body materials such as faeces, urine and saliva. The stool antigen assay (HpSA), which uses polyclonal anti-H. pylori antibody as a capture reagent, has been widely used in the pre-treatment diagnosis of the infection in adults and children. Although the assay has the potential for monitoring eradication therapy, there are controversies over its use, especially at an early stage after treatment. The efficacy of the stool antigen assay can be modified by using monoclonal antibodies towards well characterized H. pylori faecal antigens. Two types of enzyme immunoassays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and immunochromatography) have been used to detect antibodies to H. pylori in urine. Immunochromatography of urine is a rapid assay well suited for epidemiological studies. The salivary ELISA, used in a number of studies, has shown inconsistent results with less than optimum sensitivity and specificity. Urinary and salivary immunoassays may not distinguish between past and present infections, thus limiting their potential to monitor eradication therapy.

Ecological and immunopathological implications of oral bacteria in Helicobacter pylori-infected disease

Increasing evidence has linked colonization by Helicobacter pylori with the development of gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. H. pylori resides primarily in the gastric mucosa without invading the gastric epithelium, causing persistent mild gastric inflammation. There are many reports examining the relationship between colonization by microorganisms in the stomach and oral cavity. We found that some oral bacteria are able to trap H. pylori cells, but oral bacteria inhibit H. pylori growth in vitro. In cases where H. pylori was detected in oral cavity samples, including oral cancer surface samples, we suggested that this species had colonized the stomach and were present in the oral cavity only as a transient organism. We demonstrated that periodontopathic Campylobacter rectus strains posses proteinaceous antigens, including heat shock proteins that share antigenicity with antigens of H. pylori strains. These cross-reactive antigens between H. pylori and C. rectus may be related to the induction of immunopathological responses in periodontal tissues and the stomach. We concluded that H. pylori could not survive in the human oral cavity; however, there would be an interrelationship between periodontal disease due to C rectus and stomach diseases due to H. pylori.

Helicobacter pylori infection in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic disorders

BACKGROUND: In patients with hereditary bleeding disorders, upper gastrointestinal bleeding presents a life-threatening complication, while the role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in this group of patients has not been fully clarified in the literature. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of H. pylori infection and of dental status in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic disorders (HHD). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with HHD (18 patients with and 19 without a history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding) and 26 control patients without HHD, who were admitted to our hospital for elective gastroscopy due to dyspeptic symptoms, were included in the study. Endoscopy was performed on all patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and on controls. ELISA was used to detect IgG, anti-CagA, and IgA antibodies to H. pylori in the serum and saliva of patients and controls. Moreover, dental status was examined using the decayed/missing/filled teeth index (DMFT) in all subjects. The chi(2)-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Some 64.8% of the patients and 65.4% of the controls had H. pylori IgG antibodies in serum (P>0.1, NS) while 54.05% of the patients and 34.6% of controls were anti-CagA-positive in serum (P=NS). However, 83 and 26.3% of the HHD patients with and without gastrointestinal bleeding, respectively, were serum anti-CagA-positive (P<0.01) while 72 and 58%, respectively, were serum IgG-positive (P=NS). H. pylori antibodies in saliva and the DMFT calculated index did not differ between the two subgroups. Subsequently, all serum anti-CagA-positive HHD patients received 1-week of triple H. pylori eradication therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin orally. During a 2-year follow-up, none of these patients reported upper gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Although no statistically significant difference in H. pylori infection was found between HHD and controls, the CagA strain appeared more frequently in those HHD patients with a history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Given our results and the limited data available in the literature, we would recommend anti-CagA screening and therapy to all patients with HHD. However, further studies with a longer follow-up and a greater number of patients are necessary.

The use of an oral fluid immunoglobulin G ELISA for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

BACKGROUND

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) evaluation of oral fluid immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to Helicobacter pylori is a unique approach for both epidemiological studies and the diagnosis of infection, especially in children. The use of oral fluid sampling to evaluate specific H. pylori IgG antibodies has advantages over serum, including reduced biohazard risk and noninvasive collection. Oral fluid sampling is fast and involves minimal patient discomfort. Since children facilitate transmission of H. pylori infection, a simple, accurate, noninvasive diagnostic test is necessary for large epidemiologic studies. The aim of our study was to evaluate a new oral fluid ELISA for detection of IgG antibodies to H. pylori in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared this new oral fluid ELISA with the HM-CAPTM serum ELISA and gastric biopsy histology using 779 oral fluid samples from children collected at 11 clinical sites across the United States. This cohort included 315 children symptomatic for abdominal pain and 464 asymptomatic. All samples were evaluated in a double blind manner. The oral fluid ELISA demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 94.0% in children 2 months old to 201/2 years, as compared with the HM-CAPTM serologic assay. The assay's sensitivity improved to 81.3% in children aged 5 or greater and the specificity remained at 94.0%. When compared with gastric biopsy histology in the same age group, the oral fluid ELISA demonstrated a sensitivity of 71.7% and a specificity of 90.4%.

RESULTS

This new oral fluid ELISA is moderately sensitive and offers a very specific method for detecting H. pylori infection in older children, but it is of little value in children under the age of 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we conclude that this oral fluid ELISA does not appear to be a helpful clinical tool for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children: comparison of a salivary immunoglobulin G antibody test with the [(13)C]urea breath test

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in a population-based sample of 477 children (mean age plus minus standard deviation, 5.8 plus minus 0.5 years) determined by the [(13)C]urea breath test ([(13)C]UBT) was 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 13.8%), and that determined by salivary enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was 11.9% (95% CI, 9.2 to 15.2%). Compared to the [(13)C]UBT, the sensitivity and specificity of the salivary ELISA were 80.9% (95% CI, 66.3 to 90.4%) and 95.3% (95% CI, 92.7 to 97.1%), respectively.

Helicobacter pylori in school children from the Western province of Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in Sri Lanka and nothing is known about its prevalence in children. Therefore the prevalence of H. pylori in a group of school children in Sri Lanka was determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The presence of H. pylori colonisation was determined by detection of faecal antigen and salivary antibody (IgG) by enzyme immuno assay, in 184 children aged between 5 and 19 years, in the Western Province-Colombo district of Sri Lanka.

RESULTS

Overall, only 12/184 (6.5%) had detectable H. pylori antigen in their stools and were considered infected with H. pylori, while 51/184 (27.7%) had H. pylori IgG in saliva. H. pylori salivary IgG declined with age while H. pylori antigen detection increased with age. H. pylori infection, as determined by salivary antibody (66%), was greater in children living in overcrowded conditions, although this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of H. pylori among school children in Sri Lanka was 6.5% by detection of faecal antigen and 27.7% by detection of salivary antibody, respectively. Initial infection with H. pylori appeared to occur in early childhood whilst active disease began in late childhood. Overcrowding appears to facilitate the transmission of the organism. Overall the prevalence of H. pylori was low in Sri Lanka compared with other countries in South-east Asia.

Shared antigenicity between Helicobacter pylori and periodontopathic Campylobacter rectus strains

Periodontopathic Campylobacter rectus strains possess 41- and 68-kDa proteinaceous antigens which share antigenicity with antigens of Helicobacter pylori strains. H. pylori strains have a 54-kDa antigen which reacts with C. rectus strains. We found that the salivary IgA levels against H. pylori were correlated with those against C. rectus. These cross-reactive antigens of C. rectus may affect the serological diagnosis of H. pylori infections, especially when saliva is used. It is possible that these cross-reacting antigens may relate to the induction of immunopathological responses against both microorganisms.

Comparison of invasive and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

BACKGROUND

Acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection occurs mainly during childhood. To study the events associated with H. pylori colonization in children it is important to have reliable diagnostic methods. Our objective was to validate invasive and noninvasive tests for diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children before and after antimicrobial treatment.

METHODS

Before treatment, invasive rapid urease test (RUT) culture and histology, as well as the noninvasive carbon-13 urea breath test (13C-UBT) and serology were validated in 59 children. The gold standard for H. pylori infection was any of three positives of the five tests. After antimicrobial treatment culture, histology, and 13C-UBT were validated in 43 children to determine eradication. The gold standard for eradication was negative in all three tests.

RESULTS

For primary diagnosis, RUT was the most sensitive and specific test, followed by 13C-UBT, which performed better than serology, culture, and histology. Concordance tests also showed that RUT and 13C-UBT performed better. For determination of eradication, 13C-UBT and histology were better than culture, which showed poor sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

RUT performed better for primary diagnosis. However, as endoscopy might not be indicated in most children, 13C-UBT could be the test of choice for diagnosis of H. pylori infection both before and after eradication treatment.

Diagnosis of invasive amebiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of saliva to detect amebic lectin antigen and anti-lectin immunoglobulin G antibodies

Saliva from subjects with amebic liver abscess (ALA), acute amebic colitis, asymptomatic infection with Entamoeba histolytica or Entamoeba dispar, and uninfected controls was tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of E. histolytica galactose-inhibitable lectin antigen and salivary immunoglobulin (IgG) antibodies to a recombinant cysteine-rich lectin-derived protein (LC3). Salivary lectin antigen was found in 65.8% of subjects with acute colitis, compared to 22.2% of those convalescent from ALA, 10.0% with asymptomatic E. histolytica infection, 9.8% with E. dispar infection, and 2.6% of controls (subjects from the United States and study patients with nonamebic diarrhea) (P < 0.001 for each compared to values for subjects with colitis). Salivary anti-LC3 IgG antibodies were found in 92% of ALA patients regardless of duration of illness and in 83.3% of colitis patients who were symptomatic for at least 7 days (P < 0.001 compared to other study groups). Serum anti-LC3 IgG antibodies were detected in 56.3% of subjects with acute colitis, 100% of subjects with ALA or prolonged colitis, 45% of subjects with asymptomatic E. histolytica infection, 32.3% of subjects with E. dispar infection, and 23.4% of diarrhea controls. In comparison to ELISA for serum anti-LC3 IgG antibodies, the salivary lectin antigen assay is a more sensitive and specific test for acute amebic colitis. Detection of salivary anti-LC3 IgG antibodies by ELISA is an effective means for the diagnosis of ALA and prolonged cases of amebic colitis.

[Antibodies against Helicobacter pylori in saliva. Study of their validity versus breath test and its agreement with serology]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate prospectively the validity of a new diagnostic method based on a saliva sample, taking as reference the breath test with 13C-marked urea, and to compare the results of this technique with another indirect method based on the detection of antibodies, "classical" serology using venous blood.

METHODS

48 individuals, 24 healthy volunteers and 24 consecutive patients with gastro-duodenal ulcer disease, were studied prospectively. Treatment during the previous month with gastro-erosive medication, antibiotics, proton-pump inhibitors or bismuth-derived drugs, prior treatment to eradicate H. pylori, gastric surgery and the presence of linked illnesses, were all considered criteria of exclusion from the study. For the diagnostic test in saliva a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, trademark Helisal) was used; and for blood serology, another commercial ELISA (Helico-G). The staff responsible for reading the saliva, serology and breath tests did not know the result of the other diagnostic methods. The result of the breath test with 13C-urea (TAU-kit) was taken as the reference standard for H. pylori infection.

RESULTS

The mean age of the healthy volunteers was 23 +/- 0.7 years; and of ulcer patients, 55 +/- 18. The prevalence of H. pylori infection, valued by the gold standard, was 79.2% in the ulcer patients and 54% in the volunteers. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of the saliva test in the ulcer patients were, respectively: 100% (95% CI, 79-99), 60% (17-93), 90% (68-98), 100% (31-97) and 92% (71-98). In the volunteers these figures were: 46% (20-74), 73% (39-93), 67% (31-91), 53% (27-78) and 58% (37-77). The serology results were better, with 100% sensitivity in both groups and outstanding diagnostic accuracy (92% and 96% for ulcer patients and volunteers, respectively). Concordance between serology and the saliva test in ulcer patients was perfect (kappa, 1). However, in asymptomatic individuals concordance was deficient (kappa, 0.28), and the prevalence of infection diagnosed with the two tests was not homogeneous (McNemar, 2.8; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic test for H. pylori infection in saliva is lacking in diagnostic accuracy in healthy individuals, which indicates that it cannot be used for screening infection in the asymptomatic population. The technique is more valuable in ulcer patients, although it does not reach the specificity desirable. For these reasons, the saliva test evaluated in this study cannot be recommended for diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

Gastrointestinal infections in children

Despite the important contribution of Helicobacter and Campylobacter infections to human disease, understanding of these organisms has lagged behind that of other enteropathogens. Developments in the molecular genetics of Helicobacter and Campylobacter species, however, undoubtedly will provide additional insights into the pathogenesis of infections caused by these related enteric pathogens.

Suggestion against an oral-oral route of transmission for Helicobacter pylori infection: a seroepidemiological study in a rural area

In this study the seroepidemiology of H. pylori and Epstein-Barr virus was compared in the same setting. A sample of 705 subjects completed a structured questionnaire. A serum sample was drawn from each subject and assayed for H. pylori IgG. Antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus were determined in a subgroup of 466 subjects. Cross-tabulation of data showed that 274 (58.8%) subjects were seropositive and 20 (4.3%) were seronegative for both infections, 17 (3.6%) were seropositive for H. pylori, and 155 (33.3%) were seropositive for Epstein-Barr virus (odds ratio=2.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.008-4.3). Nevertheless, the agreement between H. pylori and Epstein-Barr virus seropositivity was no better than chance (kappa=0.067) and the age-related seroprevalence curve of Epstein-Barr virus was similar in H. pylori seropositive and seronegative subjects. Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analysis did not show any risk factor shared by both infections. The findings of this study do not support the hypothesis that H. pylori and Epstein-Barr virus share a common mode of transmission. It can be speculated that the oral cavity may not be an important reservoir for H. pylori.