1
|
Dittmer J. Biological effects and regulation of IGFBP5 in breast cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:983793. [PMID: 36093095 PMCID: PMC9453429 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.983793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) pathway plays an important role in cancer progression. In breast cancer, the IGF1R pathway is linked to estrogen-dependent signaling. Regulation of IGF1R activity is complex and involves the actions of its ligands IGF1 and IGF2 and those of IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). Six IGFBPs are known that share the ability to form complexes with the IGFs, by which they control the bioavailability of these ligands. Besides, each of the IGFBPs have specific features. In this review, the focus lies on the biological effects and regulation of IGFBP5 in breast cancer. In breast cancer, estrogen is a critical regulator of IGFBP5 transcription. It exerts its effect through an intergenic enhancer loop that is part of the chromosomal breast cancer susceptibility region 2q35. The biological effects of IGFBP5 depend upon the cellular context. By inhibiting or promoting IGF1R signaling, IGFBP5 can either act as a tumor suppressor or promoter. Additionally, IGFBP5 possesses IGF-independent activities, which contribute to the complexity by which IGFBP5 interferes with cancer cell behavior.
Collapse
|
2
|
Helm JS, Rudel RA. Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast. Arch Toxicol 2020. [PMID: 32399610 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02752-z)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
Knowledge about established breast carcinogens can support improved and modernized toxicological testing methods by identifying key mechanistic events. Ionizing radiation (IR) increases the risk of breast cancer, especially for women and for exposure at younger ages, and evidence overall supports a linear dose-response relationship. We used the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework to outline and evaluate the evidence linking ionizing radiation with breast cancer from molecular initiating events to the adverse outcome through intermediate key events, creating a qualitative AOP. We identified key events based on review articles, searched PubMed for recent literature on key events and IR, and identified additional papers using references. We manually curated publications and evaluated data quality. Ionizing radiation directly and indirectly causes DNA damage and increases production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). RONS lead to DNA damage and epigenetic changes leading to mutations and genomic instability (GI). Proliferation amplifies the effects of DNA damage and mutations leading to the AO of breast cancer. Separately, RONS and DNA damage also increase inflammation. Inflammation contributes to direct and indirect effects (effects in cells not directly reached by IR) via positive feedback to RONS and DNA damage, and separately increases proliferation and breast cancer through pro-carcinogenic effects on cells and tissue. For example, gene expression changes alter inflammatory mediators, resulting in improved survival and growth of cancer cells and a more hospitable tissue environment. All of these events overlap at multiple points with events characteristic of "background" induction of breast carcinogenesis, including hormone-responsive proliferation, oxidative activity, and DNA damage. These overlaps make the breast particularly susceptible to ionizing radiation and reinforce that these biological activities are important characteristics of carcinogens. Agents that increase these biological processes should be considered potential breast carcinogens, and predictive methods are needed to identify chemicals that increase these processes. Techniques are available to measure RONS, DNA damage and mutation, cell proliferation, and some inflammatory proteins or processes. Improved assays are needed to measure GI and chronic inflammation, as well as the interaction with hormonally driven development and proliferation. Several methods measure diverse epigenetic changes, but it is not clear which changes are relevant to breast cancer. In addition, most toxicological assays are not conducted in mammary tissue, and so it is a priority to evaluate if results from other tissues are generalizable to breast, or to conduct assays in breast tissue. Developing and applying these assays to identify exposures of concern will facilitate efforts to reduce subsequent breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica S Helm
- Silent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, Suite 302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA
| | - Ruthann A Rudel
- Silent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, Suite 302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Helm JS, Rudel RA. Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast. Arch Toxicol 2020; 94:1511-1549. [PMID: 32399610 PMCID: PMC7261741 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02752-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Knowledge about established breast carcinogens can support improved and modernized toxicological testing methods by identifying key mechanistic events. Ionizing radiation (IR) increases the risk of breast cancer, especially for women and for exposure at younger ages, and evidence overall supports a linear dose-response relationship. We used the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework to outline and evaluate the evidence linking ionizing radiation with breast cancer from molecular initiating events to the adverse outcome through intermediate key events, creating a qualitative AOP. We identified key events based on review articles, searched PubMed for recent literature on key events and IR, and identified additional papers using references. We manually curated publications and evaluated data quality. Ionizing radiation directly and indirectly causes DNA damage and increases production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). RONS lead to DNA damage and epigenetic changes leading to mutations and genomic instability (GI). Proliferation amplifies the effects of DNA damage and mutations leading to the AO of breast cancer. Separately, RONS and DNA damage also increase inflammation. Inflammation contributes to direct and indirect effects (effects in cells not directly reached by IR) via positive feedback to RONS and DNA damage, and separately increases proliferation and breast cancer through pro-carcinogenic effects on cells and tissue. For example, gene expression changes alter inflammatory mediators, resulting in improved survival and growth of cancer cells and a more hospitable tissue environment. All of these events overlap at multiple points with events characteristic of "background" induction of breast carcinogenesis, including hormone-responsive proliferation, oxidative activity, and DNA damage. These overlaps make the breast particularly susceptible to ionizing radiation and reinforce that these biological activities are important characteristics of carcinogens. Agents that increase these biological processes should be considered potential breast carcinogens, and predictive methods are needed to identify chemicals that increase these processes. Techniques are available to measure RONS, DNA damage and mutation, cell proliferation, and some inflammatory proteins or processes. Improved assays are needed to measure GI and chronic inflammation, as well as the interaction with hormonally driven development and proliferation. Several methods measure diverse epigenetic changes, but it is not clear which changes are relevant to breast cancer. In addition, most toxicological assays are not conducted in mammary tissue, and so it is a priority to evaluate if results from other tissues are generalizable to breast, or to conduct assays in breast tissue. Developing and applying these assays to identify exposures of concern will facilitate efforts to reduce subsequent breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica S Helm
- Silent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, Suite 302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA
| | - Ruthann A Rudel
- Silent Spring Institute, 320 Nevada Street, Suite 302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Immunohistochemical Detection of the Retinoblastoma Protein. Methods Mol Biol 2018. [PMID: 29468544 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7565-5_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register]
Abstract
The retinoblastoma protein (pRB) plays a key role in proliferative control and genome stability. For these reasons its functions are considered to be tumor suppressive. Its functional status offers critical insight into proliferative control signaling in tissues and in developing malignancies. In this chapter, we outline basic procedures to detect the retinoblastoma protein in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue sections. In addition, we provide protocols to detect phosphorylation levels of pRB in tissues and offer controls to ensure fidelity of measurement. Importantly, these staining methods utilize broadly available reagents and equipment making them accessible to most biomedical research laboratories.
Collapse
|
5
|
Liao Y, Du W. An Rb family-independent E2F3 transcription factor variant impairs STAT5 signaling and mammary gland remodeling during pregnancy in mice. J Biol Chem 2018; 293:3156-3167. [PMID: 29330306 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.ra117.000583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
E2F transcription factors are regulated by binding to the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor family of proteins. Previously, we reported an E2FLQ mutation that disrupts the binding with Rb proteins without affecting the transcriptional activity of E2F. We also showed that mouse embryonic fibroblasts with an E2F3LQ mutation exhibit increased E2F activity and more rapid cell proliferation. In this report, we analyzed E2F3LQ mice to further characterize the in vivo consequences of Rb family-independent E2F3 activity. We found that homozygous E2F3LQ mice were viable and had no obvious developmental defects or tumor growth. Our results also indicated that E2F3LQ cells largely retain normal control of cell proliferation in vivo However, female E2F3LQ mice had partial nursing defects. Examination of the E2F3LQ mammary glands revealed increased caveolin-1 (CAV1) expression, reduced prolactin receptor/Stat5 signaling, and impaired pregnancy-induced cell proliferation and differentiation. Of note, ChIP experiments disclosed that E2F3 binds the CAV1 promoter. Furthermore, E2F3 overexpression induced CAV1 expression, and CRISPR/CAS9-mediated E2F3 knockout reduced CAV1 levels and also increased prolactin receptor-induced Stat5 signaling in mammary epithelial cells. Our results suggest that the Rb family-independent E2F3 LQ variant inhibits pregnancy-induced mammary gland cell proliferation and differentiation by up-regulating CAV1 expression and inhibiting Stat5 signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liao
- From the Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
| | - Wei Du
- From the Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dzidziguri D, Modebadze I, Bakuradze E, Mosidze G, Berulava M. Determination of The Properties of Rat Brain Thermostable Protein Complex which Inhibit Cell Proliferation. CELL JOURNAL 2017; 19:552-558. [PMID: 29105389 PMCID: PMC5672093 DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2018.4835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cell proliferation is known to be controlled by many networks of regulatory proteins. These multiple and complicated mechanisms of control are still being investigated. The aim of the present study is to determine the different properties of adult rat brain thermostable protein complex (TPC) which affect cell proliferation. MATERIALS AND METHODS This experimental study used brain, kidney and liver tissue from adult (150-170 g) and adolescent (7, 10, 21, 28 days) white rats, adult pigeons and mice. Brain TPC was isolated by alcohol extraction, and primary antibodies Ki67 and GAD65/67 were used for immunohistochemistry, evaluation of transcriptional activity of the tissues and determination of the mitotic index. RESULTS The results show that brain TPC from rats reversibly decreases cell proliferation by inhibiting transcription. The evidence suggests that TPC is not species-specific, but expresses tissue specificity with regards to terminally differentiated cells. Rat brain TPC inhibits mitotic activity of the progenitor cells in the dentate gyrus of adolescent rats, and corresponding with this decrease in the mitotic index the number of Ki67 positive cells increases. Simultaneously, the number of GAD65/67-positive cells in the hippocampus decreases by approximately threefold. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that rat brain TPC causes the reversible suppression of cell proliferation through the inhibition of transcription. Inhibitory effects of rat brain TPC leads to an increase the number of cells in the cell cycle, in tissues of adolescent rats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Dzidziguri
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia. Electronic address :
| | - Irina Modebadze
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Ekaterine Bakuradze
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Giorgi Mosidze
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Manana Berulava
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.,Faculty of Natural Sciences and Healthcare, Sokhumi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bu S, Zhang Q, Wang Q, Lai D. Human amniotic epithelial cells inhibit growth of epithelial ovarian cancer cells via TGF‑β1-mediated cell cycle arrest. Int J Oncol 2017; 51:1405-1414. [PMID: 29048644 PMCID: PMC5642391 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
It is reported that human amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs) endow intrinsic antitumor effects on certain kinds of cancer. This research was designed to evaluate whether hAECs endowed potential anticancer properties on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells in vivo and in vitro, which has not been reported before. In this study, we established a xenografted BALB/c nude mouse model by subcutaneously co-injecting ovarian cancer cell line, SK-OV-3, and hAECs for 28 days. In ex vivo experiments, CCK‑8 cell viability assay, real-time PCR, cell counting assay, cell cycle analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay were used to detect the effects of hAEC‑secreted factors on the proliferation and cell cycle progression of EOC cells. A cytokine array was conducted to detect anticancer-related cytokines released from hAECs. Human recombinant TGF‑β1 and TGF‑β1 antibody were used to treat EOC cells and analyzed whether TGF‑β1 contributed to the cell cycle arrest. Results from in vivo and ex vivo experiments showed that hAEC-secreted factors and rhTGF‑β1 decreased proliferation of EOC cells and induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in cancer cells, which could be partially reversed by excess TGF‑β1 antibody. These data indicate that hAECs endow potential anticancer properties on epithelial ovarian cancer in vivo and in vitro which is partially mediated by hAEC‑secreted TGF‑β1-induced cell cycle arrest. This study suggests a potential application of hAEC‑based therapy against epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shixia Bu
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, P.R. China
| | - Qiuwan Zhang
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, P.R. China
| | - Qian Wang
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, P.R. China
| | - Dongmei Lai
- The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thwaites MJ, Cecchini MJ, Talluri S, Passos DT, Carnevale J, Dick FA. Multiple molecular interactions redundantly contribute to RB-mediated cell cycle control. Cell Div 2017; 12:3. [PMID: 28293272 PMCID: PMC5348811 DOI: 10.1186/s13008-017-0029-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The G1-S phase transition is critical to maintaining proliferative control and preventing carcinogenesis. The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor is a key regulator of this step in the cell cycle. Results Here we use a structure–function approach to evaluate the contributions of multiple protein interaction surfaces on pRB towards cell cycle regulation. SAOS2 cell cycle arrest assays showed that disruption of three separate binding surfaces were necessary to inhibit pRB-mediated cell cycle control. Surprisingly, mutation of some interaction surfaces had no effect on their own. Rather, they only contributed to cell cycle arrest in the absence of other pRB dependent arrest functions. Specifically, our data shows that pRB–E2F interactions are competitive with pRB–CDH1 interactions, implying that interchangeable growth arrest functions underlie pRB’s ability to block proliferation. Additionally, disruption of similar cell cycle control mechanisms in genetically modified mutant mice results in ectopic DNA synthesis in the liver. Conclusions Our work demonstrates that pRB utilizes a network of mechanisms to prevent cell cycle entry. This has important implications for the use of new CDK4/6 inhibitors that aim to activate this proliferative control network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Thwaites
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry, Western University, London, ON Canada
| | - Matthew J Cecchini
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry, Western University, London, ON Canada
| | - Srikanth Talluri
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry, Western University, London, ON Canada
| | - Daniel T Passos
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry, Western University, London, ON Canada
| | - Jasmyne Carnevale
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry, Western University, London, ON Canada
| | - Frederick A Dick
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Canada.,Children's Health Research Institute, London, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry, Western University, London, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
A retinoblastoma allele that is mutated at its common E2F interaction site inhibits cell proliferation in gene-targeted mice. Mol Cell Biol 2014; 34:2029-45. [PMID: 24662053 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.01589-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The retinoblastoma protein (pRB) is best known for regulating cell proliferation through E2F transcription factors. In this report, we investigate the properties of a targeted mutation that disrupts pRB interactions with the transactivation domain of E2Fs. Mice that carry this mutation endogenously (Rb1(ΔG)) are defective for pRB-dependent repression of E2F target genes. Except for an accelerated entry into S phase in response to serum stimulation, cell cycle regulation in Rb1(ΔG/ΔG) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) strongly resembles that of the wild type. In a serum deprivation-induced cell cycle exit, Rb1(ΔG/ΔG) MEFs display a magnitude of E2F target gene derepression similar to that of Rb1(-/-) cells, even though Rb1(ΔG/ΔG) cells exit the cell cycle normally. Interestingly, cell cycle arrest in Rb1(ΔG/ΔG) MEFs is responsive to p16 expression and gamma irradiation, indicating that alternate mechanisms can be activated in G1 to arrest proliferation. Some Rb1(ΔG/ΔG) mice die neonatally with a muscle degeneration phenotype, while the others live a normal life span with no evidence of spontaneous tumor formation. Most tissues appear histologically normal while being accompanied by derepression of pRB-regulated E2F targets. This suggests that non-E2F-, pRB-dependent pathways may have a more relevant role in proliferative control than previously identified.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The G1/S-phase restriction point is an important landmark in the mammalian cell division cycle. The key regulator of the G1/S transition is the retinoblastoma gene product (pRB). It prevents the transcription of genes required for S-phase progression by repressing E2F transcription factors. An increase in Cdk phosphorylation of pRB causes the release of E2F transcription factors and advancement into S phase. Here we describe two simple techniques used to assess pRB phosphorylation and E2F transcription during G1/S progression.
Collapse
|
11
|
MiR-106b expression determines the proliferation paradox of TGF-β in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2013; 34:84-93. [PMID: 24292682 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2013] [Revised: 10/18/2013] [Accepted: 10/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
TGF-β has paradoxical effects on cancer cell proliferation, as it suppresses proliferation of normal epithelial and low-invasive cancer cells, but enhances that of high-invasive cancer cells. However, how cancer cells acquire the ability to evade the tumor-suppressing effects of TGF-β, yet still take advantage of its tumor-promoting effects, remains elusive. Here, we identified miR-106b as a molecular switch to determine TGF-β effects on cell proliferation. TGF-β1 enhances the transcription of miR-106b via a promoter independent of its host gene MCM7 by activating c-jun. In high-invasive breast cancer cells, miR-106b is upregulated by TGF-β1 at a much higher level than that in normal or low-invasive cancer cells. Accumulation of miR-106b counterbalances TGF-β growth-inhibiting effects by eliminating activated retinoblastoma (RB) and results in enhanced proliferation. Furthermore, miR-106b mediates TGF-β effects on tumor growth and metastasis in breast cancer xenografts. In addition, miR-106b expression is elevated in higher stage tumors and correlated with tumor progression in breast cancer patients. These findings suggest that high level of miR-106b induced by TGF-β determines the tumor-promoting effects of TGF-β in breast cancer.
Collapse
|
12
|
Orr B, Compton DA. A double-edged sword: how oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes can contribute to chromosomal instability. Front Oncol 2013; 3:164. [PMID: 23825799 PMCID: PMC3695391 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2013] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Most solid tumors are characterized by abnormal chromosome numbers (aneuploidy) and karyotypic profiling has shown that the majority of these tumors are heterogeneous and chromosomally unstable. Chromosomal instability (CIN) is defined as persistent mis-segregation of whole chromosomes and is caused by defects during mitosis. Large-scale genome sequencing has failed to reveal frequent mutations of genes encoding proteins involved in mitosis. On the contrary, sequencing has revealed that most mutated genes in cancer fall into a limited number of core oncogenic signaling pathways that regulate the cell cycle, cell growth, and apoptosis. This led to the notion that the induction of oncogenic signaling is a separate event from the loss of mitotic fidelity, but a growing body of evidence suggests that oncogenic signaling can deregulate cell cycle progression, growth, and differentiation as well as cause CIN. These new results indicate that the induction of CIN can no longer be considered separately from the cancer-associated driver mutations. Here we review the primary causes of CIN in mitosis and discuss how the oncogenic activation of key signal transduction pathways contributes to the induction of CIN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Orr
- Department of Biochemistry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Hanover, NH , USA ; The Norris-Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Hanover, NH , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Coschi CH, Dick FA. Chromosome instability and deregulated proliferation: an unavoidable duo. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012; 69:2009-24. [PMID: 22223110 PMCID: PMC11114883 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-011-0910-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2011] [Revised: 12/15/2011] [Accepted: 12/19/2011] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The concept that aneuploidy is a characteristic of malignant cells has long been known; however, the idea that aneuploidy is an active contributor to tumorigenesis, as opposed to being an associated phenotype, is more recent in its evolution. At the same time, we are seeing the emergence of novel roles for tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes in genome stability. These include the adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC), p53, the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (RB1), and Ras. Originally, many of these genes were thought to be tumor suppressive or oncogenic solely because of their role in proliferative control. Because of the frequency with which they are disrupted in cancer, chromosome instability caused by their dysfunction may be more central to tumorigenesis than previously thought. Therefore, this review will highlight how the proper function of cell cycle regulatory genes contributes to the maintenance of genome stability, and how their mutation in cancer obligatorily connects proliferation and chromosome instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney H. Coschi
- London Regional Cancer Program, University of Western Ontario, London, ON Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON Canada
| | - Frederick A. Dick
- London Regional Cancer Program, University of Western Ontario, London, ON Canada
- Children’s Health Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON Canada
- Cancer Research Laboratories, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON N6A 4L6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The retinoblastoma family of proteins and their regulatory functions in the mammalian cell division cycle. Cell Div 2012; 7:10. [PMID: 22417103 PMCID: PMC3325851 DOI: 10.1186/1747-1028-7-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2012] [Accepted: 03/14/2012] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The retinoblastoma (RB) family of proteins are found in organisms as distantly related as humans, plants, and insects. These proteins play a key role in regulating advancement of the cell division cycle from the G1 to S-phases. This is achieved through negative regulation of two important positive regulators of cell cycle entry, E2F transcription factors and cyclin dependent kinases. In growth arrested cells transcriptional activity by E2Fs is repressed by RB proteins. Stimulation of cell cycle entry by growth factor signaling leads to activation of cyclin dependent kinases. They in turn phosphorylate and inactivate the RB family proteins, leading to E2F activation and additional cyclin dependent kinase activity. This propels the cell cycle irreversibly forward leading to DNA synthesis. This review will focus on the basic biochemistry and cell biology governing the regulation and activity of mammalian RB family proteins in cell cycle control.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The regulation of cell proliferation is central to tissue morphogenesis during the development of multicellular organisms. Furthermore, loss of control of cell proliferation underlies the pathology of diseases like cancer. As such there is great need to be able to investigate cell proliferation and quantitate the proportion of cells in each phase of the cell cycle. It is also of vital importance to indistinguishably identify cells that are replicating their DNA within a larger population. Since a cell′s decision to proliferate is made in the G1 phase immediately before initiating DNA synthesis and progressing through the rest of the cell cycle, detection of DNA synthesis at this stage allows for an unambiguous determination of the status of growth regulation in cell culture experiments. DNA content in cells can be readily quantitated by flow cytometry of cells stained with propidium iodide, a fluorescent DNA intercalating dye. Similarly, active DNA synthesis can be quantitated by culturing cells in the presence of radioactive thymidine, harvesting the cells, and measuring the incorporation of radioactivity into an acid insoluble fraction. We have considerable expertise with cell cycle analysis and recommend a different approach. We Investigate cell proliferation using bromodeoxyuridine/fluorodeoxyuridine (abbreviated simply as BrdU) staining that detects the incorporation of these thymine analogs into recently synthesized DNA. Labeling and staining cells with BrdU, combined with total DNA staining by propidium iodide and analysis by flow cytometry1 offers the most accurate measure of cells in the various stages of the cell cycle. It is our preferred method because it combines the detection of active DNA synthesis, through antibody based staining of BrdU, with total DNA content from propidium iodide. This allows for the clear separation of cells in G1 from early S phase, or late S phase from G2/M. Furthermore, this approach can be utilized to investigate the effects of many different cell stimuli and pharmacologic agents on the regulation of progression through these different cell cycle phases. In this report we describe methods for labeling and staining cultured cells, as well as their analysis by flow cytometry. We also include experimental examples of how this method can be used to measure the effects of growth inhibiting signals from cytokines such as TGF-β1, and proliferative inhibitors such as the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, p27KIP1. We also include an alternate protocol that allows for the analysis of cell cycle position in a sub-population of cells within a larger culture5. In this case, we demonstrate how to detect a cell cycle arrest in cells transfected with the retinoblastoma gene even when greatly outnumbered by untransfected cells in the same culture. These examples illustrate the many ways that DNA staining and flow cytometry can be utilized and adapted to investigate fundamental questions of mammalian cell cycle control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Cecchini
- Department of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bourgo RJ, Thangavel C, Ertel A, Bergseid J, McClendon AK, Wilkens L, Witkiewicz AK, Wang JYJ, Knudsen ES. RB restricts DNA damage-initiated tumorigenesis through an LXCXE-dependent mechanism of transcriptional control. Mol Cell 2011; 43:663-72. [PMID: 21855804 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2010] [Revised: 03/28/2011] [Accepted: 06/26/2011] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The LXCXE peptide motif facilitates interaction between the RB tumor suppressor and a large number of cellular proteins that are expected to impinge on diverse biological processes. In vitro and in vivo analyses demonstrated that LXCXE binding function is dispensable for RB promoter association and control of basal gene expression. Dependence on this function of RB is unmasked after DNA damage, wherein LXCXE binding is essential for exerting control over E2F3 and suppressing cell-cycle progression in the presence of genotoxic stress. Gene expression profiling revealed that the transcriptional program coordinated by this specific aspect of RB is associated with progression of human hepatocellular carcinoma and poor disease outcome. Consistent with these findings, biological challenge revealed a requirement for LXCXE binding in suppression of genotoxin-initiated hepatocellular carcinoma in vivo. Together, these studies establish an essential role of the LXCXE binding motif for RB-mediated transcriptional control, response to genotoxic insult, and tumor suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Bourgo
- Department of Cancer Biology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Olsen HG, Hayes BJ, Kent MP, Nome T, Svendsen M, Larsgard AG, Lien S. Genome-wide association mapping in Norwegian Red cattle identifies quantitative trait loci for fertility and milk production on BTA12. Anim Genet 2011; 42:466-74. [PMID: 21906098 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02179.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Reproductive performance is a critical trait in dairy cattle. Poor reproductive performance leads to prolonged calving intervals, higher culling rates and extra expenses related to multiple inseminations, veterinary treatments and replacements. Genetic gain for improved reproduction through traditional selection is often slow because of low heritability and negative correlations with production traits. Detection of DNA markers associated with improved reproductive performance through genome-wide association studies could lead to genetic gain that is more balanced between fertility and production. Norwegian Red cattle are well suited for such studies, as very large numbers of detailed reproduction records are available. We conducted a genome-wide association study for non-return rate, fertility treatments and retained placenta using almost 1 million records on these traits and 17 343 genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Genotyping costs were minimized by genotyping the sires of the cows recorded and by using daughter averages as phenotypes. The genotyped sires were assigned to either a discovery or a validation population. Associations were only considered to be validated if they were significant in both groups. Strong associations were found and validated on chromosomes 1, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12. Several of these were highly supported by findings in other studies. The most important result was an association for non-return rate in heifers in a region of BTA12 where several associations for milk production traits have previously been found. Subsequent fine-mapping verified the presence of a quantitative trait loci (QTL) having opposing effects on non-return rate and milk production at 18 Mb. The other reproduction QTL did not have pleiotropic effects on milk production, and these are therefore of considerable interest for use in marker-assisted selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H G Olsen
- Centre for Integrative Genetics, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, N-1432 Aas, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Francis SM, Chakrabarti S, Dick FA. A context-specific role for retinoblastoma protein-dependent negative growth control in suppressing mammary tumorigenesis. PLoS One 2011; 6:e16434. [PMID: 21364977 PMCID: PMC3043004 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2010] [Accepted: 12/23/2010] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ability to respond to anti-growth signals is critical to maintain tissue homeostasis and loss of this negative growth control safeguard is considered a hallmark of cancer. Negative growth regulation generally occurs during the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle, yet the redundancy and complexity among components of this regulatory network has made it difficult to discern how negative growth cues protect cells from aberrant proliferation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS The retinoblastoma protein (pRB) acts as the final barrier to prevent cells from entering into the cell cycle. By introducing subtle changes in the endogenous mouse Rb1 gene (Rb1(ΔL)), we have previously shown that interactions at the LXCXE binding cleft are necessary for the proper response to anti-growth signals such as DNA damage and TGF-β, with minimal effects on overall development. This disrupts the balance of pro- and anti-growth signals in mammary epithelium of Rb1(ΔL/ΔL) mice. Here we show that Rb1(ΔL/ΔL) mice are more prone to mammary tumors in the Wap-p53(R172H) transgenic background indicating that negative growth regulation is important for tumor suppression in these mice. In contrast, the same defect in anti-growth control has no impact on Neu-induced mammary tumorigenesis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE Our work demonstrates that negative growth control by pRB acts as a crucial barrier against oncogenic transformation. Strikingly, our data also reveals that this tumor suppressive effect is context-dependent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M. Francis
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Subrata Chakrabarti
- Department of Pathology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frederick A. Dick
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bremner R, Zacksenhaus E. Cyclins, Cdks, E2f, Skp2, and more at the first international RB Tumor Suppressor Meeting. Cancer Res 2010; 70:6114-8. [PMID: 20610631 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The RB1 gene was cloned because its inactivation causes the childhood ocular tumor, retinoblastoma. It is widely expressed, inactivated in most human malignancies, and present in diverse organisms from mammals to plants. Initially, retinoblastoma protein (pRB) was linked to cell cycle regulation, but it also regulates senescence, apoptosis, autophagy, differentiation, genome stability, immunity, telomere function, stem cell biology, and embryonic development. In the 23 years since the gene was cloned, a formal international symposium focused on the RB pathway has not been held. The "First International RB Tumor Suppressor Meeting" (Toronto, Canada, November 19-21, 2009) established a biennial event to bring experts in the field together to discuss how the RB family ("pocket proteins"), as well as its regulators and effectors, influence biology and human disease. We summarize major new breakthroughs and emerging trends presented at the meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rod Bremner
- Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Coschi CH, Martens AL, Ritchie K, Francis SM, Chakrabarti S, Berube NG, Dick FA. Mitotic chromosome condensation mediated by the retinoblastoma protein is tumor-suppressive. Genes Dev 2010; 24:1351-63. [PMID: 20551166 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1917610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Condensation and segregation of mitotic chromosomes is a critical process for cellular propagation, and, in mammals, mitotic errors can contribute to the pathogenesis of cancer. In this report, we demonstrate that the retinoblastoma protein (pRB), a well-known regulator of progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle, plays a critical role in mitotic chromosome condensation that is independent of G1-to-S-phase regulation. Using gene targeted mutant mice, we studied this aspect of pRB function in isolation, and demonstrate that it is an essential part of pRB-mediated tumor suppression. Cancer-prone Trp53(-/-) mice succumb to more aggressive forms of cancer when pRB's ability to condense chromosomes is compromised. Furthermore, we demonstrate that defective mitotic chromosome structure caused by mutant pRB accelerates loss of heterozygosity, leading to earlier tumor formation in Trp53(+/-) mice. These data reveal a new mechanism of tumor suppression, facilitated by pRB, in which genome stability is maintained by proper condensation of mitotic chromosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney H Coschi
- London Regional Cancer Program, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Henley SA, Francis SM, Demone J, Ainsworth P, Dick FA. A cancer derived mutation in the retinoblastoma gene with a distinct defect for LXCXE dependent interactions. Cancer Cell Int 2010; 10:8. [PMID: 20298605 PMCID: PMC2859746 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2867-10-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2010] [Accepted: 03/18/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The interaction between viral oncoproteins such as Simian virus 40 TAg, adenovirus E1A, and human papilloma virus E7, and the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) occurs through a well characterized peptide sequence, LXCXE, on the viral protein and a well conserved groove in the pocket domain of pRB. Cellular proteins, such as histone deacetylases, also use this mechanism to interact with the retinoblastoma protein to repress transcription at cell cycle regulated genes. For these reasons this region of the pRB pocket domain is thought to play a critical role in growth suppression. RESULTS In this study, we identify and characterize a tumor derived allele of the retinoblastoma gene (RB1) that possesses a discrete defect in its ability to interact with LXCXE motif containing proteins that compromises proliferative control. To assess the frequency of similar mutations in the RB1 gene in human cancer, we screened blood and tumor samples for similar alleles. We screened almost 700 samples and did not detect additional mutations, indicating that this class of mutation is rare. CONCLUSIONS Our work provides proof of principal that alleles encoding distinct, partial loss of function mutations in the retinoblastoma gene that specifically lose LXCXE dependent interactions, are found in human cancer.
Collapse
|
22
|
Talluri S, Isaac CE, Ahmad M, Henley SA, Francis SM, Martens AL, Bremner R, Dick FA. A G1 checkpoint mediated by the retinoblastoma protein that is dispensable in terminal differentiation but essential for senescence. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:948-60. [PMID: 20008551 PMCID: PMC2815577 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.01168-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2009] [Revised: 09/23/2009] [Accepted: 12/07/2009] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Terminally differentiated cell types are needed to live and function in a postmitotic state for a lifetime. Cellular senescence is another type of permanent arrest that blocks the proliferation of cells in response to genotoxic stress. Here we show that the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) uses a mechanism to block DNA replication in senescence that is distinct from its role in permanent cell cycle exit associated with terminal differentiation. Our work demonstrates that a subtle mutation in pRB that cripples its ability to interact with chromatin regulators impairs heterochromatinization and repression of E2F-responsive promoters during senescence. In contrast, terminally differentiated nerve and muscle cells bearing the same mutation fully exit the cell cycle and block E2F-responsive gene expression by a different mechanism. Remarkably, this reveals that pRB recruits chromatin regulators primarily to engage a stress-responsive G(1) arrest program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srikanth Talluri
- London Regional Cancer Program, Children's Health Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Genetics and Development Division, Toronto Western Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian E. Isaac
- London Regional Cancer Program, Children's Health Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Genetics and Development Division, Toronto Western Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohammad Ahmad
- London Regional Cancer Program, Children's Health Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Genetics and Development Division, Toronto Western Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shauna A. Henley
- London Regional Cancer Program, Children's Health Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Genetics and Development Division, Toronto Western Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah M. Francis
- London Regional Cancer Program, Children's Health Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Genetics and Development Division, Toronto Western Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alison L. Martens
- London Regional Cancer Program, Children's Health Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Genetics and Development Division, Toronto Western Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rod Bremner
- London Regional Cancer Program, Children's Health Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Genetics and Development Division, Toronto Western Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frederick A. Dick
- London Regional Cancer Program, Children's Health Research Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, Genetics and Development Division, Toronto Western Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|