Adeno-associated virus major Rep78 protein disrupts binding of TATA-binding protein to the p97 promoter of human papillomavirus type 16

The interaction of human papillomaviruses and adeno-associated viruses in suppressive co-infections

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common oncogenic viruses which cause malignancy in different epithelial surfaces of the human body and its infection is the main cause of cervical cancer. However, research suggests that this virus might not be the sole cause of infection in target cells. It is believed that, other infectious agents could co-infect the same cell with HPV including; bacteria, viruses, and parasites, which may have different effects on the carcinogenesis of HPV infections. One of the most important viruses is adeno-associated virus (AAV), which comes from the parvoviridae family. The function of this virus is associated with several stages of HPV carcinogenicity, which leads to the suppression of HPV oncogenesis. The inhibition effects of AAV are exerted not only in viral parts but also in cellular parts. This suppression illuminates a new therapeutic approach in the way of HPV-associated cervical cancer. In the present review we consider the exact roles of AAV infection in this suppression.

Cervical cancer isolate PT3, super-permissive for adeno-associated virus replication, over-expresses DNA polymerase delta, PCNA, RFC and RPA

BACKGROUND

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 2 is an important virus due to its use as a safe and effective human gene therapy vector and its negative association with certain malignancies. AAV, a dependo-parvovirus, autonomously replicates in stratified squamous epithelium. Such tissue occurs in the nasopharynx and anogenitals, from which AAV has been clinically isolated. Related autonomous parvoviruses also demonstrate cell tropism and preferentially replicate in oncogenically transformed cells. Combining these two attributes of parvovirus tropism, squamous and malignant, we assayed if AAV might replicate in squamous cervical carcinoma cell isolates.

RESULTS

Three primary isolates (PT1-3) and two established cervical cancer cell lines were compared to normal keratinocytes (NK) for their ability to replicate AAV. One isolate, PT3, allowed for high levels of AAV DNA replication and virion production compared to others. In research by others, four cellular components are known required for in vitro AAV DNA replication: replication protein A (RPA), replication factor C (RFC), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and DNA polymerase delta (POLD1). Thus, we examined PT3 cells for expression of these components by DNA microarray and real-time quantitative PCR. All four components were over-expressed in PT3 over two representative low-permissive cell isolates (NK and PT1). However, this super-permissiveness did not result in PT3 cell death by AAV infection.

CONCLUSION

These data, for the first time, provide evidence that these four cellular components are likely important for AAV in vivo DNA replication as well as in vitro. These data also suggest that PT3 will be a useful reagent for investigating the AAV-permissive transcriptome and AAV anti-cancer effect.

AAV-2 Rep78 and HPV-16 E1 interact in vitro, modulating their ATPase activity

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a nonpathogenic single-stranded human parvovirus which usually requires the presence of a "helper" virus for strong DNA replication. In addition to adeno- and herpes viruses, human papillomavirus (HPV) can serve as an AAV helper. We recently published that HPV type 16 (HPV-16) E1 protein contributes significantly as an individual helper gene for AAV-2 DNA replication and transcription. As Rep78 and E1 are the corresponding DNA helicase/replication proteins of AAV and HPV, respectively, and Rep78 and E1 have a degree of homology, we assayed whether these two proteins interact physically. The full length proteins were purified from bacteria as GST-E1 and MBP-Rep78 and used in five assays to observe Rep78-E1 interactions. All five assays (pull-down, coimmunoprecipitation, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemical cross-linking, and ATPase activity) provided evidence consistent with Rep78-E1 interaction. Most intriguing, an overall decrease in ATPase activity was observed when both proteins were present together. These data strongly suggest that E1 and Rep78 interact and that this interaction modulates at least some of their individual biochemical functions. This study adds to our understanding of AAV-HPV interaction biology, E1's modulation of Rep78 biochemistry, Rep78's modulation of E1 biochemistry and provides initial clues which may lead to the underlying mechanism of HPV E1 helper function for AAV DNA replication.

Adeno-associated virus type 2 p5 promoter: a rep-regulated DNA switch element functioning in transcription, replication, and site-specific integration

The large Rep proteins, p68 and p78, function as master controllers of the adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) life cycle, involved in transcriptional control, in latency, in rescue, and in viral DNA replication. The p5 promoter may be the nucleic acid complement to the large Rep proteins. It drives expression of the large Rep proteins, it undergoes autoregulation by Rep, it undergoes induction by helper virus, it is a target substrate for Rep-mediated site-specific integration (RMSSI), and it can function as a replicative origin. To better understand the relationship between each of the p5 functions, we have determined the effects of p5 promoter mutations (p5 integration efficiency element, or p5IEE) on transcription, integration, and replication using RMSSI transfection protocols in HeLa cells. The data demonstrate that the organization of the p5 promoter provides a unique platform for regulated AAV2 template transcription and subsequent repression by Rep through direct and indirect mechanisms. The elements of the p5IEE that define its function as a promoter also define its function as a highly optimized substrate for Rep-mediated site-specific integration and replication. The p5 Rep binding element (RBE) is essential in RMSSI and Rep-dependent replication; however, replacement of the p5 RBE with either the AAV2 inverted terminal repeat or the AAVS1 RBE sequence elements neither enhances nor severely compromises RMSSI activity of p5IEE. The RBE by itself or in combination with the YY1+1 initiator/terminal resolution sequence element does not mediate efficient site-specific integration. We found that replication and integration were highly sensitive to sequence manipulations of the p5 TATA/RBE/YY1+1 core structure in a manner that reflects the function of these elements in transcription. The data presented support a model where, depending on the state of the cell (Rep expression and helper virus influences), the p5IEE operates as a transcription/integration switch sequence element.

Effects of adeno-associated virus on adenovirus replication and gene expression during coinfection

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a nonpathogenic parvovirus that requires adenovirus (Ad) or another helper virus for a fully permissive infection. AAV-mediated inhibition of Ad is well documented, yet many details of this interaction remain unclear. In this study, we observed a maximum 50-fold decrease in infectious virus production and a 10- to 40-fold reduction in Ad DNA synthesis during coinfections with AAV. With the exception of the E3 gene, AAV decreased all steady-state Ad mRNA levels at 24 h postinfection (hpi) in a dose-dependent manner. However, not all transcription units were affected equally. E4 and late transcription were the most strongly inhibited, and E1A and E2A were the least affected. The temporal effects of AAV on Ad mRNA transcript levels also varied among the Ad genes. Ad protein expression paralleled mRNA levels at 24 hpi, suggesting that coinfecting AAV does not exert substantial effects on translation. In plasmid transfection assays, Rep78 protein most effectively limited Ad amplification, while Rep40 had no effect. Since E2a and E4 proteins are essential for efficient Ad DNA amplification, we examined the relationship between reduced E2A and E4 expression and decreased DNA amplification. Transfected Rep78 did not reduce E2A and E4 transcript levels prior to DNA replication. Also, AAV-induced inhibition of E2A and E4 mRNA production did not occur in the presence of hydroxyurea. It is therefore unlikely that decreased early gene expression is solely responsible for AAV's suppression of Ad DNA replication. Our results suggest that AAV amplification and/or Rep gene expression inhibits Ad DNA synthesis.

Adeno-associated virus rep protein-mediated inhibition of transcription of the adenovirus major late promoter in vitro

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that normally requires a helper virus such as adenovirus (Ad) for replication. The four AAV replication proteins (Rep78, Rep68, Rep52, and Rep40) are pleiotropic effectors of virus integration, replication, transcription, and virion assembly. These proteins exert effects on Ad gene expression and replication. In transient plasmid transfection assays, Rep proteins inhibit gene expression from a variety of transcription promoters. We have examined Rep protein-mediated inhibition of transcription of the Ad major late transcription promoter (AdMLP) in vitro. Rep78/68 are the strongest transcription suppressors and the purine nucleotide binding site in the Rep proteins, and by implication, the ATPase activity or conformational change induced by nucleotide binding is required for full repression. Rep52 has modest effects, and Rep40 exerts no significant effect on transcription. Rep78/68 and their N-terminal 225-residue domain bind to a 55-bp AdMLP DNA fragment in gel shift assays, suggesting that protein-DNA interactions are required for inhibition. This interaction was confirmed in DNase I protection assays and maps to a region extending from the TATA box to the transcription initiation site. Gel shift, DNase I, and chemical cross-linking assays with TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and Rep68 indicate that both proteins interact with each other and with the promoter at adjacent sites. The demonstration of Rep interaction with TBP and the AdMLP suggests that Rep78/68 alter the preinitiation complex of RNA polymerase II transcription. These observations provide new insight into the mechanism of Rep-mediated inhibition of gene expression.

Development of anticancer gene vaccine interact with human papillomavirus oncoprotein inhibition

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) Rep 78 protein is known to inhibit the promoter site of several oncogenes and viral genes, including the human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E6 transforming genes. The biochemical studies of Rep 78 have been reported, but the effects of Rep 78 gene-mediated inhibition of HPV 16 E6 promoter activity on the various human cervical carcinoma cells have not been characterized. pEGFP-N1 vector, cloned by AAV-mediated Rep 78, is transfected into cervical carcinoma cells. Transfection efficiency of Rep 78 was approximately 30-60% different. Messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression of Rep 78 gene was significantly higher on day 1 of the transfection of Rep 78 DNA in CaSki cells, and DNA level of HPV 16 E6 was decreased on day 1 of the transfection. The growth of CaSki cervical cancer cells was only 10-15% inhibited by Rep 78, and the other cervical cells, HeLa, HeLaS3, HT3, and QGU, were unaffected by Rep 78 transfection. In spite of the high efficiency of Rep 78 gene transformation and expression rate, we could not show the significant growth inhibition in various cervical cancer cell lines. Taken together, long-term expression of Rep 78 strategy might be needed for cervical carcinoma gene therapy using AAV vector.

Identification of an adeno-associated virus Rep protein binding site in the adenovirus E2a promoter

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) and other parvoviruses inhibit proliferation of nonpermissive cells. The mechanism of this inhibition is not thoroughly understood. To learn how AAV interacts with host cells, we investigated AAV's interaction with adenovirus (Ad), AAV's most efficient helper virus. Coinfection with Ad and AAV results in an AAV-mediated inhibition of Ad5 gene expression and replication. The AAV replication proteins (Rep) activate and repress gene expression from AAV and heterologous transcription promoters. To investigate the role of Rep proteins in the suppression of Ad propagation, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses that demonstrated in vivo AAV Rep protein interaction with the Ad E2a gene promoter. In vitro binding of purified AAV Rep68 protein to the Ad E2a promoter was characterized by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (Kd= 200 +/- 25 nM). A 38 bp, Rep68-protected region (5'-TAAGAGTCAGCGCGCAGTATTTACTGAAGAGAGCCT-3') was identified by DNase I footprint analysis. The 38-bp protected region contains the weak E2a TATA box, sequence elements that resemble the Rep binding sites identified by random sequence oligonucleotide selection, and the transcription start site. These results suggest that Rep binding to the E2a promoter contributes to the inhibition of E2a gene expression from the Ad E2a promoter and may affect Ad replication.

Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer

Of the many types of human papillomavirus (HPV), more than 30 infect the genital tract. The association between certain oncogenic (high-risk) strains of HPV and cervical cancer is well established. Although HPV is essential to the transformation of cervical epithelial cells, it is not sufficient, and a variety of cofactors and molecular events influence whether cervical cancer will develop. Early detection and treatment of precancerous lesions can prevent progression to cervical cancer. Identification of precancerous lesions has been primarily by cytologic screening of cervical cells. Cellular abnormalities, however, may be missed or may not be sufficiently distinct, and a portion of patients with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cytomorphology will have higher-grade disease identified by subsequent colposcopy and biopsy. Sensitive and specific molecular techniques that detect HPV DNA and distinguish high-risk HPV types from low-risk HPV types have been introduced as an adjunct to cytology. Earlier detection of high-risk HPV types may improve triage, treatment, and follow-up in infected patients. Currently, the clearest role for HPV DNA testing is to improve diagnostic accuracy and limit unnecessary colposcopy in patients with borderline or mildly abnormal cytologic test results.

Studies of the mechanism of transactivation of the adeno-associated virus p19 promoter by Rep protein

During adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 2 productive infections, the p19 promoter of AAV is activated by the AAV Rep78 and Rep68 proteins. Rep-induced activation of p19 depends on the presence of one of several redundant Rep binding elements (RBEs) within the p5 promoter or within the terminal repeats (TR). In the absence of the TR, the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 site at position -50 are essential for p19 transactivation. To determine how a Rep complex bound at p5 induces transcription at p19, we made a series of p19 promoter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs in which the p5 RBE was inserted at different locations upstream or downstream of the p19 mRNA start site. The RBE acted like a repressor element at most positions in the presence of both Rep and adenovirus (Ad), and the level of repression increased dramatically as the RBE was inserted closer to the p19 promoter. We concluded that the RBE by itself was not a conventional upstream activation signal and instead behaved like a repressor. To understand how the Rep-RBE complex within p5 activated p19, we considered the possibility that its role was to function as an architectural protein whose purpose was to bring other p5 transcriptional elements to the p19 promoter. In order to address this possibility, we replaced both the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 site with GAL4 binding sites. The modified GAL4-containing constructs were cotransfected with plasmids that expressed GAL4 fusion proteins capable of interacting through p53 and T-antigen (T-ag) protein domains. In the presence of Ad and the GAL4 fusion proteins, the p19 promoter exhibited strong transcriptional activation that was dependent on both the GAL4 fusion proteins and Ad infection. This suggested that the primary role of the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 sites was to act as a scaffold for bringing transcription complexes in the p5 promoter into close proximity with the p19 promoter. Since Rep and Sp1 themselves were not essential for transactivation, we tested mutants within the other p5 transcriptional elements in the context of GAL4-induced looping to determine which of the other p5 elements was necessary for p19 induction. Mutation of the p5 major late-transcription factor site reduced p19 activity but did not eliminate induction in the presence of the GAL4 fusion proteins. However, mutation of the p5 YY1 site at position -60 (YY1-60) eliminated GAL4-induced transactivation. This implicated the YY1-60 protein complexes in p19 induction by Rep. In addition, both basal p19 activity and activity in the presence of Ad increased when the YY1-60 site was mutated even in the absence of Rep or GAL4 fusion proteins. Therefore, there are likely to be alternative p5-p19 interactions that are Rep independent in which the YY1-60 complex inhibits p19 transcription. We concluded that transcriptional control of the p19 promoter was dependent on the formation of complexes between the p5 and p19 promoters and that activation of the p19 promoter depends largely on the ability of Rep and Sp1 to form a scaffold that positions the p5 YY1 complex near the p19 promoter.

Temporal acceleration of the human papillomavirus life cycle by adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 2 superinfection in natural host tissue

Epidemiologically, certain human papillomaviruses are positively associated with cervical cancer, while adeno-associated viruses (AAV-2) are negatively associated with this same cancer. Both HPV and AAV productively replicate in differentiating keratinocytes of the skin and interact with each other. However, AAV has a relatively fast life cycle, generating infectious progeny by the third to fourth day of an organotypic epithelial raft culture. In contrast, HPV is slow, generating infectious progeny only after 10-12 days. As earlier studies indicated that these two skin-tropic virus types significantly affect each other's life cycle, we investigated if the temporal kinetics of the slow HPV life cycle was affected by the fast AAV in raft cultures. Here it is shown that the presence of AAV-2 at a variety of multiplicities of infection (m.o.i.) resulted in early onset HPV-31b DNA replication. Using plasmids which each expressed only one of the four rep proteins, an enhancement affect was seen for all four rep proteins of AAV, with Rep40 having the highest activity. Furthermore, AAV (m.o.i. of 5) also resulted in a temporally accelerated production of HPV infectious units, seen as early as Day 4, with high levels of viral progeny being produced by Day 6.5. Like earlier studies at Day 12, histological differences were seen at Day 6.5 between AAV-infected and mock-infected HPV/rafts. These data suggest that under specific conditions the AAV rep trans-factors can positively regulate HPV gene expression in addition to the usual negative regulation that has been consistently observed by the rep proteins. These data also suggest that AAV has a significant effect upon the temporal kinetics of the HPV life cycle in natural host tissue. However, it is unclear if or how this AAV-induced fast HPV life cycle mechanistically correlates with lower rates of HPV-associated cervical disease.

Characterization of adeno-associated virus rep protein inhibition of adenovirus E2a gene expression

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) replication (Rep) proteins are pleiotropic effectors of viral DNA replication, RNA transcription, and site-specific integration into chromosome 19. In addition to regulating AAV gene expression, the Rep proteins modulate expression of a variety of cellular and viral genes. In this report we investigate Rep-mediated effects on expression of the adenovirus (Ad) E2a gene and the Ad major late promoter. We have found that all four Rep proteins repress E2a expression at the protein level, with Rep40 showing the weakest repression. Mutations in the purine nucleotide binding (PNB) site weakened each of the protein's abilities to repress expression. Analysis of steady-state E2a mRNA showed that Rep proteins decreased mRNA levels, but to a lesser extent than E2a protein levels. Analysis of mRNA stability demonstrated that neither Rep78 nor Rep52 affected E2a mRNA stability, suggesting that the decrease in mRNA is due to Rep-mediated inhibition of Ad E2a transcription. To determine if Rep68 proteins could directly inhibit RNA transcription, we performed in vitro transcription assays using HeLa nuclear extracts supplemented with Rep68 and Rep68PNB. We demonstrate that Rep68, but not mutant Rep68PNB, blocked in vitro transcription of a template containing the Ad major late promoter. These results provide insight into how AAV and its encoded Rep proteins interact with Ad and provide a model system for the study of AAV and host-cell interactions.

Inhibition of adenovirus cytotoxicity, replication, and E2a gene expression by adeno-associated virus

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) and the other parvoviruses have long been known to inhibit proliferation of nonpermissive cells. The mechanism of this inhibition is not thoroughly understood. To learn how AAV interacts with host cells, we have begun an investigation into AAV's relationship with adenovirus (Ad), AAV's most efficient helper virus. AAV, but not UV-inactivated AAV, delayed Ad-induced cytotoxicity and inhibited Ad E2a gene expression. AAV, but not UV-inactivated AAV or a recombinant AAV vector, inhibited Ad DNA replication. To determine whether AAV or its replication (Rep) proteins alter Ad early gene expression, we measured steady state E2a mRNA levels in AAV and Ad coinfected cultures and in a cell line (Neo6) that inducibly expresses the Rep proteins. AAV, but not UV-AAV, and Rep expression resulted in diminution of E2a protein and mRNA levels. To determine whether the AAV Rep proteins directly affect the individual Ad early promoters, we constructed luciferase reporter plasmids containing each of the five early promoters. Cotransfection of Ad-luciferase and an AAV rep gene-expressing plasmid in HeLa cells demonstrated that Rep78 repressed the E1a, E2a, and E4 promoters but trans-activated the E1b and E3 promoters. In the presence of a cotransfected E1a-expressing plasmid, Rep78 repressed expression from all five promoters. These results indicate that Rep may have different effects on the Ad early promoters dependent upon the presence of the E1a trans-activating protein.

Altered biology of adeno-associated virus type 2 and human papillomavirus during dual infection of natural host tissue

Adeno-associated virus (AAV), a common genital virus, may have a "protective" role against human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical cancer. Epidemiological studies indicate a negative correlation between AAV infection and the incidence of cervical cancer. In contrast, HPV is positively associated with cervical cancer. To investigate interactions between these two viruses we used the organotypic "raft" culture system. The raft culture system is capable of supporting the complete HPV life cycle. Raft tissues that were actively replicating HPV were superinfected with AAV type 2 (AAV-2). We observed a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.)-dependent enhancement and inhibition of HPV DNA replication, concomitant with AAV-2 replication. The data suggest that at low m.o.i. of AAV-2 infection, HPV DNA replication was slightly increased compared to controls and AAV-2 replicated poorly. At high AAV-2 m.o.i., HPV DNA replication was reduced and AAV-2 replicated to high levels. AAV-2 replication was increased in the presence of HPV compared to primary human keratinocyte, squamous cell carcinoma, and HaCat raft cultures infected with AAV-2 alone. These data suggest that HPV may provide types of "enhancer/helper" functions for AAV-2 replication and progeny formation. Infection with AAV-2 had significant effects on epithelial morphology. During infection with low m.o.i. of AAV-2 the epithelium stratified to a greater extent than in controls. With high m.o.i. of AAV-2 infections, tissue cytopathic effects were observed, indicating an additional factor responsible for the effect of AAV-2 on HPV replication and infection. Our results demonstrate a complex interaction between AAV-2, HPV, and skin during dual infection.

Recombinant adenovirus expressing adeno-associated virus cap and rep proteins supports production of high-titer recombinant adeno-associated virus

It has been difficult to produce a chimeric vector containing both Ad and AAV rep and cap, and to grow such chimeric vectors in 293 cells. By recombination in vitro in a bacterial host, we were able to produce recombinant plasmid AdAAV (pAdAAVrep-cap), which could be used to generate recombinant AdAAV (rAdAAVrep-cap) after transfection into 293 cells. A recombinant adenovirus, rAdAAVGFP, in which the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene is flanked by the AAV terminal repeats cloned into the E1-deleted site of Ad was also generated. Co-infection of rAdAAVrep-cap together with rAdAAVGFP into 293 cells resulted in production of high titers of rAAV expressing GFP. It was noted that the titer of rAdAAVrep-cap was lower than the titer of control AdCMVLacZ. The lower titer of rAdAAvrep-cap was associated with expression of Rep protein. Non-homologous recombination occurs after high passage and results in deletions within the AAV rep genes. These results indicate that (1) rAdAAVrep-cap can be produced; (2) rAdAAVrep-cap + rAdAAVGFP is a convenient and efficient way to transfect 293 cells to grow high titer rAAV; and (3) frozen stock is required to avoid propagation of rep-deleted pAdAAVrep-cap.

Adeno-associated virus is associated with a lower risk of high-grade cervical neoplasia

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a ubiquitous human helper-dependent parvovirus which may interact with human papillomaviruses (HPV) to modify a woman's risk of cervical neoplasia. This analysis was nested in a cohort study of low-income women receiving Pap smears as part of their family planning services. We selected cases (55 with high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and 162 with low-grade LSIL) and controls (96 women with normal cervical cytology) and analyzed cervical DNA for AAV, using PCR amplification/dot blot hybridization, and HPV, using hybrid capture I. AAV positivity was associated with a significantly reduced risk of HSIL (age and HPV-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.32) yet not with LSIL (aOR = 0.78); 53.8% of HSIL, 66.9% of LSIL, and 70.7% of controls were AAV+. AAV appears to interact with HPV to reduce SIL risk; relative to the HPV-/AAV+ exposure, the respective aORs for HSIL and HPV+/AAV-, HPV+/AAV+, and HPV-/AAV+ were 17.0, 6.9, and 3.5. AAV+ was not associated with age, race, HPV status, or sexual or reproductive risk factors. These results strongly suggest that AAV may play a protective or inhibitory role in late stage cervical carcinogenesis. This conclusion needs to be verified in additional epidemiologic studies.

Adeno-associated virus type 2 rep protein inhibits human papillomavirus type 16 E2 recruitment of the transcriptional coactivator p300

Infection by human adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) is a possible protective factor in the development of cervical carcinomas associated with human papillomaviruses (HPV). The replicative proteins of AAV2 (Rep) have been implicated in the inhibition of papillomavirus replication and transforming activities, although the molecular events underlying these effects are poorly understood. We observed that each of the four forms of AAV2 Rep inhibited the E1- and E2-driven replication of oncogenic HPV type 16 (HPV16). Rep40, corresponding to the C-terminal domain of all Rep proteins, inhibited both HPV DNA replication and HPV16 E2-mediated transactivation. Rep40 specifically bound the N-terminal transactivation domain of HPV16 E2 both in vitro and in vivo. This interaction was found to specifically disrupt the binding of E2 to the cellular transcriptional coactivator p300. Accordingly, the inhibitory effect of Rep on HPV16 E2 transactivation was rescued by the overexpression of p300. These data indicate a novel role of Rep in the down-regulation of papillomaviruses through inhibition of complex formation between the HPV16 E2 transcriptional activator and its cellular coactivator, p300.