2
|
Husivargova A, Timkova V, Macejova Z, Kotradyova Z, Sanderman R, Fleer J, Nagyova I. A cross-sectional study of multidimensional fatigue in biologic-treated rheumatoid arthritis: which variables play a role? Disabil Rehabil 2023:1-9. [PMID: 37731384 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2258333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite efficient biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients still suffer from high fatigue. This study aims to further our knowledge by assessing severity levels of the various fatigue dimensions and their associations with pain, sleep quality, and psychological well-being in bDMARDs treated RA patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The sample consisted of 146 RA patients (84.9% females; mean age 56.6 ± 13.6 years), who completed the MFI-20, SF-36, PSQI, GAD-7 and PHQ-9. Correlation analyses and multiple linear regressions were used to analyse the data. RESULTS General fatigue was the highest reported type of fatigue, followed by physical fatigue dimensions. In the final regression model, pain and disability were significantly associated with physical fatigue (p ≤ 0.001, p ≤ 0.05, respectively) and reduced activity (p ≤ 0.01, p ≤ 0.05, respectively). Anxiety was significantly associated with mental fatigue (p ≤ 0.05) and reduced motivation (p ≤ 0.01). Regression analyses showed no significant associations between depression, sleep quality, and fatigue in any of the final models. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that effectively addressing fatigue in RA patients requires an individualized approach. This approach should acknowledge the varying degrees of fatigue across different fatigue dimensions (physical or mental), while also taking into account the patient's mental health problems, pain levels, and disability levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Husivargova
- Department of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Vladimira Timkova
- Department of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Zelmira Macejova
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia & UNLP, Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Zuzana Kotradyova
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia & UNLP, Kosice, Slovakia
| | - Robbert Sanderman
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Joke Fleer
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Iveta Nagyova
- Department of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Kosice, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Bergstra SA, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Verschueren P, de Souza S, Pope JE, Takeuchi T, Hyrich KL, Winthrop KL, Aletaha D, Stamm TA, Schoones JW, Landewé RBM. Efficacy of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:95-106. [PMID: 36368906 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To update the evidence on efficacy of DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) and inform the taskforce of the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS This systematic literature review (SLR) investigated the efficacy of conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b), biosimilar and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs in patients with RA. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science were used to identify all relevant articles published since the previous update in 2019 to 14 January 2022. RESULTS Of 8969 search results, 169 articles were selected for detailed review and 47 were finally included. Trials investigated the efficacy of csDMARDs, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, DMARD switching, tapering and trials investigating different treatment strategies. The compounds investigated were csDMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine), bDMARDs (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, denosumab, etanercept, infliximab, levilimab, olokizumab, opineracept, rituximab, sarilumab, tocilizumab) and tsDMARDs (baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib). The efficacy of csDMARDs+ short-term glucocorticoids in early RA was confirmed and similar to bDMARD+MTX combination therapy. Interleukin-6 pathway inhibition was effective in trials on olokizumab and levilimab. Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was efficacious in different patient populations. After insufficient response to JAKi, patients could respond to TNFi treatment. Tapering of DMARDs was feasible for a proportion of patients, who were able to taper therapy while remaining in low disease activity or remission. CONCLUSION The results of this SLR, together with one SLR on safety of DMARD and one on glucocorticoids, informed the taskforce of the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for pharmacological management of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sytske Anne Bergstra
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Christopher John Edwards
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Patrick Verschueren
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven and Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Savia de Souza
- Patient Research Partner Network, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Janet E Pope
- Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kevin L Winthrop
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roux N, Poussing S, Maurier F. Case of reactive sacroiliitis possibly induced by an mRNA coronavirus disease vaccine. BMJ Case Rep 2022; 15:e249063. [PMID: 35798496 PMCID: PMC9263939 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-249063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A woman in her 30s received a second dose, first booster, Corminaty vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2. Three days later, the patient developed unilateral sacroiliitis. A pelvic scan revealed inflammatory joint edges, bone erosion and a heterogeneous mass of 2.5 cm in the psoas muscle. Joint puncture revealed no microcrystalline deposits, but bone marrow cells, erythroblast were identified. The standard bacterial cultures and culture for mycobacteria were negative. HLA B27 was negative, and no seroconversion was identified for HIV, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, chlamydia or Quantiferon. Two months later, the sacroiliitis resolved.The aetiologic approach of this erosive unilateral acute sacroiliitis in a person naïve to rheumatologic pathology was negative for inflammatory or infectious sacroiliitis. Arthralgias after vaccination are expected. Arthritis is less common, and acute sacroiliitis has not yet been described. Acute sacroiliitis may be considered a reactive sacroiliitis to the anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Roux
- Rheumatology Department, UNEOS Hôpitaux Privés de Metz, Metz-Vantoux, Lorraine, France
| | - Sophie Poussing
- Biological Laboratory, UNEOS Hopitaux Prives de Metz, Metz, Lorraine, France
| | - François Maurier
- Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology Department, UNEOS Hopitaux Prives de Metz, Metz-Vantoux, Lorraine, France
| |
Collapse
|