1
|
Feliciano DR, Reis-Pina P. Enhancing End-of-Life Care With Home-Based Palliative Interventions: A Systematic Review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 68:e356-e372. [PMID: 39002710 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Home-Based Palliative Care (HPC) interventions have emerged as a promising approach to deliver patient-centered care in familiar surroundings, aligning with patients' preferences and improving quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVES This review aimed to systematically assess the impact of HPC interventions on symptom management, QOL, healthcare resource utilization and place of death among patients with severe, progressive illnesses requiring end-of-life care. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies published between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2023. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of HPC interventions compared to usual care. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane tools. RESULTS Nine publications meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Findings indicate that HPC interventions, delivered by specialized teams or integrated care approaches, significantly improve QOL and increase the likelihood of patients dying at home. Moreover, HPC is associated with reduced healthcare utilization, including fewer hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and shorter hospital stays. No significant differences were observed in symptom management. CONCLUSION HPC interventions demonstrate significant benefits in addressing the complex needs of patients with advanced illnesses. These findings underscore the importance of integrating HPC into healthcare systems to optimize outcomes and promote quality end-of-life care. Future research should focus on expanding access to HPC services, enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, and incorporating patient preferences to further improve care delivery in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paulo Reis-Pina
- Faculty of Medicine (D.R.F., P.R.P.), University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; Bento Menni Palliative Care Unit (P.R.P.), Sintra, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johannesen EJD, Timm H, Róin Á. District nurses experiences in providing terminal care in rural and more urban districts. A qualitative study from the Faroe Islands. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:367-377. [PMID: 38483794 PMCID: PMC11332285 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2329207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore district nurses' experiences in providing terminal care to patients and their families until death in a private home setting. DESIGN, SETTING AND SUBJECTS Qualitative study. Data derived from focus group discussions with primary nurses in The Faroe Islands. RESULTS Four themes were identified: 'Challenges in providing terminal care', 'The importance of supporting families', 'Collaborative challenges in terminal care' and 'Differences between rural districts and urban districts'. The nurses felt that terminal care could be exhausting, but they also felt the task rewarding. Involving the family was experienced as a prerequisite for making home death possible. Good collaboration with the local GPs was crucial, and support from a palliative care team was experienced as helpful. They pointed out that changes of GP and the limited services from the palliative care team were challenging. Structural and economic conditions differed between urban and rural districts, which meant that the rural districts needed to make private arrangements regarding care during night hours, while the urban districts had care services around the clock. CONCLUSION Our findings underline the complexity of terminal care. The nurses felt exhausted yet rewarded from being able to fulfil a patient's wish to die at home. Experience and intuition guided their practice. They emphasised that good collaboration with the GPs, the palliative care team and the families was important. Establishing an outgoing function for the palliative care team to support the nurses and the families would increase the scope for home deaths. Working conditions differed between rural and urban districts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helle Timm
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn
- Faculty of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
| | - Ása Róin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Faroe Islands, Torshavn
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allard E, Dumaine S, Sasseville M, Gabet M, Duhoux A. Quality of palliative and end-of-life care: a qualitative study of experts' recommendations to improve indicators in Quebec (Canada). BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:146. [PMID: 38858720 PMCID: PMC11163802 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01474-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2021, the National Institute of Public Health (INSPQ) (Quebec, Canada), published an update of the palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) indicators. Using these updated indicators, this qualitative study aimed to explore the point of view of PEoLC experts on how to improve access and quality of care as well as policies surrounding end-of-life care. METHODS Semi-directed interviews were conducted with palliative care and policy experts, who were asked to share their interpretations on the updated indicators and their recommendations to improve PEoLC. A thematic analysis method was used. RESULTS The results highlight two categories of interpretations and recommendations pertaining to: (1) data and indicators and (2) clinical and organizational practice. Participants highlight the lack of reliability and quality of the data and indicators used by political and clinical stakeholders in evaluating PEoLC. To improve data and indicators, they recommend: improving the rigour and quality of collected data, assessing death percentages in all healthcare settings, promoting research on quality of care, comparing data to EOL care directives, assessing use of services in EOL, and creating an observatory on PEoLC. Participants also identified barriers and disparities in accessing PEoLC as well as inconsistency in quality of care. To improve PEoLC, they recommend: early identification of palliative care patients, improving training for all healthcare professionals, optimizing professional practice, integrating interdisciplinary teams, and developing awareness on access disparities. CONCLUSIONS Results show that PEoLC is an important aspect of public health. Recommendations issued are relevant to improve PEoLC in and outside Quebec.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Allard
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, PO Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
| | - Sarah Dumaine
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, PO Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Martin Sasseville
- Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne (CRCLM), Campus de Longueuil - Université de Sherbrooke, 150 Place Charles LeMoyne - Bureau 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Morgane Gabet
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, 7101 Av du Parc, Montréal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada
| | - Arnaud Duhoux
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, PO Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shalev D, Brenner K, Carlson RL, Chammas D, Levitt S, Noufi PE, Robbins-Welty G, Webb JA. Palliative Care Psychiatry: Building Synergy Across the Spectrum. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2024; 26:60-72. [PMID: 38329570 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-024-01485-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Palliative care (PC) psychiatry is a growing subspecialty focusing on improving the mental health of those with serious medical conditions and their caregivers. This review elucidates the current practice and ongoing evolution of PC psychiatry. RECENT FINDINGS PC psychiatry leverages training and clinical practices from both PC and psychiatry, addressing a wide range of needs, including enhanced psychiatric care for patients with serious medical illness, PC access for patients with medical needs in psychiatric settings, and PC-informed psychiatric approaches for individuals with treatment-refractory serious mental illness. PC psychiatry is practiced by a diverse workforce comprising hospice and palliative medicine-trained psychiatrists, psycho-oncologists, geriatric psychiatrists, other mental health professionals, and non-psychiatrist PC clinicians. As a result, PC psychiatry faces challenges in defining its operational scope. The manuscript outlines the growth, current state, and prospects of PC psychiatry. It examines its roles across various healthcare settings, including medical, integrated care, and psychiatric environments, highlighting the unique challenges and opportunities in each. PC psychiatry is a vibrant and growing subspecialty of psychiatry that must be operationalized to continue its developmental trajectory. There is a need for a distinct professional identity for PC psychiatry, strategies to navigate administrative and regulatory hurdles, and greater support for novel clinical, educational, and research initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Shalev
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68thStreet, Box 39, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Keri Brenner
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Rose L Carlson
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68thStreet, Box 39, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Danielle Chammas
- Department of Medicine, University of California: San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Levitt
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul E Noufi
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jason A Webb
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pereira J, Klinger C, Seow H, Marshall D, Herx L. Are We Consulting, Sharing Care, or Taking Over? A Conceptual Framework. Palliat Med Rep 2024; 5:104-115. [PMID: 38415077 PMCID: PMC10898231 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Primary- and specialist-level palliative care services are needed. They should work collaboratively and synergistically. Although several service models have been described, these remain open to different interpretations and deployment. Aim This article describes a conceptual framework, the Consultation-Shared Care-Takeover (C-S-T) Framework, its evolution and its applications. Design An iterative process informed the development of the Framework. This included a symposium, literature searches, results from three studies, and real-life applications. Results The C-S-T Framework represents a spectrum anchored by the Consultation model at one end, the Takeover model at the other end, and the Shared Care model in the center. Indicators, divided into five domains, help differentiate one model from the other. The domains are (1) Scope (What aspects of care are addressed by the palliative care clinician?); (2) Prescriber (Who prescribes the treatments?); (3) Communication (What communication occurs between the palliative care clinician and the patient's attending clinician?); (4) Follow-up (Who provides the follow-up visits and what is their frequency?); and (5) Most responsible practitioner (MRP) (Who is identified as MRP?). Each model demonstrates strengths, limitations, uses, and roles. Conclusions The C-S-T Framework can be used to better describe, understand, assess, and monitor models being used by specialist palliative care teams in their interactions with primary care providers and other specialist services. Large studies are needed to test the application of the Framework on a broader scale in health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Pereira
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
- Pallium Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Klinger
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Pallium Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denise Marshall
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leonie Herx
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang YJ, Hsu CY, Yen AMF, Chen HH, Lai CC. Advancing screening tool for hospice needs and end-of-life decision-making process in the emergency department. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:51. [PMID: 38389106 PMCID: PMC10885365 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01391-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting mortality in the emergency department (ED) is imperative to guide palliative care and end-of-life decisions. However, the clinical usefulness of utilizing the existing screening tools still leaves something to be desired. METHODS We advanced the screening tool with the A-qCPR (Age, qSOFA (quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment), cancer, Performance Status Scale, and DNR (Do-Not-Resuscitate) risk score model for predicting one-year mortality in the emergency department of Taipei City Hospital of Taiwan with the potential of hospice need and evaluated its performance compared with the existing screening model. We adopted a large retrospective cohort in conjunction with in-time (the trained and the holdout validation cohort) for the development of the A-qCPR model and out-of-time validation sample for external validation and model robustness to variation with the calendar year. RESULTS A total of 10,474 patients were enrolled in the training cohort and 33,182 patients for external validation. Significant risk scores included age (0.05 per year), qSOFA ≥ 2 (4), Cancer (5), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score ≥ 2 (2), and DNR status (2). One-year mortality rates were 13.6% for low (score ≦ 3 points), 29.9% for medium (3 < Score ≦ 9 points), and 47.1% for high categories (Score > 9 points). The AUROC curve for the in-time validation sample was 0.76 (0.74-0.78). However, the corresponding figure was slightly shrunk to 0.69 (0.69-0.70) based on out-of-time validation. The accuracy with our newly developed A-qCPR model was better than those existing tools including 0.57 (0.56-0.57) by using SQ (surprise question), 0.54 (0.54-0.54) by using qSOFA, and 0.59 (0.59-0.59) by using ECOG performance status score. Applying the A-qCPR model to emergency departments since 2017 has led to a year-on-year increase in the proportion of patients or their families signing DNR documents, which had not been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS The A-qCPR model is not only effective in predicting one-year mortality but also in identifying hospice needs. Advancing the screening tool that has been widely used for hospice in various scenarios is particularly helpful for facilitating the end-of-life decision-making process in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Jing Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan. No. 10, Sec. 4, Ren-Ai Road, Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Master of Public Health Program, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Yang Hsu
- Master of Public Health Program, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Medical Department, Daichung Hospital, Miaoli, Taiwan
- Taiwan Association of Medical Screening, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Amy Ming-Fang Yen
- School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Hsi Chen
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Chih Lai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan. No. 10, Sec. 4, Ren-Ai Road, Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Master of Public Health Program, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Scruton S, Warner G, Kendell C, Pfaff K, Stajduhar K, Patrick L, Dujela C, Fauteux F, Urquhart R. Navigation programs to support community-dwelling individuals with life-limiting illness: determinants of implementation. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:39. [PMID: 38184522 PMCID: PMC10770879 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10541-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the Canadian population ages and the prevalence of chronic illnesses increases, delivering high-quality care to individuals with advanced life limiting illnesses becomes more challenging. Community-based navigation programs are a promising approach to address these challenges, but little is known about how these programs are successfully implemented to meet the needs of this population. This study sought to identify the key determinants that contribute to the successful implementation of these programs within Canada. METHODS A qualitative study was undertaken to understand the implementation of eleven innovative, community-based navigation programs that aim to address the needs of individuals with life-limiting illnesses as they approach the end of life. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the study design. Key informants (n = 23) within these programs took part in semi-structured interviews where they were asked to discuss how these programs are implemented. Data were analyzed using techniques employed in qualitative description. RESULTS We identified key determinants of successful implementation within each CFIR domain. In the outer setting domain, participants emphasized the importance of filling gaps in care to meet client needs, developing strong relationships with clients and community-based organizations, and navigating relationships with healthcare providers. At the inner setting level, leadership support, staff compatibility, and available resources were identified as important factors. In terms of intervention characteristics, the ability to adapt was cited as a facilitator, whereas costs were identified as a barrier. For the characteristics of individuals, participants described the importance of having staff whose values align with the program, and who have the experience and skills necessary to work with complex clients. Finally, having strong champions and evaluation processes were highlighted as important process-oriented determinants of successful implementation. CONCLUSION This study provides valuable insights into the determinants of successful implementation of community-based navigation programs in Canada. Understanding these determinants can guide the future development and integration of navigation programs to successfully meet the needs of those with life-limiting illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Scruton
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Centre for Clinical Research, Dalhousie University, Room 413, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada
| | - Grace Warner
- School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Cynthia Kendell
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Kathryn Pfaff
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - Kelli Stajduhar
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Linda Patrick
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - Carren Dujela
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Faith Fauteux
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Centre for Clinical Research, Dalhousie University, Room 413, 5790 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fratt E, Haupt EC, Wang SE, Nguyen H. Effects of early exposure to palliative care on end-of-life outcomes in patients with cancer in a community setting. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004547. [PMID: 38123959 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although prior studies show that exposure to early outpatient palliative care (OPC) versus no exposure is associated with improved outcomes at the end of life (EoL) for patients with cancer, few examined the impact of exposure to OPC prior to home-based palliative care (HBPC) on EoL outcomes. This study compares the effect of OPC prior to HBPC versus HBPC alone on EoL outcomes in patients with cancer. METHODS A secondary analysis of data from a trial comparing two models of HBPC was performed on patients with primary cancer diagnoses. Adjusted negative binomial and logistic regression models were used to compare days in acute care and intensive care unit stays in the last 30 days, chemotherapy administration in the last 14 days and in-hospital deaths between patients who received standard-dose (4+ encounters) and low-dose (<4 encounters) OPC plus HBPC versus HBPC alone. RESULTS A total of 1187 patients, 483 (40.1%) of whom had OPC+HBPC and 704 (59.3%) who had HBPC alone were included in the analyses. Compared with patients who had HBPC alone, patients who had standard-dose OPC spent fewer days in acute care (4.29 vs 4.19, p=0.04) and fewer days inpatient (3.45 vs 3.09, p=0.03) in the last 30 days of life. No difference was seen in EoL outcomes in patients exposed to low-dose OPC compared with those with HBPC alone. Receipt of hospice after HBPC was strongly associated with improved EoL outcomes. CONCLUSION Future research is needed to examine the modality, timing and intensity of palliative care necessary to effect EoL outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellie Fratt
- Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Eric C Haupt
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, California, USA
| | - Susan E Wang
- The Permanente Federation LLC, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Huong Nguyen
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Scott MM, Ramzy A, Isenberg SR, Webber C, Eddeen AB, Murmann M, Mahdavi R, Howard M, Kendall CE, Klinger C, Marshall D, Sinnarajah A, Ponka D, Buchman S, Bennett C, Tanuseputro P, Dahrouge S, May K, Heer C, Cooper D, Manuel D, Thavorn K, Hsu AT. Nurse practitioner and physician end-of-life home visits and end-of-life outcomes. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004392. [PMID: 37979954 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Physicians and nurse practitioners (NPs) play critical roles in supporting palliative and end-of-life care in the community. We examined healthcare outcomes among patients who received home visits from physicians and NPs in the 90 days before death. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked data of adult home care users in Ontario, Canada, who died between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. Healthcare outcomes included medications for pain and symptom management, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalisations and a community-based death. We compared the characteristics of and outcomes in decedents who received a home visit from an NP, physician and both to those who did not receive a home visit. RESULTS Half (56.9%) of adult decedents in Ontario did not receive a home visit from a provider in the last 90 days of life; 34.5% received at least one visit from a physician, 3.8% from an NP and 4.9% from both. Compared with those without any visits, having at least one home visit reduced the odds of hospitalisation and ED visits, and increased the odds of receiving medications for pain and symptom management and achieving a community-based death. Observed effects were larger in patients who received at least one visit from both. CONCLUSIONS Beyond home care, receiving home visits from primary care providers near the end of life may be associated with better outcomes that are aligned with patients' preferences-emphasising the importance of NPs and physicians' role in supporting people near the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Scott
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy Ramzy
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarina Roslyn Isenberg
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colleen Webber
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anan Bader Eddeen
- ICES uOttawa, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maya Murmann
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roshanak Mahdavi
- ICES uOttawa, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire E Kendall
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Klinger
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denise Marshall
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aynharan Sinnarajah
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Ponka
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandy Buchman
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carol Bennett
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- ICES uOttawa, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simone Dahrouge
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathryn May
- Emergency Department, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carrie Heer
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dana Cooper
- Nurse Practitioners' Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas Manuel
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- ICES uOttawa, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- ICES uOttawa, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy T Hsu
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Urquhart R, Kendell C, Pfaff K, Stajduhar K, Patrick L, Dujela C, Scruton S, Fauteux F, Warner G. How do navigation programs address the needs of those living in the community with advanced, life-limiting Illness? A realist evaluation of programs in Canada. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:179. [PMID: 37964238 PMCID: PMC10647106 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01304-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to identify innovative navigation programs across Canadian jurisdictions that target their services to individuals affected by life-limiting illness and their families, and articulate the principal components of these programs that enable them to address the needs of their clients who are living in the community. METHODS This realist evaluation used a two-phased approach. First, we conducted a horizon scan of innovative community-based navigation programs across Canadian jurisdictions to identify innovative community-based navigation programs that aim to address the needs of community-dwelling individuals affected by life-limiting illness. Second, we conducted semi-structured interviews with key informants from each of the selected programs. Informants included individuals responsible for managing and delivering the program and decision-makers with responsibility and/or oversight of the program. Analyses proceeded in an iterative manner, consistent with realist evaluation methods. This included iteratively developing and refining Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations, and developing the final program theory. RESULTS Twenty-seven navigation programs were identified from the horizon scan. Using specific eligibility criteria, 11 programs were selected for subsequent interviews and in-depth examination. Twenty-three participants were interviewed from these programs, which operated in five Canadian provinces. The programs represented a mixture of community (non-profit or volunteer), research-initiated, and health system programs. The final program theory was articulated as: navigation programs can improve client outcomes if they have supported and empowered staff who have the time and flexibility to personalize care to the needs of their clients. CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight key principles (contexts and mechanisms) that enable navigation programs to develop client relationships, personalize care to client needs, and improve client outcomes. These principles include staff (or volunteer) knowledge and experience to coordinate health and social services, having a point of contact after hours, and providing staff (and volunteers) time and flexibility to develop relationships and respond to individualized client needs. These findings may be used by healthcare organizations - outside of navigation programs - to work towards more person-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Room 413, Halifax, NS, Canada.
| | - Cynthia Kendell
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Kathryn Pfaff
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - Kelli Stajduhar
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Linda Patrick
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - Carren Dujela
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Sarah Scruton
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Room 413, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Faith Fauteux
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - Grace Warner
- School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hooker ER, Chapa J, Vranas KC, Niederhausen M, Goodlin SJ, Slatore CG, Sullivan DR. Intersection of Palliative Care and Hospice Use Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:1474-1481. [PMID: 37262128 PMCID: PMC10658737 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Hospice and palliative care (PC) are important components of lung cancer care and independently provide benefits to patients and their families. Objective: To better understand the relationship between hospice and PC and factors that influence this relationship. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer (stage IIIB/IV) within the U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VA) from 2007 to 2013 with follow-up through 2017 (n = 22,907). Mixed logistic regression models with a random effect for site, adjustment for patient variables, and propensity score weighting were used to examine whether the association between PC and hospice use varied by U.S. region and PC team characteristics. Results: Overall, 57% of patients with lung cancer received PC, 69% received hospice, and 16% received neither. Of those who received hospice, 60% were already enrolled in PC. Patients who received PC had higher odds of hospice enrollment than patients who did not receive PC (adjusted odds ratio = 3.25, 95% confidence interval: 2.43-4.36). There were regional differences among patients who received PC; the predicted probability of hospice enrollment was 85% and 73% in the Southeast and Northeast, respectively. PC team and facility characteristics influenced hospice use in addition to PC; teams with the shortest duration of existence, with formal team training, and at lower hospital complexity were more likely to use hospice (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Among patients with advanced lung cancer, PC was associated with hospice enrollment. However, this relationship varied by geographic region, and PC team and facility characteristics. Our findings suggest that regional PC resource availability may contribute to substitution effects between PC and hospice for end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R. Hooker
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in their Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Joaquin Chapa
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kelly C. Vranas
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in their Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Divisions of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Meike Niederhausen
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in their Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Oregon Health and Science University—Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Sarah J. Goodlin
- Geriatrics Section, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christopher G. Slatore
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in their Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Donald R. Sullivan
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in their Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gitau K, Huang A, Isenberg SR, Stall N, Ailon J, Bell CM, Quinn KL. Association of patient sex with use of palliative care in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E1025-E1032. [PMID: 37935486 PMCID: PMC10635704 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether there are sex-based differences in use of palliative care near the end of life. The objective of this study was to measure the association between sex and palliative care use. METHODS We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of all patients aged 18 years or older in the last year of life who died in Ontario, Canada, between 2010 and 2018. The primary exposure was patient biologic sex (male or female). The primary outcome was receipt of physician-delivered palliative care; secondary outcomes were approach to in-hospital palliative care and sex concordance of the patient and referring physician. We used multivariable modified Poisson regression to measure the association between patient sex and palliative care receipt, as well as patient-physician sex concordance. RESULTS There were 706 722 patients (354 657 females [50.2%], median age 80 yr [interquartile range 69-87 yr]) in the study cohort, 377 498 (53.4%) of whom received physician-delivered palliative care. After adjustment for age and selected comorbidities, female sex was associated with a 9% relative increase (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.10) in receipt of physician-delivered palliative care. Female patients were 16% more likely than male patients (adjusted RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.14-1.18) to have had their first hospital admission in their final year of life categorized as having a likely palliative intent. Female patients were 18% more likely than male patients (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.17-1.19) to have had a female referring physician, and male patients were 20% more likely than female patients (adjusted RR 1.20, CI 1.19-1.21) to have had a male referring physician. INTERPRETATION After adjustment for age and comorbidities, male patients were slightly less likely than female patients to have received physician-delivered palliative care, and female patients were more likely than male patients to have had their first hospital admission in their final year of life categorized as having a likely palliative care intent. These results may reflect a between-sex difference in overall end-of-life care preferences or sex differences in decision-making influenced by patient-specific factors; further studies exploring how these factors affect end-of-life decision-making are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Gitau
- Departments of Medicine (Gitau, Stall, Ailon, Bell, Quinn) and Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto; ICES (Huang, Stall, Bell, Quinn); Department of Medicine (Stall, Bell, Quinn), Sinai Health System; Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care (Quinn), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Isenberg), University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute (Isenberg, Ailon), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Anjie Huang
- Departments of Medicine (Gitau, Stall, Ailon, Bell, Quinn) and Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto; ICES (Huang, Stall, Bell, Quinn); Department of Medicine (Stall, Bell, Quinn), Sinai Health System; Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care (Quinn), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Isenberg), University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute (Isenberg, Ailon), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Sarina R Isenberg
- Departments of Medicine (Gitau, Stall, Ailon, Bell, Quinn) and Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto; ICES (Huang, Stall, Bell, Quinn); Department of Medicine (Stall, Bell, Quinn), Sinai Health System; Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care (Quinn), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Isenberg), University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute (Isenberg, Ailon), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Nathan Stall
- Departments of Medicine (Gitau, Stall, Ailon, Bell, Quinn) and Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto; ICES (Huang, Stall, Bell, Quinn); Department of Medicine (Stall, Bell, Quinn), Sinai Health System; Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care (Quinn), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Isenberg), University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute (Isenberg, Ailon), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Jonathan Ailon
- Departments of Medicine (Gitau, Stall, Ailon, Bell, Quinn) and Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto; ICES (Huang, Stall, Bell, Quinn); Department of Medicine (Stall, Bell, Quinn), Sinai Health System; Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care (Quinn), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Isenberg), University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute (Isenberg, Ailon), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Chaim M Bell
- Departments of Medicine (Gitau, Stall, Ailon, Bell, Quinn) and Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto; ICES (Huang, Stall, Bell, Quinn); Department of Medicine (Stall, Bell, Quinn), Sinai Health System; Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care (Quinn), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Isenberg), University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute (Isenberg, Ailon), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Kieran L Quinn
- Departments of Medicine (Gitau, Stall, Ailon, Bell, Quinn) and Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto; ICES (Huang, Stall, Bell, Quinn); Department of Medicine (Stall, Bell, Quinn), Sinai Health System; Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care (Quinn), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Medicine (Isenberg), University of Ottawa; Bruyère Research Institute (Isenberg, Ailon), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Johannesen EJD, Timm H, Róin Á. Caregivers' experiences of end-of-life caregiving to severely ill relatives with cancer dying at home: A qualitative study in the Faroe Islands. Scand J Caring Sci 2023; 37:788-796. [PMID: 36942725 DOI: 10.1111/scs.13165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM It is common among people with advanced cancer to wish to die at home, but only a few succeed in doing so. The willingness of family members to care for a person, who wants to die at home, is crucial This qualitative study aimed to provide insight into conditions that make dying at home possible in a small-scale society and to describe family caregivers' experiences of providing end-of-life care in a private home setting. METHODS Thirteen caregivers were interviewed, their ages varying from 39 to 84 years. A phenomenological approach, inspired by Giorgi, was applied. RESULTS Two essential structures captured the experience of caring at home until death: 'Managing end-of-life care' and 'meaningfulness in a time of impending death'. It was mainly the family, and especially family members with a healthcare background, together with the district nurses, who supported the caregivers in managing the care of a dying relative at home. Being able to fulfil their relative's wish to die at home and to come closer together as a family made the caregivers feel their efforts meaningful. CONCLUSION Our findings point to the importance of having access to home care day and night for the caregivers to feel secure during the night-time. As of now, this is only an option in larger towns in the Faroe Islands, which might also be the case in outskirts areas in other countries. Our findings also showed an unmet need for support to ease the mental load on caregivers. Establishing an outgoing interdisciplinary palliative team would help to increase the number of people who want to die at home and succeed in doing so by giving the caregivers emotional and advisory support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsa J D Johannesen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Faroe Islands, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
| | - Helle Timm
- Faculty of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ása Róin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Faroe Islands, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Scott MM, Webber C, Clarke AE, Hafid A, Isenberg SR, Jones A, Hsu AT, Conen K, Downar J, Manuel DG, Howard M, Tanuseputro P. Physician home visits to rostered patients during their last year of life: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E597-E606. [PMID: 37402554 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physician home visits are associated with better health outcomes, yet most patients near the end of life never receive such a visit. Our objectives were to describe the receipt of physician home visits during the last year of life after a referral to home care - an indication that the patient can no longer live independently - and to measure associations between patient characteristics and receipt of a home visit. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked population-based health administrative databases housed at ICES. We identified adult (aged ≥ 18 yr) decedents in Ontario who died between Mar. 31, 2013, and Mar. 31, 2018, who were receiving primary care and were referred to publicly funded home care services. We described the provision of physician home visits, office visits and telephone management. We used multinomial logistic regression to calculate the odds of receiving home visits from a rostered primary care physician, controlling for referral during the last year of life, age, sex, income quintile, rurality, recent immigrant status, referral by rostered physician, referral during hospital stay, number of chronic conditions and disease trajectory based on the cause of death. RESULTS Of the 58 753 decedents referred in their last year of life, 3125 (5.3%) received a home visit from their family physician. Patient characteristics associated with higher odds of receiving home visits compared to office-based or telephone-based care were being female (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.35), being 85 years of age or older (adjusted OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.80-3.26) and living in a rural area (adjusted OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.18). Increased odds were associated with home care referrals by the patient's primary care physician (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.39-1.58) and referrals occurring during a hospital stay (adjusted OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.13-1.28). INTERPRETATION A small proportion of patients near the end of life received home-based physician care, and patient characteristics did not explain the low visit rates. Future work on system- and provider-level factors may be critical to improve access to home-based end-of-life primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Scott
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
| | - Colleen Webber
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Anna E Clarke
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Abe Hafid
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Sarina R Isenberg
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Aaron Jones
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Amy T Hsu
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Katrin Conen
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - James Downar
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Douglas G Manuel
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Michelle Howard
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Scott, Webber, Clarke, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); School of Epidemiology and Public Health (Scott, Isenberg, Tanuseputro), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Webber, Clarke, Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Hafid, Howard), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Isenberg), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Jones); Department of Medicine (Conen), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Palliative Care (Downar), Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Department of Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McFerran E, Cairnduff V, Elder R, Gavin A, Lawler M. Cost consequences of unscheduled emergency admissions in cancer patients in the last year of life. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:201. [PMID: 36869930 PMCID: PMC9985568 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07633-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cancer is a leading cause of death. This paper examines the utilisation of unscheduled emergency end-of-life healthcare and estimates expenditure in this domain. We explore care patterns and quantify the likely benefits from service reconfigurations which may influence rates of hospital admission and deaths. METHODS Using prevalence-based retrospective data from the Northern Ireland General Registrar's Office linked by cancer diagnosis to Patient Administration episode data for unscheduled emergency care (1st January 2014 to 31st December 2015), we estimate unscheduled-emergency-care costs in the last year of life. We model potential resources released by reductions in length-of-stay for cancer patients. Linear regression examined patient characteristics affecting length of stay. RESULTS A total of 3134 cancer patients used 60,746 days of unscheduled emergency care (average 19.5 days). Of these, 48.9% had ≥1 admission during their last 28 days of life. Total estimated cost was £28,684,261, averaging £9200 per person. Lung cancer patients had the highest proportion of admissions (23.2%, mean length of stay = 17.9 days, mean cost=£7224). The highest service use and total cost was in those diagnosed at stage IV (38.4%), who required 22,099 days of care, costing £9,629,014. Palliative care support, identified in 25.5% of patients, contributed £1,322,328. A 3-day reduction in the mean length of stay with a 10% reduction in admissions, could reduce costs by £7.37 million. Regression analyses explained 41% of length-of-stay variability. CONCLUSIONS The cost burden from unscheduled care use in the last year of life of cancer patients is significant. Opportunities to prioritise service reconfiguration for high-costing users emphasized lung and colorectal cancers as offering the greatest potential to influence outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethna McFerran
- C/o Patrick G Johnson Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK.
| | | | - Ray Elder
- South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Ulster Hospital, Upper Newtownards Road, Dundonald, BT16 1RH, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Mulhouse Building, Queen's University, Mulhouse Rd, Belfast, BT12 6DP, UK
| | - Mark Lawler
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chukwusa E, Font-Gilabert P, Manthorpe J, Healey A. The association between social care expenditure and multiple-long term conditions: A population-based area-level analysis. JOURNAL OF MULTIMORBIDITY AND COMORBIDITY 2023; 13:26335565231208994. [PMID: 37900010 PMCID: PMC10612455 DOI: 10.1177/26335565231208994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Background Multiple long-term health conditions (MLTCs) are common and increasing among older people, yet there is limited understanding of their prevalence and association with social care expenditure. Aim To estimate the prevalence of MTLCs and association with English social care expenditure. Methods Our study population included those aged ≥ 65 who died in England in the year 2018 with any of the following long-term conditions recorded on their death certificate: diabetes; cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) including hypertension; dementia; stroke; respiratory; and chronic kidney diseases (CKDs). Prevalence was based on the proportion of death reported for older people with MTLCs (≥ 2) in each of the 152 English Local Authorities (LAs). Ordinary least square regression (OLS) was used to assess the relationship between prevalence of MTLCs and adult social care expenditure, adjusting for LA characteristics. Results Of the 409551 deaths reported, 19.9% (n = 81395) had ≥ 2 MTLCs, of which the combination of CVDs-diabetes was the most prevalent. Hospitals were the leading place of death for those with MTLCs. Results from the OLS regression model showed that an increased prevalence of MLTCs is associated with higher LA social care expenditure. A percentage point increase in prevalence of MLTCs is associated with an increase of about £8.13 in per capita LA social care expenditure. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the increased prevalence of MTLCs is associated with increased LA social care expenditure. It is important for future studies to further explore the mechanisms or link between LA social care expenditure and the prevalence of MTLCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emeka Chukwusa
- Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Paulino Font-Gilabert
- Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, The David Goldberg Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Healey
- Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, The David Goldberg Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chiaruttini MV, Corli O, Pizzuto M, Nobili A, Fortini G, Fortino I, Leoni O, Bosetti C. Palliative medicine favourably influences end-of-life cancer care intensity: a large retrospective database study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022:spcare-2022-004050. [PMID: 36522144 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hospice and home palliative care have been associated to a reduction of aggressive treatments in the end-of-life, but data in the Italian context are scanty. Therefore, we aim to investigate the role of palliative care on indicators of end-of-life intensity of care among patients with cancer in Lombardy, the largest Italian region. METHODS Within a retrospective study using the healthcare utilisation databases of Lombardy, Italy, we selected all residents who died in 2019 with a diagnosis of cancer. We considered as exposure variables admission to palliative care and time at palliative care admission, and as indicators of aggressive care hospitalisations, diagnostic/therapeutic procedures, in-hospital death, emergency department visits and chemotherapy over a time window of 30 days before death; chemotherapy in the last 14 days was also considered. RESULTS Our cohort included 26 539 individuals; of these, 14 320 (54%) were admitted to palliative care before death. Individuals who were admitted to palliative care had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.27 for one hospitalisation, 0.14 for ≥2 hospitalisations, 0.25 for hospital stay ≥12 days, 0.38 for minor diagnostic/therapeutic procedures, 0.18 for major diagnostic/therapeutic procedures, 0.02 for in-hospital death, 0.35 for one emergency department visit, 0.29 for ≥2 emergency department visits and 0.66 for chemotherapy use in the last 30 days; the OR was 0.56 for chemotherapy use in the last 14 days. CONCLUSIONS This large real-world analysis confirms and further support the importance of palliative care assistance for patients with cancer in the end- of- life; this is associated to a significant reduction in unnecessary treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oscar Corli
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Nobili
- Dipartimento di Politiche per la Salute, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ida Fortino
- Regione Lombardia Direzione Generale Welfare, Milano, Italy
| | - Olivia Leoni
- Regione Lombardia Direzione Generale Welfare, Milano, Italy
| | - Cristina Bosetti
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brites MA, Gonçalves J, Rego F. Admission to the Emergency Department by Patients Being Followed up for Palliative Care Consultations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:15204. [PMID: 36429920 PMCID: PMC9690894 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192215204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life of patients and families facing life-threatening diseases. Admissions to the emergency department are considered potentially avoidable. This study aims to characterize the use of the emergency department by palliative care patients at a public hospital in Portugal. METHODS This retrospective study included patients who had their first palliative care appointment during the year 2019; 135 patients were included, with 255 admissions to the emergency department. Descriptive statistical analysis consisted of calculating the absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies for categorical variables and medians (Mdn) and percentiles (P25 and P75) for continuous variables. The multivariable associations were calculated via logistic models, with the statistical significance set to p < 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Dying in hospital was associated with going to the emergency department. Patients who died in hospital had more admissions and spent more time there. CONCLUSION Emergency department admissions suggest that there are gaps in the provision of care. It is necessary to anticipate crisis situations, provide home and telephone appointments, and invest in professionals' education to respond to the needs that will grow in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Azevedo Brites
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Family Health Unit Corino de Andrade, Póvoa de Varzim, 4490-602 Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal
| | - Joana Gonçalves
- Póvoa de Varzim—Vila do Conde Hospital Center, 4490-421 Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal
| | - Francisca Rego
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Watanabe T, Matsushima M, Kaneko M, Aoki T, Sugiyama Y, Fujinuma Y. Death at home versus other locations in older people receiving physician‐led home visits: A multicenter prospective study in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22:1005-1012. [PMID: 36374192 PMCID: PMC10100087 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Japanese government is promoting physician-led home visits as well as end-of-life care at home. However, the proportion of deaths occurring at home has remained unchanged for the past 20 years. OBJECTIVES To report the cumulative incidence of deaths at home and to explore the factors associated with deaths at home versus other places, mainly hospitals. METHODS This was a multicenter prospective cohort study in a primary care setting. We enrolled patients aged ≥65 years who had started to receive regular visits by family physicians from 13 facilities in and around Tokyo between February 1, 2013 and January 31, 2016. Patients were followed-up until January 31, 2017. The primary outcome measures were mortality rate and cumulative incidence of deaths at home. RESULTS We enrolled 762 patients. Of 368 deaths, 133 occurred in the patient's home. The mortality rates at home were 137.6/1000 person-years (95% confidence interval 116.1-163.1). In cumulative incidence function, the longer duration of care at home lowers the likelihood of death at home. Multivariable multinomial logistic models showed that younger age and higher Barthel Index score reduced the likelihood of deaths at home, while receiving oxygen therapy and the presence of a full-time caregiver increased the likelihood of deaths at home relative to deaths at other locations. CONCLUSIONS Of deceased patients, only one-third died in patients' homes. We found several factors associated with deaths at home, which appeared to reflect the readiness of patients and their families for death. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 1005-1012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takamasa Watanabe
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
- Centre for Family Medicine Development Japanese Health and Welfare Co‐operative Federation Tokyo Japan
| | - Masato Matsushima
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
- Department of Health Data Science Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan
- Division of Community Health and Primary Care Center for Medical Education, The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Makoto Kaneko
- Department of Health Data Science Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan
| | - Takuya Aoki
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Sugiyama
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
- Division of Community Health and Primary Care Center for Medical Education, The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Yasuki Fujinuma
- Centre for Family Medicine Development Japanese Health and Welfare Co‐operative Federation Tokyo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Arya A, Davey R, Sharma A, Dosani N, Grewal D, Afzal A, Bhargava R, Chasen M, Med P. Utilization of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in a Specialist Palliative Care Team Across Multiple Care Settings: A Retrospective Chart Review. Palliat Med Rep 2022; 3:229-234. [PMID: 36341470 PMCID: PMC9629911 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technological advancements have rapidly increased the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) across various medical disciplines, leading to real-time information for clinicians at the bed side. However, literature reveals scant evidence of POCUS use in palliative care. The objective of this study was to examine the use of POCUS in a specialist palliative care setting. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2018 to June 2019 in Brampton, Canada, to evaluate characteristics of patients for whom POCUS was utilized. Patients were identified through pre-existing logs and descriptive information was collected from electronic health records, including demographic information, life-limiting diagnosis, patient assessment location, diagnosis made with POCUS, and, if applicable, volume of fluid drained. RESULTS We identified 126 uses of POCUS in 89 unique patients. Sixty-two patients (69.7%) had a cancer diagnosis, with patients most commonly suffering from gastrointestinal, lung, and breast pathologies. Sixty-one POCUS cases (48.4%) were in the outpatient setting. Eighty-one POCUS cases (64.3%) revealed a diagnosis of ascites and 21 POCUS cases (16.7%) revealed a diagnosis of pleural effusion. Other diagnoses made with POCUS included bowel obstruction, pneumonia, and congestive heart failure. During the study period, 52 paracentesis and 7 thoracentesis procedures were performed using POCUS guidance. CONCLUSION We identified multiple indications in our specialist palliative care setting where POCUS aided in diagnosis/management of patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Further studies can be conducted to identify the potential benefits in symptom burden, patient and caregiver satisfaction, and health care utilization in palliative care patients receiving POCUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Arya
- Freeman Centre for the Advancement of Palliative Care, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- *Address correspondence to: Amit Arya, MD, CCFP (PC), FCFP, Freeman Centre for the Advancement of Palliative Care, Room 3S-376, 4001 Leslie Street, Toronto M2K 1E1, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Roddy Davey
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, Brampton Civic Hospital, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Achal Sharma
- Corporate Department of Research, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Naheed Dosani
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dilnoor Grewal
- Corporate Department of Research, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aysha Afzal
- Corporate Department of Research, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ravi Bhargava
- Corporate Department of Research, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Pall Med
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, Brampton Civic Hospital, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Campos E, Isenberg SR, Lovblom LE, Mak S, Steinberg L, Bush SH, Goldman R, Graham C, Kavalieratos D, Stukel T, Tanuseputro P, Quinn KL. Supporting the Heterogeneous and Evolving Treatment Preferences of Patients With Heart Failure Through Collaborative Home-Based Palliative Care. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11:e026319. [PMID: 36172958 PMCID: PMC9673704 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.026319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background We characterized the treatment preferences, care setting, and end-of-life outcomes among patients with advanced heart failure supported by a collaborative home-based model of palliative care. Methods and results This decedent cohort study included 250 patients with advanced heart failure who received collaborative home-based palliative care for a median duration of 1.9 months of follow-up in Ontario, Canada, from April 2013 to July 2019. Patients were categorized into 1 of 4 groups according to their initial treatment preferences. Outcomes included location of death (out of hospital versus in hospital), changes in treatment preferences, and health service use. Among patients who initially prioritized quantity of life, 21 of 43 (48.8%) changed their treatment preferences during follow-up (mean 0.28 changes per month). The majority of these patients changed their preferences to avoid hospitalization and focus on comfort at home (19 of 24 changes, 79%). A total of 207 of 250 (82.8%) patients experienced an out-of-hospital death. Patients who initially prioritized quantity of life had decreased odds of out-of-hospital death (versus in-hospital death; adjusted odds ratio, 0.259 [95% CI, 0.097-0.693]) and more frequent hospitalizations (mean 0.45 hospitalizations per person-month) compared with patients who initially prioritized quality of life at home. Conclusions Our results yield a more detailed understanding of the interaction of advanced care planning and patient preferences. Shared decision making for personalized treatment is dynamic and can be enacted earlier than at the very end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Campos
- Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntario
| | - Sarina R. Isenberg
- Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntario
- Department of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntario
- Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntario
| | | | - Susanna Mak
- Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntario
- Department of MedicineSinai Health SystemTorontoOntario
- Division of CardiologySinai Health SystemTorontoOntario
| | - Leah Steinberg
- Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntario
- Department of MedicineSinai Health SystemTorontoOntario
- Interdepartmental Division of Palliative CareSinai Health SystemTorontoOntario
| | - Shirley H. Bush
- Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntario
- Department of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntario
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntario
| | - Russell Goldman
- Interdepartmental Division of Palliative CareSinai Health SystemTorontoOntario
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative CareTorontoOntario
| | | | - Dio Kavalieratos
- Division of Palliative MedicineEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaGeorgia
| | | | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Bruyère Research InstituteOttawaOntario
- Department of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntario
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaOttawaOntario
- ICESTorontoOntario
- ICESOttawaOntario
| | - Kieran L. Quinn
- Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntario
- Department of MedicineSinai Health SystemTorontoOntario
- Interdepartmental Division of Palliative CareSinai Health SystemTorontoOntario
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative CareTorontoOntario
- ICESTorontoOntario
- ICESOttawaOntario
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leung B, Wong SK, Ho C. End-of-Life Health Resource Utilization for Limited English-Proficient Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1716-e1724. [DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE: Limited English-proficient (LEP) patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may receive less palliative care services and more likely to receive aggressive end-of-life (EoL) care. Goals of this retrospective cohort study are to compare access to community palliative home care (CPHC), do not resuscitate (DNR) form completion, place of death, and health resource utilization at EoL between English-proficient (EP) and LEP patients with NSCLC in Vancouver, Canada. METHODS: All patients with advanced NSCLC referred in 2016 and received medical care were included. Patients were classified as LEP if seen with a medical interpreter. Descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six patients were referred, 66% EP. Rates of CPHC referral and DNR form completion were the same for both groups (84% and 92%, P = 1.00). LEP patients received earlier access to CPHC (15 v 10 weeks before death, P = .039). Rates of ER visits within 6 months and 30 days of death were 0.89 for EP patients and 0.7 for LEP patients, P = .374, and 0.1 for EP patients and 0.13 for LEP patients, P = .244. Hospitalization rates within 6 months and 30 days of death were 1.4 for EP patients and 1.59 for LEP patients, P = .640, and 0.67 for EP patients and 0.81 for LEP patients, P = .091. EP patients were more likely to have a home death (26% v 14%), whereas LEP patients died in acute care (23% v 14%) or a tertiary palliative care unit (24% v 19%). This was not statistically significant ( P = .335). LEP patients had better median overall survival (8.5 v 5.4 months, P < .001), but when controlled by age, mutation, and EP status, only receipt of palliative-intent systemic therapy was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: EP and LEP patients with NSCLC have similar referral rates to CPHC, DNR form completion, and EoL health resource utilization. The measured EoL variables did not demonstrate significant disparities between EP and LEP patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie Leung
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Selina K. Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Cheryl Ho
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
The impact of specialist community palliative care teams (SCPCT) on acute hospital admission rates in adult patients requiring end of life care: A systematic. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2022; 59:102168. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
24
|
Soltani M, Farahmand M, Pourghaderi AR. Machine learning-based demand forecasting in cancer palliative care home hospitalization. J Biomed Inform 2022; 130:104075. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
25
|
Kremenova Z, Svancara J, Kralova P, Moravec M, Hanouskova K, Knizek-Bonatto M. Does a Hospital Palliative Care Team Have the Potential to Reduce the Cost of a Terminal Hospitalization? A Retrospective Case-Control Study in a Czech Tertiary University Hospital. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:1088-1094. [PMID: 35085466 PMCID: PMC9248342 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: More than 50% of patients worldwide die in hospitals and end-of-life care is costly. We aimed to explore whether support from the palliative team can influence end-of-life costs. Methods: This was a descriptive retrospective case–control study conducted at a Czech tertiary hospital. We explored the difference in daily hospital costs between patients who died with and without the support of the hospital palliative care team from January 2019 to April 2020. Big data from registries of routine visits were used for case–control matching. As secondary outcomes, we compared the groups over the duration of the terminal hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) days, intravenous antibiotics, magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography scans, oncological treatment in the last month of life, and documentation of the dying phase. Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe the data, and differences between the case and control groups were tested using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for numerical data. Results: In total, 213 dyads were identified. The average daily costs were three times lower in the palliative group (4392.4 CZK per day = 171.3 EUR) than in the nonpalliative group (13992.8 CZK per day = 545.8 EUR), and the difference was probably associated with the shorter time spent in the ICU (16% vs. 33% of hospital days). Conclusions: We showed that the integration of the palliative care team in the dying phase can be cost saving. These data could support the implementation of hospital palliative care in developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzana Kremenova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Svancara
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petra Kralova
- Economic Department, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Moravec
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute for Medical Humanities, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Katerina Hanouskova
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mayara Knizek-Bonatto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Seow H, Barbera LC, McGrail K, Burge F, Guthrie DM, Lawson B, Chan KKW, Peacock SJ, Sutradhar R. Effect of Early Palliative Care on End-of-Life Health Care Costs: A Population-Based, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e183-e192. [PMID: 34388021 PMCID: PMC8758090 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the impact of early versus not-early palliative care among cancer decedents on end-of-life health care costs. METHODS Using linked administrative databases, we created a retrospective cohort of cancer decedents between 2004 and 2014 in Ontario, Canada. We identified those who received early palliative care (palliative care service used in the hospital or community 12 to 6 months before death [exposure]). We used propensity score matching to identify a control group of not-early palliative care, hard matched on age, sex, cancer type, and stage at diagnosis. We examined differences in average health system costs (including hospital, emergency department, physician, and home care costs) between groups in the last month of life. RESULTS We identified 144,306 cancer decedents, of which 37% received early palliative care. After matching, we created 36,238 pairs of decedents who received early and not-early (control) palliative care; there were balanced distributions of age, sex, cancer type (24% lung cancer), and stage (25% stage III and IV). Overall, 56.3% of early group versus 66.7% of control group used inpatient care in the last month (P < .001). Considering inpatient hospital costs in the last month of life, the early group used an average (±standard deviation) of $7,105 (±$10,710) versus the control group of $9,370 (±$13,685; P < .001). Overall average costs (±standard deviation) in the last month of life for patients in the early versus control group was $12,753 (±$10,868) versus $14,147 (±$14,288; P < .001). CONCLUSION Receiving early palliative care reduced average health system costs in the last month of life, especially via avoided hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada,Hsien Seow, PhD, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, 699 Concession St, 4th Fl, Rm 4-229, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada; e-mail:
| | - Lisa C. Barbera
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kimberlyn McGrail
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dawn M. Guthrie
- Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Beverley Lawson
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | | | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
White N, Oostendorp LJ, Vickerstaff V, Gerlach C, Engels Y, Maessen M, Tomlinson C, Wens J, Leysen B, Biasco G, Zambrano S, Eychmüller S, Avgerinou C, Chattat R, Ottoboni G, Veldhoven C, Stone P. An online international comparison of palliative care identification in primary care using the Surprise Question. Palliat Med 2022; 36:142-151. [PMID: 34596445 PMCID: PMC8796152 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211048340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Surprise Question ('Would I be surprised if this patient died within 12 months?') identifies patients in the last year of life. It is unclear if 'surprised' means the same for each clinician, and whether their responses are internally consistent. AIM To determine the consistency with which the Surprise Question is used. DESIGN A cross-sectional online study of participants located in Belgium, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Switzerland and UK. Participants completed 20 hypothetical patient summaries ('vignettes'). Primary outcome measure: continuous estimate of probability of death within 12 months (0% [certain survival]-100% [certain death]). A threshold (probability estimate above which Surprise Question responses were consistently 'no') and an inconsistency range (range of probability estimates where respondents vacillated between responses) were calculated. Univariable and multivariable linear regression explored differences in consistency. Trial registration: NCT03697213. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Registered General Practitioners (GPs). Of the 307 GPs who started the study, 250 completed 15 or more vignettes. RESULTS Participants had a consistency threshold of 49.8% (SD 22.7) and inconsistency range of 17% (SD 22.4). Italy had a significantly higher threshold than other countries (p = 0.002). There was also a difference in threshold levels depending on age of clinician, for every yearly increase, participants had a higher threshold. There was no difference in inconsistency between countries (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS There is variation between clinicians regarding the use of the Surprise Question. Over half of GPs were not internally consistent in their responses to the Surprise Question. Future research with standardised terms and real patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola White
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Linda Jm Oostendorp
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,Primary Care and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christina Gerlach
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, and Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Pneumology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Yvonne Engels
- Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maud Maessen
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Tomlinson
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Johan Wens
- Department Family Medicine and Population Health (FamPop), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Bert Leysen
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Guido Biasco
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna & Academy of the Sciences of Palliative Medicine, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sofia Zambrano
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Steffen Eychmüller
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christina Avgerinou
- Primary Care and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rabih Chattat
- Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Carel Veldhoven
- Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Stone
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Teike Lüthi F, MacDonald I, Rosselet Amoussou J, Bernard M, Borasio GD, Ramelet AS. Instruments for the identification of patients in need of palliative care in the hospital setting: a systematic review of measurement properties. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 20:761-787. [PMID: 34812189 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-20-00555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the measurement properties of the available instruments used by clinicians for identifying adults in need of general or specialized palliative care in hospital settings. INTRODUCTION Identification of patients in need of palliative care has been recognized as an area where many health care professionals need guidance. Differentiating between patients who require general palliative care and patients with more complex conditions who need specialized palliative care is particularly challenging. INCLUSION CRITERIA We included development and validation studies that reported on measurement properties (eg, content validity, reliability, or responsiveness) of instruments used by clinicians for identifying adult patients (>18 years and older) in need of palliative care in hospital settings. METHODS Studies published until March 2020 were searched in four databases: Embase.com, Medline Ovid, PubMed, and CINAHL EBSCO. Unpublished studies were searched in Google Scholar, government websites, hospice websites, the Library Network of Western Switzerland, and WorldCat. The search was not restricted by language; however, only studies published in English or French were eligible for inclusion. The title and abstracts of the studies were screened by two independent reviewers against the inclusion criteria. Full-text studies were reviewed for inclusion by two independent reviewers. The quality of the measurement properties of all included studies were assessed independently by two reviewers according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. RESULTS Out of the 23 instruments identified, four instruments were included, as reported in six studies: the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) criteria, the Necesidades Paliativas (NECPAL), the Palliative Care Screening Tool (PCST), and the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT). The overall psychometric quality of all four instruments was insufficient according to the COSMIN criteria, with the main deficit being poor construct description during development. CONCLUSIONS For the early identification of patients needing palliative care in hospital settings, there is poor quality and incomplete evidence according to the COSMIN criteria for the four available instruments. This review highlights the need for further development of the construct being measured. This may be done by conducting additional studies on these instruments or by developing a new instrument for the identification of patients in need of palliative care that addresses the current gaps in construct and structural validity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42020150074.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Teike Lüthi
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, University of Lausanne and Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland Palliative and Supportive Care Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland Psychiatry Library, Education and Research Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Site de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland Bureau d'Echange des Savoirs pour des praTiques exemplaires de soins (BEST): a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Loffredo AJ, Chan GK, Wang DH, Goett R, Isaacs ED, Pearl R, Rosenberg M, Aberger K, Lamba S. United States Best Practice Guidelines for Primary Palliative Care in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med 2021; 78:658-669. [PMID: 34353647 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The growing palliative care needs of emergency department (ED) patients in the United States have motivated the development of ED primary palliative care principles. An expert panel convened to develop best practice guidelines for ED primary palliative care to help guide frontline ED clinicians based on available evidence and consensus opinion of the panel. Results include recommendations for screening and assessment of palliative care needs, ED management of palliative care needs, goals of care conversations, ED palliative care and hospice consults, and transitions of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Loffredo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Garrett K Chan
- Department of Physiologic Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - David H Wang
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Scripps Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Rebecca Goett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
| | - Eric D Isaacs
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rachel Pearl
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mark Rosenberg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, St Joseph's Health, Paterson and Wayne, NJ
| | - Kate Aberger
- Division of Palliative Medicine and Geriatrics, St Joseph's Health, Paterson, NJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Somerset, Somerville, NJ
| | - Sangeeta Lamba
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Predictors of the final place of care of patients with advanced cancer receiving integrated home-based palliative care: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:164. [PMID: 34663303 PMCID: PMC8522009 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00865-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Meeting patients’ preferences for place of care at the end-of-life is an indicator of quality palliative care. Understanding the key elements required for terminal care within an integrated model may inform policy and practice, and consequently increase the likelihood of meeting patients’ preferences. Hence, this study aimed to identify factors associated with the final place of care in patients with advanced cancer receiving integrated, home-based palliative care. Methods This retrospective cohort study included deceased adult patients with advanced cancer who were enrolled in the home-based palliative care service between January 2016 and December 2018. Patients with < 2 weeks’ enrollment in the home-based service, or ≤ 1-week duration at the final place of care, were excluded. The following information were retrieved from patients’ electronic medical records: patients’ and their families’ characteristics, care preferences, healthcare utilization, functional status (measured by the Palliative Performance Scale (PPSv2)), and symptom severity (measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System). Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify independent predictors of the final place of care. Kappa value was calculated to estimate the concordance between actual and preferred place of death. Results A total of 359 patients were included in the study. Home was the most common (58.2%) final place of care, followed by inpatient hospice (23.7%), and hospital (16.7%). Patients who were single or divorced (OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 1.1–27.8), or had older family caregivers (OR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.1–8.8), PPSv2 score ≥ 40% (OR: 9.1; 95% CI: 3.3–24.8), pain score ≥ 2 (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.3–9.8), and non-home death preference (OR: 23.8; 95% CI: 5.4–105.1), were more likely to receive terminal care in the inpatient hospice. Patients who were male (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.0–9.9), or had PPSv2 score ≥ 40% (OR: 8.6; 95% CI: 2.9–26.0), pain score ≥ 2 (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.2–10.3), and non-home death preference (OR: 9.8; 95% CI: 2.1–46.3), were more likely to be hospitalized. Goal-concordance was fair (72.6%, kappa = 0.39). Conclusions Higher functional status, greater pain intensity, and non-home death preference predicted institutionalization as the final place of care. Additionally, single or divorced patients with older family caregivers were more likely to receive terminal care in the inpatient hospice, while males were more likely to be hospitalized. Despite being part of an integrated care model, goal-concordance was sub-optimal. More comprehensive community networks and resources, enhanced pain control, and personalized care planning discussions, are recommended to better meet patients’ preferences for their final place of care. Future research could similarly examine factors associated with the final place of care in patients with advanced non-cancer conditions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00865-5.
Collapse
|
31
|
Quinn KL, Hsu AT, Meaney C, Qureshi D, Tanuseputro P, Seow H, Webber C, Fowler R, Downar J, Goldman R, Chan R, McGrail K, Isenberg SR. Association between high cost user status and end-of-life care in hospitalized patients: A national cohort study of patients who die in hospital. Palliat Med 2021; 35:1671-1681. [PMID: 33781119 PMCID: PMC8532234 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211002045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies comparing end-of-life care between patients who are high cost users of the healthcare system compared to those who are not are lacking. AIM The objective of this study was to describe and measure the association between high cost user status and several health services outcomes for all adults in Canada who died in acute care, compared to non-high cost users and those without prior healthcare use. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS We used administrative data for all adults who died in hospital in Canada between 2011 and 2015 to measure the odds of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), receipt of invasive interventions, major surgery, and receipt of palliative care during the hospitalization in which the patient died. High cost users were defined as those in the top 10% of acute healthcare costs in the year prior to a person's hospitalization in which they died. RESULTS Among 252,648 people who died in hospital, 25,264 were high cost users (10%), 112,506 were non-high cost users (44.5%) and 114,878 had no prior acute care use (45.5%). After adjustment for age and sex, high cost user status was associated with a 14% increased odds of receiving an invasive intervention, a 15% increased odds of having major surgery, and an 8% lower odds of receiving palliative care compared to non-high cost users, but opposite when compared to patients without prior healthcare use. CONCLUSIONS Many patients receive aggressive elements of end-of-life care during the hospitalization in which they die and a substantial number do not receive palliative care. Understanding how this care differs between those who were previously high- and non-high cost users may provide an opportunity to improve end of life care for whom better care planning and provision ought to be an equal priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran L Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Amy T Hsu
- ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher Meaney
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danial Qureshi
- ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Colleen Webber
- ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rob Fowler
- Tory Trauma Program, Sunnybrook Hospital, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - James Downar
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Russell Goldman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care and Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raphael Chan
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kimberlyn McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sarina R Isenberg
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Evans JM, Mackinnon M, Pereira J, Earle CC, Gagnon B, Arthurs E, Gradin S, Walton T, Wright F, Buchman S. Building capacity for palliative care delivery in primary care settings: Mixed-methods evaluation of the INTEGRATE Project. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2021; 67:270-278. [PMID: 33853916 DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6704270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate an intervention aimed at building capacity to deliver palliative care in primary care settings. DESIGN The INTEGRATE Project was a 3-year pilot project involving interprofessional palliative care education and an integrated care model to promote early identification and support of patients with palliative care needs. A concurrent mixed-methods evaluation was conducted using descriptive data, provider surveys before and after implementation, and interviews with providers and managers. SETTING Four primary care practices in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS All providers in each practice were invited to participate. Providers used the "surprise question" as a prompt to determine patient eligibility for inclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Provider attitudes toward and confidence in providing palliative care, use of palliative care tools, delivery of palliative care, and perceived barriers to delivering palliative care. RESULTS A total of 294 patients were identified for early initiation of palliative care, most of whom had multiple comorbid conditions. Results demonstrated improvement in provider confidence to deliver palliative care (30% mean increase, P < .05) and self-reported use of palliative care tools and services (25% mean increase, P < .05). There was substantial variation across practices regarding the percentage of patients identified using the surprise question (0.2% to 1.5%), the number of advance care planning conversations initiated (50% to 90%), and mean time to conversation (13 to 76 days). This variation is attributable, in part, to contextual differences across practices. CONCLUSION A standardized model for the early introduction of palliative care to patients can be integrated into the routine practice of primary care practitioners with appropriate training and support. Additional research is needed to understand the practice factors that contribute to the success of palliative care interventions in primary care and to examine patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna M Evans
- Scientist at Cancer Care Ontario in Toronto and Assistant Professor (status) at the Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation at the University of Toronto
| | | | - José Pereira
- Palliative care physician and was Director of Research at the College of Family Physicians of Canada in Mississauga, Ont, at the time of the study, Dr Gillian Gilchrist Chair in Palliative Care Research at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont, and Scientific Officer at Pallium Canada
| | - Craig C Earle
- Medical oncologist in the Odette Cancer Centre at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Vice-President of Cancer Control at the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Senior Scientist at ICES, and Professor of Medicine at the University of Toronto
| | - Bruno Gagnon
- Palliative care physician and Associate Professor in the Cancer Research Centre in the Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine at Laval University in Quebec
| | - Erin Arthurs
- Senior Analyst in Integrated Care at Cancer Care Ontario at the time of the study
| | - Sharon Gradin
- Group Manager in Integrated Care at Cancer Care Ontario at the time of the study
| | - Tara Walton
- Team Lead in Palliative Care at Cancer Care Ontario
| | - Frances Wright
- Oncologist and affiliate scientist with the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
| | - Sandy Buchman
- Palliative care physician in the Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care in the Sinai Health System in Toronto.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chinen T, Sasabuchi Y, Kotani K, Yamaguchi H. Gap between desired and self-determined roles of general practitioners: a multicentre questionnaire study in Japan. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:162. [PMID: 34330213 PMCID: PMC8325324 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01512-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care physicians have diverse responsibilities. To collaborate with cancer specialists efficiently, they should prioritise roles desired by other collaborators rather than roles based on their own beliefs. No previous studies have reported the priority of roles such clinic-based general practitioners are expected to fulfil across the cancer care continuum. This study clarified the desired roles of clinic-based general practitioners to maximise person-centred cancer care. METHODS A web-based multicentre questionnaire in Japan was distributed to physicians in 2019. Physician roles within the cancer care continuum were divided into 12 categories, including prevention, diagnosis, surgery, follow-up with cancer survivors, chemotherapy, and palliative care. Responses were evaluated by the proportion of three high-priority items to determine the expected roles of clinic-based general practitioners according to responding physicians in similarly designated roles. RESULTS Seventy-eight departments (25% of those recruited) from 49 institutions returned questionnaires. Results revealed that some physicians had lower expectations for clinic-based general practitioners to diagnose cancer, and instead expected them to provide palliative care. However, some physicians expected clinic-based general practitioners to be involved in some treatment and survivorship care, though the clinic-based general practitioners did not report the same priority. CONCLUSION Clinic-based general practitioners prioritised involvement in prevention, diagnoses, and palliative care across the cancer continuum, although lower expectations were placed on them than they thought. Some additional expectations of their involvement in cancer treatment and survivorship care were unanticipated by them. These gaps represent issues that should be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Chinen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Sasabuchi
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Kotani
- Department of Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Hironori Yamaguchi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-Shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
De Panfilis L, Peruselli C, Tanzi S, Botrugno C. AI-based clinical decision-making systems in palliative medicine: ethical challenges. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021; 13:183-189. [PMID: 34257065 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving palliative care (PC) is demanding due to the increase in people with PC needs over the next few years. An early identification of PC needs is fundamental in the care approach: it provides effective patient-centred care and could improve outcomes such as patient quality of life, reduction of the overall length of hospitalisation, survival rate prolongation, the satisfaction of both the patients and caregivers and cost-effectiveness. METHODS We reviewed literature with the objective of identifying and discussing the most important ethical challenges related to the implementation of AI-based data processing services in PC and advance care planning. RESULTS AI-based mortality predictions can signal the need for patients to obtain access to personalised communication or palliative care consultation, but they should not be used as a unique parameter to activate early PC and initiate an ACP. A number of factors must be included in the ethical decision-making process related to initiation of ACP conversations, among which are autonomy and quality of life, the risk of worsening healthcare status, the commitment by caregivers, the patients' psychosocial and spiritual distress and their wishes to initiate EOL discussions CONCLUSIONS: Despite the integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-based services into routine healthcare practice could have a positive effect of promoting early activation of ACP by means of a timely identification of PC needs, from an ethical point of view, the provision of these automated techniques raises a number of critical issues that deserve further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovica De Panfilis
- Bioethics Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Carlo Peruselli
- Palliative Care Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Silvia Tanzi
- Palliative Care Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Carlo Botrugno
- Research Unit on Everyday Bioethics and Ethics of Science, Department of Legal Sciences, University of Florence, Firenze, Toscana, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
A Comparison of the Survival, Place of Death, and Medical Utilization of Terminal Patients Receiving Hospital-Based and Community-Based Palliative Home Care: A Retrospective and Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18147272. [PMID: 34299722 PMCID: PMC8307712 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Revised: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Evidence shows that community-based palliative home care (PHC) provision enhances continuous care and improves patient outcomes. This study compared patient survival, place of death, and medical utilization in community- versus hospital-based PHC. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients aged over 18 referred to either community- or hospital-based PHC from May to December 2018 at a tertiary hospital and surrounding communities in Southern Taiwan. A descriptive analysis, Chi-square test, t-test, and Log-rank test were used for the data analysis of 131 hospital-based PHC patients and 43 community-based PHC patients, with 42 paired patient datasets analyzed after propensity score matching. More nurse visits (p = 0.02), fewer emergency-room visits (p = 0.01), and a shorter waiting time to access PHC (p = 0.02) were found in the community group. There was no difference in the duration of survival and hospitalization between groups. Most hospital-based patients (57%) died in hospice wards, while most community-based patients died at home (52%). Community-based PHC is comparable to hospital-based PHC in Taiwan. Although it has fewer staffing and training requirements, it is an alternative for terminal patients to meet the growing end-of-life care demand.
Collapse
|
36
|
Quinn KL, Stukel T, Huang A, Goldman R, Cram P, Detsky AS, Bell CM. Association Between Attending Physicians' Rates of Referral to Palliative Care and Location of Death in Hospitalized Adults With Serious Illness: A Population-based Cohort Study. Med Care 2021; 59:604-611. [PMID: 34100462 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who receive palliative care are less likely to die in hospital. OBJECTIVE To measure the association between physician rates of referral to palliative care and location of death in hospitalized adults with serious illness. RESEARCH DESIGN Population-based decedent cohort study using linked health administrative data in Ontario, Canada. SUBJECTS A total of 7866 physicians paired with 130,862 hospitalized adults in their last year of life who died of serious illness between 2010 and 2016. EXPOSURE Physician annual rate of referral to palliative care (high, average, low). MEASURES Odds of death in hospital versus home, adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS There was nearly 4-fold variation in the proportion of patients receiving palliative care during follow-up based on attending physician referral rates: high 42.4% (n=24,433), average 24.7% (n=10,772), low 10.7% (n=6721). Referral to palliative care was also associated with being referred by palliative care specialists and in urban teaching hospitals. The proportion of patients who died in hospital according to physician referral rate were 47.7% (high), 50.1% (average), and 52.8% (low). Hospitalized patients cared for by a physician who referred to palliative care at a high rate had lower risk of dying in hospital than at home compared with patients who were referred by a physician with an average rate of referral [adjusted odds ratio 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.95; number needed to treat=57 (interquartile range 41-92)] and by a physician with a low rate of referral [adjusted odds ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.84; number needed to treat =28 patients (interquartile range 23-44)]. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE An attending physicians' rates of referral to palliative care is associated with a lower risk of dying in hospital. Therefore, patients who are cared for by physicians with higher rates of referral to palliative care are less likely to die in hospital and more likely to die at home. Standardizing referral to palliative care may help reduce physician-level variation as a barrier to access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran L Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
- ICES
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
- Department of Medicine
| | - Thérèse Stukel
- ICES
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
| | | | - Russell Goldman
- Interdepartmental Division of Palliative Care, Sinai Health System
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Cram
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
- ICES
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
- Department of Medicine
| | - Allan S Detsky
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
- Department of Medicine
| | - Chaim M Bell
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
- ICES
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
- Department of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mracek J, Earp M, Sinnarajah A. Palliative home care and emergency department visits in the last 30 and 90 days of life: a retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2021-002889. [PMID: 34187877 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evaluate the association of specialist palliative home care (HC) on emergency department (ED) visits in the 30 and 90 days prior to death. METHODS This retrospective cohort study using administrative data identified 6976 adults deceased from cancer between 2008 and 2015, living ≥180 days after diagnosis of cancer, and residing in the urban Calgary Zone of Alberta Health Services. All palliative HC and generalist HC services were examined. Regression analyses examined the relationships of HC type to ED visits in the last 30 or 90 days of life. RESULTS In the last 30 days of life, compared with patients receiving palliative HC, patients receiving only generalist HC, or no HC, were more likely to visit the ED (OR)generalist-HC 1.19; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.34; ORno-HC 1.54; 95% CI 1.31 to 1.82). In the last 90 days of life, compared with patients receiving palliative HC, those receiving generalist HC (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.67) and no HC (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.39 to 1.99) had increased odds of visiting the ED. CONCLUSIONS Receiving generalist HC and no HC was associated with increased odds of visiting the ED in the last 30 and 90 days of life, when compared with patients receiving palliative HC. Improving access to palliative HC for patients at high risk of visiting the ED may reduce ED visits and acute care costs and improve quality of life in the last 90 days of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Madalene Earp
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aynharan Sinnarajah
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Palliative & End of Life Care, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Brown CRL, Webber C, Seow HY, Howard M, Hsu AT, Isenberg SR, Jiang M, Smith GA, Spruin S, Tanuseputro P. Impact of physician-based palliative care delivery models on health care utilization outcomes: A population-based retrospective cohort study. Palliat Med 2021; 35:1170-1180. [PMID: 33884934 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211009440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing involvement of palliative care generalists may improve access to palliative care. It is unknown, however, if their involvement with and without palliative care specialists are associated with different outcomes. AIM To describe physician-based models of palliative care and their association with healthcare utilization outcomes including: emergency department visits, acute hospitalizations and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in last 30 days of life; and, place of death. DESIGN Population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health administrative data. We used descriptive statistics to compare outcomes across three models (generalist-only palliative care; consultation palliative care, comprising of both generalist and specialist care; and specialist-only palliative care) and conducted a logistic regression for community death. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS All adults aged 18-105 who died in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2017. RESULTS Of the 231,047 decedents who received palliative services, 40.3% received generalist, 32.3% consultation and 27.4% specialist palliative care. Across models, we noted minimal to modest variation for decedents with at least one emergency department visit (50%-59%), acute hospitalization (64%-69%) or ICU admission (7%-17%), as well as community death (36%-40%). In our adjusted analysis, receipt of a physician home visit was a stronger predictor for increased likelihood of community death (odds ratio 9.6, 95% confidence interval 9.4-9.8) than palliative care model (generalist vs consultation palliative care 2.0, 1.9-2.0). CONCLUSION The generalist palliative care model achieved similar healthcare utilization outcomes as consultation and specialist models. Including a physician home visit component in each model may promote community death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R L Brown
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Colleen Webber
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,ICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Hsien-Yeang Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Amy T Hsu
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,ICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sarina R Isenberg
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mengzhu Jiang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glenys A Smith
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,ICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Spruin
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,ICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,ICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Krause M, Ditscheid B, Lehmann T, Jansky M, Marschall U, Meißner W, Nauck F, Wedding U, Freytag A. Effectiveness of two types of palliative home care in cancer and non-cancer patients: A retrospective population-based study using claims data. Palliat Med 2021; 35:1158-1169. [PMID: 34092140 PMCID: PMC8189010 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211013666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparative effectiveness of different types of palliative homecare is sparsely researched internationally-despite its potential to inform necessary decisions in palliative care infrastructure development. In Germany, specialized palliative homecare delivered by multi-professional teams has increased in recent years and factors beyond medical need seem to drive its involvement and affect the application of primary palliative care, delivered by general practitioners who are supported by nursing services. AIM To compare effectiveness of primary palliative care and specialized palliative homecare in reducing potentially aggressive interventions at the end-of-life in cancer and non-cancer. DESIGN Retrospective population-based study with claims data from 95,962 deceased adults in Germany in 2016 using multivariable regression analyses. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS Patients having received primary palliative care or specialized palliative homecare (alone or in addition to primary palliative care), for at least 14 days before death, differentiating between cancer and non-cancer patients. RESULTS Rates of potentially aggressive interventions in most indicators were higher in primary palliative care than in specialized palliative homecare (p < 0.01), in both cancer and non-cancer patients: death in hospital (odds ratio (OR) 4.541), hospital care (OR 2.720), intensive care treatment (OR 6.749), chemotherapy (OR 2.173), and application of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (OR 4.476), but not for parenteral nutrition (OR 0.477). CONCLUSION Specialized palliative homecare is more strongly associated with reduction of potentially aggressive interventions than primary palliative care in the last days of life. Future research should identify elements of specialized palliative homecare applicable for more effective primary palliative care, too. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00014730).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Krause
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Bianka Ditscheid
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Thomas Lehmann
- Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Maximiliane Jansky
- Clinic for Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Winfried Meißner
- Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Friedemann Nauck
- Clinic for Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Wedding
- Department of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Antje Freytag
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Teike Lüthi F, Mabire C, Rosselet Amoussou J, Bernard M, Borasio GD, Ramelet AS. Instruments for the identification of patients in need of palliative care: protocol for a systematic review of measurement properties. JBI Evid Synth 2021; 18:1144-1153. [PMID: 32813369 DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the psychometric properties of available clinician-reported instruments developed to identify patients in need of general and specialized palliative care in acute care settings. INTRODUCTION Identification of patients in need of palliative care has been recognized as an area where many health care professionals need guidance. Differentiating between patients who require general palliative care and patients with more complex conditions who need specialized palliative care is particularly challenging. To our knowledge, no dedicated instruments are available to date to assist health care professionals to make this identification. INCLUSION CRITERIA Included studies will report on i) instruments aiming to identify patients in need of palliative care, ii) adult patients in need of palliative care in acute-care settings, iii) clinician-reported outcome measures, or iv) the development process or one or more of its measurement properties. Studies conducted in intensive care units, emergency departments, or nursing homes will be excluded. METHODS We will search for studies published in English and French in a variety of sources, including Embase, Medline Ovid SP, PubMed, CINAHL EBSCO, Google Scholar, government websites, and hospice websites. All citations will be screened and selected by two independent reviewers. Data extraction, quality assessment, and syntheses of included studies will be performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42020150074.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Teike Lüthi
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Mabire
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Bureau d'Echange des Savoirs pour des praTiques exemplaires de soins (BEST): A JBI Centre of Excellence
| | - Joëlle Rosselet Amoussou
- Psychiatry Library, Education and Research Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Site de Cery, Prilly, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Anne-Sylvie Ramelet
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Bureau d'Echange des Savoirs pour des praTiques exemplaires de soins (BEST): A JBI Centre of Excellence
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Earp M, Cai P, Fong A, Blacklaws K, Pham TM, Shack L, Sinnarajah A. Hospital-based acute care in the last 30 days of life among patients with chronic disease that received early, late or no specialist palliative care: a retrospective cohort study of eight chronic disease groups. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044196. [PMID: 33762238 PMCID: PMC7993357 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For eight chronic diseases, evaluate the association of specialist palliative care (PC) exposure and timing with hospital-based acute care in the last 30 days of life. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using administrative data. SETTING Alberta, Canada between 2007 and 2016. PARTICIPANTS 47 169 adults deceased from: (1) cancer, (2) heart disease, (3) dementia, (4) stroke, (5) chronic lower respiratory disease (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)), (6) liver disease, (7) neurodegenerative disease and (8) renovascular disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The proportion of decedents who experienced high hospital-based acute care in the last 30 days of life, indicated by ≥two emergency department (ED) visit, ≥two hospital admissions,≥14 days of hospitalisation, any intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or death in hospital. Relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) of hospital-based acute care given early specialist PC exposure (≥90 days before death), adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS In an analysis of all decedents, early specialist PC exposure was associated with a 32% reduction in risk of any hospital-based acute care as compared with those with no PC exposure (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.71; RD 0.16, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.17). The association was strongest in cancer-specific analyses (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.55; RD 0.31, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.33) and renal disease-specific analyses (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.84; RD 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.34), but a~25% risk reduction was observed for each of heart disease, COPD, neurodegenerative diseases and stroke. Early specialist PC exposure was associated with reducing risk of four out of five individual indicators of high hospital-based acute care in the last 30 days of life, including ≥two ED visit,≥two hospital admission, any ICU admission and death in hospital. CONCLUSIONS Early specialist PC exposure reduced the risk of hospital-based acute care in the last 30 days of life for all chronic disease groups except dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madalene Earp
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Pin Cai
- Clinical Workforce Planning, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew Fong
- Data & Analytics, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kelly Blacklaws
- Data & Analytics, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Truong-Minh Pham
- Surveillance and Reporting, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lorraine Shack
- Surveillance and Reporting, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aynharan Sinnarajah
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Palliative & End of Life Care Program, Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Seow H, Sutradhar R, Burge F, McGrail K, Guthrie DM, Lawson B, Oz UE, Chan K, Peacock S, Barbera L. End-of-life outcomes with or without early palliative care: a propensity score matched, population-based cancer cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e041432. [PMID: 33579764 PMCID: PMC7883853 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether cancer decedents who received palliative care early (ie, >6 months before death) and not-early had different risk of using hospital care and supportive home care in the last month of life. DESIGN/SETTING We identified a population-based cohort of cancer decedents between 2004 and 2014 in Ontario, Canada using linked administrative data. Analysis occurred between August 2017 to March 2019. PARTICIPANTS We propensity-score matched decedents on receiving early or not-early palliative care using billing claims. We created two groups of matched pairs: one that had Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) home care assessments in the exposure period (Yes-RAI group) and one that did not (No-RAI group) to control for confounders uniquely available in the assessment, such as health instability and pain. The outcomes were the absolute risk difference between matched pairs in receiving hospital care, supportive home care or hospital death. RESULTS In the No-RAI group, we identified 36 238 pairs who received early and not-early palliative care. Those in the early palliative care group versus not-early group had a lower absolute risk difference of dying in hospital (-10.0%) and receiving hospital care (-10.4%) and a higher absolute risk difference of receiving supportive home care (23.3%). In the Yes-RAI group, we identified 3586 pairs, where results were similar in magnitude and direction. CONCLUSIONS Cancer decedents who received palliative care earlier than 6 months before death compared with those who did not had a lower absolute risk difference of receiving hospital care and dying in hospital, and an increased absolute risk difference of receiving supportive home care in the last month of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Kimberlyn McGrail
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dawn M Guthrie
- Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beverley Lawson
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Urun Erbas Oz
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelvin Chan
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart Peacock
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lisa Barbera
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wang RF, Lai CC, Fu PY, Huang YC, Huang SJ, Chu D, Lin SP, Chaou CH, Hsu CY, Chen HH. A-qCPR risk score screening model for predicting 1-year mortality associated with hospice and palliative care in the emergency department. Palliat Med 2021; 35:408-416. [PMID: 33198575 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320972041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluating the need for palliative care and predicting its mortality play important roles in the emergency department. AIM We developed a screening model for predicting 1-year mortality. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors associated with 1-year mortality. Our risk scores based on these significant risk factors were then developed. Its predictive validity performance was evaluated using area under receiving operating characteristic analysis and leave-one-out cross-validation. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 15 years or older were enrolled from June 2015 to May 2016 in the emergency department. RESULTS We identified five independent risk factors, each of which was assigned a number of points proportional to its estimated regression coefficient: age (0.05 points per year), qSOFA ⩾ 2 (1), Cancer (4), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score ⩾ 2 (2), and Do-Not-Resuscitate status (3). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of our screening tool given the cutoff larger than 3 points were 0.99 (0.98-0.99), 0.31 (0.29-0.32), 0.26 (0.24-0.27), and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), respectively. Those with screening scores larger than 9 points corresponding to 64.0% (60.0-67.9%) of 1-year mortality were prioritized for consultation and communication. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curves for the point system was 0.84 (0.83-0.85) for the cross-validation model. CONCLUSIONS A-qCPR risk scores provide a good screening tool for assessing patient prognosis. Routine screening for end-of-life using this tool plays an important role in early and efficient physician-patient communications regarding hospice and palliative needs in the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruei-Fang Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei
| | - Chao-Chih Lai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei
- Master of Public Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - Ping-Yeh Fu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei
| | | | | | - Dachen Chu
- Superintendent, Taipei City Hospital
- National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Shih-Pin Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei
| | - Chung-Hsien Chaou
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan City
| | - Chen-Yang Hsu
- Master of Public Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei
- Da-Chung Hospital, Miaoli
| | - Hsiu-Hsi Chen
- Division Biostatistics, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gamblin V, Prod'homme C, Lecoeuvre A, Bimbai AM, Luu J, Hazard PA, Da Silva A, Villet S, Le Deley MC, Penel N. Home hospitalization for palliative cancer care: factors associated with unplanned hospital admissions and death in hospital. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:24. [PMID: 33499835 PMCID: PMC7839201 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00720-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Home hospitalization at the end of life can sometimes be perturbed by unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs, defined as any admission that is not part of a preplanned care procedure), which increase the likelihood of death in hospital. The objectives were to describe the occurrence and causes of UHAs in cancer patients receiving end-of-life care at home, and to identify factors associated with UHAs and death in hospital. Methods A retrospective, single-center study (performed at a regional cancer center in the city of Lille, northern France) of advanced cancer patients discharged to home hospitalization between January 2014 and December 2017. We estimated the incidence of UHA over time using Kaplan-Meier method and Kalbfleish and Prentice method. We investigated factors associated with the risk UHA in cause-specific Cox models. We evaluated factors associated with death in hospital in logistic regressions. Results One hundred and forty-two patients were included in the study. Eighty-two patients (57.7 %) experienced one or more UHAs, a high proportion of which occurred within 1 month after discharge to home. Most UHAs were related to physical symptoms and were initiated by the patient’s family physician. A post-discharge palliative care consultation was associated with a significantly lower incidence of UHAs. Sixty-five patients (47.8 % of the deaths) died in hospital. In a multivariate analysis, living alone and the presence of one or more children at home were associated with death in hospital. Conclusions More than 40 % of cancer patients receiving end of life home hospitalization were not readmitted to hospital, reflecting the effectiveness of this type of palliative care setting. However, over half of the UHAs were due to an acute intercurrent event. Our results suggest that more efforts should be focused on anticipating these events at home – primarily via better upstream coordination between hospital physicians and family physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Gamblin
- Palliative Care Unit, Oscar Lambret Center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59300, Lille, France.
| | - Chloé Prod'homme
- Palliative Care Unit, Lille University Hospital and Medical School, 59000, Lille, France.,ETHICS (Experiment, Transhumanism, Human Interactions, Care and Society) - EA7446, Lille Catholic University, 59800, Lille, France
| | - Adrien Lecoeuvre
- Direction of Research and Innovation, Oscar Lambret Center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France
| | - André -Michel Bimbai
- Direction of Research and Innovation, Oscar Lambret Center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France
| | - Joël Luu
- Direction of Research and Innovation, Oscar Lambret Center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France
| | | | - Arlette Da Silva
- Palliative Care Unit, Oscar Lambret Center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59300, Lille, France
| | - Stéphanie Villet
- Palliative Care Unit, Oscar Lambret Center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59300, Lille, France
| | - Marie-Cécile Le Deley
- Direction of Research and Innovation, Oscar Lambret Center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France.,Paris-Saclay University, Paris-Sud University, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Nicolas Penel
- Direction of Research and Innovation, Oscar Lambret Center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France.,Lille University Hospital and Medical School, 59045, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Goodwin L, Proctor A, Kirby K, Black S, Pocock L, Richardson S, Stonehouse J, Taylor H, Voss S, Benger J. Staff stakeholder views on the role of UK paramedics in advance care planning for patients in their last year of life. PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/09699260.2021.1872140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Goodwin
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus (1H14), Blackberry Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Alyesha Proctor
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus (1H14), Blackberry Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Kim Kirby
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus (1H14), Blackberry Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
- South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Eagle Way, Exeter EX2 7HY, UK
| | - Sarah Black
- South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Eagle Way, Exeter EX2 7HY, UK
| | - Lucy Pocock
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Sally Richardson
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus (1H14), Blackberry Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Joanne Stonehouse
- South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Eagle Way, Exeter EX2 7HY, UK
| | - Hazel Taylor
- Research Design Service – South West, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8AE, UK
| | - Sarah Voss
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus (1H14), Blackberry Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Jonathan Benger
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Glenside Campus (1H14), Blackberry Hill, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
- Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ovares JEP. Los cuidados paliativos domiciliares reducen las consultas a urgencias y muertes en centros de salud a un menor costo. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GERIATRIA E GERONTOLOGIA 2021. [DOI: 10.1590/1981-22562021024.210112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumen Objetivos Comparar los tipos de asistencia domiciliar geriátrica y paliativa para determinar cuál obtiene mejores resultados en los pacientes con demencia avanzada. Métodos El presente es un estudio de cohorte retrospectiva. Se incluyeron pacientes con demencia avanzada ingresados al programa de Atención Comunitaria Geriátrica de un hospital geriátrico público de Costa Rica en el periodo entre enero de 2018 y junio de 2019. Ellos se dividieron en dos grupos dependiendo del equipo especializado que realizó la atención domiciliaria y se analizaron sus características sociodemográficas y clínicas. Posteriormente, se analizaron los datos generados de los registros médicos sobre consultas de emergencia, hospitalización, lugar de defunción y costo de la visita generados por cada paciente entre junio de 2018 y diciembre de 2019. Se compararon 192 pacientes con demencia avanzada Global Dementia Scale 7 visitados por el equipo geriátricos especializado domiciliar con 19 de visitados por el equipo de cuidados paliativos especializado domiciliar del Hospital Geriátrico Nacional. Resultados Se analizaron 226 datos generados (192 por el programa de geriatría y 34 por el de paliativos). Los que recibían atención domiciliaria por un equipo paliativo tenían menos probabilidades de acudir a la sala de emergencias y morir en un centro de salud en comparación con aquellos que reciben atención domiciliaria por un equipo geriátrico, con un costo menor. Conclusiones El programa de cuidado paliativo especializado domiciliar reduce las consultas de emergencia, la muerte en el domicilio y los costos de atención en pacientes con demencia avanzada en comparación con el programa geriátrico.
Collapse
|
47
|
Cross SH, Lakin JR, Mendu M, Mandel EI, Warraich HJ. Trends in Place of Death for Individuals With Deaths Attributed to Advanced Chronic or End-Stage Kidney Disease in the United States. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 61:112-120.e1. [PMID: 32791183 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT An important aspect of end-of-life care, place of death is understudied in advanced chronic (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). OBJECTIVE We sought to examine trends and factors associated with where advanced CKD/ESKD patients die. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using mortality data from 2003 to 2017 for deaths attributed primarily to advanced CKD/ESKD in the United States. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2017, 222,247 deaths were attributed to advanced CKD/ESKD. From 2003 to 2017, deaths occurring in hospitals declined from 56.0% (n = 5356) to 35.6% (n = 7764), whereas increases occurred in deaths at home (13.5% [n = 1292] to 24.3% [n = 5306]), nursing facilities (18.6% [n = 1776] to 19.3% [n = 4221]), and hospice facilities (0.3% [n = 29] to 13.4% [n = 2917]). Nonwhite race was associated with increased odds of hospital death (Black [OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.55, 1.62]; Native American [OR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.32, 1.63]; Asian [OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.32, 1.55] and reduced odds of nursing facility (Black [OR = 0.622; 95% CI = 0.600, 0.645]; Native American [OR = 0.638; 95% CI = 0.572, 0.712]; Asian [OR = 0.574; 95% CI = 0.533, 0.619], or hospice facility death (Black [OR = 0.843; 95% CI = 0.773, 0.918]; Native American [OR = 0.380; 95% CI = 0.289, 0.500]; Asian [OR = 0.609; 95% CI = 0.502, 0.739]). Older age was associated with reduced odds of hospital death (≥85 [OR = 0.334; 95% CI = 0.312, 0.358]) and increased odds of home (≥85 [OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.43, 1.68]), nursing facility (≥85 [OR = 3.09; 95% CI = 2.76, 3.45]) or hospice facility death (≥85 [OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.49, 1.72]). CONCLUSIONS Hospitals remain the most common place of death from advanced CKD/ESKD; however, the proportion of home, nursing facility, and hospice facility deaths have increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah H Cross
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Joshua R Lakin
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mallika Mendu
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Quality and Safety, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ernest I Mandel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Haider J Warraich
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Cardiology Section, Department of Medicine, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Luta X, Diernberger K, Bowden J, Droney J, Howdon D, Schmidlin K, Rodwin V, Hall P, Marti J. Healthcare trajectories and costs in the last year of life: a retrospective primary care and hospital analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2020:bmjspcare-2020-002630. [PMID: 33268473 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyse healthcare utilisation and costs in the last year of life in England, and to study variation by cause of death, region of patient residence and socioeconomic status. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study. Individuals aged 60 years and over (N=108 510) who died in England between 2010 and 2017 were included in the study. RESULTS Healthcare utilisation and costs in the last year of life increased with proximity to death, particularly in the last month of life. The mean total costs were higher among males (£8089) compared with females (£6898) and declined with age at death (£9164 at age 60-69 to £5228 at age 90+) with inpatient care accounting for over 60% of total costs. Costs decline with age at death (0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.95, p<0.0001 for age group 90+ compared with to the reference category age group 60-69) and were lower among females (0.91, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.92, p<0.0001 compared with males). Costs were higher (1.09, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.14, p<0.0001) in London compared with other regions. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare utilisation and costs in the last year of life increase with proximity to death, particularly in the last month of life. Finer geographical data and information on healthcare supply would allow further investigating whether people receiving more planned care by primary care and or specialist palliative care towards the end of life require less acute care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xhyljeta Luta
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Katharina Diernberger
- The University of Edinburgh Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joanna Bowden
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Specialist Palliative Care Service, Fife Palliative Care Service, Kirkcaldy, UK
| | - Joanne Droney
- Palliative Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Howdon
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Kurt Schmidlin
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, BE, Switzerland
| | - Victor Rodwin
- Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, New York, New York, USA
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland
| | - Peter Hall
- University of Edinburgh Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joachim Marti
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nurses Training and Capacitation for Palliative Care in Emergency Units: A Systematic Review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56120648. [PMID: 33256039 PMCID: PMC7759785 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56120648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Palliative care (PC) prevents and alleviates patients´ suffering to improve their quality of life in their last days. In recent years, there has been an increase in visits to the emergency services (ES) by patients who may need this type of care. The aims were to describe the training and capacitation of nurses from ES in PC. Accordingly, a systematic review was performed. Materials and Methods: Medline, Scopus, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were used. The search equation was “Palliative care and nursing care and emergency room”. A total of 12 studies were selected. Results: The studies agree on the need for training professionals in PC to provide a higher quality care, better identification of patient needs and to avoid unnecessary invasive processes. Similarly, the implementation of a collaborative model between ES and PC, the existence of a PC specialized team in the ES or proper palliative care at home correspond to a decrease in emergency visits, a lower number of hospitalizations or days admitted, and a decrease in hospital deaths. Conclusions: The development of PC in the different areas of patient care is necessary. Better palliative care leads to a lower frequency of ES by terminal patients, which has a positive impact on their quality of life. Access to PC from the emergency unit should be one of the priority health objectives due to increment in the aged population susceptible to this type of care.
Collapse
|
50
|
Jordan RI, Allsop MJ, ElMokhallalati Y, Jackson CE, Edwards HL, Chapman EJ, Deliens L, Bennett MI. Duration of palliative care before death in international routine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2020; 18:368. [PMID: 33239021 PMCID: PMC7690105 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01829-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early provision of palliative care, at least 3-4 months before death, can improve patient quality of life and reduce burdensome treatments and financial costs. However, there is wide variation in the duration of palliative care received before death reported across the research literature. This study aims to determine the duration of time from initiation of palliative care to death for adults receiving palliative care across the international literature. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018094718). Six databases were searched for articles published between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2018: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Global Health, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library, as well undertaking citation list searches. Following PRISMA guidelines, articles were screened using inclusion (any study design reporting duration from initiation to death in adults palliative care services) and exclusion (paediatric/non-English language studies, trials influencing the timing of palliative care) criteria. Quality appraisal was completed using Hawker's criteria and the main outcome was the duration of palliative care (median/mean days from initiation to death). RESULTS One hundred sixty-nine studies from 23 countries were included, involving 11,996,479 patients. Prior to death, the median duration from initiation of palliative care to death was 18.9 days (IQR 0.1), weighted by the number of participants. Significant differences between duration were found by disease type (15 days for cancer vs 6 days for non-cancer conditions), service type (19 days for specialist palliative care unit, 20 days for community/home care, and 6 days for general hospital ward) and development index of countries (18.91 days for very high development vs 34 days for all other levels of development). Forty-three per cent of studies were rated as 'good' quality. Limitations include a preponderance of data from high-income countries, with unclear implications for low- and middle-income countries. CONCLUSIONS Duration of palliative care is much shorter than the 3-4 months of input by a multidisciplinary team necessary in order for the full benefits of palliative care to be realised. Furthermore, the findings highlight inequity in access across patient, service and country characteristics. We welcome more consistent terminology and methodology in the assessment of duration of palliative care from all countries, alongside increased reporting from less-developed settings, to inform benchmarking, service evaluation and quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta I Jordan
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew J Allsop
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Yousuf ElMokhallalati
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Catriona E Jackson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Helen L Edwards
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Emma J Chapman
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Luc Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michael I Bennett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|