Progression of radiological changes in rheumatoid arthritis

RheuMetric Quantitative 0 to 10 Physician Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Distress in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Validation Against Reference Measures

OBJECTIVE

To analyze a RheuMetric checklist, which includes four feasible physician 0 to 10 scores for DOCGL, inflammation (DOCINF), damage (DOCDAM), and distress (DOCSTR) for criterion and discriminant validity against standard reference measures.

METHODS

A prospective, cross-sectional assessment was performed at one routine care visit at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Rheumatologists recorded DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, DOCSTR, and 28 joint counts for swelling (SJC), tenderness (TJC), and limited motion/deformity (DJC). Patients completed a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), which includes routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3), fibromyalgia assessment screening tool (FAST4), and MDHAQ depression screen (MDS2). Laboratory tests and radiographic scores were recorded. RheuMetric estimates of inflammation, damage, and distress were compared with reference and other measures using correlations and linear regressions.

RESULTS

In 173 patients with RA, variation in RheuMetric DOCINF was explained significantly by SJC and inversely by disease duration; variation in DOCDAM was explained significantly by DJC, radiographic scores, and physical function; and variation in DOCSTR was explained significantly by fibromyalgia and depression.

CONCLUSION

RheuMetric DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCSTR estimates were correlated significantly and specifically with reference measures of inflammation, damage, and distress, documenting criterion and discriminant validity.

Factors Associated with Five-year Deterioration of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives We investigated the factors associated with the deterioration of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) over five years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Clinical data were obtained from 391 patients who were classified into 2 groups: a group with HAQ-DI deterioration (in which the HAQ-DI had worsened) and a group without HAQ-DI deterioration. A multivariable logistic regression analyses of the age, sex, disease duration, body mass index, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, the use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, methotrexate use, glucocorticoid use, C-reactive protein, pain visual analog scale (pain VAS), disease activity score 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), the HAQ-DI, and van der Heijde modified total Sharp score was performed at baseline and five years to determine significant factors associated with the HAQ-DI. Results The significant factors associated with HAQ-DI deterioration were age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.08), glucocorticoid use (OR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.03-3.71), DAS28-ESR (OR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.33-2.79), change in pain VAS from baseline (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), and change in DAS28-ESR from baseline (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.15-2.44). Conclusion The present study suggests that glucocorticoid tapering as well as disease activity and pain control are required to prevent deterioration of the HAQ-DI in patients with RA.

Susceptibility of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1-deficient mice to rheumatoid arthritis arising from interleukin-1β-induced inflammation

We recently reported that cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 (p21) deficiency induces osteoarthritis susceptibility. Here, we determined the mechanism underlying the effect of p21 in synovial and cartilage tissues in RA. The knee joints of p21-knockout (p21^-/-) (n = 16) and wild type C57BL/6 (p21^+/+) mice (n = 16) served as in vivo models of collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA). Arthritis severity was evaluated by immunological and histological analyses. The response of p21 small-interfering RNA (siRNA)-treated human RA FLSs (n = 5 per group) to interleukin (IL)-1β stimulation was determined in vitro. Arthritis scores were higher in p21^-/- mice than in p21^+/+ mice. More severe synovitis, earlier loss of Safranin-O staining, and cartilage destruction were observed in p21^-/- mice compared to p21^+/+ mice. p21^-/- mice expressed higher levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, F4/80, CD86, p-IKKα/β, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in cartilage and synovial tissues via IL-1β-induced NF-kB signaling. IL-1β stimulation significantly increased IL-6, IL-8, and MMP expression, and enhanced IKKα/β and IκBα phosphorylation in human FLSs. p21-deficient CAIA mice are susceptible to RA phenotype alterations, including joint cartilage destruction and severe synovitis. Therefore, p21 may have a regulatory role in inflammatory cytokine production including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α.

Outcomes of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

The objective of this study was to evaluate implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and radiographic outcomes of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients who underwent a primary cementless posterior-stabilized TKA and who had RA were reviewed. A total of 126 TKAs in 122 patients who had a mean follow-up of 4 years were analyzed. Implant survivorship was calculated. Postoperative clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed at approximately 6 weeks and 3 months and then annually. Changes in range of motion and Knee Society scores were noted. Radiographic evaluation was conducted as part of the follow-up process. Implant survivorship was 99.2%, with 1 aseptic failure. At final follow-up, mean extension and flexion were 2° (range, 0°-10°) and 124° (range, 95°-140°), respectively. Mean Knee Society pain and function scores were 92 points (range, 80-100 points) and 84 points (range, 70-90 points), respectively. There were no surgical complications. No progressive radiolucencies, loosening, or subsidence were noted except from the single aseptic failure reported. This study reports excellent survivorship and clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless TKAs in RA patients. Although the decision regarding whether to use cemented or cementless TKAs in these patients should be based on surgeon experience and patient characteristics, the recent advances in implant fixation of cementless TKAs indicate no salient contraindications for RA patients. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(2):103-106.].

Rheumatoid factor, not antibodies against citrullinated proteins, is associated with baseline disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Although the prognostic value of rheumatoid factor (RF) and autoantibodies against citrullinated proteins (ACPAs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well established, their association with RA disease activity remains unclear. Here, we investigate this association in a large study using data from clinical trials.

METHODS

We used baseline data from four recent randomized controlled clinical trials of RA. We investigated individual and composite measures of disease activity. The relationship of RF and ACPAs with these measures was investigated by using stratified analysis (comparing four groups of patients according to the presence or absence of RF and ACPAs) and matched analysis (disease activity levels compared between patients negative and patients highly positive for one autoantibody who were matched for levels of the other autoantibody as well as for age, gender, and duration of RA).

RESULTS

A total of 2118 patients were analysed in the different cohorts. In the stratified analysis, RF(+) patients, regardless of ACPA status, had the highest levels of disease activity, whereas ACPA(+) patients had disease activity that was similar to or lower than that of ACPA(-) patients, both in the presence and in the absence of RF. When matched for ACPA levels, patients with highly positive RF had significantly higher disease activity for all composite indices compared with patients who were RF(-) (P = 0.0067), whereas ACPA-highly-positive and ACPA-negative patients matched for RF levels had similar disease activity, again even with the tendency toward lower disease activity for ACPA(+) patients (P = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

The data presented suggest that the presence of RF has a clear association with higher levels of disease activity but that the presence of ACPAs has not and even appears to be associated with lower disease activity.

Randomised controlled trial of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors against combination intensive therapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in established rheumatoid arthritis: the TACIT trial and associated systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is initially treated with methotrexate and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Active RA patients who fail such treatments can receive tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), which are effective but expensive.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed whether or not combination DMARDs (cDMARDs) give equivalent clinical benefits at lower costs in RA patients eligible for TNFis.

DESIGN

An open-label, 12-month, pragmatic, randomised, multicentre, two-arm trial [Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors Against Combination Intensive Therapy (TACIT)] compared these treatment strategies. We then systematically reviewed all comparable published trials.

SETTING

The TACIT trial involved 24 English rheumatology clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Active RA patients eligible for TNFis.

INTERVENTIONS

The TACIT trial compared cDMARDs with TNFis plus methotrexate or another DMARD; 6-month non-responders received (a) TNFis if in the cDMARD group; and (b) a second TNFi if in the TNFi group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Heath Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) was the primary outcome measure. The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), joint damage, Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28), withdrawals and adverse effects were secondary outcome measures. Economic evaluation linked costs, HAQ changes and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

RESULTS

In total, 432 patients were screened; 104 started on cDMARDs and 101 started on TNFis. The initial demographic and disease assessments were similar between the groups. In total, 16 patients were lost to follow-up (nine in the cDMARD group, seven in the TNFi group) and 42 discontinued their intervention but were followed up (23 in the cDMARD group and 19 in the TNFi group). Intention-to-treat analysis with multiple imputation methods used for missing data showed greater 12-month HAQ score reductions with initial cDMARDs than with initial TNFis [adjusted linear regression coefficient 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.003 to 0.31; p = 0.046]. Increases in 12-month EQ-5D scores were greater with initial cDMARDs (adjusted linear regression coefficient -0.11, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.03; p = 0.009) whereas 6-month changes in HAQ and EQ-5D scores and 6- and 12-month changes in joint damage were similar between the initial cDMARD group and the initial TNFi group. Longitudinal analyses (adjusted general estimating equations) showed that the DAS28 was lower in the initial TNFi group in the first 6 months (coefficient -0.63, 95% CI -0.93 to -0.34; p < 0.001) but there were no differences between the groups in months 6-12. In total, 36 patients in the initial cDMARD group and 44 in the initial TNFi group achieved DAS28 remission. The onset of remission did not differ between groups (p = 0.085 on log-rank test). In total, 10 patients in the initial cDMARD group and 18 in the initial TNFi group experienced serious adverse events; stopping therapy because of toxicity occurred in 10 and six patients respectively. Economic evaluation showed that the cDMARD group had similar or better QALY outcomes than TNFi with significantly lower costs at 6 and 12 months. In the systematic reviews we identified 32 trials (including 20-1049 patients) on early RA and 19 trials (including 40-982 patients) on established RA that compared (1) cDMARDs with DMARD monotherapy; (2) TNFis/methotrexate with methotrexate monotherapy; and (3) cDMARDs with TNFis/methotrexate. They showed that cDMARDs and TNFis had similar efficacies and toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Active RA patients who have failed methotrexate and another DMARD achieve equivalent clinical benefits at a lower cost from starting cDMARDs or from starting TNFis (reserving TNFis for non-responders). Only a minority of patients achieve sustained remission with cDMARDs or TNFis; new strategies are needed to maximise the frequency of remission.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Control Trials ISRCTN37438295.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 18, No. 66. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: strategies, opportunities and challenges

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered a chronic disease that cannot be cured. Biologic agents have enabled good therapeutic successes; however, the response to biologic therapy depends on treatment history and, especially, disease duration. In general, the more drug-experienced the patients, the lower the response rates, although this limitation can be overcome by promptly adjusting or switching treatment in a treat-to-target approach. Another challenge is the question of how long therapy should be continued once the treatment target, which should be remission or at least a state of low disease activity, has been reached. The data available suggest that, in most patients with established disease, cessation of biologic therapy will be followed by disease flares, whereas a reduction of dose or an increase in the interval between doses enables maintenance of treatment success. Induction therapy very early in the disease course followed by withdrawal of the biologic agent might also be a feasible approach to attain sustained good outcomes, but currently available data are not strong enough to allow for such a conclusion to be reached. Taken together, this underscores the importance of research into the cause(s) of RA so that curative therapies can be developed.

Clinical trials documenting the efficacy of low-dose glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis

Twelve clinical trials have documented that prednisone or prednisolone in doses of 10 mg/day or less is efficacious to improve function, maintain status and/or slow radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). An early trial reported by de Andrade et al. [Ann Rheum Dis 1964;23:158-162] in 1964 indicated that 5 mg of prednisolone at night was preferred to 5 mg of prednisone in the morning. Harris et al. [J Rheumatol 1983;10:713-721] documented the efficacy of 5 mg/day of prednisone in a non-double-blind trial in 1983. Two important trials in the 1990s by Kirwan [N Engl J Med 1995;333:142-146] using 7.5 mg/day, and the COBRA study by Boers et al. [Lancet 1997;350:309-318] with step-down from 60 mg rapidly tapered to 5 mg/day led to strong advocacy of low-dose glucocorticoids. In 2002, the first Utrecht Study [Ann Intern Med 2002;136:1-12] indicated that 10 mg/day prednisone slowed radiographic progression, a finding confirmed and extended in 2005 by Svensson et al. [Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3360-3370] with 7.5 mg/day, and Wassenberg et al. [Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3371-3380] with 5 mg/day of prednisolone. In 2008, Buttgereit et al. [Lancet 2008;371:205-214] reported CAPRA-1, which documented that modified-release prednisone or prednisolone taken at bedtime led to lower morning stiffness and IL-6 levels compared to usual morning prednisone. In 2009, Pincus et al. [Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1715-1720] reported a withdrawal clinical trial, in which patients who took 3 mg/day were gradually withdrawn to placebo, and dropped out at a significantly higher rate than control patients who were 'withdrawn' to prednisone. In 2012, a second Utrecht Study [Ann Intern Med 2012;156:329-339], CAMERA-II, documented that 10 mg of prednisone added to a 'treat-to-target' strategy with methotrexate provided incremental slowing of radiographic progression. An Italian study of patients with early RA who received step-up disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy over 2 years plus prednisolone or not indicated higher rates of clinical remission and sustained remission associated with 7.5 mg/day of prednisolone [Arthritis Res Ther 2012; 14:R112]. The CAPRA-2 trial [Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:204-210] documented that modified-release nighttime prednisone or prednisolone was significantly more efficacious than placebo. Taken together, these 12 clinical trials indicate that low-dose glucocorticoids prednisone or prednisolone provides symptomatic relief, improved functional status and slowing of radiographic progression for patients with RA. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

The past versus the present, 1980-2004: reduction of mean initial low-dose, long-term glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis from 10.3 to 3.6 mg/day, concomitant with early methotrexate, with long-term effectiveness and safety of less than 5 mg/day

Quantitative observations are presented concerning treatment with glucocorticoids of 308 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at a weekly academic rheumatology setting over 25 years from 1980 to 2004. A database of all visits included medications and multidimensional health assessment questionnaire scores for physical function, pain and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3; and a surrogate RAPID3-EST), completed by each patient at each visit in routine care. Over the 5-year periods of 1980-1984, 1985-1989, 1990-1994, 1995-1999 and 2000-2004, the mean initial prednisone daily dose declined from 10.3 to 6.5, 5.1, 4.1 and 3.6 mg/day, as initial doses were >5 mg/day in 49, 16, 7, 7 and 3% of patients, 5 mg/day in 51, 80, 70, 26 and 10%, and <5 mg/day in 0, 4, 23, 67 and 86%. Reduction of prednisone doses in the respective five-year periods was accompanied by increased and earlier use of methotrexate as the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in 10, 26, 57, 71 and 78%, and methotrexate treatment in 10, 26, 74, 82 and 92% of patients within the first year of disease. Higher methotrexate doses in the respective five-year periods were used after 1990, along with lower prednisone doses. Most patients were treated indefinitely with both low-dose prednisone and methotrexate; 80% continued both medications for more than 5 years. The primary adverse events were skin-thinning and bruising. New hypertension, diabetes and cataracts were seen in fewer than 10% of patients. While efficacy and safety cannot be analyzed definitively from observational data, the data suggest that many patients with RA might be treated effectively with weekly low-dose methotrexate along with initial and long-term, low-dose prednisone of <5 mg/day.

Clinical disease activity and acute phase reactant levels are discordant among patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: acute phase reactant levels contribute separately to predicting outcome at one year

Introduction

Clinical trials of new treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) typically require subjects to have an elevated acute phase reactant (APR), in addition to tender and swollen joints. However, despite the elevation of individual components of the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (tender and swollen joint counts and patient and physician global assessment), some patients with active RA may have normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and/or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and thus fail to meet entry criteria for clinical trials. We assessed the relationship between CDAI and APRs in the Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America (CORRONA) registry by comparing baseline characteristics and one-year clinical outcomes of patients with active RA, grouped by baseline APR levels.

Methods

This was an observational study of 9,135 RA patients who had both ESR and CRP drawn and a visit at which CDAI was >2.8 (not in remission).

Results

Of 9,135 patients with active RA, 58% had neither elevated ESR nor CRP; only 16% had both elevated ESR and CRP and 26% had either ESR or CRP elevated. Among the 4,228 patients who had a one-year follow-up visit, both baseline and one-year follow-up modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) and CDAI scores were lowest for patients with active RA but with neither APR elevated; both mHAQ and CDAI scores increased sequentially with the increase in number of elevated APR levels at baseline. Each individual component of the CDAI followed the same trend, both at baseline and at one-year follow-up. The magnitude of improvement in both CDAI and mHAQ scores at one year was associated positively with the number of APRs elevated at baseline.

Conclusions

In a large United States registry of RA patients, APR levels often do not correlate with disease activity as measured by joint counts and global assessments. These data strongly suggest that it is appropriate to obtain both ESR and CRP from RA patients at the initial visit. Requiring an elevation in APR levels as a criterion for inclusion of RA patients in studies of experimental agents may exclude some patients with active disease.

Total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis patients with large tibial condyle defects

PURPOSE

To review clinical results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with large bone defects of the tibial condyle.

METHODS

Records of 33 knees in 27 women and 3 men aged 44 to 80 (mean, 63.6) years who underwent primary TKA for RA with large tibial bone defects were reviewed. 16 knees had peripheral defects extending to the bone cortex, whereas 17 knees had central defects that did not extend to the bone cortex. The femorotibial angle (FTA) was <170º in 15 knees, 170º to 180º in 3 knees, and >180º in 15 knees. The mean duration of RA was 13.5 (range, 3-35) years. In 14 knees with severe bone defects, bone grafts (harvested from articular surfaces of knee bones and fixed without screws or Kirschner wires) and/ or metal wedges (for peripheral defects) were used to fill the defects. Clinical outcome was assessed pre- and post-operatively using Knee Society scores.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 6.3 (range, 2.3-13.2) years. The mean depth of tibial bone defects was 11.2 (range, 1-25) mm, whereas the mean width ratio of the bone defects was 36.5% (range, 16.4-76.9%). Mean extension and flexion (range of motion) improved from -12.5º and 113.4º to -5.1º and 115.6º, respectively. The mean Knee Society knee score improved from 35 (range, 21-59) to 85 (range, 49-95), whereas the mean Knee Society function score improved from 30 (range, 25-53) to 80 (range, 44-97) [p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test]. The cruciate retention prosthesis was used in 6 knees; the posterior stabilised prosthesis was used in 27 knees; and the constrained condylar knee prosthesis was used in 3 knees. No patient had any infection or implant loosening.

CONCLUSION

TKA achieved favourable outcome for RA patients with large tibial bone defects. The type of prosthesis used and the use of bone grafts and/ or metal wedges were based on the depth and width ratio of the bone defects.

Clinical results of Hi-tech Knee II total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid athritis: 5- to 12-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common form of treatment to relieve pain and improve function in cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Good clinical outcomes have been reported with a variety of TKA prostheses. The cementless Hi-Tech Knee II cruciate-retaining (CR)-type prosthesis, which has 6 fins at the anterior of the femoral component, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention, flat-on-flat surface component geometry, all-polyethylene patella, strong initial fixation by the center screw of the tibial base plate, 10 layers of titanium alloy fiber mesh, and direct compression molded ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), is appropriate for TKA in the Japanese knee.The present study was performed to evaluate the clinical results of primary TKA in RA using the cementless Hi-Tech Knee II CR-type prosthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed 32 consecutive primary TKAs using cementless Hi-Tech Knee II CR-type prosthesis in 31 RA patients. The average follow-up period was 8 years 3 months. Clinical evaluations were performed according to the American Knee Society (KS) system, knee score, function score, radiographic evaluation, and complications.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative maximum flexion angle was 115.6°, and the KS knee score and function score improved to 88 and 70 after surgery, respectively. Complications, such as infection, occurred in 1 patient and revision surgery was performed. There were no cases of loosening in this cohort, and prosthesis survival rate was 96.9% at 12 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that TKA using the cementless Hi-Tech Knee II CR-type prosthesis is a very effective form of treatment in RA patients at 5 to 12 years postoperatively. Further long-term follow-up studies are required to determine the ultimate utility of this type of prosthesis.

Scoring evaluation for histopathological features of synovium in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy

The present study was performed to evaluate the synovium in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents (anti-TNFalpha). Synovial tissue specimens were obtained during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 42 RA patients (12 men, 30 women). Twenty-one RA patients were given anti-TNFalpha agents (infliximab, n = 12; etanercept, n = 9), while the remaining 21 RA patients were given no such agents.The histopathological findings were compared between specimens from these groups using the histological scoring system reported by Rooney, which consists of six items:degree of synovial hyperplasia, fibrosis, number of blood vessels, perivascular lymphocyte infiltration, focal aggregates of lymphocytes, and diffuse infiltrates of lymphocytes.Clinical laboratory data including C-reactive protein(CRP), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), and disease activity scores including a 28-joint count (DAS28), disease duration, methotrexate (MTX) dose, and glucocorticoid dose were also assessed before surgery. There were no significant differences in total score between anti-TNFalpha and no anti-TNFalpha groups. However, significant differences were observed in scores of synoviocyte hyperplasia and perivascular infiltrates of lymphocytes between the groups. These results suggested that these agents have a suppressive effect on cell proliferation in the lining layer and on perivascular lymphocyte infiltration. However, further studies are necessary to elucidate the mechanisms of these effects.

Joint counts to assess rheumatoid arthritis for clinical research and usual clinical care: advantages and limitations

A joint examination is prerequisite to a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and quantitative counts of swollen and tender joints are the most specific of the 7 RA Core Data Set measures for patient assessment. Therefore, joint counts are weighted of greater importance than the other 5 Core Data Set measures in American College of Rheumatology response criteria and all RA indices in which it is included. Nonetheless, several limitations to the joint count have been recognized: (1) poor reproducibility with a requirement to be performed by the same observer at each visit; (2) likelihood to improve with placebo treatment as much or more than the other 5 RA Core Data Set measures; (3) similar or lower relative efficiencies than global and patient measures to document differences between active and control treatments in clinical trials; (4) improvement over 5 years while joint damage and functional disability may progress; (5) lower sensitivity in detecting inflammatory activity than ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Most visits to a rheumatologist do not include a formal quantitative joint count. Quantitative patient self-report data are as sensitive to change and as informative about prognosis and outcomes as joint counts. It may be suggested that a careful qualitative (nonquantitative) joint examination, supplemented by quantitative self-report questionnaire scores to interpret physical examination findings, may be adequate to monitor patients and document changes in status in busy clinical settings.

Long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recognized as a disease with a natural history of severe long-term outcomes, which appear to be improving at this time, as reported from many clinics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved outcomes of many long-term consequences of inflammation such as joint deformity, functional declines, work disability, and early death have been reported in recent years.

SUMMARY

Therapies for RA are assessed in randomized clinical trials and in clinical care primarily according to measures of inflammatory activity, which may change considerably over days, weeks, and months. In usual clinical care, long-term consequences of the disease, which often require years of observation, can also be assessed. Data in published reports of both clinical trials and clinical care continue to include only a minority of all patients with RA. Further efforts are needed to promote collection of quantitative data in all patients with RA, at all visits in all clinical settings, to facilitate 'tight control' and better outcomes for all patients with RA.

A combination of biochemical markers of cartilage and bone turnover, radiographic damage and body mass index to predict the progression of joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of biological, radiological and clinical parameters for the progression of radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). We analyzed the 145 patients with active RA for less than 5 years who were participating in the prospective 1-year randomized controlled trial of tocilizumab (SAMURAI trial) as a control arm treated with conventional DMARDs. Progression of joint damage was assessed by sequential radiographs read by two independent blinded X-ray readers and scored for bone erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN) using the van der Heijde-modified Sharp method. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased urinary levels of C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type II collagen (U-CTX-II), an increased urinary total pyridinoline/total deoxypyridinoline (U-PYD/DPD) ratio and low body mass index (BMI) at baseline were independently associated with a higher risk for progression of bone erosion. In addition to these three variables, the JSN score at baseline was also significantly associated with an increased risk of progression of the JSN score and total Sharp score. High baseline U-CTX-II levels, U-PYD/DPD ratio and JSN score and a low BMI are independent predictive markers for the radiographically evident joint damage in patients with RA treated with conventional DMARDs.

Contemporary treatment principles for early rheumatoid arthritis: a consensus statement

OBJECTIVE

RA has a substantial impact on both patients and healthcare systems. Our objective is to advance the understanding of modern management principles in light of recent evidence concerning the condition's diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

A group of practicing UK rheumatologists formulated contemporary management principles and clinical practice recommendations concerning both diagnosis and treatment. Areas of clinical uncertainty were documented, leading to research recommendations.

RESULTS

A fundamental concept governing treatment of RA is minimization of cumulative inflammation, referred to as the inflammation-time area under the curve (AUC). To achieve this, four core principles of management were identified: (i) detect and refer patients early, even if the diagnosis is uncertain: patients should be referred at the first suspicion of persistent inflammatory polyarthritis and rheumatology departments should provide rapid access to a diagnostic and prognostic service; (ii) treat RA immediately: optimizing outcomes with conventional DMARDs and biologics requires that effective treatment be started early-ideally within 3 months of symptom onset; (iii) tight control of inflammation in RA improves outcome: frequent assessments and an objective protocol should be used to make treatment changes that maintain low-disease activity/remission at an agreed target; (iv) consider the risk-benefit ratio and tailor treatment to each patient: differing patient, disease and drug characteristics require long-term monitoring of risks and benefits with adaptations of treatments to suit individual circumstances.

CONCLUSION

These principles focus on effective control of the inflammatory process in RA, but optimal uptake may require changes in service provision to accommodate appropriate care pathways.

Women, men, and rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments in the QUEST-RA study

Introduction

Gender as a predictor of outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evoked considerable interest over the decades. Historically, there is no consensus whether RA is worse in females or males. Recent reports suggest that females are less likely than males to achieve remission. Therefore, we aimed to study possible associations of gender and disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments of RA in a large multinational cross-sectional cohort of patients with RA called Quantitative Standard Monitoring of Patients with RA (QUEST-RA).

Methods

The cohort includes clinical and questionnaire data from patients who were seen in usual care, including 6,004 patients at 70 sites in 25 countries as of April 2008. Gender differences were analyzed for American College of Rheumatology Core Data Set measures of disease activity, DAS28 (disease activity score using 28 joint counts), fatigue, the presence of rheumatoid factor, nodules and erosions, and the current use of prednisone, methotrexate, and biologic agents.

Results

Women had poorer scores than men in all Core Data Set measures. The mean values for females and males were swollen joint count-28 (SJC28) of 4.5 versus 3.8, tender joint count-28 of 6.9 versus 5.4, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 30 versus 26, Health Assessment Questionnaire of 1.1 versus 0.8, visual analog scales for physician global estimate of 3.0 versus 2.5, pain of 4.3 versus 3.6, patient global status of 4.2 versus 3.7, DAS28 of 4.3 versus 3.8, and fatigue of 4.6 versus 3.7 (P < 0.001). However, effect sizes were small-medium and smallest (0.13) for SJC28. Among patients who had no or minimal disease activity (0 to 1) on SJC28, women had statistically significantly higher mean values compared with men in all other disease activity measures (P < 0.001) and met DAS28 remission less often than men. Rheumatoid factor was equally prevalent among genders. Men had nodules more often than women. Women had erosions more often than men, but the statistical significance was marginal. Similar proportions of females and males were taking different therapies.

Conclusions

In this large multinational cohort, RA disease activity measures appear to be worse in women than in men. However, most of the gender differences in RA disease activity may originate from the measures of disease activity rather than from RA disease activity itself.

Efficacy of prednisone 1-4 mg/day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled withdrawal clinical trial

Objective:

A randomised double-blind placebo controlled withdrawal clinical trial of prednisone versus placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treated in usual clinical care with 1–4 mg/day prednisone, withdrawn to the same dose of 1 mg prednisone or identical placebo tablets.

Methods:

All patients were from one academic setting and all trial visits were conducted in usual clinical care. Patients were taking stable doses of 1–4 mg prednisone with stable clinical status, documented quantitatively by patient questionnaire scores. The protocol included three phases: (1) equivalence: 1–4 study prednisone 1 mg tablets taken for 12 weeks to ascertain their efficacy compared with the patient’s usual tablets before randomisation; (2) transfer: substitution of a 1 mg prednisone or identical placebo tablet every 4 weeks (over 0–12 weeks) to the same number as baseline prednisone; (3) comparison: observation over 24 subsequent weeks taking the same number of either placebo or prednisone tablets as at baseline. The primary outcome was withdrawal due to patient-reported lack of efficacy versus continuation in the trial for 24 weeks.

Results:

Thirty-one patients were randomised, 15 to prednisone and 16 to placebo, with three administrative discontinuations. In “intent-to-treat” analyses, 3/15 prednisone and 11/16 placebo participants withdrew (p = 0.03). Among participants eligible for the primary outcome, 3/13 prednisone and 11/15 placebo participants withdrew for lack of efficacy (p = 0.02). No meaningful adverse events were reported, as anticipated.

Conclusion:

Efficacy of 1–4 mg prednisone was documented. Evidence of statistically significant differences with only 31 patients may suggest a robust treatment effect.

The need for prognosticators in rheumatoid arthritis. Biological and clinical markers: where are we now?

Rheumatoid arthritis is a heterogeneous disease with respect to clinical manifestations, serologic abnormalities, joint damage and functional impairment. Predicting outcome in a reliable way to allow for strategic therapeutic decision-making as well as for prediction of the response to the various therapeutic modalities available today, especially biological agents, would provide means for optimization of care. In the present article, the current information on biological and clinical markers related to disease activity and joint damage as well as for predictive purposes is reviewed. It will be shown that the relationship of many biomarkers with disease characteristics is confounded by factors unrelated to the disease, and that only few biomarkers exist with some predictive value. Moreover, clinical markers appear of equal value as biomarkers for this purpose, although they likewise have limited capacity in these regards. The analysis suggests the search for better markers to predict outcomes and therapeutic responsiveness in rheumatoid arthritis needs to be intensified.

Retrospective clinical study on the notable efficacy and related factors of infliximab therapy in a rheumatoid arthritis management group in Japan: one-year outcome of joint destruction (RECONFIRM-2J)

The anti-TNF-alpha chimeric monoclonal antibody infliximab is the first biologic to be approved for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan, and post-marketing surveillance of all of the Japanese cases treated with infliximab has been conducted to explore the safety of infliximab therapy. In addition, a retrospective clinical study on the notable efficacy and related factors of infliximab therapy in an RA management group in Japan (RECONFIRM and RECONFIRM-2) has demonstrated clinical responses. However, information on the effect of infliximab on joint destruction in Japanese RA patients remains insufficient. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed X-ray data from 67 patients in whom both hand and foot X-rays at baseline and at 54 weeks had been available among the 410 cases in the RECONFIRM-2 study. By scoring the X-rays according to the modified van der Heijde (vdH)-Sharp method, we found that the total vdH-Sharp score in the RA patients before infliximab therapy was 104.40+/-87.34 and the yearly progression was 21.33, indicating relatively rapid progression. After infliximab therapy for 54 weeks, the total vdH-Sharp score at 54 weeks was 104.37+/-86.87 and the estimated yearly progression was -0.03, indicating the almost complete inhibition of progression. The RECONFIRM-2J study confirmed the significant ability of infliximab to halt joint destruction in Japanese RA patients, and showed that joint destruction was significantly associated with disease activity and the dose of MTX in the patients with moderate and advanced disease durations, respectively, before infliximab therapy.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective on the use of antirheumatic drugs

Modern therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is based on knowledge of the severity of the natural history of the disease. RA patients are approached with early and aggressive treatment strategies, methotrexate as an anchor drug, biological targeted therapies in those with inadequate response to methotrexate, and “tight control,” aiming for remission and low disease activity according to quantitative monitoring. This chapter presents a rationale for current treatment strategies for RA with antirheumatic drugs, a review of published reports concerning treatments in clinical cohorts outside of clinical trials, and current treatments at 61 sites in 21 countries in the QUEST-RA database.

Quantitative measures of rheumatic diseases for clinical research versus standard clinical care: differences, advantages and limitations

No single measure can serve as a 'gold standard' for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of patients with rheumatic diseases. Therefore, pooled indices of several measures have been developed for patient assessment. Quantitative measures and indices in rheumatology have been used primarily in clinical trials and other clinical research, but not in standard clinical care. Indeed, most standard rheumatology care is conducted without quantitative data other than laboratory tests, which often are uninformative. Some measures used in research have been adapted for standard care. The classical 66/68-joint count with graded scoring for swelling, tenderness, pain on motion, limited motion, and deformity has been shortened for clinical care to a 28-joint count, scored only as 'Yes' or 'No' for swelling or tenderness. Patient questionnaires designed for clinical research can be lengthy, with complex scoring, so that information is not available to help guide clinical decisions. By contrast, patient questionnaires designed for standard care, such as a simple one-page, multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), are short, save time, are easily scored, and are useful in all rheumatic diseases to monitor patient status at each visit and document changes over long periods. More attention to measures for use in standard care could improve care and outcomes for patients with rheumatic diseases.

Recommendations of the French Society for Rheumatology. TNFalpha antagonist therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To develop recommendations for TNFalpha-antagonist therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) seen in everyday practice, under the aegis of the French Society for Rheumatology.

METHOD

We used the methods recommended by the French Agency for Healthcare Accreditation and Evaluation, the AGREE collaboration, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR). The recommendations focus on patient selection, monitoring, and treatment adjustments.

RESULTS

Criteria for selecting patients eligible for TNFalpha-antagonist treatment of RA include: 1) a definitive diagnosis of RA; 2) disease activity for longer than 1 month, including presence of objective signs of inflammation; or radiographic progression; 3) previous failure of methotrexate in the highest tolerated dosage or of another disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with contraindications to methotrexate; 4) absence of contraindications to TNFalpha-antagonist therapy. When starting TNFalpha-antagonist therapy 1) a thorough baseline evaluation should be conducted; 2) any of the three available agents can be used, as no differences in efficacy have been identified in patient populations; 3) concomitant methotrexate therapy is recommended regardless of the TNFalpha antagonist used; and 4) patients should receive standardized follow-up at regular intervals. Treatment adjustments should be based on the following: 1) the treatment objective is achievement of a EULAR response; 2) when such a response is not achieved, the dosage or dosing interval can be changed, or the patient can be switched to another TNFalpha antagonist; 3) in patients who experience intolerance to a TNFalpha antagonist, another TNFalpha antagonist may be tried, depending on the nature of the adverse event; 4) occurrence of a remission should lead to a reduction in symptomatic medications, most notably glucocorticoids where used; in the event of a prolonged remission, either the TNFalpha antagonist or the concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drug may be reduced.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations are intended to help physicians use TNFalpha antagonists in their everyday practice with RA patients. They do not constitute regulations.

Predictors of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis treated with high-dose methotrexate with or without concomitant infliximab: Results from the ASPIRE trial

OBJECTIVE

To identify disease characteristics leading to progression of joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with methotrexate (MTX) versus those treated with infliximab plus MTX.

METHODS

Patients who had not previously been treated with MTX with active RA were randomly assigned to receive escalating doses of MTX up to 20 mg/week plus placebo or infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter through week 46. Radiographic joint damage was assessed using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS). The relationship between disease activity measures at baseline and week 14, as well as those averaged over time, were examined in relation to the change in SHS from baseline through week 54.

RESULTS

C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and swollen joint count were associated with greater joint damage progression in the MTX-only group, while none of these parameters was associated with progression in the infliximab plus MTX group. Mean changes in SHS among patients in the highest CRP (> or = 3 mg/dl) and ESR (> or = 52 mm/hour) tertiles in the MTX-only group were 5.62 and 5.89, respectively, compared with 0.73 and 1.12 in the infliximab plus MTX group (P < 0.001). Patients with greater joint damage at baseline (SHS > or = 10.5) showed less progression with infliximab plus MTX compared with MTX alone (-0.39 versus 4.11; P < 0.001). Patients receiving MTX alone who had persistently active disease at week 14 showed greater radiographic progression of joint damage than those taking MTX plus infliximab.

CONCLUSION

High CRP level, high ESR, or persistent disease activity was associated with greater radiographic progression in the group taking MTX alone, while little radiographic progression was seen in patients receiving both MTX and infliximab, regardless of the abnormal levels of these traditional predictors.

Patients seen for standard rheumatoid arthritis care have significantly better articular, radiographic, laboratory, and functional status in 2000 than in 1985

OBJECTIVE

A comprehensive quantitative analysis of measures of disease activity and joint damage has not been available to compare patients in different eras in the same clinical setting. This study was undertaken to determine whether the clinical status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has improved on average in recent years.

METHODS

A quantitative cross-sectional evaluation, which included joint count, radiographic, laboratory, patient questionnaire, and physical function measures, and therapies, was performed in 125 consecutive RA patients seen from 1984 through 1986 ("1985 cohort"). A virtually identical assessment was performed in 150 patients seen from 1999 through 2001 ("2000 cohort"), in the same weekly academic clinic. Measures were compared using descriptive statistics and a median regression model, adjusted for age, duration of disease, level of formal education, and rheumatoid factor.

RESULTS

Patients in 1985 had significantly poorer status compared with those in 2000: median 12 versus 5 swollen joints, Larsen radiographic score 20 versus 3, erythrocyte sedimentation rate 33 mm/hour versus 20, and modified Health Assessment Questionnaire 1.0 versus 0.4 (P < 0.019). Severe Disease Activity Scores >5.1 were seen in 69% of 1985 patients, compared with 30% in 2000. Methotrexate was taken by 10% of patients in 1985, versus 76% in 2000. The proportion of patients not taking any disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs was 66% in 1985 versus 13% in 2000.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving standard care for RA in this setting had significantly better status, including radiographic scores, in 2000 than in 1985, associated with aggressive treatment strategies, prior to the introduction of biologic agents.

Structural evaluation in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: development of recommendations for clinical practice based on published evidence and expert opinion

OBJECTIVES

To develop French evidence-based recommendations for the structural evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in everyday practice.

METHODS

A scientific committee selected 10 questions using the Delphi consensus procedure. Evidence-based responses to each question were sought by searching the PubMed and Ovid databases and the abstract databases for the 2002, 2003, and 2004 annual meetings of the French Society for Rheumatology, the EULAR, and the American College of Rheumatology. The following indexing terms were used: rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis, patient, diagnostic imaging, radiography, joint, erosion, and joint space width. All articles published in French or English prior to May 2004 were identified. The evidence from these articles was reported to a panel of 77 rheumatologists working in hospital or office practice. The panel developed detailed recommendations, filling gaps in evidence with their expert opinion. The strength of each recommendation was determined.

RESULTS

The 10 questions probed the structural evaluation of RA by plain radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography, both for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. The literature search retrieved 673 publications, of which 166 were selected and reviewed. The panel developed 10 recommendations, one for each question, which were accepted by consensus.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations relative to the diagnosis or monitoring of structural involvement in patients with RA in everyday practice were developed. They should help to improve practice uniformity and, ultimately, to improve the management of RA.

Clinical trials in rheumatic diseases: designs and limitations

Randomized controlled clinical trials provide the best method to distinguish a drug from placebo without the inevitable selection biases that are seen in standard clinical care. This article reviews designs and limitations of clinical trials that are used in rheumatic diseases. The primary design in clinical trials is a parallel, in which patients are randomized in parallel to different therapies at different dosages or placebo. In recent years, other designs have been used increasingly, including "step-up," "step-down," and "cross-over" designs. Limitations of clinical trials in chronic diseases include a short time frame versus the long duration of disease, inclusion and exclusion criteria, use of surrogate markers that may not represent clinically relevant markers, statistical significance does not necessarily indicate clinical significance necessarily, and the fact that a control group does not assure the absence of bias. Therefore, long-term databases are needed to supplement clinical trials in analyzing results of therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Should contemporary rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials be more like standard patient care and vice versa?

The information used by rheumatologists when delivering care to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is derived mainly from two sources: randomised controlled clinical trials and experience in clinical care. However, these two sources differ significantly because (a) the extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria result in clinical trial participants being recruited from only a minority of patients seen in standard clinical care; (b) assessments in clinical trials are conducted according to standard quantitative measures and indices, while standard clinical care of most patients with RA is generally conducted empirically, without collection of any quantitative data other than laboratory tests to estimate prognosis and document change in status; and (c) although baseline databases of various clinical trials (and observational studies) are 60-90% identical in content, they are not standardised and therefore not amenable to direct comparisons. Strategies to promote similarities between clinical trials and standard clinical care in patients with RA may include: more generalised inclusion criteria; incorporation of quantitative measurement into standard care, easily accomplished by asking each patient to complete a simple questionnaire at each visit to a rheumatologist; and consensus among rheumatologists for databases with standard content and format in clinical care and research involving patients with RA.

Quantitative measures and indices to assess rheumatoid arthritis in clinical trials and clinical care

Modern medical care has been advanced, in large part, by quantitative measures that provide single, easily-assessed end points for clinical trials, clinical research, or clinical care (eg, blood pressure, serum cholesterol). In rheumatoid arthritis, several types of quantitative measures are used to assess patient status, including formal joint counts; radiographic scores; laboratory tests; patient self-report questionnaire measures of physical function, pain, global status, morning stiffness, and fatigue; as well as physical measures of functional status. Each of these measures is effective to document changes of status with treatment in groups of patients; however, no single measure can serve as a "gold standard" to document changes in each individual patient. Therefore, the measures have been combined into pooled indices that can be applied to individual patients in clinical research and clinical care.

The natural history and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis: association of radiographic outcome with process variables, joint motion and immune proteins

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of the present study were: 1) to investigate how the long-term course of outcome and inflammatory variables could be described in individual patients and suitably summarized in groups of patients; 2) to investigate the associations between outcome and inflammatory variables on the basis of the defined summary measures; and 3) to investigate new prognostic aspects of RA by means of frozen sera and DNA specimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the period 1966-78, 685 Danish Caucasian patients with RA, classified according to the 1958 American Rheumatism Association (ARA) criteria, were admitted to the Department of Rheumatology of Aarhus University Hospital. For scientific purposes all patients went through the same examination programme, including biochemical variables, clinical evaluation of 68 diarthrodial joints, and radiographic evaluation of 46 diarthrodial joints. Since 1987, data from these patients have been organized in a database. The data are arranged according to onset of disease. This thesis is based on about 600,000 data-points from 257 patients.

RESULTS

The thesis is based on six studies. The first study shows that early symptomatic improvement of RA during gold treatment was stable over several years, but when evaluated radiographically, the condition continued to deteriorate. In the second study, six main types of radiographic progression were identified: (a) a rare type with no radiographic progression at all (<1%); (b) a type with a slow or moderate onset, but an increasing progression rate (exponential growth type) (9%); (c) a linear type (30%); (d) a type with a moderate to fast onset, and a stable progression rate (the square root type) (11%); (e) a type with a fast onset, but a later decreasing progression rate (the first order kinetics type) (30%) and (f) a type characterized by slow onset, then acceleration and later deceleration (the sigmoid type) (20%). The fact that there was a systematic progression was used to define a system of radiographic events, which could be used as outcome measures in prediction models of the long-term course of RA. The third study shows that low serum levels of the complement-activating serum lectin, mannan (mannose) binding protein (lectin) (MBP = MBL), are associated with a higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p=0.006), joint swelling score (JS score) (p=0.019), limitation of joint motion score (LM score) (p=0.027), and annual increase in radiographic destruction score (R score) (p=0.053). The fourth study demonstrated a highly significant association between summary measures of inflammatory variables and radiographic outcome, as defined in the second study, indicating that the degree of inflammation is important for the development of destructive joint damage in RA. The fifth study showed that MBL-insufficient patients (two defective structural MBL alleles, or one defective allele combined with a low-expression variant of the normal allele) had a relative risk of a severe radiographic event of 3.1 compared with the MBL competent group (p<0.0001). The sixth study showed that the relative risk (RR) of early interleukin (IL)-1alpha auto-antibodies (aAb) positive patients developing serious radiographic joint destruction was significantly lower than for IL-1alpha aAb-negative patients, RR=0.29 (p=0.04). In rheumatoid factor (RF) positive patients RR was only 0.18 (p=0.02). Patients who seroconverted >2 years after the onset of RA showed the most aggressive development of joint erosion, with RR of serious radiographic joint destruction of 2.56 (p=0.048). Other factors investigated in subgroups of the patients were HLA-DR4, chemokine receptor 5 (CCR 5) genotypes. IL-6 aAb, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) aAb, and interferon (IFN)-gamma aAb. About 80% of the patients were HLA-DR4 positive, indicating the importance of HLA-DR4 as a predisposing factor for RA. There was no association between IL-6 aAb and radiographic outcome, or CCR5 genotypes and radiographic outcome. VEGF aAb and IFN-gamma aAb were quantitatively unimportant.

CONCLUSION

In spite of a general improvement in single measures of inflammatory variables, and a general deterioration in radiographic outcome of RA, there is a highly significant association between summary measures of inflammatory variables and radiographic outcome. The progression of radiographic damage in RA follows mathematical patterns. A new method of evaluating the long-term radiographic outcome by means of Kaplan-Meier plots is demonstrated. It is shown that MBL and IL-1alpha aAb are predictors of the prognosis of RA and may play important roles in the pathogenesis of RA.

Quantitative measures for assessing rheumatoid arthritis in clinical trials and clinical care

There is no single 'gold standard' quantitative measure to assess and monitor the clinical status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Therefore, a variety of measures have been used in clinical research and clinical care, including laboratory tests, radiographic scores, formal joint counts, physical measures of functional status, global measures and patient self-report questionnaires. These measures may address disease activity, joint damage, both activity and damage, or long-term outcomes. Measures of disease activity, such as joint swelling, are reversible and are emphasized in clinical trials. However, activity measures may be improved over 5 years while measures of damage, such as radiographic score, indicate disease progression. Two quantitative indices which are widely used in clinical trials are the (1) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Data Set, which includes swollen joint count, tender joint count, physician assessment of global status, acute-phase reactant-erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein, functional status, pain, patient estimate of global status, a radiograph in studies over 1 year or longer, and (2) the disease activity score(DAs), which includes a swollen joint count, tender joint count, acute-phase reactant, and patient assessment of global status. Randomized controlled clinical trials provide the optimal method to evaluate new therapies, by comparing a therapy with a placebo or another therapy without selecting patients for specific therapies. However, randomized trials in chronic diseases have important limitations, including a relatively short observation period, patient selection for inclusion and exclusion criteria, inflexible dosage schedules, influence of the design on results despite a control group, emphasis on group data while ignoring individual variation in treatment responses, non-standardized interpretation of adverse effects, and others. Therefore, clinical trials in RA must be supplemented by long-term observational studies to assess results of therapy in regard to long-term outcomes such as work disability, joint replacement surgery and premature mortality. The most simple and effective method of collecting important long-term data from patients in routine clinical care is through patient self-report questionnaires.

Inter- and intrareader variability in the interpretation of two radiographic classification systems for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inter- and intrareader variability for interpretation of a modified Larsen's radiographic classification system for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) focused on osteochondral lesions and a conventional Larsen's classification system, compared to a reference MR scoring system of corresponding images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five radiographs of 60 children with JRA, performed within a short interval of time from the MR examinations, were independently evaluated by three experienced radiologists, three diagnostic imaging residents and three rheumatologists, in two separate sessions, according to the two different classification methods, blinded to the corresponding MR images.

RESULTS

The inter- and intrareader concordance rates between the two radiographic classification systems and the MR-related radiographs were respectively poor and poor/moderate. The interobserver range of weighted kappa values for the conventional and the modified Larsen's system respectively was 0.25-0.37 vs 0.19-0.39 for radiologists, 0.25-0.37 vs 0.18-0.30 for residents and 0.19-0.51 vs 0.17-0.29 for rheumatologists. The intrareader rate ranged from 0.17-0.55 for radiologists, 0.2-0.56 for residents, and 0.14-0.59 for rheumatologists.

CONCLUSION

Although the proposal of a new radiographic classification system for JRA focused on osteochondral abnormalities sounds promising, the low inter- and intrareader concordance rates with an MR-related radiographic system makes the clinical applicability of such a radiographic system less suitable.

Cutaneous vasculitis

Vasculitis can range in severity from a self-limited single-organ disorder to a life-threatening disease with the prospect of multiple-organ failure. This condition presents many challenges to the physician, including classification and diagnosis, appropriate laboratory workup, treatment, and the need for careful follow-up. The physician must not only be able to recognize vasculitis but also be able to provide a specific diagnosis (if possible) as well as recognize and treat any underlying etiologic condition. Most diagnostic criteria are based on the size of vessel involvement, which often correlates with specific dermatologic findings. This may allow the dermatologist to provide an initial diagnosis and direct the medical evaluation. This article reviews the classification and diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitic syndromes and current treatment options; it also presents a comprehensive approach to diagnosing and treating the patient with suspected cutaneous vasculitis. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:311-40.)

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the completion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the classification and clinical features of the various forms of cutaneous vasculitis. They should also have a rational approach to diagnosing and treating a patient with vasculitis.

The mechanical joint score: a new clinical index of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the mechanical joint score (MJS) in terms of its reliability between observers and over time, its ease of use and its relationship with conventional measures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, severity and functional outcome.

METHODS

The MJS was evaluated in 103 patients with reference to the following joints: total proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, total metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, wrists, elbows, shoulders, hips, knees, ankles and total metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints. The score was based on the appearance of the joints on a scale of 0-3, 0 representing no abnormality and 3 severe abnormality or previous surgery. The MJS was evaluated in terms of its intra- and inter-observer variability and its content, construct and criterion validities. A subset of 29 patients were re-evaluated after 5 yr to examine change in MJS over time.

RESULTS

The MJS performed well in terms of inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. The MJS showed strong correlation with the Larsen X-ray score of hands and feet (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.74) and with the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.56) and only weak correlation with indices of disease activity, such as the Ritchie index and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The MJS showed highly significant positive change over time.

CONCLUSION

The MJS is a reliable clinical index of joint damage and may be a useful new outcome measure in RA.