Back pain in psoriatic arthritis: defining prevalence, characteristics and performance of inflammatory back pain criteria in psoriatic arthritis

Evaluation of the Possibility of Axial Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Meeting Classification Criteria for Axial Spondyloarthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis

The objective of the study was to analyze whether axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA) patients meet classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A total of 104 patients (66 men and 38 women) with PsA according to CASPAR criteria were examined, all patients had back pain. Patients were evaluated for presence of inflammatory back pain (IBP) by ASAS criteria. Back pain not meeting the ASAS criteria was taken to be chronic back pain (chrBP). Patients underwent hands, feet and pelvis, cervical spine and lumbar spine X-rays. Erosions, osteolysis, and juxta-articular new bone formation were evaluated. Definite radiographic sacroiliitis (d-rSI) was defined as bilateral grade ≥ 2 or unilateral grade ≥ 3. Nineteen patients without d-rSI underwent sacroiliac joints MRI. Ninety-three patients underwent HLA B27 examination. The number of patients who met the criteria for axSpA (ASAS) and the modified New York (mNY) criteria for AS was determined. IBP was identified in 67 (64.4%) patients; chrBP, in 37 (35.6%) patients; 31 (29.8%) patient were of older age (over 40) at the onset of IBP/chrBP; 57 (58.8%) patients had d-rSI; 6 (31.6%) patients had MRI-SI; syndesmophytes were detected in 57 (58.8%) cases. Among 40 patients without d-rSI, 19 (47.5%) had syndesmophytes. In 38/97 (39.2%) patients d-rSI was detected along with syndesmophytes, while 19/97 (19.6%) patients had isolated d-rSI without spondylitis, and 19/97 (19.6%) patients had isolated syndesmophytes without d-rSI. HLA B27 was present in 28 (30.1%) cases. 51 (55.4%) patients met criteria for axSpA. Forty-one (44.6%) patients did not meet criteria for axSpA; however, 27 (65.9%) of them had syndesmophytes. Forty-eight (48.5%) PsA patients met mNY criteria for AS. Among these patients, a set of specific features was revealed: 18 (37.5%) had no IBP, 18 (37.5%) were of older age (over 40) at the onset of IBP/chrBP, 34 (70.8%) had dactylitis, 38 (79.2%) had erosive polyarthritis, 23 (48.8%) had juxta-articular new bone formation, 14 (30.2%) had osteolysis, 23 (48.9%) had "chunky" non-marginal syndesmophytes, and 40 (82.6%) had nail psoriasis; 28 (66.6%) patients were HLA-B27 negative. Forty-five percent of axPsA patients do not meet criteria for axSpA. Characteristic features have been identified to differentiate axPsA from AS.

Inflammatory Back Pain and Psoriasis: Expecting Spondyloarthritis, Discovering Lymphoma

Inflammatory back pain is a characteristic of spondyloarthritis. It is not, however, an exclusive symptom of inflammatory rheumatic diseases as it can also be associated with non-inflammatory entities. Infrequently, the etiology can be found in neoplastic conditions such as malignant lymphoma. Even in the presence of comorbidities indicatory of underlying rheumatic disease, like psoriasis vulgaris, the clinician should not be led astray. It is essential to pay attention to contradictory findings, as treatment crucially differs depending on diagnosis. Herein, we report on a psoriasis patient who presented with characteristic inflammatory back pain and deceptive imaging results. While the patient was initially thought to suffer from an inflammatory rheumatic disease with axial involvement, it was the accompanying atypical circumstances, particularly her age, that instantly challenged the diagnosis of axial psoriatic arthritis. She was eventually diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma that manifested with rare and exclusively extranodal lesions and spondyloarthritis-like morphology. This case effectively demonstrates the importance of a thorough diagnostic workup and how certain clinical factors, such as the patient's age, should be considered when confronted with inflammatory back pain.

Characteristics of patients with psoriatic arthritis in Korea: focusing on axial involvement

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Korean patients focusing on PsA with axial involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective medical chart review was performed to identify PsA patients at a single tertiary center. Cases of AS patients with psoriasis were recruited from a prospective AS registry of the same center. Demographics, laboratory findings, and radiologic characteristics were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 69 PsA patients were identified. In PsA patients, spondylitis (46.4%) was the most common form. Compared to AS patients with psoriasis, PsA patients with radiographic axial involvement were older (50.9 vs. 32.4 years; p < 0.001) and showed greater peripheral disease activity (peripheral arthritis 78.1 vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001; enthesitis 50.0 vs. 6.3%, p = 0.003). AS patients with psoriasis presented a higher rate of HLA-B*27 positivity (81.3 vs. 17.2%; p < 0.001) and a more frequent history of inflammatory back pain (100.0 vs. 75.0%; p = 0.039) than PsA patients with radiographic axial involvement. Significant proportions of PsA patients with radiographic axial involvement had cervical spine involvement (10/18, 55.6%) and spondylitis without sacroiliitis (10/23, 43.5%).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that axial involvement is common in Korean PsA patients, and its characteristics can be distinct from those of AS.

Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Cross-sectional Clinical and Radiologic Studies

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate spinal involvement in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients using clinical and radiographic methods.

METHODS

A cross-sectional clinical study was conducted on 50 PsA patients diagnosed according to the CASPAR criteria. Clinical examinations and functional assessments were performed. A radiographic assessment of the spine was performed.

RESULTS

Out of 50 PsA patients (mean age of 45.50 ± 9.90 years), (males and females constituted 27 (54.0%) and 23 (46.0%) respectively), 76% had radiological axial involvement; (26%) with inflammatory axial pain and (50%) without inflammatory axial pain (subclinical). Three axial radiographic patterns were detected including spondylitis without sacroiliitis (15.78%), spondylitis with sacroiliitis (78.94%), and sacroiliitis without spondylitis (5.26%). In axial PsA patients, males were more affected than females (χ2=11.679, p = 0.003), with older age (H = 15.817, p < 0.001) and higher body mass index (BMI) (F = 5.145, p = 0.010), increased psoriasis duration (H = 9.826, p = 0.007) and severity (Η=25.171, p < 0.001), and more spinal movement limitations than PsA patients without axial involvement (F = 26.568, p < 0.001). Cervical involvement was higher than lumbar involvement. Axial radiographic severity assessed by the PsA Spondylitis Radiology Index was associated with increased disability as assessed by the Health assessment questionnaire (rs = 0.533, p = 0.001) and decreased quality of life assessed by short form-36 score (rs = -0.321, p = 0.050).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that a high percentage of PsA patients had axial involvement with a high percentage of them having asymptomatic radiological findings. The cervical spine is more frequently and severely affected than the lumbar spine. Axial PsA occurs in males more than females with characteristic older age and higher BMI, increased psoriasis duration, and more limitation of spinal mobility.

The effect of ixekizumab on axial manifestations in patients with psoriatic arthritis from two phase III clinical trials: SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition predominantly affecting the peripheral joints. However, some patients with PsA can experience axial involvement which is manifested with back pain and associated with increased burden of illness.

Objectives

The aim of this post hoc analysis was to determine the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE) up to 52 weeks in reducing axial symptoms in PsA patients, presenting with axial manifestations.

Design

This was a post hoc analysis of two pooled phase III clinical trials.

Methods

Patients with axial manifestations, from two placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, phase III trials (SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2), were defined as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 (Q2; back pain)] total score ⩾4 and average of BASDAI Q5 + Q6 (morning stiffness) ⩾4 at baseline. For this post hoc analysis, the efficacy of IXE was evaluated at weeks 16, 24, and 52 using separate BASDAI questions (including back pain and morning stiffness), total BASDAI and modified BASDAI (mBASDAI; without Q3), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), and 50% improvement in BASDAI (BASDAI50) response. Treatment comparisons were performed using logistic regression and analysis of covariance model for categorical and continuous end points, respectively.

Results

In the post hoc analysis among PsA patients with axial manifestations at baseline (N = 313), improvements in back pain and morning stiffness at weeks 16 and 24 were significantly greater in patients receiving IXE versus placebo (both p < 0.001). Improvements in BASDAI individual scores and total scores, mBASDAI, and ASDAS were significantly greater in patients receiving IXE compared with placebo. Similarly, significantly more IXE-treated patients achieved BASDAI50 at weeks 16 and 24 versus placebo. The effect of IXE was sustained at week 52. Similar effects were observed in sensitivity analyses subgroups.

Conclusion

IXE is effective in improving axial symptoms in patients with active PsA presenting with axial manifestations.

Extent of axial damage in psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: comparative data from the BEPAS and (Be-)GIANT multicentre cohorts

BACKGROUND

To examine radiographic axial damage of the sacroiliac joints and spine in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) in private and academic Belgian practices.

METHODS

Patients with PsA with clinical diagnosis of PsA and fulfilling the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis from the prospective Belgian Epidemiological Psoriatic Arthritis Study and patients with SpA fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for SpA originate from the Ghent and BelGian Inflammatory Arthritis and spoNdylitis cohorTs were included in this study. Baseline pelvic and spinal radiographs were analysed by two calibrated readers. Blinded for the origin of the cohort or clinical data readers assessed the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) and modified New York criteria on spinal and pelvic radiographs, respectively. Data were compared between both patient groups.

RESULTS

Of the 525 patients included (312 PsA and 213 SpA), most patients showed normal spinal radiographs: 87.5% of the patients with PsA and 92.0% of the patients with SpA. Patients with SpA with spinal damage show higher mSASSS than the patients with PsA (p<0.05). In patients with PsA, cervical spine is more often affected; 24/33 patients (72.7%) compared with lumbar spine 11/33 (33.3%). While in patients with SpA, syndesmophyte location was more evenly distributed; cervical 9/14 (64.3%) and lumbar 10/14 (71.4%).

CONCLUSION

Minimal radiographic spinal damage was observed in Belgian patients with PsA or SpA. Patients with SpA tend to have higher mSASSS values and more syndesmophytes compared with PsA. Syndesmophytes were more often located in the cervical spine of patients with PsA, while the location was equally distributed in axSpA.

MRI Findings in Axial Psoriatic Spondylarthritis

Psoriatic arthritis is a significant medical condition with a high prevalence, a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, and a high degree of overlap with other spondylarthritis disorders, particularly ankylosing spondylitis. Hence, knowledge of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations and a multidisciplinary strategy are required for the better management of these patients. We searched publications from the last 10 years and focused on the most relevant ones which discussed the classification criteria, the MRI characteristics of axial psoriatic arthritis, the importance of MRI for follow up, and the reliability of skin and synovial biopsy. Axial spondylarthritis can be diagnosed and followed up on using the well-established MRI technique and, additionally, a biopsy. The analysis and concordance between them can provide new directions for future studies.

Comparison of patients with axial PsA and patients with axSpA and concomitant psoriasis: an analysis of the German register RABBIT-SpA

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) show certain overlaps: A subset of patients with PsA can develop axial involvement (axial PsA, axPsA), while a subset of patients with axSpA presents with psoriasis (axSpA+pso). Treatment strategy for axPsA is mostly based on axSpA evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To compare demographic and disease-specific parameters of axPsA and axSpA+pso.

METHODS

RABBIT-SpA is a prospective longitudinal cohort study. AxPsA was defined based on (1) clinical judgement by rheumatologists; (2) imaging (sacroiliitis according to modified New York criteria in radiographs or signs of active inflammation in MRI or syndesmophytes/ankylosis in radiographs or signs of active inflammation in spine MRI). axSpA was stratified into axSpA+pso and axSpA without pso.

RESULTS

Psoriasis was documented in 181/1428 axSpA patients (13%). Of 1395 PsA patients, 359 (26%) showed axial involvement. 297 patients (21%) fulfilled the clinical definition and 196 (14%) the imaging definition of axial manifestation of PsA. AxSpA+pso differed from axPsA regardless whether clinical or imaging definition was used. axPsA patients were older, more often female and less often HLA-B27+. Peripheral manifestations were more often present in axPsA than in axSpA+pso, whereas uveitis and inflammatory bowel disease were more common in axSpA+pso. Burden of disease (patient global, pain, physician global) was similar among axPsA and axSpA+pso patients.

CONCLUSIONS

AxPsA differs from axSpA+pso in its clinical manifestations, irrespective of whether axPsA is defined clinically or by imaging. These findings support the hypothesis that axSpA and PsA with axial involvement are distinct entities, so extrapolation of treatment data from randomised controlled trials in axSpA should be performed with caution.

Impact of key manifestations of psoriatic arthritis on patient quality of life, functional status, and work productivity: Findings from a real-world study in the United States and Europe

OBJECTIVES

To determine the individual impact of key manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on quality of life (QoL), physical function, and work disability.

METHODS

Data from the Adelphi 2018 PsA Disease-Specific Programme, a multinational, cross-sectional study of PsA patients, were used. PsA manifestations included peripheral arthritis (number of joints affected), psoriasis (body surface area [BSA]), axial involvement (inflammatory back pain [IBP] and sacroiliitis) enthesitis, and dactylitis. General, and disease-specific QoL, physical function, and work disability were measured with EQ-5D-5L, PsAID-12, HAQ-DI, and WPAI, respectively. Multivariate regression adjusting for potential confounders evaluated the independent effect of PsA manifestations on each outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 2222 PsA patients analysed, 77.0% had active psoriasis and 64.4% had peripheral arthritis; 5.9%, 6.8%, 10.2%, and 3.6% had enthesitis, dactylitis, IBP, or sacroiliitis, respectively. Mean EQ VAS scores were significantly poorer in patients with vs. without enthesitis (59.9 vs. 75.6), dactylitis (63.6 vs. 75.4), and with greater peripheral joint involvement (none: 82.5; 1-2 affected joints: 74.1; 3-6 joints: 74.2; >6 joints: 65.0). Significantly worse mean PsAID-12 scores were associated with vs. without enthesitis (4.39 vs. 2.34) or dactylitis (4.30 vs. 2.32), and with greater peripheral joint involvement (none: 1.21; 1-2 joints: 2.36; 3-6 joints: 2.74; >6 joints: 3.92), and BSA (none: 1.49; >3-10%: 2.96; >10%: 3.43). Similar patterns were observed with HAQ-DI and WPAI scores.

CONCLUSION

Most PsA manifestations were independently associated with worse general, and PsA-specific QoL, physical function, and work disability, highlighting the need for treatments targeting the full spectrum of PsA symptoms to lower the burden of disease.

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis

Among the variety of clinical manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) – including peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis, and axial disease – spondylitis is the least studied. There is no generally accepted definition of axial PsA (axPsA), nor is there any common terminology or diagnostic criteria for it. In the rheumatology community, there is also no consensus regarding radiological and MRI assessment of axial involvement in PsA patients, while disease activity indexes and the therapeutic tactics are borrowed from those used in treating axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, despite a range of similarities in immunopathogenetic mechanisms of axPsA and axSpA, there are also certain differences that may affect the treatment response in these patients. The aim of this review is the analysis of data on axial disease in PsA. The article discusses the genetic features, clinical presentations, imaging techniques, differential diagnostics and treatment options of axPsA.

Effect of upadacitinib on reducing pain in patients with active psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis: post hoc analysis of three randomised clinical trials

Objective

Evaluate the effect of upadacitinib on pain outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) across 3 randomised trials (SELECT-PsA 1 and 2 for PsA; SELECT-AXIS 1 for AS).

Methods

Patients were randomised to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo (all 3 studies), or adalimumab 40 mg every other week (SELECT-PsA 1 only). Pain outcomes included proportion of patients achieving ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥70% reduction from baseline in patient global assessment of pain and other end points.

Results

A higher proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo achieved ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥70% reduction in pain end points as early as week 2; these improvements with upadacitinib were generally sustained or increased through year 1 (PsA 1/2 studies: 64%/48%, 58%/42% and 38%/22%, respectively; SELECT-AXIS 1 study: 76%, 72% and 54%). Results were similar with adalimumab in PsA 1 (59%, 49% and 32%). Patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib 15 mg were able to reach a similar level of improvement as the continuous upadacitinib groups by year 1 (PsA 1/2 studies: 46%–60%, 35%–49% and 15%–34%; AS study: 83%, 72% and 46%). Results were similar with other pain end points.

Conclusion

Rapid and sustained improvements in pain outcomes across several end points were consistently shown with upadacitinib over 1 year in patients with active PsA or AS who had either inadequate response to prior non-biologic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (PsA studies) or were biologic-naïve with inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (AS study).

Characterising axial psoriatic arthritis: correlation between whole spine MRI abnormalities and clinical, laboratory and radiographic findings

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of inflammatory and structural lesions using whole spine MRI in patients with psoriatic disease, and to assess their correlation with clinical features and with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) classification criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with whole spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJ) MRI, selected from 2 populations: (1) active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), irrespective of axial symptoms; (2) psoriasis with confirmed or suspected PsA and axSpA symptoms. MRI spondylitis and/or sacroiliitis (MRI-SpA) was defined according to Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) consensus and by radiologist impression. Agreement between MRI-SpA and different inflammatory back pain (IBP) definitions (Berlin/ASAS/rheumatologist criteria) and the axSpA classification criteria were calculated considering MRI as gold standard. Logistic regression determined MRI-SpA-associated factors.

RESULTS

93 patients were analysed (69.9% PsA; 30.1% psoriasis). Back pain was present in 81.7%, defined as IBP in 36.6%-57%. MRI-SpA was found in 9.7% of patients by ASAS definition and in 12.9% by radiologist impression, of which 25% had isolated spondylitis.Low agreement was found between the three IBP definitions and MRI-SpA. Rheumatologist criteria was the most sensitive (50%-55.6%) while ASAS and Berlin criteria were the most specific (61.9%-63%). axSpA criteria had poor sensitivity for MRI-SpA (22.2%-25%). Late onset of back pain or asymptomatic patients accounted for most cases with MRI-SpA not meeting axSpA or IBP criteria. Male sex was associated with MRI-SpA (OR 6.91; 95% CI 1.42 to 33.59) in multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of MRI-defined axSpA was low and showed poor agreement with IBP and axSpA criteria.

Psoriatic Spondylitis: A Disease Manifestation in Debate: Evidences to Know for the Clinical Rheumatologist

ABSTRACT

With the advent of classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), patients with axial manifestations associated with psoriasis, initially described in the l950s as a specific entity termed psoriatic spondylitis (PS), are now categorized within PsA, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and axSpA. Thus, different terms are used to describe axial disease in patients with PsA including PS, axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), and psoriatic spondyloarthritis. Patients with PS may present with inflammatory and/or mechanical back pain, but also may display axial disease on imaging despite not complaining of back pain. Cervical spondylitis has been reported in 35% to 75% of patients with PsA. Axial disease is silent in 20% and 25% of patients with axial PsA and PsA, respectively. The majority of axPsA patients have peripheral arthritis alongside the axial involvement, whereas only 2% to 5% of PsA patients have solely axial arthritis with no peripheral arthritis.A debate is currently underway as to whether inflammatory axial disease and psoriasis represent axSpA with psoriasis or a subset of PsA named axPsA. Studies have recognized that axial disease in PsA patients seems to be different demographically, genetically, clinically, and radiographically when compared with AS with or without psoriasis. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge regarding axial involvement of PsA in terms of history, terminology, classification, epidemiology, clinical presentation, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment, with the aim of providing advice for management of PS in clinical evidence-based practice. Data-driven studies are needed to develop clear, nonoverlapping classification criteria for spinal involvement in PsA.

Australian Consensus Statements for the Assessment and Management of Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Background

The understanding of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) has accelerated over the last decade, producing a number of practice-changing developments. Diagnosis is challenging. No diagnostic criteria exist, no single finding is diagnostic, and other causes of back pain may act as confounders.

Aim

To update and expand the 2014 consensus statement on the investigation and management of non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA).

Methods

We created search questions based on our previous statements and four new topics then searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. We assessed relevant publications by full-text review and rated their level of evidence using the GRADE system. We compiled a GRADE evidence summary then produced and voted on consensus statements.

Results

We identified 5145 relevant publications, full-text reviewed 504, and included 176 in the evidence summary. We developed and voted on 22 consensus statements. All had high agreement. Diagnosis of nr-axSpA should be made by experienced clinicians, considering clinical features of spondyloarthritis, blood tests, and imaging. History and examination should also assess alternative causes of back pain and related conditions including non-specific back pain and fibromyalgia. Initial investigations should include CRP, HLA-B27, and AP pelvic radiography. Further imaging by T1 and STIR MRI of the sacroiliac joints is useful if radiography does not show definite changes. MRI provides moderate-to-high sensitivity and high specificity for nr-axSpA. Acute signs of sacroiliitis on MRI are not specific and have been observed in the absence of spondyloarthritis. Initial management should involve NSAIDs and a regular exercise program, while TNF and IL-17 inhibitors can be used for high disease activity unresponsive to these interventions. Goals of treatment include improving the frequent impairment of social and occupational function that occurs in nr-axSpA.

Conclusions

We provide 22 evidence-based consensus statements to provide practical guidance in the assessment and management of nr-axSpA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00416-7.

Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, rheumatic disease characterized by inflammation of the sacroiliac joint, spine, and entheses. Axial spondyloarthritis affects up to 1.4% of adults in the United States and is associated with decreased quality of life, increased mortality, and substantial health care-related costs, imposing a high burden on patients, their caregivers, and society.

SUMMARY OF WORK

Diagnosing axSpA can be difficult. In this review, we seek to help rheumatologists in recognizing and diagnosing axSpA.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

A discussion of challenges associated with diagnosis is presented, including use and interpretation of imaging, reasons for diagnostic delays, differences in disease presentation by sex, and differential diagnoses of axSpA.

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

The early diagnosis of axSpA and advances in available therapeutic options have improved patient care and disease management, but delays in diagnosis and treatment remain common. Additional research and education are critical for recognizing diverse axSpA presentations and optimizing management early in the course of disease.

New Perspectives on Diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis by Imaging Techniques

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic inflammatory condition that can lead to severe functional impairment and irreversible damage. The diagnosis can be difficult in early cases where the clinical exam is often scarce. The lack of a serological biomarker can lead to a considerable delay in diagnosis. In this review, we discuss the existent imaging methods that have improved the diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The degree and type of musculoskeletal involvement cannot be assessed by only one imaging method. We think that a combination of methods is the best approach to evaluate both structural damage and inflammatory lesions and that ultrasound (US) could be the best tool to screen a patient when considering the diagnosis of PsA. US is an accessible, non-ionizing technique that offers information regarding active inflammation in joints, entheses, and soft tissues.

Frequency of pertinent MRI abnormalities of the sacroiliac joints of patients without spondyloarthropathies: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

MRI criteria are central to the diagnosis of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthropathy (nr-axSpA). The cardinal feature of nr-axSpa is inflammatory low back pain, which may be difficult to distinguish from highly prevalent non-specific low back pain. This study aims to determine the frequency of relevant MRI findings in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) of patients without Spondyloarthropathy (SpA), and therefore estimate the specificity of MRI scans for SpA.

METHODS

EMBASE and Medline were searched and limited to English. Titles were screened for relevance, with studies that included primary MRI findings in patients without SpA triggering retrieval. Retrieved papers were reviewed, data extracted by two authors and quality criteria (QUADAS 2) were applied. Findings were considered for asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.

RESULTS

The search recovered 2172 articles. Abstracts of 117 were reviewed for full text retrieval, 11 papers met eligibility criteria. These papers described MRI findings of 1180 asymptomatic patients and 1318 with low back symptoms but without SpA. In relevant populations, bone marrow oedema was found in 22% (95% CI 19-25) of asymptomatic and 20% (95% CI 18-22) of asymptomatic individuals. In all non-Spa patients, sclerosis was found in 13.4% and erosions in 6.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant frequency of diagnostically pertinent MRI abnormalities in the SIJ of patients without SpA. These are present in both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Findings, such as oedema and sclerosis, lack specificity and should be interpreted with caution. Erosions are less frequent and are likely more specific for SpA.

Axial Psoriatic Disease: Clinical and Imaging Assessment of an Underdiagnosed Condition

The frequent involvement of the spine and sacroiliac joint has justified the classification of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the Spondyloarthritis group. Even if different classification criteria have been developed for PsA and Spondyloarthritis over the years, a well-defined distinction is still difficult. Although the majority of PsA patients present peripheral involvement, the axial involvement needs to be taken into account when considering disease management. Depending on the definition used, the prevalence of axial disease may vary from 25 to 70% in patients affected by PsA. To date, no consensus definition has been reached in the literature and the definition of axial involvement in PsA has varied from isolated sacroiliitis to criteria used in ankylosing spondylitis. This article reviews the unmet needs in the clinical and radiological assessment of axial PsA, reporting the various interpretations of axial involvement, which have changed over the years. Focusing on both imaging and clinical standpoints, we reported the prevalence of clinical and radiologic features, describing the characteristics of axial disease detectable by X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and PET-CT, and also describing the axial symptoms and outcome measures in patients affected by axial disease.

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis: An update for rheumatologists

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogenous, chronic, inflammatory musculoskeletal disease that can lead to peripheral and axial damage and loss of function. Axial involvement occurs in 25% to 70% of patients with PsA, varying greatly depending on its definition, with the key manifestations being sacroiliitis and/or spondylitis. However, there are no agreed-upon classification or diagnostic criteria for axial involvement in PsA and no consensus on treatment paradigms, which complicates management of PsA. There have only been a few studies assessing biologics in patients with PsA with axial involvement, and most treatment plans are based on evidence from patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatologists therefore face many challenges in the management of axial PsA, including diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and choice of appropriate treatment. In this review, we summarize the clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, differential diagnoses, treatment options, and prognosis of axial PsA, with the aim of increasing rheumatologists' knowledge of this phenotype of PsA and thereby aiding its optimal management.

Imaging in psoriatic arthritis: Status and recent advances

The heterogeneous nature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), encompassing several domains, with varied presentations brings about considerable challenges in disease evaluation. Prompt diagnosis and targeted therapy have resulted in disease remission being accepted as an attainable goal in PsA. Imaging has played a pivotal role in early diagnosis, better understanding of pathogenesis, monitoring of disease, and as an outcome measurement tool in clinical trials in PsA. Conventional radiography has been the cornerstone of assessing structural damage. With the advent of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, better delineation of the various structures involved in the disease process is possible, thus enabling sensitive assessment of inflammatory and structural pathologies together. In this review, imaging modalities used in routine assessment and clinical trials in PsA will be discussed in detail, focusing on advances over the past 5 years.

Axial Psoriatic Arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current understanding of the prevalence, clinical features, outcome measures and recent therapeutic trials in axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA).

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of axPsA is estimated at 40-50%. However, the definition of axPsA remains unclear, therefore these estimates may be inaccurate. Ax PsA appears to be distinct from ankylosing spondylitis in demographic, clinical, genetic and therapeutic features. Because of the lack of widely accepted definition of axPsA it has been difficult to design therapeutic trials for this domain of PsA. Several studies have demonstrated the uniquness of axPsA. Few recent trials suggest that therapies that work for peripheral arthritis also work for axPsA.

Clinical features of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is associated with decreased quality of life. As delayed diagnosis may lead to progressive joint destruction and long-term disability, the key clinical features of PsA should be recognizable to a wide range of clinicians to facilitate early diagnosis. In addition to assessment and identification of skin and nail lesions, which occur in up to 85% of those with musculoskeletal manifestations, clinicians should be aware of both the peripheral and axial manifestations of musculoskeletal disease reviewed here. Peripheral joint diseases include polyarticular, oligoarticular, distal, and arthritis mutilans subtypes, and cognizance of these patterns of disease, as well as periarticular manifestations, including dactylitis and enthesitis, is useful for swift diagnosis of PsA. Axial psoriatic arthritis (axial PsA), also known as the spondylitis subtype, may be limited to the spine and sacroiliac joints, but may also affect peripheral structures. Meticulous history-taking and physical examination and familiarity with appropriate imaging studies are often necessary to distinguish axial-PsA from other differential diagnoses. Swift diagnosis and treatment are necessary to both control PsA disease and mitigate the risks of the many associate comorbidities that may accompany it.

Measurement properties of radiographic outcome measures in Psoriatic Arthritis: A systematic review from the GRAPPA-OMERACT initiative

BACKGROUND

Structural damage is as an important outcome in the Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Domain Set and its assessment is recommended at least once in the development of a new drug.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review (SR) to identify studies addressing the measurement properties of radiographic outcome instruments for structural damage in PsA and appraise the evidence through the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.1 Framework Instrument Selection Algorithm (OFISA).

METHODS

A SR was conducted using search strategies in EMBASE and MEDLINE to identify full-text English studies which aimed to develop or assess the measurement properties of radiographic outcome instruments in PsA. Determination of eligibility and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers with input from a third to achieve consensus. Two reviewers assessed the methodology and results of eligible studies and synthesized the evidence using OMERACT methodology.

RESULTS

Twelve articles evaluating radiographic instruments were included. The articles assessed nine peripheral (hands, wrists and/or feet) and six axial (spinal and/or sacroiliac joints) radiographic instruments. The peripheral radiographic instruments with some evidence for reliability, cross-sectional construct validity and longitudinal construct validity were the Ratingen and modified Sharp van der Heijde scores. No instruments had evidence for clinical trial discrimination or thresholds of meaning. There was limited evidence for the measurement properties of all identified axial instruments.

CONCLUSION

There are significant knowledge gaps in the responsiveness of peripheral radiographic instruments. Axial radiographic instruments require further validation, and the need to generate novel instruments and utilise other imaging modalities should be considered.

Prevalence of Nonradiographic Sacroiliitis in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Real-life Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To establish the prevalence of nonradiographic sacroiliitis within a real-life sample of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), using pelvic radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac joints (SIJs).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 107 consecutive adults with PsA (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis criteria). Participants completed clinical and laboratory evaluation, pelvic radiographs scored for radiographic sacroiliitis according to the modified New York (mNY) criteria, and noncontrast MRI of SIJs, scored by the Berlin score and categorized into active sacroiliitis using the 2016 Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria and the presence of structural sacroiliitis.

RESULTS

Radiographic sacroiliitis/mNY criteria were detected in 28.7% (n = 29), confirmed by MRI-detected structural lesions in 72.4% (n = 21). Active sacroiliitis was detected by MRI in 26% (n = 28) of patients, with 11% (n = 11) qualifying for nonradiographic sacroiliitis. Patients with radiographic and nonradiographic sacroiliitis had similar clinical characteristics, except for a longer duration of psoriasis (PsO) and PsA in the radiographic subgroup (PsO: 23.8 ± 12.5 vs 14.1 ± 11.7 yrs, P = 0.03; PsA: 12.3 ± 9.8 vs 4.7 ± 4.5 yrs, P = 0.02, respectively). Inflammatory back pain (IBP) was reported in 46.4% (n = 13) with active sacroiliitis and 27% (n = 3) with nonradiographic sacroiliitis. The sensitivity of IBP for detection of nonradiographic sacroiliitis was low (27%) and moderate for radiographic sacroiliitis (52%), whereas specificity ranged from 72% to 79% for radiographic and nonradiographic sacroiliitis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of active sacroiliitis among a real-life population of patients with PsA was 26%. However, the prevalence of nonradiographic sacroiliitis was low (11%) compared to the radiographic sacroiliitis (28.7%) seen in patients with longer disease duration. IBP was not a sensitive indicator for the presence of early-stage sacroiliitis that was commonly asymptomatic.

The Clinical Characteristics of Other HLA-B Types in Chinese Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients

HLA-B27 has an established relationship with the development of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). After reviewing the HLA-B genotype from 407 Chinese subjects (318 patients and 89 sex-matched controls), we found that 252 patients and 32 controls were HLA-B27(+) and that HLA-B^*27:04 was the dominant HLA-B27 subtype (N = 224). In all participants, HLA^*27:04 homozygous were only detected in two patients. In the HLA-B27(+) group, HLA-B40 was observed in 51 cases and one control (p < 0.05, OR = 7.87, 95% CI 1.05–59.0); of these, the most genotype was HLA-B^*27:04/B^*40:01(N = 38). Two hundred thirty-nine patients' clinical information was recorded. Cases with HLA-B27/B46 had more peripheral joint involvement (OR = 3.95, 95% CI 1.77–8.79) in HLA-B27(+) AS. HLA-B^*15:02 may be a significant risk element to peripheral joint involvement (p < 0.05) in HLA-B27(−) patients. Therefore, we believe HLA-B^*40:01, HLA-B^*46:01, and HLA-B^*15:02 can be the test indicators for AS diagnostic value.

Evaluating Inflammatory Versus Mechanical Back Pain in Individuals with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Review of the Literature

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by psoriatic skin and nail changes, peripheral joint inflammation, enthesitis, dactylitis, and/or axial involvement, either alone or in combination with each other. The presence of axial involvement has been shown to be a marker of PsA severity; however, there is no widely accepted definition of axial involvement in PsA (axPsA) or consensus on how or when to screen and treat patients with suspected axPsA. Chronic back pain is a prominent feature of axPsA and is thought to have a relevant role in early identification of disease. Chronic back pain can be caused by inflammatory back pain (IBP) or mechanical back pain (MBP). However, MBP can complicate recognition of IBP and delay diagnosis of axPsA. While MBP can also be associated with chronic back pain of ≥ 3 months in duration that is typical of IBP, IBP is characterized by inflammation of the sacroiliac joint and lower spine that is differentiated from MBP by key characteristic features, including insidious onset at age < 40 years, improvement with exercise but not with rest, and nighttime pain. This review discusses the differences in identification and management of IBP and MBP in patients with PsA with axPsA. The summary of available evidence highlights the importance of appropriate and timely screening, difficulties and limitations of differential diagnoses and treatment, and unmet needs in axPsA.

From Psoriasis to Psoriatic Arthritis: Insights from Imaging on the Transition to Psoriatic Arthritis and Implications for Arthritis Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the recent advances in the field towards the prevention and early recognition of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Defining the preclinical phase of PsA remains challenging since up to 50% of subjects with psoriasis have subclinical imaging enthesopathy, but many of these do not progress to PsA. Nevertheless, there is evidence that subjects with subclinical imaging enthesopathy are at increased risk of developing PsA. In recent years, it has been shown that both PsA and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are characterized by a subclinical phase of non-specific or brief duration arthralgia with shared imaging features accounting for joint symptomatology. Sonographically determined tenosynovitis and enthesitis are the key imaging features present in non-specific PsO arthralgia that are at risk of future PsA development. Furthermore, the early phases of PsA are complicated by factors including body mass index (BMI), which is a risk factor for PsA, but BMI is also associated with imaging abnormalities on enthesopathy. Fully disentangling these clinical and imaging factors will be important for enrichment for imminent PsA so that disease prevention strategies can be investigated. Psoriasis patients with arthralgia have a higher prevalence of tenosynovitis and imaging enthesopathy is at higher risk of transitioning to overt PsA.

Axial Psoriatic Arthritis: A Distinct Clinical Entity in Search of a Definition

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis is a well-recognized manifestation with a prevalence between 12.5% and 78%. This huge heterogeneity is due to the different criteria used by authors to define psoriatic arthritis with axial involvement combining clinical features with radiographic evidence of disease. Specific genetic and clinical attributes of axial psoriatic arthritis might differentiate it from axial spondyloarthritis with concurrent skin psoriasis. Few studies address the specific management. The purpose of this review is to acknowledge the current understanding of axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis and highlight the need for a definition to facilitate research and clinical recognition.

Psoriatic spondylitis or ankylosing spondylitis with psoriasis: same or different?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Of the four musculoskeletal domains of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the axial domain is the least studied. With the advent of targeted therapy that is efficacious in some but not all manifestations of spondyloarthritis (SpA), there is interest in understanding the similarities and differences between axial PsA (axPsA) and ankylosing spondylitis. Moreover, there is also interest in evaluating the axial domain in PsA clinical trials, domain that has traditionally been ignored in such studies. This review aims to summarize the current understanding of the differences between ankylosing spondylitis and axPsA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent observational studies have shown that axPsA forms part of the SpA spectrum, flanked by peripheral PsA on one side and ankylosing spondylitis on the other. Thus, axial disease is more severe in ankylosing spondylitis, whereas peripheral disease is more severe in axPsA. However, the overall disease burden and impact is similar. The expression of axPsA is influenced by age, disease duration, sex and HLA-B27 status.

SUMMARY

axPsA has not been properly defined hampering research into pathogenesis, disease impact and treatment. Research to define prevalence, clinical features, impact, similarities and differences with other axial SpA, and treatment is an unmet need.

Challenges in the clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic heterogeneous inflammatory musculoskeletal disease. The non-specific and often subtle manifestations make early diagnosis and subsequent treatment challenging. In the absence of diagnostic criteria and biomarkers, the diagnosis is often delayed leading to poor long-term outcomes. In addition, the differential diagnosis of a patient presenting with arthritis in the setting of skin psoriasis is wide due to symptom overlap with many other diseases. Peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis and axial arthritis are the 4 domains of musculoskeletal involvement in PsA and careful examination of each domain by a rheumatologist is the first step for a correct diagnosis. Other extra-musculoskeletal features such as the presence of uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, nail psoriasis and elevated acute phase reactants aid in the diagnosis of PsA. Screening patients with skin psoriasis using validated questionnaires might help in early diagnosis especially when coupled with imaging.