1
|
Suzuki M, Harada N, Honda K, Koda M, Araki T, Kudo T, Watanabe T. Facilitators and barriers in implementing the nurse practitioner role in Japan: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Int Nurs Rev 2024; 71:291-298. [PMID: 35839821 DOI: 10.1111/inr.12790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the distribution of nurse practitioners (NPs) across Japan and their perceived facilitators and barriers to NP implementation in Japan. BACKGROUND NP certification examinations have been conducted in Japan since 2011, and by 2020, there were 487 NPs in the country. The momentum of NP implementation is slower in Japan compared with other countries. METHODS A cross-sectional descriptive study, following the STROBE guidelines, was conducted. Web-based survey questionnaires, developed by the authors, were administered to 248 NPs whose email addresses were maintained by the certification management body. RESULTS Valid responses were obtained from 101 NPs (response rate: 40.7%), of which 34% were male. The respondents had more than 12 years of registered nurse experience on an average before enrolling in the graduate NP program. 53% were employed as NPs from the beginning, while 25% were initially employed as registered nurses and later advanced to NPs, and 11% still worked as RNs. A majority worked in hospitals with beds. Many NPs perceived the lack of NP national licensure and reimbursement benefits as barriers to NP implementation, whereas recognition from superiors and organizations was considered facilitators. CONCLUSIONS Despite their small numbers in Japan, NPs take on crucial tasks and contribute to the appropriate distribution of medical resources. The NP licensure system and recognition from superiors and organizations may be necessary to promote NP roles in Japan. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY Some certified NPs still work as registered nurses. Recognition from nursing and organization administrators is critical to implementing NPs. To this end, a reimbursement system benefiting the organizations and a legislation facilitating NP employment are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miho Suzuki
- Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Nahoko Harada
- Graduate School of Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in Health Systems, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kazuya Honda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki Medical Center, National Hospital Organization, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Masahide Koda
- Center for Health Sciences and Counseling, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomoko Araki
- Department of Health and Social Services, Graduate School of Health and Environment Sciences, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Takemi Kudo
- Department of Health and Social Services, Graduate School of Health and Environment Sciences, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Takao Watanabe
- Department of Health and Social Services, Graduate School of Health and Environment Sciences, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Miyagi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Contandriopoulos D, Bertoni K, McCracken R, Hedden L, Lavergne R, Randhawa GK. Evaluating the cost of NP-led vs GP-led primary care in British Columbia. Healthc Manage Forum 2024:8404704241229075. [PMID: 38291669 DOI: 10.1177/08404704241229075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
In 2020, British Columbia (BC) opened four pilot Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics (NP-PCCs) to improve primary care access. The aim of this economic evaluation is to compare the average cost of care provided by Nurse Practitioners (NPs) working in BC's NP-PCCs to what it would have cost the government to have physicians provide equivalent care. Comparisons were made to both the Fee-For-Service (FFS) model and BC's new Longitudinal Family Physician (LFP) model. The analyses relied on administrative data, mostly from the Medical Services Plan (MSP) and Chronic Disease Registry (CDR) via BC's Health Data Platform. Results show the cost of NPs providing care in the NP-PCCs is slightly lower than what it would cost to provide similar care in medical clinics staffed by physicians paid through the LFP model. This suggests that the NP-PCC model is an efficient approach to increase accessibility to primary care services in BC and should be considered for expansion across the province.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rita McCracken
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lindsay Hedden
- Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wasan T, Hayhoe B, Cicek M, Lammila-Escalera E, Nicholls D, Majeed A, Greenfield G. The effects of community interventions on unplanned healthcare use in patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review. J R Soc Med 2024; 117:24-35. [PMID: 37449474 PMCID: PMC10858714 DOI: 10.1177/01410768231186224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarise the impact of community-based interventions for multimorbid patients on unplanned healthcare use. The prevalence of multimorbidity (co-existence of multiple chronic conditions) is rapidly increasing and affects one-third of the global population. Patients with multimorbidity have complex healthcare needs and greater unplanned healthcare usage. Community-based interventions allow for continued care of patients outside hospitals, but few studies have explored the effects of these interventions on unplanned healthcare usage. DESIGN A systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and Cochrane Library online databases were searched. Studies were screened and underwent risk of bias assessment. Data were synthesised using narrative synthesis. SETTING Community-based interventions. PARTICIPANTS Patients with multimorbidity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Unplanned healthcare usage. RESULTS Thirteen studies, including a total of 6148 participants, were included. All included studies came from high-income settings and had elderly populations. All studies measured emergency department attendances as their primary outcome. Risk of bias was generally low. Most community interventions were multifaceted with emphasis on education, self-monitoring of symptoms and regular follow-ups. Four studies looked at improved care coordination, advance care planning and palliative care. All 13 studies found a decrease in emergency department visits post-intervention with risk reduction ranging from 0 (95% confidencec interval [CI]: -0.37 to 0.37) to 0.735 (95% CI: 0.688-0.785). CONCLUSIONS Community-based interventions have potential to reduce emergency department visits in patients with multimorbidity. Identification of specific successful components of interventions was challenging given the overlaps between interventions. Policymakers should recognise the importance of community interventions and aim to integrate aspects of these into existing healthcare structures. Future research should investigate the impact of such interventions with broader participant characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tavleen Wasan
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Meryem Cicek
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Elena Lammila-Escalera
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Dasha Nicholls
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kinchen E. Holistic Nurse Practitioner Care Including Promotion of Shared Decision-Making. J Holist Nurs 2021; 40:326-335. [PMID: 34894839 DOI: 10.1177/08980101211062704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this quantitative, descriptive, exploratory study was to gauge the degree to which nurse practitioners (NPs) incorporate holistic nursing values in their care, with a special focus on shared decision-making (SDM), using the Nurse Practitioner Holistic Caring Instrument (NPHCI), an investigator-developed scale. A single open-ended question inviting free-text comment was also included, soliciting participants' views on the holistic attributes of their care. A convenience sample of NPs (n = 573) was recruited from a southeastern U.S. state Board of Nursing's (BON) publicly available list of licensed NPs. Results suggest that NPs do indeed perceive their care to be holistic, and that they routinely incorporate elements of SDM in their care. Highest scores were accorded to listening, taking time to talk to patients, knowledge of physical condition, soliciting patient input in care decisions, considering how other areas of a patient's life may affect their medical condition, and attention to "what matters most" to the patient. Age, gender, level of education, practice specialty, and location were also associated with inclusion of holistic care. Free-text responses revealed that NPs value holistic care and desire to practice holistically, but identify "lack of time" to incorporate or practice holistic care as a barrier.
Collapse
|
5
|
The effectiveness of the role of advanced nurse practitioners compared to physician-led or usual care: A systematic review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
6
|
Officer TN, McBride-Henry K. Perceptions of underlying practice hierarchies: Who is managing my care? BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:911. [PMID: 34479554 PMCID: PMC8414878 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06931-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of new health professional roles, such as that of the nurse practitioner and pharmacist prescriber in primary health care can lead to changes in health service delivery. Consumers, having used these roles, often report high satisfaction. However, there is limited knowledge of how these individuals position nurse practitioner and pharmacist prescriber roles within existing practice structures. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 individuals receiving services from these practitioners in New Zealand primary health care. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for thematic analysis. RESULTS Participant views reflect established practice hierarchies, placing advanced practitioners 'below' general practitioners. Participants are unable to articulate what it was about these practitioners that meant they operated at lower tiers and often considered practitioners to act as 'their doctor'. They also highlight structural barriers impairing the ability of these providers to operate within their full scope of practice. CONCLUSIONS While seeing value in the services they receive, consumers are often unable to position nurse practitioner and pharmacist prescriber roles within health system contexts or to articulate how they value their practitioner's skills. Embedded structural barriers may be more visible to consumers than their interactions with the health system suggest. This may influence peoples' ability to receive intended or optimal health services. Consumer 'health professional literacy' around the functions of distinct health practitioners should be supported so that they may make informed service provision choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara N Officer
- Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Pipitea Campus, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Karen McBride-Henry
- School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Practice, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Newtown Campus, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harpula K, Bartosiewicz A, Krukowski J. Polish Nurses' Opinions on the Expansion of Their Competences-Cross-Sectional Study. NURSING REPORTS 2021; 11:301-310. [PMID: 34968207 PMCID: PMC8608099 DOI: 10.3390/nursrep11020029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of medical science creates new challenges for nurses to acquire new skills. Thanks to legal changes in Poland, nurses have gained the opportunity to independently provide health services in many areas, including consultations for patients. The aim of the survey is to analyze nurses’ opinions on the expansion of competences in their profession. This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted among 798 nurses using the survey technique. The majority (65.48%) of the respondents believed that they were adequately prepared to take up new competences. Most of the respondents believed that the new competence would improve the efficiency of the healthcare system in Poland (71.06%) and facilitate patients’ access to health services (65.29%). According to the nurses, the scope of nursing advice will mainly concern the promotion of health education, wound treatment and prescribing medications. Age, seniority and education level significantly influenced the nurses’ opinions on the scope of nursing advice. The Mann–Whitney test and the Kruskal–Wallis test were used. A correlation between two quantitative variables was assessed with the Spearman’s rho coefficient. The significance level of p < 0.05 was assumed. The extension of the professional competences of nurses will increase the prestige of the profession and is another step toward introducing the role of Advanced Practice Nurse in Poland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinga Harpula
- Medical College, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, 35-225 Rzeszów, Poland;
- Healthcare Complex No. 2, Specialist Outpatient Clinic, Diagnostic Center, 35-005 Rzeszów, Poland
| | - Anna Bartosiewicz
- Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszów University, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-17-851-68-11
| | - Jerzy Krukowski
- Faculty of Health Sciences with the Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland;
- Palium Foundation, 89-600 Chojnice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Officer TN, Cumming J, McBride-Henry K. 'She taught me': factors consumers find important in nurse practitioner and pharmacist prescriber services. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2021; 19:41. [PMID: 33771187 PMCID: PMC8004467 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00587-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced practitioner services, such as those nurse practitioners and pharmacist prescribers provide, are an opportunity to improve health care delivery. In New Zealand, these practitioners remain underutilised, despite research suggesting they offer safe and effective care, and considerable international literature recording patient satisfaction with these roles. This study aimed to explore factors underlying consumer satisfaction with primary health care nurse practitioner and pharmacist prescriber services. METHODS As part of a larger realist evaluation, 21 individuals receiving advanced practitioner services participated in semi-structured interviews. These interviews were transcribed and coded against context-mechanism-outcome configurations tested and refined throughout the research. RESULTS Study findings emphasise the importance of consumer confidence in the provider as a mechanism for establishing advanced practitioner roles. Underlying this confidence is a recognition that these practitioners work in a more accessible manner, engage at the individual's 'level', and operate with passion. CONCLUSIONS This research offers learnings to re-engineer service delivery within primary health care to make best use of the entire health care team by including consumers in the design and introduction of new roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara N Officer
- Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Pipitea Campus, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | - Jackie Cumming
- Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Pipitea Campus, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Karen McBride-Henry
- School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Practice, Victoria University of Wellington, Newtown Campus, PO Box 7625, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elwenspoek MMC, Mann E, Alsop K, Clark H, Patel R, Watson JC, Whiting P. GP's perspectives on laboratory test use for monitoring long-term conditions: an audit of current testing practice. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:257. [PMID: 33278890 PMCID: PMC7719260 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01331-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have shown previously that current recommendations in UK guidelines for monitoring long-term conditions are largely based on expert opinion. Due to a lack of robust evidence on optimal monitoring strategies and testing intervals, the guidelines are unclear and incomplete. This uncertainty may underly variation in testing that has been observed across the UK between GP practices and regions. METHODS Our objective was to audit current testing practices of GPs in the UK; in particular, perspectives on laboratory tests for monitoring long-term conditions, the workload, and how confident GPs are in ordering and interpreting these tests. We designed an online survey consisting of multiple-choice and open-ended questions that was promoted on social media and in newsletters targeting GPs practicing in UK. The survey was live between October-November 2019. The results were analysed using a mixed-methods approach. RESULTS The survey was completed by 550 GPs, of whom 69% had more than 10 years of experience. The majority spent more than 30 min per day on testing (78%), but only half of the respondents felt confident in dealing with abnormal results (53%). There was a high level of disagreement for whether liver function tests and full blood counts should be done 'routinely', 'sometimes', or 'never' in patients with a certain long-term condition. The free text comments revealed three common themes: (1) pressures that promote over-testing, i.e. guidelines or protocols, workload from secondary care, fear of missing something, patient expectations; (2) negative consequences of over-testing, i.e. increased workload and patient harm; and (3) uncertainties due to lack of evidence and unclear guidelines. CONCLUSION These results confirm the variation that has been observed in test ordering data. The results also show that most GPs spent a significant part of their day ordering and interpreting monitoring tests. The lack of confidence in knowing how to act on abnormal test results underlines the urgent need for robust evidence on optimal testing and the development of clear and unambiguous testing recommendations. Uncertainties surrounding optimal testing has resulted in an over-use of tests, which leads to a waste of resources, increased GP workload and potential patient harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha M C Elwenspoek
- The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK. .,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Ed Mann
- Tyntesfield Medical Group, Bristol, BS48 2XX, UK
| | - Katharine Alsop
- Nightingale Valley Practice, Bristol, BS4 4HU, UK.,Brisdoc Healthcare Services, Bristol, BS14 0BB, UK
| | - Hannah Clark
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Rita Patel
- The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Jessica C Watson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Penny Whiting
- The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rao A, Dhahri AA, Razzaq H, Mokhtari E, Majeed A, Patel A. Algorithm-Based Online Software for Patients' Self-Referral to Breast Clinic as an Alternative to General Practitioner Referral Pathway. Cureus 2020; 12:e11740. [PMID: 33274168 PMCID: PMC7707138 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The study aimed to assess the accuracy of online software in the use of self-referral to breast surgery clinics for patients with new signs and symptoms. The study also evaluated the appropriateness of GP referrals to breast clinics and evaluated patients' perceptions of an online self-referral portal to the breast clinic for the assessment of breast signs and symptoms. Design and methods The pilot study was divided into two phases. In the first phase, prospective questionnaire-based data was collected from patients who were referred by a GP and presented to the regional breast unit with new signs and symptoms for breast conditions, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust (May - October 2018). The questionnaire assessed the time at each stage required by the patient to have a visit at the breast unit. It also asked the patient's opinion about an online self-referral portal to the surgical clinic. They were given hypothetical scenarios to evaluate their understanding of breast conditions. In the second phase, the patients presenting to symptomatic breast clinics were provided with the iPad to fill in their medical information in the online software. The data was collected between July and October 2019. The software algorithm was based on the National Institute of Clinical Health and Excellence (NICE) guidelines for breast conditions (2015). Breast surgeons’ recommendations acted as a standard to evaluate the accuracy of GPs' referrals and software outcome for each patient. Results There were 80 patients (mean age 49.1 [SD: 17.7], all females) included in the first phase of the study. The most common clinical presentation was a breast lump (47.6%), followed by breast pain (26.9%) and nipple changes (7.9%). Breast surgeons considered appropriate 75.6% of the referrals made by the GP. Seventy-two percent of the patients got an urgent appointment to see their GP, and 94.8% of the patients were urgently referred by their GP to see the breast surgeon. Only 37.8% of the urgent referrals were correctly referred as urgent. Having a direct online referral system for breast conditions will be beneficial for patients was agreed by 78.4%. The majority (98.1%) of the participants answered correctly for the hypothetical questions requiring breast surgeon review. In the second phase, there were a total of 86 patients with a mean age of 43.9 (SD: 13.3). The most common presentation was breast lump (n=68, 79.1%) and other presentations included breast pain, nipple changes, and discharge. The GPs' accuracy of correct referral was 69.1%. One third (30.9%) of the referrals could have been managed in the community or as a routine review by the breast surgeon. In comparison, the online software's accuracy was 85.1% accurate (p=0.001). The accuracy for detecting patients who needed urgent breast clinic review was 100% for online software. Conclusion A large proportion of referrals could have been dealt with in the community or referred routinely. Patients would prefer a direct online referral system to the breast clinic. They understand red flag signs and symptoms. Online software has the potential to streamline patients for symptomatic breast clinics. It can reduce the burden on the GPs who are constantly under pressure to diagnose patients accurately and refer to the correct specialty appropriately within a short time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahsan Rao
- Breast Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR
| | | | - Humayun Razzaq
- General Surgery, Southend University Hospital, Southend-on-Sea, GBR
| | - Eshagh Mokhtari
- Breast Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, GBR
| | - Azeem Majeed
- Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, GBR
| | - Ashraf Patel
- Breast Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Birtley NM, Phillips L. The business and practice of psychiatric advanced practice nursing in long term care. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2020; 34:288-296. [PMID: 33032748 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy M Birtley
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, United States of America; Nancy M. Birtley, LLC, Psychiatric Consultation Services, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
| | - Lorraine Phillips
- School of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, Unites States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lai MMY, Roberts N, Mohebbi M, Martin J. A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2020; 20:277. [PMID: 32819352 PMCID: PMC7439652 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02171-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of feedback has been integral to medical student learning, but rigorous evidence to evaluate its education effect is limited, especially in the role of patient feedback in clinical teaching and practice improvement. The aim of the Patient Teaching Associate (PTA) Feedback Study was to evaluate whether additional written consumer feedback on patient satisfaction improved consultation skills among medical students and whether multisource feedback (MSF) improved student performance. METHODS In this single site, double-blinded randomised controlled trial, 71 eligible medical students from two universities in their first clinical year were allocated to intervention or control and followed up for one semester. They participated in five simulated student-led consultations in a teaching clinic with patient volunteers living with chronic illness. Students in the intervention group received additional written feedback on patient satisfaction combined with guided self-reflection. The control group received usual immediate formative multisource feedback from tutors, patients and peers. Student characteristics, baseline patient-rated satisfaction scores and tutor-rated consultation skills were measured. RESULTS Follow-up assessments were complete in 70 students attending the MSF program. At the final consultation episodes, both groups improved patient-rated rapport (P = 0.002), tutor-rated patient-centeredness and tutor-rated overall consultation skills (P = 0.01). The intervention group showed significantly better tutor-rated patient-centeredness (P = 0.003) comparing with the control group. Distress relief, communication comfort, rapport reported by patients and tutor-rated clinical skills did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The innovative multisource feedback program effectively improved consultation skills in medical students. Structured written consumer feedback combined with guided student reflection further improved patient-centred practice and effectively enhanced the benefit of an MSF model. This strategy might provide a valuable adjunct to communication skills education for medical students. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12613001055796 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Y Lai
- Medical Student Programs, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University and Deakin University, Level 2, Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia.
- Curtin University Medical School, Perth, Australia.
| | - Noel Roberts
- Medical Student Programs, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University and Deakin University, Level 2, Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia
| | | | - Jenepher Martin
- Medical Student Programs, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University and Deakin University, Level 2, Arnold Street, Box Hill, VIC, 3128, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gysin S, Meier R, van Vught A, Merlo C, Gemperli A, Essig S. Differences in patient population and service provision between nurse practitioner and general practitioner consultations in Swiss primary care: a case study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:164. [PMID: 32791993 PMCID: PMC7425147 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01240-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Primary care systems around the world have implemented nurse practitioners (NPs) to ensure access to high quality care in times of general practitioner (GP) shortages and changing health care needs of a multimorbid, ageing population. In Switzerland, NPs are currently being introduced, and their exact role is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to get insight into patient characteristics and services provided in NP consultations compared to GP consultations in Swiss primary care. Methods This case study used retrospective observational data from electronic medical records of a family practice with one NP and two GPs. Data on patient-provider encounters were collected between August 2017 and December 2018. We used logistic regression to assess associations between the assignment of the patients to the NP or GP and patient characteristics and delivered services respectively. Results Data from 5210 patients participating in 27,811 consultations were analyzed. The average patient age was 44.3 years (SD 22.6), 47.1% of the patients were female and 19.4% multimorbid. 1613 (5.8%) consultations were with the NP, and 26,198 (94.2%) with the two GPs. Patients in NP consultations were more often aged 85+ (OR 3.43; 95%-CI 2.70–4.36), multimorbid (OR 1.37; 95%-CI 1.24–1.51; p < 0.001) and polypharmaceutical (OR 1.28; 95%-CI 1.15–1.42; p < 0.001) in comparison to GP consultations. In NP consultations, vital signs (OR 3.05; 95%-CI 2.72–3.42; p < 0.001) and anthropometric data (OR 1.33; 95%-CI 1.09–1.63; p 0.005) were measured more frequently, and lab tests (OR 1.16; 95%-CI 1.04–1.30; p 0.008) were ordered more often compared to GP consultations, independent of patient characteristics. By contrast, medications (OR 0.35; 95%-CI 0.30–0.41; p < 0.001) were prescribed or changed less frequently in NP consultations. Conclusions Quantitative data from pilot projects provide valuable insights into NP tasks and activities in Swiss primary care. Our results provide first indications that NPs might have a focus on and could offer care to the growing number of multimorbid, polypharmaceutical elderly in Swiss primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Gysin
- Institute of Primary and Community Care, Schwanenplatz 7, 6004, Luzern, Switzerland. .,Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland.
| | - Rahel Meier
- Institute of Primary Care Zurich, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Anneke van Vught
- HAN University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Christoph Merlo
- Institute of Primary and Community Care, Schwanenplatz 7, 6004, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Armin Gemperli
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland.,Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Essig
- Institute of Primary and Community Care, Schwanenplatz 7, 6004, Luzern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Nursing and midwifery practice has evolved, with many nurses and midwives now holding prescriptive authority. This paper reports on findings in relation to care which formed part of a broader qualitative study which aimed to explore the experiences of nurse and midwife prescribers in the maternity setting in Ireland. Following research ethics approval, 16 nurse/midwife prescribers participated in one-to-one audio recorded semi-structured interviews. Prescriptive authority both enhances the caring role of the nurse/midwife and supports safer care. The ways in which this happened have been illuminated though barriers have also been identified. In order for the full potential of nurses/midwives with prescriptive authority to be realised, measures such as increasing the number of prescribers and the provision on non-interruption zones need to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanel Watson
- Health Professions Education School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Delegating home visits in general practice: a realist review on the impact on GP workload and patient care. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70:e412-e420. [PMID: 32424046 PMCID: PMC7239043 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x710153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background UK general practice is being shaped by new ways of working. Traditional GP tasks are being delegated to other staff with the intention of reducing GPs’ workload and hospital admissions, and improving patients’ access to care. One such task is patient-requested home visits. However, it is unclear what impact delegated home visits may have, who might benefit, and under what circumstances. Aim To explore how the process of delegating home visits works, for whom, and in what contexts. Design and setting A review of secondary data on home visit delegation processes in UK primary care settings. Method A realist approach was taken to reviewing data, which aims to provide causal explanations through the generation and articulation of contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes. A range of data has been used including news items, grey literature, and academic articles. Results Data were synthesised from 70 documents. GPs may believe that delegating home visits is a risky option unless they have trust and experience with the wider multidisciplinary team. Internal systems such as technological infrastructure might help or hinder the delegation process. Healthcare professionals carrying out delegated home visits might benefit from being integrated into general practice but may feel that their clinical autonomy is limited by the delegation process. Patients report short-term satisfaction when visited by a healthcare professional other than a GP. The impact this has on long-term health outcomes and cost is less clear. Conclusion The delegation of home visits may require a shift in patient expectation about who undertakes care. Professional expectations may also require a shift, having implications for the balance of staffing between primary and secondary care, and the training of healthcare professionals.
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu CF, Hebert PL, Douglas JH, Neely EL, Sulc CA, Reddy A, Sales AE, Wong ES. Outcomes of primary care delivery by nurse practitioners: Utilization, cost, and quality of care. Health Serv Res 2020; 55:178-189. [PMID: 31943190 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine whether nurse practitioner (NP)-assigned patients exhibited differences in utilization, costs, and clinical outcomes compared to medical doctor (MD)-assigned patients. DATA SOURCES Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data capturing characteristics, outcomes, and provider assignments of 806 434 VA patients assigned to an MD primary care provider (PCP) who left VA practice between 2010 and 2012. STUDY DESIGN We applied a difference-in-difference approach comparing outcomes between patients reassigned to MD and NP PCPs, respectively. We examined measures of outpatient (primary care, specialty care, and mental health) and inpatient (total and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations) utilization, costs (outpatient, inpatient and total), and clinical outcomes (control of hemoglobin A1c, LDL, and blood pressure) in the year following reassignment. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Compared to MD-assigned patients, NP-assigned patients were less likely to use primary care and specialty care services and incurred fewer total and ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations. Differences in costs, clinical outcomes, and receipt of diagnostic tests between groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Patients reassigned to NPs experienced similar outcomes and incurred less utilization at comparable cost relative to MD patients. NPs may offer a cost-effective approach to addressing anticipated shortages of primary care physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan-Fen Liu
- Department of Health Services, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul L Hebert
- Department of Health Services, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.,Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jamie H Douglas
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Emily L Neely
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christine A Sulc
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ashok Reddy
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Anne E Sales
- Center of Innovation for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.,Division of Learning and Knowledge Systems, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Edwin S Wong
- Department of Health Services, Magnuson Health Sciences Center, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington.,Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abraham CM, Norful AA, Stone PW, Poghosyan L. Cost-Effectiveness of Advanced Practice Nurses Compared to Physician-Led Care for Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review. NURSING ECONOMIC$ 2019; 37:293-305. [PMID: 34616101 PMCID: PMC8491992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Globally, advanced practice nurses (APNs) provide high-quality chronic disease care to patients, yet the cost-effectiveness of their services is minimally explored. This review aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of chronic disease care provided by APNs compared to physicians globally.
Collapse
|
18
|
Johnson D, Ouenes O, Letson D, de Belen E, Kubal T, Czarnecki C, Weems L, Box B, Paculdo D, Peabody J. A Direct Comparison of the Clinical Practice Patterns of Advanced Practice Providers and Doctors. Am J Med 2019; 132:e778-e785. [PMID: 31145882 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rising health care costs, physician shortages, and an aging patient population have increased the demand and utilization of advanced practice providers (APPs). Despite their expanding role in care delivery, little research has evaluated the care delivered by APPs compared with physicians. METHODS We used clinical patient simulations to measure and compare the clinical care offered by APPs and physicians, collecting data from 4 distinct health care systems/hospitals in the United States between 2013 and 2017. Specialties ranged from primary care to hospital medicine and oncology. Primary study outcomes were to 1) measure any differences in practice patterns between APPs and physicians, and 2) determine whether the use of serial measurement and feedback could mitigate any such differences. RESULTS At baseline, we found no major differences in overall performance of APPs compared with physicians (P = .337). APPs performed 3.2% better in history taking (P = .013) and made 10.5% fewer unnecessary referrals (P = .025), whereas physicians ordered 17.6% fewer low-value tests per case (P = .042). Regardless of specialty or site, after 4 rounds of serial measurement and provider-specific feedback, APPs and physicians had similar increases in average overall scores-7.4% and 7.6%, respectively (P < .001 for both). Not only did both groups improve, but practice differences between the groups disappeared, leading to a 9.1% decrease in overall practice variation. CONCLUSIONS We found only modest differences in quality of care provided by APPs and physicians. Importantly, both groups improved their performance with serial measurement and feedback so that after 4 rounds, the original differences were mitigated entirely and overall variation significantly reduced. Our data suggest that APPs can provide high quality care in multiple clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brent Box
- AdventHealth, Altamonte Springs, Fla
| | | | - John Peabody
- QURE Healthcare, San Francisco, Calif; University of California, Los Angeles; Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Variabilidad en la exploración motora de la enfermedad de Parkinson entre el neurólogo experto en trastornos del movimiento y la enfermera especializada. Neurologia 2019; 34:520-526. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2017.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Revised: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
20
|
de Deus Fonticoba T, Santos García D, Macías Arribí M. Inter-rater variability in motor function assessment in Parkinson's disease between experts in movement disorders and nurses specialising in PD management. NEUROLOGÍA (ENGLISH EDITION) 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2017.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
|
21
|
Karimi‐Shahanjarini A, Shakibazadeh E, Rashidian A, Hajimiri K, Glenton C, Noyes J, Lewin S, Laurant M, Colvin CJ. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 4:CD010412. [PMID: 30982950 PMCID: PMC6462850 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010412.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Having nurses take on tasks that are typically conducted by doctors (doctor-nurse substitution, a form of 'task-shifting') may help to address doctor shortages and reduce doctors' workload and human resource costs. A Cochrane Review of effectiveness studies suggested that nurse-led care probably leads to similar healthcare outcomes as care delivered by doctors. This finding highlights the need to explore the factors that affect the implementation of strategies to substitute doctors with nurses in primary care. In our qualitative evidence synthesis (QES), we focused on studies of nurses taking on tasks that are typically conducted by doctors working in primary care, including substituting doctors with nurses or expanding nurses' roles. OBJECTIVES (1) To identify factors influencing implementation of interventions to substitute doctors with nurses in primary care. (2) To explore how our synthesis findings related to, and helped to explain, the findings of the Cochrane intervention review of the effectiveness of substituting doctors with nurses. (3) To identify hypotheses for subgroup analyses for future updates of the Cochrane intervention review. SEARCH METHODS We searched CINAHL and PubMed, contacted experts in the field, scanned the reference lists of relevant studies and conducted forward citation searches for key articles in the Social Science Citation Index and Science Citation Index databases, and 'related article' searches in PubMed. SELECTION CRITERIA We constructed a maximum variation sample (exploring variables such as country level of development, aspects of care covered and the types of participants) from studies that had collected and analysed qualitative data related to the factors influencing implementation of doctor-nurse substitution and the expansion of nurses' tasks in community or primary care worldwide. We included perspectives of doctors, nurses, patients and their families/carers, policymakers, programme managers, other health workers and any others directly involved in or affected by the substitution. We excluded studies that collected data using qualitative methods but did not analyse the data qualitatively. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We identified factors influencing implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies using a framework thematic synthesis approach. Two review authors independently assessed the methodological strengths and limitations of included studies using a modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. We assessed confidence in the evidence for the QES findings using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We integrated our findings with the evidence from the effectiveness review of doctor-nurse substitution using a matrix model. Finally, we identified hypotheses for subgroup analyses for updates of the review of effectiveness. MAIN RESULTS We included 66 studies (69 papers), 11 from low- or middle-income countries and 55 from high-income countries. These studies found several factors that appeared to influence the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies. The following factors were based on findings that we assessed as moderate or high confidence.Patients in many studies knew little about nurses' roles and the difference between nurse-led and doctor-led care. They also had mixed views about the type of tasks that nurses should deliver. They preferred doctors when the tasks were more 'medical' but accepted nurses for preventive care and follow-ups. Doctors in most studies also preferred that nurses performed only 'non-medical' tasks. Nurses were comfortable with, and believed they were competent to deliver a wide range of tasks, but particularly emphasised tasks that were more health promotive/preventive in nature.Patients in most studies thought that nurses were more easily accessible than doctors. Doctors and nurses also saw nurse-doctor substitution and collaboration as a way of increasing people's access to care, and improving the quality and continuity of care.Nurses thought that close doctor-nurse relationships and doctor's trust in and acceptance of nurses was important for shaping their roles. But nurses working alone sometimes found it difficult to communicate with doctors.Nurses felt they had gained new skills when taking on new tasks. But nurses wanted more and better training. They thought this would increase their skills, job satisfaction and motivation, and would make them more independent.Nurses taking on doctors' tasks saw this as an opportunity to develop personally, to gain more respect and to improve the quality of care they could offer to patients. Better working conditions and financial incentives also motivated nurses to take on new tasks. Doctors valued collaborating with nurses when this reduced their own workload.Doctors and nurses pointed to the importance of having access to resources, such as enough staff, equipment and supplies; good referral systems; experienced leaders; clear roles; and adequate training and supervision. But they often had problems with these issues. They also pointed to the huge number of documents they needed to complete when tasks were moved from doctors to nurses. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Patients, doctors and nurses may accept the use of nurses to deliver services that are usually delivered by doctors. But this is likely to depend on the type of services. Nurses taking on extra tasks want respect and collaboration from doctors; as well as proper resources; good referral systems; experienced leaders; clear roles; and adequate incentives, training and supervision. However, these needs are not always met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akram Karimi‐Shahanjarini
- Hamadan University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Public HealthMahdeieh Ave. Hamadan, IranHamadanHamadanIran
- Hamadan University of Medical SciencesSocial Determinants of Health Research CenterHamadanIran
| | - Elham Shakibazadeh
- Tehran University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Health Education and Health PromotionTehranTehranIran
| | - Arash Rashidian
- Tehran University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Health Management and Economics, School of Public HealthPoursina AveTehranIran1417613191
| | - Khadijeh Hajimiri
- School of Public Health, Zanjan University of Medical SciencesDepartment of Health Education and Health PromotionZanjanIran
| | - Claire Glenton
- Norwegian Institute of Public HealthPO Box 7004 St Olavs plassOsloNorwayN‐0130
| | - Jane Noyes
- Bangor UniversityCentre for Health‐Related Research, Fron HeulogBangorWalesUKLL57 2EF
| | - Simon Lewin
- Norwegian Institute of Public HealthPO Box 7004 St Olavs plassOsloNorwayN‐0130
- South African Medical Research CouncilHealth Systems Research UnitPO Box 19070TygerbergSouth Africa7505
| | - Miranda Laurant
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcareRadboud University Medical CenterPO Box 9101NijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
- Institute of Nursing StudiesHAN University of Applied SciencesNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Christopher J Colvin
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape TownDivision of Social and Behavioural SciencesCape TownSouth Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Goddard D, de Vries K, McIntosh T, Theodosius C. Prison Nurses' Professional Identity. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC NURSING 2019; 15:163-171. [PMID: 31162289 DOI: 10.1097/jfn.0000000000000239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In the United Kingdom, health and justice services nurses are a diverse group working across a range of contexts and settings such as police custody, sexual assault referral centers, young offenders' institutes, and prisons and probation. Recruitment and retention to the specialist field of health and justice services nursing, specifically prison nursing, is problematic in the United Kingdom. In this article, we consider the background to the current situation in prison nursing and summarize some of the existing literature and research relating to this specialty to raise, for discussion and debate, issues that are pertinent to the concept of professional identity and professionalism. Role definition, resilience and burnout, and education within prison nursing are identified in relation to the development of professional identity. It could be that professional identity is the missing link to recruitment and retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Goddard
- Author Affiliations: The School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Kay de Vries
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Tania McIntosh
- Author Affiliations: The School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Theodosius
- Author Affiliations: The School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Muench U, Guo C, Thomas C, Perloff J. Medication adherence, costs, and ER visits of nurse practitioner and primary care physician patients: Evidence from three cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res 2018; 54:187-197. [PMID: 30284237 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare medication adherence, cost, and utilization in Medicare beneficiaries attributed to nurse practitioners (NP) and primary care physicians (PCP). DATA Medicare Part A, B, and D claims and beneficiary summary file data, years 2009-2013. STUDY DESIGN We used propensity score-weighted analyses combined with logistic regression and generalized estimating equations to test differences in good medication adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC >0.8); office-based and specialty care costs; and ER visits. DATA EXTRACTION Beneficiaries with prescription claims for anti-diabetics, renin-angiotensin system antagonists (RASA), or statins. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS There were no differences in good medication adherence (PDC >0.8) between NP and PCP attributed beneficiaries taking anti-diabetics or RASA. Beneficiaries taking statins had a slightly higher probability of good adherence when attributed to PCPs (74.6% vs 75.5%; P < 0.05). NP attributed beneficiaries had lower office-based and specialty care costs and were less likely to experience an ER visit across all three medication cohorts (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Examining the impact of NP and PCP provided care on outcomes beyond the primary care setting is important to the Medicare program in general but will also help practices seeking to meet benchmarks under alternative payment models that incentivize higher quality and lower costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Muench
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Chaoran Guo
- Department of Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Cindy Thomas
- The Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Perks J, Algoso M, Peters K. Nurse practitioner (NP) led care: Cervical screening practices and experiences of women attending a women’s health centre. Collegian 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2017.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
26
|
Abstract
Abstract
Editor’s Perspective
What We Already Know about This Topic
What This Article Tells Us That Is New
Background
In the United States, anesthesia care can be provided by an anesthesia care team consisting of nonphysician providers (nurse anesthetists and anesthesiologist assistants) working under the supervision of a physician anesthesiologist. Nurse anesthetists may practice nationwide, whereas anesthesiologist assistants are restricted to 16 states. To inform policies concerning the expanded use of anesthesiologist assistants, the authors examined whether the specific anesthesia care team composition (physician anesthesiologist plus nurse anesthetist or anesthesiologist assistant) was associated with differences in perioperative outcomes.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was performed of national claims data for 443,098 publicly insured elderly (ages 65 to 89 yr) patients who underwent inpatient surgery between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011. The differences in inpatient mortality, spending, and length of stay between cases where an anesthesiologist supervised an anesthesiologist assistant compared to cases where an anesthesiologist supervised a nurse anesthetist were estimated. The approach used a quasirandomization technique known as instrumental variables to reduce confounding.
Results
The adjusted mortality for care teams with anesthesiologist assistants was 1.6% (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.8) versus 1.7% for care teams with nurse anesthetists (95% CI, 1.7 to 1.7; difference −0.08; 95% CI, −0.3 to 0.1; P = 0.47). Compared to care teams with nurse anesthetists, care teams with anesthesiologist assistants were associated with non–statistically significant decreases in length of stay (−0.009 days; 95% CI, −0.1 to 0.1; P = 0.89) and medical spending (−$56; 95% CI, −334 to 223; P = 0.70).
Conclusions
The specific composition of the anesthesia care team was not associated with any significant differences in mortality, length of stay, or inpatient spending.
Collapse
|
27
|
Murphy M, Hollinghurst S, Salisbury C. Patient understanding of two commonly used patient reported outcome measures for primary care: a cognitive interview study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2018; 19:162. [PMID: 30261850 PMCID: PMC6161379 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0850-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Background Standardised generic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) which measure health status are often unresponsive to change in primary care. Alternative formats, which have been used to increase responsiveness, include individualised PROMs (in which respondents specify the outcomes of interest in their own words) and transitional PROMs (in which respondents directly rate change over a period). The objective of this study was to test qualitatively, through cognitive interviews, two PROMs, one using each respective format. Methods The individualised PROM selected was the Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile (MYMOP). The transitional PROM was the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI). Twenty patients who had recently attended the GP were interviewed while completing the questionnaires. Interview data was analysed using a modification of Tourangeau’s model of cognitive processing: comprehension, response, recall and face validity. Results Patients found the PEI simple to complete, but for some it lacked face validity. The transitional scale was sometimes confused with a status scale and was problematic in situations when the relevant GP appointment was part of a longer episode of care. Some patients reported a high enablement score despite verbally reporting low enablement but high regard for their GP, which suggested hypothesis-guessing. The interpretation of the PEI items was inconsistent between patients. MYMOP was more difficult for patients to complete, but had greater face validity than the PEI. The scale used was open to response-shift: some patients suggested they would recalibrate their definition of the scale endpoints as their illness and expectations changed. Conclusions The study provides information for both users of PEI/MYMOP and developers of individualised and transitional questionnaires. Users should heed the recommendation that MYMOP should be interview-administered, and this is likely to apply to other individualised scales. The PEI is open to hypothesis-guessing and may lack face-validity for a longer episode of care (e.g. in patients with chronic conditions). Developers should be cognisant that transitional scales can be inconsistently completed: some patients forget during completion that they are measuring change from baseline. Although generic questionnaires require the content to be more general than do disease-specific questionnaires, developers should avoid questions which allow broad and varied interpretations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0850-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Murphy
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Sandra Hollinghurst
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Duncan
- Lecturer, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University, Belfast
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nurse practitioner consultations in primary health care: a case study-based survey of patients' pre-consultation expectations, and post-consultation satisfaction and enablement. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2018; 20:e36. [PMID: 30012232 PMCID: PMC6536762 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423618000415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Research has not yet fully investigated links to consultation duration, patient expectations, satisfaction, and enablement in nurse practitioner consultations. This study was developed to address some of these research gaps in nurse practitioner consultations, particularly with a focus on expectations, satisfaction, and enablement. Aim To explore the influence of pre-consultation expectations, and consultation time length durations on patient satisfaction and enablement in nurse practitioner consultations in primary health care. Design Survey component of a larger convergent parallel mixed methods case study designed to conjointly investigate the communication processes, social interactions, and measured outcomes of nurse practitioner consultations. The survey element of the case study focusses on investigating patients’ pre-consultation expectations and post-consultation patient satisfaction and enablement. Methods A questionnaire measuring pre-consultation expectations, and post-consultation satisfaction and enablement, completed by a convenience sample of 71 adults consulting with nurse practitioners at a general practice clinic. Initial fieldwork took place in September 2011 to November 2012, with subsequent follow-up fieldwork in October 2016. Results Respondents were highly satisfied with their consultations and expressed significantly higher levels of enablement than have been seen in previous studies of enablement with other types of clinicians (P=0.003). A significant, small to moderate, positive correlation of 0.427 (P=0.005) between general satisfaction and enablement was noted. No significant correlation was seen between consultation time lengths and satisfaction or enablement. Conclusion Higher levels of patient enablement and satisfaction are not necessarily determined by the time lengths of consultations, and how consultations are conducted may be more important than their time lengths for optimising patient satisfaction and enablement.
Collapse
|
30
|
Laurant M, van der Biezen M, Wijers N, Watananirun K, Kontopantelis E, van Vught AJAH. Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 7:CD001271. [PMID: 30011347 PMCID: PMC6367893 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001271.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current and expected problems such as ageing, increased prevalence of chronic conditions and multi-morbidity, increased emphasis on healthy lifestyle and prevention, and substitution for care from hospitals by care provided in the community encourage countries worldwide to develop new models of primary care delivery. Owing to the fact that many tasks do not necessarily require the knowledge and skills of a doctor, interest in using nurses to expand the capacity of the primary care workforce is increasing. Substitution of nurses for doctors is one strategy used to improve access, efficiency, and quality of care. This is the first update of the Cochrane review published in 2005. OBJECTIVES Our aim was to investigate the impact of nurses working as substitutes for primary care doctors on:• patient outcomes;• processes of care; and• utilisation, including volume and cost. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), part of the Cochrane Library (www.cochranelibrary.com), as well as MEDLINE, Ovid, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and EbscoHost (searched 20.01.2015). We searched for grey literature in the Grey Literature Report and OpenGrey (21.02.2017), and we searched the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov trial registries (21.02.2017). We did a cited reference search for relevant studies (searched 27.01 2015) and checked reference lists of all included studies. We reran slightly revised strategies, limited to publication years between 2015 and 2017, for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and CINAHL, in March 2017, and we have added one trial to 'Studies awaiting classification'. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials evaluating the outcomes of nurses working as substitutes for doctors. The review is limited to primary healthcare services that provide first contact and ongoing care for patients with all types of health problems, excluding mental health problems. Studies which evaluated nurses supplementing the work of primary care doctors were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently carried out data extraction and assessment of risk of bias of included studies. When feasible, we combined study results and determined an overall estimate of the effect. We evaluated other outcomes by completing a structured synthesis. MAIN RESULTS For this review, we identified 18 randomised trials evaluating the impact of nurses working as substitutes for doctors. One study was conducted in a middle-income country, and all other studies in high-income countries. The nursing level was often unclear or varied between and even within studies. The studies looked at nurses involved in first contact care (including urgent care), ongoing care for physical complaints, and follow-up of patients with a particular chronic conditions such as diabetes. In many of the studies, nurses could get additional support or advice from a doctor. Nurse-doctor substitution for preventive services and health education in primary care has been less well studied.Study findings suggest that care delivered by nurses, compared to care delivered by doctors, probably generates similar or better health outcomes for a broad range of patient conditions (low- or moderate-certainty evidence):• Nurse-led primary care may lead to slightly fewer deaths among certain groups of patients, compared to doctor-led care. However, the results vary and it is possible that nurse-led primary care makes little or no difference to the number of deaths (low-certainty evidence).• Blood pressure outcomes are probably slightly improved in nurse-led primary care. Other clinical or health status outcomes are probably similar (moderate-certainty evidence).• Patient satisfaction is probably slightly higher in nurse-led primary care (moderate-certainty evidence). Quality of life may be slightly higher (low-certainty evidence).We are uncertain of the effects of nurse-led care on process of care because the certainty of this evidence was assessed as very low.The effect of nurse-led care on utilisation of care is mixed and depends on the type of outcome. Consultations are probably longer in nurse-led primary care (moderate-certainty evidence), and numbers of attended return visits are slightly higher for nurses than for doctors (high-certainty evidence). We found little or no difference between nurses and doctors in the number of prescriptions and attendance at accident and emergency units (high-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in the number of tests and investigations, hospital referrals and hospital admissions between nurses and doctors (low-certainty evidence).We are uncertain of the effects of nurse-led care on the costs of care because the certainty of this evidence was assessed as very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review shows that for some ongoing and urgent physical complaints and for chronic conditions, trained nurses, such as nurse practitioners, practice nurses, and registered nurses, probably provide equal or possibly even better quality of care compared to primary care doctors, and probably achieve equal or better health outcomes for patients. Nurses probably achieve higher levels of patient satisfaction, compared to primary care doctors. Furthermore, consultation length is probably longer when nurses deliver care and the frequency of attended return visits is probably slightly higher for nurses, compared to doctors. Other utilisation outcomes are probably the same. The effects of nurse-led care on process of care and the costs of care are uncertain, and we also cannot ascertain what level of nursing education leads to the best outcomes when nurses are substituted for doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda Laurant
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcareRadboud University Medical CenterPO Box 9101NijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
- HAN University of Applied SciencesFaculty of Health and Social StudiesNijmegenNetherlands
| | - Mieke van der Biezen
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcareRadboud University Medical CenterPO Box 9101NijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
| | | | - Kanokwaroon Watananirun
- Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyMahidolThailand
| | - Evangelos Kontopantelis
- The University of ManchesterCentre for Health Informatics, Institute of Population HealthWilliamson Building, 5th FloorOxford RoadManchesterGreater ManchesterUKM13 9PL
| | - Anneke JAH van Vught
- HAN University of Applied SciencesFaculty of Health and Social StudiesNijmegenNetherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Barratt J, Thomas N. Nurse practitioner consultations in primary health care: an observational interaction analysis of social interactions and consultation outcomes. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2018; 20:e37. [PMID: 29979148 PMCID: PMC6536749 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423618000427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the discrete nature of social interactions occurring in nurse practitioner consultations and investigate the relationship between consultation social interaction styles (biomedical and patient-centred) and the outcomes of patient satisfaction, patient enablement, and consultation time lengths. METHODS A case study-based observational interaction analysis of verbal social interactions, arising from 30 primary health care nurse practitioner consultations, linked with questionnaire measures of patient satisfaction and enablement. RESULTS A significant majority of observed social interactions used patient-centred communication styles (P=0.005), with neither nurse practitioners nor patients or carers being significantly more verbally dominant. Nurse practitioners guided the sequence of consultation interaction sequences, but patients actively participated through interactions such as asking questions. Usage of either patient-centred or biomedical interaction styles were not significantly associated with increased levels of patient satisfaction or patient enablement. The median consultation time length of 10.1 min (quartiles 8.2, 13.7) was not significantly extended by high levels of patient-centred interactions being used in the observed consultations. CONCLUSION High usage levels of patient-centred interaction styles are not necessarily contingent upon having longer consultation times available, and clinicians can encourage patients to use participatory interactions, whilst still then retaining overall guidance of the phased sequences of consultations, and not concurrently extending consultation time lengths. This study adds to the body of nurse practitioner consultation communication research by providing a more detailed understanding of the nature of social interactions occurring in nurse practitioner consultations, linked to the outcomes of patient satisfaction and enablement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Barratt
- Head of Community Nursing and Workforce Development, Institute of Health, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Nicola Thomas
- Professor of Kidney Care, School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
van Vugt SF, van de Pol AC, Cleveringa FGW, Stellato RK, Kappers MP, de Wit NJ, Damoiseaux RAMJ. A case study of nurse practitioner care compared with general practitioner care for children with respiratory tract infections. J Adv Nurs 2018; 74:2106-2114. [PMID: 29754411 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To compare quality of care provided by nurse practitioners (NP) with care provided by general practitioners (GP) for children with respiratory tract infections (RTI) in the Netherlands. BACKGROUND Nurse practitioners increasingly manage acute conditions in general practice, with opportunities for more protocolled care. Studies on quality of NPs' care for children with RTIs are limited to the US healthcare system and do not take into account baseline differences in illness severity. DESIGN Retrospective observational cohort study. METHODS Data were extracted from electronic healthcare records of children 0-6 years presenting with RTI between January-December 2013. Primary outcomes were antibiotic prescriptions and early return visits. Generalized estimating equations were used to correct for potential confounders. RESULTS A total of 899 RTI consultations were assessed (168 seen by NP; 731 by GP). Baseline characteristics differed between these groups. Overall antibiotic prescription and early return visit rates were 21% and 24%, respectively. Adjusted odds ratio for antibiotic prescription after NP vs. GP delivered care was 1.40 (95% confidence interval 0.89-2.22) and for early return visits 1.53 (95% confidence interval 1.01-2.31). Important confounder for antibiotic prescription was illness severity. Presence of wheezing was a confounder for return visits. Complication and referral rates did not differ. CONCLUSION Antibiotic prescription, complication and referral rates for paediatric RTI consultations did not differ significantly between NP and GP consultations, after correction for potential confounders. General practitioners, however, see more severely ill children and have a lower return visit rate. A randomised controlled study is needed to determine whether NP care quality is truly noninferior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia F van Vugt
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alma C van de Pol
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frits G W Cleveringa
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca K Stellato
- Department of Biostatistics and Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke P Kappers
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Niek J de Wit
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roger A M J Damoiseaux
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Contandriopoulos D, Perroux M, Cockenpot A, Duhoux A, Jean E. Analytical typology of multiprofessional primary care models. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2018; 19:44. [PMID: 29621992 PMCID: PMC5887224 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0731-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Background There is only limited evidence to support care redefinition and role optimization processes needed for scaling up of a stronger primary care capacity. Methods Data collection was based on a keyword search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. Three thousand, two hundred and twenty-nine documents were identified, 1851 met our inclusion criteria, 71 were retained for full-text assessment and 52 included in the final selection. The analysis process was done in four steps. In the end, the elements that were identified as particularly central to the process of transforming primary care provision were used as the basis of two typologies. Results The first typology is based on two structural dimensions that characterize promising multiprofessional primary care teams. The first is the degree to which the division of tasks in the team was formalized. The second dimension is the centrality and autonomy of nurses in the care model. The second typology offers a refined definition of comprehensiveness of care and its relationship with the optimization of professional roles. Conclusions The literature we analyzed suggests there are several plausible avenues for coherently articulating the relationships between patients, professionals, and care pathways. The expertise, preferences, and numbers of available human resources will determine the plausibility that a model will be a coherent response that is appropriate to the needs and environmental constraints (funding models, insurance, etc.). The typologies developed can help assess existing care models analytically or evaluatively and to propose, prospectively, some optimal operational parameters for primary care provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Contandriopoulos
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, British-Columbia, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
| | - Mélanie Perroux
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Aurore Cockenpot
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Arnaud Duhoux
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Jean
- School of Nursing, Université du Québec à Rimouski, 300, allée des Ursulines, C. P. 3300, succ. A, Rimouski, Québec, G5L 3A1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Frost J, Currie MJ, Cruickshank M, Northam H. Using the lens of enablement to explore patients’ experiences of Nurse Practitioner care in the Primary Health Care setting. Collegian 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2017.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
35
|
Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:e433-e440. [PMID: 29581130 PMCID: PMC6001981 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x695765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients attend primary care for many reasons and to achieve a range of possible outcomes. There is currently no Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) designed to capture these diverse outcomes, and trials of interventions in primary care may thus fail to detect beneficial effects. Aim This study describes the psychometric testing of the Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ), which was designed to capture a broad range of outcomes relevant to primary care. Design and setting Questionnaires were administered in primary care in South West England. Method Patients completed the PCOQ in GP waiting rooms before a consultation, and a second questionnaire, including the PCOQ and seven comparator PROMs, after 1 week. Psychometric testing included exploratory factor analysis on the PCOQ, internal consistency, correlation coefficients between domain scores and comparator measures, and repeated measures effect sizes indicating change across 1 week. Results In total, 602 patients completed the PCOQ at baseline, and 264 (44%) returned the follow-up questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis suggested four dimensions underlying the PCOQ items: health and wellbeing, health knowledge and self-care, confidence in health provision, and confidence in health plan. Each dimension was internally consistent and correlated as expected with comparator PROMs, providing evidence of construct validity. Patients reporting an improvement in their main problem exhibited small to moderate improvements in relevant domain scores on the PCOQ. Conclusion The PCOQ was acceptable, feasible, showed strong psychometric properties, and was responsive to change. It is a promising new tool for assessment of outcomes of primary care interventions from a patient perspective.
Collapse
|
36
|
Jarczyk KS, Pieper P, Brodie L, Ezzell K, D'Alessandro T. An Integrated Nurse Practitioner-Run Subspecialty Referral Program for Incontinent Children. J Pediatr Health Care 2018; 32:184-194. [PMID: 29289407 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2017.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence suggests that urinary and fecal incontinence and abnormal voiding and defecation dynamics are different manifestations of the same syndrome. This article reports the success of an innovative program for care of children with incontinence and dysfunctional elimination. This program is innovative because it is the first to combine subspecialty services (urology, gastroenterology, and psychiatry) in a single point of care for this population and the first reported independent nurse practitioner-run specialty referral practice in a free-standing pediatric ambulatory subspecialty setting. Currently, services for affected children are siloed in the aforementioned subspecialties, fragmenting care. METHODS Retrospective data on financial, patient satisfaction, and patient referral base were compiled to assess this program. RESULTS Analysis indicates that this model is fiscally sound, has similar or higher patient satisfaction scores when measured against physician-run subspecialty clinics, and has an extensive geographic referral base in the absence of marketing. DISCUSSION This model has potential transformative significance: (a) the impact of children achieving continence cannot be underestimated, (b) configuration of services that cross traditional subspecialty boundaries may have broader application to other populations, and (c) demonstration of effectiveness of non-physician provider reconfiguration of health care delivery in subspecialty practice may extend to the care of other populations.
Collapse
|
37
|
Murphy M, Hollinghurst S, Salisbury C. Qualitative assessment of the primary care outcomes questionnaire: a cognitive interview study. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:79. [PMID: 29391003 PMCID: PMC5796473 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2867-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ) is a new patient-reported outcome measure designed specifically for primary care. This paper describes the developmental process of improving the item quality and testing the face validity of the PCOQ through cognitive interviews with primary care patients. METHODS Two formats of the PCOQ were developed and assessed: the PCOQ-Status (which has an adjectival scale) and the PCOQ-Change (which has the same items as the PCOQ-Status, but a transitional scale). Three rounds of cognitive interviews were held with twenty patients from four health centres in Bristol. Patients seeking healthcare were recruited directly by their GP or practice nurse, and others not currently seeking healthcare were recruited from patient participation groups. An adjusted form of Tourangeau's model of cognitive processing was used to identify problems. This contained four categories: general comprehension, temporal comprehension, decision process, and response process. The resultant pattern of problems was used to assess whether the items and scales were working as intended, and to make improvements to the questionnaires. RESULTS The problems identified in the PCOQ-Status reduced from 41 in round one to seven in round three. It was noted that the PCOQ-Status seemed to be capturing a subjective view of health which might not vary with age or long-term conditions. However, as it is designed to be evaluative (measuring change over time) as opposed to discriminative (measuring change between different groups of people), this does not present a problem for validity. The PCOQ-Status was both understood by patients and was face valid. The PCOQ-Change had less face validity, and was misunderstood by three out of six patients in round 1. It was not taken forward after this round. CONCLUSIONS The cognitive interviews successfully contributed to the development of the PCOQ. Through this study, the PCOQ-Status was found to be well understood by patients, and it was possible to improve comprehension through each round of interviews. The PCOQ-Change was poorly understood and, given that this corroborates existing research, this may call into question the use of transitional questionnaires generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairead Murphy
- University of Bristol, Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Sandra Hollinghurst
- University of Bristol, Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- University of Bristol, Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Miani C, Martin A, Exley J, Doble B, Wilson E, Payne R, Avery A, Meads C, Kirtley A, Jones MM, King S. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of issuing longer versus shorter duration (3-month vs. 28-day) prescriptions in patients with chronic conditions: systematic review and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2017; 21:1-128. [PMID: 29268843 PMCID: PMC5757186 DOI: 10.3310/hta21780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To reduce expenditure on, and wastage of, drugs, some commissioners have encouraged general practitioners to issue shorter prescriptions, typically 28 days in length; however, the evidence base for this recommendation is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the evidence of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shorter versus longer prescriptions for people with stable chronic conditions treated in primary care. DESIGN/DATA SOURCES The design of the study comprised three elements. First, a systematic review comparing 28-day prescriptions with longer prescriptions in patients with chronic conditions treated in primary care, evaluating any relevant clinical outcomes, adherence to treatment, costs and cost-effectiveness. Databases searched included MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Searches were from database inception to October 2015 (updated search to June 2016 in PubMed). Second, a cost analysis of medication wastage associated with < 60-day and ≥ 60-day prescriptions for five patient cohorts over an 11-year period from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Third, a decision model adapting three existing models to predict costs and effects of differing adherence levels associated with 28-day versus 3-month prescriptions in three clinical scenarios. REVIEW METHODS In the systematic review, from 15,257 unique citations, 54 full-text papers were reviewed and 16 studies were included, five of which were abstracts and one of which was an extended conference abstract. None was a randomised controlled trial: 11 were retrospective cohort studies, three were cross-sectional surveys and two were cost studies. No information on health outcomes was available. RESULTS An exploratory meta-analysis based on six retrospective cohort studies suggested that lower adherence was associated with 28-day prescriptions (standardised mean difference -0.45, 95% confidence interval -0.65 to -0.26). The cost analysis showed that a statistically significant increase in medication waste was associated with longer prescription lengths. However, when accounting for dispensing fees and prescriber time, longer prescriptions were found to be cost saving compared with shorter prescriptions. Prescriber time was the largest component of the calculated cost savings to the NHS. The decision modelling suggested that, in all three clinical scenarios, longer prescription lengths were associated with lower costs and higher quality-adjusted life-years. LIMITATIONS The available evidence was found to be at a moderate to serious risk of bias. All of the studies were conducted in the USA, which was a cause for concern in terms of generalisability to the UK. No evidence of the direct impact of prescription length on health outcomes was found. The cost study could investigate prescriptions issued only; it could not assess patient adherence to those prescriptions. Additionally, the cost study was based on products issued only and did not account for underlying patient diagnoses. A lack of good-quality evidence affected our decision modelling strategy. CONCLUSIONS Although the quality of the evidence was poor, this study found that longer prescriptions may be less costly overall, and may be associated with better adherence than 28-day prescriptions in patients with chronic conditions being treated in primary care. FUTURE WORK There is a need to more reliably evaluate the impact of differing prescription lengths on adherence, on patient health outcomes and on total costs to the NHS. The priority should be to identify patients with particular conditions or characteristics who should receive shorter or longer prescriptions. To determine the need for any further research, an expected value of perfect information analysis should be performed. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015027042. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Miani
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adam Martin
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Josephine Exley
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brett Doble
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ed Wilson
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rupert Payne
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Anthony Avery
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Catherine Meads
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Kirtley
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
- Strategy Division, Wellcome Trust, London, UK
| | - Molly Morgan Jones
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah King
- Cambridge Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Norton
- St Mark's Hospital, Northwick Park, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Call to action: APRNs in U.S. nursing homes to improve care and reduce costs. Nurs Outlook 2017; 65:689-696. [DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 08/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
41
|
Bezem J, Kocken PL, Kamphuis M, Theunissen MHC, Buitendijk SE, Numans ME. Triage in preventive child healthcare: a prospective cohort study of care use and referral rates for children at risk. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016423. [PMID: 29084789 PMCID: PMC5665215 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A novel triage approach to routine assessments was introduced to improve the efficiency of Preventive Child Healthcare (PCH): PCH assistants carried out pre-assessments of all children and sent the children with suspected health problems to follow-up assessments conducted by a physician or nurse. This two-step approach differed from the usual approach, in which physicians or nurses assessed all children. This study was aimed to examine the impact of triage and task shifting on care for children at risk identified by PCH or parents and schools. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS An observational prospective cohort design was used, with an analysis of the basic registration data from the preventive health assessments for 1897 children aged 5 to 6, and 10 to 11, years from a sample of 41 schools stratified by socioeconomic status, region of PCH service and urbanisation. SETTING A comparison was made between two PCH services in the Netherlands that used the triage approach and two PCH services that provided the usual approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measures were the referral rates to either additional PCH assessments or external services. The secondary outcome measures were the rates of PCH assessments requested by, for example, parents and schools. RESULTS Overall, a higher referral rate to additional PCH assessments was found for the triage approach than for the usual approach (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.6), mainly in the age group of 5 to 6 years (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.7). We found a lower rate of referral to external services in the triage approach (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.7) and a higher referral rate to PCH assessments on request (OR=4.6, 95% CI 3.0 to 7.0). CONCLUSIONS The triage approach provides extra opportunities to deliver PCH assessments and PCH assessments on request for children at risk. Further research is needed into the cost benefits of the triage approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Bezem
- Preventive Child Health Care Department, Gelderland-Midden Municipal Health Service, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Child Health, TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Paul L Kocken
- Department of Child Health, TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mascha Kamphuis
- Zuid Holland West Municipal Health Service, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mattijs E Numans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Viewing Nurse Practitioners’ Perceptions of Patient Care Through the Lens of Enablement. J Nurse Pract 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
43
|
Wasan KM, Berry L, Kalra J. Physician centric healthcare: is it time for a paradigm shift? Med Chir Trans 2017; 110:295-296. [DOI: 10.1177/0141076817707337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kishor M Wasan
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A2, Canada
- Office of the Vice Provost Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A2, Canada
| | - Lois Berry
- Office of the Vice Provost Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A2, Canada
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A2, Canada
| | - Jawahar Kalra
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wong I, Wright E, Santomauro D, How R, Leary C, Harris M. Implementing two nurse practitioner models of service at an Australian male prison: A quality assurance study. J Clin Nurs 2017. [PMID: 28639389 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To examine the quality and safety of nurse practitioner services of two newly implemented nurse practitioner models of care at a correctional facility. BACKGROUND Nurse practitioners could help to meet the physical and mental health needs of Australia's growing prison population; however, the nurse practitioner role has not previously been evaluated in this context. DESIGN A quality assurance study conducted in an Australian prison where a primary health nurse practitioner and a mental health nurse practitioner were incorporated into an existing primary healthcare service. The study was guided by Donabedian's structure, processes and outcomes framework. METHODS Routinely collected information included surveys of staff attitudes to the implementation of the nurse practitioner models (n = 21 staff), consultation records describing clinical processes and time use (n = 289 consultations), and a patient satisfaction survey (n = 29 patients). Data were analysed descriptively and compared to external benchmarks where available. RESULTS Over the two-month period, the nurse practitioners provided 289 consultations to 208 prisoners. The presenting problems treated indicated that most referrals were appropriate. A significant proportion of consultations involved medication review and management. Both nurse practitioners spent more than half of their time on individual patient-related care. Overall, multidisciplinary team staff agreed that the nurse practitioner services were necessary, safe, met patient need and reduced treatment delays. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that the implementation of nurse practitioners into Australian correctional facilities is acceptable and feasible and has the potential to improve prisoners' access to health services. Structural factors (e.g., room availability and limited access to prisoners) may have reduced the efficiency of the nurse practitioners' clinical processes and service implementation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Results suggest that nurse practitioner models can be successfully integrated into a prison setting and could provide a nursing career pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ides Wong
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Eryn Wright
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Qld, Australia.,Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Qld, Australia
| | - Damian Santomauro
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Qld, Australia.,Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Qld, Australia
| | - Raquel How
- Prison Health Services, West Moreton Hospital and Health Services, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Archerfield, Qld, Australia
| | - Christopher Leary
- Prison Health Services, West Moreton Hospital and Health Services, Department of Health, Queensland Government, Archerfield, Qld, Australia
| | - Meredith Harris
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Qld, Australia.,Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Wacol, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
The internationally present perpetual policy themes inhibiting development of the nurse practitioner role in the primary care context: An Australian–USA comparison. Collegian 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2016.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
46
|
Bezem J, van der Ploeg C, Numans M, Buitendijk S, Kocken P, van den Akker E. Preventive child health care at elementary school age: The costs of routine assessments with a triage approach. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176569. [PMID: 28445523 PMCID: PMC5405971 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triage in Preventive Child Health Care (PCH) assessments could further the efficient use of human resources and budgets and therefore make extra care possible for children with specific needs. We assessed the costs of routine PCH assessments with and without triage for children aged 5/6 years and 10/11 years. In a triage approach, PCH assistants conduct pre-assessments to identify children requiring follow-up assessments by a physician or nurse. In the usual approach, all children are assessed by a physician and an assistant (children aged 5/6 years) or a nurse (children aged 10/11 years). METHODS All the direct costs of conducting routine PCH assessments with the triage and usual approach were assessed using a bottom-up micro-costing approach. In four PCH services in the Netherlands, two using triage and two the usual approach, professionals completed questionnaires about time spent on assessments, including time related to non-attendance at assessments, the referral of children and administration. RESULTS The projected costs for PCH professionals working on PCH assessments amounted to €5.2 million per cohort of 100,000 children aged 5/6 years in the triage approach, and €7.6 million in the usual approach. The projected costs in both approaches for children aged 10/11 years were about €4 million per 100,000 children. CONCLUSION The triage approach to PCH resulted in a projected cost reduction of about one-third, compared with usual practice, for routine assessments by physicians of children aged 5/6 years. There are minimal cost savings in the group of children aged 10/11 years when nurses are involved and so other considerations such as workforce shortages would be required to justify a change to a triage approach. Further research is needed to investigate the differences in costs of care after the completion of the routine assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Bezem
- Municipal Health Service Gelderland-Midden, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mattijs Numans
- Public Health and Primary Care Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Kocken
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Public Health and Primary Care Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Elske van den Akker
- Medical Decision-Making Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Muench U, Perloff J, Thomas CP, Buerhaus PI. Prescribing Practices by Nurse Practitioners and Primary Care Physicians: A Descriptive Analysis of Medicare Beneficiaries. JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s2155-8256(17)30071-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
48
|
Terbovc A, Gomišček B. Obvladovanje dejavnikov tveganja za nastanek srčno-žilnih bolezni v referenčni ambulanti družinske medicine. OBZORNIK ZDRAVSTVENE NEGE 2017. [DOI: 10.14528/snr.2017.51.1.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Uvod: Model referenčnih ambulant družinske medicine prinaša spremembe v obravnavi pacientov. Namen raziskave je bil preučiti dejavnike tveganja, ki prispevajo k zmanjšanju nastanka srčno-žilnih bolezni z nefarmakološkimi ukrepi pri pacientih v referenčni ambulanti družinske medicine.
Metode: Narejena je bila retrogradna raziskava podatkov pacientov, ki so bili obravnavani v referenčnih ambulantah za srčno-žilno ogroženost. Naključni raziskovalni vzorec je obsegal 128 pacientov, ki so v obdobju od 1. maja do 25. avgusta 2014 v referenčni ambulanti družinske medicine opravili presejalni in kontrolni pregled. Podatki so bili analizirani z opisno statistiko in hi-kvadrat testom.
Rezultati: Pri obravnavanih pacientih so bili pri kontrolnem pregledu v primerjavi s presejalnim ugotovljeni višji deleži urejenih preiskovanih parametrov, in sicer pri krvnem tlaku (41,6 %), holesterolu (45,5 %) in krvnem sladkorju (53,3 %), zmanjšal se je tudi delež kadilcev, in sicer za 4 %. Visoka srčno-žilna ogroženost (20–40 %) se je pri kontrolni meritvi znižala na 28 %, zelo visoka na 6,6 %. Po obravnavi v ambulanti se je telesna aktivnost, izvajana od 2- do 4-krat na teden, povečala na 54,3 % oz. telesna aktivnost, izvajana 5-krat na teden, na 19,4 %. Statistično značilne razlike so se pokazale pri krvnem tlaku (χ2 = 8,780, p = 0,003) in holesterolu (χ2 = 4,781, p = 0,029).
Diskusija in zaključek: Po ambulantni obravnavi se je pri pacientih pomembno izboljšala vrednost nekaterih dejavnikov tveganja, kar je moč pripisati kakovostni obravnavi, ki jo omogoča model referenčnih ambulant, in vlogi diplomirane medicinske sestre v tem modelu.
Collapse
|
49
|
Stables RH, Booth J, Welstand J, Wright A, Ormerod OJM, Hodgson WR. A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare a Nurse Practitioner to Medical Staff in the Preparation of Patients for Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterisation: The Study of Nursing Intervention in Practice (SNIP). Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2017; 3:53-9. [PMID: 15053888 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2003.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2003] [Revised: 11/03/2003] [Accepted: 11/25/2003] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of initiatives have employed nurses in roles traditionally associated with the medical profession but few have been evaluated in prospective randomised studies. This paper reports the results of a randomised controlled trial to assess the performance of a nurse practitioner (NP), trained to prepare patients for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation. METHODS Eligible and consenting patients were randomised to preparation by either the NP or junior medical staff (JMS). The safety outcome measure was the rate of in-hospital major adverse clinical events including death, myocardial infarction and emergency bypass coronary surgery. Other outcome measures included rate of minor adverse events, cardiologist assessment of case preparation and presentation, patient satisfaction and duration of pre-admission clinic. RESULTS From April 1997 to May 1998 a series of 355 patients scheduled for elective, day-case, diagnostic cardiac catheterisation were screened. Of these, 345 patients were eligible for the study. A total of 339 patients consented to participate and were randomised. Major adverse clinical events occurred in 0/175 (0%) patients in the NP group and 2/161 (1.2%) patients in the JMS group. (Risk difference = -1.2%, upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval = +2.0%) The cardiologist's evaluation that the patient's preparation was acceptable was high in both groups: NP group 98.3% vs. JMS group 98.8%: P = 1.0). Patient satisfaction, assessed by questionnaire, was greater in the NP group (P = 0.04). The median duration of the pre-admission clinic visit was lower in the NP group 165 min vs. 185 min in the JMS group, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The preparation of patients for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation can be safely performed by an appropriately trained NP. This approach may be associated with improved patient satisfaction and reduced clinic duration times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R H Stables
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cooper R, Stoflet S. Diversity and consistency: The challenge of maintaining quality in a multidisciplinary workforce. J Health Serv Res Policy 2016; 9 Suppl 1:39-47. [PMID: 15006227 DOI: 10.1258/135581904322724121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Non-physician clinicians have become prominent providers of patient services within the practice of medicine. They include nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists, physician assistants, the alternative and complementary disciplines (chiropractic, naturopathy and acupuncture), mental health providers (psychologists, clinical social workers, counsellors and therapists) and specialty disciplines (optometrists, podiatrists, nurse anaesthetists and nurse–midwives). Although these various disciplines have differing histories and philosophic frameworks, which create distinctive approaches to patient care, they have shared a struggle to obtain recognition and autonomy through state licensure, to expand their state-granted practice prerogatives and to achieve broader reimbursement from third-party payers and managed care. Most entered into a growth spurt beginning in the early 1990s. All now provide care that not only overlaps that of physicians but that complements and supplements that care. The central question is, how does their care contribute to quality? The evidence thus far shows that non-physician clinicians throughout the range of disciplines can produce high-quality outcomes under particular circumstances. However, the strongest body of evidence is derived from care that is at the least complex end of the clinical spectrum or that is provided under the umbrella of physicians. Unfortunately, few studies have critically examined the outcomes of non-physician clinicians at the leading edge of their practice prerogatives and under conditions that are free of physician oversight. Thus, while the principle that they can deliver high quality care within the practice of medicine is unequivocally true, more research is needed to test this principle under conditions of greater clinical complexity and autonomy, and, pending the results of such research, caution must be exercised in applying this principle too broadly.
Collapse
|