1
|
Mianda S, Todowede O, Schneider H. Service delivery interventions to improve maternal and newborn health in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review of quality improvement, implementation research and health system strengthening approaches. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1223. [PMID: 37940974 PMCID: PMC10634015 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10202-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review explores the characteristics of service delivery-related interventions to improve maternal and newborn health (MNH) in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) over the last two decades, comparing three common framings of these interventions, namely, quality improvement (QI), implementation science/research (IS/IR), and health system strengthening (HSS). METHODS The review followed the staged scoping review methodology proposed by Levac et al. (2010). We developed and piloted a systematic search strategy, limited to English language peer-reviewed articles published on LMICs between 2000 and March 2022. Analysis was conducted in two-quantitative and qualitative-phases. In the quantitative phase, we counted the year of publication, country(-ies) of origin, and the presence of the terms 'quality improvement', 'health system strengthening' or 'implementation science'/ 'implementation research' in titles, abstracts and key words. From this analysis, a subset of papers referred to as 'archetypes' (terms appearing in two or more of titles, abstract and key words) was analysed qualitatively, to draw out key concepts/theories and underlying mechanisms of change associated with each approach. RESULTS The searches from different databases resulted in a total of 3,323 hits. After removal of duplicates and screening, a total of 231 relevant articles remained for data extraction. These were distributed across the globe; more than half (n = 134) were published since 2017. Fifty-five (55) articles representing archetypes of the approach (30 QI, 16 IS/IR, 9 HSS) were analysed qualitatively. As anticipated, we identified distinct patterns in each approach. QI archetypes tended towards defined process interventions (most typically, plan-do-study-act cycles); IS/IR archetypes reported a wide variety of interventions, but had in common evaluation methodologies and explanatory theories; and HSS archetypes adopted systemic perspectives. Despite their distinctiveness, there was also overlap and fluidity between approaches, with papers often referencing more than one approach. Recognising the complexity of improving MNH services, there was an increased orientation towards participatory, context-specific designs in all three approaches. CONCLUSIONS Programmes to improve MNH outcomes will benefit from a better appreciation of the distinctiveness and relatedness of different approaches to service delivery strengthening, how these have evolved and how they can be combined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solange Mianda
- School of Public Health & SAMRC Health Services to Systems Research Unit, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Olamide Todowede
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Helen Schneider
- School of Public Health & SAMRC Health Services to Systems Research Unit, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kc A, Waiswa P, Kinney MV. Research on high quality health care needs to move beyond what to how. Lancet Glob Health 2023; 11:e803-e804. [PMID: 37202008 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00209-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Kc
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Peter Waiswa
- School of Public Health and Global Health Division, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mary V Kinney
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kinney MV, George AS, Rhoda NR, Pattinson RC, Bergh AM. From Pre-Implementation to Institutionalization: Lessons From Sustaining a Perinatal Audit Program in South Africa. GLOBAL HEALTH: SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2023; 11:GHSP-D-22-00213. [PMID: 37116922 PMCID: PMC10141437 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR), or related forms of maternal and perinatal death audits, can strengthen health systems. We explore the history of initiating, scaling up, and institutionalizing a national perinatal audit program in South Africa. METHODS Data collection involved 56 individual interviews, a systematic document review, administration of a semistructured questionnaire, and 10 nonparticipant observations of meetings related to the perinatal audit program. Fieldwork and data collection in the subdistricts occurred from September 2019 to March 2020. Data analysis included thematic content analysis and application of a tool to measure subdistrict-level implementation. This study expands on case study research applied to 5 Western Cape subdistricts with long histories of implementation. RESULTS Although established in the early 1990s, the perinatal audit program was not integrated into national policy and guidelines until 2012 but was then excluded from policy in 2021. A network of national and subnational structures that benefited from a continuity of actors evolved and interacted to support uptake and implementation. Intentional efforts to demonstrate impact and enable local adaptation allowed for more ownership and buy-in. Implementation requires continuous efforts. Even in 5 subdistricts with long histories of practice, we found operational gaps, such as incomplete meeting minutes, signaling a need for strengthening. Nevertheless, the tool used to measure implementation may require revisions, particularly in settings with institutionalized practice. CONCLUSION This article provides lessons on how to initiate, expand, and strengthen perinatal audit. Despite a long history of implementation, the perinatal audit program in South Africa cannot be assumed to be indefinitely sustainable or final in its current form. To monitor uptake and sustainability of MPDSR, including perinatal audit, we need research approaches that allow exploration of context, local adaptation, and underlying issues that support sustainability, such as relationships, leadership, and trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary V. Kinney
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
| | - Asha S. George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
| | - Natasha R. Rhoda
- Mowbray Maternity Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Robert C. Pattinson
- Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Anne-Marie Bergh
- Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
How gender is socially constructed in policy making processes: a case study of the Adolescent and Youth Health Policy in South Africa. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:36. [PMID: 36829217 PMCID: PMC9955531 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01819-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gender equality remains an outstanding global priority, more than 25 years after the landmark Beijing Platform for Action. The disconnect between global health policy intentions and implementation is shaped by several conceptual, pragmatic and political factors, both globally and in South Africa. Actor narratives and different framings of gender and gender equality are one part of the contested nature of gender policy processes and their implementation challenges. The main aim of this paper is to foreground the range of policy actors, describe their narratives and different framings of gender, as part exploring the social construction of gender in policy processes, using the Adolescent Youth Health Policy (AYHP) as a case study. METHODS A case study design was undertaken, with conceptual underpinnings combined from gender studies, sociology and health policy analysis. Through purposive sampling, a range of actors were selected, including AYHP authors from government and academia, members of the AYHP Advisory Panel, youth representatives from the National Department of Health Adolescent and Youth Advisory Panel, as well as adolescent and youth health and gender policy actors, in government, academia and civil society. Qualitative data was collected via in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 30 policy actors between 2019 and 2021. Thematic data analysis was used, as well as triangulation across both respondents, and the document analysis of the AYHP. RESULTS Despite gender power relations and more gender-transformative approaches being discussed during the policy making process, these were not reflected in the final policy. Interviews revealed an interrelated constellation of diverse and juxtaposed actor gender narratives, ranging from framing gender as equating girls and women, gender as inclusion, gender as instrumental, gender as women's rights and empowerment and gender as power relations. Some of these narrative framings were dominant in the policy making process and were consequently included in the final policy document, unlike other narratives. The way gender is framed in policy processes is shaped by actor narratives, and these diverse and contested discursive constructions were shaped by the dynamic interactions with the South Africa context, and processes of the Adolescent Youth Health Policy. These varied actor narratives were further contextualised in terms of reflections of what is needed going forward to advance gender equality in adolescent and youth health policy and programming. This includes prioritising gender and intersectionality on the national agenda, implementing more gender-transformative programmes, as well as having the commitments and capabilities to take the work forward. CONCLUSIONS The constellation of actors' gender narratives reveals overlapping and contested framings of gender and what is required to advance gender equality. Understanding actor narratives in policy processes contributes to bridging the disconnect between policy commitments and reality in advancing the gender equality agenda.
Collapse
|
5
|
Odendaal W, Goga A, Chetty T, Schneider H, Pillay Y, Marshall C, Feucht U, Hlongwane T, Kauchali S, Makua M. Early Reflections on Mphatlalatsane, a Maternal and Neonatal Quality Improvement Initiative Implemented During COVID-19 in South Africa. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022; 10:e2200022. [PMID: 36316142 PMCID: PMC9622289 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Despite global progress in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths, much work remains to be done to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Reports indicate that coronavirus disease (COVID-19) disrupts the provision and uptake of routine maternal and neonatal health care (MNH) services and negatively impacts cumulative pre-COVID-19 achievements. We describe a multipartnered MNH quality improvement (QI) initiative called Mphatlalatsane, which was implemented in South Africa before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The initiative aimed to reduce the maternal mortality ratio, neonatal mortality rate, and stillbirth rate by 50% between 2018 and 2022. The multifaceted design comprises QI and other intervention activities across micro-, meso-, and macrolevels, and its area-based approach facilitates patients' access to MNH services. The initiative commenced 6 months pre-COVID-19, with subsequent adaptation necessitated by COVID-19. The initial focus on a plan-do-study-act QI model shifted toward meeting the immediate needs of health care workers (HCWs), the health system, and health care managers arising from COVID-19. Examples include providing emotional support to staff and streamlining supply chain management for infection control and personal protection materials. As these needs were addressed, Mphatlalatsane gradually refocused HCWs' and managers' attention to recognize the disruptions caused by COVID-19 to routine MNH services. This gradual reprioritization included the development of a risk matrix to help staff and managers identify specific risks to service provision and uptake and develop mitigating measures. Through this approach, Mphatlalatsane led to an optimization case using existing resources rather than requesting new resources to build an investment case, with a responsive design and implementation approach as the cornerstone of the initiative. Further, Mphatlalatsane demonstrates that agile and context-specific responses to crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic can mitigate such threats and maintain interventions to improve MNH services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem Odendaal
- HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ameena Goga
- HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Terusha Chetty
- HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Helen Schneider
- School of Public Health and the South African Medical Research Council Health Services to Systems Research Unit, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Yogan Pillay
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | | | - Ute Feucht
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Research Centre for Maternal, Fetal, Newborn and Child Health Care Strategies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tsakane Hlongwane
- Research Centre for Maternal, Fetal, Newborn and Child Health Care Strategies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Shuaib Kauchali
- Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health Institute, Durban, South Africa
| | - Manala Makua
- National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kinney M, Bergh AM, Rhoda N, Pattinson R, George A. Exploring the sustainability of perinatal audit in four district hospitals in the Western Cape, South Africa: a multiple case study approach. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2022-009242. [PMID: 35738843 PMCID: PMC9226866 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) is an intervention process that uses a continuous cycle of identification, notification and review of deaths to determine avoidable causes followed by actions to improve health services and prevent future deaths. This study set out to understand how and why a perinatal audit programme, a form of MPDSR, has sustained practice in South Africa from the perspectives of those engaged in implementation. Methods A multiple case study design was carried out in four rural subdistricts of the Western Cape with over 10 years of implementing the programme. Data were collected from October 2019 to March 2020 through non-participant observation of seven meetings and key informant interviews with 41 purposively selected health providers and managers. Thematic analysis was conducted inductively and deductively adapting the extended normalisation process theory to examine the capability, contribution, potential and capacity of the users to implement MPDSR. Results The perinatal audit programme has sustained practice due to integration of activities into routine tasks (capability), clear value-add (contribution), individual and collective commitment (potential), and an enabling environment to implement (capacity). The complex interplay of actors, their relationships and context revealed the underlying individual-level and organisational-level factors that support sustainability, such as trust, credibility, facilitation and hierarchies. Local adaption and the broad social and structural resources were required for sustainability. Conclusion This study applied theory to explore factors that promote sustained practice of perinatal audit from the perspectives of the users. Efforts to promote and sustain MPDSR will benefit from overall good health governance, specific skill development, embedded activities, and valuing social processes related to implementation. More research using health policy and system approaches, including use of implementation theory, will further advance our understanding on how to support sustained MPDSR practice in other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Kinney
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
| | - Anne-Marie Bergh
- Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Natasha Rhoda
- Department of Neonatology, Mowbray Maternity Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Robert Pattinson
- Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Research Unit, Medical Research Council of South Africa, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Asha George
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Singh NS, Blanchard AK, Blencowe H, Koon AD, Boerma T, Sharma S, Campbell OMR. Zooming in and out: a holistic framework for research on maternal, late foetal and newborn survival and health. Health Policy Plan 2022; 37:565-574. [PMID: 34888635 PMCID: PMC9113153 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czab148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Research is needed to understand why some countries succeed in greater improvements in maternal, late foetal and newborn health (MNH) and reducing mortality than others. Pathways towards these health outcomes operate at many levels, making it difficult to understand which factors contribute most to these health improvements. Conceptual frameworks provide a cognitive means of rendering order to these factors and how they interrelate to positively influence MNH. We developed a conceptual framework by integrating theories and frameworks from different disciplines to encapsulate the range of factors that explain reductions in maternal, late foetal and neonatal mortality and improvements in health. We developed our framework iteratively, combining our interdisciplinary research team's knowledge, experience and review of the literature. We present a framework that includes health policy and system levers (or intentional actions that policy-makers can implement) to improve MNH; service delivery and coverage of interventions across the continuum of care; and epidemiological and behavioural risk factors. The framework also considers the role of context in influencing for whom and where health and non-health efforts have the most impact, to recognize 'the causes of the causes' at play at the individual/household, community, national and transnational levels. Our framework holistically reflects the range of interrelated factors influencing improved MNH and survival. The framework lends itself to studying how different factors work together to influence these outcomes using an array of methods. Such research should inform future efforts to improve MNH and survival in different contexts. By re-orienting research in this way, we hope to equip policy-makers and practitioners alike with the insight necessary to make the world a safer and fairer place for mothers and their babies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha S Singh
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Andrea K Blanchard
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, R070-771 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T6, Canada
| | - Hannah Blencowe
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Adam D Koon
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Ties Boerma
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, R070-771 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T6, Canada
| | - Sudha Sharma
- CIWEC Hospital and Travel Medical Center, G.P.O. Box 12895, Kapurdhara Marg, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
| | - Oona M R Campbell
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lanford D, Petiwala A, Landers G, Minyard K. Aligning healthcare, public health and social services: A scoping review of the role of purpose, governance, finance and data. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:432-447. [PMID: 34018268 PMCID: PMC9291477 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Organisations spanning social services, public health and healthcare have increasingly experimented with collaboration as a tool for improving population health and reducing health disparities. While there has been progress, the results have fallen short of expectations. Reflecting on these shortcomings, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) recently proposed a new framework for cross-sector alignment intended to move the field towards improved outcomes. A central idea in this framework is that collaboratives will be more effective and sustainable if they develop collaborative systems in four core areas: shared purpose, governance, finance and shared data. The goal of this paper is to provide a foundation for research on the four core areas of the cross-sector alignment framework. Accordingly, this study is based on two guiding questions: (1) how are collaboratives currently implementing systems in the four core areas identified in the framework, and (2) what strategies does the literature offer for creating sustainable systems in these four areas? Given the emergent nature of research on health-oriented cross-sector collaboration and the broad research questions, we conducted a systematic scoping review including 179 relevant research papers and reports published internationally from the years 2010-2020. We identified the main contributions and coded each based on its relevance to the cross-sector alignment framework. We found that most papers focused on programme evaluations rather than theory testing, and while many strategies were offered, they tended to reflect a focus on short-term collaboration. The results also demonstrate that starting points and resource levels vary widely across individuals and organisations involved in collaborations. Accordingly, identifying and comparing distinct pathways by which different parties might pursue cross-sector alignment is an imperative for future work. More broadly, the literature is ripe with observations that could be assessed systematically to produce a firm foundation for research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lanford
- Georgia Health Policy CenterAndrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Aliza Petiwala
- Georgia Health Policy CenterAndrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Glenn Landers
- Georgia Health Policy CenterAndrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Karen Minyard
- Georgia Health Policy CenterAndrew Young School of Policy StudiesGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jolivet RR, Gausman J, Adanu R, Bandoh D, Belizan M, Berrueta M, Chakraborty S, Kenu E, Khan N, Odikro M, Pingray V, Ramesh S, Saggurti N, Vázquez P, Langer A. Multisite, mixed methods study to validate 10 maternal health system and policy indicators in Argentina, Ghana and India: a research protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e049685. [PMID: 35039284 PMCID: PMC8765031 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most efforts to assess maternal health indicator validity focus on measures of service coverage. Fewer measures focus on the upstream enabling environment, and such measures are typically not research validated. Thus, methods for validating system and policy-level indicators are not well described. This protocol describes original multicountry research to be conducted in Argentina, Ghana and India, to validate 10 indicators from the monitoring framework for the 'Strategies toward Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality' (EPMM). The overall aim is to improve capacity to drive and track progress towards achieving the priority recommendations in the EPMM strategies. This work is expected to contribute new knowledge on validation methodology and reveal important information about the indicators under study and the phenomena they target for monitoring. Validating the indicators in three diverse settings will explore the external validity of results. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This observational study explores the validity of 10 indicators from the EPMM monitoring framework via seven discrete validation exercises that will use mixed methods: (1) cross-sectional review of policy data, (2) retrospective review of facility-level patient and administrative data and (3) collection of primary quantitative and qualitative cross-sectional data from health service providers and clients. There is a specific methodological approach and analytic plan for each indicator, directed by unique, relevant validation research questions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol was approved by the Office of Human Research Administration at Harvard University in November 2019. Individual study sites received approval via local institutional review boards by January 2020 except La Pampa, Argentina, approved June 2020. Our dissemination plan enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published research, including data sets. We expect to publish at least one peer-reviewed publication per validation exercise. We will disseminate results at conferences and engage local stakeholders in dissemination activities in each study country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Rima Jolivet
- Global Health & Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jewel Gausman
- Women and Health Initiative; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Richard Adanu
- Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana
| | - Delia Bandoh
- Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
| | - Maria Belizan
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mabel Berrueta
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Ernest Kenu
- Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Magdalene Odikro
- Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana, Legon, Greater Accra, Ghana
| | - Veronica Pingray
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Paula Vázquez
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ana Langer
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lattof SR, Maliqi B, Yaqub N, Jung AS. Private sector delivery of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055600. [PMID: 34880027 PMCID: PMC8655548 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent studies have pointed to the substantial role of private health sector delivery of maternal and newborn health (MNH) care in low-/middle-income countries (LMICs). While this role has been partly documented, an evidence synthesis is missing. To analyse opportunities and challenges of private sector delivery of MNH care as they pertain to the new World Health Organization (WHO) strategy on engaging the private health service delivery sector through governance in mixed health systems, a more granular understanding of the private health sector's role and extent in MNH delivery is imperative. We developed a scoping review protocol to map and conceptualise interventions that were explicitly designed and implemented by formal private health sector providers to deliver MNH care in mixed health systems. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol details our intended methodological and analytical approach following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Seven databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Excerpta Medica Database, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing) and two websites will be searched for studies published between 1 January 2002 and 1 June 2021. For inclusion, quantitative and/or qualitative studies in LMICs must report at least one of the following outcomes: maternal morbidity or mortality; newborn morbidity or mortality; experience of care; use of formal private sector care during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum; and stillbirth. Analyses will synthesise the evidence base and gaps on private sector MNH service delivery interventions for each of the six governance behaviours. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be used to develop a menu of private sector interventions for MNH care by governance behaviour. This study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, working groups, webinars and partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha R Lattof
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Blerta Maliqi
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Nuhu Yaqub
- Universal Health Coverage Life Course Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Anne-Sophie Jung
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jolivet RR, Skjefte M, Gausman J, Langer A. The prioritization and development of key social and structural indicators to address gaps in a framework for monitoring the Strategies toward Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality (EPMM): Results of an iterative expert technical consultation. J Glob Health 2021; 11:04057. [PMID: 34737858 PMCID: PMC8542377 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.11.04057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since 2014, iterative technical work has captured stakeholder demand and channeled it toward improving maternal health measurement, to support SDG 3.1. Strategies toward Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality (EPMM) (2015) turned a broad lens on upstream systemic determinants of maternal health and survival highlighted in 11 Key Themes. A monitoring framework was developed to help countries track progress across these domains. This process yielded requests for additional indicators where stakeholders identified gaps for tracking EPMM Key Themes. In response, two technical consultations aimed at affirming the measurement gaps, specifying the constructs for measurement, and fully elaborating the metadata to allow them to be monitored. Methods Measures for development were prioritized based on multi-stakeholder dialogues in five countries, and data collected from government officials and UN partners in twenty countries on perceived need for proposed additional indicators. Sixty-one participants representing expertise in measure development and the topical areas covered took part across both consultations. Measures were developed through two simultaneous participatory online consultations stratified by focus area, comprising videos, discussion forums, polls, and live Zoom meetings. Results Eight candidate indicators relevant to priority recommendations in the EPMM Strategies are presented. Each includes a definition, numerator and denominator (if applicable), method of estimation, disaggregation factors, preferred data source(s), and expected periodicity. Four address gaps in measures of fundamental rights-related determinants of maternal health at national and subnational level, including women's reproductive autonomy; participative accountability for maternal health outcomes; and Respectful Maternity Care. Four strengthen the ability to count, track, and link births and maternal deaths and causes of death. Conclusions The proposed indicators correspond to specific EPMM Key Themes, filling gaps identified by multiple stakeholders, and respond to calls for a broadened approach to measurement and for indicators that track the social and health-systems determinants of maternal health. They reflect inputs and aspirations of numerous stakeholders, gathered over time and across various platforms. The iterative, discursive exploration of the concepts for measurement and the need for metrics to track them responds to recent calls for measure development to be carried out in more inclusive ways, and to be primarily concept- and user-driven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Rima Jolivet
- Improving Maternal Health Measurement Capacity & Use Project; Women & Health Initiative; Department of Global Health & Population; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Malia Skjefte
- Improving Maternal Health Measurement Capacity & Use Project; Women & Health Initiative; Department of Global Health & Population; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jewel Gausman
- Improving Maternal Health Measurement Capacity & Use Project; Women & Health Initiative; Department of Global Health & Population; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ana Langer
- Improving Maternal Health Measurement Capacity & Use Project; Women & Health Initiative; Department of Global Health & Population; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lewin S, Lehmann U, Perry HB. Community health workers at the dawn of a new era: 3. Programme governance. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:129. [PMID: 34641914 PMCID: PMC8506073 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00749-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community health workers (CHWs) can play a critical role in primary healthcare and are seen widely as important to achieving the health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized the key role of CHWs. Improving how CHW programmes are governed is increasingly recognized as important for achieving universal access to healthcare and other health-related goals. This paper, the third in a series on "Community Health Workers at the Dawn of a New Era", aims to raise critical questions that decision-makers need to consider for governing CHW programmes, illustrate the options for governance using examples of national CHW programmes, and set out a research agenda for understanding how CHW programmes are governed and how this can be improved. METHODS We draw from a review of the literature as well as from the knowledge and experience of those involved in the planning and management of CHW programmes. RESULTS Governing comprises the processes and structures through which individuals, groups, programmes, and organizations exercise rights, resolve differences, and express interests. Because CHW programmes are located between the formal health system and communities, and because they involve a wide range of stakeholders, their governance is complex. In addition, these programmes frequently fall outside of the governance structures of the formal health system or are poorly integrated with it, making governing these programmes more challenging. We discuss the following important questions that decision-makers need to consider in relation to governing CHW programmes: (1) How and where within political structures are policies made for CHW programmes? (2) Who implements decisions regarding CHW programmes and at what levels of government? (3) What laws and regulations are needed to support the programme? (4) How should the programme be adapted across different settings or groups within the country or region? CONCLUSION The most appropriate and acceptable models for governing CHW programmes depend on communities, on local health systems, and on the political system in which the programme is located. Stakeholders in each setting need to consider what systems are currently in place and how they might be adapted to local needs and systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lewin
- Division of Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Uta Lehmann
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Henry B Perry
- Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jacobs T, George A, De Jong M. Policy foundations for transformation: a gender analysis of adolescent health policy documents in South Africa. Health Policy Plan 2021; 36:684-694. [PMID: 33852727 PMCID: PMC8248976 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czab041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the United Nations Global Strategy
(2016–30) emphasize that all women, children and adolescents
‘survive, thrive and transform’. A key element of this global
policy framework is that gender equality is a stand-alone goal as well as a
cross-cutting priority. Gender inequality and intersecting social and structural
determinants shape health systems, including the content of policy documents,
with implications for implementation. This article applies a gender lens to
policy documents by national government bodies that have mandates on adolescent
health in South Africa. Data were 15 policy documents, authored between 2003 and
2018, by multiple actors. The content analysis was guided by key lines of
enquiry, and policy documents were classified along the continuum of gender
blind to gender transformative. Only three policy documents defined gender, and
if gender was addressed, it was mostly in gender-sensitive ways, at times gender
specific, but rarely gender transformative. Building on this, a critical
discourse analysis identified what is problematized and what is left
unproblematized by actors, identifying the key interrelated dominant and
marginalized discourses, as well as the ‘silences’ embedded in
policy documents. The discourse analysis revealed that dominant and marginalized
discourses reflect how gender is conceptualized as fixed, categorical
identities, vs as fluid social processes, with implications for how rights and
risks are understood. The discourses substantiate an over-riding focus on
adolescent girls, outside of the context of power relations, with minimal
attention to boys in terms of their own health or through a gender lens, as well
as little consideration of LGBTIQ+ adolescents beyond HIV. Dynamic and
complex relationships exist between the South Africa context, actors, content
and processes, in shaping both how gender is problematized and how
‘solutions’ are represented in these policies. How gender is
conceptualized matters, both for policy analysis and for praxis, and policy
documents can be part of foundations for transforming gender and intersecting
power relations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Jacobs
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Robert Sobukwe Rd, Western Cape 7535, South Africa
| | - Asha George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Robert Sobukwe Rd, Western Cape 7535, South Africa
| | - Michelle De Jong
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Robert Sobukwe Rd, Western Cape 7535, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kinney MV, Walugembe DR, Wanduru P, Waiswa P, George A. Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of implementation factors. Health Policy Plan 2021; 36:955-973. [PMID: 33712840 PMCID: PMC8227470 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czab011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR), or any form of maternal and/or perinatal death review or audit, aims to improve health services and pre-empt future maternal and perinatal deaths. With expansion of MPDSR across low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), we conducted a scoping review to identify and describe implementation factors and their interactions. The review adapted an implementation framework with four domains (intervention, individual, inner and outer settings) and three cross-cutting health systems lenses (service delivery, societal and systems). Literature was sourced from six electronic databases, online searches and key experts. Selection criteria included studies from LMIC published in English from 2004 to July 2018 detailing factors influencing implementation of MPDSR, or any related form of MPDSR. After a systematic screening process, data for identified records were extracted and analysed through content and thematic analysis. Of 1027 studies screened, the review focuses on 58 studies from 24 countries, primarily in Africa, that are mainly qualitative or mixed methods. The literature mostly examines implementation factors related to MPDSR as an intervention, and to its inner and outer setting, with less attention to the individuals involved. From a health systems perspective, almost half the literature focuses on the tangible inputs addressed by the service delivery lens, though these are often measured inadequately or through incomparable ways. Though less studied, the societal and health system factors show that people and their relationships, motivations, implementation climate and ability to communicate influence implementation processes; yet their subjective experiences and relationships are inadequately explored. MPDSR implementation contributes to accountability and benefits from a culture of learning, continuous improvement and accountability, but few have studied the complex interplay and change dynamics involved. Better understanding MPDSR will require more research using health policy and systems approaches, including the use of implementation frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary V Kinney
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
| | - David Roger Walugembe
- School of Health Studies and Faculty of Information and Media Studies, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Phillip Wanduru
- School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Peter Waiswa
- Global Health Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Asha George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
George AS, Jacobs T, Kinney MV, Haakenstad A, Singh NS, Rasanathan K, Chopra M. Are rhetorical commitments to adolescents reflected in planning documents? An exploratory content analysis of adolescent sexual and reproductive health in Global Financing Facility country plans. Reprod Health 2021; 18:124. [PMID: 34134726 PMCID: PMC8210342 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01121-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Global Financing Facility (GFF) offers an opportunity to close the financing gap that holds back gains in women, children's and adolescent health. However, very little work exists examining GFF practice, particularly for adolescent health. As momentum builds for the GFF, we examine initial GFF planning documents to inform future national and multi-lateral efforts to advance adolescent sexual and reproductive health. METHODS We undertook a content analysis of the first 11 GFF Investment Cases and Project Appraisal Documents available on the GFF website. The countries involved include Bangladesh, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Kenya, Liberia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda. RESULTS While several country documents signal understanding and investment in adolescents as a strategic area, this is not consistent across all countries, nor between Investment Cases and Project Appraisal Documents. In both types of documents commitments weaken as one moves from programming content to indicators to investment. Important contributions include how teenage pregnancy is a universal concern, how adolescent and youth friendly health services and school-based programs are supported in several country documents, how gender is noted as a key social determinant critical for mainstreaming across the health system, alongside the importance of multi-sectoral collaboration, and the acknowledgement of adolescent rights. Weaknesses include the lack of comprehensive analysis of adolescent health needs, inconsistent investments in adolescent friendly health services and school based programs, missed opportunities in not supporting multi-component and multi-level initiatives to change gender norms involving adolescent boys in addition to adolescent girls, and neglect of governance approaches to broker effective multi-sectoral collaboration, community engagement and adolescent involvement. CONCLUSION There are important examples of how the GFF supports adolescents and their sexual and reproductive health. However, more can be done. While building on service delivery approaches more consistently, it must also fund initiatives that address the main social and systems drivers of adolescent health. This requires capacity building for the technical aspects of adolescent health, but also engaging politically to ensure that the right actors are convened to prioritize adolescent health in country plans and to ensure accountability in the GFF process itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha S George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Private Bag x17, Cape Town, 7535, South Africa.
| | - Tanya Jacobs
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Private Bag x17, Cape Town, 7535, South Africa
| | - Mary V Kinney
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Private Bag x17, Cape Town, 7535, South Africa
| | - Annie Haakenstad
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Neha S Singh
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Tropical Hygiene and Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | | | - Mickey Chopra
- World Bank, 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Background Disease control involves multiple actions overtime to halt the spread of COVID-19. The role of a country's governance in slowing the spread of COVID-19 has not yet been well investigated. Objective This study aims to investigate the association between governance and the trend of COVID-19 incidence in countries with the highest prevalence. We hypothesized that countries with better governance are more likely to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 than countries with worse governance. Methods We analyzed 62 most prevalent countries with at least 10,000 accumulative confirmed cases from January 22 to June 15, 2020. Countries were further grouped into three different levels of governance (25 better governance, 24 fair governance, and 13 worse governance), identified outbreak and mitigation periods using the joinpoint regression model, and compared the number of days and average daily percent change in incidence in two periods by governance level using the one-way analysis of variance. Findings The average outbreak period in the 62 countries lasted 84.0 days. Sixty percent of countries (N = 37) had experienced outbreak periods, followed by a mitigation period. In contrast, the rest forty percent of countries (N = 25) still had a rising trend. In the outbreak period, better governance countries had a more rapid increase but a shorter outbreak period (71.2 days) than countries with fair (93.5 days) and worse (90.8 days) governance. Most countries with better governance (84.0%) revealed a declining trend in COVID-19 incidence, while such a trend was less than half of fair and worse governance countries (38.5%-41.7%). Conclusions Countries with better governance are more resilient during the COVID-19 crisis. While the mitigation of COVID-19 is observed in most better governance countries, the incidence of COVID-19 is still surging in most fair and worse governance countries, and the possibility of a recurring epidemic of COVID-19 in countries cannot be ignored.
Collapse
|
17
|
Gurung R, Litorp H, Berkelhamer S, Zhou H, Tinkari BS, Paudel P, Malla H, Sharma S, Kc A. The burden of misclassification of antepartum stillbirth in Nepal. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e001936. [PMID: 31908870 PMCID: PMC6936383 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, every year 1.1 million antepartum stillbirths occur with 98% of these deaths taking place in countries where the health system is poor. In this paper we examine the burden of misclassification of antepartum stillbirth in hospitals of Nepal and factors associated with misclassification. Method A prospective observational study was conducted in 12 hospitals of Nepal for a period of 6 months. If fetal heart sounds (FHS) were detected at admission and during the intrapartum period, the antepartum stillbirth (fetal death ≥22 weeks prior labour) recorded in patient's case note was recategorised as misclassified antepartum stillbirth. We further compared sociodemographic, obstetric and neonatal characteristics of misclassified and correctly classified antepartum stillbirths using bivariate and multivariate analysis. Result A total of 41 061 women were enrolled in the study and 39 562 of the participants' FHS were taken at admission. Of the total participants whose FHS were taken at admission, 94.8% had normal FHS, 4.7% had abnormal FHS and 0.6% had no FHS at admission. Of the total 119 recorded antepartum stillbirths, 29 (24.4%) had FHS at admission and during labour and therefore categorised as misclassified antepartum stillbirths. Multivariate analysis performed to adjust the risk of association revealed that complications during pregnancy resulted in a threefold risk of misclassification (adjusted OR-3.35, 95% CI 1.95 to 5.76). Conclusion Almost 25% of the recorded antepartum stillbirths were misclassified. Improving quality of data is crucial to improving accountability and quality of care. As the interventions to reduce antepartum stillbirth differ, accurate measurement of antepartum stillbirth is critical. Trial registration number ISRCTN30829654.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helena Litorp
- Department of Global Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sara Berkelhamer
- Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, United States
| | - Hong Zhou
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Peking University of Health Sciences, Peking, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Ashish Kc
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kinney MV, Walugembe DR, Wanduru P, Waiswa P, George AS. Implementation of maternal and perinatal death reviews: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031328. [PMID: 31780590 PMCID: PMC6886965 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR), or any related form of audit, is a systematic process used to prevent future maternal and perinatal deaths. While the existence of MPDSR policies is routinely measured, measurement and understanding of policy implementation has lagged behind. In this paper, we present a theory-based conceptual framework for understanding MPDSR implementation as well as a scoping review protocol to understand factors influencing MPDSR implementation in low/ middle-income countries (LMIC). METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will inform the development of a theory-based conceptual framework for MPDSR implementation. The methodology for the scoping review will be guided by an adapted Arksey and O'Malley approach. Documents will include published and grey literature sourced from electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, JSTOR, LILACS), the WHO Library, Maternal Death Surveillance and Response Action Network, Google, the reference lists of key studies and key experts. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full studies for inclusion. All discrepancies will be resolved by an independent third party. We will include studies published in English from 2004 to July 2018 that present results on factors influencing implementation of MPDSR, or any related form. Qualitative content and thematic analysis will be applied to extracted data according to the theory-based conceptual framework. Stakeholders will be consulted at various stages of the process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The scoping review will synthesise implementation factors relating to MPDSR in LMIC as described in the literature. This review will contribute to the work of the Countdown to 2030 Drivers Group, which seeks to explore key contextual drivers for equitable and effective coverage of maternal and child health interventions. Ethics approval is not required. The results will be disseminated through various channels, including a peer-reviewed publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary V Kinney
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Bellville, South Africa
| | - David Roger Walugembe
- School of Health Studies, Faculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Phillip Wanduru
- School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Peter Waiswa
- School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
- Division of Global Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Asha S George
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Bellville, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|