Species-specific rDNA transcription is due to promoter-specific binding factors

DNA binding preferences of S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase I Core Factor reveal a preference for the GC-minor groove and a conserved binding mechanism

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Core Factor (CF) is a key evolutionarily conserved transcription initiation factor that helps recruit RNA polymerase I (Pol I) to the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter. Upregulated Pol I transcription has been linked to many cancers, and targeting Pol I is an attractive and emerging anti-cancer strategy. Using yeast as a model system, we characterized how CF binds to the Pol I promoter by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). Synthetic DNA competitors along with anti-tumor drugs and nucleic acid stains that act as DNA groove blockers were used to discover the binding preference of yeast CF. Our results show that CF employs a unique binding mechanism where it prefers the GC-rich minor groove within the rDNA promoter. In addition, we show that yeast CF is able to bind to the human rDNA promoter sequence that is divergent in DNA sequence and demonstrate CF sensitivity to the human specific Pol I inhibitor, CX-5461. Finally, we show that the human Core Promoter Element (CPE) can functionally replace the yeast Core Element (CE) in vivo when aligned by conserved DNA structural features rather than DNA sequence. Together, these findings suggest that the yeast CF and the human ortholog Selectivity Factor 1 (SL1) use an evolutionarily conserved, structure-based mechanism to target DNA. Their shared mechanism may offer a new avenue in using yeast to explore current and future Pol I anti-cancer compounds.

Identification of hamster inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) promoter sequences that influence basal and inducible iNOS expression

IFN-γ/LPS-activated hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) macrophages express significantly less iNOS (NOS2) than activated mouse macrophages, which contributes to the hamster's susceptibility to intracellular pathogens. We determined a mechanism responsible for differences in iNOS promoter activity in hamsters and mice. The HtPP (1.2 kb) showed low basal and inducible promoter activity when compared with the mouse, and sequences within a 100-bp region (-233 to -133) of the mouse and hamster promoters influenced this activity. Moreover, within this 100 bp, we identified a smaller region (44 bp) in the mouse promoter, which recovered basal promoter activity when swapped into the hamster promoter. The mouse homolog (100-bp region) contained a cis-element for NF-IL-6 (-153/-142), which was absent in the hamster counterpart. EMSA and supershift assays revealed that the hamster sequence did not support the binding of NF-IL-6. Introduction of a functional NF-IL-6 binding sequence into the hamster promoter or its alteration in the mouse promoter revealed the critical importance of this transcription factor for full iNOS promoter activity. Furthermore, the binding of NF-IL-6 to the iNOS promoter (-153/-142) in vivo was increased in mouse cells but was reduced in hamster cells after IFN-γ/LPS stimulation. Differences in the activity of the iNOS promoters were evident in mouse and hamster cells, so they were not merely a result of species-specific differences in transcription factors. Thus, we have identified unique DNA sequences and a critical transcription factor, NF-IL-6, which contribute to the overall basal and inducible expression of hamster iNOS.

Nucleolar dominance and ribosomal RNA gene silencing

Nucleolar dominance is an epigenetic phenomenon that occurs in genetic hybrids and describes the expression of 45S rRNA genes inherited from one progenitor due to the silencing of the other progenitor's rRNA genes. Nucleolar dominance is a manifestation of rRNA gene dosage control, which also occurs in non-hybrids, regulating the number of active rRNA genes according to the cellular demand for ribosomes and protein synthesis. Ribosomal RNA gene silencing involves changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications, but the molecular basis for choosing which genes to silence remains unclear. Recent studies indicate a role for short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or structured regulatory RNAs in rRNA gene silencing in plants or mammals, respectively, suggesting that RNA may impart specificity to the choice mechanism.

Sterility and gene expression in hybrid males of Xenopus laevis and X. muelleri

BACKGROUND

Reproductive isolation is a defining characteristic of populations that represent unique biological species, yet we know very little about the gene expression basis for reproductive isolation. The advent of powerful molecular biology tools provides the ability to identify genes involved in reproductive isolation and focuses attention on the molecular mechanisms that separate biological species. Herein we quantify the sterility pattern of hybrid males in African Clawed Frogs (Xenopus) and apply microarray analysis of the expression pattern found in testes to identify genes that are misexpressed in hybrid males relative to their two parental species (Xenopus laevis and X. muelleri).

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Phenotypic characteristics of spermatogenesis in sterile male hybrids (X. laevis x X. muelleri) were examined using a novel sperm assay that allowed quantification of live, dead, and undifferentiated sperm cells, the number of motile vs. immotile sperm, and sperm morphology. Hybrids exhibited a dramatically lower abundance of mature sperm relative to the parental species. Hybrid spermatozoa were larger in size and accompanied by numerous undifferentiated sperm cells. Microarray analysis of gene expression in testes was combined with a correction for sequence divergence derived from genomic hybridizations to identify candidate genes involved in the sterility phenotype. Analysis of the transcriptome revealed a striking asymmetric pattern of misexpression. There were only about 140 genes misexpressed in hybrids compared to X. laevis but nearly 4,000 genes misexpressed in hybrids compared to X. muelleri.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Our results provide an important correlation between phenotypic characteristics of sperm and gene expression in sterile hybrid males. The broad pattern of gene misexpression suggests intriguing mechanisms creating the dominance pattern of the X. laevis genome in hybrids. These findings significantly contribute to growing evidence for allelic dominance in hybrids and have implications for the mechanism of species differentiation at the transcriptome level.

Development of a novel Borna disease virus reverse genetics system using RNA polymerase II promoter and SV40 nuclear import signal

Borna disease virus (BDV) is a noncytolytic, neurotropic RNA virus that replicates and transcribes in the nucleus of infected cells. Therefore, efficient synthesis of BDV RNA in the nucleus is critical for the development of a reverse genetics system for this virus. Here, we report the development of such a system using the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) promoter. The BDV minigenome cDNA was flanked by hammerhead ribozyme and hepatitis delta ribozyme sequences and inserted downstream of the Pol II promoter. To improve the efficacy of minigenome expression, we estimated the effects of several signal sequences within the minigenome constructs. We found that insertion of the SV40 nuclear import sequence into the Pol II constructs significantly enhances the replication of the minigenome even in cells lacking the SV40 large T antigen. This novel system is theoretically applicable to any mammalian cell line and would be valuable for analyzing host- or cell-type-dependent differences in BDV replication and production. We could demonstrate here the cell-type-dependent inhibitory effect of the viral protein X on BDV polymerase activity. This system may be useful for various research fields not only of BDV but also of other negative-sense RNA viruses.

RNA polymerase I transcription in confluent cells: Rb downregulates rDNA transcription during confluence-induced cell cycle arrest

When 3T6 cells are confluent, they withdraw from the cell cycle. Concomitant with cell cycle arrest a significant reduction in RNA polymerase I transcription (80% decrease at 100% confluence) is observed. In the present study, we examined mechanism(s) through which transcription of the ribosomal genes is coupled to cell cycle arrest induced by cell density. Interestingly with an increase in cell density (from 3 - 43% confluence), a significant accumulation in the cellular content of hyperphosphorylated Rb was observed. As cell density increased further, the hypophosphorylated form of Rb became predominant and accumulated in the nucleoli. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated there was also a significant rise in the amount of hypophosphorylated Rb associated with the rDNA transcription factor UBF. This increased interaction between Rb and UBF correlated with the reduced rate of rDNA transcription. Furthermore, overexpression of recombinant Rb inhibited UBF-dependent activation of transcription from a cotransfected rDNA reporter in either confluent or exponential cells. The amounts or activities of the rDNA transcription components we examined did not significantly change with cell cycle arrest. Although the content of PAF53, a polymerase associated factor, was altered marginally (decreased 38%), the time course and magnitude of the decrease did not correlate with the reduced rate of rDNA transcription. The results presented support a model wherein regulation of the binding of UBF to Rb and, perhaps the cellular content of PAF53, are components of the mechanism through which cell cycle and rDNA transcription are linked. Oncogene (2000) 19, 3487 - 3497

Nucleolar dominance: uniparental gene silencing on a multi-megabase scale in genetic hybrids

Nucleolar dominance is a phenomenon in hybrids or allopolyploids in which nucleoli form on chromosomes inherited from only one of the two parents. The molecular basis for nucleolar dominance is the transcription by RNA polymerase I of only one parental set of ribosomal RNA genes (rRNA genes). These rRNA genes are clustered by the hundreds, or thousands, of copies, often spanning tens of millions of basepairs of chromosomal DNA at loci known as nucleolus organizer regions (NORs). Enforcement of nucleolar dominance appears to be accomplished by selectively silencing one set of rRNA genes via chemical modifications of chromatin. However, the mechanisms responsible for initially discriminating among the parental sets of rRNA genes and establishing nucleolar dominance remain unclear. Possibilities include mechanisms that act on each rRNA gene or mechanisms that affect whole NORs or even larger chromosomal domains. This review provides a historical perspective of nucleolar dominance research, explores the most popular hypotheses and their shortcomings, and offers some speculations concerning alternative hypotheses to be considered.

RNA polymerase I transcription in a Brassica interspecific hybrid and its progenitors: Tests of transcription factor involvement in nucleolar dominance

In interspecific hybrids or allopolyploids, often one parental set of ribosomal RNA genes is transcribed and the other is silent, an epigenetic phenomenon known as nucleolar dominance. Silencing is enforced by cytosine methylation and histone deacetylation, but the initial discrimination mechanism is unknown. One hypothesis is that a species-specific transcription factor is inactivated, thereby silencing one set of rRNA genes. Another is that dominant rRNA genes have higher binding affinities for limiting transcription factors. A third suggests that selective methylation of underdominant rRNA genes blocks transcription factor binding. We tested these hypotheses using Brassica napus (canola), an allotetraploid derived from B. rapa and B. oleracea in which only B. rapa rRNA genes are transcribed. B. oleracea and B. rapa rRNA genes were active when transfected into protoplasts of the other species, which argues against the species-specific transcription factor model. B. oleracea and B. rapa rRNA genes also competed equally for the pol I transcription machinery in vitro and in vivo. Cytosine methylation had no effect on rRNA gene transcription in vitro, which suggests that transcription factor binding was unimpaired. These data are inconsistent with the prevailing models and point to discrimination mechanisms that are likely to act at a chromosomal level.

Regulation of ribosomal DNA transcription by insulin

The experiments reported here used 3T6-Swiss albino mouse fibroblasts and H4-II-E-C3 rat hepatoma cells as model systems to examine the mechanism(s) through which insulin regulates rDNA transcription. Serum starvation of 3T6 cells for 72 h resulted in a marked reduction in rDNA transcription. Treatment of serum-deprived cells with insulin was sufficient to restore rDNA transcription to control values. In addition, treatment of exponentially growing H4-II-E-C3 with insulin stimulated rDNA transcription. However, for both cell types, the stimulation of rDNA transcription in response to insulin was not associated with a change in the cellular content of RNA polymerase I. Thus we conclude that insulin must cause alterations in formation of the active RNA polymerase I initiation complex and/or the activities of auxiliary rDNA transcription factors. In support of this conclusion, insulin treatment of both cell types was found to increase the nuclear content of upstream binding factor (UBF) and RNA polymerase I-associated factor 53. Both of these factors are thought to be involved in recruitment of RNA polymerase I to the rDNA promoter. Nuclear run-on experiments demonstrated that the increase in cellular content of UBF was due to elevated transcription of the UBF gene. In addition, overexpression of UBF was sufficient to directly stimulate rDNA transcription from a reporter construct. The results demonstrate that insulin is capable of stimulating rDNA transcription in both 3T6 and H4-II-E-C3 cells, at least in part by increasing the cellular content of components required for assembly of RNA polymerase I into an active complex.

Species specificity of ribosomal gene transcription: a factor associated with human RNA polymerase I prevents transcription of mouse rDNA

An intrinsic property of class I gene transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is the species specificity of the initiation reaction. Previous studies have demonstrated that species-specific rDNA promoter recognition is brought about by a TBP-TAF complex, termed TIF-IB in mouse and SL1 in man. We have compared the ability of affinity-purified TIF-IB and SL1 to direct transcription from the homologous rDNA template both in a reconstituted transcription system and in nuclear extracts prepared from mouse and human cells. We show that Pol I from both species and the individual transcription factors, with the exception of TIF-IB/SL1, are functionally interchangeable in the reconstituted transcription system containing purified proteins. In nuclear extracts, however, species-specific differences are obvious. Whereas SL1 reprograms a heterologous mouse extract to recognize the human promoter, TIF-IB fails to reprogram a human extract unless it is complemented with mouse Pol I. Crude human, but not mouse, Pol I exhibits species-specific differences that disappear after purification. We propose that in extracts and less purified fractions human Pol I exists as 'holoenzyme' containing associated protein(s) that prevent assembly of TIF-IB-directed initiation complexes at the murine rDNA promoter.

Indirect evidence of alteration in the expression of the rDNA genes in interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

Crosses between Drosophila melanogaster females and D. simulans males produce viable hybrid females, while males are lethal. These males are rescued if they carry the D. simulans Lhr gene. This paper reports that females of the wild-type D. melanogaster population Staket do not produce viable hybrid males when crossed with D. simulans Lhr males, a phenomenon which we designate as the Staket phenotype. The agent responsible for this phenomenon was found to be the Staket X chromosome (Xmel, Stk). Analysis of the Staket phenotype showed that it is suppressed by extra copies of D. melanogaster rDNA genes and that the Xmel, Stk chromosome manifests a weak bobbed phenotype in D. melanogaster Xmel, Stk/0 males. The numbers of functional rDNA genes in Xmel, Stk and Xmel, y w (control) chromosomes were found not to differ significantly. Thus a reduction in rDNA gene number cannot account for the weak bobbed Xmel, Stk phenotype let alone the Staket phenotype. The rRNA precursor molecules transcribed from the Xmel, Stk rDNA genes seem to be correctly processed in both intraspecific (melanogaster) and interspecific (melanogaster-simulans) conditions. It is therefore suggested that the Xmel, Stk rDNA genes are inefficiently transcribed in the melanogaster-simulans hybrids.

Transcription from the rat 45S ribosomal DNA promoter does not require the factor UBF

For efficient transcription from the rat ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter by RNA polymerase I in vitro, at least two transcription factors, rat UBF and rat SL-1, are required. Transcription cannot take place in vitro in the absence of SL-1. On the other hand, there is considerable difference of opinion concerning the necessity for UBF in in vitro transcription mediated by RNA polymerase 1, and the requirement for UBF is not clear. Mammalian cells code for UBF1 and UBF2, two forms of UBF that differ in HMG box-2, one of four HMG boxes or DNA-binding domains. We have used a monospecific antibody raised to recombinant rat UBF to determine whether UBF1 and UBF2 are required for RNA polymerase I-mediated transcription. This antibody can detect as little as 1.35 x 10(-15) moles of UBF1 or UBF2 in an immunoblot. Fractionated extracts that were competent for transcription had no detectable UBF1 or UBF2 when assayed in immunoblots with this antiserum. This evidence supports the hypothesis that UBF is not required for transcription of the rat rDNA promoter in vitro and most likely functions as an auxillary transcription factor. In addition, we have fractionated rat UBF1 from UBF2 and tested each of them in in vitro transcription assays in which the 45S or spacer rDNA promoter template is limiting. UBF1 can activate transcription from either the 45S or spacer promoter under these conditions, whereas UBF2 cannot. This implies that there is a functional difference in the transactivation of RNA polymerase I by UBF1 and UBF2 in vitro.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Molecular mechanisms governing species-specific transcription of ribosomal RNA

An unusual property of ribosomal RNA transcription is the species specificity of promoter recognition. Unexpectedly, the sequence-specific RNA pol I transcription factors hUBF and xUBF, isolated from human and Xenopus cells, respectively, recognize the same DNA sequence elements. Despite this similarity in DNA binding activity, neither factor will functionally substitute for the other in reconstituted transcription assays, suggesting that the specificity of protein-DNA interactions cannot account for the species-specific activation of transcription by hUBF and xUBF. Interestingly, we find that hUBF and xUBF form distinctly different complexes with human SL1 at both the human and Xenopus promoters. Together these results strongly implicate specific protein-protein interactions between transcription factors as an important determinant of promoter selectivity and species specificity.

The structure and function of steroid receptor proteins

This review has highlighted several topics in the study of steroid hormone action. The unanswered questions regarding the mechanism of ligand-controlled LRF activity, the extent of evolutionary conservation and specificity of DNA binding, and the validity of various models of transcriptional regulation mediated through gene networks point to the future direction of research in this field. Steroid hormones are used extensively in clinical treatments, especially glucocorticoids. Our laboratory is attempting to determine which gene networks are responsible for some of these clinical phenotypes. Figure 5 points out that the study of glucocorticoid action holds a unique position because it spans both the basic sciences and the field of applied molecular biology. Now that we have a fundamental knowledge of the necessary elements required for steroid-dependent regulation of gene expression, we can better investigate the clinical responses to steroid therapy (which include devastating side effects) by isolating and characterizing the important target gene(s). In this author's opinion, future directions in the study of steroid responsiveness will have to include a systematic approach toward deciphering a variety of these LRF-regulated gene networks in experimentally feasible systems. Hopefully, work in this area may be revealing and perhaps beneficial to ongoing clinical studies. In addition, the study of mechanisms of transcriptional induction and repression, using the model system of LRFs, could be applicable to many gene regulatory systems which are controlled by such processes as development and differentiation.

Structure of melon rDNA and nucleotide sequence of the 17-25S spacer region

Restriction enzyme and hybridization analysis of melon nuclear DNA suggests a homogenous rDNA population with a repeat unit of 10.2 kb. Several full length Hind III rDNA repeat units were cloned and one of these is described in detail. The regions coding for 25S, 17S and 5.8S rRNAs were located by crossed-contact hybridization and R-loop mapping. Introns were not observed. The nucleotide sequence of the internal transcribed spacer and flanking regions was determined and compared with the corresponding region from rice rDNA by dot matrix analysis. In addition, the extent of gross sequence homology between cloned melon and pea rDNA units was determined by heteroduplex mapping.

Transcription of mouse rDNA is regulated by an activated subform of RNA polymerase I

We have identified the species-nonspecific factor required for mouse rDNA transcription, factor C, as an activated subform of RNA polymerase I. C is an RNA polymerase I since it copurifies with bulk polymerase I activity on the three chromatographic columns used to achieve a virtually homogenous preparation of polymerase I, as well as on four additional matrices; it is quantitatively neutralized as well as immunoprecipitated by two different types of anti-polymerase I antibodies; and it has thermal lability identical to that of bulk polymerase I. However, C is clearly distinct from bulk polymerase I in its ability to participate in the stable rDNA transcription complex and to catalyze accurate initiation of rRNA synthesis. It also has a greater sedimentation coefficient than bulk polymerase I. Furthermore, this activated polymerase subform is specifically lacking in extracts of cells in which rDNA transcription was down-regulated because of cycloheximide treatment or attainment of stationary phase. These data suggest that regulation of rDNA transcription in vivo may involve modulation in availability of the activated polymerase I subform.

Regions upstream from the core promoter of the rat ribosomal gene are required for the formation of a stable transcription initiation complex by RNA polymerase I in vitro

The sites required for the formation of a stable transcription initiation complex and for the initiation of transcription of rat rDNA in vitro were examined. A series of 5' deletion mutants of the rat transcription initiation region (-167 through +638) were constructed. These mutants were examined for their ability to support the faithful initiation of transcription in vitro. Mutants which contain less than 31 nucleotides upstream of the initiation site (+1) were unable to support detectable initiation of transcription. In this transcription system a series of deletion mutants from -167 to -31 were transcribed with equal efficiency when assayed individually. On the other hand, when the wild-type and mutant templates were compared in order-of-addition assays, they were found to be unequal. The incubation of an extract with a wild-type template, prior to the addition of nucleotides, precluded transcription of any second template added after the preincubation step. However, the preincubation of extract with mutants of the region upstream of the core promoter, from -122 to -31, did not preclude transcription of a wild-type template added after the preincubation step. Formation of the stable preinitiation complex was found to require the region between and -167.

Regulation of eukaryotic ribosomal RNA transcription by RNA polymerase modification

Forms of RNA polymerase I prepared from growing or encysted Acanthamoeba are equal in the ability to transcribe poly(dl:dC). Polymerase from cysts, whose rRNA genes are transcriptionally inactive, is unable to utilize the rDNA promoter in vitro, whereas the transcription initiation factor from cysts is fully able to bind the promoter and direct transcription. Footprinting shows that polymerase from cysts is functionally inactive because of its inability to bind to the promoter. The polymerase footprint moves downstream the appropriate number of base pairs upon various nucleotide additions, without affecting the factor footprint. These results support our hypothesis that rRNA synthesis in eukaryotes is regulated by polymerase I modification and not by alterations to additional DNA-binding proteins.

Human rRNA transcription is modulated by the coordinate binding of two factors to an upstream control element

The human rRNA promoter contains two distinct cis-control sequences, the core and upstream control element (UCE), that serve as the target for binding cellular trans-activating proteins involved in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I. One of these factors, SL1, has been extensively purified and shown to be a species-specific factor required to reconstitute in vitro RNA synthesis. DNAase footprinting revealed that although SL1 alone does not bind specifically to rRNA promoter sequences, a second factor, UBF1, recruits SL1 to the template and directs binding to an extended region encompassing sequences in the UCE. Analysis of mutant and human-mouse hybrid promoters indicate that protein-DNA interactions at the UCE modulate the efficiency of rRNA synthesis. Transcription from the human rRNA promoter appears to require an unusual set of protein-DNA transactions in which recognition and binding to an upstream cis-control element is carried out by one factor (UBF1), whereas activation requires an additional factor, SL1, acting in conjunction with UBF1 to trigger transcription.

Mapping of endogenous nuclease-sensitive regions and of putative topoisomerase sites of action along the chromatin of Dictyostelium ribosomal RNA genes

Indirect end-labelling and the digestion patterns of endogenous and exogenous nucleases were used to analyse chromatin organization along the ribosomal RNA genes of Dictyostelium discoideum cells. A zone just upstream from the 5' end of the coding region was particularly sensitive to endogenous nucleases. In exponentially growing cells, this hypersensitive zone extended from -350 to -1600 bp relative to the transcription start. In sharp contrast, the DNA between 0 and -350 bp was strongly protected. In differentiating cells, in which the ribosomal RNA transcription rate is low, the 5' hypersensitive zone was more diffuse than in exponentially growing cells, and the protected region at the 5' end of the transcribed region was less pronounced. It is known that where DNA topoisomerase is acting on DNA, the addition of sodium dodecyl sulphate will result in cleavage of the DNA and covalent attachment of the enzyme to the cut DNA end. Treatment of nuclei from both exponentially growing cells and differentiating cells with SDS caused double-stranded cleavages at -200 (i.e. within the protected region), at -2200, and at two sites at about -17 kb. A fraction of the cleavage products appeared to be strongly associated with protein. Novobiocin, a DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor, did not inhibit the SDS-induced cleavages in vegetative cells. However, it significantly reduced the extent of nuclease cleavage within the -350 to -1600 bp hypersensitive zone. The possibility is discussed that there are two DNA topoisomerase-like activities on the ribosomal genes. One is site-specific and novobiocin-insensitive. We speculate that the other is responsible for maintaining DNA at the 5' end of the gene in a torsionally strained, nuclease-hypersensitive state.

Transcription of eukaryotic ribosomal RNA gene

Remarkable advances have been made in the identification of the promoter regions for the ribosomal RNA genes from lower and higher eukaryotes. There has been some progress in the elucidation of the factors that control transcription of the ribosomal RNA gene. The characterization of the transcription factors are crucial for the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of ribosomal gene expression.

Conservation and divergence in multigene families: alternatives to selection and drift

It is generally assumed that conservation and divergence of DNA signify function (selection) and no function (drift), respectively. This assumption is based on the view that a mutation is a unique event on a single chromosome, the fate of which depends on selection or drift. Knowledge of the rates, units and biases of widespread mechanisms of non-reciprocal DNA exchange, in particular within multigene families, provides alternative explanations for conservation and divergence, notwithstanding biological function. Such mechanisms of DNA turnover cause continual fluctuations in the copy-number of variant genes in an individual and, hence, promote the gradual and cohesive spread of a variant gene throughout a family (homogenization) and throughout a population (fixation). The dual processes (molecular drive) of homogenization and fixation are inextricably linked. Data are presented of the expected stages of transition in the spread of variant repeats by molecular drive in some non-genic families of DNA, seemingly not under the influence of selection. When a molecularly driven change in a given gene family is accompanied by the coevolution (mediated by selection) of other DNA, RNA or protein molecules that interact with the gene family then biological function is observed to be maintained despite sequence divergence. Conversely, the mechanics of DNA turnover and a turnover bias in favour of ancestral sequences can dramatically retard the rate of sequence change, in the absence of function. Examples of the maintenance of function by molecular coevolution and conservation of sequences in the absence of function, are drawn mainly from the rDNA multigene family.

Characterization of the region around the start point of transcription of ribosomal RNA in the Chinese hamster

The initiation site for ribosomal RNA transcription in the Chinese hamster was identified and the sequence around and upstream determined. The start point region shows considerable homology with comparable regions in the mouse and rat. In the Chinese hamster, the region between bp -700 and -200 consists of imperfect repeats approximately 120-130 bp in length which are flanked by T-rich regions. The region within each repeat which is homologous with an adjacent repeat decreases in length as the start point is approached. The final promoter-proximal repeat preserves only an 11-bp region of the promoter-distal repeats. This short sequence, termed the repeat core, appears with a periodicity of about 120-130 bp in the Chinese hamster, and is conserved in both mouse and rat. In humans, a short repeated sequence occupies similar positions, suggesting that while complete 120-130-bp repeats are not a feature of all mammalian RNA polymerase I promoter-proximal r X DNA spacers, a short sequence repeating with approximate 120-130-bp periodicity may be such a feature.

The evolution of eukaryotic ribosomal DNA

Mutations occur randomly throughout the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence. Molecular drive (unequal crossing-over, gene conversion, and transposition) spreads these variations through the multiple copies of rDNA. Forces of selection act upon the variants to favor and fix them or disfavor and eliminate them. Selection has not permitted changes in regions within rRNA vital for its function; these sequences are evolutionarily conserved between diverse species. Possible functions for some of these conserved sequences are discussed. The secondary structure of rRNA is also highly conserved during evolution. However, eukaryotic rRNA is larger than prokaryotic rRNA due to blocks of "expansion segments". Arguments are put forward that expansion segments might not play any functional role. Other examples are reviewed of rDNA sequence insertion or deletion, including introns and the internal transcribed spacer 2.

Conservation of major nuclease S1-sensitive sites in the non-conserved spacer region of ribosomal DNA in Drosophila species

We have analysed nuclease S1-sensitive sites in cloned ribosomal DNA repeats from Drosophila melanogaster, D. hydei and D. virilis. All species contain major S1-sensitive sites in the spacer near the region of transcription termination, albeit with somewhat different positions and sensitivities. The same sites are also sensitive to the single-strand specificity of Bal31 nuclease at neutral pH. Additional major sites exist at each end of the intervening sequence within the 28 S gene of non-transcribed intervening-sequence-positive ribosomal DNA units of D. hydei. Only minor sites, however, were detected in the Pol I promoter regions. This is in contrast to Pol II transcribed genes, where S1 hypersensitivity becomes apparent at the 5' ends during gene expression. We have sequenced and mapped the S1 sites in the D. hydei spacer. They consist mainly of alternating A and T nucleotides that could form small cruciform structures. Cross-hybridization at low stringencies between the relevant S1-sensitive spacer regions of the three species indicates that the sites lie within very divergent sequences. We discuss the potential functional significance of S1 sites in rDNA spacers and intervening sequences, and the manner in which they might be maintained during rDNA sequence divergence.

Assembly of transcriptionally active chromatin in Xenopus oocytes requires specific DNA binding factors

Active minichromosomes assembled on injected 5S RNA gene clones are stable in Xenopus oocytes; endogenous 5S DNA specific factor(s) are required for their assembly. When somatic-type and oocyte-type 5S RNA gene clones are coinjected, the somatic genes are assembled into active minichromosomes, while most of the oocyte genes are assembled into inactive ones. The differential 5S RNA gene expression, which mimics that in somatic cells, appears to result from titration of 5S DNA specific factor(s) by the competing somatic 5S DNA, followed by histone mediated assembly of inactive chromatin on the oocyte 5S DNA. Stable minichromosomes are also assembled on a cloned histone H4 gene; again, intragenic DNA rearrangements affect the efficiency of assembly of active chromatin and differential gene expression occurs after coinjection of two or more H4 DNA constructs. We suggest that the H4 DNA molecules also compete for limiting quantities of specific DNA binding factor(s) required for the assembly of active H4 gene chromatin.

The mechanism of nucleolar dominance in Xenopus hybrids

We have mimicked the phenomena of nucleolar dominance by injecting cloned ribosomal genes from X. laevis and X. borealis into oocytes from either species and into embryos. The results of these experiments suggest that the dominance of the laevis ribosomal genes in hybrid embryos is primarily due to the fact that the laevis spacer has more copies of an enhancer element for the ribosomal gene promoter than does the borealis spacer. A contributing effect is that the laevis promoter functions well with transcription machinery from either species while the borealis promoter interacts poorly with laevis transcription machinery.