Domains of the rat rDNA promoter must be aligned stereospecifically

DNA binding preferences of S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase I Core Factor reveal a preference for the GC-minor groove and a conserved binding mechanism

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Core Factor (CF) is a key evolutionarily conserved transcription initiation factor that helps recruit RNA polymerase I (Pol I) to the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter. Upregulated Pol I transcription has been linked to many cancers, and targeting Pol I is an attractive and emerging anti-cancer strategy. Using yeast as a model system, we characterized how CF binds to the Pol I promoter by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). Synthetic DNA competitors along with anti-tumor drugs and nucleic acid stains that act as DNA groove blockers were used to discover the binding preference of yeast CF. Our results show that CF employs a unique binding mechanism where it prefers the GC-rich minor groove within the rDNA promoter. In addition, we show that yeast CF is able to bind to the human rDNA promoter sequence that is divergent in DNA sequence and demonstrate CF sensitivity to the human specific Pol I inhibitor, CX-5461. Finally, we show that the human Core Promoter Element (CPE) can functionally replace the yeast Core Element (CE) in vivo when aligned by conserved DNA structural features rather than DNA sequence. Together, these findings suggest that the yeast CF and the human ortholog Selectivity Factor 1 (SL1) use an evolutionarily conserved, structure-based mechanism to target DNA. Their shared mechanism may offer a new avenue in using yeast to explore current and future Pol I anti-cancer compounds.

Ribosomal chromatin organization

Mammalian cells contain approximately 400 copies of the ribosomal RNA genes organized as tandem, head-to-tail repeats spread among 6-8 chromosomes. Only a subset of the genes is transcribed at any given time. Experimental evidence suggests that, in a specific cell type, only a fraction of the genes exists in a conformation that can be transcribed. An increasing body of study indicates that eukaryotic ribosomal RNA genes exist in either a heterochromatic nucleosomal state or in open euchromatic states in which they can be, or are, transcribed. This review will attempt to summarize our current understanding of the structure and organization of ribosomal chromatin.

Characterization of a fission yeast subunit of an RNA polymerase I essential transcription initiation factor, SpRrn7h/TAF(I)68, that bridges yeast and mammals: association with SpRrn11h and the core ribosomal RNA gene promoter

Production of eukaryotic ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) entails sequence-specific recognition of regulatory sequences in the rRNA gene promoter. A putative subunit of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe essential transcription initiation factor for rRNA synthesis has been identified that shares homology with both murine TAF(I)68 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrn7p, subunits of their species' transcription initiation factor. Affinity purified putative SpRrn7h and associated factors, including a putative Rrn11p homolog, SpRrn11h, bear RNA polymerase I transcription initiation factor activity, and recombinant SpRrn7h associates with S. pombe core rDNA promoter sequences. In the first widespread search for putative homologs of SpRrn7h/murine TAF(I)68, and SpRrn11h/murine TAF(I)48, multiple ones were identified across eukaryotes. Analysis of residues conserved between the fission yeast and murine essential initiation factor subunits aided in these identifications. Sequences in the core rRNA gene promoter contributing to transcriptional activation were investigated, including a perfect TATAAA element located at -35.

Regulation of RNA polymerase I transcription in yeast and vertebrates

This article focuses on what is currently known about the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase I (pol I) in eukaryotic organisms at opposite ends of the evolutionary spectrum--a yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and vertebrates, including mice, frogs, and man. Contemporary studies that have defined the DNA sequence elements are described, as well as the majority of the basal transcription factors essential for pol I transcription. Situations in which pol I transcription is known to be regulated are reviewed and possible regulatory mechanisms are critically discussed. Some aspects of basal pol I transcription machinery appear to have been conserved from fungi to vertebrates, but other aspects have evolved, perhaps to meet the needs of a metazoan organism. Different parts of the pol I transcription machinery are regulatory targets depending on different physiological stimuli. This suggests that multiple signaling pathways may also be involved. The involvement of ribosomal genes and their transcripts in events such as mitosis, cancer, and aging is discussed.

Regulation of mammalian ribosomal gene transcription by RNA polymerase I

All cells, from prokaryotes to vertebrates, synthesize vast amounts of ribosomal RNA to produce the several million new ribosomes per generation that are required to maintain the protein synthetic capacity of the daughter cells. Ribosomal gene (rDNA) transcription is governed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) assisted by a dedicated set of transcription factors that mediate the specificity of transcription and are the targets of the pleiotrophic pathways the cell uses to adapt rRNA synthesis to cell growth. In the past few years we have begun to understand the specific functions of individual factors involved in rDNA transcription and to elucidate on a molecular level how transcriptional regulation is achieved. This article reviews our present knowledge of the molecular mechanism of rDNA transcriptional regulation.

Structure/function relationship of the cAMP response element in tyrosine hydroxylase gene transcription

Expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is limited to catecholamine-producing neurons and neuroendocrine cells in a cell type-specific manner and is inducible by the cAMP-regulated signaling pathway. Previous results indicated that the cAMP response element (CRE) residing at -45 to -38 base pairs upstream of the transcription initiation site is essential for both basal and cAMP-inducible promoter activity of the 2.4-kilobase or shorter upstream sequence of the TH gene (Kim, K. S., Lee, M. K., Carroll, J. , and Joh, T. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 15689-15695; Lazaroff, M. , Patankar, S., Yoon, S. O., and Chikaraishi, D. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21579-21589). Here, we further report that the CRE is critical for the promoter activity of the 5.6- or 9.0-kilobase upstream sequences of the rat TH gene, which had been shown to direct the cell-specific TH expression in vivo. To define the structure/function relationship of the CRE in transcriptional activation of the TH gene, we performed saturated mutational analyses of 12 nucleotides encompassing the CRE. Mutation of any nucleotide within the octamer motif results in a significant decrease of both basal and cAMP-inducible transcriptional activity of the TH reporter gene construct. Among the four nucleotides adjacent to the CRE (two 5' and two 3'), only the G residue at the immediate 3' position is important for full transcriptional activity. DNase I footprint analysis indicates a positive correlation between in vivo promoter activity and in vitro interaction between the CRE motif and its cognate protein factor(s). Reconstruction experiments using a TH promoter in which the native CRE was rendered inactive show that the CRE can transactivate transcription in either orientation through a window of approximately 200 base pairs upstream of the transcription initiation site, suggesting that CRE supports transcriptional activation of the TH gene in a distance-dependent manner. Finally, when the distance between the CRE and TATA box was changed by inserting an additional 5 or 10 bases, it was observed that both insertional mutations increased activity by approximately 3-fold. The cAMP inducibility was as intact as the wild type construct. Together, these results are consistent with a model in which transcriptional activation of the TH gene by the CRE requires that it be located within a certain proximity of the CAP site but does not depend on a stringent stereospecific alignment in relationship to the TATA element.

Virus induction of human IFN beta gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome

We present evidence that transcriptional activation of the human interferon-beta (IFN beta) gene requires the assembly of a higher order transcription enhancer complex (enhanceosome). This multicomponent complex includes at least three distinct transcription factors and the high mobility group protein HMG I(Y). Both the in vitro assembly and in vivo transcriptional activity of this complex require a precise helical relationship between individual transcription factor-binding sites. In addition, HMG I(Y), which binds specifically to three sites within the enhancer, promotes cooperative binding of transcriptional factors in vitro and is required for transcriptional synergy between these factors in vivo. Thus, HMG I(Y) plays an essential role in the assembly and function of the IFN beta gene enhanceosome.

Species specificity of transcription by RNA polymerase I

An unusual property of ribosomal gene transcription is its marked species specificity. This results from distinct promoter-recognition properties of the RNA polymerase I transcription apparatus. The purification and functional characterization of TIF-IB/SL1, a promoter-recognition factor containing the TATA-binding protein, as well as the recent cloning of cDNAs encoding the three subunits (TAF(I)s) of the respective human and mouse factor, will facilitate the molecular analysis of the mechanisms underlying species-specific rDNA transcription and reveal how the basal transcriptional machinery has evolved.

Higher-order nucleoprotein complexes in transcription: analogies with site-specific recombination

Regulation of transcription involves the assembly of multiprotein complexes at enhancers and promoters. Interactions between adjacent and non-adjacent DNA-binding proteins can augment the specificity and stability of multi-component nucleoprotein complexes. Recently, several proteins have been identified that can function as 'architectural' elements in the assembly of higher-order nucleoprotein structures reminiscent of those involved in site-specific recombination in prokaryotes.

Cloning and identification of the pig ribosomal gene promoter

Pig ribosomal RNA-encoding gene (rDNA) clones were obtained by screening a pig genomic DNA library. A 742-bp segment containing the promoter was sequenced. Using total pig RNA, the tsp (transcription start point) was defined by primer extension. A promoter-like region was found immediately upstream from the active promoter. Promoter function was studied by transfection of pig tissue culture cells and assayed by a highly sensitive RT-PCR method. Alignment of five mammalian rDNA promoter sequences, human, mouse, rat, rabbit and pig, showed five conserved subregions which may be important in transcriptional regulation. An unusual feature of the pig rDNA promoter is that instead of a G at -16, which is conserved in eukaryotes, there is a C.

Transcription from the rat 45S ribosomal DNA promoter does not require the factor UBF

For efficient transcription from the rat ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter by RNA polymerase I in vitro, at least two transcription factors, rat UBF and rat SL-1, are required. Transcription cannot take place in vitro in the absence of SL-1. On the other hand, there is considerable difference of opinion concerning the necessity for UBF in in vitro transcription mediated by RNA polymerase 1, and the requirement for UBF is not clear. Mammalian cells code for UBF1 and UBF2, two forms of UBF that differ in HMG box-2, one of four HMG boxes or DNA-binding domains. We have used a monospecific antibody raised to recombinant rat UBF to determine whether UBF1 and UBF2 are required for RNA polymerase I-mediated transcription. This antibody can detect as little as 1.35 x 10(-15) moles of UBF1 or UBF2 in an immunoblot. Fractionated extracts that were competent for transcription had no detectable UBF1 or UBF2 when assayed in immunoblots with this antiserum. This evidence supports the hypothesis that UBF is not required for transcription of the rat rDNA promoter in vitro and most likely functions as an auxillary transcription factor. In addition, we have fractionated rat UBF1 from UBF2 and tested each of them in in vitro transcription assays in which the 45S or spacer rDNA promoter template is limiting. UBF1 can activate transcription from either the 45S or spacer promoter under these conditions, whereas UBF2 cannot. This implies that there is a functional difference in the transactivation of RNA polymerase I by UBF1 and UBF2 in vitro.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)