Multiplication of Coxsackie B1 virus in synchronized HeLa cells

Multiple functions of the nonstructural protein 3D in picornavirus infection

3D polymerase, also known as RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, is encoded by all known picornaviruses, and their structures are highly conserved. In the process of picornavirus replication, 3D polymerase facilitates the assembly of replication complexes and directly catalyzes the synthesis of viral RNA. The nuclear localization signal carried by picornavirus 3D polymerase, combined with its ability to interact with other viral proteins, viral RNA and cellular proteins, indicate that its noncatalytic role is equally important in viral infections. Recent studies have shown that 3D polymerase has multiple effects on host cell biological functions, including inducing cell cycle arrest, regulating host cell translation, inducing autophagy, evading immune responses, and triggering inflammasome formation. Thus, 3D polymerase would be a very valuable target for the development of antiviral therapies. This review summarizes current studies on the structure of 3D polymerase and its regulation of host cell responses, thereby improving the understanding of picornavirus-mediated pathogenesis caused by 3D polymerase.

Molecular mimicry, bystander activation, or viral persistence: infections and autoimmune disease

Virus infections and autoimmune disease have long been linked. These infections often precede the occurrence of inflammation in the target organ. Several mechanisms often used to explain the association of autoimmunity and virus infection are molecular mimicry, bystander activation (with or without epitope spreading), and viral persistence. These mechanisms have been used separately or in various combinations to account for the immunopathology observed at the site of infection and/or sites of autoimmune disease, such as the brain, heart, and pancreas. These mechanisms are discussed in the context of multiple sclerosis, myocarditis, and diabetes, three immune-medicated diseases often linked with virus infections.

Myocarditis, microbes and autoimmunity

Acute and chronic myocarditis can be caused by a number of infectious agents, including viruses, bacteria and protozoa. These diseases are refractory to treatment, and the development of rational therapies will require a detailed understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the pathological inflammatory responses. Here, we review three infectious myocarditides that, despite the dissimilarity of the microorganisms, share several common features: (i) the microbes replicate in the heart; but (ii) are difficult to isolate, in infectious form, during chronic disease; (iii) autoreactive antibodies and T cells specific for cardiac antigens have been identified in infected animals; and (iv) these autoreactive responses have been proposed as the main effectors of cell death, and myocardial damage. We critically evaluate the data, and we suggest that the findings can be reconciled without invoking autoimmunity as an effector mechanism. Alternative hypotheses to explain the tissue destruction are proposed.

Cell cycle status affects coxsackievirus replication, persistence, and reactivation in vitro

Enteroviral persistence has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several chronic human diseases, including dilated cardiomyopathy, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and chronic inflammatory myopathy. However, these viruses are considered highly cytolytic, and it is unclear what mechanisms might permit their long-term survival. Here, we describe the generation of a recombinant coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP), which we used to mark and track infected cells in vitro. Following exposure of quiescent tissue culture cells to either wild-type CVB3 or eGFP-CVB3, virus production was very limited but increased dramatically after cells were permitted to divide. Studies with cell cycle inhibitors revealed that cells arrested at the G(1) or G(1)/S phase could express high levels of viral polyprotein and produced abundant infectious virus. In contrast, both protein expression and virus yield were markedly reduced in quiescent cells (i.e., cells in G(0)) and in cells blocked at the G(2)/M phase. Following infection with eGFP-CVB3, quiescent cells retained viral RNA for several days in the absence of infectious virus production. Furthermore, RNA extracted from nonproductive quiescent cells was infectious when transfected into dividing cells, indicating that CVB3 appears to be capable of establishing a latent infection in G(0) cells, at least in tissue culture. Finally, wounding of infected quiescent cells resulted in viral protein expression limited to cells in and adjacent to the lesion. We suggest that (i) cell cycle status determines the distribution of CVB3 during acute infection and (ii) the persistence of CVB3 in vivo may rely on infection of quiescent (G(0)) cells incapable of supporting viral replication; a subsequent change in the cell cycle status may lead to virus reactivation, triggering chronic viral and/or immune-mediated pathology in the host.

Invasiveness of Salmonella typhimurium in HEp-2 cell cultures pretreated with UV-inactivated coxsackie virus

The invasiveness of Salmonella typhimurium was significantly enhanced in cell cultures pretreated with UV-inactivated virus. During the first 3 hours of virus infection there was no difference between the enhancement achieved with non-inactivated and that achieved with UV-inactivated virus. After 4 and 5 hours pretreatment the effect of non-inactivated virus was more pronounced than that of UV-inactivated virus. The results indicate that during the early period of virus infection the enhancement of bacterial invasiveness by pretreatment with virus is the result of a direct interaction between the virus and the cell membrane. During the later phase of viral reproduction, viral RNA induced alteration of the cell metabolism, and these altered products might be involved in the interaction.

Virus genome integration as a function of the host cell genome replicative cycle

Mouse 3T3 cells were grown and synchronized in monolayer with the double thymidine block. Their infection with SV40 took place continuously during the cellular cycle. However, integration of viral DNA into host cell DNA occurred preferentially during the S phase. Phase G1 appeared to be necessary for virus-cell DNA recombination in S phase. Phase G2 did not alter the stability of the integrated viral genome.

Cell cycle-dependent multiplication of avian adenoviruses in chicken embryo fibroblasts

Propagation of CELO virus employing confluent monolayers of chicken enbryo fibroblasts (CEF) yielded virus titers one to two logs lower than those from confluent chicken kidney (CK) cells. An enhancement of virus production in CEF as measured by plaque formation was obtainedby infectng cultures in the growing non confluent state. Measurements of 3H-thymidine incorporation revealed a positive correlation between the DNA synthesis of CEF cultures at the time of inoculation and the amount of progeny virus, whereas in the CK-CELO-system no such relation was observed. Requirement of replicative fibroblasts for CELO multiplication was also demonstrated by comparison of virus replication in synchronized stationary and serum stimulated CEF cells. In stationary CEF cells arrested in the G1 phase of the cell replication cycle by serum deprivation and infected withe CELO virs, no cytopathic effect could be observed, and only very low amounts of virus were produced. But 24 hours after release of these cells for growth by serum stimulation a logarithmic rate of virus multiplication and a complete CPE occurred. Infection of synchronized CEF cultures at different stages of the cell cycle revealed that CELO multiplication was correlated with the S phase of the infected cell. In synchronized CELO infected CEF cultures viral DNA synthesis started 12 to 14 hours after growth stimulation when cells were near the end of the S phase. In contrast, no viral DNA synthesis could be measured in growth arrested CELO infected CEF cells, when cellular DNA synthesis was low. Therefore not only production of infectious virus but also viral DNA synthesis is correlated with events during the S phase of the infected CEF cell.