Risk for lower intestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in comparison to treatment with other biologic or conventional synthetic DMARDs

Newer Immunosuppressants for Rheumatologic Disease: Preoperative Considerations

With the advent of small-molecule immune modulators, recombinant fusion proteins, and monoclonal antibodies, treatment options for patients with rheumatic diseases are now broad. These agents carry significant risks and an individualized approach to each patient, balancing known risks and benefits, remains the most prudent course. This review summarizes the available immunosuppressant treatments, discusses their perioperative implications, and provides recommendations for their perioperative management.

Role of rheumatoid arthritis registries worldwide: What have they taught us?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common rheumatic conditions, impacting quality of life on several domains. Major breakthroughs have been achieved over the past three decades in the management benefitting the patients' lives. With increasing as well as novel treatment options, clinical registries have been established and continuously evolve to portray patient characteristics, monitor disease activity of RA, effectiveness and safety of the novel compounds. The greatest insights derived from registries is our current knowledge on the risks for malignancies and infections but also extending our knowledge collected in clinical trials on comparative effectiveness, long-term drug utilisation and under-represented populations. Moreover, the possible evolution of registries involving Big Data and AI, and the increased focus on patient centredness is discussed.

Update on tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by joint pain, swelling, and stiffness, affecting approximately 1% of the adult population. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has emerged as an effective treatment for RA. This narrative review provides an update on TCZ's efficacy and safety based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE). TCZ, available in subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) formulations, has shown significant benefits in RA management. Key clinical trials, including SAMURAI, OPTION, RADIATE, and TOWARD, have demonstrated TCZ's efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), particularly in patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate or TNF inhibitors. Long-term studies, such as STREAM, have highlighted TCZ's sustained efficacy and favorable safety profile over 5 years. The impact of TCZ on cardiovascular health, lipid profiles, and the risk of infections has been a focal point, with findings suggesting no significant increase in cardiovascular disease risk compared to other RA therapies. RWE further highlights the effectiveness of TCZ, identifying predictors of response, such as age, and emphasizes its suitability for biologic-naïve and overweight patients. Special considerations include TCZ use in RA-associated interstitial lung disease and amyloidosis. Overall, TCZ remains a pivotal option in RA treatment, with a well-established safety and efficacy profile supported by extensive clinical and real-world data.

Performance of ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in the evaluation of skin atrophy in patients with long-term oral glucocorticoid therapy in a tertiary rheumatology center

Ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (UHF-US) allows visualization of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis and precise measurement of skin thickness. The aim of this study was to assess the performance and interobserver reliability of UHF-US for measuring skin thickness in patients with long-term systemic glucocorticoid (GC) therapy compared to patients without GC therapy or treated for a shorter period.156 patients with known or suspected inflammatory rheumatic diseases underwent US evaluation for skin thickness by 3 experts in 3 anatomical sites (hand, distal, and proximal forearm). 87 patients were classified as "frequent users" who had received continuous oral GCs for at least one year or at least 3 years with various interruptions. 69 patients without any oral GC therapy in the past or treated for a shorter period were classified as "non-frequent users".UHF-US allowed a precise measurement of skin thickness. Skin thickness at all 3 anatomical sites was significantly decreased in "frequent users" of GCs compared to "non-frequent users" (distal and proximal forearm: p < 0.001; hand: p < 0.05). At all 3 anatomical sites, skin thickness was decreased in patients with clinically assessed parchment-like skin compared to patients without parchment-like skin (distal and proximal forearm: p < 0.001; hand: p < 0.05). Interobserver variability was excellent [hand intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.99; proximal forearm ICC = 0.85; distal forearm ICC = 0.84].These data support the idea of UHF-US as an objective and reliable imaging tool for monitoring skin atrophy as adverse effects of GC therapy.

Nontraumatic terminal ileal perforation in a patient with resistant palindromic rheumatism treated with sarilumab: A case report

Intestinal perforation, a rare complication of interleukin (IL)-6 therapy for immune-mediated diseases (mainly rheumatoid arthritis), typically manifests in the lower gastrointestinal tract, often in association with prior history of diverticulitis. Patients may present with acute abdominal pain and suspicion for this complication should remain high even in the absence of elevated C-reactive protein. We describe a 69-year-old female patient with a history of resistant seropositive palindromic rheumatism treated with sarilumab who developed a nontraumatic terminal ileal perforation.

Multiple Ulcers with Perforations of the Small Intestine in the Acute Phase of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy Possibly Associated with Tocilizumab Administration

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is associated with potentially life-threatening immunological toxicities. We herein report an 81-year-old woman who experienced multiple perforations in the small intestine 8 days after tisagenlecleucel infusion for relapsed and refractory follicular lymphoma with no gastrointestinal involvement. A pathological examination of the resected small intestine revealed multiple ulcers that formed after resection but without lymphoma involvement. Based on these findings, tocilizumab used for cytokine release syndrome was considered to be associated with these lesions. This case illustrates a previously undescribed but serious sequela of CAR T-cell therapy, calling for relevant personnel to be vigilant about gastrointestinal symptoms.

A bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2024 reveals research hotspots and trends in the immunotherapy for vasculitis

Using bibliometric analysis, this study attempted to provide an overview of the current state of research and key findings regarding the immunotherapy for vasculitis in general. We gathered the literature from the Web of Science (WOS) database covering the last 20 years (2004-2024) pertaining to the immunotherapy for vasculitis, and we used Citespace to evaluate the mapping of knowledge. The findings demonstrated that there were 572 articles concerning the immunotherapy for vasculitis, with a faster growth after 2018. The USA, Assistance Publique Hopitaux Paris, and Cornelia M are the nation, organization, and writer with the highest number of publications. Daxini A (2018) is the most frequently mentioned reference as well (26). Prominent universities and developed nations form the finest alliances for research on immunotherapy for vasculitis researches. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Wegener's granulomatosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus are Three research hotspots in this field.

IL-6R Inhibitors and Gastrointestinal Perforations: A Pharmacovigilance Study and a Predicting Nomogram

Objective IL-6R inhibitors are widely used in many inflammation-related diseases, especially so during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, their relationship with gastrointestinal perforations (GIPs) has been reported more and more. We comprehensively analyzed IL-6R inhibitors in association with GIPs from the United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: A disproportionate analysis was used to quantify the signals of GIPs caused by IL-6R inhibitors using two algorithms, and we assessed the risk using logistic regression analysis. We also established a risk prediction model of GIPs. Results: We identified 994 cases with GIPs of IL-6R inhibitors (tocilizumab and sarilumab) from the FAERS database. The GIPs signals of IL-6R inhibitors were significant, including tocilizumab (reporting odds ratio [ROR] 6.86, 95%CI 6.43-7.31) and sarilumab (ROR 4.03, 95%CI 2.83-5.73). Duodenal perforation had the strongest signals of tocilizumab (n = 312; ROR 19.45, 95%CI 17.33-21.83; IC025 3.72) and sarilumab (n = 14; ROR 9.57, 95%CI 5.66-16.17; IC025 1.92). The median time to GIPs was near 60 days. In total, 71% of the cases occurred within the first six months after tocilizumab treatment. After excluding missing data, we found that independent risk factors included female (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.16-1.98), ≥40 years (OR 5.63, 95%CI 1.78-17.78), glucocorticoids (OR 1.37, 95%CI 1.10-1.72), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, OR 3.46, 95%CI 2.77-4.32). The risk prediction model showed good discrimination and clinical applicability in both the training (AUC, 0.73) and validation (AUC, 0.75) sets. Conclusions: IL-6R inhibitors may increase the risk of GIPs, especially female, middle-aged patients, IL-6R inhibitors, NSAIDs, and glucocorticoids. Therefore, we suggest that these factors associated with gastrointestinal reactions should be considered during treatment.

Assessment of adverse events related to anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies using the FDA adverse event reporting system: a real-world pharmacovigilance study

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) monoclonal antibodies are commonly acknowledged for their efficacy in managing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, there remains a paucity of comprehensive studies on their potential adverse effects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a retrospective pharmacovigilance investigation. We employed FAERS using OpenVigil FDA to detect adverse reactions linked to the interleukin-6 antagonist tocilizumab and sarilumab.

RESULTS

Completely 67,976 reports were identified as 'primary suspected (PS)' adverse events (AEs) for tocilizumab, and 12,560 reports for sarilumab. 109 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) of tocilizumab and 158 PTs of sarilumab were retained. A higher incidence of adverse reactions occurred in females aged 45-64 years, with a higher rate of subsequent hospitalization. Both drugs exhibited adverse reactions consistent with previously reported side effects, such as leukopenia, elevated liver enzymes, and hypercholesterolemia. Additionally, there was a strong correlation with gastrointestinal issues. Unexpected significant adverse events, including diabetes, fluctuations in blood pressure, drug ineffectiveness, malignancies, and disorders of the nervous system, were also observed. Gender and age differences existed in AEs signals related to IL-6RAs.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified significant new AE signals for interleukin-6 receptor antagonists, potentially supporting clinical monitoring and risk identification for this class of drugs.

Rectum necrosis in a patient with severe COVID19 infection after CAR-T therapy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) can cause gastrointestinal complications as well as respiratory tract disease. Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis frequently occur in COVID19, especially in cases with severe clinical outcome. The relationship between gastrointestinal perforation and coagulopathy due to COVID19 remains unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 49-year-old female received Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy for an early recurrence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) that was refractory to chemotherapy. She was diagnosed with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) because of a fever and oxygen desaturation, and administered tocilizumab. Forty days after completing CAR-T therapy, she was infected with COVID19 and transferred to our hospital. Her general condition worsened and she developed COVID19 pneumonia, and then steroid pulse therapy was started. While her respiratory condition improved, she experienced pain in the anal region and computed tomography (CT) revealed a rectal perforation. An emergency surgery was undertaken, and the lower rectum wall was found to be completely necrotic. Removal of the necrotic part of the rectum tissue, and drainage and lavage of necrotic tissue in the pelvic cavity were performed. The remaining rectum was resected with partial sigmoidectomy, but we could not make the anal stump closed. In addition, an end colostomy in the sigmoid colon was performed. Histopathological findings showed thromboses in the rectal mesentery veins. After the first surgery, the pelvic abscess cavity persisted and her high-grade fever continued. Reoperation was laparoscopically performed, and she underwent a resection of anal canal with residual necrotic rectal and mesorectal tissue, and a drainage of the pelvic abscess. After the reoperation, her general condition improved and CT showed that the abscess cavity had significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrointestinal perforation, especially rectal necrosis due to coagulopathy caused by severe COVID19 infection, is a rare but life-threatening complication. Physicians should have a high degree of clinical suspicion for timely diagnosis and management, and surgical intervention is necessary in cases of rectal necrosis.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Perforation in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Exposed to Janus Kinase Inhibitors Versus Adalimumab: A Nationwide Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of gastrointestinal perforation (GIP), a rare but serious adverse event, in patients who a JAK inhibitor (JAKi; tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) versus adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) among a comprehensive real-world population of patients with rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of the French national health data system, the exposed group that received a JAKi and the comparison group adalimumab. We included all individuals with a rheumatic disease who had their first dispensation of these treatments from July 2017 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of GIP (end of follow-up May 2022). Weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) were estimated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to account for confounding factors. Concomitant administration of systemic glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and proton-pump inhibitors were time-varying variables.

RESULTS

The cohort included 39,758 patients: 12,335 and 27,423 in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab (mean age 58.2 and 47.3 years; female 76% and 58%; rheumatoid arthritis 85.3% and 27.3%, and psoriatic arthritis/axial spondyloarthritis 14.7% and 72.7%), respectively. During follow-up, 38 and 42 GIPs occurred in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab groups; incidence rates were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.8) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.5) per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Rates of GIP did not differ between the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab: wHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.9; P = 0.65). Despite the lack of power in some subgroup analyses, results were consistent whatever the subgroup of a type of JAKi received or subgroup with a type of rheumatic disease.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide cohort study, the rates of GIPs did not differ between groups of patients who received JAKi and adalimumab treatment. These results need to be confirmed in other observational studies.

Newer Immunosuppressants for Rheumatologic Disease: Preoperative Considerations

With the advent of small-molecule immune modulators, recombinant fusion proteins, and monoclonal antibodies, treatment options for patients with rheumatic diseases are now broad. These agents carry significant risks and an individualized approach to each patient, balancing known risks and benefits, remains the most prudent course. This review summarizes the available immunosuppressant treatments, discusses their perioperative implications, and provides recommendations for their perioperative management.

Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis from retroperitoneal panniculitis during the treatment with anti-IL-6 receptor antibody: A case report

A 53-year-old man with adult-onset Still's disease developed severe streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (SDSE), following retroperitoneal panniculitis. He was receiving tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor. The modifying effect of TCZ on the immune response and the pathophysiology of SDSE infection may have led to retroperitoneal panniculitis and atypical STSS with delayed shock and flare of soft tissue inflammation.

A multicentre, large-scale, observational study of tocilizumab in patients with giant cell arteritis in Japan

OBJECTIVES

In clinical trials, tocilizumab (TCZ) is efficacious in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). This study evaluated the real-world tolerability and effectiveness of TCZ in Japanese patients with GCA.

METHODS

In this multicentre, prospective, Phase 4, large-scale, observational study, patients with GCA (with no TCZ treatment 6 months before the study) were recruited from 71 centres across Japan. Patients received subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg weekly (observation period, 52 weeks).

RESULTS

Of the 117 patients [female, 70.1%; mean age, 74.2 years; mean disease duration, 1.4 years; treated for new-onset GCA, 71.8%; presence of large-vessel lesions (LVLs), 61.5%; previous immunosuppressant use, 28.2%; glucocorticoids at baseline, 95.7% (mean: 22.4 mg/day)], 38.5% reported adverse events. The most common adverse events of special interest were neutropaenia and leukopaenia (7.7%), followed by serious infection (6.0%). The relapse-free proportion was 85.0%; relapse after remission, 6.0%; and no remission, 9.0%. At the last observation, 94.2% of relapse-free patients received a concomitant glucocorticoid dose of <10 mg/day. Fatigue, headache, neck pain, and absence of LVLs were positively associated with the relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

TCZ was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with GCA and may be an effective treatment option combined with glucocorticoids.

A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.

Newer Immunosuppressants for Rheumatologic Disease: Preoperative Considerations

With the advent of small-molecule immune modulators, recombinant fusion proteins, and monoclonal antibodies, treatment options for patients with rheumatic diseases are now broad. These agents carry significant risks and an individualized approach to each patient, balancing known risks and benefits, remains the most prudent course. This review summarizes the available immunosuppressant treatments, discusses their perioperative implications, and provides recommendations for their perioperative management.

Six-month safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the real-world safety/effectiveness of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in patients with RA in Japan registered in a post-marketing surveillance study.

METHODS

This interim analysis included data from July 2013 to December 2018. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)/Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)/Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-4(ESR)] scores, and rates of SDAI/CDAI/DAS28-4(ESR)-defined remission and low disease activity were analysed using 6 months of data. Risk factors for serious infections were assessed by multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Safety and disease activity were evaluated in 6866 and 6649 patients, respectively. Overall, 32.73%/7.37% of patients reported AEs/SAEs. Clinically important AEs with tofacitinib included serious infections/infestations [3.13% of patients; incidence rate (IR; patients with events) 6.91/100 patient-years (PY)], herpes zoster (3.63%; IR 8.02/100 PY), and malignancies (0.68%; IR 1.45/100 PY). SDAI/CDAI/DAS28-4(ESR) scores and remission/low disease activity rates improved over 6 months. Male sex, older age, Steinbrocker's stage IV, history of infection, and diabetes mellitus at baseline were independent risk factors for serious infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with RA receiving tofacitinib in Japan, safety was consistent with the reported profile, and disease activity improved over 6 months.

STUDY IDENTIFIER

NCT01932372.

What can we learn from treatments of oral lichen planus?

Oral lichen planus (OLP), a T-lymphocyte-mediated disease of the oral mucosa, has a complex pathogenesis that involves a number of factors. The disease is characterized by recurrent episodes and requires continuous follow up, and there is no curative treatment available. Erosive lichen planus, among others, has a risk of malignant transformation and requires standardized treatment to control its progression. Different clinical subtypes of oral lichen planus require appropriate treatment. Pharmacological treatments are the most widely available and have the greatest variety of options and a number of novel pharmacological treatments are presented as highlights, including JAK enzyme inhibitors. The second is photodynamic therapy, which is the leading physiological treatment. In addition, periodontal treatment and psychological treatment should not be neglected. In this review, we briefly discuss the most recent developments in therapies for oral lichen planus after summarizing the most widely used clinical treatments, aiming to provide different proposals for future clinical treatment.

Successful treatment of refractory enteritis and arthritis with combination of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-6 inhibition in patients with ulcerative colitis

An 18 year-old man with autoimmune hepatitis-primary sclerosing cholangitis-overlap syndrome and ulcerative colitis was admitted due to relapsed enteritis and polyarthritis after cessation of infliximab. Colonoscopy and articular ultrasonography revealed large ulcers in the colon with crypt abscess in the specimens and active enthesitis and synovitis, respectively. His intestinitis was improved with golimumab but arthritis was persistent. Golimumab was switched to secukinumab, which was effective for arthritis. However, colitis was flared resulting in total colorectal resection. One month after colectomy, polyarthritis was relapsed. Tocilizumab ameliorated arthritis but enteritis emerged again, and switching tocilizumab to adalimumab improved enteritis but arthritis exacerbated. Finally, we restarted tocilizumab for arthritis with continued adalimumab for enteritis. The dual cytokine blocking strategy, tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 inhibition, subsided both of his refractory enteritis and arthritis and maintained remission for more than 3 years without any serious adverse event. Our case suggests that enteritis and arthritis in inflammatory bowel disease may be different in pathophysiology and raises the possible usefulness of simultaneous inhibition of two inflammatory cytokines in such cases.

Emerging Therapeutic Options for Refractory Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: The Evidence and Proposed Mechanisms of Action

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease with heterogenous clinical phenotypes characterized by non-necrotizing granuloma formation in affected organs. Most disease either remits spontaneously or responds to corticosteroids and second-line disease-modifying therapies. These medications are associated with numerous toxicities that can significantly impact patient quality-of-life and often limit their long-term use. Additionally, a minority of patients experience chronic, progressive disease that proves refractory to standard treatments. To date, there are limited data to guide the selection of alternative third-line medications for these patients. This review will outline the pathobiological rationale behind current and emerging therapeutic agents for refractory or drug-intolerant sarcoidosis and summarize the existing clinical evidence in support of their use.

Role of IL-6 and IL-6 targeted therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is one of the cytokines implicated in murine and human SLE. Only a few small studies have investigated IL-6 inhibition in human SLE. Currently, there are no studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov to assess the IL-6 targeted therapy in SLE, yet its role in the future remains to be defined. This narrative review analyses these and potential areas of future studies with IL-6 targeted therapy in SLE.

How to treat VEXAS syndrome: a systematic review on effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies for the vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome.

METHODS

A protocolized systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Three databases were searched for reports on treatment strategies for VEXAS. Data from the included publications was extracted and a narrative synthesis was performed. Treatment response was recorded as complete (CR), partial (PR) or none (NR) depending on changes in clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters. Patient characteristics, safety data and previous treatments were analysed.

RESULTS

We identified 36 publications with a total of 116 patients; 113 (98.3%) were male. The identified reports included azacytidine (CR 9/36, 25%; PR 14/36, 38.9%), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) (CR 11/33, 33%; PR 9/33, 27.3%), tocilizumab (CR 3/15, 20%; PR 6/15, 40%), allogeneic stem cell transplantation (CR 6/7, 85.7%; one patient died), anakinra (CR 4/5, 80%; NR 1/5, 20%), canakinumab (CR 1/2, 50%; PR 1/2, 50%) and glucocorticoid monotherapy (CR 1/6, 16.7%; PR 4/6, 66.7%). Individual reports were available for TNF inhibitors, rituximab and MTX. Data on adverse events were available for 67 patients (67/116, 57.8%) and included: pneumonia (12/67, 17.9%), other infections (9/67, 13.4%), venous thromboembolisms (6/67, 8.9%), cytopenias (4/67, 5.9%), and acute (4/67, 5.9%) and chronic graft-vs-host-disease (2/67, 2.9%).

CONCLUSION

Current data on VEXAS treatment are limited and inhomogeneous. Treatment decisions should be individualized. For the devolvement of treatment algorithms clinical trials are needed. Adverse events remain a challenge, especially an elevated risk for venous thromboembolism associated to JAKi treatment should be carefully considered.

A multicentre, large-scale, observational study of tocilizumab in patients with Takayasu arteritis in Japan: The ACTEMRA® (ACT)-Bridge study

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the real-world tolerability and effectiveness of tocilizumab in Japanese patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).

METHODS

Patients with TAK who had not received tocilizumab in the previous 6 months were enrolled in ACTEMRA® (ACT)-Bridge, a phase 4, observational study, from 66 Japanese institutions (enrolment period, September 2017 to September 2020) and received weekly subcutaneous tocilizumab 162 mg (observation period, 52 weeks).

RESULTS

Among 120 patients included (mean age, 38.4 years; mean disease duration, 7.7 years; treated for relapse, 50.8%; previous immunosuppressant use, 57.5%; glucocorticoid use at baseline, 97.5%), 49 (40.8%) reported adverse events. The most common adverse event of special interest was serious infection (7.5%). Relapse was observed in 24 (20.0%) patients (0.8%, 2.5%, and 16.7% reporting ≥3, 2, and 1 relapses, respectively). The reasons for diagnosing relapse included chest and back pain (45.8%), neck pain (25.0%), fatigue (16.7%), fever and headache (12.5% each), abnormal imaging findings (50.0%), and elevated inflammatory markers (16.7%). At the last observation, 83.0% of relapse-free patients recorded a concomitant glucocorticoid dose (prednisolone equivalent) <10 mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the effectiveness of tocilizumab in patients with TAK, with no new safety concerns. Tocilizumab plus glucocorticoids may be considered a treatment option for TAK.

Position statement on the management of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis via multidisciplinary modified Delphi consensus

INTRODUCTION

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy has shown increased overall survival in a wide range of cancer types with the associated risk of developing severe immune-mediated adverse events, commonly involving the gastrointestinal tract.

AIM

The aim of this position statement is to provide an updated practice advice to the gastroenterologists and oncologists on the diagnosis and management of ICI-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

METHODOLOGY

The evidence reviewed in this paper includes a comprehensive search strategy of English language publications. Consensus was reached using a three-round modified Delphi methodology and approved by the members of the Belgian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research and Development Group (BIRD), Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO), Belgian group of Digestive Oncology (BGDO), and Belgian Respiratory Society (BeRS).

CONCLUSIONS

The management of ICI-induced colitis requires an early multidisciplinary approach. A broad initial assessment is necessary (clinical presentation, laboratory markers, endoscopic and histologic examination) to confirm the diagnosis. Criteria for hospitalisation, management of ICIs, and initial endoscopic assessment are proposed. Even if corticosteroids are still considered the first-line therapy, biologics are recommended as an escalation therapy and as early treatment in patients with high-risk endoscopic findings.

Tocilizumab-induced mucosal injury in the terminal ileum mimicking intestinal Behçet's disease: A case report

RATIONALE

Tocilizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor monoclonal antibody, is used for the treatment of adult-onset Still disease (AOSD). Despite its efficacy in many clinical situations, concerns have been raised regarding intestinal mucosal injury in patients receiving tocilizumab.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 64-year-old woman with a history of AOSD was admitted to our hospital with hematochezia. She had AOSD for 15 years and underwent treatment with biweekly tocilizumab 9 months prior to admission. Colonoscopy revealed a large punched-out ulcer in the terminal ileum. On pathological evaluation, nonspecific enteritis with lymphocytes and eosinophils were seen. Based on the location and shape of the lesion, we suspected intestinal Behçet's disease. However, the ulcer reduced in size over time by discontinuation of tocilizumab without additional drug treatment, indicating that it was a drug-induced ulcer.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with tocilizumab-induced small intestinal ulcer.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient treated with the discontinuation of tocilizumab.

OUTCOMES

The discontinuation of tocilizumab resulted in ulcer scarring. There was no recurrence of hematochezia.

LESSONS

Tocilizumab can cause deep ulcerative lesions in the terminal ileum, which may resemble intestinal Behçet's disease. It is important to continuously monitor abdominal symptoms during tocilizumab therapy and aggressively perform colonoscopy when hematochezia or abdominal pain is observed.

Impact of upadacitinib on the risk of digestive events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is an effective treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but its use has been associated with an increased risk of digestive events. This systematic review aimed to investigate the risk of digestive events in RA patients treated with UPA.

Methods

Systematic searches of electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) from inception to September 2022 were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared UPA with control treatment and reported digestive events in RA patients. We pooled data using the random-effects model and meta-analysis was conducted by Stata software.

Results

Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed, with a total of 6103 patients. Compared with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), pooled analysis of 8 trials revealed no statistical difference in hepatic disorder (HD) risk and gastrointestinal (GI) perforation (GIP) risk ((OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.56, I² = 0.00%); OR = 4.49, 95% CI 0.56 to 35.93, I² = 0.00%)). When we considered the influence of UPA on the grade of liver enzymes, the data indicated that grade 3 and 4 elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were infrequent. Additionally, a dose-dependent impact of UPA on the risks of HD was not observed. The results suggested no interaction by dose of drug, or indication for treatment of GIP risk.

Conclusion

Our results showed that RA patients receiving UPA compared with csDMARDs had no significant increased risk associated with digestive events. Further long-term research of emerging data is urgently needed to gain a better understanding of the association between UPA and digestive events in the RA population.

English version of Japanese guidance for the use of oral Janus kinase inhibitors ( JAK1 and TYK2 inhibitors) in the treatments of psoriasis

This is the English version of Japanese guidance for the use of oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAK1 and tyrosine kinase 2 [TYK2] inhibitors) in the treatments of psoriasis. Several cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-7, IL-12, IL-21, IL-22, IL-23, interferon (IFN)-α, and IFN-γ, are involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis (including psoriatic arthritis). As oral JAK inhibitors hinder the JAK-signal transducers and activators of transcription signal transduction routes involved in the signal transduction of these cytokines, they may be effective for the treatment of psoriasis. JAK has four types: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2. Regarding the use of oral JAK inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis in Japan, indications of the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib were extended also to psoriatic arthritis in 2021, and the use of the TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib for plaque-type psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, and erythrodermic psoriasis became covered by health insurance in 2022. This guidance was developed for board-certified dermatologists who specialize in the treatment of psoriasis and to promote the proper use of oral JAK inhibitors. In the package inserts and guides for appropriate use, upadacitinib and deucravacitinib are classified as a "JAK inhibitor" and a "TYK2 inhibitor", respectively, and it is possible that there may be differences in safety between the two drugs. The safety of these drugs will be evaluated for the future by the postmarketing surveillance for molecularly targeted drugs for psoriasis of the Japanese Dermatological Association.

Baricitinib Safety for Events of Special Interest in Populations at Risk: Analysis from Randomised Trial Data Across Rheumatologic and Dermatologic Indications

INTRODUCTION

Baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, is an approved treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atopic dermatitis (AD), and alopecia areata (AA). Further characterisation of adverse events of special interest (AESI) for JAK inhibitors in at-risk populations will improve benefit-risk assessment for individual patients and diseases.

METHODS

Data were pooled from clinical trials and long-term extensions in moderate-to-severe active RA, moderate-to-severe AD, and severe AA. Incidence rates (IR) per 100 patient-years of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), malignancy, venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious infection, and mortality were calculated for patients with low risk (younger than 65 years with no specified risk factors), and patients at risk (≥ 1 of: aged 65 years or older, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, current smoking, HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, poor mobility on EQ-5D, or history of malignancy).

RESULTS

Datasets included baricitinib exposure up to 9.3 years with 14,744 person-years of exposure (PYE) (RA), 3.9 years with 4628 PYE (AD), and 3.1 years with 1868 PYE (AA). In patients with low risk (RA: 31%, AD: 48%, AA: 49%), IRs for MACE (0.05, 0.04, 0), malignancies (0.20, 0.13, 0), VTE (0.09, 0.04, 0), serious infection (1.73, 1.18, 0.6), and mortality (0.04, 0, 0) in the RA, AD, and AA datasets, respectively, were low. In patients at risk (RA: 69%, AD: 52%, AA: 51%), IRs were for MACE (0.70, 0.25, 0.10), malignancies (1.23, 0.45, 0.31), VTE (0.66, 0.12, 0.10), serious infection (2.95, 2.30, 1.05), and mortality (0.78, 0.16, 0) for RA, AD, and AA datasets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Populations with low risk have low incidence of the examined JAK inhibitor-related AESI. In the dermatologic indications, incidence is also low for patients at risk. Considering individual disease burden, risk factors, and response to treatment is relevant to make informed decisions for individual patients treated with baricitinib.

The Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Miscellaneous Inflammatory Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract

The novel coronavirus pandemic of COVID-19 has emerged as a highly significant recent threat to global health with about 600,000,000 known infections and more than 6,450,000 deaths worldwide since its emergence in late 2019. COVID-19 symptoms are predominantly respiratory, with mortality largely related to pulmonary manifestations, but the virus also potentially infects all parts of the gastrointestinal tract with related symptoms and manifestations that affect patient treatment and outcome. COVID-19 can directly infect the gastrointestinal tract because of the presence of widespread angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors in the stomach and small intestine that can cause local COVID-19 infection and associated inflammation. This work reviews the pathopysiology, clinical manifestations, workup, and treatment of miscellaneous inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract other than inflammatory bowel disease.

English version of Japanese guidance for the use of oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatments of atopic dermatitis

This is the English version of guidance for the use of oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Several cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and interferon-γ, are involved in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. As oral JAK inhibitors hinder the JAK-signal transducers and activators of transcription signal transduction routes involved in the signal transduction of these cytokines, they may be effective for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. In Japan, as oral JAK inhibitors for atopic dermatitis, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, baricitinib, expanded its authorized indications for atopic dermatitis in 2020. Consequentially, a JAK1 inhibitor, upadacitinib, also expanded its indications to atopic dermatitis in 2021, followed by new approval of another JAK1 inhibitor, abrocitinib, for the use under the Japanese health insurance system. Physicians who intend to use them should sufficiently understand and comply with contents of guidelines prepared by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare to promote optimal use of these drugs. In the treatment with oral JAK inhibitors, it is important to sufficiently consider disease factors, treatment factors and patient backgrounds, and share them with patients to choose treatment options. Points to be considered for drug selection include the efficacy and safety of drugs, age of patients, and dosage and administration of the drug. This guidance was developed for board certified dermatologists, who are specialized in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, and for promoting proper use of oral JAK inhibitors, taking into account a variety of factors in individual patients.

The current landscape of CAR T-cell therapy for solid tumors: Mechanisms, research progress, challenges, and counterstrategies

The successful outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in treating hematologic cancers have increased the previously unprecedented excitement to use this innovative approach in treating various forms of human cancers. Although researchers have put a lot of work into maximizing the effectiveness of these cells in the context of solid tumors, few studies have discussed challenges and potential strategies to overcome them. Restricted trafficking and infiltration into the tumor site, hypoxic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), antigen escape and heterogeneity, CAR T-cell exhaustion, and severe life-threatening toxicities are a few of the major obstacles facing CAR T-cells. CAR designs will need to go beyond the traditional architectures in order to get over these limitations and broaden their applicability to a larger range of malignancies. To enhance the safety, effectiveness, and applicability of this treatment modality, researchers are addressing the present challenges with a wide variety of engineering strategies as well as integrating several therapeutic tactics. In this study, we reviewed the antigens that CAR T-cells have been clinically trained to recognize, as well as counterstrategies to overcome the limitations of CAR T-cell therapy, such as recent advances in CAR T-cell engineering and the use of several therapies in combination to optimize their clinical efficacy in solid tumors.

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update

OBJECTIVES

To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.

METHODS

An international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3-6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.

The impact of tocilizumab treatment for cytokine release syndrome on the incidence of early blood stream infections after peripheral blood haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a potentially fatal systemic inflammatory response that can occur in patients undergoing peripheral blood haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT). Severe CRS has previously been associated with increased infection risk. IL-6 inhibitors, such as tocilizumab, are useful in moderate to severe CRS, but their effect on infection risk has not been established in this setting. We examined the effect of tocilizumab on blood stream infections (BSIs) in the early post-transplant period in 235 patients who underwent haplo-HCT from 2013 to 2020. Mild CRS was associated with a lower incidence of BSI than severe CRS (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.74). In the tocilizumab group, 31% of patients had positive blood cultures versus 14% in the non-tocilizumab group (OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.30-8.60, p = 0.58). However, when controlling for CRS grade, tocilizumab was not independently associated with increased rates of BSIs, suggesting it does not further increase infection risk.

The prospects of interleukin-6 inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis: Olokizumab (novel monoclonal antibodies to IL-6)

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs) manifested with progressive destruction of joints, systemic inflammation of visceral organs and a wide range of co-morbidities associated with chronic inflammation. Among the cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of RA and certain other IMRDs, the role of interleukin (IL) 6 is of special interest. The introduction of mAbs tocilizumab (TCZ) and later sarilumab (SAR), both blocking the receptor of this cytokine, into clinical practice was an important achievement in the treatment of IIRDs at the beginning of the 21st century. As a novel approach in the treatment of RA, the humanized mAb against IL-6 olokizumab (OKZ) is in development by the Russian company R-PHARM under the license agreement with UCB Pharma. The review examines new data on efficacy and safety of OKZ in RA and the prospects of its use in rheumatology

Rivaroxaban Treatment for Patients With Unprovoked or Provoked Venous Thromboembolism - Subanalysis of the J'xactly Study

Background: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain unclear. Methods and Results: In this subanalysis of the J'xactly study, a multicenter prospective observational study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE according to unprovoked (n=388) or provoked (n=557) VTE status. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Compared with patients in the provoked group, patients in the unprovoked group were younger, less likely to be female, and had higher body weight. The incidence of symptomatic VTE recurrence was significantly higher in the unprovoked than provoked VTE group (3.54% vs. 1.77% per patient-year; P=0.032). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding events between rivaroxaban-treated patients with unprovoked and provoked VTE (2.31% vs. 3.75% per patient-year; P=0.289). Although the proportion of patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 who were non-users of antiplatelet agents was higher in the unprovoked VTE group, there was no interaction effect (BMI: 4.58% vs. 1.55% per patient-year [P=0.040; P for interaction=0.361]; concomitant antiplatelet agent non-users: 3.65% vs. 1.72% per patient-year [P=0.028; P for interaction=0.627]). Conclusions: This subanalysis suggests the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with unprovoked VTE. In such patients, DOAC discontinuation should be considered carefully, particularly in those not using antiplatelet agents and those with a high BMI.

COVID-19 infection and large intestinal perforation: A case series

Introduction

COVID-19 is a viral illness characterized primarily by respiratory symptoms. However, patients with COVID-19 infection may also present with gastrointestinal symptoms. Subsequent complications can be associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study of three COVID-19 positive patients who developed large intestinal perforations and an analysis of their clinical characteristics, diagnosis, surgical treatment and outcomes. Three patients aged 45, 51 and 82 years old presented to our institution between November 2021 and March 2022 and were diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). All three patients received steroids and underwent surgery during their admission. None of our patients had prior history of bowel perforation or risks factors justifying their presentation.

Presentation of cases

Our first patient was found to have an ascending colon perforation and underwent right colon resection and end ileostomy. Our second patient was found to have a cecal perforation and underwent ileocecectomy with end ileostomy and mucus fistula creation. Our third patient was found to have a large cecal perforation and underwent right hemicolectomy and was left in discontinuity during the index operation.

Discussion

GI perforation is a less common but serious extra-pulmonary complication of COVID-19. The cases in the present study involve ascending colon perforations in the setting of active COVID-19 infection that occurred within two to five weeks after initial COVID-19 diagnosis. Given viral replication in GI cells, the local inflammatory effect of viral infection in the GI may play a role in bowel perforation. Providers should additionally be aware of the risk of perforation with steroids and immunomodulators. Immunosuppressive effects of these therapies may mask the classical signs of abdominal sepsis and lead to possible missed diagnoses.

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal perforation is a rare but serious complication of COVID-19 infection. A high degree of clinical suspicion is necessary for timely diagnosis and management.

•

Gastrointestinal perforation is a rare but serious complication of COVID-19 infection

•

In this case series, ascending colon perforation occurs in each case within two to five weeks of initial COVID-19 diagnosis

•

Steroids and immunomodulators pose additional risk of perforation and may mask the classical signs of abdominal sepsis

A systematic literature review informing the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment with interleukin-6 pathway inhibition with biological DMARDs in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

Objectives

Informing an international task force updating the consensus statement on efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) selectively targeting interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway in the context of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Methods

A systematic literature research of all publications on IL-6 axis inhibition with bDMARDs published between January 2012 and December 2020 was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in clinical trials including their long-term extensions and observational studies. Meeting abstracts from ACR, EULAR conferences and results on clinicaltrials.gov were taken into consideration.

Results

187 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Evidence for positive effect of IL-6 inhibition was available in various inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still’s disease, cytokine release syndrome due to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Newcomers like satralizumab and anti-IL-6 ligand antibody siltuximab have expanded therapeutic approaches for Castleman’s disease and neuromyelitis optica, respectively. IL-6 inhibition did not provide therapeutic benefits in psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and certain connective tissue diseases. In COVID-19, tocilizumab (TCZ) has proven to be therapeutic in advanced disease. Safety outcomes did not differ from other bDMARDs, except higher risks of diverticulitis and lower gastrointestinal perforations. Inconsistent results were observed in several studies investigating the risk for infections when comparing TCZ to TNF-inhibitors.

Conclusion

IL-6 inhibition is effective for treatment of several inflammatory diseases with a safety profile that is widely comparable to other bDMARDs.

Inflammatory Diseases of the Aorta: JACC Focus Seminar, Part 2

Inflammatory aortitis is most often caused by large vessel vasculitis (LVV), including giant cell arteritis, Takayasu's arteritis, immunoglobulin G4-related aortitis, and isolated aortitis. There are distinct differences in the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and natural history of LVV that are important for the cardiovascular provider to know. If possible, histopathologic specimens should be obtained to aide in accurate diagnosis and management of LVV. In most cases, corticosteroids are utilized in the acute phase, with the addition of steroid-sparing agents to achieve disease remission while sparing corticosteroid toxic effects. Endovascular and surgical procedures have been described with success but should be delayed until disease control is achieved whenever possible. Long-term management should include regular follow-up with rheumatology and surveillance imaging for sequelae of LVV.

Consensus statement on blocking interleukin-6 receptor and interleukin-6 in inflammatory conditions: an update

BACKGROUND

Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6Rα antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway.

METHODS

A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document.

RESULTS

The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers.

Biologic Therapy for Refractory Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are treatments for several cancer types. Pathogenesis of ICI-induced colitis is not yet clearly explained as it can be disguised as another form such as inflammatory bowel disease or IBD. Recent studies revealed that ICI-induced colitis is a unique form of colitis wherein the synergy of regulatory T cells with the gut microbiome is involved. Diagnosis of colitis can be done via endoscopic lesions and histopathological methods. A patient with colitis can be compared with someone who has IBD. Initial treatment is a corticosteroid. Cooperation between gastroenterologists and oncologists is required to understand further the complete diagnosis and management of different behaviors of ICI-induced colitis. Although immunotherapy provides breakthroughs in treating cancer, adverse effects cannot be prevented and have to be carefully addressed. This study aimed to discuss different biologic therapeutic perspectives in treating refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis. This review provided guidelines, challenges, and suggested protocols for drug immunosuppression.

Computation-Based Discovery of Potential Targets for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Related Molecular Screening and Mechanism Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine

This study is aimed at screening potential therapeutic ingredients in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and identifying the key rheumatoid arthritis (RA) targets using computational simulations. Data for TCM-active ingredients with clear pharmacological effects were collected. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity were evaluated. Potential RA targets were identified using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, protein–protein interaction network, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses and potential TCM ingredients using AutoDock Vina. To examine the mechanisms underlying small molecules, target prediction, Gene Ontology, KEGG, and network modeling analyses were conducted; the effects were verified in rat synovial cells using cell proliferation assay. The activities of tumor necrosis factor TNF-α and IL-1β and alterations in cellular target protein levels were detected by ELISA and Western blotting, respectively. In total, data for 432 TCM active ingredients with clear pharmacological effects were obtained. Five critical RA-related genes were identified; CCL5 and CXCL10 were selected for molecular docking. Target prediction and network-based proximity analysis showed that dioscin could modulate 22 known RA clinical targets. Dioscin, asiaticoside, and ginsenoside Re could effectively inhibit in vitro cell proliferation and secretion of TNF-α and IL-1β in RA rat synovial cells. Using bioinformatics and computer-aided drug design, the potential small anti-RA molecules and their mechanisms of action were comprehensively identified. Dioscin could significantly inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in RA rat synovial cells by reducing TNF-α and IL-1β secretion and inhibiting abnormal CCL5, CXCL10, CXCR2, and IL2 expression.

Monitoring and Management of the Patient with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Inflammatory Arthritis: Current Perspectives

In this review, we draw from observational studies, treatment guidelines and our own clinical experience to describe approaches to monitoring and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced inflammatory arthritis, including polymyalgia rheumatica. This condition occurs in about 4% of ICI-treated cancer patients and can persist for a year or longer. Mild arthritis can generally be managed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intraarticular steroids injections and/or low dose corticosteroids. Higher grade arthritis should be brought under control with corticosteroids, but early introduction of a steroid-sparing agent is recommended to minimize steroid toxicity. In order to assess the effectiveness of any arthritis treatment, tender and swollen joint counts and patient reported measures of physical function, such as the health assessment questionnaire, should be obtained at each visit. Referral to a rheumatologist is recommended for patients with high grade arthritis to help guide the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

[Celebrating 33 years of the DRFZ: Epidemiology and Health Services Research]

Der wissenschaftliche Fokus des Programmbereichs Epidemiologie und Versorgungsforschung des DRFZ liegt einerseits auf der Erforschung der Versorgungssituation rheumakranker Menschen in Deutschland einschließlich ihrer Defizite, Fortschritte und zeitlichen Trends. Andererseits ist ein wesentliches Ziel, durch die langfristige Beobachtung von Krankheitsverläufen in großen Kohorten Risikofaktoren für ungünstige Krankheitsverläufe, aber auch protektive Faktoren aufzudecken. Mit der Zulassung innovativer, zielgerichteter Therapien zu Beginn dieses Jahrtausends wurde die Thematik der Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit der verschiedenen antirheumatischen Therapien unter Alltagsbedingungen zu einer für Ärzte und Patienten vorrangigen Frage. Die Biologika-Register entwickelten sich zu zentralen Instrumenten des Programmbereichs, mit denen Fragen zur vergleichenden Therapiesicherheit, aber auch zur Therapiewirksamkeit und Reduktion von Risiken durch wirksame Therapie, belastbar beantwortet werden können.

Im vorliegenden Artikel werden ausgewählte Ergebnisse epidemiologischer Forschung am DRFZ dargestellt. Das übergreifende Ziel der Forschung war und ist es, zur Verbesserung der Lebensqualität rheumakranker Kinder und Erwachsener beizutragen. Dem dient die klinisch-evaluative Versorgungsforschung ebenso wie die Gewinnung von Erkenntnissen, die eine wirksame, individualisierte Therapie unterstützen. Als unverzichtbare Instrumente haben sich große, langfristige Patientenkohorten und ein stabiles Netzwerk mit den klinisch tätigen Rheumatologen und Betroffenen erwiesen.

A Rare Case of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Tocilizumab-induced Intestinal Mucosal Injury

Intestinal mucosal injury that develops as a complication of tocilizumab (TCZ) is usually associated with diverticulosis. We herein report a rare case of TCZ-induced intestinal mucosal injury in the absence of diverticulosis. A 74-year-old woman suffering from rheumatoid arthritis started taking TCZ. Six months later, she complained of hematochezia and abdominal pain. Colonoscopy revealed multiple ulcers spreading from the cecum to the transverse colon but no diverticulosis. These lesions were cured at three months after the discontinuation of TCZ. We should consider TCZ as a risk factor for intestinal mucosal injury, even if patients have no history of intestinal disease associated with diverticulosis.

Safety of baricitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a median of 4.6 and up to 9.3 years of treatment: final results from long-term extension study and integrated database

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term safety from the completed extension trial of baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Treatment-emergent adverse events are summarised from an integrated database (9 phase III/II/Ib and 1 long-term extension) of patients who received any baricitinib dose (All-bari-RA). Standardised incidence ratio (SIR) for malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)) and standardised mortality ratio (SMR) were estimated. Additional analysis was done in a subset of patients who had ever taken 2 mg or 4 mg baricitinib.

RESULTS

3770 patients received baricitinib (14 744 patient-years of exposure (PYE)). All-bari-RA incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years at risk were 2.6, 3.0 and 0.5 for serious infections, herpes zoster and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), respectively. In patients aged ≥50 with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, the IR for MACE was 0.77 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.04). The IR for malignancy (excluding NMSC) during the first 48 weeks was 0.6 and remained stable thereafter (IR 1.0). The SIR for malignancies excluding NMSC was 1.07 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.26) and the SMR was 0.74 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.92). All-bari-RA IRs for deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE), DVT and PE were 0.5 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.61), 0.4 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.45) and 0.3 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.35), respectively. No clear dose differences were noted for exposure-adjusted IRs (per 100 PYE) for deaths, serious infections, DVT/PE and MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this integrated analysis including long-term data of baricitinib from 3770 patients (median 4.6 years, up to 9.3 years) with active RA, baricitinib maintained a similar safety profile to earlier analyses. No new safety signals were identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01185353, NCT00902486, NCT01469013, NCT01710358, NCT02265705, NCT01721044, NCT01721057, NCT01711359 and NCT01885078.

Changes in Colonic Inflammation Related with Takayasu Arteritis during a 10-year Observation Period

Takayasu arteritis (TA) sometimes presents with colitis, which may be diagnosed as inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBDU) because of atypical or mixed findings of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease. We herein report an 18-year-old girl presenting with colitis with an occasional high fever eventually diagnosed as TA with IBDU. Colonic inflammation was initially discontinuous and stronger in the proximal colon, atypical of UC. However, over 10-year observation, the distribution of colonic inflammation varied and became UC-like. Variations in TA-related colonic inflammations over time have been unclear. Our long-term observation might help clarify the details of TA-related colonic inflammation.