Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study

Evaluating risk factors in recurrent pregnancy loss: A prospective cohort study and its impact on live birth outcomes

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects 1-2 % of all couples trying to conceive and is a challenging heterogeneous condition. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and impact of various risk factors in patients suffering from RPL. We performed a prospective cohort study including patients at the tertiary RPL Unit in the Capital Region of Denmark between 1st January 2000 and 1st January 2023. The main outcome of the study was the first pregnancy after referral and whether the pregnancy was ongoing at least to the 22nd gestational week. A total of 2555 patients were included in the study, out of whom 1892 patients achieved a pregnancy after referral to the RPL Unit. This resulted in 1103 live births (58.3 %) and 718 pregnancy losses (37.9 %). Maternal age, BMI, smoking status and the number of prior pregnancy losses were negatively correlated with the likelihood of achieving pregnancy. Furthermore, maternal age, prior pregnancy losses, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and uterine malformations were associated with reduced birth rates. Patients with secondary RPL had a higher birth rate compared to those with primary RPL, and patients with APS treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) demonstrated a significantly increased birth rate compared to untreated APS patients. These findings suggest that certain risk factors significantly impact the likelihood of achieving pregnancy and live birth following RPL, which can be used in patient guidance.

Managing couples with recurrent miscarriage: A narrative review and practice recommendations

There is significant variation in practice when managing couples with recurrent miscarriage (RM), with guidelines differing on the definition of RM, recommended investigations, and treatment options. In the absence of evidence-based guidance, and following on from a paper by the authors-FIGO Good Practice Recommendations on the use of progesterone in the management of recurrent first-trimester miscarriage-this narrative review aims to propose a global holistic approach. We present graded recommendations based on best available evidence.

Recurrent MiscarriageGreen-top Guideline No. 17

In this guideline, recurrent miscarriage has been defined as three or more first trimester miscarriages. However, clinicians are encouraged to use their clinical discretion to recommend extensive evaluation after two first trimester miscarriages, if there is a suspicion that the miscarriages are of pathological and not of sporadic nature. Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered testing for acquired thrombophilia, particularly for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies, prior to pregnancy. [Grade C] Women with second trimester miscarriage may be offered testing for Factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation and protein S deficiency, ideally within a research context. [Grade C] Inherited thrombophilias have a weak association with recurrent miscarriage. Routine testing for protein C, antithrombin deficiency and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation is not recommended. [Grade C] Cytogenetic analysis should be offered on pregnancy tissue of the third and subsequent miscarriage(s) and in any second trimester miscarriage. [Grade D] Parental peripheral blood karyotyping should be offered for couples in whom testing of pregnancy tissue reports an unbalanced structural chromosomal abnormality [Grade D] or there is unsuccessful or no pregnancy tissue available for testing. [GPP] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered assessment for congenital uterine anomalies, ideally with 3D ultrasound. [Grade B] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered thyroid function tests and assessment for thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies. [Grade C] Women with recurrent miscarriage should not be routinely offered immunological screening (such as HLA, cytokine and natural killer cell tests), infection screening or sperm DNA testing outside a research context. [Grade C] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be advised to maintain a BMI between 19 and 25 kg/m2 , smoking cessation, limit alcohol consumption and limit caffeine to less than 200 mg/day. [Grade D] For women diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome, aspirin and heparin should be offered from a positive test until at least 34 weeks of gestation, following discussion of potential benefits versus risks. [Grade B] Aspirin and/or heparin should not be given to women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. [Grade B] There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, while the treatment may carry a significant cost and potential risk. [Grade C] Resection of a uterine septum should be considered for women with recurrent first or second trimester miscarriage, ideally within an appropriate audit or research context. [Grade C] Thyroxine supplementation is not routinely recommended for euthyroid women with TPO who have a history of miscarriage. [Grade A] Progestogen supplementation should be considered in women with recurrent miscarriage who present with bleeding in early pregnancy (for example 400 mg micronised vaginal progesterone twice daily at the time of bleeding until 16 weeks of gestation). [Grade B] Women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage should be offered supportive care, ideally in the setting of a dedicated recurrent miscarriage clinic. [Grade C].

"It becomes your whole life"-Exploring experiences of reciprocal translocation carriers and their partners

Reciprocal translocation carriers are often diagnosed when they are experiencing difficulties conceiving or after a pregnancy affected by an unbalanced set of chromosomes inherited from the balanced carrier parent. Having a reciprocal translocation is not uncommon; carriers can benefit from reproductive options to achieve a healthy, chromosomally balanced, pregnancy. The aim of this study was to explore the lived experience of carriers and their partners. We conducted 13 semi-structured telephone interviews. Participants were recruited through Victorian Clinical Genetics Services and interviews took place between May and September 2020. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Reciprocal translocation carriers and their partners described long term emotional and reproductive impacts, with carrier status identified at the time of prenatal diagnosis having marked emotional consequences. Couples facing reproductive challenges found the diagnosis created uncertainty for their future. When considering a pregnancy, couples worried about experiencing a miscarriage; during pregnancy, there was a reluctance to have an invasive diagnostic procedure due to fearing the risk of losing an unaffected pregnancy. Adaptation to their new reality involved having access to accurate information, peer support and maintaining hope. Couples valued having the option to know the carrier status of their children. The complex impacts of carrying a reciprocal translocation highlight the importance of access to specialist genetic counseling services to ensure couples are supported in understanding the implications of their translocation.

The impact of semen parameters on ICSI and pregnancy outcomes in egg recipient cycles with PGT-A

BACKGROUND

The egg donation model offers an opportunity to isolate the male factor and evaluate its impact on IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of non-obstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection and pregnancy outcomes compared with severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia in egg recipient cycles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study, including 1594 patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection in egg recipient cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. The cohort was divided into three groups: couples with non-obstructive azoospermia accounting for 479 patients (30%); couples with severe oligozoospermia (sperm number <5 × 106 /mL), accounting for 442 patients (27.8%); couples with mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia, with sperm number >5 × 106 and <15 × 106 /mL, accounting for 673 patients (42.2%).

RESULTS

The fertilisation rate was significantly reduced in the non-obstructive azoospermia group as compared with the severe oligozoospermia and the mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group: 30.3% versus 63% and 77.3% (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders highlighted non-obstructive azoospermia as a negative predictor of obtaining a euploid blastocyst both per injected oocyte and per obtained blastocyst. The miscarriage rate in the non-obstructive azoospermia group was 11.8%; higher than the severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia groups (7% and 2.7%) (p < 0.05). The live birth rate per embryo transfer (ET) was significantly lower in the non-obstructive azoospermia group compared with the severe oligozoospermia and the mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group (20.4% vs. 30.3% and 35.4%, p < 0.05). The risk of preterm labour was significantly higher in the non-obstructive azoospermia group, compared with the severe oligozoospermia and mild-to-moderate oligozoospermia group (55.1% vs. 46.8% and 16.1%, p < 0.001), and this difference was observed in both singleton and twin pregnancies.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In our retrospective comparative study, non-obstructive azoospermia significantly affects early embryonic potential and live birth rates per cycle and per embryo transfer. It is also associated with higher risk of preterm birth. Future prospective multi-centre studies are needed to highlight the effect of sperm quality on ART and pregnancy outcomes.

Association between chromosome abnormities and prenatal diagnosis indicators screening in the second trimester of pregnancy

This study aimed to explore the prenatal indicators in the second trimester of pregnancy and their association with chromosome abnormities (CA) to guide decisions toward invasive diagnostic procedures. Pregnant women who underwent prenatal screening and underwent amniocentesis in the second trimester in our Hospital between June 2017 and February 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The reason for amniocentesis in prenatal screening and diagnoses was extracted from the charts. Finally, 3449 pregnant women were included. Of them, 181 were with CA confirmed by amniocentesis (i.e., the CA group), while 3268 were without CA (i.e., the non-CA group). Compared with the women in the non-CA group, those in the CA group were more likely to be older (30 [27,32] vs 29 [26,31], P < .001), had higher gestational weeks (20 [19,23] vs 19 [18,23], P = .008), an increased risk of advanced maternal age (AMA) (9.4% vs 2.2%, P < .001), had an increased risk of NIPT (IRN) (5.1% vs 1.9%, P < .001), had higher rates of a parental chromosome abnormality (PCA) (1.8% vs 0.9%, P = .002), and had increased risk of trisomy 21 (IRT21) (63.0% vs 45.3%, P < .001). AMA (OR = 4.22, 95% CI: 2.35-7.58, P < .001; AUC = 0.536), IRN (OR = 10.62, 95% CI: 6.66-16.94, P < .001; AUC = 0.589), PCA (OR = 4.77, 95% CI: 2.01-11.32, P < .001; AUC = 0.584), and IRT21 (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.89, P = .008; AUC = 0.515) were independently associated with CA. AMA, IRN, IRT21, and PCA during the second trimester were independently associated with CA, but their predictive values for CA were relatively low. Combining those indicators may improve the predictive value.

The association between chronic deciduitis and recurrent pregnancy loss

Chronic deciduitis (CD) is defined as the presence of lymphocytes or plasma cells in decidual tissue. CD suggests the presence of chronic endometritis (CE) which is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). In this study, we examined the role CD plays in RPL patients with aneuploid and euploid miscarriage. The frequency of CD in 49 RPL patients (22 euploid and 27 aneuploid miscarriages) and 17 control women was assessed and the subsequent live birth rate (LBR) in the presence and absence of CD were compared. When only one CD138-positive endometrial stromal plasma cell (ESPC) was found per high-power field (HPF), we diagnosed small-positive CD (Grade 1). When a cluster of two or more CD138-positive ESPCs was found per HPF, we diagnosed it as CD Grade 2. The prevalence of Grade 1 was 18.2% (4/22) in patients with euploid miscarriage, 37.0% (10/27) in patients with aneuploid miscarriage and 23.5% (4/17) in control women. The prevalence of Grade 2 was 45.5% (10/22) in patients with euploid miscarriage, 55.6% (15/27) in patients with aneuploid miscarriage and 23.5% (4/17) in control women. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of CD (p = 0.015). The LBR of patients with CD was similar to that of patients without CD. CD was associated with RPL, especially in patients with aneuploid miscarriage. However, since there was no difference in the LBR of patients with or without CD in the next pregnancy, it was unclear whether CD was a contributing cause of RPL.

Reproductive outcomes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology who are carriers of chromosomal abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine whether infertile couples who are carriers of chromosomal abnormalities have distinct cumulative clinical pregnancy and cumulative live birth rates among patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART).

METHODS

Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Department of Reproduction and Infertility in Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 112 couples were in the exposed group with chromosomal abnormalities, and 226 couples without chromosomal abnormalities were in the control group, totalling 338 cases enrolled from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020. The control group (infertile couples without chromosomal abnormalities) was 1:2 matched by female age, type of infertility (primary, secondary), and type of ART (IVF, ICSI, or IUI). The primary outcomes were cumulative clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate.

RESULTS

The results indicated that chromosome abnormalities did not lead to significant differences in primary outcomes. The overall cumulative clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate were not statistically different between the two groups (74.8% vs. 81.6%, p = .150) and (65.4% vs. 69.1%, p = .508). Further analysis revealed that there was also no significant difference in cumulative miscarriage rate between the two groups (13.9% vs. 20.3%, p = .213).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate or cumulative live birth rate between infertile couples with or without chromosomal abnormalities. KEY MESSAGESThe prevalence of infertility is rising year by year worldwide.Carriers of chromosomal abnormalities undergoing ART have the similar cumulative clinical pregnancy rate or cumulative live birth rate.The data we analysed have a certain significance for clinical decision-making involving ART for couples with chromosomal abnormalities, and it provides a meaningful reference for patients and physicians in the selection of PGT.

Systematic review of subsequent pregnancy outcomes in couples with parental abnormal chromosomal karyotypes and recurrent pregnancy loss

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current evidence of pregnancy outcomes among couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) with abnormal karyotypes vs. those with normal karyotypes and among couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes after receiving expectant management vs. preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Academic medical centers.

PATIENT(S)

Pregnancy outcomes in 6,301 couples with RPL who conceived without medical intervention in 11 studies were analyzed. However, only 2 studies addressed the outcomes of couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes after expectant management (75 cases) vs. PGD (50 cases).

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The pregnancy outcomes in couples with RPL with abnormal and normal karyotypes across included studies were evaluated.

RESULT(S)

Compared with those with a normal karyotype, a significantly lower first pregnancy live birth rate (LBR) was found in couples with RPL with abnormal karyotypes (58.5% vs. 71.9%; odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.65; I² =27%). A markedly decreased first pregnancy LBR was found in couples with a translocation (52.9% vs. 72.4%; OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.61; I² =33%) but not in couples with an inversion. However, the differences in accumulated LBR (81.4% vs. 74.8%; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-1.03; I² = 0) were nonsignificant, whereas the miscarriage rate was distinctly higher in couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes (53.0% vs. 34.7%; OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.69-2.89; I² = 0). Compared with those who chose expectant management, differences in accumulated LBR were nonsignificant (60% vs. 68%; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.11-2.62; I² =71%), whereas the miscarriage rate (24% vs. 65.3%; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.51; I² = 45) was markedly low in couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes who chose PGD.

CONCLUSION(S)

Couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes had a higher miscarriage rate than couples with normal karyotypes but achieved a noninferior accumulated LBR through multiple conception attempts. In couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes, PGD treatment did not increase the accumulated LBR but markedly reduced miscarriage rate compared with expectant management.

Can Lactobacillus spp. Be a Factor Reducing the Risk of Miscarriage?

Pregnancy loss is a common obstetric problem. Significant causes of miscarriage include genetic and epigenetic disorders of the embryo, immunological and endocrine factors, uterine malformations, improper embryo selection, and lifestyle. Perhaps a hitherto underappreciated cause of miscarriage may be an abnormal microbiota composition of the female reproductive system. Lactobacillus spp. is the most common bacteria within the reproductive tract. However, the protective role of Lactobacilli in the vagina has been well described in the literature, while it is still unknown what function Lactobacilli may have in the uterus. Moreover, new research shows that Lactobacillus spp. can have a role in miscarriage. However, both molecular and immunological mechanisms of host-Lactobacillus spp. interactions are not fully understood. Understanding these relationships will help address the importance and extent of the protective role of Lactobacillus spp. in miscarriage.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from preimplantation genetic testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) includes methods that allow embryos to be tested for severe inherited diseases or chromosomal abnormalities. In addition to IVF/ICSI and repeated freezing and thawing of the embryos, PGT requires a biopsy to obtain embryonic genetic material for analysis. However, the potential effects of PGT on obstetric and neonatal outcomes are currently uncertain.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This study aimed to investigate whether pregnancies conceived after PGT were associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with spontaneously conceived (SC) pregnancies or pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI.

SEARCH METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library entries from January 1990 to January 2021 were searched. The primary outcomes in this study were low birth weight (LBW) and congenital malformations (CMs), and the secondary outcomes included gestational age, preterm delivery (PTD), very preterm delivery (VPTD), birth weight (BW), very low birth weight (VLBW), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes, placenta previa and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM). We further pooled the results of PGT singleton pregnancies. Subgroup analyses included preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), cleavage-stage biopsy combined with fresh embryo transfer (CB-ET) and blastocyst biopsy combined with frozen-thawed embryo transfer (BB-FET).

OUTCOMES

This meta-analysis included 15 studies involving 3682 babies born from PGT pregnancies, 127 719 babies born from IVF/ICSI pregnancies and 915 222 babies born from SC pregnancies. The relative risk (RR) of LBW was higher in PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies (RR = 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.32-6.72), but the risk of CMs was not different between the two groups. The pooled results for the risks of LBW and CMs were similar in PGT and IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The risks of PTD (RR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.67-3.64) and HDP (RR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.18-4.47) were significantly higher in PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. Lower gestational age (mean difference [MD] = -0.76 weeks, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.34) and BW (MD = -163.80 g, 95% CI: -299.35 to -28.24) were also noted for PGT pregnancies compared with SC pregnancies. Nevertheless, compared with IVF/ICSI pregnancies, the risks of VPTD and VLBW in PGT pregnancies were significantly decreased by 41% and 30%, respectively, although the risk of HDP was still significantly increased by 50% in PGT pregnancies compared with IVF/ICSI pregnancies. The combined results of obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT and IVF/ICSI singleton pregnancies were consistent with the overall results. Further subgroup analyses indicated that both PGD and PGS pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of PTD and a lower gestational age compared with SC pregnancies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This meta-analysis showed that PGT pregnancies may be associated with increased risks of LBW, PTD and HDP compared with SC pregnancies. The overall obstetric and neonatal outcomes of PGT pregnancies are favourable compared with those of IVF/ICSI pregnancies, although PGT pregnancies were associated with a higher risk of HDP. However, because the number of studies that could be included was limited, more randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Analysis of parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype and subsequent live births in Chinese couples with recurrent pregnancy loss

The frequency and distribution of chromosomal abnormalities and the impact of parental chromosomal aberration on the pregnancy outcomes of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss remains controversial. 3235 RPL couples who experienced two or more miscarriages before 20 weeks were diagnosed in our tertiary referral hospital during 2008–2018 and included in the single-center retrospective cohort study covering a 10-year period. Chromosome aberration was detected in 121 (3.74%) among 3235 RPL couples which included 75 female and 46 male cases at an individual level. 101 cases were structural aberrations including balanced translocations in 46(38.0%) cases, Robertsonian translocations in 13(10.7%) cases, inversions in 42(34.7%) cases and 20(16.5%) cases were numerical aberrations. 121 carriers and 428 non-carriers were followed up for two years, 55 carriers and 229 non-carriers were subsequent pregnant after diagnosis by natural conception or intrauterine insemination. The frequency of carriers to have a health newborn was not significantly different with non-carriers (72.7% vs. 71.2%, adjusted P = 0.968). This study described the majority of carriers were balanced translocations and chromosome aberrations had a limited influence on live birth rate from the present data. The results of the study also remind us that natural conception may be also a good alternative rather than PGD (Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis) which is common in many other reproductive centers for such patients.

PGT-SR (reciprocal translocation) using trophectoderm sampling and next-generation sequencing: insights from a virtual trial

PURPOSE

The objective of this virtual study was to simulate a full cycle and assess the costs and benefits to a couple with a reciprocal translocation, using current techniques for preimplantation genetic testing and comparing reporting every chromosome with only reporting those involved in the rearrangement.

METHODS

A simulation was constructed for women under the age of 35 years, where vitrified-warmed embryos were transferred one at a time in a first full cycle following preimplantation genetic testing using next-generation sequencing and sampling the trophectoderm at the blastocyst stage. The effect on pregnancy outcomes (live birth, clinical miscarriage and biochemical pregnancy) was evaluated for different reporting strategies for embryo transfer to (i) report only the rearranged chromosomes and transfer embryos with a normal or balanced test result for the translocation (targeted), or (ii) report every chromosome and exclude from transfer all embryos with an abnormal test result (exclusion), or (iii) exclude only those consistent with an unbalanced translocation and/or unrelated non-mosaic whole-chromosome aneuploidy and assign those with samples consistent with a normal or balanced translocation complement and unrelated mosaic aneuploidy or segmental imbalance (embryos of uncertain reproductive potential) a lower transfer priority (ranking). The number of individual women whom might benefit by avoiding an adverse pregnancy outcome (biochemical pregnancy, clinical miscarriage) or be disadvantaged by not achieving a live birth was evaluated. The financial cost of the different reporting strategies and the time taken to complete a cycle were also considered.

RESULTS

The simulation showed that compared to only reporting the translocation chromosomes (targeted reporting), testing every chromosome and ranking embryos by test result for transfer was a cost-effective strategy to avoid an adverse pregnancy without compromising the chance of a live birth. Excluding from transfer embryos with a test result consistent with a normal or balanced translocation complement of uncertain reproductive potential was an inferior strategy because it resulted in fewer live births from a full cycle. Reporting only the translocation chromosomes was an inferior strategy because it was less effective than ranked reporting of every chromosome to avoid an adverse pregnancy. Compared to targeted reporting, the ranked and exclusion strategies marginally reduced the overall cost and time taken to complete a full cycle. The ranking strategy avoided 1 adverse pregnancy for 12 cycles started, compared to 1 in 10 for the exclusion strategy which also resulted in 1 in 22 fewer women achieving a live birth. A minority (< 10%) of couples benefited by avoiding at least 1 adverse pregnancy whilst also reducing the time and cost for a complete cycle; most (> 70% ) couples received no benefit additional to targeted reporting and had the same outcome for pregnancy, time and cost.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary objective of PGT-SR for couples with a reciprocal translocation is to avoid a pregnancy with a chromosomally unbalanced product of the translocation and to reduce the risk of miscarriage, at least to that expected for couples with normal karyotypes. Trophectoderm sampling at the blastocyst stage with testing using NGS is an effective approach; however, ranking and excluding from transfer embryos with abnormal test results for unrelated chromosomes is problematical and is likely to be detrimental to achieving a live birth. Targeted reporting, where only the results of the chromosomes involved in the translocation are known, should be preferred to achieve a live birth. A best effort should be made to follow up and investigate all pregnancies following PGT-SR. Once the reproductive outcome is known (biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, live birth), the chromosomes unrelated to the rearrangement can be analysed as an experimental study. The risk/benefit of avoiding an adverse pregnancy vs reducing the chance of a healthy delivery should be a decision for each individual couple and informed by appropriate genetic counselling for their specific translocation and history.

Effects of chromosomal abnormalities on pregnancy outcomes in female undergoing artificial insemination with donor's sperm

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors for pregnancy of female with chromosomal abnormalities (CAs) after artificial insemination with donor's sperm (AID) treatment.A retrospective case-control study was analyzed by using the data of 29 female patients with CA and 116 controlled patients with normal karyotype (1:4 ratio) who underwent AID cycles at Guangdong Family Planning Special Hospital from January 2011 to December 2017. In all cases, reproductive histories were collected, and the cytogenetic analysis was performed by Trypsin-Giemsa banding and karyotyping. The embryos were fertilized via intracervical or intrauterine insemination. Clinical characteristic variables were compared.The prevalence of CA was found to be 0.29% in the whole AID population. The live birth rates of CA group and controlled group were 41.4% and 31.0% (P = .29) respectively. Compared to normal karyotype group, patients with CA showed higher rate of primary infertility (93.1% vs 75.9%, P = .049); Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ovarian stimulation (odds ratio, 3.055; 95% confidence interval, 1.421-6.568; P = .004) was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in female patients with AID treatment.For the infertility CA patients who were phenotypically normal, AID was a suitable choice, whereas ovarian stimulation results in an improvement in the pregnancy rate.

Recurrent miscarriage: evidence to accelerate action

Women who have had repeated miscarriages often have uncertainties about the cause, the likelihood of recurrence, the investigations they need, and the treatments that might help. Health-care policy makers and providers have uncertainties about the optimal ways to organise and provide care. For this Series paper, we have developed recommendations for practice from literature reviews, appraisal of guidelines, and a UK-wide consensus conference that was held in December, 2019. Caregivers should individualise care according to the clinical needs and preferences of women and their partners. We define a minimum set of investigations and treatments to be offered to couples who have had recurrent miscarriages, and urge health-care policy makers and providers to make them universally available. The essential investigations include measurements of lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, thyroid function, and a transvaginal pelvic ultrasound scan. The key treatments to consider are first trimester progesterone administration, levothyroxine in women with subclinical hypothyroidism, and the combination of aspirin and heparin in women with antiphospholipid antibodies. Appropriate screening and care for mental health issues and future obstetric risks, particularly preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and stillbirth, will need to be incorporated into the care pathway for couples with a history of recurrent miscarriage. We suggest health-care services structure care using a graded model in which women are offered online health-care advice and support, care in a nurse or midwifery-led clinic, and care in a medical consultant-led clinic, according to clinical needs.

Recurrent Spontaneous Miscarriage: a Comparison of International Guidelines

While roughly 30% of all women experience a spontaneous miscarriage in their lifetime, the incidence of recurrent (habitual) spontaneous miscarriage is 1 – 3% depending on the employed definition. The established risk factors include endocrine, anatomical, infection-related, genetic, haemostasis-related and immunological factors. Diagnosis is made more difficult by the sometimes diverging recommendations of the respective international specialist societies. The present study is therefore intended to provide a comparison of existing international guidelines and recommendations. The guidelines of the ESHRE, ASRM, the DGGG/OEGGG/SGGG and the recommendations of the RCOG were analysed. It was shown that investigation is indicated after 2 clinical pregnancies and the diagnosis should be made using a standardised timetable that includes the most frequent causes of spontaneous miscarriage. The guidelines concur that anatomical malformations, antiphospholipid syndrome and thyroid dysfunction should be excluded. Moreover, the guidelines recommend carrying out pre-conception chromosomal analysis of both partners (or of the aborted material). Other risk factors have not been included in the recommendations by all specialist societies, on the one hand because of a lack of diagnostic criteria (luteal phase insufficiency) and on the other hand because of the different age of the guidelines (chronic endometritis). In addition, various economic and consensus aspects in producing the guidelines influence the individual recommendations. An understanding of the underlying decision-making process should lead in practice to the best individual diagnosis and resulting treatment being offered to each couple.

Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing and microdissecting junction region in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to summarize the clinical outcomes of apparently balanced chromosome rearrangement (ABCR) carriers in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles by next-generation sequencing following microdissecting junction region (MicroSeq) to distinguish non-carrier embryos from balanced carriers.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 762 ABCR carrier couples who requested PGT for structural rearrangements combined with MicroSeq at the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya was conducted between October 2014 and October 2019.

RESULTS

Trophectoderm biopsy was performed in 4122 blastocysts derived from 917 PGT-SR cycles and 3781 blastocysts were detected. Among the 3781 blastocysts diagnosed, 1433 (37.9%, 1433/3781) were balanced, of which 739 blastocysts were carriers (51.57%, 739/1433) and 694 blastocysts were normal (48.43%, 694/1433). Approximately 26.39% of cycles had both carrier and normal embryo transfer, and the average number of biopsied blastocysts was 6.7. In the cumulative 223 biopsied cycles with normal embryo transfer, all couples chose to transfer the normal embryos. In the 225 cycles with only carrier embryos, the couples chose to transfer the carrier embryos in 169/225 (75.11%) cycles. A total of 732 frozen embryo transfer cycles were performed, resulting in 502 clinical pregnancies. Cumulatively, 326 babies were born; all of these babies were healthy and free of any developmental issues.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides the first evaluation of the clinical outcomes of a large sample with ABCR carrier couples undergoing the MicroSeq-PGT technique and reveals its powerful ability to distinguish between carrier and non-carrier balanced embryos.

Evaluation of Chromosomal Structural Anomalies in Fertility Disorders

Background and objectives: Reproductive disorders may occur not only due to environmental factors (air pollution, stressful lifestyle, previous abortions or the use of contraceptives) but also due to genetic factors. Materials and Methods: The aim of the study was to identify the range and frequency of chromosomal aberrations in couples (n = 99) with infertility or recurrent miscarriages in Lithuania. The data were collected from the out-patient medical histories. The couples were divided into three groups based on pregnancy, childbirth and the number of miscarriages. The Chi-square test was used to carry out the statistical analysis, and the statistical significance was (p < 0.05). Results: There were 6.6% (n = 13) structural changes observed in the karyotype tests. Chromosomal aberrations were found in 3% (n = 6) of the subjects, while 3.6% (n = 7) of them had chromosomal length polymorphisms. No difference was found between the aberration frequency in the karyotypes of men and women (p > 0.05). The most common aberrations were balanced translocations (23.1%, n = 3) which accounted for 15.4% of the reciprocal (n = 2) and 7.7% of the Robertsonian type (n = 1) of translocations. The most frequent aberrations were found in couples with the inability to conceive (42.9% (n = 3), p = 0.031). The childless couples and those with recurrent miscarriages showed an aberration rate of 8.2% (n = 5), while in the couples with at least one child it was 16.1% (n = 5). The group of couples unable to conceive had a significantly higher aberration rate of 28.6% (n = 2), p = 0.029. Miscarriages in partners' families accounted for 8.1%. Miscarriages on the female side of the family accounted for 4.5% (n = 9), on the male side it accounted for 2.5% (n = 5) and on both sides it accounted for 1.1% (n = 2). There were no statistically significant differences observed between the female and male sides (p > 0.05). The miscarriages observed in the second group of couples (childless with ≥2 miscarriages) were more frequent at 18.1% (n = 11), in the third group (having children ≥2 miscarriages) they were less frequent at 12.9% (n = 4), while no miscarriages were recorded in the first group of infertile couples. In total, 3% of the identified significant chromosomal aberrations were likely to trigger miscarriages or the inability to conceive. Conclusions: In couples with reproductive disorders, chromosomal mutations and chromosomal length polymorphisms were found at similar rates: 3% vs. 3.6%. The highest aberration rate was found in couples that were unable to conceive, a lower one was found in a group with children and ≥2 miscarriages, and the lowest one was found in a childless group of subjects with ≥2 miscarriages. The miscarriage rate in partner families was 8.1%; however, no difference was found between the male and female sides.

Recurrent pregnancy loss

Recurrent pregnancy loss is a distressing pregnancy disorder experienced by ~2.5% of women trying to conceive. Recurrent pregnancy loss is defined as the failure of two or more clinically recognized pregnancies before 20-24 weeks of gestation and includes embryonic and fetal losses. The diagnosis of an early pregnancy loss is relatively straightforward, although progress in predicting and preventing recurrent pregnancy loss has been hampered by a lack of standardized definitions, the uncertainties surrounding the pathogenesis and the highly variable clinical presentation. The prognosis for couples with recurrent pregnancy loss is generally good, although the likelihood of a successful pregnancy depends on maternal age and the number of previous losses. Recurrent pregnancy loss can be caused by chromosomal errors, anatomical uterine defects, autoimmune disorders and endometrial dysfunction. Available treatments target the putative risk factors of pregnancy loss, although the effectiveness of many medical interventions is controversial. Regardless of the underlying aetiology, couples require accurate information on their chances of having a baby and appropriate support should be offered to reduce the psychological burden associated with multiple miscarriages. Future research must investigate the pathogenesis of recurrent pregnancy loss and evaluate novel diagnostic tests and treatments in adequately powered clinical trials.

Recurrent pregnancy loss: diagnostic workup after two or three pregnancy losses? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) occurs in 1–3% of all couples trying to conceive. No consensus exists regarding when to perform testing for risk factors in couples with RPL. Some guidelines recommend testing if a patient has had two pregnancy losses whereas others advise to test after three losses.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence on the prevalence of abnormal test results for RPL amongst patients with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. We also aimed to contribute to the debate regarding whether the investigations for RPL should take place after two or three or more pregnancy losses.

SEARCH METHODS

Relevant studies were identified by a systematic search in OVID Medline and EMBASE from inception to March 2019. A search for RPL was combined with a broad search for terms indicative of number of pregnancy losses, screening/testing for pregnancy loss or the prevalence of known risk factors. Meta-analyses were performed in case of adequate clinical and statistical homogeneity. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

OUTCOMES

From a total of 1985 identified publications, 21 were included in this systematic review and 19 were suitable for meta-analyses. For uterine abnormalities (seven studies, odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.79–1.27, I² = 0%) and for antiphospholipid syndrome (three studies, OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.86–1.25, I² = 0%) we found low quality evidence for a lack of a difference in prevalence of abnormal test results between couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. We found insufficient evidence of a difference in prevalence of abnormal test results between couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses for chromosomal abnormalities (10 studies, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55–1.10), inherited thrombophilia (five studies) and thyroid disorders (two studies, OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.06–4.56).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

A difference in prevalence in uterine abnormalities and antiphospholipid syndrome is unlikely in women with two versus three pregnancy losses. We cannot exclude a difference in prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities, inherited thrombophilia and thyroid disorders following testing after two versus three pregnancy losses. The results of this systematic review may support investigations after two pregnancy losses in couples with RPL, but it should be stressed that additional studies of the prognostic value of test results used in the RPL population are urgently needed. An evidenced-based treatment is not currently available in the majority of cases when abnormal test results are present.

Motives and considerations regarding PGT in couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality: a qualitative exploration

Purpose

This study aims to describe the motives and considerations of couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality deciding on preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).

Methods

A qualitative exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured dyadic interviews with 13 couples (N = 26) carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality. All couples had an informative consultation in our PGT centre in the Netherlands.

Results

Almost all couples considered PGT or natural conception combined with prenatal diagnosis (PND) as the only two reproductive options. Among several considerations mentioned, the majority indicated that the wish to increase the chance of a successful pregnancy was the most important motive to opt for PGT. All couples who opted for PGT had first tried to conceive spontaneously and entered the PGT programme because of their adverse experiences during these attempts (infertility, recurrent miscarriage, termination of pregnancy, birth of an affected child). Couples that refrained from PGT were of advanced maternal age and expressed the long trajectory of PGT as the main reason to refrain. If conceiving spontaneously would not lead to an ongoing pregnancy, these couples also indicated that they would use PGT.

Conclusion

This study shows that couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality consider PGT and spontaneous conception with PND as relevant reproductive options. They are looking for the option that is in their opinion the fastest way to establish a successful pregnancy. Information on the perceived pros and cons of PGT or spontaneous conception in these couples can help to optimize counselling and psychological support during the decision-making process.

Pregnancy outcomes of reciprocal translocation carriers with two or more unfavorable pregnancy histories: before and after preimplantation genetic testing

PURPOSE

To report the normal live birth and birth defect rates pre- and post- preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) in reciprocal translocation carriers who have experienced two or more unfavorable pregnancy histories.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 194 couples who underwent 265 PGT-SR cycles between January 2013 and August 2016. The rates of miscarriage, normal live birth, and birth defect pre- and post- PGT-SR treatment were recorded. The types of birth defect were also categorized.

RESULTS

Before PGT-SR treatment, the 194 couples with reciprocal translocation had a previous reproductive history consisting of 592 pregnancies in total: 496 (83.8%) were miscarriages; 29 (4.9%) ended by induced abortion due to unintended pregnancy; 36 (6.1%) had birth defects; and 17 (2.9%) were normal live births. After PGT-SR treatment, there were 118 clinical pregnancies. Of these pregnancies, 13 (11.0%) were miscarriages, 101 (85.6%) were normal live births, and 4 (3.4%) had birth defects. In total, 14 different disorders were noted in the prenatal and postnatal examinations. Before the PGT-SR treatment, multiple birth defects, central nervous system abnormalities, and congenital heart defects were the three most common congenital malformations. Excluding for methylmalonic acidemia, there were only single and mild birth defects after the PGT-SR treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

After the PGT-SR treatment, the reciprocal translocation carriers who had previously experienced two or more unfavorable pregnancy outcomes had a low risk of miscarriages and birth defects. The rate of normal live births per pregnancy was higher after PGT-SR treatment.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether pregnancies achieved with trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) have different risks of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with pregnancies achieved with IVF without biopsy.

DESIGN

Observational cohort.

SETTING

University-affiliated fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Pregnancies achieved via IVF with PGT (n = 177) and IVF without PGT (n = 180) that resulted in a live birth.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Maternal outcomes including preeclampsia and placenta previa and neonatal outcomes including birth weight and birth defects.

RESULT(S)

There was a statistically significant increase in the risk of preeclampsia among IVF+PGT pregnancies compared with IVF without PGT pregnancies, with an incidence of 10.5% versus 4.1% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.02; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.10, 8.29). The incidence of placenta previa was 5.8% in IVF+PGT pregnancies versus 1.4% in IVF without PGT pregnancies (aOR = 4.56; 95% CI, 0.93, 22.44). Similar incidences of gestational diabetes, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and postpartum hemorrhage were observed. IVF+PGT and IVF without PGT neonates did not have a significantly different gestational age at delivery or rate of preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal morbidities, or birth defects. All trends, including the significantly increased risk of preeclampsia in IVF+PGT pregnancies, persisted upon stratification of analysis to only singleton live births.

CONCLUSION(S)

To date, this is the largest and most extensively controlled study examining maternal and neonatal outcomes after trophectoderm biopsy. There was a statistically significant three-fold increase in the odds of preeclampsia associated with trophectoderm biopsy. Given the rise in PGT use, further investigation is warranted.

Genetic abnormalities and pregnancy loss

Genetic abnormalities, whether occurring in the conceptus or the parents, can predispose to sporadic or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Abnormalities in the conceptus include aneuploidy, copy number changes, skewed X inactivation, and single gene disorders or mutations. Among parents who suffer RPL, the best studied genetic cause is balanced chromosomal translocations. For evaluation of genetic abnormalities in cases of pregnancy loss, chromosomal microarray is more likely to yield interpretable results than karyotype due to cell culture failure. For parents, karyotype remains the standard since microarray may not detect truly balanced translocations. For those with an identified underlying genetic abnormality, preimplantation genetic testing has been proposed to optimize the live birth rate. This approach shows promise, but currently lacks supporting evidence. In summary, various genetic causes for recurrent pregnancy loss are known, but when such a cause is identified, the implications for management remain unclear.

Adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcome in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: Multiple imputation analyses with propensity score adjustment applied to a large-scale birth cohort of the Japan Environment and Children's Study

PROBLEM

Several studies have reported the increased risk of preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, and low birth weight in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). There have been a limited number of large population-based studies examining adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcome after RPL. Multiple-imputed analyses (MIA) adjusting for biases due to missing data is also lacking.

METHOD OF STUDY

A nationwide birth cohort study known as the "Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS)" was conducted by the Ministry of the Environment. The subjects consisted of 104 102 registered children (including fetuses or embryos).

RESULTS

No increased risk of a congenital anomaly, aneuploidy, neonatal asphyxia, or a small for date infant was observed among the children from women with a history of RPL. A novel increased risk of placental adhesion and uterine infection was found. The adjusted ORs using MIA in women with three or more PL were 1.76 (95% CI, 1.04-2.96) for a stillbirth, 1.68 (1.12-2.52) for a pregnancy loss, 2.53 (1.17-5.47) for placental adhesion, 1.87 (1.37-2.55) and 1.60 (.99-2.57) for mild and severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, respectively, 1.94 (1.06-3.55) for uterine infection, 1.28 (1.11-1.47) for caesarean section and .86 (.76-.98) for a male infant.

CONCLUSION

MIA better quantified the risk, which could encourage women who might hesitate to attempt a subsequent pregnancy.

Pregnancy outcomes among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and chromosomal aberration (CA) without PGD

Background:

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined by two or more failed clinical pregnancies. Three to four percent of the couples with RPL have chromosomal aberrations (CA) in at least one partner. The parent’s structural chromosomal abnormalities may cause an unbalanced karyotype in the conceptus which could lead to implantation failure, early or late pregnancy loss, or delivery of a child with severe physical and/or mental disabilities.

Objective:

To compare live birth rates of couples with CA to couples with normal karyotypes and to investigate medical and obstetric characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of couples with CA and RPL who attend an RPL clinic at a tertiary hospital.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study, including 349 patients with two or more consecutive pregnancy losses. The study group consisted of 52 patients with CA, and the control group consisted of 297 couples with normal karyotype. All patients were evaluated and treated in the RPL clinic at Soroka University Medical Center and had at least one subsequent spontaneous pregnancy.

Results:

The demographic and clinical characteristics were not found to be statistically different between the two groups. The group of carriers of CA had 28/52 (53.8%) live births in their index pregnancy vs. the normal 202/297 (68%) (P=0.067, CI 95%) in the control group. No statistically significant etiology was found between the study group and the control group. A statistically significant difference in live birth rates was found when comparing the total amount of pregnancies [index pregnancy (IP)+post index pregnancy (PIP)] between the study group and the control group (54.16% vs. 67.82%, respectively, P=0.0328).

Conclusion:

Patients with RPL and CA who have spontaneous pregnancies, have a good prognosis (63.4%) of a successful pregnancy with at least one of the pregnancies (index or post index) resulting in a live birth.

An economic analysis of chromosome testing in couples with children who have structural chromosome abnormalities

Background

Structural chromosome abnormalities can cause significant negative reproductive outcomes as they typically result in morbidity and mortality of newborns. The prevalence of structural chromosomal abnormalities in live births is at least 0.05%, of which many of them have parental origins. It is uncommon to predict structural chromosome abnormalities at birth in the first child but it is possible to prevent repeated abnormalities through screening and diagnostic programmes. This study will provide an economic analysis of the prenatal detection of these abnormalities.

Methods

A cost-benefit analysis using a decision analytic model was employed to compare the status quo (doing nothing) with two interventional strategies. The first strategy (Strategy I) is preconceptional screening plus amniocentesis, and the second strategy (Strategy II) is amniocentesis alone. The monetary values in Thai baht (THB) were adjusted to international dollars (I$) using purchasing power parity (PPP) (I$1 = THB 17.60 for the year 2013). The robustness of the results was tested by applying a probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Results

Both diagnostic strategies can reduce approximately 10.7–11.1 births with abnormal chromosomes per 1,000 diagnosed couples. The benefit cost ratios were 1.62 for Strategy I and 1.24 for Strategy II. Net present values per 1,000 diagnoses in couples were I$464,000 for Strategy I and I$267,000 for Strategy II. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that the cost-benefit analysis was sufficiently robust, confirming that both strategies provided higher benefits than costs.

Conclusions

Since the benefits of both diagnostic strategies exceeded their costs, both strategies are economical–with Strategy I being more economically attractive. Strategy I is superior to Strategy II because it decreases the risk of normal children potentially dying from the amniocentesis process.

Recurrent Miscarriage: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/050)

Purpose

Official guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (ÖGGG) and the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The aim of this guideline was to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of couples with recurrent miscarriage (RM). Recommendations were based on the current literature and the views of the involved committee members.

Methods

Based on the current literature, the committee members developed the statements and recommendations of this guideline in a formalized process which included DELPHI rounds and a formal consensus meeting.

Recommendations

Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with RM were compiled based on the international literature. Specific established risk factors such as chromosomal, anatomical, endocrine, hemostatic, psychological, infectious and immunological disorders were taken into consideration.

ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss

STUDY QUESTION

What is the recommended management of women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) based on the best available evidence in the literature?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The guideline development group formulated 77 recommendations answering 18 key questions on investigations and treatments for RPL, and on how care should be organized.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A previous guideline for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage was published in 2006 and is in need of an update.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The guideline was developed according to the structured methodology for development of ESHRE guidelines. After formulation of key questions by a group of experts, literature searches and assessments were performed. Papers published up to 31 March 2017 and written in English were included. Cumulative live birth rate, live birth rate and pregnancy loss rate (or miscarriage rate) were considered the critical outcomes.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Based on the collected evidence, recommendations were formulated and discussed until consensus was reached within the guideline group. A stakeholder review was organized after finalization of the draft. The final version was approved by the guideline group and the ESHRE Executive Committee.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The guideline provides 38 recommendations on risk factors, prevention and investigations in couples with RPL, and 39 recommendations on treatments. These include 60 evidence-based recommendations – of which 31 were formulated as strong recommendations and 29 as conditional – and 17 good practice points. The evidence supporting investigations and treatment of couples with RPL is limited and of moderate quality. Of the evidence-based recommendations, only 10 (16.3%) were supported by moderate quality evidence. The remaining recommendations were supported by low (35 recommendations: 57.4%), or very low quality evidence (16 recommendations: 26.2%). There were no recommendations based on high quality evidence. Owing to the lack of evidence-based investigations and treatments in RPL care, the guideline also clearly mentions investigations and treatments that should not be used for couples with RPL.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Several investigations and treatments are offered to couples with RPL, but most of them are not well studied. For most of these investigations and treatments, a recommendation against the intervention or treatment was formulated based on insufficient evidence. Future studies may require these recommendations to be revised.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The guideline provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice in RPL, based on the best evidence available. In addition, a list of research recommendations is provided to stimulate further studies in RPL. One of the most important consequences of the limited evidence is the absence of evidence for a definition of RPL.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings, with the literature searches and with the dissemination of the guideline. The guideline group members did not receive payment. J.E. reports position funding from CARE Fertility. S.L. reports position funding from SpermComet Ltd. S.M. reports research grants, consulting and speaker’s fees from GSK, BMS/Pfizer, Sanquin, Aspen, Bayer and Daiichi Sankyo. S.Q. reports speaker’s fees from Ferring. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

ESHRE Pages are not externally peer reviewed. This article has been approved by the Executive Committee of ESHRE.

Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to structural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a common, yet elusive, complication of pregnancy. Among couples at high risk of RPL, such as those carrying a structural chromosomal rearrangement, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been proposed as a tool to improve live birth rates and reduce the incidence of miscarriage; however, no clear consensus has been reached on its benefits in this population. This systematic review summarizes existing published research on the effect of PGD on pregnancy outcomes among carriers of chromosomal abnormalities with RPL. A comprehensive search of common databases was conducted, which yielded 20 studies. Meta-analysis was precluded owing to significant heterogeneity between studies. The primary outcome of interest was live birth rate (LBR), and a pooled total of 847 couples who conceived naturally had a LBR ranging from 25-71% compared with 26.7-87% among 562 couples who underwent IVF and PGD. Limitations of the study include lack of large comparative or randomized control studies. Patients experiencing RPL with structural chromosomal rearrangement should be counselled that good reproductive outcomes can be achieved through natural conception, and that IVF-PGD should not be offered first-line, given the unproven benefits, additional cost and potential complications associated with assisted reproductive technology.

Genetic Causes of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Pregnancy loss is one of the most common obstetric complications, affecting over 30% of conceptions. A considerable proportion of losses are due to genetic abnormalities. Indeed, over 50% of early pregnancy losses have been associated with chromosomal abnormalities. Most are due to de novo nondisjunctional events but balanced parental translocations are responsible for a small but important percentage of genetic abnormalities in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. In the past, assessment of genetic abnormalities was limited to karyotype performed on placental or fetal tissue. However, advances in molecular genetic technology now provide rich genetic information about additional genetic causes of and risk factors for pregnancy loss. In addition, the use of preimplantation genetic testing in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization has the potential to decrease the risk of pregnancy loss from genetic abnormalities. To date, efficacy is uncertain but considerable potential remains. This chapter will review what is known about genetic causes of recurrent pregnancy loss with a focus on novel causes and potential treatments. Remaining knowledge gaps will be highlighted.

Recurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives

Recurrent pregnancy loss is an important reproductive health issue, affecting 2%–5% of couples. Common established causes include uterine anomalies, antiphospholipid syndrome, hormonal and metabolic disorders, and cytogenetic abnormalities. Other etiologies have been proposed but are still considered controversial, such as chronic endometritis, inherited thrombophilias, luteal phase deficiency, and high sperm DNA fragmentation levels. Over the years, evidence-based treatments such as surgical correction of uterine anomalies or aspirin and heparin for antiphospholipid syndrome have improved the outcomes for couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. However, almost half of the cases remain unexplained and are empirically treated using progesterone supplementation, anticoagulation, and/or immunomodulatory treatments. Regardless of the cause, the long-term prognosis of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss is good, and most eventually achieve a healthy live birth. However, multiple pregnancy losses can have a significant psychological toll on affected couples, and many efforts are being made to improve treatments and decrease the time needed to achieve a successful pregnancy. This article reviews the established and controversial etiologies, and the recommended therapeutic strategies, with a special focus on unexplained recurrent pregnancy losses and the empiric treatments used nowadays. It also discusses the current role of preimplantation genetic testing in the management of recurrent pregnancy loss.

Genetics of recurrent miscarriage and fetal loss

Despite years of research, miscarriage, particularly when recurrent, continues to pose a medical challenge. An embryo chromosomal error is responsible for 50-60% of recurrent cases; however, up to 30-50% remains an enigma. Successful pregnancy involves different maternal physiologic changes and certain complex interactions between the fetus and the mother by cytokines, angiogenic mediators and hormones. To date, research lines have focused on genetic and epigenetic polymorphisms related mainly to immune response and inflammatory mediators, and have yielded a significant relationship between recurrent miscarriage and immune mechanisms. Thus, unknown causes of miscarriage could be due to an immune imbalance induced by T-helper Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines and regulatory T cells. Furthermore, these genes and mediators have long been suspected of being blood markers for the clinical diagnosis and management of miscarriage; however, more evidence is required for them to be included in medical practice and obstetric guidelines.

Associations of recurrent miscarriages with chromosomal abnormalities, thrombophilia allelic polymorphisms and/or consanguinity in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or recurrent spontaneous abortion is an obstetric complication that affects couples at reproductive age. Previous reports documented a clear relationship between parents with chromosomal abnormalities and both recurrent miscarriages and infertility. However, limited data is available from the Arabian Peninsula which is known by higher rates of consanguineous marriages. The main goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and thrombophilic polymorphisms, and to correlate them with RPL and consanguinity in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Cytogenetic analysis of 171 consent patients with RPL was performed by the standard method of 72-h lymphocyte culture and GTG banding. Allelic polymorphisms of three thrombophilic genes (Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin A20210G, MTHFR C677T) were performed using PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) and gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

Data analysis revealed that 7.6 % of patients were carrier of numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities. A high rate of translocations (46 %) was associated to increased incidence of RPL. A significant correlation between consanguineous RPL patients and chromosomal abnormalities (P < 0.05) was found. Both Factor V Leiden and Prothrombin A20210G allelic polymorphisms were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of RPL.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a strong association between RPL and the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and inherited thrombophilia. Given the high rate of consanguineous marriages in the Saudi population, these results underline the importance of systematic cytogenetic investigation and genetic counseling preferably at the premarital stage or at least during early pregnancy phase through preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).

The clinical utility of genetic testing of tissues from pregnancy losses

OBJECTIVE

To map the current testing being undertaken following pregnancy loss across the UK and to examine the clinical utility in terms of identifying a cause for the loss and in identifying couples at risk of an unbalanced liveborn child.

DESIGN

Retrospective audit.

SETTING

UK, for the year 2014.

POPULATION

An audit of 6465 referrals for genetic testing of tissue samples following pregnancy loss.

METHODS

Data were obtained by questionnaire from 15 UK regional genetics laboratories.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Data were analysed with respect to gestational age, the presence of identified fetal anomalies, methodologies used, abnormality rates and the presence of a parental balanced rearrangement.

RESULTS

Of 6465 referrals a genetic cause was identified in 22% of cases (before 12 weeks' gestation, in 47%; at 12-24 weeks, in 14%; after 24 weeks, in 6%). In 0.4% of cases a balanced parental rearrangement was identified where there was a risk of an affected liveborn child in a future pregnancy. Eighty percent of genetic imbalances identified were aneuploidy or triploidy and could be identified by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction alone. There was significant variation across the UK in acceptance criteria, testing strategies and thus level of resolution of testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing of tissues following pregnancy loss identifies a probable cause of fetal demise in 22% of cases, but it is of low clinical utility in identifying couples at risk of a future unbalanced liveborn child. A comprehensive multidisciplinary review is needed to develop proposals for an affordable and equitable service.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

UK audit of genetic testing of fetal loss shows variation in access to and resolution of analysis.

Etiology of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Saudi Females

Objective:

The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in Saudi couples attending a specialized RPL clinic at King Fahad Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.

Patients and Methods:

A total of 59 couples attending the RPL clinic between January 2010 and December 2013 and who had completed their workup and investigations for RPL were included in the study. Data were collected from patients’ charts and computer-based laboratory results.

Results:

Protein S deficiency was found in 47% of patients, a chromosomal abnormality in 6.7%, uterine abnormality in 12%, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in 12%, and antithrombin III and Protein C deficiency in 1.7%. However, no patient had Factor V Leiden mutation. In 39% of the patients, there was no identifiable cause, and therefore, they had been diagnosed as unexplained RPL.

Conclusion:

The most common cause of RPL was Protein S deficiency followed by congenital uterine anomalies and APS. Almost 40% of couples with RPL remain with unknown etiology.

Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis using FISH analysis for recurrent miscarriage in low-risk reciprocal translocation carriers

OBJECTIVE

To assess PGD outcome using FISH analysis in couples with a history of recurrent miscarriage associated with a parental carrier of reciprocal translocation.

STUDY DESIGN

Couples in whom one partner was a carrier of a reciprocal translocation and had a history of two or more miscarriages and a low risk of a live born offspring with an unbalanced chromosomal rearrangement, underwent PGD treatment between 2000 and 2012.

RESULTS

91 couples started 171 fresh and 11 frozen PGD cycles. Of the fresh cycles, 162 (95%) reached oocyte retrieval and 107 (63%) had embryo transfer. In 14 cycles (8%), surplus embryos were cryopreserved. Pregnancy was achieved in 52 fresh PGD cycles, leading to 20 miscarriages and 32 live births. Eleven frozen embryo transfer cycles resulted in two miscarriages and three live births. The overall live birth rate was 19% per fresh and frozen PGD cycle started (35/182) and miscarriage rate was 39% per pregnancy (22/57). The cumulative live birth rate was 32% per couple (29/91).

CONCLUSION

After PGD for recurrent miscarriage in low-risk reciprocal translocation carriers, the miscarriage risk remains high and chance of live birth is low. For those translocation carriers, natural conception may be a better option.

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Natural Conception: A Comparison of Live Birth Rates in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Associated with Translocation

BACKGROUND

Established causes of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) include antiphospholipid syndrome, uterine anomalies, parental chromosomal abnormalities, particularly translocations, and abnormal embryonic karyotypes. The number of centers performing preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for patients with translocations has steadily increased worldwide. The live birth rate with PGD was reported to be 27-54%. The live birth rate with natural conception was reported to be 37-63% on the first trial and 65-83% cumulatively. To date, however, there has been no cohort study comparing age and the number of previous miscarriages in matched patients undergoing or not undergoing PGD. Thus, we compared the live birth rate of patients with RPL associated with a translocation undergoing PGD with that of patients who chose natural conception.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

After genetic counseling, 52 patients who desired natural conception and 37 patients who chose PGD were matched for age and number of previous miscarriages and these comprised the subjects of our study. PGD was performed by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. The live birth rates on the first PGD trial and the first natural pregnancy after ascertainment of the carrier status were 37.8% and 53.8%, respectively (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.22-1.23). Cumulative live birth rates were 67.6% and 65.4%, respectively, in the groups undergoing and not undergoing PGD. The time required to become pregnancy was similar in both groups. PGD was found to reduce the miscarriage rate significantly. The prevalence of twin pregnancies was significantly higher in the PGD group. The cost of PGD was $7,956 U.S. per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

While PGD significantly prevented further miscarriages, there was no difference in the live birth rate. Couples should be fully informed of the similarity in the live birth rate, the similarity in time to become pregnancy, the advantages of PGD, such as the reduction in the miscarriage rate, as well as its disadvantages, such as the higher cost, and the advantages of a natural pregnancy, such as the avoidance of IVF failure. The findings presented here should be incorporated into the genetic counseling of patients with RPL and carrying a translocation.

Management of recurrent miscarriage

Recurrent miscarriage is classically defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. Many researchers have now revised this definition to two or more pregnancy losses because of the recent increase in the prevalence of childless couples. Established causes of recurrent miscarriage are antiphospholipid antibodies, uterine anomalies and abnormal chromosomes in either partner, particularly translocations. Antiphospholipid syndrome is the most important treatable cause of recurrent miscarriage. However, it is not yet established as to what kind of testing should be conducted in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Standardization of tests for antiphospholipid antibodies is needed. On the other hand, embryonic aneuploidy is the most frequent cause of recurrent miscarriage. Chromosome analysis of the embryo is important, because it has good predictive value for subsequent live birth. It is not necessary to give any medications for unexplained cases of recurrent miscarriage, and provision of psychological support may be the most important to encourage the couples to continue to conceive until a live birth results.

Robertsonian translocations: an overview of 872 Robertsonian translocations identified in a diagnostic laboratory in China

Robertsonian translocations (ROBs) have an estimated incidence rate of 1/1000 births, making this type of rearrangement the most common structural chromosomal abnormalities seen in the general population. In this study, we reports 872 cases of ROBs from 205,001 specimens karyotyped postnatally in a single accredited laboratory in China, including 583 balanced ROBs, 264 unbalanced ROBs, 9 mosaic ROBs, and 18 complex ROBs. Ninety-three percent of the balanced ROBs observed were adults with infertility, miscarriage, or offspring(s) with known chromosomal abnormalities. Significant excess of females were found to be carriers of balanced ROBs with an adjusted male/female ratio of 0.77. Ninety-eight percent of the unbalanced ROBs observed were children with variable referral reasons. Almost all of the unbalanced ROBs involved chromosome 21 except a single ROB with [46,XX,der(13;14),+13] identified in a newborn girl with multiple congenital anomalies. Multiple novel ROB karyotypes were reported in this report. This study represents the largest collections of ROBs in Chinese population.

Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD

STUDY QUESTION

Do clinical characteristics of recurrent miscarriage couples with a chromosomal abnormality and who opt for PGD differ from couples that decline PGD after extensive genetic counselling?

SUMMARY ANSWER

No differences in clinical characteristics are identified between recurrent miscarriage couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality who opt for PGD compared with those that decline PGD after extensive genetic counselling.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Couples who have experienced two or more miscarriages (recurrent miscarriage) are at increased recurrence risk if one of the partners carries a structural chromosomal abnormality. PGD can be offered to avoid (another) miscarriage or pregnancy termination when (invasive) prenatal diagnosis shows an abnormal result. To date, no reports are available that describe reproductive decision-making after genetic counselling on PGD in these specific couples.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Retrospective cohort study of 294 couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality seeking genetic counselling on PGD between 1996 and 2012.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Participants were recurrent miscarriage couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality. They had been referred for genetic counselling to the only national licensed PGD centre. Clinical characteristics analysed included couple associated characteristics, characteristics concerning reproductive history and external characteristics such as type of physician that referred the couple for genetic counselling and the clinical geneticist performing the counselling on PGD.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Of 294 couples referred for counselling on PGD, 26 were not accepted because they did not meet the criteria for IVF-PGD. The remaining cohort of 268 couples consisted of two-thirds female and one-third male carriers. Main PGD indications were reciprocal translocations (83.9%) and Robertsonian translocations (16.7%). Following genetic counselling, 76.9% of included couples chose PGD as their reproductive option, the others declined PGD. Reproductive choice is not influenced by sex of the translocation carrier (P = 0.499), type of chromosomal abnormality (P = 0.346), number of previous miscarriages (P = 0.882), history of termination of pregnancy (TOP) because of an unbalanced fetal karyotype (P = 0.800), referring physician (P = 0.208) or geneticist who performed the counselling (P = 0.410).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study only included recurrent miscarriage couples carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality, who were actually referred to a PGD clinic for genetic counselling. We lack information on couples who were not referred for PGD. Some of these patients may not have been informed on PGD at all, while others were not referred for counselling because they did not opt for PGD to start with.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study shows that reproductive choices in couples with recurrent miscarriage on the basis of a structural chromosomal abnormality are not influenced by characteristics of the couple itself, nor by their obstetric history or external characteristics. These findings suggest that a couples' intrinsic attitude towards PGD treatment is a major factor influencing their reproductive choice. Future research will focus on these personal motives that seem to push reproductive decision-making following genetic counselling in a given direction.

Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage is still a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic quagmire

Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage (RSM), affecting 1-2% of women of reproductive age seeking pregnancy, has been a clinical quagmire and a formidable challenge for the treating physician. There are many areas of controversy in the definition, aetiology, investigations and treatment of RSM. This review will address the many factors involved in the aetiology of RSM which is multifactorial in many patients, with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) being the most recognized aetiological factor. There is no identifiable cause in about 40-60% of these patients, in which case the condition is classified as idiopathic or unexplained RSM. The RSM investigations are extensive and should be undertaken in dedicated, specialized, well-equipped clinics/centres where services are provided by trained specialists. The challenges faced by the treating physician are even more overwhelming regarding the decision of what should be the most appropriate therapy offered to patients with RSM. Our review will cover the diverse modalities of therapy available including the role of preimplantation genetic testing using recent microarray technology, such as single nucleotide polymorphism and comparative genomic hybridization, as well as preimplantation genetic diagnosis; the greatest emphasis will be on the treatment of APS, and there will be important comments on the management of patients presenting with idiopathic RSM. The controversial areas of the role of natural killer cells in RSM, the varied modalities in the management of idiopathic RSM and the need for better-planned studies will be covered as well.