The insert region of Rac1 is essential for membrane ruffling but not cellular transformation

Crystal Structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rho1 Reveals Its Evolutionary Relationship with Other Rho GTPases

Simple Summary

Rho family of proteins are involved in cytoskeletal organization, cell mobility and polarity, and are implicated in cancer morphogenesis. The structure and function of the Rho homologs from higher-level organisms are well studied, but not from the lower-level organisms. Such as over 95% of the known structures of Rho GTPases are from higher-order mammalian organisms, with only three structures of Rho homologs reported to date from lower-level, single-celled organisms. In this paper we report the crystal structure of Rho1 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, also called fission yeast (SpRho1), in complex with GDP in the presence of Mg²⁺ at 2.63-Å resolution, to broaden our understanding of Rho homologs in lower-level organisms. Although the overall structure is similar to that of known Rho homologs, we observed subtle differences at the Switch I and II regions, in β2 and β3, and in the Rho insert domain and loop from Phe107 to Pro112. Combined with literature and sequence analyses, we suggest that the Switch regions and Rho insert domain may contribute to downstream kinase activation in different species through their interactions with different effectors and regulators; and the conservation and divergence of Rho GTPases among difference species and provide evolutionary insight for SpRho1. While many studies have reported the evolutionary development of Rho GTPases based on their amino acid sequences, the present study, for the first time, explores these evolutionary aspects based on structure. Our analysis indicates that SpRho is evolutionarily closer to HsRhoC than HsRhoA, as previously believed.

Abstract

The Rho protein, a homolog of Ras, is a member of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases. Rho family proteins are involved in cytoskeletal organization, cell mobility, and polarity, and are implicated in cancer morphogenesis. Although Rho homologs from higher-order mammalian organisms are well studied, there are few studies examining Rho proteins in lower-level single-celled organisms. Here, we report on the crystal structure of Rho1 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (SpRho1) in complex with GDP in the presence of Mg²⁺ at a 2.78 Å resolution. The overall structure is similar to that of known Rho homologs, including human RhoA, human RhoC, and Aspergillus fumigatus Rho1 (AfRho1), with some exceptions. We observed subtle differences at the Switch I and II regions, in β2 and β3, and in the Rho insert domain and loop from Phe107 to Pro112. Our analysis suggests that SpRho is evolutionarily closer to HsRhoC than HsRhoA, as previously believed.

CDC42-IQGAP Interactions Scrutinized: New Insights into the Binding Properties of the GAP-Related Domain

The IQ motif-containing GTPase-activating protein (IQGAP) family composes of three highly-related and evolutionarily conserved paralogs (IQGAP1, IQGAP2 and IQGAP3), which fine tune as scaffolding proteins numerous fundamental cellular processes. IQGAP1 is described as an effector of CDC42, although its effector function yet re-mains unclear. Biophysical, biochemical and molecular dynamic simulation studies have proposed that IQGAP RASGAP-related domains (GRDs) bind to the switch regions and the insert helix of CDC42 in a GTP-dependent manner. Our kinetic and equilibrium studies have shown that IQGAP1 GRD binds, in contrast to its C-terminal 794 amino acids (called C794), CDC42 in a nucleotide-independent manner indicating a binding outside the switch regions. To resolve this discrepancy and move beyond the one-sided view of GRD, we carried out affinity measurements and a systematic mutational analysis of the interfacing residues between GRD and CDC42 based on the crystal structure of the IQGAP2 GRD-CDC42Q61L GTP complex. We determined a 100-fold lower affinity of the GRD1 of IQGAP1 and of GRD2 of IQGAP2 for CDC42 mGppNHp in comparison to C794/C795 proteins. Moreover, partial and major mutation of CDC42 switch regions substantially affected C794/C795 binding but only a little GRD1 and remarkably not at all the GRD2 binding. However, we clearly showed that GRD2 contributes to the overall affinity of C795 by using a 11 amino acid mutated GRD variant. Furthermore, the GRD1 binding to the CDC42 was abolished using specific point mutations within the insert helix of CDC42 clearly supporting the notion that CDC42 binding site(s) of IQGAP GRD lies outside the switch regions among others in the insert helix. Collectively, this study provides further evidence for a mechanistic framework model that is based on a multi-step binding process, in which IQGAP GRD might act as a ‘scaffolding domain’ by binding CDC42 irrespective of its nucleotide-bound forms, followed by other IQGAP domains downstream of GRD that act as an effector domain and is in charge for a GTP-dependent interaction with CDC42.

Structural basis for selective AMPylation of Rac-subfamily GTPases by Bartonella effector protein 1 (Bep1)

Mammalian cells regulate diverse cellular processes in response to extracellular cues. Small GTPases of the Rho family act as molecular switches to rapidly regulate discrete cellular activities, such as cytoskeletal dynamics, cell movement, and innate immune responses. Numerous bacterial virulence factors modulate the function of Rho-family GTPases and thereby manipulate intracellular signaling. For many of these virulence factors we have gained detailed understanding how they covalently modify individual Rho-family GTPases to reprogram their activities; however, their mechanisms of selective targeting of distinct subsets of Rho-family GTPases remained elusive. Using a combination of structural biology and biochemistry, we demonstrate for the effector protein Bep1 exclusive specificity for Rac-subfamily GTPases and propose the underlying mechanism of target selectivity.

Small GTPases of the Ras-homology (Rho) family are conserved molecular switches that control fundamental cellular activities in eukaryotic cells. As such, they are targeted by numerous bacterial toxins and effector proteins, which have been intensively investigated regarding their biochemical activities and discrete target spectra; however, the molecular mechanism of target selectivity has remained largely elusive. Here we report a bacterial effector protein that selectively targets members of the Rac subfamily in the Rho family of small GTPases but none in the closely related Cdc42 or RhoA subfamilies. This exquisite target selectivity of the FIC domain AMP-transferase Bep1 from Bartonella rochalimae is based on electrostatic interactions with a subfamily-specific pair of residues in the nucleotide-binding G4 motif and the Rho insert helix. Residue substitutions at the identified positions in Cdc42 enable modification by Bep1, while corresponding Cdc42-like substitutions in Rac1 greatly diminish modification. Our study establishes a structural understanding of target selectivity toward Rac-subfamily GTPases and provides a highly selective tool for their functional analysis.

Non-visual arrestins regulate the focal adhesion formation via small GTPases RhoA and Rac1 independently of GPCRs

Arrestins recruit a variety of signaling proteins to active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors in the plasma membrane and to the cytoskeleton. Loss of arrestins leads to decreased cell migration, altered cell shape, and an increase in focal adhesions. Small GTPases of the Rho family are molecular switches that regulate actin cytoskeleton and affect a variety of dynamic cellular functions including cell migration and cell morphology. Here we show that non-visual arrestins differentially regulate RhoA and Rac1 activity to promote cell spreading via actin reorganization, and focal adhesion formation via two distinct mechanisms. Arrestins regulate these small GTPases independently of G-protein-coupled receptor activation.

Oxygen radicals elicit paralysis and collapse of spinal cord neuron growth cones upon exposure to proinflammatory cytokines

A persistent inflammatory and oxidative stress is a hallmark of most chronic CNS pathologies (Alzheimer's (ALS)) as well as the aging CNS orchestrated by the proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β). Loss of the integrity and plasticity of neuronal morphology and connectivity comprises an early step in neuronal degeneration and ultimate decline of cognitive function. We examined in vitro whether TNFα or IL-1β impaired morphology and motility of growth cones in spinal cord neuron cultures. TNFα and IL-1β paralyzed growth cone motility and induced growth cone collapse in a dose-dependent manner reflected by complete attenuation of neurite outgrowth. Scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) or inhibiting NADPH oxidase activity rescued loss of neuronal motility and morphology. TNFα and IL-1β provoked rapid, NOX-mediated generation of ROS in advancing growth cones, which preceded paralysis of motility and collapse of morphology. Increases in ROS intermediates were accompanied by an aberrant, nonproductive reorganization of actin filaments. These findings suggest that NADPH oxidase serves as a pivotal source of oxidative stress in neurons and together with disruption of actin filament reorganization contributes to the progressive degeneration of neuronal morphology in the diseased or aging CNS.

p104 binds to Rac1 and reduces its activity during myotube differentiation of C2C12 cell

The p104 protein inhibits cellular proliferation when overexpressed in NIH3T3 cells and has been shown to associate with p85α, Grb2, and PLCγ1. In order to isolate other proteins that interact with p104, yeast two-hybrid screening was performed. Rac1 was identified as a binding partner of p104 and the interaction between p104 and Rac1 was confirmed by immunoprecipitation. Using a glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assay with various p104 fragments, the 814–848 amino acid residue at the carboxyl-terminal region of p104 was identified as the key component to interact with Rac1. The CrkII which is involved in the Rac1-mediated cellular response was also found to interact with p104 protein. NIH3T3 cells which overexpressed p104 showed a decrease of Rac1 activity. However, neither the proline-rich domain mutant, which is unable to interact with CrkII, nor the carboxy-terminal deletion mutant could attenuate Rac1 activity. During the differentiation of myoblasts, the amount of p104 protein as well as transcript level was increased. The overexpression of p104 enhanced myotube differentiation, whereas siRNA of p104 reversed this process. In this process, more Rac1 and CrkII were bound to increased p104. Based on these results, we conclude that p104 is involved in muscle cell differentiation by modulating the Rac1 activity.

The Rac1 hypervariable region in targeting and signaling: a tail of many stories

Cellular signaling by small GTPases is critically dependent on proper spatio-temporal orchestration of activation and output. In addition to their core G (guanine nucleotide binding)-domain, small GTPases comprise a hypervariable region (HVR) and a lipid anchor that are generally accepted to control subcellullar localization. The HVR encodes in many small GTPases a polybasic region (PBR) that permits charge-mediated association to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane or to intracellular organelles. Over the past 15-20 years, evidence has accumulated for specific protein-protein interactions, mediated by the HVR, that control both targeting and signaling specificity of small GTPases. Using the RhoGTPase Rac1 as a paradigm we here review a series of protein partners that require the Rac1 HVR for association and that control various aspects of localized Rac1 signaling. Some of these proteins represent Rac1 activators, whereas others mediate Rac1 inactivation and degradation and yet others potentiate Rac1 downstream signaling. Finally, evidence is discussed which shows that the HVR of Rac1 also contributes to effector interactions, co-operating with the N-terminal effector domain. The complexity of localized Rac1 signaling, reviewed here, is most likely exemplary for many other small GTPases as well, representing a challenge to identify and define similar mechanisms controlling the specific signaling induced by small GTPases.

Redox regulation of Ras and Rho GTPases: mechanism and function

SIGNIFICANCE

Oxidation and reduction events are critical to physiological and pathological processes and are highly regulated. Herein, we present evidence for the role of Ras and Rho GTPases in controlling these events and the unique underlying mechanisms. Evidence for redox regulation of Ras GTPases that contain a redox-sensitive cysteine (X) in the conserved NKXD motif is presented, and a growing consensus supports regulation by a thiyl radical-mediated oxidation mechanism. We also discuss the debate within the literature regarding whether 2e(-) oxidation mechanisms also regulate Ras GTPase activity.

RECENT ADVANCES

We examine the increasing in vitro and cell-based data supporting oxidant-mediated activation of Rho GTPases that contain a redox-sensitive cysteine at the end of the conserved phosphoryl-binding loop (p-loop) motif (GXXXXG[S/T]C). While this motif is distinct from Ras, these data suggest a similar 1e(-) oxidation-mediated activation mechanism.

CRITICAL ISSUES

We also review the data showing that the unique p-loop placement of the redox-sensitive cysteine in Rho GTPases supports activation by 2e(-) cysteine oxidation. Finally, we examine the role that Ras and Rho GTPases play in controlling key oxidant-regulating enzymes in the cell, and we speculate on a feedback mechanism.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Given that these GTPases and redox-regulating enzymes are involved in multiple physiological and pathological processes, we discuss future experiments that may clarify the interplay between them.

Proinflammatory cytokines provoke oxidative damage to actin in neuronal cells mediated by Rac1 and NADPH oxidase

The proinflammatory cytokines TNFalpha and Il-1beta orchestrate the progression of CNS inflammation, which substantially contributes to neurodegeneration in many CNS pathologies. TNFalpha and Il-1beta stimulate actin filament reorganization in non-neuronal cells often accompanied by the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Actin filament dynamics is vital for cellular plasticity, mitochondrial function, and gene expression despite being highly susceptible to oxidative damage. We demonstrated that, in neuronal cells, TNFalpha and Il-1beta stimulate a transient, redox-dependent reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton into lamellipodia under the regulation of Rac1 and a neuronal NADPH oxidase as the source of ROS. The persistent presence of intracellular ROS provoked oxidative damage (carbonylation) to actin coinciding with the loss of lamellipodia and arrest of cellular plasticity. Inhibition of NADPH oxidase activity or Rac1 abolished the adverse effects of cytokines. These findings suggest that oxidative damage to the neuronal actin cytoskeleton could represent a key step in CNS neurodegeneration.

Specificity of interactions between mDia isoforms and Rho proteins

Formins are key regulators of actin nucleation and polymerization. They contain formin homology 1 (FH1) and 2 (FH2) domains as the catalytic machinery for the formation of linear actin cables. A subclass of formins constitutes the Diaphanous-related formins, members of which are regulated by the binding of a small GTP-binding protein of the Rho subfamily. Binding of these molecular switch proteins to the regulatory N-terminal mDia(N), including the GTPase-binding domain, leads to the release of auto-inhibition. From the three mDia isoforms, mDia1 is activated only by Rho (RhoA, -B, and -C), in contrast to mDia2 and -3, which is also activated by Rac and Cdc42. Little is known about the determinants of specificity. Here we report on the interactions of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 with mDia1 and an mDia1 mutant (mDia(N)-Thr-Ser-His (TSH)), which based on structural information should mimic mDia2 and -3. Specificity is analyzed by biochemical studies and a structural analysis of a complex between Cdc42.Gpp(NH)p and mDia(N)-TSH. A triple NNN motif in mDia1 (amino acids 164-166), corresponding to the TSH motif in mDia2/3 (amino acids 183-185 and 190-192), and the epitope interacting with the Rho insert helix are essential for high affinity binding. The triple N motif of mDia1 allows tight interaction with Rho because of the presence of Phe-106, whereas the corresponding His-104 in Rac and Cdc42 forms a complementary interface with the TSH motif in mDia2/3. We also show that the F106H and H104F mutations drastically alter the affinities and thermodynamics of mDia interactions.

The IQGAP1-Rac1 and IQGAP1-Cdc42 interactions: interfaces differ between the complexes

IQGAP1 contains a domain related to the catalytic portion of the GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for the Ras small G proteins, yet it has no RasGAP activity and binds to the Rho family small G proteins Cdc42 and Rac1. It is thought that IQGAP1 is an effector of Rac1 and Cdc42, regulating cell-cell adhesion through the E-cadherin-catenin complex, which controls formation and maintenance of adherens junctions. This study investigates the binding interfaces of the Rac1-IQGAP1 and Cdc42-IQGAP1 complexes. We mutated Rac1 and Cdc42 and measured the effects of mutations on their affinity for IQGAP1. We have identified similarities and differences in the relative importance of residues used by Rac1 and Cdc42 to bind IQGAP1. Furthermore, the residues involved in the complexes formed with IQGAP1 differ from those formed with other effector proteins and GAPs. Relatively few mutations in switch I of Cdc42 or Rac1 affect IQGAP1 binding; only mutations in residues 32 and 36 significantly decrease affinity for IQGAP1. Switch II mutations also affect binding to IQGAP1 although the effects differ between Rac1 and Cdc42; mutation of either Asp-63, Arg-68, or Leu-70 abrogate Rac1 binding, whereas no switch II mutations affect Cdc42 binding to IQGAP1. The Rho family "insert loop" does not contribute to the binding affinity of Rac1/Cdc42 for IQGAP1. We also present thermodynamic data pertaining to the Rac1/Cdc42-RhoGAP complexes. Switch II contributes a large portion of the total binding energy to these complexes, whereas switch I mutations also affect binding. In addition we identify "cold spots" in the Rac1/Cdc42-RhoGAP/IQGAP1 interfaces. Competition data reveal that the binding sites for IQGAP1 and RhoGAP on the small G proteins overlap only partially. Overall, the data presented here suggest that, despite their 71% identity, Cdc42 and Rac1 appear to have only partially overlapping binding sites on IQGAP1, and each uses different determinants to achieve high affinity binding.

Rac3-Mediated Transformation Requires Multiple Effector Pathways

Our initial characterization of Rac3, a close relative of the small GTPase Rac1, established its ability to promote membrane ruffling, transformation, and activation of c-jun transcriptional activity. The finding that Rac3 is transforming, and its similarity to Rac1, a protein that has a well-established connection to many processes important for cancer progression, prompted further investigation into Rac3 transformation. We used effector domain mutants (EDMs) to explore the relationship among Rac signaling, transformation, and effector usage. All Rac3 EDMs tested (N26D, F37L, Y40C, and N43D) retained the ability to promote membrane ruffling and focus formation. In contrast, only the N43D mutant promoted anchorage independence. This differs from Rac1, where both N26D and N43D mutants were impaired in both types of transformation. To learn more about the signaling pathways involved, we did luciferase reporter assays and glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays for effector binding. We found evidence for a functional link between activation of phospholipase Cbeta2 by Rac3 and signaling to the serum response factor (SRF). Surprisingly, we also found that Rac3 binds poorly to the known Rac1 effectors mixed lineage kinases 2 and 3 (MLK2 and MLK3). Transcription of cyclin D1 was the only pathway that correlated with growth in soft agar. Our experiments show that activation of membrane ruffling and transcriptional activation of c-jun, SRF, or E2F are not sufficient to promote anchorage-independent growth mediated by Rac3. Instead, multiple effector pathways are required for Rac3 transformation, and these overlap partially but not completely with those used by Rac1.

Models of the cooperative mechanism for Rho effector recognition: implications for RhoA-mediated effector activation

Activated GTPases of the Rho family regulate a spectrum of functionally diverse downstream effectors, initiating a network of signal transduction pathways by interaction and activation of effector proteins. Although effectors are defined as proteins that selectively bind the GTP-bound state of the small GTPases, there have been also several indications for a nucleotide-independent binding mode. By characterizing the molecular mechanism of RhoA interaction with its effectors, we have determined the equilibrium dissociation constants of several Rho-binding domains of three different effector proteins (Rhotekin, ROCKI/ROK beta/p160ROCK, PRK1/PKNalpha where ROK is RhoA-binding kinase) for both RhoA.GDP and RhoA.GTP using fluorescence spectroscopy. In addition, we have identified two novel Rho-interacting domains in ROCKI, which bind RhoA with high affinity but not Cdc42 or Rac1. Our results, together with recent structural data, support the notion of multiple effector-binding sites in RhoA and strongly indicate a cooperative binding mechanism for PRK1 and ROCKI that may be the molecular basis of Rho-mediated effector activation.

Isotype-specific Degradation of Rac Activated by the Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1

The cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 (CNF1) from Escherichia coli activates members of the Rho family by deamidation of glutamine 61/63. Because this amino acid is crucial for GTP hydrolysis, deamidation of glutamine 61/63 results in constitutively active Rho proteins. Recently, it was shown that the level of CNF1-activated Rac is rapidly diminished in CNF1-treated cells by proteolytic degradation. Here, we studied the requirements for CNF1-induced Rac degradation. By overexpressing His-tagged activated Rac mutants we show that constitutive activation is necessary for degradation of Rac. However, permanent activation is not sufficient for degradation, because Rac that is constitutively activated by transamidation at glutamine 61 by the Bordetella dermonecrotic toxin is not degraded. Overexpression of His-tagged Rac mutants deficient in interaction with GTPase-activating protein (Rac(N92D) and Rac(Y64H)) and guanosine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (Rac(H103E)) were degraded after activation by CNF1, whereas Rac(Y40C), which is not able to interact with CRIB domain effectors or plenty of SH3, was not degraded. Isoprenylation and the presence of a putative mitotic destruction box are essential for CNF-induced degradation. In contrast to Rac1, Rac2, and Rac3 were not degraded following constitutive activation by CNF1. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we defined the polybasic region and amino acids 90, 107, 147, and 151 as responsible for isotype-specific degradation.

GTPases and reactive oxygen species: switches for killing and signaling

In neutrophils and other phagocytic cells, the small GTPase Rac is an essential regulator of a multi-component NADPH oxidase that produces high levels of superoxide, which kills invading pathogens. In many other cell types, Rac and newly discovered relatives of the neutrophil burst oxidase and its subunits have been found associated with production of reactive oxygen species, implicating superoxide production in a wide range of cellular processes not related to host defense. Although the precise role played by Rac in the regulation of these novel oxidases is not known, Rac does control the cellular redox state. Through these pro-oxidant mechanisms, Rac and the novel oxidases modify gene expression, cell proliferation, adhesion and many cell-specific functions.

Molecular Basis for Rho GTPase Signaling Specificity

There is now considerable evidence for the involvement of aberrant Rho GTPase activation in breast cancer development. Like Ras, Rho GTPases function as signaling nodes regulated by diverse extracellular stimuli. Rho GTPase activation is facilitated by multiple regulatory proteins, in particular guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) such as Dbl family proteins. Activated Rho GTPases in turn interact with and regulate a spectrum of functionally diverse downstream effectors, initiating a network of cytoplasmic and nuclear signaling cascades. Thus, Rho GTPases represent points of signaling convergence as well as relay switches that disseminate signaling divergence. In this review, we highlight issues relating to the structural basis by which Dbl family GEFs facilitate signaling convergence and Rho GTPase activation, and how Rho GTPases promote signal dissemination through downstream effectors.

The HIV-1 Nef protein and phagocyte NADPH oxidase activation

Nef, a multifunctional HIV protein, activates the Vav/Rac/p21-activated kinase (PAK) signaling pathway. Given the potential role of this pathway in the activation of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase, we have investigated the effect of the HIV-1 Nef protein on the phagocyte respiratory burst. Microglia (cell line and primary culture) were transduced with lentiviral expression vectors. Expression of Nef did not activate the NADPH oxidase by itself but led to a massive enhancement of the responses to a variety of stimuli (Ca(2+) ionophore, formyl peptide, endotoxin). These effects were not caused by up-regulation of phagocyte NADPH oxidase subunits. Nef mutants lacking motifs involved in the interaction with Vav and PAK failed to reproduce the effects of wild type Nef, suggesting a role for the Vav/Rac/PAK signaling pathway. The following results suggest a key role for Rac in the priming effect of Nef. (i) Inactivation of Rac by Clostridium difficile toxin B abolished the Nef effect. (ii) The fraction of activated Rac1 was increased in Nef-transduced cells, and (iii) the dominant positive Rac1(V12) mutant mimicked the effect of Nef. These results are to our knowledge the first analysis of the effect of Rac activation on the NADPH oxidase in intact phagocytes. Rac activation is not sufficient to stimulate the phagocyte NADPH oxidase; however, it markedly enhances the NADPH oxidase response to other stimuli.

Current molecular models for NADPH oxidase regulation by Rac GTPase

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been increasingly recognized as important components of cell signaling in addition to their well-established roles in host defense. The formation of ROS in phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells involves membrane-localized and Rac guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-regulated reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase(s). We discuss here the current molecular models for Rac GTPase action in the control of the phagocytic leukocyte NADPH oxidase. As a mechanistically detailed example of Rac GTPase signaling, the NADPH oxidase provides a potential paradigm for signaling by Rho family GTPases in general.

Rho GTPases in transformation and metastasis

During the development and progression of human cancer, cells undergo numerous changes in morphology, proliferation, and transcriptional profile. Over the past couple of decades there have been intense efforts to understand the molecular mechanisms involved, and members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases have emerged as important players. Mutated versions of the Ras genes were first identified in human cancers some 20 years ago, but more recently, the Rho branch of the family has been receiving increased attention. In addition to the experimental evidence implicating Rho GTPase signaling in promoting malignant transformation, genetic analysis of human cancers has now revealed a few examples of direct alterations in the genes encoding regulators of Rho GTPases. In this review, we discuss the evidence implicating Rho GTPases in transformation and metastasis, as well as the progress made toward identifying their biochemical mechanism of action.

Distinct role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Rho family GTPases in Vav3-induced cell transformation, cell motility, and morphological changes

Vav3 is a member of the Vav family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the Rho family GTPases. Deleting the N-terminal calponin homology (CH) domain to generate Vav3-(5-10) or deleting both the CH and the acidic domain to generate Vav3-(6-10) results in activating the transforming potential of Vav3. Expression of either the full-length Vav3 or its truncation mutants led to activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and Stat3. We investigated the requirement of these signaling molecules for Vav3-induced focus formation and found that PI3K and its downstream signaling molecules, Akt and p70 S6 kinase, are required, albeit to varying degrees. Inhibition of PI3K had a more dramatic effect than inhibition of MAPK on Vav3-(6-10)-induced focus formation. Activated PI3K enhanced the focus-forming activity of Vav3-(6-10). Wild type FAK but not Y397F mutant FAK enhanced Vav3-(6-10)-induced focus formation. Dominant negative (dn) mutant of Stat3 resulted in a 60% inhibition of the focus-forming activity of Vav3-(6-10). Moreover, Rac1, RhoA, and to a lesser extent, Cdc42, are important for Vav3-(6-10)-induced focus formation. Constitutively activated (ca) Rac synergizes with Vav3-(6-10) in focus formation. This synergy requires signaling via Rho-associated kinase (ROK) and p21-activated kinase (PAK), downstream effectors of Rac. Consistently, a ca PAK mutant enhanced, whereas a dn PAK mutant inhibited the focus-forming ability of Vav3-(6-10). Despite having potent focus-forming ability, Vav3-(6-10) has very weak colony-forming ability. This colony-forming ability of Vav3-(6-10) can be enhanced dramatically by co-expressing an activated PI3K and to some extent by co-expressing an activated PAK mutant or c-Myc. Interestingly, inhibition of PI3K and MAPK had no effect on the ability of either wild type or Vav3-(6-10) to induce cytoskeletal changes including formation of lamellipodia and filopodia in NIH 3T3 cells. Over expression of Vav3 or Vav3-(6-10) resulted in an enhancement of cell motility. This enhancement was dependent on PI3K, Rac1, and Cdc42 but not on Rho. Overall, our results show that signaling pathways of PI3K, MAPK, and Rho family GTPases are differentially required for Vav3-induced focus formation, colony formation, morphological changes, and cell motility.

The insert region of RhoA is essential for Rho kinase activation and cellular transformation

RhoA is involved in multiple cellular processes, including cytoskeletal organization, gene expression, and transformation. These processes are mediated by a variety of downstream effector proteins. However, which effectors are involved in cellular transformation and how these proteins are activated following interaction with Rho remains to be established. A unique feature that distinguishes the Rho family from other Ras-related GTPases is the insert region, which may confer Rho-specific signaling events. Here we report that deletion of the insert region does not result in impaired effector binding. Instead, this insert deletion mutant (RhoDeltaRas, in which the insert helix has been replaced with loop 8 of Ras) acted in a dominant inhibitory fashion to block RhoA-induced transformation. Since RhoDeltaRas failed to promote stress fiber formation, we examined the ability of this mutant to bind to and subsequently activate Rho kinase. Surprisingly, RhoDeltaRas-GTP coprecipitated with Rho kinase but failed to activate it in vivo. These data suggested that the insert domain is not required for Rho kinase binding but plays a role in its activation. The constitutively active catalytic domain of Rho kinase did not promote focus formation alone or in the presence of Raf(340D) but cooperated with RhoDeltaRas to induce cellular transformation. This suggests that Rho kinase needs to cooperate with additional Rho effectors to promote transformation. Further, the Rho kinase catalytic domain reversed the inhibitory effect of RhoDeltaRas on Rho-induced transformation, suggesting that one of the downstream targets of Rho-induced transformation abrogated by RhoDeltaRas is indeed Rho kinase. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the insert region of RhoA is required for Rho kinase activation but not for binding and that this kinase activity is required to induce morphologic transformation of NIH 3T3 cells.