1
|
Law K, Garcia ERM, Hastad C, Murray D, Urriola PE, Gomez A. Interactions between maternal parity and feed additives drive the composition of pig gut microbiomes in the post-weaning period. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2024; 15:33. [PMID: 38431668 PMCID: PMC10909285 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-024-00993-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nursery pigs undergo stressors in the post-weaning period that result in production and welfare challenges. These challenges disproportionately impact the offspring of primiparous sows compared to those of multiparous counterparts. Little is known regarding potential interactions between parity and feed additives in the post-weaning period and their effects on nursery pig microbiomes. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of maternal parity on sow and offspring microbiomes and the influence of sow parity on pig fecal microbiome and performance in response to a prebiotic post-weaning. At weaning, piglets were allotted into three treatment groups: a standard nursery diet including pharmacological doses of Zn and Cu (Con), a group fed a commercial prebiotic only (Preb) based on an Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract, and a group fed the same prebiotic plus Zn and Cu (Preb + ZnCu). RESULTS Although there were no differences in vaginal microbiome composition between primiparous and multiparous sows, fecal microbiome composition was different (R2 = 0.02, P = 0.03). The fecal microbiomes of primiparous offspring displayed significantly higher bacterial diversity compared to multiparous offspring at d 0 and d 21 postweaning (P < 0.01), with differences in community composition observed at d 21 (R2 = 0.03, P = 0.04). When analyzing the effects of maternal parity within each treatment, only the Preb diet triggered significant microbiome distinctions between primiparous and multiparous offspring (d 21: R2 = 0.13, P = 0.01; d 42: R2 = 0.19, P = 0.001). Compositional differences in pig fecal microbiomes between treatments were observed only at d 21 (R2 = 0.12, P = 0.001). Pigs in the Con group gained significantly more weight throughout the nursery period when compared to those in the Preb + ZnCu group. CONCLUSIONS Nursery pig gut microbiome composition was influenced by supplementation with an Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract, with varying effects on performance when combined with pharmacological levels of Zn and Cu or for offspring of different maternal parity groups. These results indicate that the development of nursery pig gut microbiomes is shaped by maternal parity and potential interactions with the effects of dietary feed additives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla Law
- Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, 1364 Eckles Avenue, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA
| | | | - Chad Hastad
- New Fashion Pork, 164 Industrial Parkway, Jackson, MN, 56143, USA
| | - Deborah Murray
- New Fashion Pork, 164 Industrial Parkway, Jackson, MN, 56143, USA
| | - Pedro E Urriola
- Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, 1364 Eckles Avenue, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA
| | - Andres Gomez
- Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, 1364 Eckles Avenue, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ortiz Sanjuán JM, Manzanilla EG, Cabrera-Rubio R, Crispie F, Cotter PD, Garrido JJ, Ekhlas D, O’Neill L, Argüello H. Fine-tuning of post-weaning pig microbiome structure and functionality by in-feed zinc oxide and antibiotics use. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2024; 14:1354449. [PMID: 38384302 PMCID: PMC10879578 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1354449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) is a multifactorial disease that affects piglets after weaning, contributing to productive and economic losses. Its control includes the use of in-feed prophylactic antibiotics and therapeutic zinc oxide (ZnO), treatments that, since 2022, are no longer permitted in the European Union due to spread of antimicrobial resistance genes and pollution of soil with heavy metals. A dysbiosis in the microbiota has been suggested as a potential risk factor of PWD onset. Understanding pig's microbiota development around weaning and its changes in response to ZnO and antibiotics is crucial to develop feasible alternatives to prophylactic and metaphylactic antimicrobial use. Methods This study used shotgun metagenomic sequencing to investigate the environmental and faecal microbiota on 10 farms using (Treated) or not using (ZnO-free) in-feed antibiotics and ZnO during the first 14 days post-weaning (dpw). Environmental samples from clean pens were collected at weaning day (0dpw), and faecal samples at 0, 7 and 14dpw. Diarrhoeic faecal samples were collected at 7dpw when available. Results The analysis of data revealed that the faecal microbiota composition and its functionality was impacted by the sampling time point (microbiota maturation after weaning) but not by the farm environment. Treatment with antibiotics and ZnO showed no effects on diversity indices while the analyses of microbiota taxonomic and functional profiles revealed increased abundance of taxa and metabolic functions associated with Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens or different species of Prevotella spp. on the Treated farms, and with Megasphaera elsdenii and Escherichia coli on the ZnO-free farms. The analysis of diarrhoea samples revealed that the treatment favoured the microbiota transition or maturation from 0dpw to 14dpw in Treated farms, resembling the composition of healthy animals, when compared to diarrhoea from ZnO-free farms, which were linked in composition to 0dpw samples. Discussion The results provide a comprehensive overview of the beneficial effects of ZnO and antibiotics in PWD in the microbiota transition after weaning, preventing the overgrowth of pathogens such as pathogenic E. coli and revealing the key aspects in microbiota maturation that antibiotics or ZnO alternatives should fulfil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan M. Ortiz Sanjuán
- Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland
- Grupo de Genómica y Mejora Animal, Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Edgar G. Manzanilla
- Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Raúl Cabrera-Rubio
- Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland
- APC Microbiome Institute Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Fiona Crispie
- Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland
- APC Microbiome Institute Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Paul D. Cotter
- Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland
- APC Microbiome Institute Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- VistaMilk Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Research Centre, Cork, Ireland
| | - Juan J. Garrido
- Grupo de Genómica y Mejora Animal, Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Daniel Ekhlas
- Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lorcan O’Neill
- Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Cork, Ireland
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Héctor Argüello
- Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen D, Cheng K, Wan L, Cui C, Li G, Zhao D, Yu Y, Liao X, Liu Y, D'Souza AW, Lian X, Sun J. Daily occupational exposure in swine farm alters human skin microbiota and antibiotic resistome. IMETA 2024; 3:e158. [PMID: 38868515 PMCID: PMC10989081 DOI: 10.1002/imt2.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major threat to global public health, and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are widely distributed across humans, animals, and environment. Farming environments are emerging as a key research area for ARGs and antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB). While the skin is an important reservoir of ARGs and ARB, transmission mechanisms between farming environments and human skin remain unclear. Previous studies confirmed that swine farm environmental exposures alter skin microbiome, but the timeline of these changes is ill defined. To improve understanding of these changes and to determine the specific time, we designed a cohort study of swine farm workers and students through collected skin and environmental samples to explore the impact of daily occupational exposure in swine farm on human skin microbiome. Results indicated that exposure to livestock-associated environments where microorganisms are richer than school environment can reshape the human skin microbiome and antibiotic resistome. Exposure of 5 h was sufficient to modify the microbiome and ARG structure in workers' skin by enriching microorganisms and ARGs. These changes were preserved once formed. Further analysis indicated that ARGs carried by host microorganisms may transfer between the environment with workers' skin and have the potential to expand to the general population using farm workers as an ARG vector. These results raised concerns about potential transmission of ARGs to the broader community. Therefore, it is necessary to take corresponding intervention measures in the production process to reduce the possibility of ARGs and ARB transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong‐Rui Chen
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Jiangsu Co‐Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and ZoonosesYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
- Veterinary CenterGuangxi State Farms Yongxin Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd.NanningChina
| | - Ke Cheng
- Veterinary CenterGuangxi State Farms Yongxin Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd.NanningChina
| | - Lei Wan
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Jiangsu Co‐Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and ZoonosesYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
| | - Chao‐Yue Cui
- Laboratory Animal CentreWenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhouChina
| | - Gong Li
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Jiangsu Co‐Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and ZoonosesYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
| | - Dong‐Hao Zhao
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Jiangsu Co‐Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and ZoonosesYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
| | - Yang Yu
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Jiangsu Co‐Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and ZoonosesYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
| | - Xiao‐Ping Liao
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Jiangsu Co‐Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and ZoonosesYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
| | - Ya‐Hong Liu
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Jiangsu Co‐Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and ZoonosesYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
| | - Alaric W. D'Souza
- Department of PediatricsBoston Children's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Xin‐Lei Lian
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Jian Sun
- State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and PreventionSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary MedicineSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety EvaluationSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
- Jiangsu Co‐Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and ZoonosesYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harlow K, Summers KL, Oliver WT, Wells JE, Crouse M, Neville BW, Rempel LA, Rivera I, Ramsay TG, Davies CP. Weaning transition, but not the administration of probiotic candidate Kazachstania slooffiae, shaped the gastrointestinal bacterial and fungal communities in nursery piglets. Front Vet Sci 2024; 10:1303984. [PMID: 38274656 PMCID: PMC10808496 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1303984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
As in-feed antibiotics are phased out of swine production, producers are seeking alternatives to facilitate improvements in growth typically seen from this previously common feed additive. Kazachstania slooffiae is a prominent commensal fungus in the swine gut that peaks in relative abundance shortly after weaning and has beneficial interactions with other bacteriome members important for piglet health. In this study, piglets were supplemented with K. slooffiae to characterize responses in piglet health as well as fungal and bacterial components of the microbiome both spatially (along the entire gastrointestinal tract and feces) and temporally (before, during, and after weaning). Litters were assigned to one of four treatments: no K. slooffiae (CONT); one dose of K. slooffiae 7 days before weaning (day 14; PRE); one dose of K. slooffiae at weaning (day 21; POST); or one dose of K. slooffiae 7 days before weaning and one dose at weaning (PREPOST). The bacteriome and mycobiome were analyzed from fecal samples collected from all piglets at day 14, day 21, and day 49, and from organ samples along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract at day 21 and day 49. Blood samples were taken at day 14 and day 49 for cytokine analysis, and fecal samples were assayed for antimicrobial resistance. While some regional shifts were seen in response to K. slooffiae administration in the mycobiome of the GI tract, no remarkable changes in weight gain or health of the animals were observed, and changes were more likely due to sow and the environment. Ultimately, the combined microbiome changed most considerably following the transition from suckling to nursery diets. This work describes the mycobiome along the piglet GI tract through the weaning transition for the first time. Based on these findings, K. slooffiae administered at this concentration may not be an effective tool to hasten colonization of K. slooffiae in the piglet GI tract around the weaning transition nor support piglet growth, microbial gut health, or immunity. However, diet and environment greatly influence microbial community development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KaLynn Harlow
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Agricultural Research Service Participation Program, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
- Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States
| | - Katie Lynn Summers
- Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States
| | - William T. Oliver
- Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - James E. Wells
- Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Matthew Crouse
- Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Bryan W. Neville
- Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Lea A. Rempel
- Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE, United States
| | - Israel Rivera
- Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States
| | - Timothy G. Ramsay
- Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States
| | - Cary Pirone Davies
- Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
TSUJIKAWA Y, NISHIYAMA K, NAMAI F, IMAMURA Y, SAKUMA T, SAHA S, SUZUKI M, SAKURAI M, IWATA R, MATSUO K, TAKAMORI H, SUDA Y, ZHOU B, FUKUDA I, VILLENA J, SAKANE I, OSAWA R, KITAZAWA H. Establishment of porcine fecal-derived ex vivo microbial communities to evaluate the impact of livestock feed on gut microbiome. BIOSCIENCE OF MICROBIOTA, FOOD AND HEALTH 2023; 43:100-109. [PMID: 38577893 PMCID: PMC10981943 DOI: 10.12938/bmfh.2023-085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Sustainable livestock production requires reducing competition for food and feed resources and increasing the utilization of food by-products in livestock feed. This study describes the establishment of an anaerobic batch culture model to simulate pig microbiota and evaluate the effects of a food by-product, wakame seaweed stalks, on ex vivo microbial communities. We selected one of the nine media to support the growth of a bacterial community most similar in composition and diversity to that observed in pig donor feces. Supplementation with wakame altered the microbial profile and short-chain fatty acid composition in the ex vivo model, and a similar trajectory was observed in the in vivo pig experimental validation. Notably, the presence of wakame increased the abundance of Lactobacillus species, which may have been due to cross-feeding with Bacteroides. These results suggest the potential of wakame as a livestock feed capable of modulating the pig microbiome. Collectively, this study highlights the ability to estimate the microbiome changes that occur when pigs are fed a specific feed using an ex vivo culture model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji TSUJIKAWA
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Central Research Institute, Ito En Ltd., 21 Mekami,
Sagara-cho, Haibara-gun, Shizuoka 421-0516, Japan
- Department of Agrobioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural
Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
| | - Keita NISHIYAMA
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Livestock Immunology Unit, International Education and
Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology (CFAI), Graduate School of
Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 41 Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi
980-8576, Japan
| | - Fu NAMAI
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Livestock Immunology Unit, International Education and
Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology (CFAI), Graduate School of
Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 41 Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi
980-8576, Japan
| | - Yoshiya IMAMURA
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
| | - Taiga SAKUMA
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
| | - Sudeb SAHA
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Livestock Immunology Unit, International Education and
Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology (CFAI), Graduate School of
Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 41 Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi
980-8576, Japan
- Department of Dairy Science, Faculty of Veterinary, Animal
and Biomedical Sciences, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh
- JSPS Fellow
| | - Masahiko SUZUKI
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Central Research Institute, Ito En Ltd., 21 Mekami,
Sagara-cho, Haibara-gun, Shizuoka 421-0516, Japan
| | - Mitsuki SAKURAI
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
| | - Ryo IWATA
- Department of Agrobioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural
Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
| | - Kengo MATSUO
- Miyagi Prefecture Animal Industry Experiment Station, Osaki,
Miyagi 989-6445, Japan
| | - Hironori TAKAMORI
- Miyagi Prefecture Animal Industry Experiment Station, Osaki,
Miyagi 989-6445, Japan
| | - Yoshihito SUDA
- Department of Food, Agriculture and Environmental Science,
Miyagi University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
| | - Binghui ZHOU
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Livestock Immunology Unit, International Education and
Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology (CFAI), Graduate School of
Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 41 Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi
980-8576, Japan
| | - Itsuko FUKUDA
- Department of Agrobioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural
Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
| | - Julio VILLENA
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Livestock Immunology Unit, International Education and
Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology (CFAI), Graduate School of
Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 41 Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi
980-8576, Japan
- Laboratory of Immunobiotechnology, Reference Centre for
Lactobacilli (CERELA-CONICET), Tucuman 4000, Argentina
| | - Iwao SAKANE
- Central Research Institute, Ito En Ltd., 21 Mekami,
Sagara-cho, Haibara-gun, Shizuoka 421-0516, Japan
| | - Ro OSAWA
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Department of Agrobioscience, Graduate School of Agricultural
Science, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan
| | - Haruki KITAZAWA
- Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food
Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramakiaoba,
Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 980-8572, Japan
- Livestock Immunology Unit, International Education and
Research Center for Food and Agricultural Immunology (CFAI), Graduate School of
Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 41 Kawauchi, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi
980-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yan M, Xu C, Li C, Feng Y, Duan J, Zhao K, Wu D, Li G, Yang S, Han X, Xie Y, Huang Y, Yu X, Wu J, Zou L. Effects of environmental disinfection on microbial population and resistance genes: A case study of the microecology within a panda enclosure. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 235:116662. [PMID: 37453509 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Widespread use of disinfectants raises concerns over their involvement in altering microbial communities and promoting antimicrobial resistance. This study explores the influence of disinfection protocols on microbial populations and resistance genes within an isolated enclosure environment and in the gut of giant pandas (GPs) held within. Samples of panda feces, air conditioning ducts, soil and bamboo were collected before and after disinfection. High-throughput sequencing characterized the microbial flora of GP gut and environmental microbes inside the artificial habitat. Microbial cultures showed that Escherichia coli (34.6%), Enterococcus (15.4%) and other pathogenic bacteria deposited in feces and the enclosure. Isolates exhibit a consistent resistance to disinfectant, with the greatest resistance shown to cyanuric acid, and the lowest to glutaraldehyde-dodecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide (GD-DDAB) and dodecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide (DDAB). The total number of the culturable bacteria in soil and bamboo were significantly diminished after disinfection but increased in the gut. After disinfection, the richness (Chao1 index) of environment samples increased significantly (P < 0.05), while the richness in gut decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Ten genera showed significant change in feces after disinfection. Metagenome sequencing showed that 126 types of virulence genes were present in feces before disinfection and 37 in soil. After disinfection, 110 virulence genes localized in feces and 53 in soil. Eleven virulence genes including ECP and T2SS increased in feces. A total of 182 antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) subtypes, potentially conferring resistance to 20 classes of drugs, were detected in the soils and feces, with most belonging to efflux pump protein pathways. After disinfection, the number of resistance genes increased both in gut and soil, which suggests disinfection protocols increase the number of resistance pathways. Our study shows that the use of disinfectants helps to shape the microbial community of GPs and their habitat, and increases populations of resistant strain bacteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Yan
- College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China
| | - Chunzhong Xu
- Shanghai Wild Animal Park, Shanghai, 201399, China
| | - Caiwu Li
- Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (SFGA) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, The China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda (CCRCGP), Dujiangyan, 611830, China
| | - Yongqi Feng
- Shanghai Wild Animal Park, Shanghai, 201399, China
| | - Juntang Duan
- Shanghai Wild Animal Park, Shanghai, 201399, China
| | - Ke Zhao
- College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China
| | - Daifu Wu
- Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (SFGA) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, The China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda (CCRCGP), Dujiangyan, 611830, China
| | - Guo Li
- Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (SFGA) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, The China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda (CCRCGP), Dujiangyan, 611830, China
| | - Shengzhi Yang
- College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, 625014, Sichuan, China
| | - Xinfeng Han
- College of Veterinary Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China
| | - Yue Xie
- College of Veterinary Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China
| | - Yan Huang
- Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration (SFGA) on Conservation Biology of Rare Animals in the Giant Panda National Park, The China Conservation and Research Center for the Giant Panda (CCRCGP), Dujiangyan, 611830, China
| | - Xiumei Yu
- College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiawei Wu
- College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China
| | - Likou Zou
- College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee JH, Kim S, Kim ES, Keum GB, Doo H, Kwak J, Pandey S, Cho JH, Ryu S, Song M, Cho JH, Kim S, Kim HB. Comparative analysis of the pig gut microbiome associated with the pig growth performance. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2023; 65:856-864. [PMID: 37970497 PMCID: PMC10640952 DOI: 10.5187/jast.2022.e122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
There are a variety of microorganisms in the animal intestine, and it has been known that they play important roles in the host such as suppression of potentially pathogenic microorganisms, modulation of the gut immunity. In addition, the gut microbiota and the livestock growth performance have long been known to be related. Therefore, we evaluated the interrelation between the growth performance and the gut microbiome of the pigs from 3 different farms, with pigs of varied ages ready to be supplied to the market. When pigs reached average market weight of 118 kg, the average age of pigs in three different farms were < 180 days, about 190 days, and > 200 days, respectively. Fecal samples were collected from pigs of age of 70 days, 100 days, 130 days, and 160 days. The output data of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing by the Illumina Miseq platform was filtered and analyzed using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME)2, and the statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles (STAMP). The results of this study showed that the gut microbial communities shifted as pigs aged along with significant difference in the relative abundance of different phyla and genera in different age groups of pigs from each farm. Even though, there was no statistical differences among groups in terms of Chao1, the number of observed operational taxonomic units (OTUs), and the Shannon index, our results showed higher abundances of Bifidobacterium, Clostridium and Lactobacillus in the feces of pigs with rapid growth rate. These results will help us to elucidate important gut microbiota that can affect the growth performance of pigs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - San Kim
- BRD Korea, Hwaseong 18471,
Korea
| | - Eun Sol Kim
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Gi Beom Keum
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Hyunok Doo
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Jinok Kwak
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Sriniwas Pandey
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Jae Hyoung Cho
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Sumin Ryu
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Minho Song
- Division of Animal and Dairy Science,
Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
| | - Jin Ho Cho
- Division of Food and Animal Science,
Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
| | - Sheena Kim
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Hyeun Bum Kim
- Department of Animal Resources Science,
Dankook University, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mahmud MR, Jian C, Uddin MK, Huhtinen M, Salonen A, Peltoniemi O, Venhoranta H, Oliviero C. Impact of Intestinal Microbiota on Growth Performance of Suckling and Weaned Piglets. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0374422. [PMID: 37022154 PMCID: PMC10269657 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03744-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Small-scale studies investigating the relationship between pigs' intestinal microbiota and growth performance have generated inconsistent results. We hypothesized that on farms under favorable environmental conditions (e.g., promoting sow nest-building behavior, high colostrum production, low incidence of diseases and minimal use of antimicrobials), the piglet gut microbiota may develop toward a population that promotes growth and reduces pathogenic bacteria. Using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, we sampled and profiled the fecal microbiota from 170 individual piglets throughout suckling and postweaning periods (in total 670 samples) to track gut microbiota development and its potential association with growth. During the suckling period, the dominant genera were Lactobacillus and Bacteroides, the latter being gradually replaced by Clostridium sensu scricto 1 as piglets aged. The gut microbiota during the nursery stage, not the suckling period, predicted the average daily growth (ADG) of piglets. The relative abundances of SCFA-producing genera, in particular Faecalibacterium, Megasphaera, Mitsuokella, and Subdoligranulum, significantly correlated with high ADG of weaned piglets. In addition, the succession of the gut microbiota in high-ADG piglets occurred faster and stabilized sooner upon weaning, whereas the gut microbiota of low-ADG piglets continued to mature after weaning. Overall, our findings suggest that weaning is the major driver of gut microbiota variation in piglets with different levels of overall growth performance. This calls for further research to verify if promotion of specific gut microbiota, identified here at weaning transition, is beneficial for piglet growth. IMPORTANCE The relationship between pigs' intestinal microbiota and growth performance is of great importance for improving piglets' health and reducing antimicrobial use. We found that gut microbiota variation is significantly associated with growth during weaning and the early nursery period. Importantly, transitions toward a mature gut microbiota enriched with fiber-degrading bacteria mostly complete upon weaning in piglets with better growth. Postponing the weaning age may therefore favor the development of fiber degrading gut bacteria, conferring the necessary capacity to digest and harvest solid postweaning feed. The bacterial taxa associated with piglet growth identified herein hold potential to improve piglet growth and health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Rayhan Mahmud
- Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ching Jian
- Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Md Karim Uddin
- Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Anne Salonen
- Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Olli Peltoniemi
- Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Venhoranta
- Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Claudio Oliviero
- Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang X, Chen D, Du J, Cheng K, Fang C, Liao X, Liu Y, Sun J, Lian X, Ren H. Occupational exposure in swine farm defines human skin and nasal microbiota. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1117866. [PMID: 37065142 PMCID: PMC10090692 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1117866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Anthropogenic environments take an active part in shaping the human microbiome. Herein, we studied skin and nasal microbiota dynamics in response to the exposure in confined and controlled swine farms to decipher the impact of occupational exposure on microbiome formation. The microbiota of volunteers was longitudinally profiled in a 9-months survey, in which the volunteers underwent occupational exposure during 3-month internships in swine farms. By high-throughput sequencing, we showed that occupational exposure compositionally and functionally reshaped the volunteers’ skin and nasal microbiota. The exposure in farm A reduced the microbial diversity of skin and nasal microbiota, whereas the microbiota of skin and nose increased after exposure in farm B. The exposure in different farms resulted in compositionally different microbial patterns, as the abundance of Actinobacteria sharply increased at expense of Firmicutes after exposure in farm A, yet Proteobacteria became the most predominant in the volunteers in farm B. The remodeled microbiota composition due to exposure in farm A appeared to stall and persist, whereas the microbiota of volunteers in farm B showed better resilience to revert to the pre-exposure state within 9 months after the exposure. Several metabolic pathways, for example, the styrene, aminobenzoate, and N-glycan biosynthesis, were significantly altered through our PICRUSt analysis, and notably, the function of beta-lactam resistance was predicted to enrich after exposure in farm A yet decrease in farm B. We proposed that the differently modified microbiota patterns might be coordinated by microbial and non-microbial factors in different swine farms, which were always environment-specific. This study highlights the active role of occupational exposure in defining the skin and nasal microbiota and sheds light on the dynamics of microbial patterns in response to environmental conversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiran Wang
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Dongrui Chen
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Juan Du
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Ke Cheng
- Guangxi State Farms Yongxin Jinguang Animal Husbandry Group Co., Ltd, Nanning, China
| | - Chang Fang
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoping Liao
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Yahong Liu
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Jian Sun
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for the Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jian Sun,
| | - Xinlei Lian
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Xinlei Lian,
| | - Hao Ren
- Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics, Development and Safety Evaluation, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- Hao Ren,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bogaert D, van Beveren GJ, de Koff EM, Lusarreta Parga P, Balcazar Lopez CE, Koppensteiner L, Clerc M, Hasrat R, Arp K, Chu MLJN, de Groot PCM, Sanders EAM, van Houten MA, de Steenhuijsen Piters WAA. Mother-to-infant microbiota transmission and infant microbiota development across multiple body sites. Cell Host Microbe 2023; 31:447-460.e6. [PMID: 36893737 DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
Early-life microbiota seeding and subsequent development is crucial to future health. Cesarean-section (CS) birth, as opposed to vaginal delivery, affects early mother-to-infant transmission of microbes. Here, we assess mother-to-infant microbiota seeding and early-life microbiota development across six maternal and four infant niches over the first 30 days of life in 120 mother-infant pairs. Across all infants, we estimate that on average 58.5% of the infant microbiota composition can be attributed to any of the maternal source communities. All maternal source communities seed multiple infant niches. We identify shared and niche-specific host/environmental factors shaping the infant microbiota. In CS-born infants, we report reduced seeding of infant fecal microbiota by maternal fecal microbes, whereas colonization with breastmilk microbiota is increased when compared with vaginally born infants. Therefore, our data suggest auxiliary routes of mother-to-infant microbial seeding, which may compensate for one another, ensuring that essential microbes/microbial functions are transferred irrespective of disrupted transmission routes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debby Bogaert
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Gina J van Beveren
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Emma M de Koff
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Paula Lusarreta Parga
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ Edinburgh, UK
| | - Carlos E Balcazar Lopez
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lilian Koppensteiner
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ Edinburgh, UK
| | - Melanie Clerc
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ Edinburgh, UK
| | - Raiza Hasrat
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Kayleigh Arp
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Mei Ling J N Chu
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter C M de Groot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Spaarne Gasthuis, 2035 RC Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wouter A A de Steenhuijsen Piters
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ortiz Sanjuán JM, Manzanilla EG, Cabrera-Rubio R, Crispie F, Cotter PD, Garrido JJ, Argüello H. Using Shotgun Sequencing to Describe the Changes Induced by In-Feed Zinc Oxide and Apramycin in the Microbiomes of Pigs One Week Postweaning. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0159722. [PMID: 35950862 PMCID: PMC9431492 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01597-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Postweaning diarrhea (PWD) is a relevant problem associated with early weaning on pig farms. For decades, in-feed antibiotics and therapeutic zinc oxide (ZnO) have been widely used to prevent PWD in piglets. The European Union is banning both strategies in 2022 due to antimicrobial resistance and environmental contamination concerns, respectively. Understanding the effects of these products on the pig microbiome is crucial for correcting potential microbial disbalances that would prompt PWD. Using shotgun sequencing, three trials were carried out to explore the impact of in-feed apramycin and ZnO, combined with different farm hygiene protocols, on the fecal microbiomes of piglets 7 days postweaning. In trial 1, 28-day-old piglets were allocated to one of three groups: control diet (Ct), Ct + ZnO (Zn), and Ct + apramycin (Ab). In trials 2 and 3, piglets were allocated to the same treatments, but the trials also included different cleaning protocols, achieving different hygiene levels. In-feed treatments impacted the richness, diversity, and relative abundance of the piglets' microbiome more than hygiene. Pigs in the Ct group showed higher species richness than pigs in the Ab and Zn groups. A clustering analysis evidenced a link between Enterobacteriaceae in the Ct group; Lactobacillaceae and Veillonellaceae mainly in the Ct group; and Bacteroidaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Oscillospiraceae, Acidaminococcaceae, and Lactobacillaceae in the Ab and Zn groups. Functional data analysis revealed a higher abundance of virulence genes in the Ct group microbiomes and heavy metal and antimicrobial resistance-related functions in the Zn treatment group. The results demonstrate that alternatives to Ab and ZnO should balance the microbial abundance and stimulate the growth of commensals to outcompete potential pathogens. IMPORTANCE Weaning is a critical period for piglets, during which potentially harmful bacteria such as Escherichia coli can increase in abundance in the intestine, creating digestive problems and diarrhea. In-feed antibiotics, the most frequent administration route for antibiotics in livestock, and therapeutic doses of zinc oxide (ZnO) help to control diarrhea but prompt secondary problems such as antimicrobial resistance and soil pollution from heavy metals. Understanding how these strategies impact the gut microbiota is crucial for establishing health biomarkers and designing successful replacement strategies. Using shotgun sequencing, this study compares the microbiota of pigs after early weaning when treated with in-feed antibiotics, ZnO, or treatment-free diets to describe differences that could define the susceptibility to infections, providing the basis for future research on improving intestinal resilience through microbiota-based strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan M. Ortiz Sanjuán
- Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland
- Grupo de Genómica y Mejora Animal, Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Edgar G. Manzanilla
- Pig Development Department, Teagasc Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Raúl Cabrera-Rubio
- Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland
- APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, County Cork, Ireland
| | - Fiona Crispie
- Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland
- APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, County Cork, Ireland
| | - Paul D. Cotter
- Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland
- APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, County Cork, Ireland
- VistaMilk SFI Research Centre, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland
| | - Juan J. Garrido
- Grupo de Genómica y Mejora Animal, Departamento de Genética, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Héctor Argüello
- Animal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen W, Ma J, Jiang Y, Deng L, Lv N, Gao J, Cheng J, Liang JB, Wang Y, Lan T, Liao X, Mi J. Selective Maternal Seeding and Rearing Environment From Birth to Weaning Shape the Developing Piglet Gut Microbiome. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:795101. [PMID: 35547153 PMCID: PMC9083071 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.795101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The acquisition and development of the mammalian microbiome early in life are critical to establish a healthy host-microbiome symbiosis. Despite recent advances in understanding microbial sources in infants, the relative contribution of various microbial sources to the colonization of the gut microbiota in pigs remains unclear. Here, we longitudinally sampled the microbiota of 20 sow-piglet pairs (three piglets per sow) reared under identical conditions from multiple body sites and the surrounding weaning environment from birth to 28 days postpartum (1,119 samples in total). Source-tracking analysis revealed that the contribution of various microbial sources to the piglet gut microbiome gradually changed over time. The neonatal microbiota was initially sparsely populated, and the predominant contribution was from the maternal vaginal microbiota that increased gradually from 69.0% at day 0 to 89.3% at day 3 and dropped to 0.28% at day 28. As the piglets aged, the major microbial community patterns were most strongly associated with the sow feces and slatted floor, with contributions increasing from 0.52 and 9.6% at day 0 to 62.1 and 33.8% at day 28, respectively. The intestinal microbial diversity, composition, and function significantly changed as the piglets aged, and 30 age-discriminatory bacterial taxa were identified with distinctive time-dependent shifts in their relative abundance, which likely reflected the effect of the maternal and environmental microbial sources on the selection and adaptation of the piglet gut microbiota. Overall, these data demonstrate that the vaginal microbiota is the primary source of the gut microbiota in piglets within 3 days after birth and are gradually replaced by the sow fecal and slatted floor microbiota over time. These findings may offer novel strategies to promote the establishment of exogenous symbiotic microbes to improve piglet gut health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chen
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Guangzhou, Chain
| | - Jingyun Ma
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yiming Jiang
- Institute of Virology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.,Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Li Deng
- Institute of Virology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.,Institute of Virology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ning Lv
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Guangzhou, Chain
| | - Jinming Gao
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian Cheng
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Juan Boo Liang
- Laboratory of Sustainable Animal Production and Biodiversity, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | - Yan Wang
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Guangzhou, Chain
| | - Tian Lan
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Guangzhou, Chain
| | - Xindi Liao
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Guangzhou, Chain.,Key Laboratory of Animal Health Aquaculture and Environmental Control, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiandui Mi
- College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Guangzhou, Chain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Johnson AK, Rault JL, Marchant JN, Baxter EM, O'Driscoll K. Improving young pig welfare on-farm: The Five Domains Model. J Anim Sci 2022; 100:6583200. [PMID: 35536191 PMCID: PMC9202571 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Considering welfare through the "neonatal and nursery pig perspective" is an exciting approach, and one that resonates with consumers. Overlaying this with the Five Domains Model, as we suggest in this review, points to practical on-farm improvements that provide each pig the opportunity to experience positive mental states. The Five Domains Model is broken into physical and functional states, that includes Domain 1 Nutrition, Domain 2 Physical Environment, Domain 3 Health and, Domain 4 Behavioral Interaction, and Domain 5 Mental State. The Five Domains Model can build on the breadth and depth of swine welfare science to highlight opportunities to improve welfare on-farm. In Domain 1 management of increasingly large litters is considered, with examples of sow vs. artificial rearing, colostrum quality and quantity, and creep feed management strategies. Efforts can result in positive mental states such as feeling full and content and the ability to experience pleasure of drinking and food tastes/smells. Domain 2 considers space complexity and access to key resources, along with thermal and physical amenities, to promote feelings of physical comfort. Domain 3 considers pig health in three broad, yet inter-linking categories, (a) congenital and hereditary health, (b) environmental pathogen load and, (c) colostrum quality and quantity, and its effect on the microbiome. Improvements can result in a pig that displays vitality and feels healthy. Domain 4 provides the pig opportunities to express its rich behavioral repertoire, specifically positive social interactions, play, and exploration. These efforts can result in pigs feeling calm, safe, comfortable, having companionship, engaged, interested and rewarded. In conclusion, using the Five Domains Model can highlight numerous opportunities to improve current and future housing and management through the "neonatal and nursery pig perspective" with a focus on inducing positive mental states that can result in improved quality of life and welfare state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Johnson
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50001, USA.,Iowa Pork Industry Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50001, USA
| | - J-L Rault
- Institute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, A-1210, Austria
| | - J N Marchant
- USDA-ARS Livestock Behavior Research Unit, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - E M Baxter
- Animal Behaviour and Welfare, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Research Group, SRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
| | - K O'Driscoll
- Pig Development Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy Co. Cork, P61 C997, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|