Effect of cimetidine on portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients

Andrew K. Burroughs: a research hepatologist extraordinaire

Andrew K (Andy) Burroughs passed away in March 2014 at the early age of 60 years. Andy was one of the last of the great all round giants of hepatology. He was a consummate physician, clinical investigator and educator. Over a period of 35 years at the Royal Free Hospital Liver Unit he produced a prodigious quantity of original research and made major contributions in many areas of hepatology including portal hypertension, liver transplantation and chronic liver disease. His work on the methodology of clinical trials is carried on by the Baveno consensus meetings. From bedside clinical mastery to early molecular biology applications to diagnosis and pathology, his contributions left a mark in liver science and advanced medical science in general. He also was praised by his work in medical education particularly in post-graduate mentorship and, an admirable human touch with patients. We will not see his like again.

Safety of acid-suppressing drugs

There is an extensive literature on the adverse effects of drugs that inhibit gastric acid secretion. This study presents a critical examination of interactions between antisecretory drugs and other compounds, the frequency of serious adverse effects relating to various body systems, the safety of antisecretory drugs in pregnancy, and longer-term safety data from postmarketing surveillance studies. While interactions with some other drugs, alcohol, and certain carcinogens are of potential concern, in practice clinically significant reactions appear to be rare if they occur at all. A small number of major side-effects have been documented, but they occur rarely, and postmarketing surveillance has not detected other longer-term sequelae. Safety of these drugs in pregnancy is not established, as data are so few. It is concluded that antisecretory agents, by comparison with most other classes of drugs, are remarkably well tolerated.

Review article: the pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension

The pathogenesis of portal hypertension remains poorly understood. Similarly, pharmacological manipulation for the prevention and treatment of variceal haemorrhage has not fulfilled the promise of the 1980s. This article reviews current concepts in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension and considers pharmacotherapy for the treatment of variceal bleeding.

Review: the pharmacological control of variceal bleeding

The haemodynamic effects and clinical uses of drugs used in the management of patients with oesophageal variceal bleeding are reviewed. Vasoconstrictor agents (vasopressin, teripressin) alone or in combination with nitrates continue to be used for acute bleeding episodes, while somatostatin is an alternative. Alpha- and beta-adrenergic blocking drugs and vasodilators which lead to a sustained decrease in portal pressure can be used for the prevention of bleeding episodes, but despite numerous studies the pharmacological treatment of variceal bleeding remains controversial.

Ranitidine versus cimetidine. A comparison of their potential to cause clinically important drug interactions

The literature on H2-antagonist drug interactions is now extensive. The whole subject is so complicated as to make things difficult for the potential prescriber. However, it is possible to reduce most of the information contained in the literature to a few simple messages. Firstly, H2-antagonists bind to cytochrome P450 and may inhibit the metabolism of drugs eliminated by the mixed function oxygenase system. In this respect, cimetidine has a marked effect which, in most studies, has reached statistical significance. Ranitidine, on the other hand, has a much weaker effect which, even if demonstrable, is statistically non-significant. The potential benefit of ranitidine, however, has to be weighed against the relative costs of the 2 drugs. Secondly, H2-antagonists inhibit gastric acid production and may alter the rate of gastric emptying, and hence the rate of drug absorption. They may also have some effect on portal vein and hepatic artery flow. However, these effects are small and probably not clinically relevant. Thirdly, pharmacodynamic effects of H2-antagonist-drug interactions are difficult to demonstrate in planned studies, and although they are reported from time to time, adverse reactions of consequence are relatively uncommon. Fourthly, the prescriber needs to be aware that cimetidine may produce higher plasma concentrations of some drugs which have a fairly narrow therapeutic range, and this may be clinically important. Examples of drugs for which it may be undesirable to inadvertently increase plasma concentrations include warfarin, theophylline and phenytoin. Finally, for most drugs metabolised by the liver, the risk of an important interaction is small. However, if such an interaction is noted it may be helpful to refer to the other reported cases, and a number of references are included here.

Effect of cimetidine on portal pressure and systemic hemodynamics in patients with and without liver cirrhosis

Portal pressure and systemic hemodynamics were evaluated for 30 minutes after intravenous injection of 400 mg of cimetidine in patients with and without liver cirrhosis when they were operated upon for varying surgical diseases. A transient fall of arterial pressure was seen in both groups of patients, but the change was statistically significant only in those with cirrhosis. Cimetidine did not substantially alter pulse rate, CVP, and portal pressure in both groups. The present results seem to indicate that rapid administration of cimetidine does not induce a fall of portal venous pressure in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

Ranitidine as an inhibitor of liver regeneration

The effects of ranitidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist, on liver regeneration were investigated using a protocol described previously. The animals in Group I had standard two-thirds hepatectomy. In Group II, the rats received an 8 mg/kg intramuscular dose of ranitidine immediately and 24 and 48 hours after two-thirds hepatectomy. In Group III, the rats had the same amounts of ranitidine after a sham operation. Mortality rate, liver weight restoration, mitotic activities of the residual livers, and serum levels of aminotransferases were examined from 24 hours to 14 days after operation. The mortality was very high in Group II (45 percent), whereas no rats died in Group I, and only 1 of 35 animals died in Group III. Administration of ranitidine after hepatectomy resulted in suppression not only of liver restoration, but also of the mitotic activities of hepatocytes. The serum aminotransferase levels in Group II had a tendency to increase after hepatectomy, compared with the levels in Group I. Using light microscopy, we detected that the hepatectomized group treated with ranitidine (Group II) underwent profound liver steatosis and marked dilatation of sinusoidal spaces. The present and previous observations by us indicate that ranitidine also inhibits, like cimetidine, liver regeneration after hepatectomy. The causes of the inhibitory effects of both cimetidine and ranitidine on hepatocyte cell division have also been discussed herein.

The influence of H2-receptor antagonists on steady-state concentrations of propranolol and 4-hydroxypropranolol

Twelve healthy male volunteers were treated with 1200 mg/day cimetidine, 300 mg/day ranitidine, or no H2-receptor antagonist (control) for seven days in a sequence determined by Latin-square design. Each treatment period was separated by a seven-day washout. On the third day of each treatment period, 80 mg propranolol every 12 hours for nine doses was initiated. Whole blood concentrations of propranolol and 4-hydroxypropranolol were measured at 12 time points during the 12-hour period following administration of the last propranolol dose. Heart rate was measured before each blood sample was withdrawn. Cimetidine treatment was associated with a 47 per cent increase in the area under the propranolol concentration-time curve and a 17 per cent increase in elimination half-life of propranolol. Ranitidine had no significant effect on the concentration-time profile of propranolol. There were no significant differences in the 4-hydroxypropranolol pharmacokinetic parameters during any of the treatments. There was, however, a significant decrease in the average 4-hydroxypropranolol-to-propranolol steady-state concentration ratio during the cimetidine treatment. There was no significant difference in heart rate between any of the treatments. The elevation of propranolol concentrations during cimetidine treatment is likely due to metabolic inhibition by cimetidine.

Interactions and non-interactions with ranitidine

At present, there are two H2-receptor antagonists available for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease - cimetidine and ranitidine. Cimetidine is well known to interact with a number of concurrently administered drugs. Like cimetidine, ranitidine binds to cytochrome P-450 in the liver where it appears to exert an inhibitory effect, but to a lesser extent than cimetidine. Both H2-receptor antagonists may also reduce hepatic blood flow. Several drugs which are known to interact with cimetidine have been found not to interact significantly with ranitidine, including propranolol, lignocaine, phenytoin and diazepam. However, significant pharmacokinetic interactions between ranitidine and several other drugs have been established. These interactions may be attributed variously to an effect of ranitidine on hepatic metabolism or to an effect on the absorption of concomitantly administered drugs. For example, the bioavailability of midazolam is significantly increased due to the influence of ranitidine on gastric pH and thus on absorption of midazolam, leading to an increased soporific effect of this benzodiazepine; an effect of ranitidine on oxidative liver metabolism also appears to be a contributory factor in this interaction. Conversely, ranitidine distinctly reduced protein-bound cobalamin absorption from a mean of 7.66% prior to ranitidine administration to 0.84% during treatment with ranitidine 300 mg daily. A significant pharmacokinetic interaction has also been demonstrated between ranitidine and procainamide: the AUC of procainamide increased and the renal clearance fell significantly from a mean of 378 to 309 ml/min with ranitidine co-administration. However, this interaction is due to a different mechanism. In this case, ranitidine appears to compete with procainamide for the common renal proximal tubular secretion site. The reported interactions of ranitidine with warfarin, metoprolol, nifedipine, theophylline and fentanyl appear to be due to inhibition of cytochrome P-450. In a clinical study, warfarin clearance was significantly reduced from 66.7 to 48.7 ml/min by ranitidine, and by cimetidine to 42.9 ml/min. Similarly, the elimination half-lives of metoprolol and nifedipine were distinctly prolonged and the AUCs significantly increased by ranitidine. However, the latter pharmacokinetic interactions appear unlikely to be of clinical significance since the clinical effects of metoprolol and nifedipine were unaffected by ranitidine treatment. In therapeutic concentrations, ranitidine inhibited the disappearance of fentanyl from an in vitro microsomal preparation, indicating that it inhibits microsomal drug metabolism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effect of cimetidine on the hepatic extraction of indocyanine green, the portal pressure and the systemic circulation in patients with cirrhosis of the liver

The effect of cimetidine on hepatic and systemic haemodynamic parameters was studied in seven patients with portal hypertension due to alcohol-induced cirrhosis of the liver and in one patient with peliosis hepatis following oral contraceptive steroids. The intravenous administration of cimetidine (350 mg as bolus, followed by 2 mg/min over 60 min) reduced the hepatic extraction of continuously infused indocyanine green (ICG) by 27%; this was statistically significant (P less than 0.01). Since the ICG clearance, calculated independently of hepatic perfusion, was lowered by 19%, this effect seems to be mainly due to a reduced capacity of the liver to remove the dye from the blood, rather than due to changes in perfusion. Cimetidine did not influence the elevated portal pressure in the patients with cirrhosis, or the normal pressure in the patient with peliosis hepatis. No significant effect was observed on heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary pressure and cardiac output. These studies indicate that the reduction of the hepatic ICG extraction following cimetidine is more the result of an inhibited capacity of the liver to remove the dye than of changes in the hepatic perfusion or in the systemic circulation.

Lack of effect of histamine H2-receptor antagonists on indocyanine green disposition measured by two methods

Eleven healthy male volunteers were treated according to a randomized, crossover design with ranitidine (300 mg/day), cimetidine (1200 mg/day), or nothing for 48 hours. Ninety minutes after the 48-hour dose, each volunteer was given 0.5 mg/kg indocyanine green by iv bolus. Indocyanine green plasma concentrations were measured by the traditional spectrophotometric method at 800 nm and by HPLC simultaneously monitored at 214 and 656 nm. Neither histamine H2-receptor antagonist altered the disposition of indocyanine green. The mean (+/- S.D.) plasma clearance by the spectrophotometric method was 7.48 +/- 2.07 (control), 7.15 +/- 3.07 (ranitidine), and 6.88 +/- 1.35 ml/min/kg (cimetidine). The power to detect a 20 per cent change is 0.87. The spectrophotometric method generally produced a biexponential plasma concentration decay, whereas the HPLC method resulted in a monoexponential decay. Analysis of the 5- to 15-minute data by the conventional technique showed that although indocyanine green total plasma clearance was not significantly different for the two methods (P greater than 0.10), the volume of distribution was significantly greater (P less than 0.001) and the elimination rate constant was significantly smaller (P less than 0.001) for the spectrophotometric than the HPLC method. Although neither ranitidine nor cimetidine chronic administration alters indocyanine green disposition by either method, the absolute values of the pharmacokinetic parameters are dependent upon the analytical technique employed.

Effects of chronic oral cimetidine on apparent liver blood flow and hepatic microsomal enzyme activity in man

Cimetidine 200 mg three times daily and 400 mg at night was given to 10 subjects for four weeks. Apparent liver blood flow was measured by indocyanine green clearance and microsomal enzyme activity by antipyrine clearance, before and after cimetidine. There was no reduction in indocyanine green clearance but antipyrine clearance, as expected, was significantly reduced by 15% at four weeks. Chronic cimetidine treatment does not reduce apparent liver blood flow and is therefore unlikely to be of use in the treatment of portal hypertension. The cimetidine associated hepatic enzyme inhibition appears to persist with prolonged treatment. Therefore patients on chronic cimetidine remain vulnerable to certain drug interactions.

Interference by ranitidine with aldosterone secretion in vivo

The effect of a 3-day oral course of ranitidine on plasma aldosterone level has been studied in 6 normotensive volunteers maintained in a state of sodium depletion. A significant fall in plasma aldosterone (p less than 0.05-0.02), in both the overnight recumbency levels and in the levels obtained during a two hour period of ambulation was observed. The change took place in the absence of variation in plasma renin activity and potassium. Plasma cortisol and prolactin levels were lower after ranitidine at the beginning of the test but their values were not significantly different after ambulation during ranitidine therapy. Ranitidine appears to interfere with aldosterone secretion in vivo.

The effect of ranitidine on the plasma clearance and hepatic extraction of indocyanine green in patients with chronic liver disease

Since hepatic clearance of ICG is reduced by H2-receptor antagonists in normal subjects, it has been suggested that they reduce liver blood flow. We have studied the effect of intravenous ranitidine on ICG clearance in twelve patients with chronic liver disease. Wedged and free hepatic venous pressure were measured before and after intravenous ranitidine in nine of the patients, and the hepatic extraction of ICG was determined in six patients. ICG clearance fell by 22 +/- 11% (s.e. mean) 60 min after ranitidine. In patients in whom ICG clearance fell after intravenous ranitidine the hepatic extraction of ICG was also reduced. There was no significant change in the gradient between wedged and free hepatic venous pressure after ranitidine. It is therefore unlikely that ranitidine lowers liver blood flow.