Detection and identification of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in a large and consecutive cohort of serum samples referred for ANA testing

The Frequency of Immunofluorescence Antinuclear Antibody Patterns and Extractable Nuclear Antigen: Experience From a Large Laboratory in Pakistan

Background Autoimmune disorders have shown an increasing incidence in the last few years. The systemic response to the disorder is characterized by the expression of antinuclear antibody (ANA), which serves as the serological hallmark of autoimmunity. Its presence may indicate either a systemic autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), scleroderma, and polymyositis/dermatomyositis or an organ-specific condition such as autoimmune thyroiditis and hepatitis. The systemic response may vary from one individual to another in each population. Several specific autoantibodies are also found to be associated with specific rheumatic diseases. Aim We aim to report the frequency of ANA positivity, ANA immunofluorescence patterns, and the presence of extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) among the general Pakistani population from one of the largest laboratories in Pakistan. Material and methods A total of 1,966 blood samples from a random Pakistani population were included, who were referred by their physicians with suspicion of autoimmune disease. These blood samples were subjected to ANA testing by indirect immunofluorescence method, and subsequently, positive samples were further analyzed for ENA detection in the Section of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. An ANA titer of ≥1:80 was taken as positive. ANA was divided into subgroups based on titer: negative, weakly positive (titer of 1:80 or 1:160), moderately positive (titer of 1:320 or 1:640), and strongly positive (titer of ≥1:1280). Further, the frequency of ANA in male and female participants was studied in different age groups (2 to <10, 10 to <20, 20 to <30, 30 to <40, 40 to <50, 50 to <60, 60 to <70, 70 to <80, and 80+ years). Results This study included 1,966 participants, out of which 1,100 (55%) were ANA-positive at a titer of ≥1:80. Out of these ANA positives, the proportion of weakly positive (titer of 1:80 or 1:160), moderately positive (titer of 1:320 or 1:640), and strongly positive (titer of ≥1:1280) were 48.7%, 2.6%, and 4.2%, respectively. The ages ranged from two to 91 years, with a mean age of 43.64 ± 17.4 years. Females (75.5%) showed predominance over males (24.5%) in all age groups, with a ratio of 3:1. The age group in which most ANA positivity was found was 30 to <40 years. Among 1,100 ANA-positive sera, 383 (34.8%) participants tested positive for at least one out of 15 ENA. The most frequent autoantibodies noticed were anti-recombinant Ro52 (Ro52) (19.8%), anti-Sjogren's syndrome type A (SSA) (17.2%), and anti-ribonucleoprotein (RNP) (13.3%). The most prevalent ANA patterns were nuclear homogeneous (27.7%), followed by nuclear speckled (26.5%). Conclusion The frequency of ANA positivity is high in the Pakistani population and differs in different sex and age groups.

The influence of demography and referral medical specialty on the detection of autoantibodies to HEP-2 cells in a large sample of patients

Background

The prevalence of anti-cell autoantibodies detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2-IIFA) increases with age and is higher in female sex. The number of medical specialties that use HEp-2-IIFA in the investigation of autoimmune diseases has increased lately. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and patterns of autoantibodies on HEp-2-IIFA according to demographics variables and referring medical specialties.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the HEp-2-IIFA carried out between January and June of 2017 was performed. The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibodies Patterns (ICAP) and the Brazilian Consensus on Autoantibodies were used for patterns definition on visual reading of the slides. Anti-cell (AC) codes from ICAP and Brazilian AC codes (BAC) were used for patterns classification.

Results

From 54,990 samples referred for HEp-2-IIF testing, 20.9% were positive at titer ≥ 1/80. HEp-2-IIFA positivity in females and males was 24% and 12%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The proportion of positive results in the 4 age groups analyzed: 0–19, 20–39, 40–59, and ≥ 60 years was 23.3, 20.2, 20.1, and 22.8%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Considering all positive sera (n = 11,478), AC-4 nuclear fine speckled (37.7%), AC-2 nuclear dense fine speckled (21.3%), BAC-3 nuclear quasi-homogeneous (10%) and mixed/composite patterns (8.8%) were the most prevalent patterns. The specialties that most requested HEp-2-IIFA were general practitioner (20.1%), dermatology (15%), gynecology (9.9%), rheumatology (8.5%), and cardiology (5.8%). HEp-2-IIFA positivity was higher in patients referred by rheumatologists (35.7% vs. 19.6%) (p < 0.0001). Moderate (46.4%) and high (10.8%) titers were more observed in patients referred by rheumatologists (p < 0.0001). We observed a high proportion of mixed and cytoplasmic patterns in samples referred by oncologists and a high proportion of BAC-3 (nuclear quasi-homogeneous) pattern in samples referred by pneumologists.

Conclusions

One-fifth of the patients studied were HEp-2-IIFA-positive. The age groups with more positive results were 0–19 and ≥ 60 years. AC-4, AC-2, BAC-3 and mixed/composite patterns were the most frequent patterns observed. Rheumatologists requested only 8.5% of HEp-2-IIFA. Positive results and moderate to high titers of autoantibodies were more frequent in patients referred by rheumatologists.

Anti-double stranded DNA antibodies: A rational diagnostic approach in limited resource settings

Context

Anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid antibodies (dsDNA Abs) are highly specific markers of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Multiple methods are employed for their detection in routine diagnostics.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate a diagnostic approach for anti-dsDNA Abs using DNA-ELISA and Crithidia luciliae fluorescence test (CLIFT), in combination with antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening.

Methods

We enrolled 113 patients—53 with SLE, 50 with other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (OSARD), and 10 with non-autoimmune clinical conditions (NAICC).

Patients’ samples were tested for anti-dsDNA Abs using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and CLIFT, combined to ANA screening by indirect immunofluorescence assay (ANA-IIFA).

Results

The mean age of patients was 39.94 ± 15 years (ranges: 11–85 years). Overall, specimens from 77.3%, 11.7%, and 20% of patients with SLE, OSARD and NAICC respectively were ELISA-positive; and those from 54.7% to 4% of patients with SLE and OSARD, respectively, were CLIFT-positive. CLIFT positivity was significantly associated with high ELISA titers (p = 0.002) and homogeneous ANA-IIF pattern (p = 0.0002).

Conclusion

For better clinical relevance of anti-dsDNA antibodies, we suggest a combined detection strategy based on ELISA, CLIFT and ANA-IIFA, considering the clinical criteria of SLE.

•

Anti-dsDNA Abs represent an excellent indicator of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity and valuable diagnostic biomarker.

•

We tested 103 autoimmune disease cases and 10 non-autoimmune condition cases for anti-dsDNA Abs using DNA and CLIFT, in combination with ANA-IIF screening.

•

CLIFT positivity was significantly associated with high DNA-ELISA titers (p = 0.002) and homogeneous ANA-IIF pattern (p = 0.0002).

•

High DNA-ELISA titers with a positive CLIFT are clinically relevant for the diagnosis of SLE, especially in the presence of a homogeneous ANA-IIF pattern.

Exosome circRNAs and ceRNA network profiles in different ANA sera

Increasing evidences show that circRNAs are associated with some autoimmunity diseases either as a biomarker or therapeutic target. Exosomes containing nucleic acids and proteins are found in sera of series diseases and could serve as either diagnostic or therapeutic target. ANA serves as first common diagnostic test for autoimmunity disease, different ANA staining reflecting different types of autoimmunity disease. Till now, whether different ANA sera exosomes express different circRNAs and relevant ceRNA networks are still shortage of investigation. This study analyzed circRNAs, miRNAs, and their interaction networks in different ANA sera exosomes by high-throughput sequencing. It found no significant difference of total circRNAs and miRNAs amount across different ANA sera exosomes. However, significant differences were found of circRNAs, miRNA constituents, function analysis by KEGG and GO, and their ceRNA networks including miRNA-circRNA and miRNA-mRNA among different ANA sera exosomes, suggesting sera exosome circRNAs as either biomarker or mechanism of autoimmunity diseases.

Assessment of ideal serum dilution for screening of antinuclear antibodies by an indirect immunofluorescence method in diagnosis of autoimmune disorders

BACKGROUND

Time and cost constraints lead to majority of clinical laboratories deviating away from an ideal practice of checking for antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) at multiple dilutions. Usage of screening dilution of 1:40 recommended by most manufacturers of commercial ANA kits results in numerous false positive-tests and misdiagnosis of connective tissue disorders (CTDs). We sought to study the ideal screening dilution for ANA by IIF for a diagnosis of ANA-related CTDs.

METHODS

Serum samples of patients with ANA-related conditions (n = 233) and healthy controls (n = 154) were evaluated by IIF using Immuno Concepts Hep-2000 ® ANA kits at dilutions from 1:40 to 1:640. Accuracy for diagnosis of CTDs for each serum dilution was assessed by receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) positivity was observed in 19.5%, 10.4%, 4.55%, 0.65%, and 0% of healthy controls at dilutions of 1:40, 1:80, 1:160, 1:320, and 1:640, respectively. ANA positivity at 1:40 dilution was observed among 26.4% cases with mimics of CTDs. Prevalence of ANA positivity in ANA-related CTDs was 97.3%, 96.4%, 89.3%, 83.9%, and 71.4% at dilutions of 1:40, 1:80, 1:160, 1:320, and 1:640, respectively. ROC analysis revealed best test performance for distinction between healthy and ANA-related CTD populations at a serum dilution of 1 in 80.

CONCLUSIONS

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) positivity at low titers (1:40) is highly prevalent in healthy population (19.5%) as well as amongst mimics of CTD (26.4%). Our study suggests a higher screening dilution of 1:80 for ANA by IIF for diagnosis of CTD maybe better. Combination of 1:80 and 1:160 dilutions provides optimum sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of ANA-related disorders.

Antinuclear Antibody Profiling in Patients of a Tertiary Care Centre in Central India

The incidence of autoimmune disorders that includes the connective tissue diseases has seen a rise in India in recent times. Antinuclear antibodies, the telltale sign of systemic autoimmune response, thus can be used as a screening tool and also to support the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disease. The present retrospective cross- sectional analysis aimed to study the antinuclear antibodies profile (patterns and specific antibody reactivity) amongst suspected cases of auto-immune disorders at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The study retrieved and reviewed reports of 644 patients sent for ANA testing by indirect immunofluorescence assay over a period of 1 year by different specialty departments. Positive samples were further processed for anti-ds-DNA antibody and antibodies to extractable nuclear antigen. Data collected was statistically analysed. ANA pattern positivity was observed in 31% of cases and a positive antibody reactivity was seen in 66% of them. Female predominance (82%) was noted in both pattern positivity and antibody reactivity. High levels of pattern positivity and antibody reactivity was found in the young adults (45.9%). Amongst the ANA patterns, the nuclear homogenous pattern was found the commonest. The common antibodies associated with this pattern were anti-dsDNA and U1 Sm/RNP antibodies. A stronger fluorescence intensity on initial screening showed a higher confirmation rate for specific antibodies on immunoassay. High occurrence of positive ANA patterns in autoimmune disorders suggests its utilization as a screening tool for them and would also play an adjuvant to the diagnosis. Early knowledge about future autoimmunity will earn better prognostic achievements through better treatment interventions.

A Hospital-Based Insight into the Antinuclear Antibody Patterns in Autoimmune Disorders

Background  The incidence of autoimmune disorders has seen a rise in India in recent times. The symptoms and signs of these conditions are caused by a systemic autoimmune response, essentially characterized by the expression of the antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Presence of ANA in serum of patient could be the prime evidence of an autoimmune disorder.

Aim  This study aimed to determine the antibody patterns and assess the clinical significance of ANA in patients of a teaching tertiary care hospital of central India.

Material and Methods  This retrospective cross-sectional data analysis study retrieved 538 reports of individuals, who were prescribed the ANA test by indirect immunofluorescence assay over a period of 11 months, from the archives of the Department of Biochemistry. For continuous data, student t -test was used while Chi-square and Fisher exact was conducted for categorical data. A p value less than 0.05 were taken as significant.

Results  Out of the 538 patients investigated for ANA testing by indirect immunofluorescence assay, 33% were positive, among which 74% were female, and majority belonged to the young adult age group. The most common pattern identified was nuclear, subpattern nuclear speckled.

Conclusion  A high-ANA pattern positivity could be related to a high-autoimmunity prevalence in this region, and also promotes its use as a tool of evidence of suspected autoimmune disorders.

Association between antinuclear antibodies (ANA) patterns and extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) in HEp-2 cells in patients with autoimmune diseases in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) are instrumental biomarkers crucial in the detection of autoimmune disorders (AID) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjogren syndrome, etc.. In the present study, an assessment of the most frequent ANA patterns associated with most detectable ENA that could be used as efficient prognostic markers in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases was conducted. Data was retrospectively analyzed from AID patients, retrieved from the medical records of King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, KSA, from January 2016 to October 2018 who underwent ANA immunofluorescence of HEp-2 cells and their ENA detection was studied. Of the 453 total patients, 39/55 AID males (71%) and 332/398 AID females (83.4%) exhibited ANA positivity. The most common pattern was speckled S-ANA (32.4%) in females and homogenous H-ANA pattern (25.4%) in males. The histones were found at higher frequency in different ANA patterns. anti-Sjogren syndrome related antigen A (SSA), anti-ribonucleoprotein antibody (RNP-Sm), and histones were observed to be associated with homogenous and speckled nuclear patterns. Frequencies of ENA in all ANA patterns were found significant at p < 0.05 in males and p < 0.001 in females. Spearman's rank correlation of ENA within and among the ANA patterns was non-significant. SSA was significantly correlated with RNP-Sm and Sm at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. The extractable nuclear antigens SSA, RNP-Sm, and histones were found associated with the S-ANA and H-ANA patterns. These correlations are of relevance for the accurate diagnosis of autoimmune diseases.

Investigation and analysis of HEp 2 indirect immunofluorescence titers and patterns in various liver diseases

INTRODUCTION

Antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing using indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) is a common and economical method which contributes to detect systemic autoimmune diseases (SARD) and autoimmune liver diseases (AILD). The primary aim of our study was to investigate ANA positivity and their patterns in multiple liver diseases, including primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), hepatitis B virus infection (HBV), hepatitis C virus infection (HCV), and hepatic carcinoma (HCC). Besides, we also compared the ANA titers and patterns in patients with liver disease, SARD, and healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

A total of 2537 patients with SARD, 137 PBC cases, 57 AIH cases, 3420 HBV cases, 769 HCV cases, 268 HCC cases, and 1073 HC were retrospectively assessed. The titers and patterns of ANA were detected with the IIFA method.

RESULTS

ANA positivity rate was considerably discernible between these diseases, which is 90.1% in SARD, 93.4% in PBC, 49.1% in AIH, 19.1% in HBV, 13.9% in HCV, and 23.5% in HCC. Moreover, only 4.9% of HCC cases, 2.5% of HBV patients, and 1.6% of HCV patients had an ANA titer ≥ 1:320. The mixed pattern which composed of at least two patterns majorly lied in PBC. AC-15 and AC-21 was frequently related to liver diseases; the former pattern was more frequently found in AIH (84.2%) and PBC (8.8%), and the latter pattern was easily seen in PBC (62.2%) and HCC (22.6%). The positive rate of ANA in HC was 12.2%, and its major pattern was AC-2.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences in ANA positivity among patients with SARD and various liver diseases. Some mixed patterns may provide important evidence for the diagnosis of PBC. Clinicians should pay attention to ANA patterns and titer during the interpretation of this test. Key Points • Defining the clinical relevance of antinuclear antibody (ANA) using indirect immunofluorescence assay in the context of diseases can be an important tool for the clinician in the diagnostic work-up of patients with liver diseases. • The mixed pattern of ANA is majorly found in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). ANA patterns including AC-15 and AC-21 are frequently related to liver diseases. AC-15 is more often found in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (84.2%) and PBC (8.8%), and AC-21 is easily found in PBC (62.2%, and hepatic carcinoma (HCC) (22.6%). • ANA positivity can be seen in 19.1% of hepatitis B virus infection (HBV) cases, 13.9% of hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) cases, and 23.5% of HCC cases. Only 2.5% of HBV patients, 1.6% of HCV patients, and 4.9% of HCC cases have an ANA titer ≥ 1:320.

Antinuclear antibodies in Frontotemporal Dementia: the tip's of autoimmunity iceberg?

Recent studies suggest a role of the autoimmune system dysregulation in Frontotemporal dementia (FTD). In the present study, we performed a broad immunological screening in a large sample of sporadic FTD patients. We reported a significant increase of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA) positivity in 100 FTD patients as compared to 100 healthy controls (HC) (60% vs. 13%, p < .001). In FTD, ANA-positive and ANA-negative patients did not differ for any clinical feature. These data extend and further confirm autoimmune dysregulation in FTD. However, it still remains to be clarified whether these antibodies have a potential pathogenic role or represent simply an epiphenomenon.

Uncommon patterns of antinuclear antibodies recognizing mitotic spindle apparatus antigens and clinical associations

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are key biomarkers in the evaluation of rheumatic diseases. The prevalence and clinical significance of uncommon or rare patterns, particularly those directed at the mitotic spindle apparatus (MSA), are not well understood. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and clinical significance of anti-MSA patterns in a Colombian population.During 2013 and 2014, 113,491 consecutive determinations of ANA were studied for the presence of uncommon patterns. Clinical and laboratory data of anti-MSA positive patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.Of the 113,491 patients tested, 60,501 (53%) were positive for ANA, of which 834 (1.3%) were positive for uncommon/rare patterns of ANA (anti-MSA in 592 cases). Of these 592 cases, complete data were available in 329 patients, of whom 116 had an established diagnosis. Anti-MSA antibodies were the only ANA positive test in 81% patients. At least one fine reactivity was identified in 19/116 (16.3%) of ANA-positive patients, of which anti-Ro was the most prevalent (18/116, 15.5%).The most frequent patterns were nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) (56%) and MSA-2 (25%). The NuMA pattern had the highest ANA titers: mean 320 (range 80-2560) and behaved as monospecific antibodies. The most frequent systemic autoimmune diseases were Sjögren syndrome (SS) (18.1%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (13.8%), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (11%). Undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) was associated with the centrosome (P < .001), NuMA (P < .02) and MSA-2 (P < .45) patterns. Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) was associated with the NuMA pattern (P < .02) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was associated with the MSA-2 (P < .001), centrosome (P < .68) and CENP-F (P < .38) patterns, previously unreported findings. Malignancies were found in 8 patients (50% were papillary thyroid cancer).In a large cohort of ANA determinations, uncommon patterns were found in around 1% of cases. The most frequent anti-MSA patterns found were NuMA and MSA-2. More than 50% of patients with anti-MSA had an associated CTD, mainly SS, RA and SLE, and anti-MSA behaved as monospecific antibodies. Other entities of presumed autoimmune origin, like CIU and SNHL, might be associated with these patterns.

Autoantibodies Associated With Connective Tissue Diseases: What Meaning for Clinicians?

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, myositis, Sjögren's syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis are systemic diseases which are often associated with a challenge in diagnosis. Autoantibodies (AAbs) can be detected in these diseases and help clinicians in their diagnosis. Actually, pathophysiology of these diseases is associated with the presence of antinuclear antibodies. In the last decades, many new antibodies were discovered, but their implication in pathogenesis of CTDs remains unclear. Furthermore, the classification of these AAbs is nowadays misused, as their targets can be localized outside of the nuclear compartment. Interestingly, in most cases, each antibody is associated with a specific phenotype in CTDs and therefore help in better defining either the disease subtypes or diseases activity and outcome. Because of recent progresses in their detection and in the comprehension of their pathogenesis implication in CTD-associated antibodies, clinicians should pay attention to the presence of these different AAbs to improve patient's management. In this review, we propose to focus on the different phenotypes and features associated with each autoantibody used in clinical practice in those CTDs.

Evaluation of an automated connective tissue disease screening assay in Korean patients with systemic rheumatic diseases

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utilities of the automated connective tissues disease screening assay, CTD screen, in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. A total of 1093 serum samples were assayed using CTD screen and indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) methods. Among them, 162 were diagnosed with systemic rheumatic disease, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and mixed connective tissue disease (MCT). The remaining 931 with non-systemic rheumatic disease were assigned to the control group. The median ratios of CTD screen tests were significantly higher in the systemic rheumatic disease group than in the control group. The positive likelihood ratios of the CTD screen were higher than those of IIF in patients with total rheumatic diseases (4.1 vs. 1.6), including SLE (24.3 vs. 10.7). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-AUCs) of the CTD screen for discriminating total rheumatic diseases, RA, SLE, and MCT from controls were 0.68, 0.56, 0.92 and 0.80, respectively. The ROC-AUCs of the combinations with IIF were significantly higher in patients with total rheumatic diseases (0.72) and MCT (0.85) than in those of the CTD screen alone. Multivariate analysis indicated that both the CTD screen and IIF were independent variables for predicting systemic rheumatic disease. CTD screen alone and in combination with IIF were a valuable diagnostic tool for predicting systemic rheumatic diseases, particularly for SLE.

Use of panel testing for detection of antinuclear antibody in a resource-limited setting: an appraisal

OBJECTIVES

Despite an increase in the incidence of systemic connective tissue diseases (CTD), panel testing for detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is not a routine practice in many health centers of the Indian subcontinent. Consequently, the data on its significance is scanty.

METHODS

To evaluate utility of panel testing, line immunoassay (LIA) and indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody test (IIF-ANA) were performed in 321 cases of CTD.

RESULTS

Out of 321 serum samples screened by the above tests, 227 were positive and 18 were negative by both LIA and IIF-ANA. Additional 11/321 (3.4%) cases were picked up by LIA. SSA was most common specificity in these cases followed by SSA/SSB, SSB, Ro-52, Jo-1, dsDNA and nRNP/Sm.

CONCLUSION

Use of LIA along with IF-ANA and ELISA improves sensitivity of CTD screening.

Prevalence of antinuclear antibodies in healthy Lebanese subjects, 2008-2015: a cross-sectional study involving 10,814 subjects

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are found at varying frequencies in healthy populations, depending on geographical location and ethnic background of participants. The main objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of ANA in healthy Lebanese population in the period 2008-2015. Study subjects comprised 10,851 individuals (3311 males and 7503 females). ANA positivity was determined using immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells. The prevalence of positive ANA test at a titer of ≥1:100 was 26.4 %, with 696 individuals (6.4 %) having titers exceeding 1:100. Most ANA-positive cases were recorded between 2013 and 2015, which reflected increased assay sensitivity. ANA positivity was associated with increased age and with female gender. Significant increases in ANA positivity were seen with advanced age, with steady increases from the 30- to 40-year age group through the >70-year age group, with significantly higher prevalence noted in female participants. There was a steady and significant reduction in the number of ANA-positive cases with higher ANA titers, which ranged from 20.0 % (1/100) to 3.7 % (1/320), 1.7 % (1/640), and 1.1 % (1/1000). While 45 % of low ANA titer was seen in 31-60-year age category, compared with 19.8 % for 61+ year category, the distribution of high ANA titer was more uniform between 31+ year age categories, which ranged from 11.4 % (31-40 years) to 12.4 % (>70 years). This was consistently and significantly higher in female participants. The prevalence and distribution of ANA among Lebanese individuals were comparable to the rates established for Western countries and confirm the contribution of female gender and advanced age to ANA positivity.

Impact of external quality assessment on antinuclear antibody detection performance

Our objective was to evaluate performance of the clinical laboratories for the detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by using indirect immunofluorescence method (IIF), in France. A national external quality assessment (EQA) on ANA detection was organized by the French health products safety agency once a year since 1998. Between 606 to 687 laboratories together with six university reference laboratories experienced in performing tests in autoimmunity participated in the six-year consecutive survey. Each laboratory had to answer to methodological procedures and give coded responses. Variability in IIF methodological procedure was observed. Use of inappropriate microscope magnifications for reading slides or nonconventional cutoff dilution of serum were pointed out to concerned laboratories. Concerning ANA measurement, the rate of good responses ranged from 92.7% to 99.5% of the laboratories when the samples contained ANA. A wide dispersion of ANA titers obtained on a same sample was repeatly observed every year. Misinterpretation of particular fluorescence pattern was noticed. On ANA negative sample, the rate of good responses was 94.3%. In conclusion, ANA detection in routine practice is far from being standardized. However, EQA may have an impact on ANA detection performance when it is conducted on several consecutive year surveys, by providing advice for participating laboratories to limit inter laboratory variations related to methodological procedures.

Autoantibody Detection Using Multiplex Technologies

Measurement of multiple antibodies has been possible for years using labor-intensive methods such as counterimmunoelectrophoresis and radioimmunoprecipitation. Recently, simpler methods that are more practical for routine analysis, often described as multiplex technologies, have been introduced. One common technique, the line assay, uses nitrocellulose strips that are precoated at different locations with more than a dozen recombinant proteins or peptides. Detection of results may be performed visually or with scanning instrumentation. A second technique uses families of polystyrene beads that are dyed to establish a unique identity; each bead type is then coated with a specific affinity-purified or recombinant protein. Detection is performed by flow cytometry. There have been multiple descriptions of the use of these techniques for measuring antibodies associated with the antinuclear antibody screen. More recent reports describe applications to antibodies associated with hypothyroidism, ANCA, anti-phospholipid syndrome, and celiac disease. This review summarizes the work that has been performed to date and examines the potential benefits of multiplexing to both the laboratory and the physician.

Anti-pseudo-PCNA type 1 (anti-SG2NA) pattern: Track down Cancer, not SLE

OBJECTIVE

Describe the clinical significance of anti-SG2NA antibodies also called anti-pseudo-PCNA type 1 (proliferating cell nuclear antigen auto-antibodies) which are rare antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) staining distinctly S/G2 proliferative HEp-2 cells by indirect immunofluorescence. By analogy with anti-PCNA antibodies, they have been suspected to be associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), cancers or viral diseases.

METHODS

From May 2006 to February 2013, 16,827 patients were tested positive for ANAs in the Laboratory of Immunology, Strasbourg, France. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and biological data from 126 patients with anti-pseudo-PCNA type 1 antibodies.

RESULTS

There was a 0.75% prevalence of anti-pseudo-PCNA type 1 Abs among ANAs(+) patients. Median age was 56.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 13.4 years) with a sex ratio female/male of 1.9. Compared to ANAs(+) patients, many more patients have been hospitalized in the Oncology and Hematology Department (23% vs. 6.3%, P < 0.05). Indeed, anti-pseudo-PCNA type 1 Abs were detected in 33 patients suffering from solid and hematological cancers (26%). Another group of patients presented various auto-immune diseases but surprisingly none of our patients was affected with SLE when 5 out of 8 patients in anti-PCNAs(+) Abs group (P < 5.10(-6)) were. Finally, the presence of anti-pseudo-PCNA type 1 Abs was associated in 30 cases with other auto-Abs reflecting a more general breakdown of B cell tolerance against other self-antigens.

CONCLUSION

Considering our results, explorations for tumors should be at least recommended for patients with anti-pseudo-PCNA type 1 Abs. Lupus disease is not associated with these autoAbs.

Investigation of autoimmune diseases accompanying Hashimoto's thyroiditis in children and adolescents and evaluation of cardiac signs

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, it was aimed to investigate the concomitance of additional cardiac problems, mainly mitral valve prolapse, in adolescents and pediatric patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, by screening autoimmune markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven euthyroid patients, who applied to the Pediatric Endocrinology clinic at our institution with marked symptoms of hypothyroidism at the time of diagnosis, and were diagnosed and treated for Hashimoto's thyroiditis, were included in the present study. All patients were evaluated by performing non-organ specific autoantibodies which could be tested at our institution, thyroid ultrasonography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and 24-h holter monitorization.

RESULTS

Of the 57 cases with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, 48 (84.2%) were female, and nine (15.8%) were male. In the echocardiographic evaluation, mitral valve problems were detected in 10 (17.5%) of all cases; mitral valve prolapse was diagnosed in eight (seven females and one male) cases, and mitral insufficiency was diagnosed in two female cases. First-degree atrioventricular block was observed in only two patients during 24-h holter monitorization. Different non-organ specific autoantibody positivity was distributed as antinuclear antibody in 15 (26.3%) cases, anticardiolipin IgG in two cases, anticardiolipin IgM in three cases, tissue transglutaminase IgA in one, glutamic acid decarboxylase in one, anti-insulin antibody in four cases, antiphospholipid IgG in one, and antiphospholipid IgM in one case.

CONCLUSION

It should be underlined that patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis should to be followed up closely for mitral valve prolapse and accompanying autoimmune diseases.

Up-to-Date Applications of Microarrays and Their Way to Commercialization

This review addresses up-to-date applications of Protein Microarrays. Protein Microarrays play a significant role in basic research as well as in clinical applications and are applicable in a lot of fields, e.g., DNA, proteins and small molecules. Additionally they are on the way to enter clinics in routine diagnostics. Protein Microarrays can be powerful tools to improve healthcare. An overview of basic characteristics to mediate essential knowledge of this technique is given. To reach this goal, some challenges still have to be addressed. A few applications of Protein Microarrays in a medical context are shown. Finally, an outlook, where the potential of Protein Microarrays is depicted and speculations how the future of Protein Microarrays will look like are made.

The prevalence of antinuclear antibodies in patients with sarcoidosis

Introduction. Sarcoidosis, which is a chronic inflammatory granulomatous disease, can mimic different rheumatologic diseases including connective tissue diseases. Antinuclear antibodies are the markers used for connective tissue diseases. Aim. To determine antinuclear antibody frequency and any possible correlation with clinical and laboratory data in sarcoidosis patients. Material and Method. Forty-two sarcoidosis patients, 45 rheumatoid arthritis patients, and 45 healthy volunteers who were followed up in rheumatology outpatient clinic were included in this study. Demographic, clinical, serological, and radiological data of all patients were recorded. Antinuclear antibodies were determined with indirect immunofluorescent method and 1/100 titration was accepted as positive. The cases that were ANA positive were evaluated with immunoblot method. Results. Average age of the 42 patients (10 males) with sarcoidosis was 45.2 (20–70 years), and average disease duration was 3.5 years. ANA positivity was detected in 12 (28.5%) patients with sarcoidosis (1/100 in 10 patients, 1/320 in two patients), in 19 of RA patients (42.2%), and in two of healthy volunteers in low titer (P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis made by immunblot test, one patient had anticentromere antibody, one had anti-Ro antibody, one had anti-Scl-70 antibody, one had anti-dsDNA antibody, and eight patients were negative. The two patients who had anticentromere and anti-Scl-70 antibodies had also Sjögren's syndrome and scleroderma diagnosis, respectively. Discussion. The prevalence of ANA in patients with sarcoidosis was found to be significantly higher than healthy control group and lower than RA patients. This result shows that ANA may have an important role in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis and also could be important in revealing the overlap syndromes of sarcoidosis-connective tissue diseases. Further studies with larger series are necessary in this subject.

Determination of Anti-nuclear Antibody Pattern Distribution and Clinical Relationship

Background and Objectives: Autoantibodies are immunglobulins occurred directly against autoantigens that are known as endogen antigens. Autoimmune disease is an occasion that the body begins a fight against its own cells and tissues. The antibodies that are created by the body against its own cell nuclei are called as anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), and one of the methods used for detection and pattern of ANA is indirect immunofluorescence test (IIF). In the present study, it was aimed to determine the rate of ANA positivity and patterns of the positive specimens, and to investigate the relationship between ANA positivity and diseases in patients.

Methods: ANA test results of a total of 3127 patients admitted during March 2010 to December 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. ANA test (HEp 20-10, EUROIMMUN, Germany) was used in dilution of 1:100 in IIF test.

Results: A total of 494 (15.8%) resulted as ANA positive. ANA positivity rate was significantly higher in female patients than the male ones (p<0.001). The most frequent ANA patterns were coarse speckled pattern (154 patients, 31.2%), nucleolar pattern (89 patients, 18.0%), fine speckled pattern (57 patients, 11.5%), and speckled pattern (48 patients, 9.7%). ANA positivity was most commonly determined in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (42 patients, 8.5%), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (29 patients, 5.9%), and rheumatoid vasculitis (RV) (28 patients, 5.7%). The most frequent symptoms or findings were joint pain (127 patients, 26.0%) and anemia (28 patients, 5.7%). ANA positivity rates were found to be significantly higher in patients with RA (p<0.001), with SLE (p<0.001), and with Raynaud phenomenon (p=0.001) in comparison to the controls. Amongst the most frequent diseases evaluated, no significant differences were found between the control groups and the groups of RV (p=0.089), multiple sclerosis (p=0.374), and Sjögren syndrome (p=0.311) in terms of ANA positivity rates.

Conclusions: The present study is the first study reporting the positivity rate and distribution of ANA in Bolu located in northwestern Turkey. Information about the pattern types and the distribution of the patterns according to the diseases and symptoms contribute in diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. It is observed that clinical diagnosis has been supported significantly by ANA test according to data of our study.

A comparison of anti-nuclear antibody quantification using automated enzyme immunoassays and immunofluorescence assays

Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) have traditionally been evaluated using indirect fluorescence assays (IFA) with HEp-2 cells. Quantitative immunoassays (EIA) have replaced the use of HEp-2 cells in some laboratories. Here, we evaluated ANA in 400 consecutive and unselected routinely referred patients using IFA and automated EIA techniques. The IFA results generated by two independent laboratories were compared with the EIA results from antibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), from ANA screening, and from tests of the seven included subantigens. The final IFA and EIA results for 386 unique patients were compared. The majority of the results were the same between the two methods (n = 325, 84%); however, 8% (n = 30) yielded equivocal results (equivocal-negative and equivocal-positive) and 8% (n = 31) yielded divergent results (positive-negative). The results showed fairly good agreement, with Cohen's kappa value of 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.14–0.46), which decreased to 0.23 (95% CI = 0.06–0.40) when the results for dsDNA were omitted. The EIA method was less reliable for assessing nuclear and speckled reactivity patterns, whereas the IFA method presented difficulties detecting dsDNA and Ro activity. The automated EIA method was performed in a similar way to the conventional IFA method using HEp-2 cells; thus, automated EIA may be used as a screening test.

International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies

Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) are fundamental for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, and have been determined by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) for decades. As the demand for ANA testing increased, alternative techniques were developed challenging the classic IIFA. These alternative platforms differ in their antigen profiles, sensitivity and specificity, raising uncertainties regarding standardisation and interpretation of incongruent results. Therefore, an international group of experts has created recommendations for ANA testing by different methods. Two groups of experts participated in this initiative. The European autoimmunity standardization initiative representing 15 European countries and the International Union of Immunologic Societies/World Health Organization/Arthritis Foundation/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention autoantibody standardising committee. A three-step process followed by a Delphi exercise with closed voting was applied. Twenty-five recommendations for determining ANA (1-13), anti-double stranded DNA antibodies (14-18), specific antibodies (19-23) and validation of methods (24-25) were created. Significant differences between experts were observed regarding recommendations 24-25 (p<0.03). Here, we formulated recommendations for the assessment and interpretation of ANA and associated antibodies. Notably, the roles of IIFA as a reference method, and the importance of defining nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, were emphasised, while the need to incorporate alternative automated methods was acknowledged. Various approaches to overcome discrepancies between methods were suggested of which an improved bench-to-bedside communication is of the utmost importance. These recommendations are based on current knowledge and can enable harmonisation of local algorithms for testing and evaluation of ANA and related autoantibodies. Last but not least, new more appropriate terminologies have been suggested.

Is identification of anti-SSA and/or -SSB antibodies necessary in serum samples referred for antinuclear antibodies testing?

BACKGROUND

Anti-SSA and -SSB antibodies are clinically important antinuclear antibodies in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We evaluated fluorescence characteristics and clinical significance of anti-SSA and -SSB and explored whether identification of these antibodies was necessary in clinical application.

RESULTS

Of 4,978 consecutive samples, 259 showed anti-SSA or -SSB reactivity, clinical information of which were analyzed. Compared with SSA+SSB- and SSA-SSB+ group, SSA+SSB+ group showed a lower proportion (0.5%) of negative specimens detected with antinuclear antibody assay and a higher proportion (53.5%) of specimens with high titer. Anti-SSA- and/or -SSB-positive samples presented various patterns. However, 64.6% of SSA+SSB+ samples presented speckled pattern, significantly higher than SSA+SSB- and SSA-SSB+ samples. A total of 475 specimens containing anti-SSA or -SSB were obtained from 302 individuals. Clinical information was obtained for 259 of them, which were further analyzed. The prevalence of Sjögren syndrome (SS) was significantly higher, and that of other diseases was lower in SSA+SSB+ than in SSA+SSB- group. Of the 259 individuals, 71 anti-SSA- and/or -SSB-positive patients had blood drawn on 2 or more occasions over the 2-year study period. The number of tests per patient was 2.7 ± 1.1. In 7 of the 71 patients, anti-SSA was observed in some but not all samples, so was anti-SSB in 6.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the identification of anti-SSA and -SSB antibodies is necessary, when corresponding diseases are suspected. The specificity of anti-SSA for the diagnosis of SS could be improved, when combined with anti-SSB. SS patients need not be identified frequently for anti-SSA and -SSB because of their stability.

Specificity of anti-SSB as a diagnostic marker for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus

The aim of the present study was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of anti-Sjögren’s syndrome type B (SSB) antibodies for diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to understand the correlation between anti-SSB antibodies and the clinical manifestations of SLE. A line immunoassay (LIA) was used to detect the presence of serum anti-SSB antibodies in SLE patients. The clinical manifestations of the patients were recorded to enable their correlation with the serum anti-SSB antibodies to be analyzed. In 25.7% of the 74 SLE patients, the serum was positive for anti-SSB antibodies, whereas only 3.3% of the 30 control cases were positive. The specificity of anti-SSB antibodies for detecting SLE was 96.7%. In anti-SSB antibody-positive SLE patients, the incidence of cheek erythema, alopecia, serositis, secondary Sjögren’s syndrome (sSS), leukocytopenia, elevated immunoglobulin (Ig)G and positive presence of anti-Sjögren’s syndrome type A (SSA)60 or anti-SSA52 antibodies was higher than in the anti-SSB antibody-negative group (P<0.05). Anti-SSB antibodies are important for the diagnosis of SLE and are associated with cheek erythema, alopecia, serositis, sSS, leukocytopenia, the elevation of IgG and positive presence of anti-SSA60 or anti-SSA52 antibodies.

The clinical utility of a positive antinuclear antibody test result

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study investigated the clinical utility of a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test performed outside of the rheumatology setting. Prior studies have investigated the frequency of ANA positivity within the general population. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the clinical utility of a positive ANA test result in a real-world setting by reviewing the final diagnoses of patients who were referred to a tertiary rheumatology clinic for evaluation of a positive ANA test result.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of patients presenting to the authors between July 2007 and July 2009. Patients were included in the evaluation if they were referred for a positive ANA test result. All relevant descriptive and laboratory data were collated, as were the initial reasons for ordering ANA testing and the ultimate diagnoses reached. Positive predictive values for a "positive ANA test result" were calculated for all antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic diseases and for lupus specifically.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients were referred for a positive ANA test result. The positive predictive value of a positive ANA test result in this cohort was 2.1% for lupus and 9.1% for any antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic disease. No antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic disease was identified in patients with an ANA<1:160. The most common reason for ordering ANA testing was widespread pain (54/232, 23.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, more than 90% of patients who were referred to a tertiary rheumatology clinic for a positive ANA test result had no evidence for an ANA-associated rheumatic disease. The poor predictive value of a positive ANA in this cohort was largely attributable to unnecessary testing in patients with low pretest probabilities for ANA-associated rheumatic disease.

Comparative study of immunofluorescent antinuclear antibody test and line immunoassay detecting 15 specific autoantibodies in patients with systemic rheumatic disease

Based on the currently proposed algorithms, antibodies specificities (sp-ANAs) are identified mainly in samples positive for fluorescent antinuclear antibodies (FANA) screening tests. The purpose of the present study was to compare diagnostic performances of FANA and line immune assay (LIA) detecting 15 sp-ANAs in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRD). In 948 sera from the patients with SRD (n = 590) and non-SRD (n = 358), we evaluated the fluorescent patterns and intensities in the FANA test, and compared the FANA results with sp-ANAs against nRNP, Sm, SS-A, Ro52, SS-B, Scl-70, PM/Scl, Jo-1, CENP B, PCNA, dsDNA, nucleosome, histone, ribosomal-P, and M2. The sensitivity and specificity was 75.9% and 52.5% of FANA test and 62.0% and 84.4% of sp-ANAs test for SRD detection. The overall agreement between FANA and sp-ANAs results was 69.2% (Kappa coefficient; 0.404). According to the clinical diagnosis, the levels of agreement varied from 33.3% to 83.1%. The positive predictive values of each FANA pattern for the detection of sp-ANAs were less than 50% except for the discrete speckled pattern (91.7%). The 1:100 intensity of FANA as well as the monoreactivity of LIA, anti-SSA(-)/anti-Ro52(+), or FANA(-)/sp-ANAs(+) was associated with non-SRD. Antibodies against ribosomal-P or PCNA were specific for systemic lupus eryhthematosus. This study highlights the need for careful interpretation of FANA test results to assess sp-ANAs and the application of sp-ANAs tests including less-common autoantibodies. In patients with clinical suspicion of SRD, screening with both FANA and sp-ANAs tests could improve diagnostic efficiency.

An evaluation of autoimmune antibody testing patterns in a Canadian health region and an evaluation of a laboratory algorithm aimed at reducing unnecessary testing

Autoantibody tests are often ordered inappropriately. We aimed to evaluate the ordering patterns of these tests in our local health region and to develop a laboratory algorithm aimed at reducing unnecessary tests. Laboratory data including the number and sequence of tests, ordering physician specialties and results for antinuclear (ANA), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) and anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody tests from 2007 to 2009 were evaluated. Based on this information and a clinical consensus meeting, an algorithm was developed and applied retrospectively to 1 year of inpatient laboratory data to simulate potential cost savings. We identified a large volume of these autoantibody tests performed, equating to testing costs of $862,706.72, where less than 17 % of each were positive. Repeated ANA tests were mostly ordered after a previously negative result, and 1 % of patients with negative results changed to ≥1:160 on repeat testing. Close to half of all ENA and anti-dsDNA tests that were ordered were done so simultaneously with ANA, suggesting their use as screening tests. This was done more frequently in the inpatient setting. An algorithm was developed where ENA and anti-dsDNA tests would be cancelled if ANA was negative in the same sample. ANA repeated within 1 year would be cancelled and the prior result provided. Application of the algorithm retrospectively simulated a 30 % cost savings. Repeat testing and simultaneous ordering of multiple tests contributed to the excessive ordering of autoantibody tests in our health region. Our proposed algorithm would reduce testing costs and should be accompanied by appropriate educational information for physicians.

The Belgian Systemic Sclerosis Cohort: Correlations Between Disease Severity Scores, Cutaneous Subsets, and Autoantibody Profile

Objective.

To report baseline and followup data on the first 438 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) included in the Belgian Systemic Sclerosis Cohort.

Methods.

According to LeRoy and Medsger’s classification, 73 patients with limited SSc (lSSc), 279 with limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc), and 86 with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) were included. History was collected and clinical examination, blood tests, and paraclinical investigations were repeated. The Disease Activity Score (DAS) and Disease Severity Score (DSS) of several organ systems were computed. An organ system was considered to demonstrate SSc if the corresponding DSS was ≥ 1.

Results.

At baseline, patients with dcSSc had more general, joint/tendon, muscle, gastrointestinal, and kidney involvement. Mean DLCO was below normal in patients with lSSc, indicating unsuspected lung involvement. Patients with anti-Scl-70 had more vascular, skin, joint/tendon, and lung involvement. Patients with anti-RNA polymerase III had more skin and joint/tendon involvement compared to patients with anticentromere. Time to death was statistically shorter for patients with dcSSc. New-onset lung disease was the most common complication over time. No changes in DAS were observed. By contrast, the general and the skin DSS worsened in patients with lcSSc and lSSc, respectively. Fifteen percent of patients with lSSc shifted to lcSSc at Month 30, but neither serology nor capillaroscopy findings at baseline were helpful in identifying those at risk.

Conclusion.

Our data indicate that the DSS can be used to define organ involvement in SSc. Differences can be seen between subsets classified not only according to cutaneous subtypes but also to autoantibody profile.

Using the antinuclear antibody test to diagnose rheumatic diseases: when does a positive test warrant further investigation?

The anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) test is ordered commonly as a screening test for rheumatic diseases. Although ANA positivity is highly sensitive for certain rheumatic diseases, the presence of ANA is nonspecific and can be associated with numerous nonrheumatic factors, including environmental exposures, malignancies, drugs, and infections. This article describes a practical approach for physicians when evaluating patients using a positive ANA test. In the absence of connective tissue disease symptoms, the ANA test has minimal clinical significance in diagnosing rheumatic diseases. Understanding how to use ANA test results appropriately may reduce unnecessary referrals and costly workups.

Anti-enteric neuronal antibodies and the irritable bowel syndrome

Background/Aims

Functional gastrointestinal disorders are those in which no abnormal metabolic or physical processes, which can account for the symptoms, can be identified. The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a significant functional disorder, which affects 10-20 percent of the population worldwide. Predominant symptoms of IBS are abnormal defecation associated with abdominal pain, both of which may be exacerbated by psychogenic stress. Our study was designed to test a hypothesis that symptoms in a subset of patients with a diagnosis of IBS are associated with an autoimmune degenerative neuropathy in the enteric nervous system.

Methods

Serum was collected from Rome II-IBS patients and controls at the University of North Carolina Functional Gastrointestinal Diseases Center. Assay procedures were immunohistochemical localization of antibody binding to enteric neurons and human protein microarray assay for antigens recognized by antibodies in the sera.

Results

Eighty-seven percent of IBS sera and 59% of control sera contained anti-enteric neuronal antibodies. Antibody immunostaining was seen in the nucleus and cytoplasm of neurons in the enteric nervous system. Protein microarray analysis detected antibody reactivity for autoantigens in serum with anti-enteric neuronal antibodies and no reactivity for the same autoantigens in samples not containing anti-enteric neuronal antibodies in our immunostaining assay. Antibodies in sera from IBS patients recognized only 3 antigens out of an 8,000 immunoprotein array. The 3 antigens were: (1) a nondescript ribonucleoprotein (RNP-complex); (2) small nuclear ribonuclear polypeptide A; and (3) Ro-5,200 kDa.

Conclusions

Results of the present study suggest that symptoms in a subset of IBS patients might be a reflection of enteric neuronal damage or loss, caused by circulating anti-enteric autoimmune antibodies.

The relationship between antinuclear antibody data and antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens in a large laboratory cohort

BACKGROUND

Anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies (anti-ENA) have diagnostic significance in systemic rheumatic disease (SRD).

METHODS

Anti-ENA were tested in 1685/30,196 sera that were submitted sequentially for antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing. Frequency was stratified by ANA titer and pattern, by referral source, by submitted diagnosis and by patient age and sex.

RESULTS

Anti-ENA frequency increased with ANA titer (7.3% at < 32%-43.3% at ≥ 1024). Anti-histone (11.6%) and anti-SSA/SSB (13.9%) were the most frequent finding with a homo\xadgeneous pattern; anti-SSA/SSB (39.7%) and anti-RNP/anti-Sm (37.7%) were the most frequent finding with a speckled pattern. Sera with speckled, multiple and homogenous ANA patterns accounted for 92.6% of positive anti-ENA findings. At ANA titer ≥ 256, 29.2% of these sera were tested for anti-ENA, of which 41.2% were positive; frequency was higher with an accompanying diagnosis of SRD (53.5% vs. 36.5%, p < 0.004 by χ2-test) but not with referral by rheumatologists (43.5% vs. 35.9%) and did not differ by patient age or sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Reflexive anti-ENA testing may be helpful among sera with ANA titer ≥ 256 and homogeneous, speckled or multiple patterns, irrespective of referral source or accompanying diagnosis. Further work is needed to evaluate the clinical impact of this protocol.

Antinuclear antibody positive autoimmune disorders in North India: an appraisal

The autoimmune disorders (AID) have since long been considered to be commoner in Western world as compared to Asian countries. This, however, may not be true as in developing countries, there are incomplete epidemiological data and lack of advanced diagnostic facilities leading to under diagnosis in many cases. In this study, we performed an 11-year retrospective analysis of medical records of all clinically suspected and immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody test (IF-ANA)-positive cases. The IF-ANA-positive cases in the year 2006-2007 were further analyzed to find out the morbidity contribution by IF-ANA-positive AID. A total of 36,310 serum samples were screened for antinuclear antibody (ANA) between the years 1996 and 2006. The mean positivity was 12.3%. A constant and statistically significant increase in AID was noticed over the last 11 years. In the year 2006-2007, out of 3,435 suspected AID cases, 18.9% were ANA positive. Of these, 86.0% were adult patients with age ranging from 2¼ to 88 years. A female preponderance was also noted with a female-to-male ratio of 3:1. Among the ANA-positive connective tissue disorders (CTD), systemic lupus erythematosus was the most common clinical diagnosis (4.6/10,000 cases) followed by scleroderma (1.2/10,000) and overlap syndrome (0.7/10,000). Rheumatic, renal and hematopoietic systems were commonly involved. The overall frequency of CTD was 21%. The report is the first and largest hospital-based study from India, highlighting the rising incidence and clinical profile of ANA-positive AID.

Determination of cut-off titers and agreement between immunofluorescence and immunoblotting methods for detecting antinuclear antibodies in children

Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is a diagnostic adjunct in patients with suspected autoimmune connective tissue diseases, and various detection methods are in use. The aim of this study was to analyze the agreement between the ANA immunoflourescence (IF) and immunoblotting (IB) methods and determine cut-off for children subjects in a laboratory setting. We evaluated 729 serum samples that were analyzed by both ANA IF and IB. The results were evaluated by chi(2) test and, for agreement, kappa index was used. Frequencies determined for both 1:40-1:100 cut-off titers of ANA IF in relation to IB testing supported the idea that 1:100 starting dilution should be recommended in children subjects for ANA IF method and antigen specific immunoblot testing was needed, especially for some of the ANA IF negative samples. Agreement between the two methods, especially with homogenous, granular, and nucleolar ANA IF patterns, was statistically significant.

Prevalence of antinuclear antibodies in 3 groups of healthy individuals: blood donors, hospital personnel, and relatives of patients with autoimmune diseases

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are frequently found in healthy populations. To define the prevalence, pattern, and titer of ANA in different groups of the healthy Mexican population, we studied 304 individuals, classified into 3 groups: 104 blood donors, 100 hospital personnel working at The State General Hospital, which included doctors, laboratory technicians, and nurses; and 100 relatives of patient diagnosed either with systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, all of them apparently healthy at the time of study. We determined ANA using immunofluorescence microscopy performed on HEp-2 cells. Fluorescence was detected in 165 serum samples (54.3%). The most frequent pattern was the speckled (50.3%). The most frequent dilution was 1:40 (35.4%), followed by 1:80 (13.4%), 1:160 (3.2%), and 1:320 (1.3%).Regarding the results by study group, we found a trend toward higher ANA levels in group 2 (hospital personnel), compared with group 1 (blood donors) and group 3 (relatives of patients), a trend also reflected by the increasing frequency of serum titers of 1:80 and higher (P = 0.074). According to occupation, medical doctors showed a higher incidence of speckled pattern when compared with other occupations (P = 0.022). Medical doctors (n = 75) showed also higher titers of this particular pattern (P = 0.03). In group 3, relatives of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus showed the speckled pattern more frequently than relatives of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, in low titers (P = 0.017). We suggest that ANA tests showing speckled pattern should be at a 1:160 titer or higher to be considered positive; other patterns such as homogeneous, peripheral, or centromeric might be considered positive even at low titers (</=1:40) although this needs investigation.ANA should generally not be tested without clinical indication. Positive ANA finding in the absence of physical signs and symptoms has limited diagnostic utility and should always be interpreted by a rheumatologist, in the context of clinical symptoms and results of laboratory tests for specific autoantibodies. Populations such as doctors and relatives of patients with autoimmune disease tend to presents increased ANA titers.

Automated evaluation of autoantibodies on human epithelial-2 cells as an approach to standardize cell-based immunofluorescence tests

Introduction

Analysis of autoantibodies (AAB) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is a basic tool for the serological diagnosis of systemic rheumatic disorders. Automation of autoantibody IIF reading including pattern recognition may improve intra- and inter-laboratory variability and meet the demand for cost-effective assessment of large numbers of samples. Comparing automated and visual interpretation, the usefulness for routine laboratory diagnostics was investigated.

Methods

Autoantibody detection by IIF on human epithelial-2 (HEp-2) cells was conducted in a total of 1222 consecutive sera of patients with suspected systemic rheumatic diseases from a university routine laboratory (n = 924) and a private referral laboratory (n = 298). IIF results from routine diagnostics were compared with a novel automated interpretation system.

Results

Both diagnostic procedures showed a very good agreement in detecting AAB (kappa = 0.828) and differentiating respective immunofluorescence patterns. Only 98 (8.0%) of 1222 sera demonstrated discrepant results in the differentiation of positive from negative samples. The contingency coefficients of chi-square statistics were 0.646 for the university laboratory cohort with an agreement of 93.0% and 0.695 for the private laboratory cohort with an agreement of 90.6%, P < 0.0001, respectively. Comparing immunofluorescence patterns, 111 (15.3%) sera yielded differing results.

Conclusions

Automated assessment of AAB by IIF on HEp-2 cells using an automated interpretation system is a reliable and robust method for positive/negative differentiation. Employing novel mathematical algorithms, automated interpretation provides reproducible detection of specific immunofluorescence patterns on HEp-2 cells. Automated interpretation can reduce drawbacks of IIF for AAB detection in routine diagnostics providing more reliable data for clinicians.

Detection and identification of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in a large community hospital

OBJECTIVE

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and their identification are important diagnostic tools in rheumatic diseases. We aimed to determine their prevalence in samples referred for ANA testing and to identify factors predicting more specific reactivities.

METHODS

We analyzed the first sample of 6422 consecutive patients for ANA. Positive samples were analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on Crithidia luciliae and by line immunoassay. We used multivariate logistic regression to detect predicting variables.

RESULTS

42.6% of all patients were ANA positive of which 13.0% showed > or = one extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) reactivity with anti-SSA/Ro (5.5%), anti-SSB/La (2.9%), anti-Cenp-B (2.5%) and anti-histones (2.2%) as the most prevalent antibodies. Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (dsDNA) were present in 1.0%. The strongest overall predictor was ANA intensity regardless of pattern. Cenp-B however was best predicted by pattern. Anti-dsDNA and anti-histone were more frequent in samples with a homogenous as compared with a speckled pattern. Anti-SSA and anti-SSB were more frequent in females and anti-Sm in patients < or = 30 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The best overall predictor of antibodies to ENA or dsDNA is ANA intensity. Anti-Cenp-B is however best predicted by pattern. Samples with low ANA intensity (1+) may not need further testing unless a high clinical suspicion of ANA-associated disease.

Challenges of automated screening and differentiation of non-organ specific autoantibodies on HEp-2 cells

Analysis of autoantibodies (AAB) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) remains the hallmark of diagnosing autoimmune diseases despite the introduction of multiplex techniques. Non-organ specific AAB are screened in routine diagnostics by IIF on HEp-2 cells. However, IIF results vary due to objective (e.g., cell fixation) and subjective factors (e.g., expert knowledge). Therefore, inter- and intralaboratory variance is relatively high. Standardisation of AAB testing by IIF remains a critical issue in and between routine laboratories and may be improved by automated interpretation systems. An overview of existing interpretation techniques will be given taking into account own data of the first fully automated reading system AKLIDES. The novel system provides fully automated reading of IIF images and software algorithms for the mathematical description of IIF AAB patterns. It can be used for screening and preclassification of non-organ specific AAB in routine diagnostics regarding systemic autoimmune and autoimmune liver diseases. Furthermore, this system paves the way for economic data processing of cell-based IIF assays and can contribute to the reduction of interlaboratory variance of AAB testing. More sophisticated pattern recognition algorithms and novel calibration systems will improve standardised quantifications of IIF image interpretation.

ANA detected by ELISA using nucleus of egg cell as antigen

Antinuclear antibodies, ANA, were usually detected with antigen of somatic cell nucleus. It has not been reported to detect ANA with egg cell nucleus as antigen. Enzyme linked immuosorbent assay, ELISA, coated with yolk was developed to detect ANA in our laboratory. A quality control test, cross absorption test, and cross antibody-induced test with yolk were performed. Results showed a good agreement between our method and IFA through measurement of the same samples from patients suspected of having rheumatic connective tissue diseases (Kappa=0.668, P=0.000). The results were not influenced by the RF and different sources of egg. CVs of inter-assay, were less than 10%. The cross absorption test was negative, as well; the ANA to somatic cell nucleus could be induced with egg cell nucleus. It is implied that there were both cross as well as overlapped Egg-ANA and Somatic-ANA. As egg nucleus, its volume was large, its purification was simple, so the better method might be established.