Risk of amputation with canagliflozin across categories of age and cardiovascular risk in three US nationwide databases: cohort study

Cardiovascular Effectiveness and Safety of Antidiabetic Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease: Systematic Review

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is an atherosclerotic condition commonly complicating type 2 diabetes (T2D), leading to poor quality of life and increased risk of major adverse lower-limb (MALE) and cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE). Therapeutic management of PAD in T2D patients is much more arduous, often due to bilateral, multi-vessel, and distal vascular involvement, in addition to increased systemic polyvascular atherosclerotic burden. On the other hand, the pathophysiological link between PAD and T2D is very complex, involving mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction and increased subclinical inflammation in addition to chronic hyperglycemia. Therefore, the clinical approach should not ignore vascular protection with the aim of reducing limb and overall CV events besides a mere glucose-lowering effect. However, the choice of the best medications in this setting is challenging due to low-grade evidence or lacking targeted studies in PAD patients. The present review highlighted the strong relationship between T2D and PAD, focusing on the best treatment strategy to reduce CV risk and prevent PAD occurrence and worsening in patients with T2D. The Medline databases were searched for studies including T2D and PAD up to June 2024 and reporting the CV effectiveness and safety of the most used glucose-lowering agents, with no restriction on PAD definition, study design, or country. The main outcomes considered were MACE-including nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and CV death-and MALE-defined as lower-limb complications, amputations, or need for revascularization. To the best of our current knowledge, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors represent the best choice to reduce CV risk in T2D and PAD settings, but a personalized approach should be considered. GLP-1 receptor agonists should be preferred in subjects with prevalent atherosclerotic burden and a history of previous MALE, while SGLT2 inhibitors should be used in those with heart failure if overall CV benefits outweigh the risk of lower-limb complications.

Amputation Risk in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients Treated with SGLT-2 Inhibitors: A Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

SGLT-2 inhibitors, prescribed for type 2 diabetes, have a heightened risk of amputation. The FDA issued a warning in May 2017, leading to the inclusion of a cautionary label. Vigilance is essential for patients and healthcare providers to promptly identify and address potential limb complications associated with the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, covering the period from inception to May 2024. This systematic literature review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were predefined, and data extraction was performed to summarize the findings.

RESULT

A total of 12 randomized control trial (RCT) studies were included in the present systematic review. 37,657 (54.89%) participants were randomly assigned to receive the different interventions of SGLT-2 inhibitor, whereas 30,959 (45.11%) received a placebo. Overall, 618 events were reported in the treatment group, whereas 396 events were reported in the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors did not have any significant difference in amputation occurrences compared to placebo across various studies. However, canagliflozin usage has led to higher amputation events in certain trials.

The association between sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and adverse clinical events in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the common clinical adverse events associated with sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use compared to placebo in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Twelve articles were chosen via a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. We screened for randomised placebo-controlled trials. The main clinical adverse events included diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA), amputation, and volume depletion. We performed heterogeneity testing and assessment of publication bias.

RESULTS

In all, 65 600 patients were included in the analysis. Compared to placebo, SGLT2i may increase the risk of DKA and volume depletion in patients with CKD with or without type 2 diabetes. For DKA, compared with placebo, the combined effect of SGLT2i was OR 2.03 (95% CI: 1.28 to 3.23 I2: 2.3%, P: 0.420). For volume depletion, compared with placebo, the combined effect of SGLT2i was OR 1.24 (95% CI: 1.13 to 1.37 I2: 0.0%, P: 0.484). For the risk of amputation, despite low heterogeneity for amputation, the forest plot indicated no statistical significance, and thus it cannot be concluded that SGLT2i increases the risk of amputation. Compared with placebo, the combined effect of SGLT2i was OR 1.10 (95% CI: 0.94 to 1.29 I2: 0.0%, P: 0.642).

CONCLUSION

The use of SGLT2i may increase the risk of DKA and volume depletion in patients with chronic renal insufficiency with or without type 2 diabetes.

A Non-Coronary, Peripheral Arterial Atherosclerotic Disease (Carotid, Renal, Lower Limb) in Elderly Patients-A Review PART II-Pharmacological Approach for Management of Elderly Patients with Peripheral Atherosclerotic Lesions outside Coronary Territory

BACKGROUND

Aging is a key risk factor for atherosclerosis progression that is associated with increased incidence of ischemic events in supplied organs, including stroke, coronary events, limb ischemia, or renal failure. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and major disability in adults ≥ 75 years of age. Atherosclerotic occlusive disease affects everyday activity, quality of life, and it is associated with reduced life expectancy. As most multicenter randomized trials exclude elderly and very elderly patients, particularly those with severe comorbidities, physical or cognitive dysfunctions, frailty, or residence in a nursing home, there is insufficient data on the management of older patients presenting with atherosclerotic lesions outside coronary territory. This results in serious critical gaps in knowledge and a lack of guidance on the appropriate medical treatment. In addition, due to a variety of severe comorbidities in the elderly, the average daily number of pills taken by octogenarians exceeds nine. Polypharmacy frequently results in drug therapy problems related to interactions, drug toxicity, falls with injury, delirium, and non-adherence. Therefore, we have attempted to gather data on the medical treatment in patients with extra-cardiac atherosclerotic lesions indicating where there is some evidence of the management in elderly patients and where there are gaps in evidence-based medicine. Public PubMed databases were searched to review existing evidence on the effectiveness of lipid-lowering, antithrombotic, and new glucose-lowering medications in patients with extra-cardiac atherosclerotic occlusive disease.

Safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors on amputation across categories of baseline cardiovascular disease and diuretics use in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM

To assess the risk of amputation associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) among patients with type 2 diabetes, across categories of baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diuretic use (DU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an active comparator, new-user cohort study using Korea's nationwide claims data (2015-2020). The study cohort consisted of patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated SGLT2is or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is). Cohort entry was defined by first prescription date. We then classified patients into four discrete subcohorts based on their baseline status of CVD and DU as (1) CVD+/DU+, (2) CVD+/DU-, (3) CVD-/DU+ and (4) CVD-/DU-. We performed 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching within each cohort and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of amputation with SGLT2is versus DPP4is using Cox models.

RESULTS

We identified 219 900 PS-matched pairs of SGLT2is and DPP4is (CVD+/DU+, n = 11 719; CVD+/DU-, n = 26 092; CVD-/DU+, n = 26 894; and CVD-/DU-, n = 155 195), with well-balanced baseline covariates across all cohorts. Significantly lower risks of amputation with SGLT2is versus DPP4is were found in CVD+/DU+ (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.90), CVD+/DU- (0.45, 0.21-0.99) and CVD-/DU- (0.48, 0.33-0.70), but not in CVD-/DU+ (0.54, 0.26-1.12). Consistent trends in estimates were found across various sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating SGLT2is against DPP4is did not increase the risk of amputation across patient populations of varying vulnerability. These findings based on routine practice will reassure clinicians of the safety of SGLT2is with regard to amputation risk in selected high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.

Utilization and impact of SLGT2 inhibitors among diabetes patients in a nationally representative survey: Findings from NHANES 2013-2020

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The purpose of this study is to examine patterns of utilization for antidiabetic medications among a nationally representative sample of the US population following the introduction of SGLT2 inhibitors in 2013.

METHODS

The study utilized National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2013 to 2020 to identify adult patients with diabetes using antidiabetic medication. The proportion of patients with diabetes using different antidiabetic medications, including SGLT2 inhibitors, was plotted over time. To assess the statistical significance of the utilization trend of SGLT2 inhibitors and other oral antidiabetics, logistic regression models were employed.

RESULTS

A weighted total of 26,421,357 individuals included in our study were diagnosed with diabetes. Among these, 18,751,659 diabetes patients were identified as medication users, with 1,058,686 (5.7 %) of them taking SGLT2 inhibitors. Over the 7-year study period, the percentage of patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors increased 21-fold, from 0.4 % in 2013-2014 to 9.4 % in 2017-2020. Despite this substantial increase, the utilization of other second-line antidiabetic agents, such as sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and TZDs, remained relatively stable during the same period.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitor utilization has significantly increased among US diabetes patients; however, their rise has not substantially impacted the use of other second-line antidiabetic agents. Further research is needed to understand the social determinants and potential barriers affecting the broader adoption of these beneficial medications.

Safety of sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

Aims: This study aimed to investigate the association between the use of sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), lower limb amputation (LLA), urinary tract infections (UTI), genital tract infections (GTI), bone fracture, and hypoglycemia in cohort studies. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases to identify cohort studies comparing the safety of SGLT-2i versus other glucose-lowering drugs (oGLD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary endpoints were DKA and LLA, while secondary endpoints included UTI, GTI, bone fracture, and hypoglycemia. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: A total of 9,911,454 patients from 40 cohort studies were included in the analysis. SGLT-2i use was associated with a higher risk of DKA (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.38, p = 0.003) and GTI (HR: 2.72, 95% CI: 2.48-2.98, p < 0.01). However, it was not associated with an increased risk of LLA (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.92-1.23, p = 0.42), UTI (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89-1.10, p = 0.83), or bone fracture (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.94-1.04, p = 0.66). Furthermore, SGLT-2i was associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia. Furthermore, compared to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, SGLT-2i as a class and individually was associated with an increased risk of DKA. Canagliflozin specifically increased the risk of LLA (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.36, p = 0.01). The subgroup analysis suggested that SGLT-2i increased the risk of LLA among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: SGLT-2i versus oGLD was associated with a similar occurrence of LLA, UTI, and bone fracture. However, SGLT-2i was associated with a higher risk of DKA and GTI than oGLD. These findings provide valuable information on the safety profile of SGLT-2i in patients with T2DM and can help inform clinical decision-making.

Safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are particularly effective in preventing adverse outcomes of heart failure and chronic kidney disease, which are highly prevalent in the elderly. Here, we aimed to access the safety of SGLT2i in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting safety outcomes of the elderly (≥65 years) patients with type 2 diabetes, randomized to an SGLT2i or placebo. We recorded the incidence of acute kidney injury, volume depletion, genital tract infections, urinary tract infections, bone fractures, amputations, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycaemia and drug discontinuation, by group of treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 130 RCTs screened, only six reported data on elderly patients. In total, 19 986 patients were included. The SGLT2i discontinuation rate was approximately 20%. The risk of acute kidney injury was significantly lower among SGLT2i users compared with placebo [risk ratio (RR) 0.73; 95% CI 0.62-0.87]. SGLT2i were associated with a six-fold increased risk of genital tract infections (RR 6.55; 95% CI 2.09-20.5). The rate of amputations was increased only among canagliflozin users (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.25-3). The risk of fractures, urinary tract infection, volume depletion, hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis was similar between SGLT2i and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2is were well tolerated in the elderly. However, older patients are underrepresented in most RCTs and a call for action is need to favour clinical trials reporting safety outcomes stratified by age.

Impact of estimated plasma volume status on clinical outcomes in patients with lower extremity artery disease who underwent endovascular therapy

Lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is an arterial occlusive disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Estimated plasma volume status (ePVS), a marker of plasma volume expansion and contraction, is gaining attention in the field of cardiovascular diseases. However, the impact of ePVS on the clinical outcomes of patients with LEAD remains unclear. We calculated ePVS using two different formulas, Kaplan-Hakim (KH-ePVS) and Duarte (D-ePVS), in 288 patients (mean age, 73 years; 77% male) with LEAD who underwent the first endovascular therapy (EVT), and prospectively followed them up between 2014 and 2019. All patients were divided into two groups based on the median ePVS values. The primary endpoints were composite events, including all-cause death and major adverse limb events (death/MALE). The median follow-up duration was 672 days. There were 183, 40 and 65 patients in Fontaine classes II, III, and IV, respectively. The median KH-ePVS and D-ePVS was 5.96 and 5.09, respectively. The ePVS significantly increased with advancing Fontaine classes. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the high ePVS group had higher rates of death/MALE than the low ePVS group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that each ePVS was an independent predictor for death/MALE after adjusting for confounding risk factors. The prognostic ability for death/MALE was significantly improved by adding ePVS to the basic predictors. ePVS was associated with LEAD severity and clinical outcomes, suggesting that ePVS could be an additional risk factor for death/MALE in patients with LEAD who underwent EVT. We demonstrated that the association between ePVS and the clinical outcomes of patients with LEAD. The prognostic ability for death/MALE was significantly improved by adding ePVS to the basic predictors. LEAD lower extremity artery disease, MALE major adverse limb events, PVS plasma volume status.

The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations: a nation-wide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have investigated the potential association of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) with an increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLAs), but have produced conflicting results. Particularly studies comparing SGLT2-Is to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) seem to find a higher LLA risk with SGLT2-I use. This raises the question whether the results are driven by a protective GLP1-RA-effect rather than a harmful SGLT2-I-effect. GLP1-RAs could promote wound healing and therefore reduce the risk of LLAs, but the associations between both drug classes and LLA remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the risk of LLA and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) with SGLT2-I use and GLP1-RA use versus sulfonylurea use.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Danish National Health Service (2013-2018). The study population (N = 74,475) consisted of type 2 diabetes patients aged 18 + who received a first ever prescription of an SGLT2-I, GLP1-RA or sulfonylurea. The date of the first prescription defined the start of follow-up. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) of LLA and DFU with current SGLT2-I use and GLP1-RA use versus current SU use. The models were adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic variables, comorbidities and concomitant drug use.

RESULTS

Current SGLT2-I use was not associated with a higher risk of LLA versus sulfonylureas {adjusted HR 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.70]}. Current GLP1-RA use, on the other hand, was associated with a lower risk of LLA [adjusted HR 0.57 (95%CI 0.39-0.84)] compared to sulfonylureas. The risk of DFU was similar to that with sulfonylureas with both exposures of interest.

CONCLUSION

SGLT2-I use was not associated with a higher risk of LLA, but GLP1-RAs with a lower risk of LLA. Previous studies reporting a higher risk of LLA with SGLT2-I use compared to GLP1-RA use might have been looking at a protective GLP1-RA effect, rather than a harmful SGLT2-I effect.

Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients with CKD and Type 2 Diabetes: Population-Based US Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists regarding the safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with CKD treated in routine care. We evaluated the safety of SGLT2i in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes treated in US routine practice.

METHODS

Using claims data from Medicare and two large US commercial databases (April 2013-December 2021), we included 96,128 adults with CKD stages 3-4 and type 2 diabetes who newly filled prescriptions for SGLT2i versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). Safety outcomes included diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), lower limb amputations, nonvertebral fractures, genital infections, hypovolemia, AKI, hypoglycemia, and severe urinary tract infections (UTIs). Hazard ratios (HRs) and incidence rate differences per 1000 person-years were estimated after 1:1 propensity score matching, adjusted for >120 baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared with GLP-1RA, SGLT2i initiators had a higher risk of nonvertebral fractures (HR, 1.30 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03 to 1.65]; incidence rate difference, 2.13 [95% CI, 0.28 to 3.97]), lower limb amputations (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.22 to 2.23]; incidence rate difference, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.00 to 3.92]), and genital infections (HR, 3.08 [95% CI, 2.73 to 3.48]; incidence rate difference, 41.26 [95% CI, 37.06 to 45.46]). Similar risks of DKA (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.74 to 1.54]; incidence rate difference, 0.29 [95% CI, -0.89 to 1.46]), hypovolemia (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.14]; incidence rate difference, 0.20 [95% CI, -2.85 to 3.25]), hypoglycemia (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.26]; incidence rate difference, 1.46 [95% CI, -1.31 to 4.23]), and severe UTI (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.19]; incidence rate difference, 0.35 [95% CI, -2.51 to 3.21]) were observed. SGLT2i had lower risk for AKI (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99]; incidence rate difference, -6.75 [95% CI, -13.69 to 0.20]).

CONCLUSIONS

In US patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes receiving routine care, SGLT2i use was associated with higher risks of genital infections and potentially lower limb amputations and nonvertebral fractures.

Clinical Evaluation of Dapagliflozin in the Management of CKD: Focus on Patient Selection and Clinical Perspectives

Dapagliflozin is a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that was recently approved in the USA and the EU for the treatment of adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without diabetes mellitus (DM). The DAPA-CKD trial showed a 39% decline in the risk of worsening kidney function, onset of end-stage kidney disease, or kidney failure-related death. Patients with lower levels of eGFR and higher levels of albuminuria are among those who stand to gain the greatest absolute benefits. These benefits were similar in both patients with or without diabetes, thus undermining the hypothesis that these drugs mitigate glycemia-related nephrotoxicity. Suggested mechanisms for renal protection include hemodynamic effects; BP reduction and improving salt sensitivities and metabolic effects; and glucose, uric acid and triglycerides (TG)-lowering effects. There have been already many excellent reviews on dapagliflozin and CKD management. Most of them cover both efficacy and safety. This review will focus on clinical perspectives and patient selection for the practicing clinician.

Risk of major adverse limb events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A population-based retrospective cohort study

Background: Both sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have cardiovascular protective effects in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the comparative risk of GLP-1RA versus SGLT-2i for major adverse limb events remains unknown.

Materials and methods: We studied a nationwide cohort involving 123,048 diabetes patients 20–100 years of age who initiated a SGLT-2i or GLP-1RA during 2012 and 2017. The patients in the two groups were matched by propensity score (PS), and incidence rates for hospitalization for major adverse limb events, critical limb ischemia (CLI) and lower extremity amputation (LEA), were assessed. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) between patients receiving SGLT-2i as compared with GLP-1RA. The modification effects of age, a history of established cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease were examined. In addition, use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) was chosen as a second active comparator.

Results: After PS-matching, a total of 13,378 SGLT-2i and 13,378 GLP-1RA initiators were identified. Use of SGLT-2i was not associated with an increased risk for hospitalization for CLI and LEA, either compared with GLP-1RA (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.77–1.65 and 1.27; 95% CI, 0.63–2.55, respectively) or compared with DPP-4i use (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.75–1.50 and HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.42–1.53, respectively). Although the study was underpowered to explore potential effect modification, a trend of higher risks for LEA was noted among SGLT-2i users with cardiovascular disease as compared with either GLP-1RA or DPP-4i.

Conclusion: Use of SGLT-2i was not associated with higher risks for hospitalization for CLI and LEA as compared with reference drugs. Further large-scale studies are needed for a precise risk estimation.

SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure-A Concise Review

The incidence of both diabetes mellitus type 2 and heart failure is rapidly growing, and the diseases often coexist. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a new antidiabetic drug class that mediates epithelial glucose transport at the renal proximal tubules, inhibiting glucose absorption—resulting in glycosuria—and therefore improving glycemic control. Recent trials have proven that SGLT2i also improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes, including reduced cardiovascular mortality and fewer hospitalizations for heart failure. Reduced preload and afterload, improved vascular function, and changes in tissue sodium and calcium handling may also play a role. The expected paradigm shift in treatment strategies was reflected in the most recent 2021 guidelines published by the European Society of Cardiology, recommending dapagliflozin and empagliflozin as first-line treatment for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Moreover, the recent results of the EMPEROR-Preserved trial regarding empagliflozin give us hope that there is finally an effective treatment for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of these new anti-glycemic oral agents in the management of diabetic and heart failure patients.

Effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin in routine care patients: Results from the EMPagliflozin compaRative effectIveness and SafEty (EMPRISE) study

AIM

To investigate effectiveness and safety outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating empagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor treatment across the broad spectrum of cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

In a population-based cohort study we identified 39 072 pairs of 1:1 propensity score-matched adult patients with T2D initiating empagliflozin or DPP-4 inhibitors, using data from 2 US commercial insurance databases and Medicare between August 2014 and September 2017. The primary outcomes were a composite of myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Safety outcomes were bone fractures, lower-limb amputations (LLAs), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and acute kidney injury (AKI). We estimated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for more than 140 baseline covariates.

RESULTS

Study participants had a mean age of 60 years and only 28% had established cardiovascular disease. Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, empagliflozin was associated with similar risk of MI/stroke (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.81-1.21]), and lower risk of HHF (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.35-0.67] and 0.63 [95% CI 0.54-0.74], based on a primary and any heart failure discharge diagnosis, respectively). The HR was 0.52 (95% CI 0.38-0.72) for all-cause mortality (ACM) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.70-0.98) for a composite of MI/stroke/ACM. Empagliflozin was associated with a similar risk of LLA and fractures, an increased risk of DKA (HR 1.71 [95% CI 1.08-2.71]) and a decreased risk of AKI (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.43-0.85]).

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, the initiation of empagliflozin versus a DPP-4 inhibitor was associated with a lower risk of HHF, ACM and MI/stroke/ACM, a similar risk of MI/stroke, and a safety profile consistent with documented information.

Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 on Amputation Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are increasingly utilized in the treatment of diabetes mellitus as well as therapeutic extra-glycemic effects. However, there are still concerns over complications such as amputation events, given the results from the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) trial. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials to investigate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on amputation events.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS) were searched on November 21, 2020, for articles published from January 1, 2000, up to November 21, 2020, for studies that examined the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on amputation events. Random-effect pair-wise meta-analysis for hazard ratios and fixed-effect Peto odds ratio meta-analysis were utilized to summarize the studies.

RESULTS

A total of 15 randomized-controlled trials were included with a combined cohort of 63,716 patients. We demonstrated that there was no significant difference in amputation events across different types of SGLT2 inhibitors, different baseline populations, and different duration of SGLT2 inhibitor use.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, SGLT2 inhibitors were not associated with a significant difference in amputation events.

SGLT2 inhibitors and lower limb complications: an updated meta-analysis

Background

To exam the associations between the use of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and the risk of lower limb complications, and to analyze the associated factors.

Methods

Pubmed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials for Studies and Clinicaltrial.gov were searched from the inception to November 2020. Randomized controlled trials of SGLT2i conducted in population containing diabetic patients with reports of amputation, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diabetic foot (DF) events were included. Random-effect model, fixed-effect model and meta-regression analysis were accordingly used.

Result

The numbers of SGLT2i users versus non-SGLT2i users in the analyses of amputation, PAD and DF were 40,925/33,414, 36,446/28,685 and 31,907/25,570 respectively. Compared with non-SGLT2i users, the risks of amputation and PAD were slightly increased in patients with canagliflozin treatment (amputation: OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.46; PAD: OR = 1.53, 95 % CI 1.14 to 2.05). Meta-regression analyses indicated that greater weight reduction in SGLT2i users was significantly associated with the increased risks of amputation (β = − 0.461, 95% CI − 0.726 to − 0.197), PAD (β = − 0.359, 95% CI − 0.545 to − 0.172) and DF (β = − 0.476, 95% CI − 0.836 to − 0.116). Lower baseline diastolic blood pressure (β = − 0.528, 95% CI − 0.852 to − 0.205), more systolic blood pressure reduction (β = − 0.207, 95% CI − 0.390 to − 0.023) and more diastolic blood pressure reduction (β = − 0.312, 95% CI − 0.610 to − 0.015) were significantly associated with the increased risks of amputation, PAD and DF respectively in patients with SGLT2i treatment.

Conclusions

The risks of amputation and PAD were slightly increased in patients with canagliflozin treatment. Reductions in body weight and blood pressure were associated with lower limb complications in patients with SGLT2i treatment.

A novel data mining application to detect safety signals for newly approved medications in routine care of patients with diabetes

Background

Clinical trials are often underpowered to detect serious but rare adverse events of a new medication. We applied a novel data mining tool to detect potential adverse events of canagliflozin, the first sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 (SGLT2 inhibitor) in the United States, using real‐world data from shortly after its market entry and before public awareness of its potential safety concerns.

Methods

In a U. S. commercial claims dataset (29 March 2013–30 Sept 2015), two pairwise cohorts of patients over 18 years of age with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who were newly dispensed canagliflozin or an active comparator, that is a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4) or a glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP1), were identified and propensity score‐matched. We used variable ratio matching with up to four people receiving a DPP4 or GLP1 for each person receiving canagliflozin. We identified potential safety signals using a hierarchical tree‐based scan statistic data mining method with the hierarchical outcome tree constructed based on international classification of disease coding. We screened for incident adverse events where there were more outcomes observed among canagliflozin vs. comparator initiators than expected by chance, after adjusting for multiple testing.

Results

We identified two pairwise propensity score variable ratio matched cohorts of 44,733 canagliflozin vs. 99,458 DPP4 initiators, and 55,974 canagliflozin vs. 74,727 GLP1 initiators. When we screened inpatient and emergency room diagnoses, diabetic ketoacidosis was the only severe adverse event associated with canagliflozin initiation with p < .05 in both cohorts. When outpatient diagnoses were also considered, signals for female and male genital infections emerged in both cohorts (p < .05).

Conclusions and relevance

In a large population‐based study, we identified known but no other adverse events associated with canagliflozin, providing reassurance on its safety among adult patients with T2D and suggesting the tree‐based scan statistic method is a useful post‐marketing safety monitoring tool for newly approved medications.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Older Adults

OBJECTIVE

Both sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in randomized controlled trials of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) generally <65 years old and mostly with cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of SGLT2i and GLP-1RA among real-world older adults.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using Medicare data (April 2013-December 2016), we identified 90,094 propensity score-matched (1:1) T2D patients ≥66 years old initiating SGLT2i or GLP-1RA. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (i.e., myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Other outcomes included diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), genital infections, fractures, lower-limb amputations (LLA), acute kidney injury (AKI), severe urinary tract infections, and overall mortality. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and rate differences (RDs) per 1,000 person-years, controlling for 140 baseline covariates.

RESULTS

Compared with GLP-1RA, SGLT2i initiators had similar MACE risk (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.87, 1.10]; RD -0.38 [95% CI -2.48, 1.72]) and reduced HHF risk (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.57, 0.80]; RD -3.23 [95% CI -4.68, -1.77]), over a median follow-up of ∼6 months. They also had 0.7 more DKA events (RD 0.72 [95% CI 0.02, 1.41]), 0.9 more LLA (RD 0.90 [95% CI 0.10, 1.70]), 57.1 more genital infections (RD 57.08 [95% CI 53.45, 60.70]), and 7.1 fewer AKI events (RD -7.05 [95% CI -10.27, -3.83]) per 1,000 person-years.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults, those taking SGLT2i had similar MACE risk, decreased HHF risk, and increased risk of DKA, LLA, and genital infections versus those taking GLP-1RA.