1
|
Ryan CG, Karran EL, Wallwork SB, Pate JW, O'Keeffe M, Fullen BM, Livadas N, Jones N, Toumbourou JW, Gilchrist P, Cameron PA, Fatoye F, Ravindran D, Lorimer Moseley G. We Are All in This Together-Whole of Community Pain Science Education Campaigns to Promote Better Management of Persistent Pain. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:902-917. [PMID: 37918470 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Persistent pain is a major public health issue-estimated to affect a quarter of the world's population. Public understanding of persistent pain is based on outdated biomedical models, laden with misconceptions that are contrary to best evidence. This understanding is a barrier to effective pain management. Thus, there have been calls for public health-based interventions to address these misconceptions. Previous pain-focussed public education campaigns have targeted pain beliefs and behaviours that are thought to promote recovery, such as staying active. However, prevailing pain-related misconceptions render many of these approaches counter-intuitive, at best. Pain Science Education improves understanding of 'how pain works' and has been demonstrated to improve pain and disability outcomes. Extending Pain Science Education beyond the clinic to the wider community seems warranted. Learning from previous back pain-focussed and other public health educational campaigns could optimise the potential benefit of such a Pain Science Education campaign. Pain Science Education-grounded campaigns have been delivered in Australia and the UK and show promise, but robust evaluations are needed before any firm conclusions on their population impact can be made. Several challenges exist going forward. Not least is the need to ensure all stakeholders are involved in the development and implementation of Pain Science Education public messaging campaigns. Furthermore, it is crucial that campaigns are undertaken through a health equity lens, incorporating underrepresented communities to ensure that any intervention does not widen existing health inequalities associated with persistent pain. PERSPECTIVE: Public misconceptions about pain are a significant public health challenge and a viable intervention target to reduce the personal, social, and economic burden of persistent pain. Adaptation of Pain Science Education, which improves misconceptions in a clinical setting, into the public health setting seems a promising approach to explore.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cormac G Ryan
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Centre for Rehabilitation, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, UK
| | - Emma L Karran
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah B Wallwork
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Joshua W Pate
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mary O'Keeffe
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Brona M Fullen
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nick Livadas
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Centre for Rehabilitation, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, UK
| | - Niki Jones
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration
| | - John W Toumbourou
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Deakin University, School of Psychology and Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Geelong, Australia
| | - Peter Gilchrist
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; The University of Adelaide Rural Clinical School, Rural Generalist Program, South Australia
| | - Paul A Cameron
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Fife Health & Social Care Partnership, Scotland, UK; School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK
| | - Francis Fatoye
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK; Lifestyle Disease Entity, North-West University, South Africa
| | - Deepak Ravindran
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Centre for Rehabilitation, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, UK; Department of Pain Medicine, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moseley GL, Pearson N, Reezigt R, Madden VJ, Hutchinson MR, Dunbar M, Beetsma AJ, Leake HB, Moore P, Simons L, Heathcote L, Ryan C, Berryman C, Mardon AK, Wand BM. Considering Precision and Utility When we Talk About Pain. Comment on Cohen et al. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:178-181. [PMID: 36549800 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Graham L Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Neil Pearson
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Roland Reezigt
- School for Physiotherapy, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Victoria J Madden
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Neuroscience Institude, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mark R Hutchinson
- Adelaide Medical School University of Adelaide, Kaurna Country, Adelaide Australia
| | | | - Anneke J Beetsma
- Research group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hayley B Leake
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Laura Simons
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Lauren Heathcote
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cormac Ryan
- Centre for Rehabilitation, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn Berryman
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Amelia K Mardon
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Benedict M Wand
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Caneiro JP, Smith A, Bunzli S, Linton S, Moseley GL, O'Sullivan P. From Fear to Safety: A Roadmap to Recovery From Musculoskeletal Pain. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6480889. [PMID: 34971393 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Contemporary conceptualizations of pain emphasize its protective function. The meaning assigned to pain drives cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses. When pain is threatening and a person lacks control over their pain experience, it can become distressing, self-perpetuating, and disabling. Although the pathway to disability is well established, the pathway to recovery is less researched and understood. This Perspective draws on recent data on the lived experience of people with pain-related fear to discuss both fear and safety-learning processes and their implications for recovery for people living with pain. Recovery is here defined as achievement of control over pain as well as improvement in functional capacity and quality of life. Based on the common-sense model, this Perspective proposes a framework utilizing Cognitive Functional Therapy to promote safety learning. A process is described in which experiential learning combined with "sense making" disrupts a person's unhelpful cognitive representation and behavioral and emotional response to pain, leading them on a journey to recovery. This framework incorporates principles of inhibitory processing that are fundamental to pain-related fear and safety learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Caneiro
- Curtin University, School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Body Logic Physiotherapy Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anne Smith
- Curtin University, School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Samantha Bunzli
- University of Melbourne Department Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Steven Linton
- Örebro University, Center for Health and Medical Psychology (CHAMP), Örebro, Sweden
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Peter O'Sullivan
- Curtin University, School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Body Logic Physiotherapy Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore E, Stanton TR, Traeger A, Moseley GL, Berryman C. Determining the credibility, accuracy and comprehensiveness of websites educating consumers on complex regional pain syndrome accessible in Australia: a systematic review. Aust J Prim Health 2021; 27:485-495. [PMID: 34814978 DOI: 10.1071/py21066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a distressing and disabling pain condition. Many people with CRPS and the health professionals who treat them seek information about the condition via the Internet. The credibility, accuracy and comprehensiveness of online CRPS information remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the credibility, accuracy and comprehensiveness of information presented on freely accessible websites that aim to educate people about CRPS. Keyword searches were conducted on the Australian Google site, with 'trustworthy' websites included and critically appraised. Primary outcomes were recognised metrics of credibility (JAMA benchmark credibility criteria) and website accuracy (according to European CRPS guidelines). Comprehensiveness was assessed using the proportion of European CRPS guidelines covered by the websites. In all, 30 websites with 819 recommendations were critically appraised. Five (17%) websites met all credibility criteria; of the recommendations, 349 (43%) were accurate, 252 (31%) were inaccurate and 218 (26%) were unclear. For comprehensiveness, an average of 17% of general guidelines, 15% of therapeutic guidelines and 6% of medication/supplement guidelines were covered. Online information about CRPS available to Australians has low credibility, accuracy and comprehensiveness. Many website recommendations are inaccurate or unclear, and many websites endorse inappropriate treatments. There is an urgent need for accurate and comprehensive sources of CRPS information online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Moore
- IIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Tasha R Stanton
- IIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Adrian Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Carolyn Berryman
- IIMPACT in Health, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; and South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leake HB, Moseley GL, Stanton TR, O'Hagan ET, Heathcote LC. What do patients value learning about pain? A mixed-methods survey on the relevance of target concepts after pain science education. Pain 2021; 162:2558-2568. [PMID: 33960326 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pain education is a popular treatment approach for persistent pain that involves learning a variety of concepts about pain (ie, target concepts), which is thought to be an important part of recovery. Yet, little is known about what patients value learning about pain. A mixed-methods survey was conducted to identify pain concepts that were valued by people with persistent pain who improved after a pain science education intervention. An online survey was distributed to 123 people who were treated for persistent pain with a pain science education approach; responses of participants who self-identified as "improved" were analysed. Open-ended survey questions were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and close-ended questions were analysed for frequency of responses. Each question-type was analysed separately, before integration for complementarity. We analysed the data of 97 participants. We constructed 3 themes from the open-ended questions. Pain does not mean my body is damaged (theme 1) captured the importance of abandoning preexisting ideas that pain indicated damage. Thoughts, emotions and experiences affect pain (theme 2) captured the value of recognising multifactorial influences on pain. I can retrain my overprotective pain system (theme 3) captured the importance of conceptualising pain as a heightened protective response that could be lessened. Responses from close-ended questions confirmed that the target concepts represented by these themes are among those most valued, although divergence with the qualitative data suggests differences between patient and clinician language. These data offer patient-centred conceptualizations and language that could assist in further refining pain education interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley B Leake
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tasha R Stanton
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Edel T O'Hagan
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lauren C Heathcote
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cashin AG, Lee H, Traeger AC, Moseley GL, Hübscher M, Kamper SJ, Skinner IW, McAuley JH. Producing Clinically Meaningful Reductions in Disability: A Causal Mediation Analysis of a Patient Education Intervention. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2021; 23:236-247. [PMID: 34411745 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Patient education is recommended as first-line care for low back pain (LBP), although its efficacy for providing clinically meaningful reductions in disability has been questioned. One way to improve treatment effects is to identify and improve targeting of treatment mechanisms. We conducted a pre-planned causal mediation analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of patient education for patients with acute LBP. 202 patients who had fewer than six-weeks' duration of LBP and were at high-risk of developing chronic LBP completed two, one-hour treatment sessions of either intensive patient education, or placebo patient education. 189 participants provided data for the outcome self-reported disability at three-months and the mediators, pain self-efficacy, pain catastrophizing, and back beliefs at one-week post treatment. This causal mediation analysis found that pain catastrophizing (mediated effect, -0.64; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], -1.31 to -0.15) and back beliefs (mediated effect, -0.51; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.02) partly explained the effect of patient education on disability but pain self-efficacy did not (mediated effect, -0.40; 95% CI -1.13 to 0.28). Considering the mediator-outcome relationship, patient education would need to induce an 8 point difference on the pain self-efficacy questionnaire (0-60); an 11 point difference on the back beliefs questionnaire (9-45); and a 21 point difference on the pain catastrophizing scale (0-52) to achieve a minimally clinically important difference of 2 points on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (0-24). PERSPECTIVE: Understanding the mechanisms of patient education can inform how this treatment can be adapted to provide clinically meaningful reductions in disability. Our findings suggest that adapting patient education to better target back beliefs and pain self-efficacy could result in clinically meaningful reductions in disability whereas the role of pain catastrophizing in acute LBP is less clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aidan G Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hopin Lee
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Markus Hübscher
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Steven J Kamper
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, NSW, Australia; Centre for Pain, Health and Lifestyle, Australia
| | - Ian W Skinner
- School of Allied Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, Australia
| | - James H McAuley
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Optimizing Long-term Outcomes of Exposure for Chronic Primary Pain from the Lens of Learning Theory. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2021; 22:1315-1327. [PMID: 34029684 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Exposure in vivo is a theory-driven and widely used treatment to tackle functional disability in people with chronic primary pain. Exposure is quite effective; yet, in line with exposure outcomes for anxiety disorders, a number of patients may not profit from it, or relapse. In this focus article, we critically reflect on the current exposure protocols in chronic primary pain, and provide recommendations on how to optimize them. We propose several adaptations that are expected to strengthen inhibitory learning and/or retrieval of the extinction memory, thus likely decreasing relapse. We summarize the limited, but emerging experimental data in the pain domain, and draw parallels with experimental evidence in the anxiety literature. Our reflections and suggestions pertain to the use of the fear hierarchy, reassurance, positive psychology interventions, exposure with a range of stimuli and within different contexts, and the use of safety behaviors during treatment, as well as associating the fear-inducing stimuli with novel outcomes. In addition, we reflect on the importance of specifically tackling (the return of) pain-related avoidance behavior with techniques such as disentangling fear from avoidance and reinforcing approach behaviors. Finally, we discuss challenges in the clinical application of exposure to improve functioning in chronic primary pain and possible avenues for future research. Perspectives: Inspired by recent advances in learning theory and its applications on the treatment of anxiety disorders, we reflect on the delivery of exposure treatment for chronic primary pain and propose strategies to improve its long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ronald Melzack Award Lecture: Putting the brain to work in cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain 2021; 161 Suppl 1:S27-S35. [PMID: 33090737 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
9
|
Aikman K, Burtt L, Ronde OD, Lim DKW, Stratton P, Wong MH, Grainger R, Devan H. Mass media campaigns for chronic pain: a scoping review to inform design of future campaigns. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2020.1832711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelda Aikman
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Lyndie Burtt
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Olivia de Ronde
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Dave K. W. Lim
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Paige Stratton
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Man Hon Wong
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Rebecca Grainger
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Hemakumar Devan
- Centre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR), School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aure O, Kvåle A. Do pain, function, range of motion, fear and distress differ according to symptom duration and work status in patients with low back pain? A cross-sectional study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/21679169.2020.1801834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alice Kvåle
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sharma S, Jensen MP, Moseley GL, Abbott JH. Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026874. [PMID: 30918037 PMCID: PMC6475174 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to: (1) develop pain education materials in Nepali and (2) determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised clinical trial (RCT) of a pain education intervention using these materials in Nepal. DESIGN A two-arm, parallel, assessor-blinded, feasibility RCT. SETTING A rehabilitation hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. PARTICIPANTS Forty Nepalese with non-specific low back pain (mean [SD] age 41 [14] years; 12 [30%] women). INTERVENTIONS Eligible participants were randomised, by concealed, 1:1 allocation, to one of two groups: (1) a pain education intervention and (2) a guideline-based physiotherapy active control group intervention. Each intervention was delivered by a physiotherapist in a single, 1-hour, individualised treatment session. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes were related to feasibility: recruitment, retention and treatment adherence of participants, feasibility and blinding of outcome assessments, fidelity of treatment delivery, credibility of, and satisfaction with, treatment. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 1 week post-treatment. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Pain intensity, pain interference, pain catastrophising, sleep disturbance, resilience, global rating of change, depression and quality of life. Statistical analyses were conducted blind to group allocation. RESULTS Forty participants were recruited. Thirty-eight participants (95%) completed the 1-week post-treatment assessment. Most primary outcomes surpassed the a priori thresholds for feasibility. Several findings have important implications for designing a full trial. Secondary analyses suggest clinical benefit of pain education over the control intervention, with larger decrease in pain intensity (mean difference=3.56 [95% CI 0.21 to 6.91]) and pain catastrophising (mean difference=6.16 [95% CI 0.59 to 11.72]) in the pain education group. Pain intensity would seem an appropriate outcome for a full clinical trial. One minor adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION We conclude that a full RCT of pain education for back pain in Nepal is feasible and warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03387228; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurab Sharma
- Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Bagmati, Nepal
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
| | - Mark P Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - J Haxby Abbott
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Heathcote LC, Pate JW, Park AL, Leake HB, Moseley GL, Kronman CA, Fischer M, Timmers I, Simons LE. Pain neuroscience education on YouTube. PeerJ 2019; 7:e6603. [PMID: 30923652 PMCID: PMC6432903 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Internet in general, and YouTube in particular, is now one of the most popular sources of health-related information. Pain neuroscience education has become a primary tool for managing persistent pain, based in part on the discovery that information about pain can change pain. Our objective was to examine the availability, characteristics, and content of YouTube videos that address the neuroscience of pain. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of videos on YouTube using the search terms "pain education", "what is pain", and "pain brain" in January 2018. Videos were included if they were in English, were under 10 minutes long, and included information on the neuroscience of pain. Videos were coded for (i) descriptive characteristics (e.g., number of views, duration on YouTube), (ii) source and style, (iii) whether or not they addressed seven pre-determined target concepts of pain neuroscience education (e.g., 'Pain is not an accurate marker of tissue state'), and (iv) how engaging they were. RESULTS We found 106 unique videos that met the inclusion criteria. The videos ranged from having four views to over five million views (Mdn = 1,163 views), with the three most highly viewed videos accounting for 75% of the total views. Animated videos were much more highly viewed than non-animated videos. Only a small number of videos had been posted by a clearly-identifiable reputable source such as an academic or medical institution (10%), although a number of videos were posted by healthcare professionals and professional medical societies. For a small number of videos (7%), the source was unclear. We found 17 videos that addressed at least one target concept of pain neuroscience science education, only nine of which were considered to be at least somewhat engaging. The target concept 'Pain is a brain output' was considered to be well addressed by the most videos (N = 11), followed by 'Pain is a protector' (N = 10). We found only one video that adequately addressed all seven target concepts of pain neuroscience education. DISCUSSION YouTube contains a variety of videos that practitioners, patients, and families may view to access pain neuroscience education information. A small portion of these videos addressed one or more target concepts of pain neuroscience education in an engaging manner. It is yet to be determined to what extent patients are able to learn information from these videos, to what extent the videos promote behavior change, and thus to what extent the videos may be useful for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C. Heathcote
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Joshua W. Pate
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna L. Park
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Hayley B. Leake
- School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - G. Lorimer Moseley
- School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Corey A. Kronman
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Molly Fischer
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Inge Timmers
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Laura E. Simons
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|