Interaction and dose equivalence of salbutamol and salmeterol in patients with asthma

Asthma and COPD: A Focus on β-Agonists - Past, Present and Future

Asthma has been recognised as a respiratory disorder for millennia and the focus of targeted drug development for the last 120 years. Asthma is one of the most common chronic non-communicable diseases worldwide. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, is caused by exposure to tobacco smoke and other noxious particles and exerts a substantial economic and social burden. This chapter reviews the development of the treatments of asthma and COPD particularly focussing on the β-agonists, from the isolation of adrenaline, through the development of generations of short- and long-acting β-agonists. It reviews asthma death epidemics, considers the intrinsic efficacy of clinical compounds, and charts the improvement in selectivity and duration of action that has led to our current medications. Important β2-agonist compounds no longer used are considered, including some with additional properties, and how the different pharmacological properties of current β2-agonists underpin their different places in treatment guidelines. Finally, it concludes with a look forward to future developments that could improve the β-agonists still further, including extending their availability to areas of the world with less readily accessible healthcare.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Fluticasone Propionate/Formoterol Fumarate Administered via a Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler and a Novel Breath-Actuated Inhaler in Healthy Volunteers

Introduction: Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate (fluticasone/formoterol) exposures, following administration of Flutiform^® K-haler^®, a breath-actuated inhaler (BAI), were compared with the Flutiform pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with/without spacer in two healthy volunteer studies. In addition, formoterol-induced systemic pharmacodynamic (PD) effects were examined in the second study. Methods: Study 1: single-dose, three-period, crossover pharmacokinetic (PK) study with oral charcoal administration. Fluticasone/formoterol 250/10 μg was administered via BAI, pMDI, or pMDI with spacer (pMDI+S). Pulmonary exposure for BAI was deemed no less than for pMDI (primary comparator) if the lower limit of 94.12% confidence intervals (CIs) for BAI:pMDI maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCt) ratios was ≥80%. Study 2: two-stage adaptive design, both stages being single-dose, crossover without charcoal administration. The PK stage compared fluticasone/formoterol 250/10 μg via BAI, pMDI, or pMDI+S. The primary comparisons were as follows: BAI versus pMDI+S for fluticasone and BAI versus pMDI for formoterol. Systemic safety with BAI was deemed no worse than primary comparator if the upper limit of 94.12% CIs for Cmax and AUCt ratios was ≤125%. PD assessment was to be conducted if BAI safety was not confirmed in the PK stage. Based on PK results, only formoterol PD effects were evaluated. The PD stage compared fluticasone/formoterol 1500/60 μg via BAI, pMDI, or pMDI+S; fluticasone/formoterol 500/20 μg pMDI; and formoterol 60 μg pMDI. The primary endpoint was maximum reduction in serum potassium within 4 hours postdose. Equivalence was defined as 95% CIs for BAI versus pMDI+S and pMDI ratios within 0.5-2.0. Results: Study 1: lower limit of 94.12% CIs for BAI:pMDI ratios >80%. Study 2, PK stage: upper limit of 94.12% CIs for fluticasone (BAI:pMDI+S) ratios <125%; upper limit of 94.12% CIs for formoterol (BAI:pMDI) ratios >125% (for Cmax, not AUCt). Study 2, PD stage: 95% CIs for serum potassium ratios 0.7-1.3 (BAI:pMDI+S) and 0.4-1.5 (BAI:pMDI). Conclusions: Fluticasone/formoterol BAI performance was within the range observed for the pMDI with/without a spacer. Sponsor: Mundipharma Research Ltd. EudraCT 2012-003728-19 (Study 1) and 2013-000045-39 (Study 2).

Salbutamol in the Management of Asthma: A Review

Asthma is a common inflammatory disease of the lungs. The prevalence of asthma is increasing worldwide, and the tendency indicates that the number of asthma sufferers will soar in the coming years for several reasons, in particular, the lifestyles we have adopted that expose us to risk factors. Salbutamol is the first selective short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) used as an alternative reliever in the treatment of asthma. Its therapeutic effect is based on its potent smooth muscle relaxant properties, which allow the inhibition of bronchial smooth muscle contraction and subsequent bronchodilation. Salbutamol can be administered orally, intravenously (IV), intramuscularly (IM), subcutaneously, or by inhalation. For this reason, the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters-absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination-are highly diverse and, consequently, the efficacy and adverse effects also differ between each formulation. Here, we review the pharmacological profile of different salbutamol formulations, focusing on their efficacy and adverse effects for its original application, asthma.

Detection and pharmacokinetics of salmeterol in thoroughbred horses following inhaled administration

Salmeterol is a man-made beta-2-adrenergic receptor agonist used to relieve bronchospasm associated with inflammatory airway disease in horses. Whilst judicious use is appropriate in horses in training, they cannot race with clinically effective concentrations of medications under the British Horseracing Authority's Rules of Racing. Salmeterol must therefore be withdrawn prior to race day and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies used to establish formal detection time advice. Salmeterol xinafoate (Serevent Evohaler^® ) was administered (0.1 mg twice daily for 4.5 days) via inhalation to six horses. Urine and blood samples were taken up to 103 h postadministration. Hydrolysed samples were extracted using solid phase extraction. A sensitive Ultra high performance tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed, with a Lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for salmeterol of 10 pg/mL in both matrices. The majority of salmeterol plasma concentrations, postlast administration, were below the method LLOQ and so unusable for PK analysis. Urine PK analysis suggested a half-life consistent with duration of pharmacological effect. Average estimated urine concentration at steady-state was obtained via PK modelling and used to estimate a urine concentration of 59 ± 34 pg/mL as a marker of effective lung concentration. From this, potential detection times were calculated using a range of safety factors.

Tremor and β(2)-adrenergic agents: is it a real clinical problem?

Tremor is one of the most characteristic adverse effects following administration of β(2)-adrenergic agonists. It is reported by around 2-4% of patients with asthma taking a regular β(2)-adrenergic agonist and is induced by both short-acting and long-acting agents. Tremor associated with β(2)-adrenergic agonists is dose-related and may occur more commonly with oral dosing. The exact mechanism for tremor induction by β(2)-adrenergic agonists is still unknown, but there is some evidence that β(2)-adrenergic agonists act directly on muscle. An early explanation of the tremor was that β(2)-adrenoceptor stimulation shortens the active state of skeletal muscle, which leads to incomplete fusion and reduced tension of tetanic contractions. More recently, tremor has been correlated closely with hypokalaemia. A possible diverse impact of different modes of administration of β(2)-adrenergic agonists on tremorogenic responses has been suggested but solid evidence is still lacking. In any case, the desensitization of β(2)-adrenoceptors that occurs during the first few days of regular use of a β(2)-adrenergic agonist accounts for the commonly observed resolution of tremor after the first few doses. Therefore, tremor is not a really important adverse effect in patients under regular treatment with a β(2)-adrenergic agonist.

Effect of montelukast or salmeterol added to inhaled fluticasone on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of montelukast, 5 mg, or inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg, added to inhaled fluticasone in reducing the maximum percentage decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) after a standardized exercise challenge and response to rescue bronchodilation with albuterol in children aged 6 to 14 years with persistent asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, 2-period, 4-week, crossover study conducted between December 22, 2005 and November 14, 2008 at 30 centers in Europe, Asia, Mexico, and South America. Patients with asthma receiving inhaled corticosteroids demonstrated an FEV1 of 70% or higher of the predicted value and EIB (defined as a decrease in FEV1 > or = 15% compared with preexercise baseline FEV1 on 2 occasions before randomization). Standardized exercise challenges were performed at baseline (prerandomization) and at the end of each active treatment period.

RESULTS

Of 154 patients randomized, 145 completed the study. Montelukast, compared with salmeterol, significantly reduced the mean maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 (10.6% vs 13.8%; P = .009), mean area under the curve for the first 20 minutes after exercise (116.0% x min vs 168.8% x min; P = .006), and median time to recovery (6.0 vs 11.1 minutes; P = .04). Response to albuterol rescue after exercise challenge was significantly greater (P < .001) with montelukast. Montelukast and salmeterol were generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Attenuation and response of EIB to albuterol rescue after exercise challenge were significantly better with montelukast than with salmeterol after 4 weeks of treatment.

Beta-Adrenergic Agonists

Inhaled β₂-adrenoceptor (β₂-AR) agonists are considered essential bronchodilator drugs in the treatment of bronchial asthma, both as symptoms-relievers and, in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, as disease-controllers. In this article, we first review the basic mechanisms by which the β₂-adrenergic system contributes to the control of airway smooth muscle tone. Then, we go on describing the structural characteristics of β₂-AR and the molecular basis of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling and mechanisms of its desensitization/ dysfunction. In particular, phosphorylation mediated by protein kinase A and β-adrenergic receptor kinase are examined in detail. Finally, we discuss the pivotal role of inhaled β₂-AR agonists in the treatment of asthma and the concerns about their safety that have been recently raised.

A novel breath-actuated integrated vortex spacer device increases relative lung bioavailability of fluticasone/salmeterol in combination

BACKGROUND

Spacer devices facilitate respirable drug delivery. A novel breath-actuated antistatic spacer with integrated vortex chamber (Synchro-Breathe) device has been developed, which is compact,portable and user friendly as compared to conventional spacers which are bulky and cumbersome. The relative bioavailability to the lung of inhaled fluticasone and salmeterol combination is primarily dependent on respirable dose delivery and can be reliably quantified using adrenal suppression and early fall in serum potassium (marker of systemic beta-2 adrenoreceptor response) as surrogate markers for delivered lung dose.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the in vivo relative bioavailability to the lung of Hydrofluoroalkane(HFA) Seretide delivered via Synchro-Breathe (SB); an optimally prepared 750 ml large volume plastic spacer, Volumatic (VM); and conventional Evohaler pMDI (EH).

METHODS

Nineteen healthy volunteers completed the study using a randomised double blind, double dummy crossover design. Single doses of placebo or Seretide HFA 250 (total dose ex-valve: fluticasone 2000 mcg/salmeterol 200 mcg) were administered via SB, VM and EH. Overnight urinary cortisol creatinine (OUCC) and serum potassium (K) were measured at baseline and after each dose as systemic surrogates of relative respirable dose delivery for the fluticasone and salmeterol moieties, respectively.

RESULTS

Significant suppression of OUCC and K occurred from baseline with SB and VM but not EH devices(geometric mean fold suppression, 95% CI, p and arithmetic mean fall mmol/L, 95% CI, respectively); EH:1.51(0.43-1.01), p 1/4 0.06; VM: 2.52(1.57-4.04), p < 0.001; SB: 2.66(1.57-4.49), p < 0.001(equating to 33.8%,60.2% and 62.3% falls, respectively). For K, the falls for EH were 0.09(0.25 to 0.07), p 1/4 0.69; VM: 0.27(0.46 to 0.08), p 1/4 0.003; SB: 0.32(0.53 to 0.11), p 1/4 0.002 (equating to 2.2%, 6.8%, and 8.06% fall,respectively). There were no significant differences between SB and VM.

CONCLUSION

The breath-actuated Synchro-Breathe device was comparable to an optimally prepared Volumatic spacer, and resulted in commensurate improvement in relative lung bioavailability for both fluticasone and salmeterol moieties compared to pMDI.

Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic asthma in adults and children where background therapy contains varied or no inhaled corticosteroid

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists (LABA) were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS). In this updated review we have included studies in which patients were either not on ICS as a group, or in which some patients, but not all, were on ICS to complement previous systematic reviews of studies where LABA was given in patients uniformly receiving ICS. We have focussed particularly on serious adverse events, given previous concerns about potential risks, especially of death, from regular beta-2 agonist use.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of LABA compared with placebo, in mixed populations in which only some were taking ICS and in populations not using ICS therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2005. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least four weeks duration, comparing a LABA given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma. Selection criteria to this updated review have been altered to accommodate recently published Cochrane reviews on combination and addition of LABA to ICS therapy. Studies in which all individuals were uniformly taking ICS were excluded from this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies (representing 68 experimental comparisons) randomising 42,333 participants met the inclusion criteria. Salmeterol was used as long-acting agent in 50 studies and formoterol fumarate in 17. The treatment period was four to nine weeks in 29 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 38 studies. Twenty-four studies did not permit the use of ICS, and forty permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones (in three studies this was unclear). In these studies between 22% and 92% were taking ICS, with a median of 62%. There were significant advantages to LABA treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF and FEV1. They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. This was true whether patients were taking LABA in combination with ICS or not. Findings from SMART (a recently published surveillance study) indicated significant increases in asthma related deaths, respiratory related deaths and combined asthma related deaths and life threatening experiences. The absolute increase in asthma-related mortality was consistent with an increase of around one per 1250 patients treated with LABA for six months, but the confidence intervals are wide (from 700 to 10,000). Post-hoc exploratory subgroups suggested that African-Americans and those not on inhaled corticosteroids were at particular risk for the primary end-point of death or life-threatening asthma event. There was also a suggestion of an increase in exacerbation rate in children. Pharmacologically predicted side effects such as headache, throat irritation, tremor and nervousness were more frequent with LABA treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

LABA are effective in the control of chronic asthma in the "real-life" subject groups included. However there are potential safety issues which call into question the safety of LABA, particularly in those asthmatics who are not taking ICS, and it is not clear why African-Americans were found to have significant differences in comparison to Caucasians for combined respiratory-related death and life threatening experiences, but not for asthma-related death.

Literature review and pilot studies of the effect of QT correction formulas on reported beta2-agonist-induced QTc prolongation

BACKGROUND

Drugs that stimulate the beta2-adrenergic receptor have been reported to prolong the QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc interval), a potential mechanism for cardiac toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated whether beta2-adrenergic agonist drugs prolong the QTc interval when different correction formulas for the effect of heart rate are used.

METHODS

Healthy subjects of both sexes aged 19 to 33 years were recruited with advertisements. In pilot studies, subjects took a preparation containing the beta2-agonist ephedrine, or they participated in a postural study of the effect of endogenous beta-agonists. The study-drug group took 3 pills of the ephedra preparation per day for 2 days and then 6 pills per day for the next 2 days. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded before and at 1, 3, and 82 hours after the first study-drug dose and both before and after standing in the standing-up group. QT intervals obtained by automatic measurement were corrected for heart rate with 3 formulas: Bazett (QTc[B]), Framingham (QTc[F]), and Fridericia (QTc[Fr]). For the literature review, PubMed was searched using the search terms beta2-agonist drugs, QT, QTc, EKG, ECG, or electrocardiogram for studies that reported prolongation of the QTc by beta2-agonist drugs. We analyzed the method by which 11 different studies corrected QT interval for heart rate after the use of formoterol, salmeterol, terbutaline, salbutamol, and fenoterol.

RESULTS

The ephedra study included 20 healthy subjects (35% men; mean [SD] age, 25 [4] years). Two hours after the last dose, QTc[B] had increased significantly from baseline by 19 ms (P=0.02). QTc[F] and QTc[Fr] did not change significantly. In the postural study, 19 healthy subjects (68% men; mean [SD] age, 32 [8] years) stood up and QTc[B] increased by a mean (SD) of 8 (15) ms (P=0.03). In these subjects, the QTc[B]/RR regression slope was significantly different from 0 (r=0.60, P=0.002), and the Bazett formula did not eliminate the dependence of QTc on heart rate. However, QTc[F] and QTc[Fr] did not change significantly, meaning that these formulas eliminated the dependence of QTc on heart rate. Eleven publications reported prolongation of QTc[B] by 5 beta2-adrenergic agonists for asthma. The change in QTc[B] interval from these publications was still dependent on the change in heart rate (r=0.63, P=0.004), but this dependence was eliminated after using QTc[F] and QTc[Fr]. The increase in QTc[B] would have been up to 30 ms less if QTc[F] or QTc[Fr] had been reported instead.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bazett correction is the one typically reported by computerized ECG machines and the medical literature. This review suggests that QTc[B] may overestimate QTc when heart rate increases. Because the beta2-adrenergic agonist drugs increase heart rate, a systematic bias may have implicated these drugs in prolongation of cardiac repolarization. Prospective, large studies with a placebo and active control group are needed to evaluate the effect of beta2 agonists on QTc using formulas other than Bazett.

Safety of formoterol after cumulative dosing via Easyhaler and Aerolizer

This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, cumulative dose, multicentre crossover study aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority in safety of formoterol delivered via Easyhaler versus Aerolizer. The secondary objective was to compare the efficacy of the devices. Thirty-three adult asthmatic subjects entered the study and 32 completed it. The study comprised screening and two study days, with each subject inhaling 96 microg (12, 12, 24 and 48 microg) cumulative dose of formoterol via the study inhalers. Serum potassium (S-K+), vital signs and spirometry were performed at baseline, 1h after each dose and additionally 4h after the last dose. The primary safety variable was S-K+. Secondary safety variables were heart rate, corrected QT interval, blood pressure, serum glucose and adverse events. Spirometry was assessed to evaluate efficacy. The results showed non-inferiority in safety of formoterol inhaled via Easyhaler compared to Aerolizer. The adjusted treatment difference in the S-K+ values after 96 microg cumulative dose of formoterol was 0.14 mmol/L being clearly above the pre-determined lower limit of the non-inferiority criterion of -0.2 mmol/L. There were dose-related changes in secondary efficacy variables after both treatments. The changes were comparable in most of the parameters but heart rate was statistically significantly higher and decrease in diastolic blood pressure greater after formoterol via Aerolizer than that via Easyhaler. The occurrence of adverse events was dose-related, the most common events being tremor, hypokalaemia, headache and palpitation. The spirometry results showed no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the treatments. In conclusion, formoterol delivered via Easyhaler was as safe as via Aerolizer.

A benefit-risk assessment of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists in the management of obstructive pulmonary disease

The two inhaled long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, have been studied extensively since their introduction in the early 1990s. In this review we consider the evidence for their efficacy and safety in adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), by reviewing long-term prospective studies in which these drugs have been compared with placebo or an alternative bronchodilator. We have also assessed safety, including data from postmarketing surveillance studies and case-control studies using large databases. In patients with asthma, salmeterol and formoterol increase lung function, reduce asthmatic symptoms and improve quality of life when compared with placebo. Both drugs protect against exercise-induced asthma, although some tolerance develops with regular use. Tolerance to the bronchodilator effects of formoterol has also been seen, although this is small and most of the beneficial effects are maintained long-term. Both drugs have been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations but only in studies in which most patients were taking an inhaled corticosteroid. Adding a long-acting beta2-agonist provided better control than increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroid in several studies. Long-acting beta2-agonists also provide better asthma control than use of regular short-acting beta2-agonists and theophylline. Their relative efficacy compared with leukotriene antagonists is uncertain as yet. Formoterol appears to be at least as safe and effective as a short-acting beta2-agonist when used on an 'as required' basis. In patients with COPD, both salmeterol and formoterol offer improved lung function and reduced COPD symptoms compared with placebo, and quality of life has been improved in some studies. Some tolerance to the bronchodilating effect of salmeterol was seen in one study. Most studies have not found a significant reduction in exacerbations in COPD. Both drugs have provided greater benefit than ipratropium bromide or theophylline; there are limited data on tiotropium bromide. The long-acting beta2-agonists cause predictable adverse effects including headache, tremor, palpitations, muscle cramps and a fall in serum potassium concentration. Salmeterol can also cause paradoxical bronchospasm. There is some evidence that serious adverse events including dysrhythmias and life-threatening asthma episodes can occur; however, the incidence of such events is very low but may be increased in patients not taking an inhaled corticosteroid. Salmeterol 50 microg twice daily and formoterol 12 microg twice daily are effective and safe in treating patients with asthma and COPD. Higher doses cause more adverse effects, although serious adverse events are rare.

Effect of salmeterol xinafoate on lung mucociliary clearance in patients with asthma

Lung mucociliary clearance is impaired in stable asthma. The long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol has been shown in vitro to cause a significant increase in ciliary beat frequency. It seemed possible therefore that salmeterol may also have a favourable effect on lung mucociliary transport in asthmatic patients. Fourteen patients with asthma participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study to assess the effect of 2 weeks of treatment with salmeterol MDI (50 microg b.d.) on lung mucociliary clearance. The 11 patients who completed the study (seven males, four females) had a mean +/- SE age of 50 +/- 4 years, % predicted FEV1 of 74 +/- 8% and a tobacco consumption history of 13 +/- 7 pack-years (seven non-smokers, four exsmokers). Lung mucociliary transport was measured by a radioaerosol technique. Pulmonary function indices (FEV1, FVC, and PEF) were significantly improved on salmeterol relative to placebo. The main radioaerosol finding was a significant increase in the penetration of radioaerosol into the lung with 24-h radioaerosol rising from 40 +/- 5% on placebo to 49 +/- 4% (P < 0.01) on salmeterol. Despite this increased penetration, a slight favourable change occurred in tracheobronchial aerosol clearance. This study demonstrates that 2 weeks salmeterol treatment influences deposition of particles within the lung by increasing airway patency and indicates a beneficial effect of MDI salmeterol on lung mucociliary clearance.

Inhaled long acting beta agonists for stable chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS).

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of long acting inhaled beta-2 agonists compared with placebo.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2002. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least two weeks duration, comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty five studies met the inclusion criteria, 56 parallel group and 29 cross over design. Salmeterol xinafoate was used as long acting agent in 60 studies and formoterol fumarate in 25. The treatment period was two to four weeks in 32 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 53 studies. 34 study groups used concurrent inhaled corticosteroid treatment, 21 studies did not permit their use and 35 permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones. There were significant advantages to long acting beta-2 agonist treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (weighted mean difference (WMD) 26.78 L/min 95%CI 20.36 to 33.20), evening PEF (WMD 19.17 L/min 95%CI 11.63 to 26.73). They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. The risk of exacerbation was lower in adults using regular inhaled corticosteroids.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Long acting beta-2 agonists are effective in the control of chronic asthma, and the evidence supports their use in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, as emphasised in current guidelines. Further research is needed on their use in children under 12 and in mild asthmatics not taking ICS.

Beta-adrenoceptor agonists and asthma--100 years of development

Inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists are by far the most effective and safe bronchodilators currently available. They have not been surpassed by any other bronchodilating principle. The way to this position has been long and started with the first successful treatment of acute, severe asthma with s.c. injections of adrenaline 100 years ago. Over the years, synthetic congeners of adrenaline have been produced and tested for their pharmacological properties. During the first decades, little attention was given airway smooth muscle. The discovery of isoprenaline in 1940 was the first major step towards selective bronchodilation. This compound became a key tool for the classification of adrenoceptors into alpha and beta. Salbutamol and terbutaline were the first to show a significant attenuation of the cardiostimulant effect and confirmed the subdivision of beta-adrenoceptors into beta(1) and beta(2). Much effort was made to eliminate the next dose-limiting side effect, skeletal muscle tremor but in vain. Prolonged duration of action was achieved in three ways: with bambuterol, an orally active carbamate ester prodrug of terbutaline, salmeterol, an inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist emerging from a purposeful research project, and formoterol which was found, accidentally, to have a long duration of action when inhaled. Throughout the 20th century, beta-adrenoceptor agonists have been developed and marketed as racemates. The pharmacological activity usually resides in the (R)-enantiomer. Despite claims for the opposite, there is so far no compelling evidence that the presence of the less active (S)-enantiomer is of any harm to the patient. One hundred years of experience of structural modifications of adrenaline has shown that the possibilities to modify the properties of this endogenous prototype appear to be unlimited.

Regular treatment with long acting beta agonists versus daily regular treatment with short acting beta agonists in adults and children with stable asthma

BACKGROUND

Selective beta-adrenergic agonists for use in asthma are: short acting (2-6 hours) and long acting (>12 hours). There has been little controversy about using short acting beta-agonists intermittently, but long acting beta-agonists are used regularly, and their regular use has been controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefit or detriment of treatment with regular short- or long acting inhaled beta-agonists in chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out using the Cochrane Airways Group register. Bibliographies of identified RCTs were searched for additional relevant RCTs. Authors of identified RCTs were contacted for other published and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised studies of at least two weeks duration, comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist given twice daily with any short acting inhaled beta-agonist of equivalent bronchodilator effectiveness given regularly in chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. Authors of studies were contacted for missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

31 studies met the inclusion criteria, 24 of parallel group and 7 cross over design. Salmeterol xinafoate was used as long acting agent in 22 studies and formoterol fumarate in 9. Salbutamol was the short acting agent used in 27 studies and terbutaline in 5. The treatment period was over 2 weeks in 29 studies, and at least 12 weeks in 20. 25 studies permitted a variety of co-intervention treatments, usually inhaled corticosteroid or cromones. One study did not permit inhaled corticosteroid. Long acting beta-agonists were significantly better than short acting for a variety of lung function measurements including morning PEF (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 33 l/min 95% CI 25, 42) or evening PEF (WMD 26 l/min 95% CI 18, 33); and had significantly lower scores for day and night time asthma symptom scores and percentage of days and nights without symptoms. They were also associated with a significantly lower use of rescue medication both during the day and night. Risk of exacerbations was not different between the two types of agent, but most studies were of short duration which limits the power to test for such differences.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Long acting inhaled beta-agonists have advantages across a wide range of physiological and clinical outcomes for regular treatment.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the role of salmeterol in the in-hospital management of asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate as an adjunct to conventional therapy for the in-hospital management of acute asthma.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Medical wards of a large university-based hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-three patients admitted for an acute exacerbation of asthma.

INTERVENTIONS

Salmeterol (42 microg) or two puffs of placebo every 12 h in addition to standard therapy (short-acting beta-agonists, corticosteroids, and anticholinergic agents).

RESULTS

No clinically adverse effects were seen with the addition of salmeterol to conventional therapy. After salmeterol, there was no difference in pulse, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, severity of symptoms, or dyspnea score. Patients receiving salmeterol had greater FEV(1) percent improvements than the placebo group at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. These findings were not statistically significant. By paired Student's t tests, there were significant improvements in FEV(1) (p = 0.03) and FVC (p = 0.03) in the salmeterol group after 48 h of treatment with no comparable improvement in the placebo group. In a subgroup analysis of patients with an initial FEV(1) < or = 1.5 L, the absolute FEV(1) percent improvement for salmeterol vs placebo was 51% vs 16% at 24 h and 54% vs 40% at 48 h. The relative FEV(1) percent improvement for salmeterol vs placebo was 17% vs 8% at 24 h and 18% vs 14% at 48 h.

CONCLUSION

The addition of salmeterol to conventional therapy is safe and may benefit hospitalized patients with asthma. Further studies are needed to clarify its role in the treatment of acute exacerbation of asthma.

Systemic effects of formoterol and salmeterol: a dose-response comparison in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

The main adverse effects of inhaled long acting beta(2) agonists relate to their systemic activity. The systemic effects seen over eight hours after inhalation of three doses of salmeterol and formoterol were therefore compared in normal subjects.

METHODS

A double blind, randomised, crossover study was carried out in 16 healthy subjects who inhaled formoterol 24, 48 and 96 microg (via Turbuhaler((R))), salmeterol 100, 200 and 400 microg (via Diskhaler((R))), or placebo on separate days. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and plasma potassium and glucose concentrations were measured for eight hours following each drug and mean values were used to plot the time course of change after each dose. Mean maximum (or minimum) absolute values were used to construct dose-response curves to calculate the relative dose potency of the two drugs. Lunch was taken after the four hour readings and, since this caused additional changes to the main outcome measures, data from the first four hours are also presented in a post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Both salmeterol and formoterol caused an early dose dependent increase in heart rate and glucose concentrations and a fall in diastolic blood pressure and plasma potassium concentration; formoterol also caused an early increase in systolic blood pressure. The cardiovascular effects occurred more rapidly than the metabolic effects and the response to formoterol was faster than that of salmeterol, apart from the glycaemic response. The effects of salmeterol were slightly more prolonged than those of formoterol, although some dose related effects were apparent at eight hours with both drugs. The relative dose potency for formoterol compared with salmeterol at four and eight hours for the different end points excluding systolic blood pressure ranged from 1.6 to 7.0 after adjusting for baseline values. Relative dose potencies (95% CI) for maximum heart rate and plasma potassium concentrations were 4.1 (3.0 to 5.6) and 5.8 (4.1 to 8.6) over four hours and 2.4 (1.2 to 3.8) and 3.0 (1.2 to 5.7) over eight hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Formoterol and salmeterol cause dose related changes in heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and plasma glucose and potassium concentrations. Formoterol has a more rapid onset for most end points whereas salmeterol has slightly more prolonged activity. Both drugs have a relatively modest therapeutic window. The relative dose potencies of the two drugs for the main end points were similar to the fourfold difference in recommended doses. Some differences in the pharmacological profile of the two drugs emerged and are as yet unexplained.

Oral montelukast compared with inhaled salmeterol to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. A randomized, double-blind trial. Exercise Study Group

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, an oral, once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, provides protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 8 weeks of therapy with salmeterol aerosol or montelukast on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in adults with asthma.

DESIGN

8-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.

SETTING

17 asthma treatment centers in the United States.

PATIENTS

191 adults with asthma who had documented exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

INTERVENTION

Qualified patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with montelukast (10 mg once in the evening) or salmeterol (50 microg [2 puffs] twice daily).

MEASUREMENTS

Changes in pre-exercise and postexercise challenge values; percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1; the area above the FEV1-time curve; and time to recovery of FEV1 at days 1 to 3, week 4, and week 8 of treatment.

RESULTS

By day 3, similar and statistically significant reductions in maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 were seen with both therapies. Sustained improvement occurred in the montelukast group at weeks 4 and 8; at these time points, the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol decreased significantly. At week 8, the percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 was 57.2% in the montelukast group and 33.0% in the salmeterol group (P = 0.002). By week 8, 67% of patients receiving montelukast and 46% of patients receiving salmeterol had a maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 of less than 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchoprotective effect of montelukast was maintained throughout 8 weeks of study. In contrast, significant loss of bronchoprotection at weeks 4 and 8 was seen with salmeterol. Long-term administration of montelukast provided consistent inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction at the end of the 8-week dosing interval without tolerance.

Comparison of the relative efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients

Studies performed on airway smooth muscle in vitro have indicated that salmeterol is a partial agonist on the beta2-receptor in comparison to formoterol. In the present study we evaluated whether these pharmacological differences between salmeterol and formoterol also are applicable to asthmatic patients. The protective effects by increasing cumulative doses of formoterol (12, 60, 120 micrograms) and salmeterol (50, 250, 500 micrograms) on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction were evaluated in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled design. Patients were regularly treated with salbutamol 200 micrograms twice daily during the study period, to avoid variability in beta2-adrenoceptor tolerance. S-potassium, heart rate corrected Q-T interval (Q-Tc), and tremor score were followed as measures of systemic effects. Formoterol dose-dependently protected against methacholine responsiveness (4.6 doubling doses after 120 micrograms). Salmeterol, however, showed a flatter dose-response curve, and a significantly weaker maximal protective effect (2.8 doubling doses after 250 micrograms). Formoterol caused a significantly higher tremor score and a larger drop in S-potassium than salmeterol at the highest doses. These data show that salmeterol is a partial agonist on the beta2-receptor in relation to formoterol in human airways in vivo. Further studies are required to document the clinical consequences of this finding, for example in severe asthmatic patients.

Buteyko breathing techniques in asthma: a blinded randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of Buteyko breathing techniques (BBT) in the management of asthma.

DESIGN

Prospective, blinded, randomised study comparing the effect of BBT with control classes in 39 subjects with asthma. The study was conducted from January 1995 to April 1995.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Subjects recruited from the community, aged 12 to 70 years, with asthma and substantial medication use.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Medication use; morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); end-tidal (ET) CO2; resting minute volume (MV); and quality of life (QOL) score, measured at three months.

RESULTS

No change in daily PEF or FEV1 was noted in either group. At three months, the BBT group had a median reduction in daily beta 2-agonist dose of 904 micrograms (range, 29 micrograms to 3129 micrograms), whereas the control group had a median reduction of 57 micrograms (range, -2343 micrograms to 1143 micrograms) (P = 0.002). Daily inhaled steroid dose fell 49% (range, -100% to 150%) for the BBT group and 0 (range, -82% to +100%) for the control group (P = 0.06). A trend towards greater improvement in QOL score was noted for BBT subjects (P = 0.09). Initial MV was high and similar in both groups; by three months, MV was lower in the BBT group than in the control group (P = 0.004). ET CO2 was low in both groups and did not change with treatment.

CONCLUSION

Those practising BBT reduced hyperventilation and their use of beta 2-agonists. A trend toward reduced inhaled steroid use and better quality of life was observed in these patients without objective changes in measures of airway calibre.

Long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists in asthma therapy

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology of the long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, summarize results of their clinical trials, evaluate their safety records, and discuss their roles in the treatment of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Preclinical and clinical studies involving salmeterol or formoterol were identified by a MEDLINE search, weekly computerized literature updates, and manual searches. Studies of satisfactory quality were chosen for review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Salmeterol and formoterol are potent and selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonists with durations of action >12 h. Their major differences are that formoterol has a rapid onset of action and is a partial agonist of high intrinsic efficacy, whereas salmeterol has a delayed onset and is a partial agonist of low intrinsic efficacy. Twice daily use of either drug results in improved lung function, reduced symptoms, and a better quality of life. These agents protect against exercise-induced asthma for 12 h and eliminate nighttime awakening in most patients. Limited tolerance develops, especially to their bronchoprotective effects, but their improvement of lung function is sustained.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of salmeterol or formoterol provides subjective and objective amelioration of asthma in patients experiencing excessive symptoms or physiologic impairment despite the regular administration of low doses of inhaled corticosteroids (equivalent to approximately 500 microg/d of beclomethasone). Intermittent use of either long-acting beta2-agonist can provide prolonged protection against exercise-induced asthma or nighttime symptoms. Patients should be instructed to continue taking inhaled steroids when long-acting beta2-agonists are administered on a regular schedule and to not take long-acting beta2-agonists between regularly scheduled doses. Used properly, they are effective and safe adjunctive agents in the treatment of asthma.

Dose equivalence and bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol and salbutamol in asthma

BACKGROUND

Salbutamol is the most widely prescribed short acting beta 2 agonist and salmeterol is the first long acting inhaled beta 2 agonist. The dose equivalence of salmeterol and salbutamol is disputed. Estimates of weight-for-weight dose ratio have ranged from 1:2 to 1:16. A study was undertaken to clarify the true dose ratio.

METHODS

The bronchoprotection afforded against repeated methacholine challenge by inhaled salmeterol 25 micrograms and 100 micrograms and salbutamol 100 micrograms and 400 micrograms was compared in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial. Subjects were 16 stable asthmatics with a baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 65% predicted, screening concentration provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% (PC20FEV1) of < or = 8mg/ml, and a shift in PC20FEV1 of more than two doubling concentration steps following inhalation of salbutamol 400 micrograms. On five separate occasions subjects underwent methacholine challenge before and 30 and 120 minutes after drug administration. PD20FEV1 was calculated for each challenge. FEV1 at 90 minutes after drug administration was also recorded.

RESULTS

Bronchoprotection afforded by salmeterol was increased at 120 minutes compared with 30 minutes and protection by salbutamol was decreased. Protection by both doses of salmeterol was similar to salbutamol 100 micrograms at 30 minutes but significantly greater at 120 minutes. FEV1 at 90 minutes was significantly greater after salmeterol 100 micrograms than after placebo, but there were no other significant differences between treatments. Maximal observed protection was equivalent for salmeterol 100 micrograms and salbutamol 400 micrograms.

CONCLUSIONS

The data are compatible with a weight-for-weight dose ratio for salmeterol:salbutamol of < or = 1:4.

Time course and relative dose potency of systemic effects from salmeterol and salbutamol in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

The main adverse effects of beta 1 agonists relate to their systemic activity. The time course and dose response relations of the systemic effects of salmeterol compared with salbutamol were investigated.

METHODS

A double blind, randomised, crossover study was carried out in 14 healthy subjects who attended on seven days. Heart rate, QTc interval, blood pressure, plasma potassium and glucose concentrations were measured for four hours following inhaled placebo, salmeterol 100, 200 and 400 micrograms and salbutamol 600, 1200 and 2400 micrograms given by metered dose inhaler. Maximum changes from baseline and maximum absolute values following each dose of treatment were used to construct log dose response curves and calculate relative dose potency.

RESULTS

Both salmeterol and salbutamol caused dose dependent changes in heart rate, QTc interval, and plasma potassium and glucose concentrations. The onset of cardiac effects was rapid following both drugs, whereas changes in glucose and potassium concentrations occurred more gradually with salmeterol. The increase in heart rate and fall in potassium level were sustained over the four hours whereas glucose levels gradually returned towards baseline. The relative dose potency of salmeterol compared with salbutamol for changes from baseline was 7.1 (95% CI 3.9 to 14.4) for the QTc interval and 8.2 (95% CI 5.7 to 12.6) for plasma potassium concentration. Salmeterol caused steeper dose response curves for heart rate and plasma glucose concentration than salbutamol so relative dose potency values could not be calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support previous data that salmeterol 100 micrograms is broadly equivalent to salbutamol 800 micrograms for systemic effects. The greater systemic effects of salmeterol are most likely to be due to greater potency relative to dose, although it may also have greater systemic bioavailability. The steeper dose response curve for heart rate with salmeterol indicates that it has a narrower therapeutic window than salbutamol and thus should be prescribed at the lowest effective dose.

Dose-response of inhaled drugs in asthma. An update

The demographic characteristics of patients used in clinical trials (such as the severity of airway obstruction) can significantly influence the results of dose-response studies, emphasising the need to evaluate effects on the steep part of the dose-response curve. Differences in inhaler devices can also influence study outcomes, as for inhaled drugs both airway efficacy and adverse effect profiles are primarily determined by lung deposition and hence bioavailability. Dose-response studies with short- and long-acting beta 2-agonists show an excellent therapeutic ratio at conventional doses used in everyday clinical practice (i.e. 2 to 4 puffs). Dose-related systemic effects of beta 2-agonist occur at higher doses, for salbutamol (albuterol) > 500 micrograms. Fenoterol is a beta 2-agonists with higher intrinsic activity than salbutamol and produces greater systemic effects at higher than conventional doses on a microgram equivalent basis, although even at 4000 micrograms such differences are unlikely to be clinically relevant. No differences between fenoterol and salbutamol have been shown in terms of bronchodilator potency on a microgram equivalent basis. The long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol, as a partial agonist, has the potential to attenuate the acute bronchodilator response to a higher activity beta 2-agonist such as salbutamol or fenoterol, although there is no evidence to date on whether this is relevant in the setting of acute asthma. When comparing inhaled corticosteroids, attention should be focused on their respective risk-benefit ratios for antiasthmatic versus systemic activity. In terms of detecting systemic activity, it is important to use sensitive measures, such as urinary cortisol excretion, rather than insensitive parameters, such as a single morning plasma cortisol measurement between 0800h and 1000h. For fluticasone, a greater in vitro potency results in only marginal differences in antiasthmatic efficacy, particularly on the flatter part of the dose-response curve above 1000 micrograms/day in adults and 400 micrograms/day in children. However, the same enhanced potency translates directly into commensurate differences in systemic adverse effects on the steep part of the systemic dose-response curve above 1000 micrograms/day in adults and 400 micrograms/day in children, respectively. Furthermore, with repeated twice-daily administration, a longer elimination half-life and prolonged systemic tissue retention due to enhanced lipophilicity will result in greater systemic activity observed at steady-state in long term administration studies. This dissociation of airway and systemic dose-response curves results in a J-shaped curve for benefit: risk ratio, with a watershed area above 1000 microgram/day in adults. This fall in the benefit: risk ratio is likely to be greater for fluticasone than for budesonide or beclomethasone. Further studies are needed to clearly define the dose-response relationships of higher potency steroids such as fluticasone, particularly on the steep part of the curve (for clinical efficacy), using the appropriate back-titration design along with sensitive measures of antiasthmatic and systemic activity.

Some pharmacodynamic aspects on long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists

1. Formoterol and salmeterol are the first members of a new generation of long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists for inhalation. The discovery of the long effect duration of formoterol was made by chance, while the development of salmeterol appeared to follow a purposeful research strategy. 2. Preclinical evaluation predictive of the clinical duration of effect of long-acting bronchodilators is not straightforward. Experiments in vitro may give false positive results, while experiments in vivo may show false negative results. 3. Once the principle of a long duration of effect was established, a number of novel long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists of various chemical structure have emerged. 4. There are two alternative models for the explanation of the long duration of effect: the exosite binding explaining the mode of action of salmeterol, and the more general diffusion microkinetic model applicable for both formoterol and salmeterol. 5. Long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists with a relatively low efficacy like salmeterol may, under certain circumstances, inhibit competitively the relaxing effect of agonists with higher efficacy like formoterol and salbutamol. 6. Like all other beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists in current clinical use, formoterol and salmeterol comprise racemic mixtures. Only the RR- and R-enantiomers are pharmacologically active. The experimental compounds TA-2005 and picumeterol have been developed as pure RR- and R-enantiomers, respectively.

Effects of prior treatment with salmeterol and formoterol on airway and systemic beta 2 responses to fenoterol

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that both salmeterol and formoterol act as partial beta 2 receptor agonists in terms of antagonising the extrapulmonary responses to fenoterol in normal subjects. The aim of the present study was to extend previous observations in evaluating the effect of prior treatment with salmeterol and formoterol on bronchodilator responses to fenoterol, a full beta 2 receptor agonist, in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Ten stable asthmatic patients of mean (SE) age 37 (3.7) years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 59.5 (4.1)% of predicted completed the study. One hour after inhaling single doses of placebo, salmeterol 25 micrograms, or formoterol 12 micrograms, dose-response curves to repeated doses of inhaled fenoterol were constructed (cumulative doses of 100-3200 micrograms). Measurements of airway and systemic beta 2 receptor mediated responses were made at baseline, after inhalation of placebo, salmeterol, or formoterol, and after each dose of fenoterol.

RESULTS

Salmeterol and formoterol produced significant bronchodilation compared with placebo (mean difference and 95% CI compared with placebo): FEV1, salmeterol 0.41 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.69) 1, formoterol 0.47 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.75) 1. Salmeterol and formoterol had no significant effect on systemic responses compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in peak airway responses to fenoterol after treatment with salmeterol or formoterol compared with placebo (mean (pooled SE)): FEV1, placebo 2.84 (0.03) 1, salmeterol 2.87 (0.03) 1, and formoterol 2.88 (0.03) 1. There were no significant differences in the area under the dose-response curve for any of the parameters during the dose-response curve following treatment with salmeterol or formoterol compared with placebo. There was no difference in the slope of the dose-response curves to fenoterol for FEV1 or forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75) after treatment with salmeterol or formoterol compared with placebo, although there was a significant (p < 0.05) attenuation of the slope in the dose-response curve for the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior treatment with low doses of salmeterol or formoterol does not significantly alter bronchodilator dose-response curves to repeated doses of fenoterol in stable asthmatic patients.

Grand Rounds--City Hospital, Nottingham. A complicated case of community acquired pneumonia

Images

Airway effects of salmeterol in healthy individuals

The long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol has been shown in several in vitro studies to produce non-beta-mediated relaxant effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether these effects have any relevance in humans in vivo. Thirteen healthy individuals were studied in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study on five separate days. The subjects were pre-treated orally with either propranolol 400 mg in order to block beta-adrenoceptor mediated effects or placebo. Two hours after drug intake, three increasing doses of salmeterol (25 + 50 + 100 micrograms), salbutamol (100 + 200 + 400 micrograms) or placebo were given from matched meter dose inhalers at 1-h intervals between doses. Specific airway conductance (sGAW) was measured in a body plethysmograph at the beginning of the experiment and 30 and 60 min after each inhaled dose of the beta-agonists. Salmeterol and salbutamol produced the same maximal increase in sGAW and had the same area under the dose-response curves. Pre-treatment with propranolol totally inhibited the effect of both drugs. In conclusion, salmeterol at clinically used doses did not produce any non-beta-mediated bronchodilating effect in normal individuals, measured as sGAW. Salmeterol and salbutamol showed the same efficacy but salmeterol was four times more potent than salbutamol.

The first 20 minutes after a single dose of inhaled salmeterol in asthmatic children

Very little is known as yet about the effect of salmeterol in pediatric asthma, so a trial was performed on children with mild asthma to compare salmeterol with salbutamol in terms of how quickly they took effect. The double-blind study involved 11 children (mean age 13.4 years) randomly assigned to inhale salmeterol 50 micrograms, salbutamol 200 micrograms, or a placebo three times on alternate days. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), heart rate, and blood pressure were measured before and 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after administering the medication. With salbutamol, PEF was higher at 5 and 10 min, subsequently dropping off at 15 and 20 min; with salmeterol, PEF was better at 10 and 20 min. Forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) measurements taken at the baseline and after 10 and 20 min revealed an important and consistent rise in values after salmeterol, whereas salbutamol was more effective after 10 min than after 20 min. No significant changes were recorded in heart rate or blood pressure after salbutamol; after salmeterol, there was a significant increase in heart rate after 5 min, but not at subsequent measurements. In conclusion, salmeterol begins to take effect already within 10 min of a single administration in asthmatic children, although the onset of its effect is slower than with salbutamol.

The effects of long-term treatment with salmeterol and salbutamol on the flow rate and composition of whole saliva in the rat

The effect of long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists on salivary glands and saliva secretion has not been studied before. Sprague-Dawley rats were given either the long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol, 1 mg/kg body wt per day or the short-acting agonist salbutamol, 5 mg/kg per day. Saline solution was used as control. After 18 days pilocarpine-stimulated saliva was collected, and after 21 days saliva was collected after stimulation with isoproterol and pilocarpine in combination. The saliva was analysed for total protein, amylase, hexosamine, sialic acid, sodium, potassium and calcium. At day 25 the salivary glands were extirpated and weighed. The weight of the parotid glands increased significantly after both salmeterol and salbutamol treatment, approx. 40%; the submandibular gland weights were not affected by either beta 2-agonist treatment. Pilocarpine-stimulated salivary flow rate was increased in the salbutamol, but not in the salmeterol, group. In the salmeterol group the concentration of sialic acid was increased and that of calcium was decreased. In saliva stimulated with pilocarpine and isoproterenol in combination, the concentrations of total protein, amylase and calcium were decreased after salmeterol. In the salbutamol group, total protein and potassium were decreased. The ratio sialic acid: total protein was increased at both saliva collections in both beta 2-agonist groups. It is concluded that rats treated chronically with the long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist salmeterol have an impaired secretion of salivary proteins and calcium and that the effect resembles that of salbutamol.

The interaction between salmeterol and beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists with higher efficacy on guinea-pig trachea and human bronchus in vitro

1. In guinea-pig tracheal preparations precontracted with 1 mumol l-1 carbachol, formoterol, procaterol, fenoterol, salmefamol, salbutamol and terbutaline (in that order of potency) caused a concentration-dependent and almost complete, relaxation. However, under these conditions, the maximum relaxation by salmeterol was approximately 30% of the maximum attainable relaxation. 2. We have therefore explored the ability of salmeterol to inhibit the relaxant response to beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists of different chemical structure and relatively higher efficacy in smooth muscle preparations from guinea-pig trachea and human bronchus. 3. With 1 mumol l-1 salmeterol in the organ bath, the concentration-effect curves for the other agonists were shifted to the right in a variable way by 1.8-2.8 log units, fenoterol and salbutamol being the extremes. 4. When 20 mumol l-1 sulfonterol, another low efficacy beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, was substituted for salmeterol, the difference in the magnitude of the rightward shift between fenoterol and salbutamol was eliminated. 5. In the human bronchus, formoterol and terbutaline had a higher apparent efficacy than salmeterol. With 1 mumol l-1 salmeterol in the organ bath, the concentration-effect curve for formoterol was shifted 2.7 log units to the right. 6. Salmeterol inhibits, competitively, relaxant responses to beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists with higher efficacy. The degree of inhibition seems to be dependent on the agonist used. This contrasts with results obtained with sulfonterol and suggests that salmeterol interacts with the beta 2-adrenoceptor in a complex way.

The beta 2-agonist controversy. Observations, explanations and relationship to asthma epidemiology

Links between frequent use of inhaled beta 2-agonists and morbidity and mortality from asthma appear probable. Two mortality epidemics followed the marketing of potent inhaled adrenergic agents. Case-control studies in New Zealand linked mortality with prescription of fenoterol, especially in severe asthma. A Saskatchewan case-control study confirmed an association of mortality with fenoterol, and also with frequent use of salbutamol (albuterol). Cardiac effects of beta 2-agonists do not cause mortality, but frequent use of these agents may increase the chronic severity of asthma, hence increasing the number of asthmatic patients at risk of death in an acute attack. Frequent use of beta 2-agonists may reduce lung function, increasing airway responsiveness, and impair control of asthma, despite use of inhaled corticosteroids. Mechanisms for this effect may include tachyphylaxis to nonbronchodilator effects, increased responsiveness to allergen, interaction with corticosteroid receptors, altered mucociliary function, differential effects of enantiomers, and masking of symptoms by beta 2-agonist use. The withdrawal of fenoterol from New Zealand in 1990 was associated with a substantial decline in morbidity and mortality. Overall, the evidence suggests that frequent use of inhaled beta 2-agonists has a deleterious effect on the control of asthma. Epidemics of mortality are explained by an increase in chronic severity of asthma following introduction of more potent beta 2-agonists. While beta 2-agonists remain essential for relief of breakthrough symptoms, long term use, particularly with high doses of potent agents, appears to be detrimental.

Systemic effects of salbutamol and salmeterol in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Knowing the extent of the systemic effects of a new beta 2 agonist relative to an established drug is important for the prediction and interpretation of side effects. A recent study in which the effect of cumulative doses of salbutamol was compared with single doses of salmetreol suggested that, weight for weight, salmeterol may be up to 10 times more potent than salbutamol. This current study was designed to investigate further the dose equivalence of salmeterol and salbutamol.

METHODS

Twelve patients with mild asthma inhaled cumulative doses of placebo, salmeterol 25, 50, 100, and 200 micrograms, and salbutamol 100, 500, 1000, and 1000 micrograms on separate days at hourly intervals in a randomised double blind crossover study. Changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), heart rate, plasma potassium concentration, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured. Dose equivalence was determined as the dose ratio of salmeterol to salbutamol for the 50% maximum response to salbutamol.

RESULTS

No important changes occurred in any measurements following placebo. Salmeterol and salbutamol caused a near maximum increase in FEV1 following the first dose so the dose equivalence for the airway effects could not be estimated. Heart rate increased and plasma potassium concentration and diastolic blood pressure decreased in a dose dependent manner following salmeterol and salbutamol, with median dose equivalences for salmeterol compared with salbutamol of 17.7, 7.8, and 7.6, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that the systemic activity of salmeterol compared with salbutamol is higher than would be expected from in vitro data, particularly for heart rate. Whether this is because of the relatively high dose of salmeterol used or pharmacokinetic differences between the two drugs is uncertain.

Clinical pharmacology of long-acting beta-receptor agonists

The longer-acting beta-receptor agonists salmeterol and formoterol are effective bronchodilators for at least 12 hours and this should be clinically useful, particularly for nocturnal asthma. Formoterol has a more rapid onset than salmeterol. There are limited dose response data on the two drugs in man but the evidence so far suggests that both drugs have roughly similar beta 2-selectivity to salbutamol and that both are about ten times as potent as salbutamol. Salmeterol may therefore have been marketed at a relatively high dose compared to salbutamol. There is no good clinical evidence to suggest that the drugs have effects other than would be expected from a beta 2-agonist with a prolonged duration of action. Medium-term studies have shown that benefit was maintained in comparison to salbutamol and, in one instance, with salmeterol when compared to placebo. Studies to date have not found any reduction in the bronchodilator response to salbutamol following regular treatment with salmeterol or formoterol, though one study has found reduced protection by salmeterol against methacholine challenge after one and two months' treatment. Longer-term safety has not been assessed.