A novel genetic pathway of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to stavudine mediated by the K65R mutation

Progression of Antiviral Agents Targeting Viral Polymerases

Viral DNA and RNA polymerases are two kinds of very important enzymes that synthesize the genetic materials of the virus itself, and they have become extremely favorable targets for the development of antiviral drugs because of their relatively conserved characteristics. There are many similarities in the structure and function of different viral polymerases, so inhibitors designed for a certain viral polymerase have acted as effective universal inhibitors on other types of viruses. The present review describes the development of classical antiviral drugs targeting polymerases, summarizes a variety of viral polymerase inhibitors from the perspective of chemically synthesized drugs and natural product drugs, describes novel approaches, and proposes promising development strategies for antiviral drugs.

Advances in Nucleoside and Nucleotide Analogues in Tackling Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hepatitis Virus Infections

Nucleoside and nucleotide analogues are structurally similar antimetabolites and are promising small-molecule chemotherapeutic agents against various infectious DNA and RNA viruses. To date, these analogues have not been documented in-depth as anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and anti-hepatitis virus agents, these are at various stages of testing ranging from pre-clinical, to those withdrawn from trials, or those that are approved as drugs. Hence, in this review, the importance of these analogues in tackling HIV and hepatitis virus infections is discussed with a focus on the viral genome and the mechanism of action of these analogues, both in a mutually exclusive manner and their role in HIV/hepatitis coinfection. This review encompasses nucleoside and nucleotide analogues from 1987 onwards, starting with the first nucleoside analogue, zidovudine, and going on to those in current clinical trials and even the drugs that have been withdrawn. This review also sheds light on the prospects of these nucleoside analogues in clinical trials as a treatment option for the COVID-19 pandemic.

Therapeutic potential of uracil and its derivatives in countering pathogenic and physiological disorders

Uracil is one of the most notable pharmacophores in medicinal chemistry as the pyrimidine nucleobase forms an integral part of many commercial drugs. Though the name uracil is usually associated with cancer drugs, there are many uracil-based compounds which can treat different diseases when they are employed. So far, there has been no in-depth review concerning uracil drugs in the market, or in the different stages of clinical trials, including those approved or discontinued. The current work focuses on the importance of uracil and its derivatives in treating different diseases. The use of uracil compounds in treating viral infections, cancer, diabetic, thyroid and autosomal recessive disorders are discussed in the review. The mechanism of action of each uracil drug with emphasis on their structure and properties are discussed in detail. The targeted action of these drugs on sites or on the different stages of a disorder/pathogenic life cycle are also discussed. This review encompasses uracil drugs approved as well as those in development from the 1950's onwards. The utility of uracil in drug discovery and its association with a wide range of diseases is brought forth within this review to demonstrate its potential to a wider audience.

Discovery and Development of Anti-HIV Therapeutic Agents: Progress Towards Improved HIV Medication

The history of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS therapy, which spans over 30 years, is one of the most dramatic stories of science and medicine leading to the treatment of a disease. Since the advent of the first AIDS drug, AZT or zidovudine, a number of agents acting on different drug targets, such as HIV enzymes (e.g. reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase) and host cell factors critical for HIV infection (e.g. CD4 and CCR5), have been added to our armamentarium to combat HIV/AIDS. In this review article, we first discuss the history of the development of anti-HIV drugs, during which several problems such as drug-induced side effects and the emergence of drug-resistant viruses became apparent and had to be overcome. Nowadays, the success of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy (cART), combined with recently-developed powerful but nonetheless less toxic drugs has transformed HIV/AIDS from an inevitably fatal disease into a manageable chronic infection. However, even with such potent cART, it is impossible to eradicate HIV because none of the currently available HIV drugs are effective in eliminating occult “dormant” HIV cell reservoirs. A number of novel unique treatment approaches that should drastically improve the quality of life (QOL) of patients or might actually be able to eliminate HIV altogether have also been discussed later in the review.

An association between K65R and HIV-1 subtype C viruses in patients treated with multiple NRTIs

Objectives: HIV-1 subtype C might have a greater propensity to develop K65R mutations in patients with virological failure compared with other subtypes. However, the strong association between viral subtype and confounding factors such as exposure groups and ethnicity affects the calculation of this propensity. We exploited the diversity of viral subtypes within the UK to undertake a direct comparative analysis.

Patients and methods: We analysed only sequences with major IAS-defined mutations from patients with virological failure. Prevalence of K65R was related to subtype and exposure to the NRTIs that primarily select for this mutation (tenofovir, abacavir, didanosine and stavudine). A multivariate logistic regression model quantified the effect of subtype on the prevalence of K65R, adjusting for previous and current exposure to all four specified drugs.

Results: Subtype B patients (n = 3410) were mostly MSM (78%) and those with subtype C (n = 810) were mostly heterosexual (82%). K65R was detected in 7.8% of subtype B patients compared with 14.2% of subtype C patients. The subtype difference in K65R prevalence was observed irrespective of NRTI exposure and K65R was frequently selected by abacavir, didanosine and stavudine in patients with no previous exposure to tenofovir. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that K65R was significantly more common in subtype C viruses (adjusted OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.55–2.62, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Patients with subtype C HIV-1 have approximately double the frequency of K65R in our database compared with other subtypes. The exact clinical implications of this finding need to be further elucidated.

Biochemical characterization of a multi-drug resistant HIV-1 subtype AG reverse transcriptase: antagonism of AZT discrimination and excision pathways and sensitivity to RNase H inhibitors

We analyzed a multi-drug resistant (MR) HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT), subcloned from a patient-derived subtype CRF02_AG, harboring 45 amino acid exchanges, amongst them four thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) relevant for high-level AZT (azidothymidine) resistance by AZTMP excision (M41L, D67N, T215Y, K219E) as well as four substitutions of the AZTTP discrimination pathway (A62V, V75I, F116Y and Q151M). In addition, K65R, known to antagonize AZTMP excision in HIV-1 subtype B was present. Although MR-RT harbored the most significant amino acid exchanges T215Y and Q151M of each pathway, it exclusively used AZTTP discrimination, indicating that the two mechanisms are mutually exclusive and that the Q151M pathway is obviously preferred since it confers resistance to most nucleoside inhibitors. A derivative was created, additionally harboring the TAM K70R and the reversions M151Q as well as R65K since K65R antagonizes excision. MR-R65K-K70R-M151Q was competent of AZTMP excision, whereas other combinations thereof with only one or two exchanges still promoted discrimination. To tackle the multi-drug resistance problem, we tested if the MR-RTs could still be inhibited by RNase H inhibitors. All MR-RTs exhibited similar sensitivity toward RNase H inhibitors belonging to different inhibitor classes, indicating the importance of developing RNase H inhibitors further as anti-HIV drugs.

Efficacy of topical tenofovir against transmission of a tenofovir-resistant SHIV in macaques

Background

Topically delivered tenofovir (TFV) from intravaginal rings, tablets, or gels is being evaluated for HIV prevention. We previously demonstrated that TFV delivered vaginally by gel protected macaques from vaginal infection with SHIV. Here we investigated efficacy of the TFV gel against vaginal transmission of a TFV-resistant SHIV containing the K65R mutation (SHIV162P3_K65R) and its relationship to drug levels in vaginal tissues.

Results

SHIV162P3_K65R shows approximately a 5-fold reduction in susceptibility to TFV compared to wild-type SHIV. Efficacy was evaluated in pig-tailed macaques exposed vaginally twice-weekly (up to 10 weeks) to SHIV162P3_K65R 30 min after receiving placebo (n = 6) or 1% TFV (n = 6) gel. Four of the six controls were infected after a median of 5 exposures. In contrast, five of six macaques that received TFV gel remained uninfected after 20 vaginal SHIV162P3_K65R exposures, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 75%. The mean intracellular TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentrations in vaginal lymphocytes 4 h after a single gel dose were found to be high (1,631 fmol/10⁶ cells, range 492–3,847) and within the in vitro IC₇₅ range (1,206 fmol/10⁶ cells) for SHIV162P3_K65R.

Conclusion

Both the modest resistance conferred by K65R and the high TFV-DP exposure in vaginal lymphocytes, likely explain the observed protection. The findings in this model do not predict complete loss of protection by topical TFV against vaginal exposure to HIV-1_K65R viruses and provide a tissue drug target for high efficacy. These data will facilitate the development of TFV delivery platforms that have high activity on both wild-type and TFV-resistant viruses.

HIV reverse-transcriptase drug resistance mutations during early infection reveal greater transmission diversity than in envelope sequences

BACKGROUND

Drug resistance mutations (DRMs) can serve as distinct, nonpolymorphic markers for evaluating diversity of expressed HIV-1. We screened for DRMs during early-acute viremia and examined the diversity in reverse transcriptase (RT) relative to envelope (env) in cases of transmitted drug resistance.

METHODS

We evaluated 111 longitudinal plasma samples collected every 2-7 days from 15 individuals who seroconverted for HIV-1 infection in 1994-2000. The samples were screened with sensitive polymerase chain reaction assays for the commonly transmitted M41L and K70R mutations and for K65R, which was undetected by bulk sequencing. Mutation-positive samples were further characterized by clonal sequencing of RT and env V1-V3.

RESULTS

Drug resistance mutations were detected in 4 of 15 seroconverters at 5-50 days of viral nucleic acid expression; most mutations disappeared about the time of seroconversion. Clonal sequencing verified low-level K65R at frequencies of 0.4%-4.9%. In each case, K65R coexisted unlinked with variants carrying 2-5 thymidine analog mutations at frequencies of 1.6%-23.0%. In one seroconverter, variants with M184V and nonnucleoside RT inhibitor mutations were also identified at first RNA expression. Each seroconverter displayed a homogeneous V1-V3 env population.

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse-transcriptase DRMs demonstrate that the breadth of variants in transmission may be greater than what is reflected in envelope sequences.

Increased risk of Q151M and K65R mutations in patients failing stavudine-containing first-line antiretroviral therapy in Cambodia

Background

Multi-nucleos(t)ide resistance (MNR) mutations including Q151M, K65R mutations, and insertion at codon 69 of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase coding region may confer resistance to all molecules of nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). The presence of these mutations is an emerging problem compromising non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors-based therapies. Furthermore, factors associated with selection of these mutations are still not well defined. The current study aimed to evaluate the frequency and to characterize factors associated with the occurrence of multi-nucleos(t)ide resistance mutations among HIV-1 infected patients failing recommended first-line antiretroviral regimens in Cambodia.

Methodology/Principal Finding

This is a retrospective analysis of HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping of 520 HIV-1 infected patients in virological failure (viral load > 250 copies/mL) while on first-line antiretroviral therapy in Cambodia with at least one reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance associated mutation. Among these 520 patients, a total of 66 subjects (66/520, 12.7%) presented ≥1 MNR mutation, including Q151M, K65R, and Insert69 for 59 (11.3%), 29 (5.6%), and 2 (0.4%) patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis, both Q151M (p = 0.039) and K65R (p = 0.029) mutations were independently associated with current stavudine- compared to zidovudine-use.

Conclusion

Such selection of mutations by stavudine drastically limits the choice of antiretroviral molecules available for second-line therapy in resource-limited settings. This finding supports the World Health Organization’s recommendation for stavudine phase-out.

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations associated with first-line stavudine-containing antiretroviral therapy: programmatic implications for countries phasing out stavudine

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines recommend phasing-out stavudine because of its risk of long-term toxicity. There are two mutational pathways of stavudine resistance with different implications for zidovudine and tenofovir cross-resistance, the primary candidates for replacing stavudine. However, because resistance testing is rarely available in resource-limited settings, it is critical to identify the cross-resistance patterns associated with first-line stavudine failure.

METHODS

We analyzed HIV-1 resistance mutations following first-line stavudine failure from 35 publications comprising 1,825 individuals. We also assessed the influence of concomitant nevirapine vs. efavirenz, therapy duration, and HIV-1 subtype on the proportions of mutations associated with zidovudine vs. tenofovir cross-resistance.

RESULTS

Mutations with preferential zidovudine activity, K65R or K70E, occurred in 5.3% of individuals. Mutations with preferential tenofovir activity, ≥ two thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) or Q151M, occurred in 22% of individuals. Nevirapine increased the risk of TAMs, K65R, and Q151M. Longer therapy increased the risk of TAMs and Q151M but not K65R. Subtype C and CRF01_AE increased the risk of K65R, but only CRF01_AE increased the risk of K65R without Q151M.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of concomitant nevirapine vs. efavirenz, therapy duration, or subtype, tenofovir was more likely than zidovudine to retain antiviral activity following first-line d4T therapy.

Multilabel classification for exploiting cross-resistance information in HIV-1 drug resistance prediction

MOTIVATION

Antiretroviral treatment regimens can sufficiently suppress viral replication in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients and prevent the progression of the disease. However, one of the factors contributing to the progression of the disease despite ongoing antiretroviral treatment is the emergence of drug resistance. The high mutation rate of HIV can lead to a fast adaptation of the virus under drug pressure, thus to failure of antiretroviral treatment due to the evolution of drug-resistant variants. Moreover, cross-resistance phenomena have been frequently found in HIV-1, leading to resistance not only against a drug from the current treatment, but also to other not yet applied drugs. Automatic classification and prediction of drug resistance is increasingly important in HIV research as well as in clinical settings, and to this end, machine learning techniques have been widely applied. Nevertheless, cross-resistance information was not taken explicitly into account, yet.

RESULTS

In our study, we demonstrated the use of cross-resistance information to predict drug resistance in HIV-1. We tested a set of more than 600 reverse transcriptase sequences and corresponding resistance information for six nucleoside analogues. Based on multilabel classification models and cross-resistance information, we were able to significantly improve overall prediction accuracy for all drugs, compared with single binary classifiers without any additional information. Moreover, we identified drug-specific patterns within the reverse transcriptase sequences that can be used to determine an optimal order of the classifiers within the classifier chains. These patterns are in good agreement with known resistance mutations and support the use of cross-resistance information in such prediction models.

CONTACT

dominik.heider@uni-due.de

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

HIV-1 antiretroviral drug therapy

The most significant advance in the medical management of HIV-1 infection has been the treatment of patients with antiviral drugs, which can suppress HIV-1 replication to undetectable levels. The discovery of HIV-1 as the causative agent of AIDS together with an ever-increasing understanding of the virus replication cycle have been instrumental in this effort by providing researchers with the knowledge and tools required to prosecute drug discovery efforts focused on targeted inhibition with specific pharmacological agents. To date, an arsenal of 24 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs are available for treatment of HIV-1 infections. These drugs are distributed into six distinct classes based on their molecular mechanism and resistance profiles: (1) nucleoside-analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), (2) non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), (3) integrase inhibitors, (4) protease inhibitors (PIs), (5) fusion inhibitors, and (6) coreceptor antagonists. In this article, we will review the basic principles of antiretroviral drug therapy, the mode of drug action, and the factors leading to treatment failure (i.e., drug resistance).

Comparative analysis of drug resistance among B and the most prevalent non-B HIV type 1 subtypes (C, F, and CRF02_AG) in Italy

In recent years, increasing numbers of patients infected with HIV-1 non-B subtypes have been treated with modern antiretroviral regimens. Therefore, a better knowledge of HIV drug resistance in non-B strains is crucial. Thus, we compared the mutational pathways involved in drug resistance among the most common non-B subtypes in Italy (F, C, and CRF02_AG) and the B subtype. In total, 2234 pol sequences from 1231 virologically failing patients from Central Italy were analyzed. The prevalence of resistance mutations in protease and reverse transcriptase between non-B and B subtypes has been evaluated. Among patients treated with nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and with thymidine analogues (TA) experience, TAMs1 M41L and L210W were less prevalent in CRF02_AG, while TAMs2 T215F and K219E were more prevalent in the F subtype. In NRTI-treated patients having experience with abacavir, didanosine, tenofovir, or stavudine the K65R mutation was mostly prevalent in the C subtype. In non-NRTI (NNRTI)-treated patients infected by the C subtype the prevalence of K103N was lower than in patients infected with other subtypes, while the prevalence of Y181C and Y188L was higher compared to subtype B. The prevalence of Y181C was higher also in subtype F as compared to subtype B. In patients treated with protease inhibitors, L89V was predominantly found in CRF02_AG, while the TPV resistance mutation T74P was predominantly found in the C subtype. Some differences in the genotypic drug resistance have been found among patients infected with B, C, F, and CRF02_AG subtypes in relationship to treatment. These results may be useful for the therapeutic management of individuals infected with HIV-1 non-B strains.

Clinical significance of HIV reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-resistance mutations

In this article, we summarize recent knowledge on drug-resistance mutations within HIV reverse transcriptase (RT). Several large-scale HIV-1 genotypic analyses have revealed that the most prevalent nucleos(t)ide analog RT inhibitor (NRTI)-resistance mutation is M184V/I followed by a series of thymidine analog-associated mutations: M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F and K219Q/E. Among non-nucleoside RT inhibitor (NNRTI)-resistance mutations, K103N was frequently observed, followed by Y181C and G190A. Interestingly, V106M was identified in HIV-1 subtype C as a subtype-specific multi-NNRTI-resistance mutation. Regarding mutations in the HIV-1 RT C-terminal region, including the connection subdomain and RNase H domain, their clinical impacts are still controversial, although their effects on NRTI and NNRTI resistance have been confirmed in vitro. In HIV-2 infections, the high prevalence of the Q151M mutation associated with multi-NRTI resistance has been frequently observed.

Genotypic impact of prolonged detectable HIV type 1 RNA viral load after HAART failure in a CRF01_AE-infected cohort

HIV subtype-specific data on mutation type, rate, and accumulation following HAART treatment failure are limited. We studied patterns and accrual of drug resistance mutations in a Cambodian CRF01_AE-infected cohort continuing a virologically failing first-line, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor- (NNRTI-) based, HAART. Between 2005 and 2007, 837 adult HIV-infected patients had regular plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load measurements at Sihanouk Hospital Centre of Hope (SHCH), Cambodia. Drug resistance testing was performed in all patients with HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/ml after at least 6 months of HAART. Seventy-one patients with a mean age of 34 years, of whom 68% were male, were retrospectively assessed at virological failure. The median duration of antiretroviral therapy was 12.3 (IQR 7.1-18.23) months, the median CD4 cell count was 173 (IQR 118-256) cells/mm(3), and the mean plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load was 3.9 log (SD 0.72) at failure. NNRTI mutations, M184I/V mutation, thymidine analogue mutations, and K65R were observed in 78.9%, 69%, 20%, and 12.7% of patients, respectively. For 33 patients, genotypic testing was carried out on at least two occasions before the switch to second-line HAART after a median duration of 5.8 (IQR 4.3-6.1) months of virological failure: 54.5% of patients accumulated new mutations with a rate of 1.6 mutations per person-year. Accumulation was seen both for nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and also in patients with low-level viremia. Subtype-specific data on mutation type, rate, and accumulation after HAART failure are urgently needed to optimize treatment strategies in resource-limited settings.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of fatty acyl ester derivatives of 2',3'-didehydro-2',3'-dideoxythymidine

A number of 5'-O-fatty acyl derivatives of 2',3'-didehydro-2',3'-dideoxythymidine (stavudine, d4T) were synthesized and evaluated for anti-HIV activities against cell-free and cell-associated virus, cellular cytotoxicity, and cellular uptake studies. The conjugates were found to be more potent than d4T. Among these conjugates, 5'-O-12-azidododecanoyl derivative of d4T (2), displaying EC(50) = 3.1-22.4 μM, showed 4- to 9-fold higher activities than d4T against cell-free and cell-associated virus. Cellular uptake studies were conducted on CCRF-CEM cell line using 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein derivatives of d4T attached through β-alanine (9) or 12-aminododecanoic acid (10) as linkers. The fluorescein-substituted analog of d4T with long chain length (10) showed 12- to 15-fold higher cellular uptake profile than the corresponding analog with short chain length (9). These studies reveal that conjugation of fatty acids to d4T enhances the cellular uptake and anti-HIV activity of stavudine.

Clinical and genotypic findings in HIV-infected patients with the K65R mutation failing first-line antiretroviral therapy in Nigeria

INTRODUCTION

The HIV-1 epidemic in African countries is largely due to non-B HIV-1 subtypes. Patterns and frequency of antiretroviral drug resistance mutations observed in these countries may differ from those in the developed world, where HIV-1 subtype B predominates.

METHODS

HIV-1 subtype and drug resistance mutations were assayed among Nigerian patients with treatment failure on first-line therapy (plasma HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL). Sequence analysis of the reverse transcriptase and protease gene revealed drug resistance mutations and HIV-1 viral subtype. Specific patterns of mutations and clinical characteristics are described in patients with the K65R mutation.

RESULTS

Since 2005, 338 patients were evaluated. The most prevalent subtypes were CRF02_AG [152 of 338 (44.9%)] and G [128 of 338 (37.9%)]. Three hundred seven of 338 (90.8%) patients had previously received stavudine and/or zidovudine + lamivudine + efavirenz or nevirapine; 41 of 338 (12.1%) had received tenofovir (TDF). The most common nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations observed were M184V (301, 89.1%) and K70R (91, 26.9%). The K65R mutation was present in 37 of 338 patients (10.9%). The Q151M (P < 0.05), K219R, and T69del (P < 0.01) mutations were more common in patients with K65R who had not received TDF.

CONCLUSIONS

The K65R mutation is increasingly recognized and is a challenging finding among patients with non-B HIV subtypes, whether or not they have been exposed to TDF.

The Role of Nucleotide Excision by Reverse Transcriptase in HIV Drug Resistance

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors of HIV block viral replication through the ability of HIV RT to incorporate chain-terminating nucleotide analogs during viral DNA synthesis. Once incorporated, the chain-terminating residue must be removed before DNA synthesis can continue. Removal can be accomplished by the excision activity of HIV RT, which catalyzes the transfer of the 3'-terminal residue on the blocked DNA chain to an acceptor substrate, probably ATP in most infected cells. Mutations of RT that enhance excision activity are the most common cause of resistance to 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (AZT) and exhibit low-level cross-resistance to most other nucleoside RT inhibitors. The resistance to AZT is suppressed by a number of additional mutations in RT, most of which were identified because they conferred resistance to other RT inhibitors. Here we review current understanding of the biochemical mechanisms responsible for increased or decreased excision activity due to these mutations.

Low-abundance HIV species and their impact on mutational profiles in patients with virological failure on once-daily abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine and tenofovir

Background

HIV clonal genotypic analysis (CG) was used to investigate whether a more sensitive analysis method would detect additional low-abundance mutations compared with population genotyping (PG) in antiretroviral-naive patients who experienced virological failure (VF) during treatment with abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine and tenofovir.

Methods

HIV was analysed by PG and CG (771 baseline and 657 VF clones) from subjects with VF (confirmed HIV RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL at 24–48 weeks).

Results

Fourteen of 123 subjects (11%) met VF criteria; their median baseline HIV RNA was 5.4 log₁₀ copies/mL, and 4.0 log₁₀ copies/mL at VF. By baseline PG, 2/14 had HIV-1 with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) or non-NRTI mutations. By baseline CG, 9/14 had HIV-1 with NNRTI and/or NRTI mutations; 7/9 had study drug-associated mutations. By PG at VF, 10/14 had selected for resistance mutations [2, K65R; 1, M184V; and 7, thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) ± M184V]. By CG at VF, for subjects with TAMs, T215F was more commonly detected (5/14 samples) than T215Y (2/14). For one subject who selected K65R at VF, both K65R-containing clones and TAM-containing clones (both T215A and T215F) were observed independently but not conjunctively in the same clone in a post-VF sample.

Conclusions

The majority of subjects with VF had major and minor mutations detected at VF; CG detected additional low-abundance variants at baseline and VF that could have influenced mutation selection pathways. Both PG and CG data suggest TAMs, not K65R selection, are the preferred resistance route, biased towards 215F selection. No HIV clone contained both K65R and T215F/Y mutations, suggesting in vivo antagonism between the two mutations. The once-daily zidovudine usage and high baseline viraemia may also have contributed to rapid selection of HIV with multiple mutations in VFs.

Risk of extended viral resistance in human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected Mozambican children after first-line treatment failure

BACKGROUND

Resistant virus may be selected by sub-optimal control of HIV-1 replication during antiretroviral treatment. The incidence and profile of resistance in children receiving World Health Organization-recommended treatment remains to be evaluated on a large scale.

GOALS

Assessment of the frequency and profile of resistant virus in HIV-1-infected children, treated for at least 6 months with stavudine/zidovudine + lamivudine + nevirapine and presenting virological failure in a large access program in Maputo, Mozambique.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional evaluation of plasma HIV-1 viral load (VL) in 495 evaluable children among 512 treated for at least 6 months showed that 360 (72.7%) had a VL of <50 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA. Genotypic resistance tests were performed in the 84 available samples from the 135 treated children with VL > or = 50 copies/mL: 92% of the viruses were resistant to lamivudine and/or nevirapine, and 15% were resistant to stavudine. Twenty children (24%) harbored virus with a extended spectrum of cross-resistance defined as resistance to the 3 drugs of the combination received by the child and/or at least 1 resistance to a drug to which the child had never been exposed (abacavir: 5%, tenofovir: 6%, didanosine: 3.5% and the new generation non nucleoside inhibitor, etravirine: 6%). The only factor identified by multivariate analysis as being associated with this extended resistance profile was the duration of treatment (aOR: 6.67 [95% CI: 1.24-35.93], P = 0.015 for treatment >24 months) with a per month increase of 1.09 (1.02-1.16) P = 0.007.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual viral replication in children receiving stavudine/zidovudine + lamivudine + nevirapine treatment is associated with a time-dependent risk of acquiring cross-resistance, including resistance to drugs currently used for second-line treatment and also to the new generation of non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Clinical management of HIV-1 resistance

Antiretroviral drug resistance is a fundamental survival strategy for the virus that stems from its vast capacity to generate diversity. With the recent availability of new ARV drugs and classes, it is now possible to prescribe fully active ART to most HIV-infected subjects and achieve viral suppression even in those with multidrug-resistant HIV. It is uncertain, however, if this scenario will endure. Given that ART must be given for life, and new compounds other than second-generation integrase inhibitors may not reach the clinic soon, all efforts must be done to avoid the development of resistance to the new agents. Here, we discuss relevant aspects for the clinical management of antiretroviral drug resistance, leaving detailed explanations of mechanisms and mutation patterns to other articles in this issue. This article forms part of a special issue of Antiviral Research marking the 25th anniversary of antiretroviral drug discovery and development, vol. 85, issue 1, 2010.

The public health approach to identify antiretroviral therapy failure: high-level nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance among Malawians failing first-line antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Over 150,000 Malawians have started antiretroviral therapy (ART), in which first-line therapy is stavudine/lamivudine/nevirapine. We evaluated drug resistance patterns among patients failing first-line ART on the basis of clinical or immunological criteria in Lilongwe and Blantyre, Malawi.

METHODS

Patients meeting the definition of ART failure (new or progressive stage 4 condition, CD4 cell count decline more than 30%, CD4 cell count less than that before treatment) from January 2006 to July 2007 were evaluated. Among those with HIV RNA of more than 1000 copies/ml, genotyping was performed. For complex genotype patterns, phenotyping was performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six confirmed ART failure patients were identified. Median (interquartile range) CD4 cell count, log10 HIV-1 RNA, and duration on ART were 68 cells/microl (23-174), 4.72 copies/ml (4.26-5.16), and 36.5 months (26.6-49.8), respectively. Ninety-three percent of samples had nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations, and 81% had the M184V mutation. The most frequent pattern included M184V and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations along with at least one thymidine analog mutation (56%). Twenty-three percent of patients acquired the K70E or K65R mutations associated with tenofovir resistance; 17% of the patients had pan-nucleoside resistance that corresponded to K65R or K70E and additional resistance mutations, most commonly the 151 complex. Emergence of the K65R and K70E mutations was associated with CD4 cell count of less than 100 cells/microl (odds ratio 6.1) and inversely with the use of zidovudine (odds ratio 0.18). Phenotypic susceptibility data indicated that the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone with the highest activity for subsequent therapy was zidovudine/lamivudine/tenofovir, followed by lamivudine/tenofovir, and then abacavir/didanosine.

CONCLUSION

When clinical and CD4 cell count criteria are used to monitor first-line ART failure, extensive nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance emerges, with most patients having resistance profiles that markedly compromise the activity of second-line ART.

Apricitabine does not select additional drug resistance mutations in tissue culture in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants containing K65R, M184V, or M184V plus thymidine analogue mutations

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 containing the reverse transcriptase mutation M184V or K65R or mutations M41L, M184V, and T215Y did not accumulate additional resistance mutations in the reverse transcriptase when increasing amounts of apricitabine drug pressure were applied. The original mutations were maintained by the presence of apricitabine but were lost when cultured without drug pressure.

HIV type 1 subtype C drug resistance among pediatric and adult South African patients failing antiretroviral therapy

The emergence of HIV drug resistance is a major obstacle to effective antiretroviral (ARV) treatments. This study examined the drug resistance profiles among South African patients virologically failing ARV therapies between 2000 and 2003, prior to the introduction of a national treatment program. Samples were obtained from 65 HIV-1 subtype C-infected patients (39 children and 26 adults) who had received at least two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and either a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI). Resistance assays were performed using the HIV-1 ViroSeq Genotyping System and mutations were defined according to the Stanford Sequence Resistance Database. Ninety-one percent of patients harbored resistance mutations; the most frequent NRTI mutations were M184V/I (37%), D67N (32%), T215Y/F (25%), K70R (21%), M41L (20%), K219Q/E (14%), and K65R (14%), reflecting the frequent use of lamuvidine and zidovudine. K103N (25%), V106M (20%), and G190A (17%) were found among patients failing nevirapine- or efavirenz-containing regimens. Of the patients who received PIs, the most common mutations were V82A/T (12%), M46I (11%), and L90M (8%). Mutations were similar among adults and children. These data indicate that HIV-1 drug resistance develops in South African subtype C-infected patients failing ARV therapy with mutations comparable to those found among patients infected with subtype B viruses.

The A62V and S68G mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase partially restore the replication defect associated with the K65R mutation

BACKGROUND

The K65R mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase can be selected by abacavir, didanosine, tenofovir, and stavudine in vivo resulting in reduced susceptibility to these drugs and decreased viral replication capacity. In clinical isolates, K65R is frequently accompanied by the A62V and S68G reverse transcriptase mutations.

METHODS

The role of A62V and S68G in combination with K65R was investigated using phenotypic, viral growth competition, pre-steady-state kinetic, and excision analyses.

RESULTS

Addition of A62V and S68G to K65R caused no significant change in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to abacavir, didanosine, tenofovir, or stavudine but partially restored the replication defect of virus containing K65R. The triple mutant K65R+A62V+S68G still showed some replication defect compared with wild-type virus. Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis demonstrated that K65R resulted in a decreased rate of incorporation (kpol) for all natural dNTPs, which were partially restored to wild-type levels by addition of A62V and S68G. When added to K65R and S68G, the A62V mutation seemed to restore adenosine triphosphate-mediated excision of tenofovir to wild-type levels.

CONCLUSIONS

A62V and S68G serve as partial compensatory mutations for the K65R mutation in reverse transcriptase by improving the viral replication capacity, which is likely due to increased incorporation efficiency of the natural substrates.

An HIV-1 215V mutant shows increased phenotypic resistance to d4T

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viruses with C/S/D/E at 215 codon of the reverse transcriptase (RT) have been associated with the T215Y/F HIV-1 resistant viruses transmission to naïve patients. The uncommon T215V mutation was detected in DNA proviral samples of a treatment-naïve patient. Virus T215V was obtained after cloning the patient-RT into a molecular clone. Wild-type (T215) and resistant (T215F) clones, were obtained in T215V clone by "in vitro" site-directed mutagenesis. Phenotypic resistance against AZT, ddI and d4T, replication kinetics and the selection of resistance mutations were estimated "in vitro". The T215V virus replicated as efficiently as the wild-type (T215) without antivirals and in the presence of AZT or ddI. The T215V virus showed higher replicative capacity than the wild-type and a 4.3-fold increase in the IC(50) values in cultures with d4T. Selection of resistance mutations was not observed in viral quasispecies of the T215V virus after serial passages in culture in presence of increasing concentrations of AZT, ddI or d4T. This work demonstrates that the T215V mutation decreases the susceptibility of HIV-1 to d4T, and consequently, it could compromise the response to regimens containing this antiviral.

The balance between NRTI discrimination and excision drives the susceptibility of HIV-1 RT mutants K65R, M184V and K65r+M184V

The HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) resistance mutations K65R and M184V occur individually and in combination, and can contribute to decreased treatment responses in patients. In order to understand how these mutations interact with one another to confer drug resistance, the susceptibilities and underlying resistance mechanisms of these mutants to nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs) were determined. Virus carrying K65R have reduced susceptibility to most NRTIs, but retain full susceptibility to zidovudine (AZT). M184V mutants have reduced susceptibility to lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC) and didanosine (ddl), and contribute to reduced susceptibility to abacavir; however, they remain fully susceptible to tenofovir (TFV), AZT and stavudine (d4T). In cell culture, the K65R+M184V virus showed slightly increased susceptibility to TFV, AZT and d4T compared with K65R alone, but showed further decreases in susceptibility to 3TC, FTC, ddl and abacavir. There are two major biochemical mechanisms of resistance: altered NRTI binding/incorporation and altered NRTI excision after incorporation. For most NRTIs, the primary mechanism of resistance by K65R, M184V and K65R+M184V mutant RTs is to disrupt the NRTI-binding/incorporation steps. In the case of AZT, however, decreased binding/incorporation by K65R and K65R+M184V was counteracted by decreased AZT excision resulting in wild-type susceptibility. For TFV, decreased excision by K65R and K65R+M184V may partially counteract the K65R-driven decrease in incorporation relative to wild-type resulting in only low levels of TFV resistance. The K65R-mediated effect on decreasing NRTI excision was stronger than for M184V. These studies show that both mechanisms of resistance (binding/incorporation and excision) must be considered when defining resistance mechanisms.

Prevalence and risk factors for developing K65R mutations among HIV-1 infected patients who fail an initial regimen of fixed-dose combination of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine

BACKGROUND

A fixed-dose combination of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine (d4T/3TC/NVP) is extensively used as initial antiretroviral regimen in developing countries. K65R mutations that occur after failing this regimen prevent the use of tenofovir, didanosine, and abcavir in the second-line regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence and risk factors of K65R mutations after failing d4T/3TC/NVP.

STUDY DESIGN

Genotypic resistance testing was conducted among HIV-1 infected patients who experienced virological failure with an initial regimen of d4T/3TC/NVP.

RESULTS

There were 122 patients who received antiretroviral therapy (ART) for a median (IQR) duration of 19 (13-27) months. Median (IQR) CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA at virological failure was 174 (109-264) cells/mm(3) and 4.0 (3.7-4.6)log copies/mL, respectively. The prevalence of K65R mutations was 7%. Patients with K65R mutations had higher plasma HIV-1 RNA at virological failure compared to patients without K65R mutations (4.9log copies/mL vs. 4.0log copies/mL, p=0.001). By logistic regression analysis only plasma HIV-1 RNA at failure correlated with the occurrence of K65R mutations [OR 4.2 (95% CI, 1.5-11.2) per 0.5log copies/mL increment of HIV-1 RNA].

CONCLUSIONS

Seven percent of patients had K65R mutations after failing an initial d4T/3TC/NVP regimen. Tenofovir, didanosine, and abcavir cannot be used in second-line regimen for these patients. HIV-1 RNA at the time that virological failure was detected correlated with the occurrence of K65R mutations.

Antiretroviral therapy : optimal sequencing of therapy to avoid resistance

In the second decade of highly active antiretroviral therapy, drug regimens offer more potent, less toxic and more durable choices. However, strategies addressing convenient sequential use of active antiretroviral combinations are rarely presented in the literature. Studies have seldom directly addressed this issue, despite it being a matter of daily use in clinical practice. This is, in part, because of the complexity of HIV-1 resistance information as well as the complexity of designing these types of studies. Nevertheless, several principles can effectively assist the planning of antiretroviral drug sequencing. The introduction of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, abacavir and emtricitabine into current nucleoside backbone options, with each of them selecting for an individual pattern of resistance mutations, now permits sequencing in the context of previously popular thymidine analogues (zidovudine and stavudine). Similarly, newer ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors could potentially be sequenced in a manner that uses the least cross-resistance prone protease inhibitor at the start of therapy, while leaving the most cross-resistance prone drugs for later, as long as there is rationale to employ such a compound because of its utility against commonly observed drug-resistant forms of HIV-1.

Mechanisms of resistance to nucleoside analogue inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors can be classified into nucleoside and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. Nucleoside RT inhibitors are converted to active triphosphate analogues and incorporated into the DNA in RT-catalyzed reactions. They act as chain terminators blocking DNA synthesis, since they lack the 3'-OH group required for the phosphodiester bond formation. Unfortunately, available therapies do not completely suppress viral replication, and the emergence of drug-resistant HIV variants is facilitated by the high adaptation capacity of the virus. Mutations in the RT-coding region selected during treatment with nucleoside analogues confer resistance through different mechanisms: (i) altering discrimination between nucleoside RT inhibitors and natural substrates (dNTPs) (e.g. Q151M, M184V, etc.), or (ii) increasing the RT's phosphorolytic activity (e.g. M41L, T215Y and other thymidine analogue resistance mutations), which in the presence of a pyrophosphate donor (usually ATP) allow the removal of chain-terminating inhibitors from the 3' end of the primer. Both mechanisms are implicated in multi-drug resistance. The excision reaction can be modulated by mutations conferring resistance to nucleoside or nonnucleoside RT inhibitors, and by amino acid substitutions that interfere with the proper binding of the template-primer, including mutations that affect RNase H activity. New developments in the field should contribute towards improving the efficacy of current therapies.

Low-level K65R mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase of treatment-experienced patients exposed to abacavir or didanosine

BACKGROUND

Prior abacavir (ABC) or didanosine (ddI) therapy can result in the L74V/I or K65R mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Preexisting K65R may have an impact on the treatment response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

METHODS

An allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) assay was developed to detect K65R with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.5%.

RESULTS

Among baseline plasma samples from 63 treatment-naive patients, no K65R was detected by AS-PCR. Among baseline samples from 154 treatment-experienced patients, 8 had K65R and 44 had L74V/I by population sequencing. Low-level K65R was detected in an additional 11 patients by AS-PCR, 3 of whom subsequently developed full K65R. Baseline K65R correlated with absence of thymidine analog mutations (TAMs; P = 0.003) and use of ABC or ddI (P = 0.004). Patients with full or low-level K65R at baseline or with L74V/I showed a diminished TDF response. Multivariate analyses confirmed that multiple TAMs, K65R, and L74V/I were independent predictors of diminished TDF response.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior therapy with ABC or ddI can result in a population genotype that shows K65R or L74V/I but does not reveal low-level K65R present in some patients. Subsequent treatment intensification with TDF resulted in a poor virologic response and may result in expansion of the preexisting K65R mutant.

Virological response to Salvage Therapy in HIV-Infected Persons Carrying the Reverse Transcriptase K65R Mutation

Background

The effect of the HIV reverse transcriptase K65R mutation on virological response to salvage therapy has not been clearly defined.

Methods

From six Italian clinical centres, all consecutive patients starting salvage antiretroviral therapy after virological failure in the presence of the K65R mutation identified by a genotypic resistance test were selected.

Results

Among 145 subjects included over a 197 person-year follow-up, the estimated probability of virological response (VR, defined as reaching HIV RNA <50 copies/ml after salvage therapy) at 24 and 48 weeks was 36% and 60%, respectively. The strongest independent predictor of VR was the inclusion of a thymidine analogue (TA) in the salvage regimen. The presence of M184V and the introduction of lopinavir/ritonavir as new drug were both marginally associated with better outcome. After 24 weeks of salvage therapy, the median reduction in HIV-1 RNA was -1.36 log10 copies/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 0.10–2.46): at multivariable regression analysis, salvage regimens containing a TA (β=+0.80; P=0.02) and lamivudine (β=+1.21; P=0.02) as new drug had a positive effect on the reduction of HIV-1 RNA.

Conclusions

Development of the K65R mutation does not preclude a high rate of virological response to rescue therapy. Inclusion of a TA in the salvage regimen and the presence of a M184V mutation could have a favourable effect on virological outcome.

Strategies for the optimal sequencing of antiretroviral drugs toward overcoming and preventing drug resistance

Drug regimens now offer more potent, less toxic and more durable choices in the treatment of HIV disease than ever before. This has led to a need to consider the convenient, sequential use of active antiretroviral combinations. Ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) can now be potentially sequenced in a manner that uses the least cross-resistance-prone PI at the start of therapy while leaving the most cross-resistance-prone drug for later, if the latter retains activity against commonly observed drug-resistant forms. Similarly, such new drugs as tenofovir, abacavir and emtricitabine, which make up current nucleoside backbone options, can be potentially sequenced, since each of them selects for an individual pattern of resistance mutations that are generally distinct from those selected by previously popular thymidine analogs such as zidovudine and stavudine.

Baseline genotype as a predictor of virological failure to emtricitabine or stavudine in combination with didanosine and efavirenz

The presence of drug-associated mutations among ART-naive, HIV-1(+) patients may compromise the response to antiviral therapy. We evaluated the effect of preexisting drug-associated resistance mutations to the response in treatment-naive patients to therapy with emtricitabine (FTC) or stavudine (d4T) in combination with didanosine (ddI) and efavirenz (EFV). Study FTC-301A compared emtricitabine once daily (QD) with stavudine twice daily in combination with didanosine and efavirenz in ART-naive patients. Genotypic analysis was performed on baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA for all available samples and at time of virologic failure (VF). Drug resistance mutations present at baseline were evaluated as predictors of VF using logistic regression. VF rates were compared between subgroups using a two-sided exact test. Baseline drug resistance mutations were observed in 90/546 (16.5%) patients: 56/90 (62.2%) with nonnucleoside analogue (NNRTI) mutations and 42/90 (46.6%) with nucleoside analogue mutations. In a stepwise, multiple regression analysis, the presence of the K103N mutation at initiation of therapy was associated with VF in both arms (p = 0.001), however, there was a higher incidence of VF in the stavudine arm compared to the emtricitabine arm regardless of the presence or absence of mutations at baseline (p = 0.001). In this study, the presence of drug-associated resistance mutations in ART-naive patients was significantly correlated with subsequent development of virologic failure underscoring the utility of testing for resistance in addition to the use of potent and well-tolerated first line regimens in treatment-naive patients.

Mechanism of action of (-)-(2R,4R)-1-(2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl) thymine as an anti-HIV agent

(-)-(2R,4R)-1-(2-Hydroxymethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4yl)thymine (DOT) is a thymidine analogue that has potent in vitro activity against wild-type and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-resistant HIV. For nucleoside analogues to inhibit viral replication, they must be metabolized to the active triphosphate, which inhibits the viral reverse transcriptase (RT). Using purified enzymes, the kinetics of DOT phosphorylation, inhibition of wild-type and drug-resistant HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activity, and excision of DOT-5'-monophosphate (DOT-MP) from a chain-terminated primer were examined. DOT was phosphorylated by human thymidine kinase-1 (TK-1) but not by other pyrimidine nucleoside kinases, including the mitochondrial thymidine kinase (TK-2). Resistance to NRTIs involves decreased binding/incorporation and/or increased excision of the chain-terminating NRTI. RTs containing the D67N/K70R/T215Y/K219Q or T695-SS/T215Y mutations show enhanced removal of DOT-MP from terminated primer as well as approximately four-fold decreased binding/incorporation. The Q151M and K65R mutations appear to cause decreased inhibition by DOT-TP. However, both the K65R and Q151M mutations show decreased excision, which would confer greater stability on the terminated primer. These opposing mechanisms could offset the overall resistance profile and susceptibility. Little or no resistance was observed with the enzymes harbouring mutations resistant to lamivudine (M184V) and non-nucleoside RT inhibitors (K103N).

Resistance development over 144 weeks in treatment-naive patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or stavudine with lamivudine and efavirenz in Study 903

OBJECTIVE

Study 903 was a 144-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Patients received either TDF (n = 299) or stavudine (d4T) (n = 301) with lamivudine (3TC) and efavirenz (EFV). Resistance analyses were performed at baseline and at virological failure to determine the effects of baseline resistance and the patterns of resistance at virological failure.

METHODS

Plasma HIV-1 from patients at baseline and at virological failure (>400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 144 or early discontinuation) was analysed phenotypically and by population sequencing.

RESULTS

Sixteen per cent of patients were classified as having virological failure (47 on TDF and 49 on d4T; P = 0.91). Patients with non-B HIV-1 subtypes or baseline nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-associated mutations responded similarly to the overall population. Resistance to EFV (K103N and others) or 3TC (M184V) developed most frequently (8.3% and 5.8%, respectively) and similarly in the two arms. In the d4T arm, a variety of NRTI mutations developed: K65R (n = 2), L74V (n = 2), V75M (n = 1), and T69A + Y115H (n = 1). K65R developed in eight TDF patients (2.7%); in seven of these eight patients, within 48 weeks. All eight patients began new regimens with a protease inhibitor (PI) and NRTIs, including two patients who remained on TDF; five of the eight patients achieved HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in second-line therapy with the remaining patients having no follow-up or being nonadherent.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of HIV-1 with TDF, 3TC and EFV was highly effective, with <3% of patients developing resistance to TDF over 144 weeks.

Tenofovir and abacavir combination therapy: lessons learned from an urban clinic population

Regimens containing abacavir (ABC), tenofovir (TDF), and lamivudine (3TC) have recently been demonstrated to have high failure rates. This poses a clinical dilemma of how to manage patients currently being treated with other regimens containing tenofovir/abacavir. We evaluated the outcomes of tenofovir/abacavir regimens in our clinical practice through a retrospective review of 2655 charts. Two hundred patients (7%) were on a tenofovir/abacavir-containing regimen. Fifty-nine patients met the criteria for analysis and were grouped into three groups: (1) antiretroviral naïve, (2) virally suppressed patients switched to TDF/ABC, and (3) patients with failure of their first antiretroviral regimen. Rates of viral suppression in the naïve, switch, and first-failure groups were 95%, 86%, and 46%, respectively. In the first-failure group, viral suppression was 66% without and 18% with a preexisting M184V. A composite analysis of the groups revealed a success rate of 86% when the regimen contained zidovudine (ZDV) and 62% when it did not. No K65R mutations were noted. These findings support continued caution in the use of TDF/ABC in combination. However, these data suggest that this combination may be successfully used in selected situations such as in combination with ZDV. In patients already virally suppressed on a TDF/ABC-containing regimen, considerations include continuing the regimen or adding zidovudine, in the attempt to protect against the development of a K65R mutation and/or virologic failure, versus changing a stable regimen.

Polymorphism and drug selected mutations of reverse transcriptase gene in 102 HIV-1 infected patients living in China

Few data are available for genotypic patterns within human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) in drug-naive patients and RT inhibitor (RTI) treated patients in China. This study aimed at characterizing the polymorphism of RT HIV-1 in the absence of drug treatment and to identify known and unknown mutations emerging under RTI selective pressure. The HIV-1 RT gene from 21 drug-naive patients and 81 RTI treated patients from three provinces in China was analyzed. Most patients (>80%) received a triple regimen including stavudine (d4T) plus didanosine (ddI) and nevirapine (NVP), or d4T plus lamivudine (3TC) and efavirenz (EFV), or zidovudine (AZT) +ddI + NVP. In untreated patients, four highly polymorphic positions were found (122, 200, 207, and 211). In treated patients, two patterns of resistance associated mutations (RAMs) were observed: (1) K65R (9.8%), L74V (7.4%), M184V (7.4%), Q151M (5%), and thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) (9.3%) including T215Y (5.5%), in patients who underwent ddI + d4T + NVP. (2) T215Y (23%), M184V (20%), and TAMs (15.4%) in patients receiving d4T + 3TC + EFV. In all cases, a high prevalence of non-nucleoside RTIs (NNRTI) RAMs (41.9%) was found. Four RTI suspected new RAMs were described at position 142, 221, 224, and 228. An association between H221Y and L228H/R with Y181C was noted. These data highlight the predominant spread of NNRTI RAM in China, depict the specific genotypic pattern of RTI selected mutations in China, and suggest the association of newly described mutations with RTI therapy.

The fitness cost of mutations associated with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance is modulated by mutational interactions

It is generally accepted that the fitness cost of resistance mutations plays a role in the persistence of transmitted drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and that mutations that confer a high fitness cost are less able to persist in the absence of drug pressure. Here, we show that the fitness cost of reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations can vary within a 72-fold range. We also demonstrate that the fitness cost of M184V and K70R can be decreased or enhanced by other resistance mutations such as D67N and K219Q. We conclude that the persistence of transmitted RT mutants might range widely on the basis of fitness and that the modulation of fitness cost by mutational interactions will be a critical determinant of persistence.

High prevalence of the K65R mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C isolates from infected patients in Botswana treated with didanosine-based regimens

We analyzed the reverse transcriptase genotypes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C viruses isolated from 23 patients in Botswana treated with didanosine-based regimens. The K65R mutation was selected either alone or together with the Q151M, S68G, or F116Y substitution in viruses from seven such individuals. The results of in vitro passage experiments were consistent with an apparent increased propensity of subtype C viruses to develop the K65R substitution.

MultiCode-RTx real-time PCR system for detection of subpopulations of K65R human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase mutant viruses in clinical samples

We report a real-time PCR assay capable of detecting drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase K65R mutant virus at a level of 0.5% in polymorphic patient plasma specimens. Fifty-three treatment-naïve and 20 treatment-experienced specimens were successfully genotyped with the new method. Results were in agreement with population sequencing and the labor-intensive single-genome sequencing method.

The K65R reverse transcriptase mutation in HIV-1 reverses the excision phenotype of zidovudine resistance mutations

The HIV-1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) tenofovir (TFV), abacavir, didanosine and stavudine can select for K65R, whereas zidovudine (AZT) and stavudine can select for thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs) in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). HIV-1 with TAMs shows reduced susceptibility to all NRTIs, most notably AZT, whereas HIV-1 with K65R shows reduced susceptibility to all NRTIs except AZT. K65R and TAMs rarely occur together in patients. However, when present together, K65R can restore susceptibility to AZT. This study characterizes the underlying mechanisms of resistance of these RT mutants to TFV and AZT. K65R mediated decreased binding/incorporation of TFV and AZT (increased Ki/Km of 7.1- and 4.3-fold, respectively), but also decreased excision of TFV and AZT (0.7- and 0.3-fold, respectively) when compared with wild-type RT. By contrast, TAMs mediated increased TFV and AZT excision (11- and 5.4-fold, respectively), and showed no changes in binding/incorporation. When these mutations were combined, K65R reversed TAM-mediated AZT resistance by strongly reducing AZT excision. Molecular modelling studies suggest that K65R creates additional hydrogen bonds that reduce the conformational mobility of RT, resulting in reduced polymerization and excision. Thus, consistent with clinical HIV-1 genotyping data, there appears to be no net NRTI resistance benefit for TAMs and K65R to develop together in patients taking AZT and TFV disoproxil fumarate, where the TAM pathway alone provides the greatest resistance for both drugs.

Significance of the L74V mutation in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

Mutations that confer resistance to nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors of HIV-1 can be divided into two major classes: thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) and TAM suppressors. M184V, K65R and L74V are TAM suppressors that emerge under the selective pressure of non-thymidine analogs. Each of the three TAM suppressors have been shown to decrease the level of resistance to 3´-azido-3´-deoxythymidine against a background of certain combinations of TAMs. L74V and M184V have also been associated with decreased phenotypic susceptibility to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in vitro. In this review, the effects associated with the L74V mutation, which confer resistance to didanosine and abacavir, are discussed. The clinical significance of this mutation and the underlying biochemical mechanisms of inhibition, resistance and resensitization are also discussed in the context of drug regimens containing didanosine and/or abacavir, in combination with 3´-azido -3´-deoxythymidine and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

The K65R mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase exhibits bidirectional phenotypic antagonism with thymidine analog mutations

The K65R mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) is selected in vitro by many D-nucleoside analog RT inhibitors (NRTI) but has been rarely detected in treated patients. In recent clinical trials, the K65R mutation has emerged frequently in patients experiencing virologic failure on antiretroviral combinations that do not include 3'-azidothymidine (AZT). The reason for this change is uncertain. To gain insight, we examined trends in the frequency of K65R in a large genotype database, the association of K65R with thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) and other NRTI mutations, and the viral susceptibility profile of HIV-1 with K65R alone and in combination with TAMs. Among >60,000 clinical samples submitted for genotype analysis that contained one or more NRTI resistance mutations, the frequency of K65R increased from 0.4% in 1998 to 3.6% in 2003. Among samples with K65R, a strong negative association was evident with the TAMs M41L, D67N, L210W, T215Y/F, and K219Q/E (P<0.005) but not with other NRTI mutations, including the Q151M complex. This suggested that K65R and TAMs are antagonistic. To test this possibility, we generated recombinant HIV-1 encoding K65R in two different TAM backgrounds: M41L/L210W/T215Y and D67N/K70R/T215F/K219Q. K65R reduced AZT resistance from >50-fold to <2.5-fold in both backgrounds. In addition, TAMs antagonized the phenotypic effect of K65R, reducing resistance to tenofovir, abacavir, 2',3'-dideoxycytidine, dideoxyinosine, and stavudine. In conclusion, K65R and TAMs exhibit bidirectional phenotypic antagonism. This antagonism likely explains the negative association of these mutations in genotype databases, the rare emergence of K65R with antiretroviral therapies that contain AZT, and its more frequent emergence with combinations that exclude AZT.

Clinical and genotypic correlates of mutation K65R in HIV-infected patients failing regimens not including tenofovir

The mutation RT-K65R confers resistance to tenofovir (TDF). Although its prevalence is increasing with the use of this drug, clinical and genotypic correlates of K65R occurrence have yet to be fully identified. Clinical, virological and immunological and genotypic data of patients naïve for TDF who failed HAART regimens and underwent genotypic resistance test (GRT) during 1999-2003 were collected in a database and analyzed retrospectively. Out of 1392 GRT performed for 771 patients, 12 TDF-naïve patients had the K65R mutation with an overall prevalence of 1.6%. Previous AIDS, the use of abacavir, and treatment with efavirenz at GRT were independently associated with a greater risk of expressing K65R, while patients with longer exposure to lamivudine were less likely to present the mutation. Among genotypic correlates, the presence of M184V and NAMs seems to be protective for the emergence of K65R, while a strong positive correlation was found with the Q151M complex mutation. Moreover, the L100I mutation was independently associated with a higher probability of presenting K65R. The selection of mutation K65R in patients failing without TDF is rare. However, exposure to abacavir and/or efavirenz, presence of Q151M and/or L100I, and prior AIDS may favor the selection of this mutation. Conversely, long 3TC exposure, and the presence of M184V or NAMs seem to be protective.

Prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance mutations and HIV-1 non-B subtypes in newly diagnosed drug-naïve patients in Slovenia, 2000–2004

In order to estimate the prevalence and patterns of antiretroviral drug resistance mutations in drug-naïve HIV-1 infected patients in Slovenia, and the prevalence of non-B subtypes, a retrospective study was conducted on a cohort, representing 87% of the total of newly diagnosed HIV-1 infected patients, in a 5 year period (2000-2004). Protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences were determined in 77 newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients. Non-B subtypes were present in 18% of the population tested. Transmitted drug resistance was identified as in the CATCH study: the presence of primary PR and RT gene mutations according to the IAS-USA mutation list including the revertant mutations in codon 215 and excluding mutations on the RT positions 44 and 118. The estimated prevalence of transmitted resistance mutations was 3.9%. Namely, three out of 77 patients had mutations associated with resistance to NRTIs: one patient carried M184V in association with A62V, while a revertant mutation T215D was found in two patients. No transmitted drug resistance to NNRTIs or PIs was detected. However, to score the expected response to therapy using the REGA and the Stanford algorithms, we also took into account secondary PR mutations and additional RT mutations. Reduced response to some therapeutic options was predicted in five patients (6.5%). In conclusion, testing the vast majority of all newly diagnosed HIV-1 patients in the last 5 years in Slovenia uncovered a relatively high prevalence of non-B subtypes and a low prevalence of transmitted drug resistance.