CXCR4 expression in vitreoretinal membranes

Untangling the Extracellular Matrix of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane: A Path Winding among Structure, Interactomics and Translational Medicine

Idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERMs) are fibrocellular sheets of tissue that develop at the vitreoretinal interface. The iERMs consist of cells and an extracellular matrix (ECM) formed by a complex array of structural proteins and a large number of proteins that regulate cell–matrix interaction, matrix deposition and remodelling. Many components of the ECM tend to produce a layered pattern that can influence the tractional properties of the membranes. We applied a bioinformatics approach on a list of proteins previously identified with an MS-based proteomic analysis on samples of iERM to report the interactome of some key proteins. The performed pathway analysis highlights interactions occurring among ECM molecules, their cell receptors and intra- or extracellular proteins that may play a role in matrix biology in this special context. In particular, integrin β1, cathepsin B, epidermal growth factor receptor, protein-glutamine gamma-glutamyltransferase 2 and prolow-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 are key hubs in the outlined protein–protein cross-talks. A section on the biomarkers that can be found in the vitreous humor of patients affected by iERM and that can modulate matrix deposition is also presented. Finally, translational medicine in iERM treatment has been summed up taking stock of the techniques that have been proposed for pharmacologic vitreolysis.

The extracellular matrix complexity of idiopathic epiretinal membranes and the bilaminar arrangement of the associated internal limiting membrane in the posterior retina

PURPOSE

To study the composition of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) of the retina, the extracellular matrix (ECM) of idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERMs), and the relationships occurring between the two membranes.

METHODS

Forty-six iERMs, 24 of them associated with the ILM, were collected and included in this study. The investigation has been carried out by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy on glutaraldehyde- and osmium-fixed epon-embedded samples and on frozen samples. Sections were double or triple labelled with antibodies against vimentin; collagens I, III, IV, α5(IV), and VI; laminin 1 + 2; laminin α2-, α4-, α5-, β1-, β2-, β3-, γ1-, and γ2-chains; entactin; and fibronectin.

RESULTS

iERM thickness was not uniform. Almost 14% of iERMs showed thickenings due to folding of their ECM component under the cell layer. The vitreal side of iERMs was often shorter than the attached ILM. In this case, the ILM resulted folded under the iERM. ILMs contained laminin 111; laminin α2-, α5-, β1-, β2-, and γ1-chains; entactin; collagens I; α5(IV); [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV); and VI. Laminins, entactin, and α5(IV) were gathered on the retinal half of the ILM, whereas collagens [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV) and I were restricted to the vitreal side. Collagen VI was detected on both sides of the ILM. iERMs expressed laminin 111, collagens III, [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV) and VI, entactin, and fibronectin. Entactin co-localized with laminins and collagen IV.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of laminins and collagen chain expression indicates that ILM contains laminin 111 (former laminin 1), laminin 521 (former laminin 11), laminin 211 (former laminin 2), collagen [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV), and collagen α3(IV)α4(IV)α5. In contrast, iERMs express only collagen [α1(IV)]₂α2(IV) and laminin 111. In addition, both iERMs and ILMs contain entactin. The presence of three major constituents of the basement membranes co-localized together in iERMs is suggestive for a deranged process of basement membrane formation which fails to assemble properly. In view of the many interactions occurring among its proteins, the ECM of either the iERMs or the ILMs can account for their reciprocal adhesiveness. In addition, the peculiar deposition of the ECM observed in some samples of iERM is suggestive for its involvement in the formation of macular puckers.

New insight into the pathogenesis of retinopathy of prematurity: assessment of whole-genome expression

BACKGROUND

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the most common preventable causes of blindness and impaired vision among children in developed countries. The aim of the study was to compare whole-genome expression in the first month of life in groups of infants with and without ROP.

METHODS

Blood samples were drawn from 111 newborns with a mean gestational age of 27.8 wk on the 5th, 14th, and 28th day of life (DOL). The mRNA samples were evaluated for gene expression with the use of human whole-genome microarrays. The infants were divided into two groups: no ROP (n = 61) and ROP (n = 50).

RESULTS

Overall, 794 genes were differentially expressed on the 5th DOL, 1,077 on the 14th DOL, and 3,223 on the 28th DOL. In each of the three time points during the first month of life, more genes were underexpressed than overexpressed in the ROP group. Fold change (FC), which was used in analysis of gene expression data, ranged between 1.0 and 1.5 in the majority of genes differentially expressed.

CONCLUSION

Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that genes in four pathways related to inflammatory response were consistently downregulated due to the following variables: ROP and gestational age.

The role of chemokines and their receptors in ocular disease

The migration and infiltration of cells into the eye whether blood-borne leucocytes, endothelial or epithelial cells occurs in many ocular diseases. Dysregulation of this process is apparent in chronic inflammation, corneal graft rejection, allergic eye disease and other sight-threatening conditions. Under normal and inflammatory conditions, chemokines and their receptors are important contributors to cell migration. To date, 47 chemokines and 19 chemokine receptors have been identified and characterised. In recent years, investigations into the role of chemokines and their receptors in ocular disease have generated an increasing number of publications. In the eye, the best understood action of these molecules has arisen from the study of their ability to control the infiltration of leucocytes in uveitis. However, the involvement of chemokines in angiogenesis in several ocular conditions and in the survival of corneal transplants demonstrates the multifaceted nature of their effects. Interestingly, the constitutive expression of chemokines and their receptors in ocular tissues suggests that certain chemokines have a homeostatic function. In this review, we discuss the nature and function of chemokines in health and disease, and describe the role of chemokines in the pathogenesis of different ocular conditions.

Expression of the chemokine receptor Cxcr4 mRNA during mouse brain development

The expression of Cxcr4 mRNA that encodes the receptor for the chemokine Sdf1 was studied during mouse brain development using in situ hybridization, from E9.5 to maturity at P21. At embryonic stages, expression is prominent in ventricular zones of stem cell proliferation. This abates during the postnatal period in parallel to the depopulation of ventricular zones. In addition, the Cxcr4 gene is expressed in some differentiating neuronal populations at E12.5, E14.5 and E17.5, such as scattered cells in the reticular formation, cranial nerve nuclei, peripheral ganglia, cerebellar external granule cells, zona incerta, ventral lateral geniculate thalamic nuclei, olfactory glomerular layer, hippocampal primordium and telencephalic preplate. High levels of expression are detected in preplate derivatives in all sectors of the marginal zone (MZ) of the telencephalic vesicles, including Cajal-Retzius (CR) cells, other MZ cells and subplate neurons. Cxcr4 expression is progressively downregulated postnatally, but remains significantly associated in the adult with Bergman glia in the cerebellum, the subgranular layer of the dentate gyrus, and the olfactory glomerular layer. In contrast, expression of Sdf1 mRNA is confined to the meninges and, in embryos, to the telencephalic intermediate zone. This expression pattern suggests that Sdf1 and its receptor Cxcr4 may exert trophic influences on precursor cell proliferation and some neuronal targets that remain to be identified and studied further.