Comparison of autoantibody specificities tested by a line blot assay and immunoprecipitation-based algorithm in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Issues in autoantibody tests used in the classification criteria for autoimmune rheumatic diseases: the laboratory autoimmunologist's perspective

Classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases are an important means to define homogenous groups of patients that can be compared across studies for clinical trials and research purposes. The measurement of autoantibodies is a relevant aspect in the definition of classification criteria, with a significant weight in the scores necessary to classify patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The impact of autoantibodies has gradually increased over the years, contributing to the evolution and improvement of the classification criteria. However, these criteria often do not take into consideration how autoantibodies are measured, i.e. differences in diagnostic accuracy of the methods. This is a critical point especially when obsolete analytical methods that are no longer used in many clinical laboratories are taken into consideration. In this review we have critically examined assays and methods for the determination of autoantibodies that are (or could be) included among the classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in light of more recent evidence and technology evolution.

Autoantibody testing in myositis: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide an update on myositis autoantibody testing strategies. We have focussed on the reliability and usefulness of different myositis autoantibody detection methods, including commonly used solid phase immunoassays and newer discovery techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies have highlighted the limitations of currently available immunoassays, particularly when used in populations with low pretest probability and without supporting clinical evidence. While many autoantibodies, such as anti-Jo1, are detected with high sensitivity and specificity, the low incidence of myositis autoantibodies in tested populations reduces their positive predictive value. The low sensitivity of line immunoassays to detect key myositis autoantibodies, including anti-TIF1γ and rarer antisynthetase autoantibodies, is a concern.

SUMMARY

Myositis autoantibodies are widely accepted as important clinical tools, and hence, there is a significant demand for reliable, accessible, and affordable detection methods. False positives and negative results have the potential to impact on patient care, particularly for malignancy and lung disease associated autoantibodies. Increased availability of myositis autoantibody testing has led to a rise in requests from a broader range of clinicians. It is critically important that clinicians are aware of specific limitations of tests and interpret results in the context of clinical findings.

High Prevalence of Myositis-Specific and Associated Antibodies in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a serious condition linked to immune-system dysfunction. Myositis-specific/associated antibodies (MSAs/MAAs) play a role in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), but their significance in PH remains unclear. We believe the presence of these antibodies may be underestimated. This study analyzed adult PH patients without pre-existing IIM for MSA/MAA prevalence using a line-blot assay. We compared PH patients with and without ILD signs to a cohort clinically suspected of IIM/ILD (n = 558). Our PH cohort (n = 121) showed a significantly higher prevalence of overall weak positive MSAs/MAAs and positive overlap syndrome-associated MAAs than the suspected IIM/ILD group (p < 0.001). Notably, MSAs/MAAs were found in PH patients both with and without ILD, though more prevalent in those with ILD. Anti-synthetase and anti-overlap syndrome antibodies were the most common. Our study is the first to systematically show a high MSA/MAA prevalence in PH without IIM presentation. This highlights the need to consider PH when diagnosing MSA/MAA-associated conditions. We recommend MSA/MAA screening for newly diagnosed PH, especially in those with ILD, for early detection and potential immunomodulatory treatment. Further research should explore the link between MSAs/MAAs and PH, and the value of monitoring patients with weak MSA/MAA positivity over time.

Identification of connective tissue disease autoantibodies and a novel autoantibody anti-annexin A11 in patients with "idiopathic" interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Autoantibodies are a hallmark feature of Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD). Their presence in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease (ILD) may suggest covert CTD. We aimed to determine the prevalence of CTD autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with idiopathic ILD.

METHODS

499 patient sera were analysed: 251 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 206 idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and 42 cryptogenic organising pneumonia (COP). Autoantibody status was determined by immunoprecipitation.

RESULTS

2.4% of IPF sera had a CTD-autoantibody compared to 10.2% of iNSIP and 7.3% of COP. 45% of autoantibodies were anti-synthetases. A novel autoantibody targeting an unknown 56 kDa protein was found in seven IPF patients (2.8%) and two NSIP (1%) patients. This was characterised as anti-annexin A11.

CONCLUSION

Specific guidance on autoantibody testing and interpretation in patients with ILD could improve diagnostic accuracy. Further work is required to determine the clinical significance of anti-annexin A11.

Positive predictive value of myositis antibody line blot testing in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Line blot (LB) is in widespread use for myositis antibody detection. Yet, studies of its positive predictive value (PPV) in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), which would be of particular relevance to neuromuscular clinicians, are lacking. We aimed to determine the PPV of myositis antibody LB testing in patients with suspected IIM, and examine whether PPV was significantly impacted by intensity of antibody positivity.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent myositis antibody LB testing for suspected IIM between March 2019 and August 2022.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients who underwent testing for suspected IIM and had positive myositis antibody LB results, 43 (61%) were female and the median age was 61 years (range: 10-83 years). Forty-four were classified as true-positives, yielding a PPV of 63%. The PPV of patients with weak-positive myositis antibody results (14/30, 47%) was significantly lower than the PPV of patients with moderate-positive or strong-positive myositis antibody results (30/40, 75%) (p = .02).

DISCUSSION

Our study found that myositis antibody LB testing in patients with suspected IIM had a modest PPV, underscoring the need for antibody interpretation in the context of all available clinical and ancillary test data to avoid misdiagnosis. The significantly lower PPV in patients with weak-positive results emphasizes the particular importance of clinical correlation in such patients. Further study into the diagnostic performance of various LBs for myositis antibody detection is needed to inform their interpretation in clinical practice.

Autoantibody evaluation in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), generally referred to as myositis is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by muscle inflammation and/or skin involvement, diverse extramuscular manifestations with variable risk for malignancy and response to treatment. Contemporary clinico-serologic categorization identifies 5 main clinical groups which can be further stratified based on age, specific clinical manifestations and/or risk for cancer. The serological biomarkers for this classification are generally known as myositis-specific (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies. Based on the use of these antibodies, IIM patients are classified into anti-synthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis, and overlap myositis. The current classification criteria for IIM requires clinical findings, laboratory measurements, and histological findings of the muscles. However, the use MSAs and myositis-associated autoantibodies as an adjunct for disease evaluation is thought to provide a cost-effective personalized approach that may not only guide diagnosis but aid in stratification and/or prognosis of patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary autoantibodies that are specific or associated myositis. In addition, it highlights possible pathways for the detection and interpretation of these antibodies with limitations for routine clinical use.

Anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis: pathogenesis and clinical progress

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5-DM) is a subtype of dermatomyositis. Although the aetiology and pathology remain unclear, increasing evidence suggests that viral infection is a potential trigger of MDA5-DM. Multiple factors, including T cells, B cells, neutrophils and macrophages, are implicated in the pathophysiology of MDA5-DM. Distinctive skin rashes, rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, peripheral lymphopenia and elevated serum ferritin levels are the most prominent clinical and laboratory features of MDA5-DM. Concomitant infection is a common complication of MDA5-DM. The proper evaluation of patients with MDA5-DM requires knowledge of the disease heterogeneity and clinical course variability. Several biomarkers, including serum levels of anti-MDA5 antibodies and biomarkers related to macrophage activation, have been identified as useful tools for monitoring disease activity and prognosis. MDA5-DM shows a poor response to conventional glucocorticoid and immunosuppressant therapy and has a poor overall prognosis. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore the key pathogenic mechanisms of MDA5-DM and develop novel therapeutic options for patients. This Review discusses recent clinical progress and pathogenic findings of MDA5-DM.

Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myositis: an update on pathophysiology and clinical care

The childhood-onset or juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIMs) are a heterogenous group of rare and serious autoimmune diseases of children and young people that predominantly affect the muscles and skin but can also involve other organs, including the lungs, gut, joints, heart and central nervous system. Different myositis-specific autoantibodies have been identified that are associated with different muscle biopsy features, as well as with different clinical characteristics, prognoses and treatment responses. Thus, myositis-specific autoantibodies can be used to subset JIIMs into sub-phenotypes; some of these sub-phenotypes parallel disease seen in adults, whereas others are distinct from adult-onset idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Although treatments and management have much improved over the past decade, evidence is still lacking for many of the current treatments and few validated prognostic biomarkers are available with which to predict response to treatment, comorbidities (such as calcinosis) or outcome. Emerging data on the pathogenesis of the JIIMs are leading to proposals for new trials and tools for monitoring disease.

Severe rhabdomyolysis due to idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, a wary manifestation of a heterogenous pathology

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are historically classified by The Bohan and Peter criteria. The presentation of IIM is versatile and clinical-serological findings can aid in diagnosing the underlying form of IIM. Over the past years, the discovery and the use of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAA) have led to a more heterogeneous classification by the European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR).This paper describes a case of dermatomyositis sine dermatitis. A 70-year -old woman presented with complaints of muscle weakness and was admitted because of severe oliguric renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis. Despite treatment with hemodialysis and initial recovery, her clinic worsened again. The disease course in combination with electromyography findings, PET-scan results, and positive myositis-specific autoantibodies, that is, anti-NXP-2 antibodies, ultimately led to the diagnosis.Today, commercial kits based on line immunoassay and dot blot have mostly replaced the labor-intensive immunoprecipitation of RNA and/or proteins for detecting MSA. Though it makes routine testing of multiple MSA easy to implement in clinical practice, more validation studies are required and clinicians should be aware of its limitations, including false-positive results. When clinical suspicion for IIM is high, a negative screening for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) result does not exclude IIM and the first test of choice remains a multi-specific immunoassay for the whole spectrum of MSA.In this paper, we want to underline that there is no shortcut in diagnosing IIM. Caution is required in interpreting different EMG, PET-scan, histological, and laboratory findings. Especially in the case of rhabdomyolysis, as this is a severe and wary manifestation of myositis.

Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies in Fibromyalgia Patients: A Prospective Study

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common rheumatologic disorder characterised by widespread muscular pain. Myalgia is also a common clinical feature in Connective Tissue Disease (CTD), and FM should be studied for the concomitant presence of a CTD. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies (MSA/MAA) in a cohort of FM patients. We enrolled 233 consecutive FM patients (defined according to the 2016 criteria) that did not report clinical signs of autoimmune disorders and followed them for at least one year. The patients were tested for MSA/MAA with immunoblotting. FM patients were seropositive for Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA) in 24% of cases, for MSA in 9%, and for MAA in 6%. A specific diagnosis of CTD was made in 12 patients (5.2%), namely, 5 cases of primary Sjögren’s Syndrome and 7 of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy. Seropositive patients showed clinical features similar to those who were seronegative at baseline. A CTD diagnosis was associated with ANA positivity (p = 0.03, X2 4.9), the presence of a speckled pattern (p = 0.02, X2 5.3), positivity for MAA (p = 0.004, X2 8.1), and MSA (p = 0.003, X2 9.2). In conclusion, a non-negligible proportion of FM patients may be seropositive for MSA/MAA, and that seropositivity might suggest a diagnosis of CTD.

Performance of cut-offs adjusted with positive control band intensity in line-blot assays for myositis-specific antibodies

The diagnostic performance of band intensity (BI) cut-offs, adjusted by a positive control band (PCB) in a line-blot assay (LBA) for myositis-related autoantibodies (MRAs) is investigated. Sera from 153 idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) patients with available immunoprecipitation assay (IPA) data and 79 healthy controls were tested using the EUROLINE panel. Strips were evaluated for BI using the EUROLineScan software, and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and the Youden's index (YI) were estimated at non-adjusted or PCB-adjusted cut-off values. Kappa statistics were calculated for IPA and LBA. Although inter-assay CV for PCB BI was 3.9%, CV was 12.9% in all samples, and a significant correlation was found between BIs of PCB and seven MRAs (all P < 0.05). At adjusted BI (aBI) > 10, the negative conversion rate of myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positivity at BI > 10 was 11.5% in controls and 1.3% in patients. The specificity, AUC, and YI for MSAs at aBI > 10 or > 20 were higher than those at non-adjusted cut-off values. Additionally, AUC (0.720), YI (0.440), and the prevalence of MRAs with kappa > 0.60 (58.3%) were the highest at aBI > 20. The overall sensitivity and specificity for MSAs were 50.3% and 93.7% at aBI > 20, respectively, and 59.5% and 65.8% with BI > 10, respectively. The diagnostic performance of LBA can be improved using PCB-adjusted BIs. aBI > 20 is the optimal cut-off for IIM diagnosis using the EUROLINE LBA panel.

Myositis autoantibodies detected by line blot immunoassay: clinical associations and correlation with antibody signal intensity

The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between myositis specific (MSA) and myositis associated (MAA) antibodies and diagnosis (including idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [IIM] and other systemic autoimmune diseases [SAID]), and to explore the impact of antibody signal intensity in diagnostic accuracy. We retrospectively reviewed all the serum samples obtained from patients tested for MSA/MAA by line immunoassay (LIA) between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2020 in Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (Spain). Clinical true positive (CTP) MSAs and MAAs were defined as those patients with IIM or SAID with phenotypes expected of that MSA/MAA. Patients who did not have a phenotype compatible with that antibody were classified as clinical false positive (CFP). One hundred and thirty positive samples were analysed. Forty-six patients (33.38%) were classified as IIM, forty-two (32.3%) as SAID and forty-two (32.3%) as non-IIM/SAID. Among these 130 patients, 164 MSA/MAA were detected. Eighty-five (51.8%) positive MSA/MAA were classified as CTP, and seventy-nine (48.2%) as CFP. Strongly positive antibodies were more frequently CTP (35/47, 74.5%) than weak positives (54/68, 36.8%), (p ˂ 0.001). Antibodies classified as CTP had a higher signal intensity than CFP (36.77 AU vs 20.00 AU, CI95% 7.79-22.09, p ˂ 0.001). The probability of a CFP was associated to negative ANA, low ANA titer, and multiple positive MSA/MAA (p ˂ 0.001). In this study, we confirmed that CFP results using LIA are frequent, and are associated with low signal intensity MSA/MAA, negative ANA, lower titer ANA, and with multiple positive samples.

Coexisting autoantibodies against transcription factor Sp4 are associated with decreased cancer risk in patients with dermatomyositis with anti-TIF1γ autoantibodies

OBJECTIVES

In dermatomyositis (DM), autoantibodies are associated with unique clinical phenotypes. For example, anti-TIF1γ autoantibodies are associated with an increased risk of cancer. The purpose of this study was to discover novel DM autoantibodies.

METHODS

Phage ImmunoPrecipitation Sequencing using sera from 43 patients with DM suggested that transcription factor Sp4 is a novel autoantigen; this was confirmed by showing that patient sera immunoprecipitated full-length Sp4 protein. Sera from 371 Johns Hopkins patients with myositis (255 with DM, 28 with antisynthetase syndrome, 40 with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy, 29 with inclusion body myositis and 19 with polymyositis), 80 rheumatological disease controls (25 with Sjogren's syndrome, 25 with systemic lupus erythematosus and 30 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)) and 200 healthy comparators were screened for anti-SP4 autoantibodies by ELISA. A validation cohort of 46 anti-TIF1γ-positive patient sera from the University of Pittsburgh was also screened for anti-Sp4 autoantibodies.

RESULTS

Anti-Sp4 autoantibodies were present in 27 (10.5%) patients with DM and 1 (3.3%) patient with RA but not in other clinical groups. In patients with DM, 96.3% of anti-Sp4 autoantibodies were detected in those with anti-TIF1γ autoantibodies. Among 26 TIF1γ-positive patients with anti-Sp4 autoantibodies, none (0%) had cancer. In contrast, among 35 TIF1γ-positive patients without anti-Sp4 autoantibodies, 5 (14%, p=0.04) had cancer. In the validation cohort, among 15 TIF1γ-positive patients with anti-Sp4 autoantibodies, 2 (13.3%) had cancer. By comparison, among 31 TIF1γ-positive patients without anti-Sp4 autoantibodies, 21 (67.7%, p<0.001) had cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-Sp4 autoantibodies appear to identify a subgroup of anti-TIF1γ-positive DM patients with lower cancer risk.

Deciphering the Autoantibody Response to the OJ Antigenic Complex

(1) Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) are important diagnostic biomarkers. Among the rarest and most challenging MSA are anti-OJ antibodies which are associated with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS). In contrast to the other tRNA synthetases that are targets of ASS autoantibodies (e.g Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, KS, Zo), OJ represents a macromolecular complex with several ribonucleoprotein subunits. Therefore, the choice of the antigen in autoantibody assays can be challenging. (2) Methods: We collected two independent cohorts with anti-OJ antibodies, one based on a commercial line immunoassay (LIA) (n = 39), the second based on protein immunoprecipitation (IP) (n = 15). Samples were tested using a particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) system that allows for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to various autoantigens. For the detection of anti-OJ antibodies, two different antigens were deployed (KARS, IARS) on PMAT. The reactivity to the two antigens KARS and IARS was analyzed individually and combined in a score (sum of the median fluorescence intensities). (3) Results: In the cohort selection based on LIA, 3/39 (7.7%) samples were positive for anti-KARS and 7/39 (17.9%) for anti-IARS and 14/39 (35.9%) when the two antigens were combined. In contrast, in samples selected by IP the sensitivity of anti-KARS was higher: 6/15 (40.0%) samples were positive for anti-KARS, 4/15 (26.7%) for anti-IARS and 12/15 (80.0%) for the combination of the two antigens. 18/39 (46.2%) of the LIA samples generated a cytoplasmic IIF pattern (compatible with anti-synthetase antibodies), but there was no association with the antibody levels, neither with LIA nor with PMAT. (4) Conclusions: The combination of IARS and KARS might represent a promising approach for the detection of anti-OJ antibodies on a fully automated platform.

Screening and characterization of myositis-related autoantibodies in COVID-19 patients

An efficient host immune response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19) appears to be crucial for controlling and resolving this viral infection. However, many studies have reported autoimmune characteristics in severe COVID-19 patients. Moreover, clinical observations have revealed that COVID-19-associated acute distress respiratory syndrome shares many features in common with inflammatory myopathy including interstitial lung disease (ILD), most particularly rapidly progressive (RP)-ILD. This study explored this phenomenon by seeking to identify and characterize myositis-specific and related autoantibodies in 25 COVID-19 patients with mild or severe symptoms. Line blot analysis with the EUROLINE Myopathies Ag kit identified 9 (36%) patients with COVID-19 with one or more autoantibodies against several myositis-related antigens (Jo-1, Ku, Mi-2β, PL-7, PL-12, PM-Scl 75, PM-Scl 100, Ro-52, and SRP); no anti-MDA5 antibodies were detected. As the presence of antibodies identified by line blots was unrelated to disease severity, we further characterized the autoantibodies by radioimmunoassay, in which [³⁵ S]methionine-labeled K562 cellular antigens were precipitated and visualized by gel electrophoresis. This result was confirmed by an immunoprecipitation assay and immunoblotting; 2 patients exhibited anti-Ku70 and anti-Ku80 antibodies. Our data suggest that it is necessary to use more than one method to characterize and evaluate autoantibodies in people recovered from COVID-19, in order to avoid misinterpreting those autoantibodies as diagnostic markers for autoimmune diseases.

ELISA, protein immunoprecipitation and line blot assays for anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibody detection in cancer-associated dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVES

Anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies can be detected with immunoprecipitation (IP), line blot (LB) and ELISA. We compared assay performance in patients with DM and the potential of these assays to detect anti-TIF1-gamma positive cancer-associated DM (CADM).

METHODS

We included sera from 131 patients with DM followed at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden and 82 healthy controls. Serum samples taken at DM diagnosis were tested for anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies with IP, two ELISAs (in-house and commercial) and LB. Cancer diagnosis and dates were obtained from the Swedish national cancer register. CADM was defined as a malignancy that developed within 3 years of DM diagnosis.

RESULTS

Anti-TIF1-gamma autoantibodies were detected in 19/101 (18.8%), 15/113 (13.2%), 34/131 (26%) and 45/131 (34.4%) of the patients with IP, LB, in-house and commercial ELISA, respectively. The anti-TIF1-gamma results from the in-house ELISA were confirmed with IP in 93 of 101 (92%) cases, κ = 0.76, with a commercial ELISA in 110 of 131 (84%) cases, κ = 0.63, and with LB in 101 of 113 (89.3%) cases, κ = 0.67. Anti-TIF1-gamma results with IP were confirmed with LB in 85 of 92 (92.4%) cases, κ = 0.73. For detecting CADM, the anti-TIF1-gamma in-house ELISA had a sensitivity of 58% and specificity of 86%, the commercial ELISA had a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 82%, IP had a sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 92%, LB had a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 96%.

CONCLUSION

The two anti-TIF1-gamma ELISA assays had advantages both for autoantibody detection and to identify anti-TIF1-gamma-positive CADM.

A New Method for the Assessment of Myalgia in Interstitial Lung Disease: Association with Positivity for Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies

In this study, it was found that myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies (MSAs and MAAs) improved the recognition of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The objective of this study is to propose a clinical method to evaluate myalgia in respiratory settings as a possible tool for the recognition of MSA/MAA positivity in ILD patients. We prospectively enrolled 167 ILD patients with suspected myositis, of which 63 had myalgia evoked at specific points (M+ILD+). We also enrolled in a 174 patients with only myalgia (M+ILD-) in a rheumatological setting. The patients were assessed jointly by rheumatologists and pulmonologists and were tested for autoantibodies. M+ILD+ patients were positive for at least one MAA/MSA in 68.3% of cases, as were M-ILD+ patients in 48.1% of cases and M+ILD- patients in 17.2% of cases (p = 0.01 and <0.0001, respectively). A diagnosis of IIM was made in 39.7% of M+ILD+ patients and in 23.1% of the M-ILD+ group (p = 0.02). Myalgia was significantly associated with positivity for MSA/MAAs in ILD patients (p = 0.01, X2: 6.47). In conclusion, myalgia in ILD patients with suspected myositis is associated with MSA/MAA positivity, and could support a diagnosis of IIM. A significant proportion of M+ILD- patients also had MSA/MAA positivity, a phenomenon warranting further study to evaluate its clinical meaning.

Longitudinal assessment of reactivity and affinity profile of anti-Jo1 autoantibodies to distinct HisRS domains and a splice variant in a cohort of patients with myositis and anti-synthetase syndrome

Background

To address the reactivity and affinity against histidyl-transfer RNA synthetase (HisRS) autoantigen of anti-Jo1 autoantibodies from serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies/anti-synthetase syndrome (IIM/ASSD). To investigate the associations between the reactivity profile and clinical data over time.

Methods

Samples and clinical data were obtained from (i) 25 anti-Jo1⁺ patients (19 sera with 16 longitudinal samples and 6 BALF/matching sera at diagnosis), (ii) 29 anti-Jo1⁻ patients (25 sera and 4 BALF/matching sera at diagnosis), and (iii) 27 age/gender-matched healthy controls (24 sera and 3 BALF/matching sera). Reactivity towards HisRS full-length (HisRS-FL), three HisRS domains (WHEP, antigen binding domain (ABD), and catalytic domain (CD)), and the HisRS splice variant (SV) was tested. Anti-Jo1 IgG reactivity was evaluated by ELISA and western blot using IgG purified from serum by affinity chromatography. In paired serum-BALF, anti-Jo1 IgG and IgA reactivity was analyzed by ELISA. Autoantibody affinity was measured by surface plasmon resonance using IgG purified from sera. Correlations between autoantibody reactivity and clinical data were evaluated at diagnosis and longitudinally.

Results

Anti-Jo1 IgG from serum and BALF bound HisRS-FL, WHEP, and SV with high reactivity at the time of diagnosis and recognized both conformation-dependent and conformation-independent HisRS epitopes. Anti-HisRS-FL IgG displayed high affinity early in the disease. At the time of IIM/ASSD diagnosis, the highest autoantibody levels against HisRS-FL were found in patients ever developing interstitial lung disease (ILD) and arthritis, but with less skin involvement. Moreover, the reactivity of anti-WHEP IgG in BALF correlated with poor pulmonary function.

Levels of autoantibodies against HisRS-FL, HisRS domains, and HisRS splice variant generally decreased over time. With some exceptions, longitudinal anti-HisRS-FL antibody levels changed in line with ILD activity.

Conclusion

High levels and high-affinity anti-Jo1 autoantibodies towards HisRS-FL were found early in disease in sera and BALF. In combination with the correlation of anti-HisRS-FL antibody levels with ILD and ILD activity in longitudinal samples as well as of anti-WHEP IgG in BALF with poor pulmonary function, this supports the previously raised hypothesis that the lung might have a role in the immune reaction in anti-Jo1-positive patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02745-6.

A Commercial Anti-TIF1γ ELISA Is Superior to Line and Dot Blot and Should Be Considered as Part of Routine Myositis-Specific Antibody Testing

Objectives

Anti-TIF1γ is an important autoantibody in the diagnosis of cancer-associated dermatomyositis and the most common autoantibody in juvenile onset dermatomyositis. Its reliable detection is important to instigate further investigations into underlying malignancy in adults. We previously showed that commercial assays using line and dot blots do not reliably detect anti-TIF1γ. We aimed to test a new commercial ELISA and compare with previously obtained protein immunoprecipitation.

Methods

Radio-labelled immunoprecipitation had previously been used to determine the autoantibody status of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory myopathies and several healthy controls. ELISA was undertaken on healthy control and anti-TIF1γ sera and compared to previous immunoprecipitation data.

Results

A total of 110 serum samples were analysed: 42 myositis patients with anti- TIF1γ and 68 autoantibody negative healthy control sera. Anti-TIF1γ was detected by ELISA in 41 out of 42 of the anti-TIF1γ-positive samples by immunoprecipitation, and in none of the healthy controls, giving a sensitivity of 97.6% and specificity of 100%. The false negative rate was 2%.

Conclusion

ELISA is an affordable and time-efficient method which is accurate in detecting anti-TIF1γ.

An Italian Multicenter Study on Anti-NXP2 Antibodies: Clinical and Serological Associations

The identification of anti-NXP2 antibodies is considered a serological marker of dermatomyositis (DM), with calcinosis, severe myositis and, in some reports, with cancer. Historically, these associations with anti-NXP2 antibodies have been detected by immunoprecipitation (IP), but in the last few years commercial immunoblotting assays have been released. The aim of this collaborative project was to analyse the clinical features associated to anti-NXP2 antibodies, both with commercial line blot (LB) and IP. Myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies were detected in single centres by commercial line blot (LB); available sera were evaluated in a single centre by protein and RNA immunoprecipitation (IP), and IP-Western blot. Sixty patients anti-NXP2+ (NXP2+) positive by LB were compared with 211 patients anti-NXP2 negative with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM). NXP2+ showed a younger age at IIM onset (p = 0.0014), more frequent diagnosis of dermatomyositis (p = 0.026) and inclusion-body myositis (p = 0.009), and lower rate of anti-synthetase syndrome (p < 0.0001). As for clinical features, NXP2+ more frequently develop specific skin manifestations and less frequently features related with overlap myositis and anti-synthetase syndrome. IP confirmed NXP2 positivity in 31 of 52 available sera (62%). Most clinical associations were confirmed comparing NXP2 LB+/IP+ versus NXP2-negative myositis, with the following exceptions: inclusion-body myositis diagnosis was not detected, whilst dysphagia and myositis were found more frequently in NXP2 LB+/IP+ patients. The 21 LB+ /IP-myositis patients did not show differences in clinical features when compared with the NXP2-myositis patients and more frequently displayed multiple positivity at LB. Risk of developing cancer-associated myositis was similar between NXP2-positive and NXP2-negative myositis patients, either when detected by LB or IP. Protein-IP confirmed NXP2 antibodies in nearly 60% of sera positive for the same specificity with commercial assay. Double-positive cases rarely occurred in myositis patients with a clinical diagnosis other than dermatomyositis. Patients only positive by LB (LB+/IP-) did not display clinical features typical of NXP2. NXP2 positivity by LB should be confirmed by other methods in order to correctly diagnose and characterize patients affected by idiopathic inflammatory myositis.

A Comparison of Line Blots, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent, and RNA-immunoprecipitation Assays of Antisynthetase Antibodies in Serum Samples from 44 Patients

Objective To determine the differences between anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies among line blots, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) anti-ARS tests, and RNA-immunoprecipitation (IP) assays. Methods Sera from patients with confirmed or suspected antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) that were positive for either the anti-ARS test or the line-blot assay were used to perform an RNA-IP assay and ELISA to detect individual anti-ARS antibodies. Results Among the 44 patients, 10 were positive only in line-blot assays, 6 were positive only in the anti-ARS test, and 28 were positive in both assays. We compared the accuracy of these assays against the gold standard RNA-IP assay. The κ coefficient was 0.23 in the line-blot assay, but this increased to 0.75 when the cut-off was increased from 1+ to 2+. The κ coefficient was 0.73 in the anti-ARS test. The κ coefficient was 0.85 for positivity in both assays. Patients with ASS that was positive in an RNA-IP assay more frequently had mechanic's hand (62.1% vs. 20%: p=0.031), myositis (51.7 vs. 10%: p=0.028) and more ASS symptoms than those who were positive only in line-blot assays (3.48 vs. 2.2: p=0.019). Conclusions Clinicians need to understand the features of each assay and determine diagnoses by also considering clinical presentations. Diagnoses should not be judged based only on the results of line-blot assays due to the risk of a misdiagnosis from false positives.

Reliability of antinuclear matrix protein 2 antibody assays in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies is dependent on target protein properties

A line blotting assay (LB) is currently used to detect myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), because of its simplicity; however, the sensitivity and specificity of this assay is low. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the commercial LB in detection of antinuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP2) antibody. Seventy-seven serum samples from patients with IIMs, in which anti-NXP2 antibodies were detected through immunoprecipitation and western blotting (IP-WB) using K562 cell lysate, were enrolled. All samples were assessed by LB and IP-WB using recombinant human NXP2 whole protein (rNXP2) produced by insect cells, and the positive rates of each assay were compared. Thirty-two samples (41.6%) showed false-negativity by LB, which includes 11 samples with negative results by IP-WB using rNXP2. Relative intensities of IP-WB using cell lysate were significantly higher in the samples with positive results by both LB and IP-WB using rNXP2, compared to samples with positive by IP-WB using rNXP2 but negative by LB. Three of 11 samples with negative results by both LB and IP-WB using rNXP2 revealed high antibody titers. Further, differences in post-transcriptional SUMOylation were observed between recombinant and natural NXP2 proteins. In conclusion, the LB showed low sensitivity for detection of anti-NXP2 antibody, an effect exacerbated at low titers of anti-NXP2 antibodies. Moreover, there appears to be differences in the reactivities of antibodies to recombinant and natural NXP2 proteins with different post-transcriptional modifications.

Clinical profile and treatment outcomes in antisynthetase syndrome: a tertiary centre experience

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to describe the clinical profile and outcomes in patients with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) from a tertiary care centre.

METHODS

The clinical data and investigations of all patients classified as ASS by Connors criteria over 5 years were recorded, and they were followed up prospectively. The median (interquartile range) was used for descriptive statistics. Clinical variables between the Jo-1 and non-Jo-1 groups and between patients with and without anti-Ro52 antibodies were compared using the χ2 test. Survival analysis was done using the log rank test.

RESULTS

The 28 patients (23 females) had a median age of 42.5 (34.8-52.3) years, with a disease duration of 1.75 (0.6-3.8) years at diagnosis, and had a follow-up of 2 (0.25-4.25) years. Seronegative arthritis was seen in 23 of 28 patients. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia was seen in 19 patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Antibodies to Jo-1 (n = 17) were more frequent than non-Jo-1 antibodies (n = 11; five anti-PL-12, four anti-PL-7 and two anti-EJ). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of myositis (P = 0.07) or ILD (P = 0.11) between groups. Anti-Ro52 antibodies were more frequently found in the non-Jo-1 group (P = 0.006, ϕ = 0.51). A partial or complete improvement with treatment was seen in three-quarters of the patients. Five patients succumbed to the illness. Better survival was seen in the Jo-1 group (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The most typical presenting manifestation of ASS in our cohort was isolated seronegative arthritis. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia was the commonest ILD pattern. Patients with antibodies to Jo-1 had better survival compared with non-Jo-1. The non-Jo-1 aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases had a strong association with anti-Ro52 antibodies.

Prognostic values of anti-Ro52 antibodies in anti-MDA5-positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis associated with interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

Anti-Ro52 antibody often co-occurs with anti-Jo1 antibody in antisynthetase syndrome and their co-occurrence correlates with a more aggressive clinical phenotype and poorer prognosis. The strong association of anti-Ro52 antibody with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein-5 (anti-MDA5) antibody has been indicated in juvenile myositis. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of anti-Ro52 antibody in a cohort of adult patients with anti-MDA5-positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with interstitial lung disease (CADM-ILD).

METHODS

We assessed a cohort of 83 consecutive patients with anti-MDA5-positive CADM-ILD. Anti-MDA5 antibodies and anti-Ro52 antibodies were detected in immunoblotting and semi-quantitatively analysed by densitometry. Clinical features and the 24 month survival were compared between anti-MDA5-positive patients with and without anti-Ro52 antibodies.

RESULTS

Anti-Ro52 antibodies were found in 74.7% of anti-MDA5-positive CADM-ILD patients and were associated with an increased frequency of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD; 54.8% vs 23.8%; P = 0.014) and cutaneous ulcerations (27.4% vs 4.8%; P = 0.033). The cumulative 24 month survival rate tended to be lower in patients with anti-Ro52 antibodies than patients without (59.9% vs 85.7%; P = 0.051). The combination of anti-Ro52 antibody status and anti-MDA5 antibody levels further stratified patients' survival rates, showing that the survival rate of patients who were dual positive for anti-MDA5 antibody and anti-Ro52 antibody was significantly lower than patients with mild positive anti-MDA5 antibody alone (59.9% vs 100%; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Anti-Ro52 antibody is highly prevalent in anti-MDA5-positive CADM-ILD patients and their coexistence correlates with a subgroup of patients with more aggressive phenotypes. The combination of anti-MDA5 antibody levels and anti-Ro52 antibody status could help to predict patients' prognosis and guide risk-based therapy.

Immune recognition of lysyl-tRNA synthetase and isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase by anti-OJ antibody-positive sera

OBJECTIVE

Anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-ARS) antibodies are useful for identifying a clinical subset of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). Anti-OJ antibodies, which recognize multi-enzyme synthetase complexes including isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IARS) and lysyl-tRNA synthetase (KARS), are among the anti-ARS antibodies. Although testing antibodies to other ARSs have been used clinically, no validated immunoassays for detecting anti-OJ antibodies are available. We aimed to establish an anti-OJ ELISA.

METHODS

Serum samples were collected from 279 patients with IIMs and 22 patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Sixty-four of the samples that had been confirmed to be negative for anti-OJ by standard immunoprecipitation were used as the negative control, and 12 anti-OJ-positive reference sera were used as the positive control. Antibodies to IARS and KARS were assayed by ELISA using biotinylated recombinant proteins generated by in vitro transcription/translation.

RESULTS

The anti-OJ-positive sera strongly reacted with the KARS and IARS recombinant proteins in ELISA. Although all 12 reference sera were positive in the anti-KARS ELISA, 4 of the 64 anti-OJ-negative sera were also weakly positive. The sensitivity and the specificity were 100% and 93.8%, respectively. Since our anti-KARS ELISA performed well, showing a high agreement with the results for immunoprecipitation (Cohen's κ > 0.8), the remaining 237 samples were also tested. Thirteen anti-KARS-positive sera were newly found by ELISA, all of which were anti-OJ positive by immunoprecipitation.

CONCLUSION

Immunoassays for detecting anti-OJ antibodies using KARS and IARS recombinant proteins were developed. Our ELISAs performed well, with very high agreement of the results by immunoprecipitation and can be applied to the first reliable, easy-to-use measurement assays for anti-OJ antibodies.

Comparison of Lesional Juvenile Myositis and Lupus Skin Reveals Overlapping Yet Unique Disease Pathophysiology

OBJECTIVE

Skin inflammation heralds systemic disease in juvenile myositis, yet we lack an understanding of pathogenic mechanisms driving skin inflammation in this disease. We undertook this study to define cutaneous gene expression signatures in juvenile myositis and identify key genes and pathways that differentiate skin disease in juvenile myositis from childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

We used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skin biopsy samples from 15 patients with juvenile myositis (9 lesional, 6 nonlesional), 5 patients with childhood-onset SLE, and 8 controls to perform transcriptomic analysis and identify significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs; q ≤ 5%) between patient groups. We used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to highlight enriched biologic pathways and validated DEGs by immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Comparison of lesional juvenile myositis to control samples revealed 221 DEGs, with the majority of up-regulated genes representing interferon (IFN)-stimulated genes. CXCL10, CXCL9, and IFI44L represented the top 3 DEGs (fold change 23.2, 13.3, and 13.0, respectively; q < 0.0001). IPA revealed IFN signaling as the top canonical pathway. When compared to childhood-onset SLE, lesional juvenile myositis skin shared a similar gene expression pattern, with only 28 unique DEGs, including FBLN2, CHKA, and SLURP1. Notably, patients with juvenile myositis who were positive for nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP-2) autoantibodies exhibited the strongest IFN signature and also demonstrated the most extensive Mx-1 immunostaining, both in keratinocytes and perivascular regions.

CONCLUSION

Lesional juvenile myositis skin demonstrates a striking IFN signature similar to that previously reported in juvenile myositis muscle and peripheral blood. Further investigation into the association of a higher IFN score with NXP-2 autoantibodies may provide insight into disease endotypes and pathogenesis.

The phenotype of myositis patients with anti-Ku autoantibodies

OBJECTIVES

To define the clinical features of anti-Ku-positive myositis patients and to determine the reliability of the Euroline assay to detect anti-Ku autoantibodies.

METHODS

Serum samples were screened for anti-Ku autoantibodies by Euroline and positive samples were confirmed by ELISA. The prevalence and severity of clinical features at onset and during follow-up in patients with anti-Ku-positive myositis were compared to those with dermatomyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), the antisynthetase syndrome (AS), inclusion body myositis (IBM), anti-U1-RNP-positive myositis, and anti-PM/Scl-positive myositis.

RESULTS

72 (2.9%) of 2475 samples were anti-Ku positive by Euroline using the manufacturer's recommended cutoff of >15. Just 17 (23.6%) of these were confirmed by ELISA and considered anti-Ku-positive for the analysis. Comparators included 169 IMNM, 168 AS, 387 IBM, 20 anti-U1-RNP-positive, and 47 anti-PM/Scl-positive patients. Muscle weakness was a presenting feature in 38% of anti-Ku-positive patients; 81% developed weakness during follow-up. Anti-Ku-positive patients had increased distal weakness compared to the non-IBM comparators. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was present in 19% of anti-Ku-positive patients at the first visit and eventually developed in 56% of them. Throughout the course of disease, Gottron's papules and/or heliotrope rashes were less common in anti-Ku-positive patients (19%) compared to those with dermatomyositis (94%) or anti-PM/Scl-positive myositis (89%). Anti-Ku-positive patients never developed calcinosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The phenotype of anti-Ku positive myositis is distinguished by distal weakness, frequent ILD, infrequent rash, and no calcinosis. When used according to the current manufacturer's instructions, the Euroline assay has a high false-positive rate for anti-Ku autoantibodies.

Clinical characteristics of Vietnamese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and autoantibodies to aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinical phenotypes of anti-aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetases (aaRS) autoantibodies in Vietnamese patients of Kinh ethnicity with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study 23 patients with anti-aaRS autoantibodies were compared to 36 patients with other myositis-specific antibodies and to 69 seronegative patients with IIM. Assessments included muscle performance, extra-muscular involvement, and disease activity according to the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS). Sera were tested by a line immunoassay (Euroline Myositis Profile 4).

RESULTS

The frequency of anti-Jo-1 antibodies was 56.5%, anti-EJ antibodies 26.1%, and anti-PL-7 antibodies 17.4%, while anti-PL-12 and anti-OJ antibodies were not present in any case. All patients with anti-aaRS autoantibodies had signs of myositis. At time of investigation 22/23 patients had muscle weakness, 52.2% arthritis, 34.8% Raynaud's phenomenon, 73.9% fever, 14.3% mechanic's hands and 56.5% dysphagia. Interstitial lung disease was present in 52.2%, and pulmonary hypertension in 56.5%. The anti-aaRS autoantibody positive group had higher disease activity in the domains of skin and pulmonary disease compared to the seronegative group and had lower disease activity in skeletal disease compared to the anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5-positive patients. The clinical presentation of antisynthetase syndrome was similar between the aaRS autoantibody specificities with the exception of more frequent pulmonary hypertension in anti-Jo-1 positive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Different aaRS autoantibody specificities may vary between different ethnic populations for reasons that still need to be clarified. Furthermore, the high frequency of pulmonary hypertension is noteworthy but otherwise clinical manifestations associated with aaRS autoantibodies did not differ from other ethnic populations.

Dermatomyositis autoantibodies: how can we maximize utility?

The past 15 years has seen significant advances in the characterization of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and their associated phenotypes in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). As more careful studies are performed, it is clear that unique combinations of clinical and pathological phenotypes are associated with each MSA, despite the fact that there is considerable heterogeneity within antibody classes as well as overlap across the groups. Because risk for interstitial lung disease (ILD), internal malignancy, adverse disease trajectory, and, potentially response to therapy differ by DM MSA group, a deeper understanding of MSAs and validation and standardization of assays used for detection are critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment. Like any test, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of assays for various MSAs is not perfect. Currently tests for MSAs are helpful at minimum for a clinician to assess relative risk or contribute to diagnosis and perhaps counsel the appropriate patient about what to expect. With international standardization and larger studies it is likely that more antibody tests will make their way into formal schemata for diagnosis and actionable risk assessment in DM. In this review, we summarize key considerations for interpreting the clinical and pathologic associations with MSA in DM and identify critical gaps in knowledge and practice that will maximize their clinical utility and utility for understanding disease pathogenesis.

The reliability of immunoassays to detect autoantibodies in patients with myositis is dependent on autoantibody specificity

Objectives

In order to address the reliability of commercial assays to identify myositis-specific and -associated autoantibodies, we aimed to compare the results of two commercial immunoassays with the results obtained by protein immunoprecipitation.

Methods

Autoantibody status was determined using radio-labelled protein immunoprecipitation for patients referred to our laboratory for myositis autoantibody characterization. For each autoantibody of interest, the sera from 25 different patients were analysed by line blot (Euroline Myositis Antigen Profile 4, EuroImmun, Lübeck, Germany) and dot blot (D-Tek BlueDiver, Diagnostic Technology, Belrose, NSW, Australia). Sera from 134 adult healthy controls were analysed.

Results

Overall commercial assays performed reasonably well, with high agreement (Cohen’s κ >0.8). Notable exceptions were the detection of rarer anti-synthetases with κ < 0.2 and detection of anti-TIF1γ, where κ was 0.70 for the line blot and 0.31 for dot blot. Further analysis suggested that the proportion of patients with anti-TIF1γ may recognize a conformational epitope, limiting the ability of blotting-based assays that utilize denatured antigen to detect this clinically important autoantibody. A false-positive result occurred in 13.7% of samples analysed by line blot and 12.1% analysed by dot blot.

Conclusion

The assays analysed do not perform well for all myositis-specific and -associated autoantibodies and overall false positives are relatively common. It is crucial that clinicians are aware of the limitations of the methods used by their local laboratory. Results must be interpreted within the clinical context and immunoprecipitation should still be considered in selected cases, such as apparently autoantibody-negative patients where anti-synthetase syndrome is suspected.

The use and diagnostic value of testing myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies by line immuno-assay: a retrospective study

AIMS

Line immune-assays (LIA) for the detection of myositis-specific antibodies (MSA) are used widely for characterization of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Their current use and significance for the diagnosis of IIM remains unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we retrieved clinical diagnoses of patients tested for MSA and myositis-associated antibodies (MAA) Jo-1, Mi-2α, Mi-2β, TIF1γ, SRP, MDA-5, NXP-2, SAE, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, OJ, PM-Scl100, PM-Scl75 and Ku. We calculated clinical specificity, clinical sensitivity, negative- and positive predictive values (PPV) as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios.

RESULTS

In total, we analyzed 3167 samples. After exclusion of repeated measurements and patients with insufficient clinical information, data of 1118 patients were available for analysis. A total of 242 patients tested positive for at least one antibody, of which 45 patients had a diagnosis of IIM; 25 IIM patients were negative for all MSA/MAA. Clinical specificity of MSA/MAA for the diagnosis of IIM ranged between 94.2% and 99.9%. Clinical sensitivity and PPV across all antibodies tested ranged from 0.0% to 12.9% and 0.0% to 72.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice MSA/MAA are used widely for diagnostic work-up of IIM, resulting in a low pre-test probability. Clinicians should be aware that PPVs for most MSA/MAA are low.

Factors associated with treatment response in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. A registry-based study

Objective

To identify predictors of response to immunosuppressive therapy after 1 year, with a focus on autoantibodies, in patients newly diagnosed with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) followed longitudinally in an electronic registry.

Methods

We assessed the association between autoantibody‐defined groups and improvement according to American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2016 response criteria.

Results

We identified 156 patients; of those, 111 (71%) were positive for any autoantibody tested, 90% received glucocorticoid treatment at baseline, and 78% received immunosuppressive drugs at some follow‐up point. After 1 year from the index date, the overall median improvement score was 27.5 (interquartile range 10–51). No differences were observed in the total improvement score between the autoantibody‐defined groups. Overall, 62% of patients (n = 96) showed a minimal response, 38% (n = 60) achieved a moderate response, and 19% (n = 30) achieved a major response. Regarding the different levels of response, dermatomyositis‐specific autoantibodies were associated with a moderate response versus the seronegative group (reference), odds ratio 4.12 (95% confidence interval 1.2–16.5). In addition, dysphagia, time from symptom onset to diagnosis, and initial glucocorticoid dose were significant predictors of response after 1 year of follow‐up.

Conclusion

Patients with DM‐specific autoantibodies achieved better levels of response compared to other autoantibody‐defined groups. Dysphagia, a shorter time span from symptom onset to diagnosis, and intensive initial immunosuppressive treatment were associated with a higher response rate after 1 year of pharmacologic treatment from the index date, regardless of autoantibody status.

Myositis autoantibodies: recent perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of recent discoveries related to myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and assays used for their measurement.

RECENT FINDINGS

New autoantibody specificities have been reported including a MSA directed against eukaryotic initiation factor 3 and a myositis-associated autoantibody directed against heat shock factor 1. The association of anti-TIF1γ with cancer-associated dermatomyositis dependent on age has been confirmed in several large cohorts. Despite MSAs being almost entirely mutually exclusive, several myositis autoantigens are overexpressed in regenerating muscle and do not correlate with the corresponding MSA in any one patient. Further mechanisms may determine the final MSA specificity and are likely to include the need for autoantigen processing and presentation with adaptive T-cell help. The presence of CD4-positive T cells specific for histidyl tRNA synthetase protein in bronchial lavage fluid from antisynthetase patients lends support to this view. Finally, it is widely held that MSA do play an important role in clinical practice among some evidence and concern about commercial assay reliability.

SUMMARY

MSAs continue to provide important tools for clinical diagnosis and management as well as insights into disease mechanisms. Further improvement in the standardization and reliability of routine detection of MSAs is a high priority.

The association between myositis-specific autoantibodies and muscle pathologies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate specific muscle pathologies of different kinds of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients.

METHODS

One hundred eleven Chinese patients from Xiangya Hospital, Central South University diagnosed with IIMs according to European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) criteria were included. Clinical manifestation, myositis-specific autoantibodies, and histologic findings were evaluated to explore the pattern of necrosis, regeneration, and perifascicular atrophy, inflammatory cells in IIM patients with different MSAs.

RESULTS

Anti-SRP group has the lowest muscle strength scores, the highest creatine kinase levels, the most severe degree of necrosis and regeneration (1.90[0.80-3.95], 1.00[0.30-1.71]), and the lowest positive rate of MHC-I staining (35.71%). The anti-MDA5 group demonstrates the mildest pathological changes, with the fewest necrotic and regenerated muscle fibers (0.00[0.00-0.50], 0.00[0.00-0.00]), and the fewest inflammatory cell infiltration, and the highest muscle strength scores. The anti-NXP2 group has the most frequent inflammatory infiltrates, especially CD4+ T cells (31.14[15.00-39.00]). The patients with anti-NXP2 and the anti-TIF1γ antibodies show higher frequency of punched-out fibers (1.50[0.00-3.70], 0.00[0.00-1.00]) and perifascicular atrophy (71.43%, 55.56%). As for anti-synthetase antibodies (ASAs), the anti-Jo-1 group shows the most frequent rate of perifascicular necrosis (60%), while other ASA groups do not show perifascicular necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the MSAs, the anti-SRP antibody leads to the most severe muscle involvement, while the anti-MAD5 antibody the mildest. The anti-NXP2 and anti-TIF1γ groups have the most typical "DM" pathology. Key Points • Anti-SRP group shows severe muscle pathology while anti-MDA5 group shows the mildest. • Anti-NXP2 group has the most frequent inflammatory infiltrates. Pouch-out fibers and perifascicular atrophy are more prevalent in anti-NXP2 and anti-TIF1γ groups. • Anti-Jo-1 group is often accompanied by perifascicular necrosis, while other anti-synthetase antibody groups are not.

Extended myositis-specific and -associated antibodies profile in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

In systemic sclerosis (SSc) and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), auto-antibodies are used in daily practice as potent biomarkers of clinical phenotypes. This study aimed at estimating the prevalence of myositis-specific (MSA) and myositis-associated (MAA) auto-antibodies in a well-characterised SSc patients cohort using two different immunoblot assays, and studying their clinical associations.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the sera of 300 consecutive patients were tested at the same time with myositis antibodies Euroimmun® and D-tek® immunoblot assays.

RESULTS

Prevalence of MSA/MAA, MSA and MAA were 17.0%, 8.0% and 9.7%, respectively. When combining results of both tests, anti-PM/Scl 100 were found in 5.0% (95% confidence interval 2.8; 8.1); anti-PM/Scl 75 and anti-TIF1γ in 3.7% (1.8; 6.5); anti-Ku 3.0% (1.4; 5.6); anti-MDA5 in 1.3% (0.4; 3.4); anti-Mi-2 β, anti-NXP2, anti-PL-7 and anti-SRP in 0.7% (0.08; 2.4); anti-EJ and anti-PL-12 in 0.3% (0.01; 1.8) of patients. No reactivity against SAE1, Jo-1 or OJ was observed. Anti-PM/Scl 75 antibodies were associated with interstitial lung disease (80% vs. 42%) and myositis (27% vs. 3%); anti-Ku antibodies were associated with myositis (33% vs. 3%).

CONCLUSION

In this cross-sectional study of 300 SSc patients, the prevalence of MSA/MAA, MSA and MAA using immunoblot assays were 17.0%, 8.0% and 9.7%, respectively. MAA positivity was associated with ILD and myositis, but this study did not highlight any clinical associations with MSA positivity.

Anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies: warning lights of a tumour autoantigen

Anti-transcription intermediary factor 1 (TIF1)-γ autoantibodies are robustly linked with cancer-associated DM in adults. This review aims to give an overview of the physiological context of TIF1-γ and to determine whether there is a pathophysiological link between anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies and the occurrence of cancer. Detection of anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies has a high sensitivity and specificity for cancer-associated DM in adults and is therefore useful for both diagnosis and cancer risk stratification. The function of the autoantigen, TIF1-γ, may provide insight into the mechanism behind this association. TIF1-γ is a ubiquitously present protein involved in various biological pathways, including TGF-β signalling. In cancer, it can act either as a tumour suppressor or promoter, depending on the cellular context and cancer stage. Evolving data provide pathophysiological insights, linking anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies to both the anti-tumour response and to muscle and skin damage. TIF1-γ expression is increased in muscle and skin tissue of patients with DM. Mutations or loss-of-heterozygosity in TIF1-γ alleles in malignant tissue may result in the expression of tumour-specific neo-antigens stimulating autoantibody production. The newly formed autoantibodies are hypothesized to cross-react with antigens in muscle and skin, driving the development of DM. Based on the current evidence, anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies should be considered warning lights of a potential tumour autoantigen and should alert the physician to the possibility of an underlying cancer.

The promise, perceptions, and pitfalls of immunoassays for autoantibody testing in myositis

Background

A myositis-specific autoantibody can now be identified in the majority of patients with myositis. They identify homogeneous patient subgroups and are key tools in developing a personalized approach to disease management. There is substantial clinical interest in exploiting myositis autoantibodies as biomarkers, and consequently, a large number of commercial assays have been developed for their detection. These assays are already in widespread clinical use. In order to better understand perceived concerns from the international myositis community in relation to the reliability of these assays and how they are being used, we conducted a survey of international myositis experts, all of whom were members of the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies group.

Results

We collected data on the types of assay used, manufacturers, and the nature of the report provided by different laboratories and received 111 complete responses. Respondents also provided information on how they used the different assays, their confidence in the results, and how this influenced their clinical practice. Enzyme immunoassay/ELISA was the most popular assay method used worldwide followed by line blot. Line blot was the most popular method used in Europe. Despite concerns from over 80% of respondents regarding false-positive and false-negative results with the assay used by their laboratory, over 80% reported that the identification of a myositis autoantibody influenced their diagnostic confidence, the information they provided to a patient, and their recommended treatment.

Conclusions

In spite of ongoing concerns from the majority of users regarding the reliability of the results, myositis-specific autoantibody testing, using commercial immunoassays, is being used globally to inform clinical decision-making. These findings highlight the need for urgent guidance on the use of myositis autoantibody testing and on the interpretation of results. Knowledge of the reliability of currently available assays is essential given the importance already placed on myositis-specific autoantibodies as clinical decision-making tools.

Performance evaluation of a commercial line blot assay system for detection of myositis- and systemic sclerosis-related autoantibodies

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

A line blot (LB) assay is a multi-analyte platform capable of simultaneously detecting multiple anti-nuclear antibody specificities. Here, we evaluated the performance of a commercial LB assay developed for the identification of myositis- or systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related autoantibodies (autoAbs).

METHOD

We screened 300 serum samples from patients with various connective tissue diseases using an LB assay and compared the results of myositis- or SSc-related autoAbs with those identified by RNA and protein immunoprecipitation (IP) assays or indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).

RESULTS

The IP assays revealed anti-Jo-1 Abs in 14 patients, anti-EJ Abs in 12, anti-PL-7 Abs in 8, anti-PL-12 Abs in 4, anti-Mi-2 Abs in 6, anti-SRP Abs in 8, anti-topoisomerase I Abs in 54, anti-RNA polymerase III Abs in 24, anti-U3 RNP Abs in 9, anti-Th/To Abs in 9, anti-Ku Abs in 14 and anti-hUBF Abs in 4, whereas IIF identified anti-centromere in 35. Good agreement between the IP assays and the LB assay was found only for anti-Jo-1 and anti-centromere antibodies. When a cut-off was adjusted to reconcile with the results of IP assays, the detection performance of LB assay was improved for anti-EJ, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-SRP, anti-topoisomerase I and anti-RNA polymerase III Abs. However, the results of anti-Mi-2, anti-U3 RNP, anti-Th/To, anti-hUBF and anti-Ku Abs remained discordant between the LB assay and IP assays at all cut-off levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of myositis- or SSc-related autoAbs using a commercial LB assay requires great caution since it can yield analytically false-positive or false-negative results. Key Points • A line blot (LB) assay is a multi-analyte platform capable of simultaneously detecting multiple antibodies with anti-nuclear specificities. • Detection of myositis- or systemic sclerosis-related autoantibodies using a commercial LB assay requires great caution since it can yield analytically false-positive or false-negative results.

Autoantibody Biomarkers in Rheumatic Diseases

Autoantibodies encountered in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases bear clinical significance as a biomarker to help or predict diagnosis, clinical phenotypes, prognosis, and treatment decision-making. Furthermore, evidence has accumulated regarding the active involvement of disease-specific or disease-associated autoantibodies in the pathogenic process beyond simple association with the disease, and such knowledge has become essential for us to better understand the clinical value of autoantibodies as a biomarker. This review will focus on the current update on the autoantibodies of four rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, myositis, systemic sclerosis, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis) where there has been a tremendous progress in our understanding on their biological effects and clinical use.