TATA-dependent enhancer stimulation of promoter activity in mice is developmentally acquired

The oocyte-to-embryo transition in mouse: past, present, and future

The oocyte-to-embryo transition (OET) arguably initiates with formation of a primordial follicle and culminates with reprogramming of gene expression during the course of zygotic genome activation. This transition results in converting a highly differentiated cell, i.e. oocyte, to undifferentiated cells, i.e. initial blastomeres of a preimplantation embryo. A plethora of changes occur during the OET and include, but are not limited to, changes in transcription, chromatin structure, and protein synthesis; accumulation of macromolecules and organelles that will comprise the oocyte's maternal contribution to the early embryo; sequential acquisition of meiotic and developmental competence to name but a few. This review will focus on transcriptional and post-transcriptional changes that occur during OET in mouse because such changes are likely the major driving force for OET. We often take a historical and personal perspective, and highlight how advances in experimental methods often catalyzed conceptual advances in understanding the molecular bases for OET. We also point out questions that remain open and therefore represent topics of interest for future investigation.

TATA box and Sp1 sites mediate the activation of c-myc promoter P1 by immunoglobulin kappa enhancers

In Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) cells the proto-oncogene c-myc is transcriptionally activated by chromosomal translocation to the immunoglobulin (Ig) gene loci. This activation is characterized by preferential transcription from the c-myc promoter P1 and accomplished by juxtaposed Ig enhancer elements. To identify promoter elements required for enhancer-activated P1 transcription, we studied the activation of c-myc reporter gene constructs by the Ig kappa intron and 3' enhancers. Deletion analysis defined the core promoter with a TATA box and two adjacent GC/GT boxes upstream sufficient for basal and enhancer-activated transcription. Gel retardation assays revealed Sp1's binding affinity to the GC/GT box proximal to the TATA box to be higher than to the distal one. This difference correlated well with the resulting levels of transcription mediated by Sp1 in contransfection experiments in BL and Sp1-deficient SL2 cells. Sp3 also bound to the core promoter in vitro, but failed to transactivate in vivo. Mutation of the distal Sp1 site moderately affected basal transcription concomitant with a modest decrease in enhancer stimulation. Mutation of the proximal Sp1 site almost entirely abolished basal as well as enhanced transcription. A considerable level of basal transcription was maintained upon mutation of the TATA box, whereas enhancer-activated transcription largely was abolished. Stable transfection of the BL cell line Raji with constructs containing core promoter mutations confirmed that the proximal Sp1 site and the TATA box are essential for the activation of promoter P1 by the Ig kappa enhancers.

Optimizing fluorescent protein expression for quantitative fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy using herpes simplex thymidine kinase promoter sequences

The modulation of expression levels of fluorescent fusion proteins (FFPs) is central for recombinant DNA technologies in modern biology as overexpression of proteins contributes to artifacts in biological experiments. In addition, some microscopy techniques such as fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and single-molecule-based techniques are very sensitive to high expression levels of FFPs. To reduce the levels of recombinant protein expression in comparison with the commonly used, very strong CMV promoter, the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (TK) gene promoter, and mutants thereof were analyzed. Deletion mutants of the TK promoter were constructed and introduced into the Gateway® system for ectopic expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP), monomeric cherry (mCherry), and FFPs containing these FPs. Two promoter constructs, TK2ST and TKTSC, were established, which have optimal low expression levels suitable for FCS studies in U2OS, HeLa CCL2, NIH 3T3, and BALB/c cells. Interestingly, when tested in these four cell lines, promoter constructs having a deletion within TK gene 5'-UTR showed significantly higher protein expression levels than the equivalent constructs lacking this deletion. This suggests that a negative regulatory element is localized within the TK gene 5'-UTR.

Genome Duplication: The Heartbeat of Developing Organisms

The mechanism that duplicates the nuclear genome during the trillions of cell divisions required to develop from zygote to adult is the same throughout the eukarya, but the mechanisms that determine where, when and how much nuclear genome duplication occur regulate development and differ among the eukarya. They allow organisms to change the rate of cell proliferation during development, to activate zygotic gene expression independently of DNA replication, and to restrict nuclear DNA replication to once per cell division. They allow specialized cells to exit their mitotic cell cycle and differentiate into polyploid cells, and in some cases, to amplify the number of copies of specific genes. It is genome duplication that drives evolution, by virtue of the errors that inevitably occur when the same process is repeated trillions of times. It is, unfortunately, the same errors that produce age-related genetic disorders such as cancer.

Chromatin and DNA sequences in defining promoters for transcription initiation

One of the key events in eukaryotic gene regulation and consequent transcription is the assembly of general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II into a functional pre-initiation complex at core promoters. An emerging view of complexity arising from a variety of promoter associated DNA motifs, their binding factors and recent discoveries in characterising promoter associated chromatin properties brings an old question back into the limelight: how is a promoter defined? In addition to position-dependent DNA sequence motifs, accumulating evidence suggests that several parallel acting mechanisms are involved in orchestrating a pattern marked by the state of chromatin and general transcription factor binding in preparation for defining transcription start sites. In this review we attempt to summarise these promoter features and discuss the available evidence pointing at their interactions in defining transcription initiation in developmental contexts. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin and epigenetic regulation of animal development.

Evaluation of promoters for use in tissue-specific gene delivery

Vectors used in gene therapy require an expression cassette. The expression cassette consists of three important components: promoter, therapeutic gene and polyadenylation signal. The promoter is essential to control expression of the therapeutic gene. A tissue-specific promoter is a promoter that has activity in only certain cell types. Use of a tissue-specific promoter in the expression cassette can restrict unwanted transgene expression as well as facilitate persistent transgene expression. Therefore, choosing the correct promoter, especially a tissue-specific promoter, is a major step toward achieving successful therapeutic transgene expression. Ideally, the elements of the natural promoter region, necessary for obtaining the required level of the gene expression while retaining tissue-specificity, should be known. Also, it is important to understand whether interactions occur between the promoter region and the rest of the vector genome that could affect promoter activity and specificity. To assess this, it is helpful to select a suitable vector system that will be used in further gene therapy studies. Second, have one or several candidate tissue-specific promoters available for use. Third, ideally have an in vitro cell model suitable to evaluate tissue-specificity. Fourth, have a convenient in vivo animal model to use. Fifth, select a good reporter gene system. Next, using conventional recombinant DNA techniques create different promoter constructs with the selected vector system. Lastly, have a suitable transfection method to test the plasmid constructs in both the in vitro and the in vivo models.

Real-time monitoring of functional interactions between upstream and core promoter sequences in living cells of sea urchin embryos

There are some functional compatibilities between upstream and core promoter sequences for transcriptional activation in yeast, Drosophila and mammalian cells. Here we examined whether similar compatibilities exist in sea urchin embryos, and if so, whether they are dynamically regulated during early development. Two reporter plasmids, each containing a test promoter conjugated to either CFP or YFP, were concurrently introduced into embryos, and their expression patterns were studied by fluorescence microscopy. The upstream sequence of the Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus (Hp) OtxE promoter drives the expression of its own core promoter and that of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Sp) Spec2a in different embryonic regions, especially at the late gastrula stage. Interestingly, when the four putative transcription factor binding sites of this upstream sequence were individually mutated, the resulting sequences directed different spatiotemporal expression from the same set of two core promoters, indicating that combinations of upstream factors may determine core promoter usage in sea urchin embryos. In addition, the insertion or deletion of consensus or nonconsensus TATA sequences changed the expression profile significantly, irrespective of whether the upstream sequence was intact or mutated. Thus, the TATA sequence may serve as a primary determinant for core promoter selection in these cells.

RNA transcript profiling during zygotic gene activation in the preimplantation mouse embryo

Zygotic gene activation is essential for development beyond the 2-cell stage in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Based on alpha-amanitin-sensitive BrUTP incorporation, transcription initiates in the 1-cell embryo and a major reprogramming of gene expression driven by newly expressed genes is prominently observed during the 2-cell stage. Superimposed on genome activation is the development of a transcriptionally repressive state that is mediated at the level of chromatin structure. The identity of the genes that are expressed during the 1- and 2-cell stages, however, is poorly described, as are those genes involved in mediating the transcriptionally repressive state. Using the Affymetrix MOE430 mouse GeneChip set, we characterized the set of alpha-amanitin-sensitive genes expressed during the 1- and 2-cell stages, and we used Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE) and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to identify biological and molecular processes represented by these genes, as well as interactions among them. We find that although the 1-cell embryo is transcriptionally active, we did not detect any transcripts present on the MOE430 GeneChip set to be alpha-amanitin-sensitive. Thus, what the BrUTP incorporation represents remains elusive. About 17% of genes expressed in the 2-cell embryo are alpha-amanitin-sensitive. EASE analysis reveals that genes involved in ribosome biogenesis and assembly, protein synthesis, RNA metabolism and transcription are over-represented, suggesting that genome activation during 2-cell stage may not be as global and promiscuous as previously proposed. IPA implicated Myc and Hdac1 as candidate genes involved in genome activation and the development of the transcriptionally repressive state, respectively.

Transcript profiling during preimplantation mouse development

Studies using low-resolution methods to assess gene expression during preimplantation mouse development indicate that changes in gene expression either precede or occur concomitantly with the major morphological transitions, that is, conversion of the oocyte to totipotent 2-cell blastomeres, compaction, and blastocyst formation. Using microarrays, we characterized global changes in gene expression and used Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE) to identify biological and molecular processes that accompany and likely underlie these transitions. The analysis confirmed previously described processes or events, but more important, EASE revealed new insights. Response to DNA damage and DNA repair genes are overrepresented in the oocyte compared to 1-cell through blastocyst stages and may reflect the oocyte's response to selective pressures to insure genomic integrity; fertilization results in changes in the transcript profile in the 1-cell embryo that are far greater than previously recognized; and genome activation during 2-cell stage may not be as global and promiscuous as previously proposed, but rather far more selective, with genes involved in transcription and RNA processing being preferentially expressed. These results validate this hypothesis-generating approach by identifying genes involved in critical biological processes that can be the subject of a more traditional hypothesis-driven approach.

Transcription Factor Expression Patterns in Bovine In Vitro-Derived Embryos Prior to Maternal-Zygotic Transition1

Maternal-zygotic transition (MZT) is a complex phenomenon characterized by the initiation of transcription in the embryo and the replacement of maternal mRNA with embryonic mRNA. In order for this to occur, transcriptional activation requires various factors and conditions. Our hypothesis is that the lack of transcription in the bovine pre-MZT embryo is due, in part, to an incomplete or dormant transcriptional apparatus. Therefore, in accordance with this hypothesis, functioning transcriptional mechanisms should appear in the eight-cell bovine embryo to facilitate embryonic transcription during the MZT. With this in mind, we examined the presence of selected transcription factors during preimplantation embryo development to establish how their transcript levels change in bovine pre-MZT embryos. To achieve this goal, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to quantify the mRNA level of several different transcription factors (YY1, HMGA1, RY-1, P300, CREB, YAP65, HMGN1, HMGB1, NFAR, OCT-4, TEAD2, ATF-1, HMGN2, MSY2, and TBP) in germinal vesicle (GV) and metaphase II (MII) bovine oocytes and in two-, four-, eight-cell, and blastocyst stage embryos produced in vitro. Our results demonstrate that all genes examined can be grouped into five different categories according to their mRNA expression patterns at the developmental stages observed. To summarize, all transcription factors studied were present in pre-MZT embryos and the expression pattern of many of them suggest a potential role in MZT.

The RNA polymerase II core promoter

The events leading to transcription of eukaryotic protein-coding genes culminate in the positioning of RNA polymerase II at the correct initiation site. The core promoter, which can extend ~35 bp upstream and/or downstream of this site, plays a central role in regulating initiation. Specific DNA elements within the core promoter bind the factors that nucleate the assembly of a functional preinitiation complex and integrate stimulatory and repressive signals from factors bound at distal sites. Although core promoter structure was originally thought to be invariant, a remarkable degree of diversity has become apparent. This article reviews the structural and functional diversity of the RNA polymerase II core promoter.

Promoter-specific function of the TATA element in undifferentiated P19 cells

P19 embryonal carcinoma cells differentiate into neuronal cells when treated with retinoic acid (RA). To explore the importance of core promoter structures in the regulation of gene expression during neuronal differentiation, the activities of three classes of modified or unmodified model promoters (Spec2a, OtxE, and Ars) were compared in P19 cells before and after RA treatment. The Spec2a promoter was activated in undifferentiated cells specifically when the E-box was located at a proximal position, whereas the OtxE promoter was activated when the E-box was in a distal position. The Ars promoter was only slightly activated by this element. In addition, the TATA element reduced the level of activation provided by the E-box, but only when it was located in the Spec2a core promoter. These results indicate that the core promoter structure may govern, at least in part, the stage-specific expression of endogenous genes involved in the neuronal differentiation of P19 cells.

Gene expression in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos: use of suppression subtractive hybridization to identify oocyte- and embryo-specific genes

The paucity of biological material has inhibited identifying genes that are differentially expressed during mammalian oogenesis and preimplantation development. We report here the linear amplification of mRNA from small numbers of mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos to generate amounts of sense RNA that are sufficient for suppression subtractive hybridization. The resulting oocyte-specific and 8-cell-specific cDNA libraries were partially characterized, and the known oocyte-specific ZP1, ZP2, GDF-9, BMP15, and H1(oo) genes were found in the oocyte-specific cDNA library but not in the 8-cell-specific library. Further characterization of the subtracted oocyte and 8-cell embryo cDNA libraries should furnish a trove of information regarding temporal changes in gene expression during oogenesis and preimplantation development in the mouse.

Regulation of Zygotic Gene Activation in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo: Global Activation and Repression of Gene Expression1

Superimposed on the activation of the embryonic genome in the preimplantation mouse embryo is the formation of a transcriptionally repressive state during the two-cell stage. This repression appears mediated at the level of chromatin structure, because it is reversed by inducing histone hyperacetylation or inhibiting the second round of DNA replication. We report that of more than 200 amplicons analyzed by mRNA differential display, about 45% of them are repressed between the two-cell and four-cell stages. This repression is scored as either a decrease in amplicon expression that occurs between the two-cell and four-cell stages or on the ability of either trichostatin A (an inhibitor of histone deacetylases) or aphidicolin (an inhibitor of replicative DNA polymerases) to increase the level of amplicon expression. Results of this study also indicate that about 16% of the amplicons analyzed likely are novel genes whose sequence doesn't correspond to sequences in the current databases, whereas about 20% of the sequences expressed during this transition likely are repetitive sequences. Lastly, inducing histone hyperacetylation in the two-cell embryos inhibits cleavage to the four-cell stage. These results suggest that genome activation is global and relatively promiscuous and that a function of the transcriptionally repressive state is to dictate the appropriate profile of gene expression that is compatible with further development.

The tkNeo gene, but not the pgkPuro gene, can influence the ability of the beta-globin LCR to enhance and confer position-independent expression onto the beta-globin gene

Whether drug-selectable genes can influence expression of the beta-globin gene linked to its LCR was assessed here. With the tkNeo gene placed in cis and used to select transfected cells, the beta-globin gene was expressed fourfold lower when it was positioned upstream of the LCR rather than downstream. This difference did not occur when the pgkPuro gene replaced tkNeo. Moreover, the beta-globin gene situated upstream of the LCR was transcribed without position effects when it was cotransfected with a pgkPuro-containing plasmid, whereas cotransfection with a tkNeo plasmid gave measurable position effects. Previous results from transfected cells selected via a linked tkNeo gene suggested that the 3' end of the beta-globin gene has no impact on LCR-enhanced expression. Here, removal of the 3' end of the beta-globin gene resulted in lower and much more variable expression in both transgenic mice and cells cotransfected with pgkPuro. Together, the results suggest that tkNeo, but not pgkPuro, can strongly influence expression of the beta-globin gene linked to its LCR. The findings could partly explain why data on beta-globin gene regulation obtained from transfected cells have often not agreed with those obtained using transgenic mice. Hence, one must be careful in choosing a drug-selectable gene for cell transfection studies.

Regulation of gene expression at the beginning of mammalian development and the TEAD family of transcription factors

In mouse development, transcription is first detected in late 1-cell embryos, but translation of newly synthesized transcripts does not begin until the 2-cell stage. Thus, the onset of zygotic gene expression (ZGE) is regulated at the level of both transcription and translation. Chromatin-mediated repression is established after formation of a 2-cell embryo, concurrent with the developmental acquisition of enhancer function. The most effective enhancer in cleavage stage mouse embryos depends on DNA binding sites for TEF-1, the prototype for a family of transcription factors that share the same TEA DNA binding domain. Mice contain at least four, and perhaps five, genes with the same TEA DNA binding domain (mTEAD genes). Since mTEAD-2 is the only one expressed during the first 7 days of mouse development, it is most likely responsible for the TEAD transcription factor activity that first appears at the beginning of ZGE. All four mTEAD genes are expressed at later embryonic stages and in adult tissues; virtually every tissue expresses at least one family member, consistent with a critical role for TEAD proteins in either cell proliferation or differentiation. The 72-amino acid TEA DNA binding domains in mTEAD-2, 3, and 4 are approximately 99% homologous to the same domain in mTEAD-1, and all four proteins bind specifically to the same DNA sequences in vitro with a Kd value of 16-38 nM DNA. Since TEAD proteins appear to be involved in both activation and repression of different genes and do not appear to be functionally redundant, differential activity of TEAD proteins must result either from association with other proteins or from differential sensitivity to chromatin-packaged DNA binding sites.

Developmental change in TATA-box utilization during preimplantation mouse development

Activation of the embryonic genome during preimplantation mouse development is characterized by a marked reprogramming of gene expression that is essential for further development. Expression of the protein translation initiation factor eIF-1A gene is driven by a proximal TATA-containing promoter and a distal TATA-less promoter. Using specific amplification of cDNA ends that resolves transcripts derived from the TATA-less and TATA-containing promoters, we find that 70% of the eIF-1A transcripts are derived from the TATA-containing promoter in the fully-grown oocyte. Activation of the embryonic genome during the two-cell stage is accompanied by a change in promoter utilization such that only 25% of the transcripts are now derived from the TATA-containing promoter, i.e., 75% are derived from the TATA-less promoter. When one-cell embryos are cultured to the two-cell stage in the presence of alpha-amanitin, this change in transcript abundance is not observed, i.e., the distribution of transcripts is similar to that observed in the oocyte. By the blastocyst stage only 5% of the transcripts are generated from the TATA-containing promoter. If the change in TATA-box utilization for the eIF-1A reflects an underlying global change in TATA-box utilization, a dramatic change in promoter utilization may occur during preimplantation development such that TATA-less promoters are more efficiently utilized. Such a change in promoter utilization could contribute significantly to the reprogramming of gene expression that occurs during the maternal-to-zygotic transition.

Lack of enhancer function in mammals is unique to oocytes and fertilized eggs

Previous studies have shown that the lack of novel coactivator activity in mouse oocytes and one-cell embryos (fertilized eggs) renders them incapable of utilizing Gal4:VP16-dependent enhancers (distal elements) but not promoters (proximal elements) in regulating transcription. This coactivator activity first appears in two- to four-cell embryos coincident with the major activation of zygotic gene expression. Here we show that whereas oocytes and fertilized eggs could utilize Sp1-dependent promoters, they could not utilize Sp1-dependent enhancers, although they showed promoter repression, which is a requirement for delineating enhancer function. In contrast, both Sp1-dependent promoters and enhancers were functional in two- to four-cell embryos. Furthermore, the same embryonic stem cell mRNA that provided the coactivator activity for Gal4:VP16-dependent enhancer function also provided Sp1-dependent enhancer function in oocytes. Therefore, the coactivator activity appears to be a requirement for general enhancer function. To determine whether the absence of enhancer function is a unique property of oocytes or a general property of other terminally differentiated cells, transcription was examined in terminally differentiated hNT neurons and their precursors, undifferentiated NT2 stem cells. The results showed that both cell types could utilize enhancers and promoters. Thus, in mammals, the lack of enhancer function appears to be unique to oocytes and fertilized eggs, suggesting that it provides a safeguard against premature activation of genes prior to zygotic gene expression during development.

Molecular cloning and expression of the mouse translation initiation factor eIF-1A

Prior to determining the molecular basis for the transient increase in expression of eIF-1A during the 2-cell stage of the pre-implantation mouse embryo, we determined the sequence of full-length cDNA and defined properties of the genomic organization of the mouse eIF-1A gene. Northern blot analysis distinguishes three transcripts in mouse liver of 2.8, 2.2 and 1.9 kb in size. The three transcripts arise from initiation at two putative promoters separated by 627 bp. Initiation from the putative distal promoter yields both the 2.8 and 1.9 kb transcripts, in which the 1.9 kb transcript is generated by alternative splicing of 840 bp of intervening RNA. The putative distal promoter, which lacks both a TATA box and CCAAT box control elements but contains several GC-rich clusters, initiates transcription at two start sites that are separated by 30 bp. Thus, four transcripts are generated from the distal promoter. The putative proximal promoter that directs transcription of a single 2.2 kb mRNA is preceded by a TATA box element that binds TBP. Each of the promoters is used by the pre-implantation mouse embryo, since we have been able to amplify selectively each of the five individual eIF-1A transcripts initiated from each promoter and start site in the 2-cell mouse embryo.

Maximal activity of an erythroid-specific enhancer requires the presence of specific protein binding sites in linked promoters

High level expression of many eukaryotic genes is achieved through the action of distal regulatory sequences or enhancers. We have utilized the interaction between the erythroid-specific enhancer in hypersensitivity site 2 (HS2) of the human beta-globin locus control region and the globin gene promoters as a model to elucidate the mechanisms governing promoter/enhancer interactions. HS2 contains a 400-base pair core element consisting of tandem AP1/NF-E2 motifs flanked by binding sites for multiple ubiquitous and erythroid-specific factors. We have compared the enhancer activity of this core element with a synthetic enhancer lacking the factor binding sites flanking the AP1/NF-E2 motif (HS2(M)). In fetal/erythroid K562 cells, enhancement of a linked gamma-promoter was significantly greater with wild-type HS2 than with HS2(M). In contrast, the increase in beta-promoter activity in these cells was equivalent with either enhancer fragment. Truncation of the binding site for the fetal/erythroid-specific stage selector protein in the gamma-promoter abolished the additional enhancer activity of HS2. Similarly, insertion of the stage selector protein site into the beta-promoter boosted enhancer activity observed with HS2 but not HS2(M). In adult erythroid MEL cells, enhancement of a linked beta-promoter was significantly greater with HS2 than with HS2(M). This effect was dependent on the binding of the adult stage-specific factor, erythroid Kruppel-like factor, to the beta-promoter. Taken together, this data suggests that the stage-specific factors binding the proximal globin promoters and the factors flanking the AP1/NF-E2 motif of HS2 act in synergy.

Evidence for the separate regulation of the human papillomavirus type 11 E7 and E6 promoters by Viral cis sequences near the E6 promoter

The human papillomavirus type 11 (HPV-11) E7 protein can modulate host cell functions and is required for papilloma formation, but little is known concerning the regulation of its expression. This study was designed to determine whether the viral upstream regulatory region controlled expression from the E7 promoter and whether cis sequences differentially regulated E6 and E7 expression in laryngeal mucosal keratinocytes, the natural target cells for this virus. Reporter constructs were designed to study expression of the luciferase gene from the HPV-11 E7 promoter in its natural position downstream of a functional E6 promoter. E7 expression, like E6 expression, required upstream regulatory sequences. However, E7 expression was less sensitive to repression by viral E2 protein and to mutation of the Spl binding site adjacent to the E2 binding site. Moreover, there was differential sensitivity of the two promoters to mutation of the E6 TATA box, with E7 expression more affected than E6 expression. These findings show that, in the normal host cells for this virus, the E6 and E7 promoters can be independently regulated by the cis regulatory region adjacent to the E6 promoter.

The epithelial cell default-phenotype hypothesis and its implications for cancer

The expression of epithelial cell adhesion and cytoskeletal genes is orchestrated by an apparently unique set of rules. No tissue-specific transactivator proteins have been found to drive them; only ubiquitous factors are utilized. In non-epithelial cells, they are actively repressed. Moreover, it was recently found that a single protein (adenovirus E1a) coordinately represses non-epithelial genes while inducing epithelial genes. A simple model is offered to explain how epithelial gene expression is coordinated. Under this model, the epithelial cell gene expression program is a transcriptional 'default'; that is, it occurs in the absence of tissue-specific transactivation. Conversion to this default requires only that mesenchymal transactivators are not expressed, or that central 'integrator' proteins are inactive. In their absence, mesenchymal gene expression cannot occur. Moreover, because the repressors cease to be expressed, the epithelial genes are induced. Oncogenes generally cause the breakdown of the epithelial phenotype--generating carcinomas--so genes such as E1a that cause epithelial conversion may prove useful for both understanding and controlling cancer.

Transcription factor mTEAD-2 is selectively expressed at the beginning of zygotic gene expression in the mouse

mTEF-1 is the prototype of a family of mouse transcription factors that share the same TEA DNA binding domain (mTEAD genes) and are widely expressed in adult tissues. At least one member of this family is expressed at the beginning of mouse development, because mTEAD transcription factor activity was not detected in oocytes, but first appeared at the 2-cell stage in development, concomitant with the onset of zygotic gene expression. Since embryos survive until day 11 in the absence of mTEAD-1 (TEF-1), another family member likely accounts for this activity. Screening an EC cell cDNA library yielded mTEAD-1, 2 and 3 genes. RT-PCR detected RNA from all three of these genes in oocytes, but upon fertilization, mTEAD-1 and 3 mRNAs disappeared. mTEAD-2 mRNA, initially present at approx. 5,000 copies per egg, decreased to approx. 2,000 copies in 2-cell embryos before accumulating to approx. 100,000 copies in blastocysts, consistent with degradation of maternal mTEAD mRNAs followed by selective transcription of mTEAD-2 from the zygotic genome. In situ hybridization did not detect mTEAD RNA in oocytes, and only mTEAD-2 was detected in day-7 embryos. Northern analysis detected all three RNAs at varying levels in day-9 embryos and in various adult tissues. A fourth mTEAD gene, recently cloned from a myotube cDNA library, was not detected by RT-PCR in either oocytes or preimplantation embryos. Together, these results reveal that mTEAD-2 is selectively expressed for the first 7 days of embryonic development, and is therefore most likely responsible for the mTEAD transcription factor activity that appears upon zygotic gene activation.

The transcriptional activity of a muscle-specific promoter depends critically on the structure of the TATA element and its binding protein

We have previously characterized the proximal promoter of the mouse IIB myosin heavy chain (MyHC) gene, which is expressed only in fast-contracting glycolytic skeletal muscle fibers. We show here that the substitution into this promoter of a non-canonical TATA sequence from the IgH gene results in inactivity in muscle cells, even though TATA-binding protein (TBP) can bind strongly to this mutated promoter. Chemical foot-printing data show, however, that TBP makes different DNA contacts on this heterologous TATA sequence. The inactivity of such a non-canonical TATA motif in the IIB promoter context appears to be caused by a non-functional conformation of the bound TBP-DNA complex that is incapable of sustaining transcription. The conclusions imply that the precise sequence of the promoter TATA motif needs to be matched with the specific functional class of upstream activator proteins present in a given cell type in order for the gene to be transcriptionally active.

A unique role for enhancers is revealed during early mouse development

Transcription and replication of genes in mammalian cells always requires a promoter or replication origin, respectively, but the ability of enhancers to stimulate these regulatory elements and the interactions that mediate this stimulation are developmentally acquired. The primary function of enhancers is to prevent repression, which appears to result from particular components of chromatin structure. Factors responsible for this repression are present in the maternal nucleus of oocytes and its descendant, the maternal pronucleus of mouse 1-cell embryos and in mouse 2-cell embryos, but are absent in the paternal pronucleus. Thus, enhancers are not needed to achieve efficient transcription and replication in paternal pronuclei. However, enhancers, even in the presence of their specific activation protein, are inactive prior to formation of a 2-cell embryo, suggesting that a coactivator essential for enhancer function is not available until zygotic gene expression begins. Furthermore, enhancer stimulation of transcription appears to be mediated through a promoter transcription factor, but this interaction can change as cells undergo differentiation, switching from a TATA-box independent to a TATA-box dependent mode.

Regulation of gene expression at the beginning of mammalian development

The maternal to zygotic transition can be viewed as a cascade of events that begins when fertilization triggers the zygotic clock that delays early ZGA until formation of a 2-cell embryo. Early ZGA, in turn, appears to be required for expression of late ZGA, and late ZGA is required to form a 4-cell embryo. ZGA in mammals is a time-dependent mechanism rather than a cell cycle-dependent mechanism that delays both transcription and translation of nascent transcripts. Thus, zygotic gene transcripts appear to be handled differently than maternal mRNA, a phenomenon also observed in Xenopus (55). The length of this delay is species-dependent, occurring at the 2-cell stage in mice, the 4-8-cell stage in cows and humans, and the 8-16-cell stage in sheep and rabbits (4). However, concurrent with formation of a 2-cell embryo in the mouse and rabbit (47,56), perhaps in all mammals, a general chromatin-mediated repression of promoter activity appears. Repression factors are inherited by the maternal pronucleus from the oocyte but are absent in the paternal pronucleus and not available until sometime during the transition from a late 1-cell to a 2-cell embryo. This means that paternally inherited genes are exposed to a different environment in fertilized eggs than are maternally inherited genes, a situation that could contribute to genomic imprinting. Chromatin-mediated repression of promoter activity prior to ZGA is similar to what is observed during Xenopus embryogenesis (31,32) and ensures that genes are not expressed until the appropriate time in development when positive acting factors, such as enhancers, can relieve this repression. The ability to use enhancers appears to depend on the acquisition of specific co-activators at the 2-cell stage in mice and perhaps later in other mammals (47,56), concurrent with ZGA. Even then, the mechanism by which enhancers communicate with promoters changes during development (Fig. 2), providing an opportunity for enhancer-mediated stimulating of TATA-less promoters (e.g. housekeeping genes) early during development while eliminating this mechanism later during development.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)