Effect of moderate dosage of chlorpropamide in pregnancy on fetal outcome

The influence of D-chiro-inositol and D-myo-inositol in pregnant women with glucose intolerance

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that the use of inositol and folic acid from the first trimester of pregnancy, counteracts the onset of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in women at risk, preserving the infants from macrosomia, hypoglycemia and preterm delivery. The authors collected data from the pregnant women at the laboratory (Unit of Cytogenic and Molecular Genetics), from January 2014 to April 2016, all with first trimester fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >92 mg/dl. A total of 40 women were treated with 250 mg/day D-chiro-inositol, 1.75 g/day D-myo-inositol, 12.5 mg/day zinc, 10 mg/day methylsulfonylmethane, 400 µg/day 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid. The other 43 women (control group) were treated with only 400 µg/day folic acid. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of maternal GDM. The secondary outcome measures were the incidence of fetal macrosomia, preterm delivery and neonatal hypoglycemia. At the 24th week of pregnancy, the incidence of maternal GDM was recorded in 18 women in the control group and in 5 women in the treated group [relative risk (RR)=3.35; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.37-8.17; P=0.0028). A significant difference was observed between treated and control groups in terms of risk of macrosomia. A total of seven infants in the control group, and two in the treated group, weighed >4,000 g (RR=5,12; 95% CI=1.21-21.68; P=0.0099). No significant difference was identified between two groups, regarding the other two secondary outcomes, neonatal hypoglycemia (RR=4.650; 95% CI=0.57-38.11; P=0.1086) and preterm delivery (RR=1.74; 95% CI=0.83-3.66; P=0.1301). The current study demonstrated the potential benefit of supplementation with the association of D-chiro-inositol and D-myo-inositol in pregnant 'at risk' women, with first trimester FPG >92 mg/dl, in preventing the onset of maternal GDM and macrosomia in newborns.

Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common morbidities complicating pregnancy, with short- and long-term consequences to the mothers, fetuses, and newborns. Management and treatment are aimed to achieve best possible glycemic control, while avoiding hypoglycemia and ensuring maternal and fetal safety. It involves behavioral modifications, nutrition and medications, if needed; concurrent with maternal and fetal surveillance for possible adverse outcomes. This review aims to elaborate on the pharmacological options for GDM therapy. We performed an extensive literature review of different available studies, published during the last 50 years, concerning pharmacological therapy for GDM, dealing with safety and efficacy, for both fetal and maternal morbidity consequences; as well as failure and success in establishing appropriate metabolic and glucose control. Oral medication therapy is a safe and effective treatment modality for GDM and in some circumstances may serve as first-line therapy when nutritional modifications fail. When oral agents fail to establish glucose control then insulin injections should be added. Determining the best oral therapy in inconclusive, although it seems that metformin is slightly superior to glyburide, in some aspects. As for parenteral therapy, all insulins listed in this article are considered both safe and effective for treatment of hyperglycemia during pregnancy. Importantly, a better safety profile, with similar efficacy is documented for most analogues. As GDM prevalence rises, there is a need for successful monitoring and treatment for patients. Caregivers should know the possible and available therapeutic options.

Using oral agents to manage gestational diabetes: what have we learned?

Insulin has been the mainstay of treatment of diabetes during pregnancy for decades. Although glyburide and metformin are classified as category B during pregnancy, recent research has suggested that these oral agents alone or in conjunction with insulin may be safe for the treatment of gestational diabetes (GDM). This paper summarizes the data on the use of glyburide and metformin for treatment of GDM.

Preditores de sucesso da metformina no tratamento do diabetes mellitus gestacional

OBJETIVOS: identificar características maternas relacionadas à falha no tratamento do diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) com metformina. MÉTODOS: estudo retrospectivo observacional (julho/2008-setembro/ 2010), com 104 gestantes com DMG que necessitaram de terapêutica complementar a dietoterapia e utilizaram metformina. Dividiram-se em dois grupos: sucesso terapêutico (n=82), onde a droga foi mantida até o parto; outro com falha terapêutica (n=22) onde a droga foi substituída por insulina. Variáveis maternas estudadas: idade, número de partos, ganho de peso na gestação, glicemia de jejum (GJ) e 2h no OGTT75g, idade gestacional de diagnóstico de DMG (IGDMG). Variáveis do recém nascido: incidência de RNs GIG e hipoglicemia neonatal. Foram comparadas as características clínico-metabólicas maternas e os resultados perinatais, o nível de significância utilizado foi de 5%. RESULTADOS: apresentaram diferença na IGDMG (27,5 vs 24,3 semanas; p=0,02), no índice de massa corporal (IMC) (27,5 vs 31,6 kg/m²; p=0,01), e GJ no OGTT75g (91,5 vs 108 mg/dL; p=0,02), nos grupos de sucesso e falha respectivamente. A falha terapêutica aumentou o índice ponderal dos RNs (2,8 vs 3 g/cm³; p=0,05), incidência de RNs GIG (4,9 vs 22,7%; p=0,02) e hipoglicemia neonatal (6,1 vs 18,2%; p=0,04). Os dados dos RNs foram objetivos secundários. CONCLUSÕES: o diagnóstico precoce, o maior IMC e maior GJ OGTT75g estiveram mais relacionados a falha terapêutica.

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in pregnancy: An Update

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, insulin has been the gold standard in the management of Type 2 diabetes in pregnancy and gestational diabetes. However, insulin therapy can be inconvenient because of the needs for multiple injections, its associated cost, pain at the injection site, need for refrigeration, and skillful handling of the syringes. This has led to the exploration of oral hypoglycemic agents as an alternative to insulin therapy.

OBJECTIVES

This review examines and evaluates the evidences on the efficacy, safety, and current recommendations of oral hypoglycemic agents.

CONCLUSION

The evidence of this study supports the use of glyburide and metformin in the management of Type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes with no increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia or congenital anomalies. The safety of these oral hypoglycemic agents are limited to the prenatal period and more randomized controlled trials are required to provide information on the long-term follow up on neonatal and cognitive development.

Treatment of gestational diabetes: oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin?

Our report aims to verify whether perinatal maternal glycemic control in gestational diabetes can only be achieved with insulin or with oral hypoglycaemic agents. Then we want to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral hypoglycemic agents in the treatment of gestational diabetes and then to compare these results with those associated with the use of insulin.

Metformin compared with glyburide for the management of gestational diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To assess blood glucose control and neonatal outcomes when women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were treated with metformin or glyburide.

METHODS

When an appropriate diet was insufficient to control their blood glucose levels, women with GDM were randomized to a glyburide or a metformin treatment group. If the maximum dose was reached, the assessed drug was replaced by insulin. The primary outcome measures analyzed were maternal glucose levels during pregnancy, birth weight, and neonatal glucose levels.

RESULTS

The only significant difference in outcome between the 2 treatment drugs was that maternal weight gain during pregnancy was less in the metformin (n=40) than in the glyburide group (n=32) (10.3 kg vs 7.6 kg; P=0.02). No differences were found in treatment failure, mean level of fasting or postprandial plasma glucose, rate of participants with glycated hemoglobin, birth weight, rate of large-for-gestational-age newborns, or newborns with hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of GDM with metformin or glyburide was found to be equivalent for both women and newborns.

Can Pregnant Diabetics be Treated with Glyburide?

Until the last decade, oral hypoglycemic agents have not been recommended in pregnancy owing to fear of their potential adverse fetal effects, including teratogenicity and neonatal hypoglycemia. However, the evidence in support of these recommendations is weak and is principally based on case series involving the use of first-generation sulfonylureas. Studies using a single-cotyledon placental model have found glyburide to only minimally cross the placenta, an observation that paved the way for a landmark randomized clinical trial that found glyburide to be as safe and effective as insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Still, contradicting results regarding its trans-placental transfer, lack of adequate data regarding its safety during the first trimester and reports of increased neonatal morbidity raise concerns regarding the universal application of glyburide as an alternative to insulin therapy in diabetic pregnant women. Thus, there is a need for large, randomized, controlled trials with adequate power to evaluate the possibility of increased neonatal metabolic complications as well as the long-term outcome of infants born to mothers treated with glyburide and insulin. Unless future studies refute current data regarding the efficacy and safety of glyburide, we believe that, owing to its ease of administration, convenience and low cost, glyburide will become the first line of medical treatment in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus within the next few years.

Oral anti-hyperglycemic agents for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus

The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview for understanding the management guidelines of gestational diabetes. The rationale for the use of oral antidiabetic drugs is provided based on validation by appropriately conducted research trials. Concerns over teratogenicity due to possible placental transfer, neonatal and maternal outcome, and basic pharmacologic benefits are addressed.

Recent advances in the treatment of gestational diabetes

Despite four decades of research there is a lack of international consensus on the screening, diagnosis, treatment and follow up of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Currently, GDM is managed by diet modification, exercise and exogenous human insulin. During the last decade, several insulin analogues and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs have revolutionised the management of diabetes mellitus in non-pregnant women. Most of these recent drugs still remain investigational in GDM due to concerns about their safety in pregnancy. This review will focus primarily on the pharmacological treatment of GDM. It will objectively assess the value of these exciting new drugs in pregnancy as they could potentially benefit every woman with GDM.

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents in Pregnancy

Pregnancies in diabetic women are associated with increased risk of spontaneous abortion, congenital malformations, preeclampsia, preterm labor, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, and cesarean section. Advances in antepartum cares and strict adherence to dietary and insulin regimens have been shown to significantly reduce the rate of maternal morbidity as well as perinatal morbidity and mortality. Historically, reports of potential fetal teratogenicity and hypoglycemic effects on the fetus contraindicated the use of oral hypoglycemic agents in pregnancies complicated with either type II diabetes mellitus (DM) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Recently, physicians increasingly prescribe newer generations of oral hypoglycemic agents to treat GDM and type II DM to pregnant patients. This review addresses the safety, current recommendations, and controversies surrounding use of the available oral hypoglycemic agents during pregnancy.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the mechanisms of actions of the various oral hypoglycemic agents, to list the known side effects of these agents, and to summarize the data on the use of these agents during pregnancy.

Oral hypoglycemic agents in pregnancy: their time has come

Oral agents are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for non-pregnant women with type 2 diabetes. It has been proposed that, owing to the similarity between gestational and type 2 diabetes, some of these drugs could be used effectively and safely as alternatives to insulin therapy. This efficacious alternative provides the physician with more choices that, in turn, translate into more complex decision-making for the management of gestational diabetes. This article illustrates the pharmacological characteristics of oral hypoglycemic agents and placental transfer, provides evidence for the lack of association between congenital anomalies and the drugs, and reviews current studies and the clinical outcomes when these drugs are used.

Use of antidiabetes agents in pregnancy: current practice and controversy

Prior to the discovery of insulin, the combination of diabetes and pregnancy was considered potentially lethal. Advances in the care of diabetes, combined with advances in antepartum fetal testing, have reduced maternal and perinatal mortality outcomes to levels expected in nondiabetic pregnancies. As new oral antidiabetes medications are introduced, the safety and efficacy of using them during pregnancy are under investigation. This article describes the oral medications currently available to treat diabetes, reviews the body of research available on these agents, and discusses current recommendations and controversies.

Oral hypoglycemic agents and the pregnant diabetic: "from bench to bedside"

Today, the criteria for diagnosis and treatment have evolved into an evidence-based medicine approach. The need for evidence-based information is especially critical in the management of gestational diabetes, in general, and especially in the use of oral hypoglycemic agents. These agents have been categorically contraindicated for decades in the United States based on anecdotal and/or weak evidence for these recommendations. In this article, the similarities between gestational and type 2 diabetes are described and the rationale for the use of oral hypoglycemic agents for the treatment of both are discussed. The author will show how research from basic sciences (placental transfers) to clinical studies (perinatal outcome) can lead to significant evidence on which to base management recommendations.

When diet fails: insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents as alternatives for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus

The principal approach for attaining glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus is diet, with the addition of insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents when needed. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview for the understanding of management guidelines that have been validated by appropriately conducted research trials. The similarity between gestational diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes is highlighted. Criteria for insulin initiation as well as the role of a hypoglycemic agent as a potential alternative to insulin are discussed.

A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus are rarely treated with a sulfonylurea drug, because of concern about teratogenicity and neonatal hypoglycemia. There is little information about the efficacy of these drugs in this group of women.

METHODS

We studied 404 women with singleton pregnancies and gestational diabetes that required treatment. The women were randomly assigned between 11 and 33 weeks of gestation to receive glyburide or insulin according to an intensified treatment protocol. The primary end point was achievement of the desired level of glycemic control. Secondary end points included maternal and neonatal complications.

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SD) pretreatment blood glucose concentration as measured at home for one week was 114+/-19 mg per deciliter (6.4+/-1.1 mmol per liter) in the glyburide group and 116+/-22 mg per deciliter (6.5+/-1.2 mmol per liter) in the insulin group (P=0.33). The mean concentrations during treatment were 105+/-16 mg per deciliter (5.9+/-0.9 mmol per liter) in the glyburide group and 105+/-18 mg per deciliter (5.9+/-1.0 mmol per liter) in the insulin group (P=0.99). Eight women in the glyburide group (4 percent) required insulin therapy. There were no significant differences between the glyburide and insulin groups in the percentage of infants who were large for gestational age (12 percent and 13 percent, respectively); who had macrosomia, defined as a birth weight of 4000 g or more (7 percent and 4 percent); who had lung complications (8 percent and 6 percent); who had hypoglycemia (9 percent and 6 percent); who were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (6 percent and 7 percent); or who had fetal anomalies (2 percent and 2 percent). The cord-serum insulin concentrations were similar in the two groups, and glyburide was not detected in the cord serum of any infant in the glyburide group.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with gestational diabetes, glyburide is a clinically effective alternative to insulin therapy.

Comparative placental transport of oral hypoglycemic agents in humans: a model of human placental drug transfer

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the human placental transport of glyburide, glipizide, chlorpropamide, and tolbutamide.

STUDY DESIGN

The recirculating single cotyledon human placenta model tested maternal-to-fetal transport in term placentas perfused immediately after delivery. Drug levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid scintillation spectrometry, and transport rates were calculated by comparing maternal and fetal concentrations.

RESULTS

The transport of these substances differed significantly over a tenfold range (analysis of variance, p < 0.0008). A significant association exists by multiple linear regression between drug transfer and molecular weight, dissociation constant, and the octanol-water partition coefficient (R2 = 0.91, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability in human placental transfer rates of the oral hypoglycemics, which strongly correlates with molecular properties. These data suggest that less fetal exposure may occur with second-generation sulfonylureas and anticipate that regression models may be useful in selecting agents that minimize placental transport to the fetus.

Insignificant transfer of glyburide occurs across the human placenta

No data exist concerning human placental transfer of oral hypoglycemic agents during pregnancy. This study characterizes the transport of glyburide in 10 term human placentas with the single-cotyledon placental model. Serial samples were taken from both the maternal and fetal reservoirs during each 3-hour perfusion, and the percent transport and metabolism of tritiated glyburide was calculated with liquid scintillation spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. Antipyrine labeled with carbon 14 was added to the perfusate solution during these experiments as a control. Virtually no transfer of glyburide occurred, and no appreciable metabolism of the drug was detected. Neither variation in the albumin concentration nor increase in the maternal glyburide levels to 100 times therapeutic concentration materially altered the rate of transport. These data show that insignificant transport of glyburide occurs across the human placenta in vitro and suggest that fetal exposure to maternally administered glyburide likewise may be insignificant.

Diabetes and diet in pregnancy

The mean additional energy requirement for pregnancy has been calculated at 285 kcal daily and it reflects the energy needs for production of the fetoplacental unit and for the maternal physiological adaptations to pregnancy. In practice there is considerable variation in energy requirement due to alterations in maternal energy expenditure. Optimal energy intakes are dictated also by the pre-pregnancy maternal weight. The outcome of pregnancy is improved in the underweight mother by an intake which produces a weight gain in pregnancy of approximately 14 kg, whereas a rise of only 7 kg may be optimal for the obese mother. Obesity with or without diabetes is associated with macrosomia and other problems and it is sensible to attempt to limit weight gain in pregnancy at a time when maternal motivation is high. Diabetes in pregnancy may arise in patients with pre-existing NIDDM or IDDM, but more commonly it is diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy and it usually disappears after delivery (gestational diabetes). Recent evidence suggests that gestational diabetes has a strong genetic component and is usually NIDDM precipitated early in life by the pregnancy. Both gestational diabetes and NIDDM are characterized by insulin deficiency and by insulin resistance. Long-term follow-up studies have demonstrated that NIDDM or impaired glucose tolerance develop in later life in 50-70% of women with previous gestational diabetes. The adverse effects of pregnancy on the mother with pre-existing diabetes may be minimized by good diabetic control as may be adverse effects on the fetus and neonate of diabetes in the mother. An increased incidence of fetal malformations persists in pregnancies with pre-existing maternal diabetes. Diabetes of any form may be associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia. The aim of therapy is to produce maternal normoglycaemia throughout pregnancy by dietary measures and insulin treatment if required. Women with pre-existing diabetes should tighten their blood glucose control from before conception. Optimization of insulin therapy and diet are required for IDDM and most NIDDM women will require insulin treatment in pregnancy. Gestational diabetics require diet and possibly insulin. Most pregnancies now proceed to term.

Management of the pregnant diabetic patient

The prognosis in diabetic pregnancy has greatly improved as a result of patient education and the availability of home blood glucose monitoring techniques enabling the implementation of good metabolic control pre-pregnancy, antenatal and intrapartum. These in turn have made possible the benefits to the offspring of vaginal delivery at term. Screening for gestational diabetes is important and the prognosis is also good where maternal normoglycaemia is achieved. All diabetic pregnancies should be cared for in specialist units under the supervision of an integrated team comprising an obstetrician, diabetologist and paediatrician, and for optimal results care should start prior to conception.

Chlorpropamide in pregnancy and transient neonatal diabetes insipidus

Images