Use of antipsychotic drugs and cholinesterase inhibitors and risk of falls and fractures: self-controlled case series

Lithium and the risk of fractures in patients with bipolar disorder: A population-based cohort study

Lithium is considered to be the most effective mood stabilizer for bipolar disorder. Evolving evidence suggested lithium can also regulate bone metabolism which may reduce the risk of fractures. While there are concerns about fractures for antipsychotics and mood stabilizing antiepileptics, very little is known about the overall risk of fractures associated with specific treatments. This study aimed to compare the risk of fractures in patients with bipolar disorder prescribed lithium, antipsychotics or mood stabilizing antiepileptics (valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine). Among 40,697 patients with bipolar disorder from 1993 to 2019 identified from a primary care electronic health record database in the UK, 13,385 were new users of mood stabilizing agents (lithium:2339; non-lithium: 11,046). Lithium was associated with a lower risk of fractures compared with non-lithium treatments (HR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.44-0.98). The results were similar when comparing lithium with prolactin raising and sparing antipsychotics, and individual antiepileptics. Lithium use may lower fracture risk, a benefit that is particularly relevant for patients with serious mental illness who are more prone to falls due to their behaviors. Our findings could help inform better treatment decisions for bipolar disorder, and lithium's potential to prevent fractures should be considered for patients at high risk of fractures.

Relationship between proton pump inhibitor prescription and asthma exacerbation among adult patients: a self-controlled case series study

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are empirically used to treat asthma symptoms such as cough; however, the effectiveness of PPI on asthma exacerbation has not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between PPI use and asthma exacerbation using a large administrative claims database in Japan. We conducted a self-controlled case series using the JMDC Claims Database (JMDC, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The cases included adult patients with asthma who were prescribed PPI and experienced at least one outcome event between January 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the composite outcome of hospital admissions and unscheduled outpatient clinic visits due to asthma exacerbation. We also conducted stratified analyses based on PPI generation, the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), asthma severity, and the number of allergic comorbidities. A total of 7379 eligible patients were included in the study. PPI prescription was associated with a decrease in the composite outcomes (incidence rate ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.93). However, PPI prescriptions did not affect the outcomes of hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.10). Stratified analyses based on PPI generation, the presence of GERD, asthma severity (except for severe asthma), and the number of allergic comorbidities yielded consistent results. PPI use was associated with a moderate decrease in asthma exacerbation, regardless of the patient profile. However, this effect was not as strong as the prevention of hospital admissions, and outcome events were not prevented in patients with severe asthma.

Multiple adverse outcomes associated with antipsychotic use in people with dementia: population based matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate risks of multiple adverse outcomes associated with use of antipsychotics in people with dementia.

DESIGN

Population based matched cohort study.

SETTING

Linked primary care, hospital and mortality data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), England.

POPULATION

Adults (≥50 years) with a diagnosis of dementia between 1 January 1998 and 31 May 2018 (n=173 910, 63.0% women). Each new antipsychotic user (n=35 339, 62.5% women) was matched with up to 15 non-users using incidence density sampling.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcomes were stroke, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, fracture, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury, stratified by periods of antipsychotic use, with absolute risks calculated using cumulative incidence in antipsychotic users versus matched comparators. An unrelated (negative control) outcome of appendicitis and cholecystitis combined was also investigated to detect potential unmeasured confounding.

RESULTS

Compared with non-use, any antipsychotic use was associated with increased risks of all outcomes, except ventricular arrhythmia. Current use (90 days after a prescription) was associated with elevated risks of pneumonia (hazard ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.10 to 2.28), acute kidney injury (1.72, 1.61 to 1.84), venous thromboembolism (1.62, 1.46 to 1.80), stroke (1.61, 1.52 to 1.71), fracture (1.43, 1.35 to 1.52), myocardial infarction (1.28, 1.15 to 1.42), and heart failure (1.27, 1.18 to 1.37). No increased risks were observed for the negative control outcome (appendicitis and cholecystitis). In the 90 days after drug initiation, the cumulative incidence of pneumonia among antipsychotic users was 4.48% (4.26% to 4.71%) versus 1.49% (1.45% to 1.53%) in the matched cohort of non-users (difference 2.99%, 95% CI 2.77% to 3.22%).

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic use compared with non-use in adults with dementia was associated with increased risks of stroke, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, heart failure, fracture, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury, but not ventricular arrhythmia. The range of adverse outcomes was wider than previously highlighted in regulatory alerts, with the highest risks soon after initiation of treatment.

Cholinesterase inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of peptic ulcers: A self-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be used with caution in adults aged 65 years and older. Their gastrointestinal adverse event risk might be further reinforced when using concomitant cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs). We aimed to investigate the association between NSAIDs and ChEI use and the risk of peptic ulcers in adults aged 65 years and older.

METHODS

Register-based self-controlled case series study including adults ≥65 years with a new prescription of ChEIs and NSAIDs, diagnosed with incident peptic ulcer in Sweden, 2007-2020. We identified persons from the Total Population Register individually linked to several nationwide registers. We estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of peptic ulcer with a conditional Poisson regression model for four mutually exclusive risk periods: use of ChEIs, NSAIDs, and the combination of ChEIs and NSAIDs, compared with the non-treatment in the same individual. Risk periods were identified based on the prescribed daily dose, extracted via a text-parsing algorithm, and a 30-day grace period.

RESULTS

Of 70,060 individuals initiating both ChEIs and NSAIDs, we identified 1500 persons with peptic ulcer (median age at peptic ulcer 80 years), of whom 58% were females. Compared with the non-treatment periods, the risk of peptic ulcer substantially increased for the combination of ChEIs and NSAIDs (IRR: 9.0, [6.8-11.8]), more than for NSAIDs alone (5.2, [4.4-6.0]). No increased risks were found for the use of ChEIs alone (1.0, [0.9-1.2]).

DISCUSSION

We found that the risk of peptic ulcer associated with the concomitant use of NSAIDs and ChEIs was over and beyond the risk associated with NSAIDs alone. Our results underscore the importance of carefully considering the risk of peptic ulcers when co-prescribing NSAIDs and ChEIs to adults aged 65 years and older.

Quetiapine Oral Solution in Alzheimer's Disease: Efficacy and Dosage Insights from a Real-World Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are distressing for patients with dementia, often accelerating functional decline and nursing home placement. Medications such as quetiapine are used to alleviate NPS, but their side effects require cautious use. Liquid formulations such as quetiapine oral suspension suit specific populations; however, real-world data on their use in patients with dementia are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective, naturalistic study was to provide preliminary data on the effects of treatment with quetiapine oral suspension on behavioral and psychiatric disturbances in Alzheimer's disease (AD) outpatients in Taiwan.

METHODS

Between January 2022 and June 2023, data were collected from outpatients with a diagnosis of probable AD who received treatment with Qting® (quetiapine oral solution 25 mg/ml). Primary outcome measures were changes in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) total score and its sub-items from baseline to the endpoint.

RESULTS

We recruited 66 AD patients with a mean age of 72.1±7.6 years, most of whom were female (69.7%). Twenty-three patients had data on neuropsychological test and NPI scores before and after quetiapine treatment. There was no significant change in global cognitive function from baseline to the endpoint. A significant reduction in NPI total score after quetiapine treatment was noted, while the effect on NPI sub-items was limited. The average maintenance dose was 1.5±0.6 ml.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated our clinical experience of the use of quetiapine oral solution in AD patients with NPS. Our results showed that quetiapine oral solution treatment significantly improved these symptoms at a relatively low dose.

Baclofen and the risk of fall and fracture in older adults: A real-world cohort study

BACKGROUND

The growth of oral muscle relaxant prescriptions among older adults in the United States is concerning due to the drugs' adverse sedative effects. Baclofen is a gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist muscle relaxant that is associated with encephalopathy. We characterized the risk of fall and fracture associated with oral baclofen against other muscle relaxants (tizanidine or cyclobenzaprine) in older adults.

METHODS

We designed a new-user, active-comparator study using tertiary health system data from Geisinger Health, Pennsylvania (January 2005 through December 2018). Older adults (aged ≥65 years) newly treated with baclofen, tizanidine, or cyclobenzaprine were included. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the treatment groups on 58 baseline characteristics. Fine-Gray competing risk regression was used to estimate the risk of fall and fracture.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised of 2205 new baclofen users, 1103 new tizanidine users, and 9708 new cyclobenzaprine users. During a median follow-up of 100 days, baclofen was associated with a higher risk of fall compared to tizanidine (IPTW incidence rate, 108.4 vs. 61.9 per 1000 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.68 [95% CI, 1.20-2.36]). The risk of fall associated with baclofen was comparable to cyclobenzaprine (SHR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.93-1.47]) with a median follow-up of 106 days. The risk of fracture was similar among patients treated with baclofen versus tizanidine (SHR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.63-1.14]) or cyclobenzaprine (SHR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.67-1.07]).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of fall associated with baclofen was greater than tizanidine, but not compared to cyclobenzaprine in older adults. The risk of fracture was comparable among the older users of baclofen, tizanidine, and cyclobenzaprine. Our findings may inform risk-benefit considerations in the increasingly common clinical encounters where oral muscle relaxants are prescribed.

Cholinesterase inhibitors and falls, syncope and injuries in patients with cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cholinesterase inhibitors are commonly used to treat patients with neurocognitive disorders, who often have an elevated risk of falling. Effective use of these medications requires a thoughtful assessment of risks and benefits.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update on previous reviews and determine the association between cholinesterase inhibitors and falls, syncope, fracture and accidental injuries in patients with neurocognitive disorders.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature and AgeLine were systematically searched through March 2023 to identify all randomised controlled trials of cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine) in patients with cognitive impairment. Corresponding authors were contacted for additional data necessary for meta-analysis. Inclusion criteria consisted of adults ≥19 years, with a diagnosis of dementia, Parkinson's disease, mild cognitive impairment or traumatic brain injury. Data were extracted in duplicate for the aforementioned primary outcomes and all outcomes were analysed using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty three studies (30 donepezil, 14 galantamine, 9 rivastigmine) were included providing data on 25, 399 patients. Cholinesterase inhibitors, compared to placebo, were associated with reduced risk of falls (risk ratio [RR] 0.84 [95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73-0.96, P = 0.009]) and increased risk of syncope (RR 1.50 [95% CI = 1.02-2.21, P = 0.04]). There was no association with accidental injuries or fractures.

CONCLUSION

In patients with neurocognitive disorders, cholinesterase inhibitors were associated with decreased risk of falls, increased risk of syncope and no association with accidental trauma or fractures. These findings will help clinicians better evaluate risks and benefits of cholinesterase inhibitors.

Use of hypnotic-sedative medication and risk of falls and fractures in adults: A self-controlled case series study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of falls and fractures in users of benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, or melatonin.

METHODS

We followed 699,335 adults with a purchase of benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, or melatonin in the Danish National Prescription Registry between 2003 and 2016 for falls and fractures in the Danish National Patient Registry between 2000 and 2018. A self-controlled case-series analysis and conditional Poisson regression were used to derive incidence rate ratios (IRR) of falls and fractures during six predefined periods.

RESULTS

In total 62,105 and 36,808 adults, respectively, experienced a fall or fracture. For older adults, the risk of falls was highest during the 3-month pre-treatment period (IRRmen+70 , 4.22 (95% confidence interval, 3.53-5.05), IRRwomen + 70 , 3.03 (2.59-3.55)) compared to the baseline (>1 year before initiation). The risk continued to be higher in the later treatment periods. Contrarily, in men and women aged 40-69 years, the risk was only higher in the 3-month pre-treatment period. The incidence of falls among young men and women was slightly lower after initiation of sedating medication (treatment period, IRRmen15-39 , 0.66 (0.50-0.86), IRRwomen15-39 , 0.65 (0.51-0.83)). Analyses with fractures as outcome yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although falls and fractures occur more often in persons using sedative-hypnotic medication, the higher risk of falls and fractures in the pre-treatment period relative to the period directly after treatment, suggests that this association is better explained by other factors that elicited the prescription of this medication rather than the adverse effects of the sedative-hypnotic medication.

Comparisons Between Different Anti-osteoporosis Medications on Postfracture Mortality: A Population-Based Study

CONTEXT

Osteoporosis is becoming a global epidemic in aging societies. Anti-osteoporotic medications can prevent fractures, and their pleiotropic effect on mortality is interesting but not well compared among each other.

OBJECTIVE

To provide real-world evidence on the pleiotropic effect of different anti-osteoporotic medications on all-cause mortality, stratified by fracture site, sex, and age.

METHODS

This longitudinal population-based postfracture cohort study, included mega-data from subjects ≥40 years of age with osteoporotic fracture who used anti-osteoporotic medications as recorded in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 2009 to 2017 and followed until 2018. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with immortal time bias was used to assess the relationship between fracture sites and mortality stratified by anti-osteoporosis medication.

RESULTS

A total of 46 729 subjects with an average age of 74.45 years (80.0% female) and a mean follow-up period of 4.73 years were enrolled. In the total fracture group, compared with raloxifene and bazedoxifene, we found that alendronate/risedronate (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88), denosumab (HR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91), and zoledronic acid (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84) resulted in significantly lower mortality. Similar trends were observed in the hip, vertebral, or nonhip/nonvertebral fracture groups. Subjects receiving long-acting zoledronic acid showed the lowest mortality in the subanalysis according to sex or age over 65 years.

CONCLUSION

This real-world mega-data study suggests that the usage of osteoporotic medication, especially a long-acting regimen, may lower postfracture mortality.

Post-discharge use of antipsychotics in patients with hospital-acquired delirium and associated risk of mortality - A population-based nested case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate post-discharge use of antipsychotics in patients with incident hospital-acquired delirium and the associated risk of mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study for patients newly diagnosed with hospital-acquired delirium and subsequently discharged from hospital using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database (NHID) from 2011 to 2018.

RESULTS

The use of antipsychotics after discharge did not increase the risk of mortality (adjusted OR: 1·03; 95% CI: 0·98-1·09).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggested that using antipsychotics after discharge in patients with hospital-acquired delirium may not increase the risk of mortality.

Antidepressant use and risk of self-harm among people aged 40 years or older: A population-based cohort and self-controlled case series study

BACKGROUND

Studies on the association between antidepressants and self-harm in adults were mostly conducted over a decade ago and have inconsistent findings. We aimed to compare self-harm risks by antidepressant classes among people aged 40 years or older with depression.

METHODS

Individuals aged ≥40 years with depression who initiated antidepressant treatment between 2001 and 2015 were retrieved from the Hong Kong Clinical Data Analysis & Reporting system, and were followed up until December 31, 2016. We conducted self-controlled case series (SCCS) analyses to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of self-harm comparing the pre-exposure (90 days before the first antidepressant use), index exposure (the first antidepressant use), and subsequent exposure (subsequent antidepressant use) periods to nonexposed periods. We applied Cox proportional hazard regressions to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of self-harm comparing five antidepressant classes (tricyclic and related antidepressant drugs [TCAs], selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs], noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants [NaSSAs], serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], and others).

FINDINGS

A total of 48,724 individuals were identified. SCCS analyses (N = 3,846) found that the increased self-harm risk occurred during the pre-exposure (IRR: 22.24; 95% CI, 20.25-24.42), index exposure (7.03; 6.34-7.80), and subsequent exposure periods (2.47; 2.18-2.79) compared to the unexposed period. Cohort analyses (N = 48,724) found an association of higher self-harm risks in short-term (one year) for NaSSAs vs. TCAs (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.53-2.96), SNRIs vs. TCAs (1.64; 1.01-2.68), and NaSSAs vs. SSRIs (1.75; 1.29-2.36) in the 40-64 years group. The higher risk remained significant in long-term (> one year) for NaSSAs vs. TCAs (1.55; 1.26-1.91) and NaSSAs vs. SSRIs (1.53; 1.26-1.87). In the 65+ group, only short-term differences were observed (SSRIs vs. TCAs [1.31; 1.03-1.66], SNRIs vs. SSRIs [0.44; 0.22-0.87], and SNRIs vs. NaSSAs [0.43; 0.21-0.87]).

INTERPRETATION

Within-person comparisons did not suggest that antidepressant exposure is causally associated with an increased risk of self-harm in people with depression. Between-person comparisons revealed differences in self-harm risks between certain pairs of antidepressant classes. These findings may inform clinicians' benefit-risk assessments when prescribing antidepressants.

FUNDING

Nil.