1
|
Gass M, Seebauer B, Thommen A, Fischler A, Heinimann K. Genotype-phenotype correlations in carriers of the PMS2 founder variant c.1831dup. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2024; 12:e2360. [PMID: 38284451 PMCID: PMC10797823 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome represents one of the most common cancer predispositions worldwide and is caused by germline pathogenic variants (PV) in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. We repeatedly identified a PV in the MMR gene PMS2, c.1831dup, accounting for 27% of all Swiss PMS2 PV index patients identified. Notably, 2/18 index patients had been diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) before age 30. METHODS In this study, we investigated if this PV could (i) represent a founder variant by haplotype analysis and (ii) be associated with a more severe clinical phenotype. RESULTS Haplotype analysis identified a shared common region of about 0.7 Mb/1.3 cM in 13 (81%) out of 16 index patients. Genotype-phenotype correlations, combining data from the 18 Swiss and 18 literature-derived PMS2 c.1831dup PV index patients and comparing them to 43 Swiss index patients carrying other PMS2 PVs, indicate that the PMS2 c.1831dup variant may be associated with earlier (<50 y) age at CRC diagnosis (55% vs. 29%, respectively; p = 0.047). Notably, 30% (9/30) of cancers from c.1831dup carriers displayed atypical MMR protein expression patterns on immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the PMS2 c.1831dup PV represents a, probably ancient, founder mutation and is possibly associated with an earlier CRC diagnosis compared to other PMS2 PVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Gass
- Institute for Medical Genetics and PathologyUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Britta Seebauer
- Institute for Medical Genetics and PathologyUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Present address:
Genetica AGZurichSwitzerland
| | - Aline Thommen
- Institute for Medical Genetics and PathologyUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Alexandra Fischler
- Institute for Medical Genetics and PathologyUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Karl Heinimann
- Institute for Medical Genetics and PathologyUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
- Research Group Human Genomics, Department of BiomedicineUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bacher JW, Udho EB, Strauss EE, Vyazunova I, Gallinger S, Buchanan DD, Pai RK, Templeton AS, Storts DR, Eshleman JR, Halberg RB. A Highly Sensitive Pan-Cancer Test for Microsatellite Instability. J Mol Diagn 2023; 25:806-826. [PMID: 37544360 PMCID: PMC10629437 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an evolving biomarker for cancer detection and treatment. MSI was first used to identify patients with Lynch syndrome, a hereditary form of colorectal cancer (CRC), but has recently become indispensable in predicting patient response to immunotherapy. To address the need for pan-cancer MSI detection, a new multiplex assay was developed that uses novel long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) markers to improve sensitivity. A total of 469 tumor samples from 20 different cancer types, including 319 from patients with Lynch syndrome, were tested for MSI using the new LMR MSI Analysis System. Results were validated by using deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) status according to immunohistochemistry as the reference standard and compared versus the Promega pentaplex MSI panel. The sensitivity of the LMR panel for detection of dMMR status by immunohistochemistry was 99% for CRC and 96% for non-CRC. The overall percent agreement between the LMR and Promega pentaplex panels was 99% for CRC and 89% for non-CRC tumors. An increased number of unstable markers and the larger size shifts observed in dMMR tumors using the LMR panel increased confidence in MSI determinations. The LMR MSI Analysis System expands the spectrum of cancer types in which MSI can be accurately detected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffery W Bacher
- R&D Clinical Diagnostics, Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
| | - Eshwar B Udho
- R&D Clinical Diagnostics, Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Irina Vyazunova
- R&D Clinical Diagnostics, Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rish K Pai
- Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Douglas R Storts
- R&D Clinical Diagnostics, Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James R Eshleman
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard B Halberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Oncology, McArdle Laboratory of Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grypari IM, Tzelepi V, Gyftopoulos K. DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Precision Oncology. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11418. [PMID: 37511177 PMCID: PMC10380086 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) has a distinct molecular signature, including characteristic chromosomal translocations, gene deletions and defective DNA damage repair mechanisms. One crucial pathway involved is homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and it is found in almost 20% of metastatic castrate-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Inherited/germline mutations are associated with a hereditary predisposition to early PCa development and aggressive behavior. BRCA2, ATM and CHECK2 are the most frequently HRD-mutated genes. BRCA2-mutated tumors have unfavorable clinical and pathological characteristics, such as intraductal carcinoma. PARP inhibitors, due to the induction of synthetic lethality, have been therapeutically approved for mCRPC with HRD alterations. Mutations are detected in metastatic tissue, while a liquid biopsy is utilized during follow-up, recognizing acquired resistance mechanisms. The mismatch repair (MMR) pathway is another DNA repair mechanism implicated in carcinogenesis, although only 5% of metastatic PCa is affected. It is associated with aggressive disease. PD-1 inhibitors have been used in MMR-deficient tumors; thus, the MMR status should be tested in all metastatic PCa cases. A surrogate marker of defective DNA repair mechanisms is the tumor mutational burden. PDL-1 expression and intratumoral lymphocytes have ambivalent predictive value. Few experimental molecules have been so far proposed as potential biomarkers. Future research may further elucidate the role of DNA damage pathways in PCa, revealing new therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna-Maria Grypari
- Cytology Department, Aretaieion University Hospital, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Tzelepi
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
| | - Kostis Gyftopoulos
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Walker R, Mahmood K, Joo JE, Clendenning M, Georgeson P, Como J, Joseland S, Preston SG, Antill Y, Austin R, Boussioutas A, Bowman M, Burke J, Campbell A, Daneshvar S, Edwards E, Gleeson M, Goodwin A, Harris MT, Henderson A, Higgins M, Hopper JL, Hutchinson RA, Ip E, Isbister J, Kasem K, Marfan H, Milnes D, Ng A, Nichols C, O'Connell S, Pachter N, Pope BJ, Poplawski N, Ragunathan A, Smyth C, Spigelman A, Storey K, Susman R, Taylor JA, Warwick L, Wilding M, Williams R, Win AK, Walsh MD, Macrae FA, Jenkins MA, Rosty C, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. A tumor focused approach to resolving the etiology of DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors classified as suspected Lynch syndrome. J Transl Med 2023; 21:282. [PMID: 37101184 PMCID: PMC10134620 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04143-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Routine screening of tumors for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal (CRC), endometrial (EC) and sebaceous skin (SST) tumors leads to a significant proportion of unresolved cases classified as suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS). SLS cases (n = 135) were recruited from Family Cancer Clinics across Australia and New Zealand. Targeted panel sequencing was performed on tumor (n = 137; 80×CRCs, 33×ECs and 24xSSTs) and matched blood-derived DNA to assess for microsatellite instability status, tumor mutation burden, COSMIC tumor mutational signatures and to identify germline and somatic MMR gene variants. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 promoter methylation were repeated. In total, 86.9% of the 137 SLS tumors could be resolved into established subtypes. For 22.6% of these resolved SLS cases, primary MLH1 epimutations (2.2%) as well as previously undetected germline MMR pathogenic variants (1.5%), tumor MLH1 methylation (13.1%) or false positive dMMR IHC (5.8%) results were identified. Double somatic MMR gene mutations were the major cause of dMMR identified across each tumor type (73.9% of resolved cases, 64.2% overall, 70% of CRC, 45.5% of ECs and 70.8% of SSTs). The unresolved SLS tumors (13.1%) comprised tumors with only a single somatic (7.3%) or no somatic (5.8%) MMR gene mutations. A tumor-focused testing approach reclassified 86.9% of SLS into Lynch syndrome, sporadic dMMR or MMR-proficient cases. These findings support the incorporation of tumor sequencing and alternate MLH1 methylation assays into clinical diagnostics to reduce the number of SLS patients and provide more appropriate surveillance and screening recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Walker
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Khalid Mahmood
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Jihoon E Joo
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Peter Georgeson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Julia Como
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Sharelle Joseland
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Susan G Preston
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Yoland Antill
- Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
- Familial Cancer Centre, Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC, 3144, Australia
- Familial Cancer Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Rachel Austin
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia
| | - Alex Boussioutas
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Michelle Bowman
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Jo Burke
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS, 7005, Australia
| | - Ainsley Campbell
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Simin Daneshvar
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Emma Edwards
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | | | - Annabel Goodwin
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Marion T Harris
- Monash Health Familial Cancer Centre, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Alex Henderson
- Genetic Health Service, Wellington, Greater Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
- Wellington Hospital, Newtown, Greater Wellington, 6021, New Zealand
| | - Megan Higgins
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia
- University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4067, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Ryan A Hutchinson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Emilia Ip
- Cancer Genetics Service, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
| | - Joanne Isbister
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Kais Kasem
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Marfan
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia
| | - Di Milnes
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, 4029, Australia
| | - Annabelle Ng
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Cassandra Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, 6008, Australia
| | - Shona O'Connell
- Monash Health Familial Cancer Centre, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, 6008, Australia
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
- School of Medicine, Curtin University, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia
| | - Bernard J Pope
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Nicola Poplawski
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Abiramy Ragunathan
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Courtney Smyth
- Familial Cancer Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Allan Spigelman
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, NSW, 2298, Australia
- St Vincent's Cancer Genetics Unit, Sydney, NSW, 2290, Australia
- Surgical Professorial Unit, UNSW Clinical School of Clinical Medicine, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Kirsty Storey
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Rachel Susman
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia
| | - Jessica A Taylor
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Linda Warwick
- ACT Genetic Service, The Canberra Hospital, Woden, ACT, 2606, Australia
| | - Mathilda Wilding
- Familial Cancer Service, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Rachel Williams
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Aung K Win
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Michael D Walsh
- Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Bowen Hills, QLD, 4006, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walker R, Mahmood K, Joo JE, Clendenning M, Georgeson P, Como J, Joseland S, Preston SG, Antill Y, Austin R, Boussioutas A, Bowman M, Burke J, Campbell A, Daneshvar S, Edwards E, Gleeson M, Goodwin A, Harris MT, Henderson A, Higgins M, Hopper JL, Hutchinson RA, Ip E, Isbister J, Kasem K, Marfan H, Milnes D, Ng A, Nichols C, O’Connell S, Pachter N, Pope BJ, Poplawski N, Ragunathan A, Smyth C, Spigelman A, Storey K, Susman R, Taylor JA, Warwick L, Wilding M, Williams R, Win AK, Walsh MD, Macrae FA, Jenkins MA, Rosty C, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. A tumor focused approach to resolving the etiology of DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors classified as suspected Lynch syndrome. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.02.27.23285541. [PMID: 36909643 PMCID: PMC10002795 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.27.23285541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Routine screening of tumors for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR) in colorectal (CRC), endometrial (EC) and sebaceous skin (SST) tumors leads to a significant proportion of unresolved cases classified as suspected Lynch syndrome (SLS). SLS cases (n=135) were recruited from Family Cancer Clinics across Australia and New Zealand. Targeted panel sequencing was performed on tumor (n=137; 80xCRCs, 33xECs and 24xSSTs) and matched blood-derived DNA to assess for microsatellite instability status, tumor mutation burden, COSMIC tumor mutational signatures and to identify germline and somatic MMR gene variants. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MLH1 promoter methylation were repeated. In total, 86.9% of the 137 SLS tumors could be resolved into established subtypes. For 22.6% of these resolved SLS cases, primary MLH1 epimutations (2.2%) as well as previously undetected germline MMR pathogenic variants (1.5%), tumor MLH1 methylation (13.1%) or false positive dMMR IHC (5.8%) results were identified. Double somatic MMR gene mutations were the major cause of dMMR identified across each tumor type (73.9% of resolved cases, 64.2% overall, 70% of CRC, 45.5% of ECs and 70.8% of SSTs). The unresolved SLS tumors (13.1%) comprised tumors with only a single somatic (7.3%) or no somatic (5.8%) MMR gene mutations. A tumor-focused testing approach reclassified 86.9% of SLS into Lynch syndrome, sporadic dMMR or MMR-proficient cases. These findings support the incorporation of tumor sequencing and alternate MLH1 methylation assays into clinical diagnostics to reduce the number of SLS patients and provide more appropriate surveillance and screening recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Walker
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Khalid Mahmood
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
| | - Jihoon E. Joo
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Peter Georgeson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Julia Como
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Sharelle Joseland
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Susan G. Preston
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Yoland Antill
- Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
- Familial Cancer Centre, Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC 3144, Australia
- Familial Cancer Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Rachel Austin
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Alex Boussioutas
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Michelle Bowman
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Jo Burke
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS 7005 Australia
| | - Ainsley Campbell
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Simin Daneshvar
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Emma Edwards
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | | | - Annabel Goodwin
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Marion T. Harris
- Monash Health Familial Cancer Centre, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Alex Henderson
- Genetic Health Service, Wellington, Greater Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
- Wellington Hospital, Newtown, Greater Wellington 6021, New Zealand
| | - Megan Higgins
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
- University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Ryan A. Hutchinson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Emilia Ip
- Cancer Genetics service, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Joanne Isbister
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Kais Kasem
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Marfan
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Di Milnes
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Annabelle Ng
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Cassandra Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA 6008, Australia
| | - Shona O’Connell
- Monash Health Familial Cancer Centre, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA 6008, Australia
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- School of Medicine, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
| | - Bernard J. Pope
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3051, Australia
| | - Nicola Poplawski
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | | | - Courtney Smyth
- Familial Cancer Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Allan Spigelman
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia
- St Vincent’s Cancer Genetics Unit, Sydney, NSW 2290, Australia
- Surgical Professorial Unit, UNSW Clinical School of Clinical Medicine, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Kirsty Storey
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Rachel Susman
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Jessica A. Taylor
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Linda Warwick
- ACT Genetic Service, The Canberra Hospital, Woden, ACT 2606, Australia
| | - Mathilda Wilding
- Familial Cancer Service, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Rachel Williams
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Aung K. Win
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Michael D. Walsh
- Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Bowen Hills, QLD 4006, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Finlay A. Macrae
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark A. Jenkins
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Ingrid M. Winship
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3000, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abildgaard AB, Nielsen SV, Bernstein I, Stein A, Lindorff-Larsen K, Hartmann-Petersen R. Lynch syndrome, molecular mechanisms and variant classification. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:726-734. [PMID: 36434153 PMCID: PMC9978028 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02059-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with the heritable cancer disease, Lynch syndrome, carry germline variants in the MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 genes, encoding the central components of the DNA mismatch repair system. Loss-of-function variants disrupt the DNA mismatch repair system and give rise to a detrimental increase in the cellular mutational burden and cancer development. The treatment prospects for Lynch syndrome rely heavily on early diagnosis; however, accurate diagnosis is inextricably linked to correct clinical interpretation of individual variants. Protein variant classification traditionally relies on cumulative information from occurrence in patients, as well as experimental testing of the individual variants. The complexity of variant classification is due to (1) that variants of unknown significance are rare in the population and phenotypic information on the specific variants is missing, and (2) that individual variant testing is challenging, costly and slow. Here, we summarise recent developments in high-throughput technologies and computational prediction tools for the assessment of variants of unknown significance in Lynch syndrome. These approaches may vastly increase the number of interpretable variants and could also provide important mechanistic insights into the disease. These insights may in turn pave the road towards developing personalised treatment approaches for Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda B Abildgaard
- The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sofie V Nielsen
- The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Inge Bernstein
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Amelie Stein
- The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
- The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Rasmus Hartmann-Petersen
- The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walker R, Georgeson P, Mahmood K, Joo JE, Makalic E, Clendenning M, Como J, Preston S, Joseland S, Pope BJ, Hutchinson RA, Kasem K, Walsh MD, Macrae FA, Win AK, Hopper JL, Mouradov D, Gibbs P, Sieber OM, O'Sullivan DE, Brenner DR, Gallinger S, Jenkins MA, Rosty C, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. Evaluating Multiple Next-Generation Sequencing-Derived Tumor Features to Accurately Predict DNA Mismatch Repair Status. J Mol Diagn 2023; 25:94-109. [PMID: 36396080 PMCID: PMC10424255 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying tumor DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is important for precision medicine. Tumor features, individually and in combination, derived from whole-exome sequenced (WES) colorectal cancers (CRCs) and panel-sequenced CRCs, endometrial cancers (ECs), and sebaceous skin tumors (SSTs) were assessed for their accuracy in detecting dMMR. CRCs (n = 300) with WES, where mismatch repair status was determined by immunohistochemistry, were assessed for microsatellite instability (MSMuTect, MANTIS, MSIseq, and MSISensor), Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer tumor mutational signatures, and somatic mutation counts. A 10-fold cross-validation approach (100 repeats) evaluated the dMMR prediction accuracy for i) individual features, ii) Lasso statistical model, and iii) an additive feature combination approach. Panel-sequenced tumors (29 CRCs, 22 ECs, and 20 SSTs) were assessed for the top performing dMMR predicting features/models using these three approaches. For WES CRCs, 10 features provided >80% dMMR prediction accuracy, with MSMuTect, MSIseq, and MANTIS achieving ≥99% accuracy. The Lasso model achieved 98.3% accuracy. The additive feature approach, with three or more of six of MSMuTect, MANTIS, MSIseq, MSISensor, insertion-deletion count, or tumor mutational signature small insertion/deletion 2 + small insertion/deletion 7 achieved 99.7% accuracy. For the panel-sequenced tumors, the additive feature combination approach of three or more of six achieved accuracies of 100%, 95.5%, and 100% for CRCs, ECs, and SSTs, respectively. The microsatellite instability calling tools performed well in WES CRCs; however, an approach combining tumor features may improve dMMR prediction in both WES and panel-sequenced data across tissue types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Walker
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Georgeson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Khalid Mahmood
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jihoon E Joo
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julia Como
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Preston
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharelle Joseland
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bernard J Pope
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ryan A Hutchinson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kais Kasem
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael D Walsh
- Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Bowen Hills, Queensland, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aung K Win
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dmitri Mouradov
- Personalized Oncology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medial Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalized Oncology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medial Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Oliver M Sieber
- Personalized Oncology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medial Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dylan E O'Sullivan
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Darren R Brenner
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Genomic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Quintanilha JCF, Graf RP, Fisher VA, Oxnard GR, Ellis H, Panarelli N, Lin DI, Li G, Huang RSP, Ross JS, Myer PA, Klempner SJ. Comparative Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors vs Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Measures of Microsatellite Instability, Mismatch Repair, or Tumor Mutational Burden. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2252244. [PMID: 36689222 PMCID: PMC9871803 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance The KEYNOTE-177 trial demonstrated that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficiency (DMMR) have better outcomes when receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared with chemotherapy. Data on performance of ICIs in patients with MCRC in standard practice settings remain limited, and direct MMR vs MSI outcome association comparisons are lacking. Objective To validate MSI (determined by next-generation sequencing [NGS]) as a biomarker of ICI effectiveness among patients with MCRC in standard practice settings and examine the association of MSI assessed by NGS, DMMR by immunohistochemistry, and tumor mutational burden (cutoff, 10 mutations/megabase) with ICI outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This comparative effectiveness research study of outcomes in prospectively defined biomarker subgroups used data from a deidentified clinicogenomic database and included patients who received Foundation Medicine testing (FoundationOne or FoundationOne CDx) during routine clinical care at approximately 280 US academic or community-based cancer clinics between March 2014 and December 2021. The population included 1 cohort of patients with MSI-H MCRC who received first-line ICIs or chemotherapy and a second cohort who received ICIs in any line of therapy (LOT) for biomarker examination. Exposures ICI therapy or chemotherapy assigned at physician discretion without randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcomes were time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios were adjusted for known prognostic imbalances. Comparisons of explanatory power used the likelihood ratio test. Results A total of 138 patients (median age, 67.0 years [IQR, 56.2-74.0 years]; 73 [52.9%] female) with MSI-H MCRC received first-line ICIs or chemotherapy. A total of 182 patients (median age, 64.5 years [IQR, 55.2-72.0]; 98 [53.8%] female) received ICIs in any LOT. Patients receiving first-line ICIs vs chemotherapy had longer TTNT (median, not reached [NR] vs 7.23 months [IQR, 6.21-9.72 months]; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.08-0.35; P < .001), PFS (median, 24.87 months [IQR, 19.10 months to NR] vs 5.65 months [IQR, 4.70-8.34 months]; AHR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18-0.52; P < .001), and OS (median, NR vs 24.1 months [IQR, 13.90 months to NR]; HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.88; P = .02). MSI added to DMMR better anticipated TTNT and PFS in patients receiving ICIs than DMMR alone. The same was not observed when DMMR evaluation was added to MSI. Conclusions and Relevance In this comparative effectiveness research study, MSI assessed by NGS robustly identified patients with favorable outcomes on first-line ICIs vs chemotherapy and appeared to better anticipate ICI outcomes compared with DMMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Haley Ellis
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Nicole Panarelli
- Medicine/Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Gerald Li
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jeffrey S. Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Parvathi A. Myer
- Medicine/Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samuel J. Klempner
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mounai Y, Yoshida T, Ito S, Fukuda K, Shimazu K, Taguchi D, Shinozaki H, Takagi D, Imai K, Yamamoto H, Minamiya Y, Nanjyo H, Shibata H. Pulmonary Artery Intimal Sarcoma in a Patient with Lynch Syndrome: Response to an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor. Case Rep Oncol 2023; 16:21-29. [PMID: 36743879 PMCID: PMC9891846 DOI: 10.1159/000528682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Intimal sarcoma is an extremely rare mesenchymal tumor arising in the great vessels. To date, intimal sarcoma has not been reported in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS), even though this syndrome lacks DNA mismatch repair ability genetically and is prone to various malignancies. This patient was diagnosed with LS by the Revised Amsterdam Criteria II, and she suffered from intimal sarcoma in the left pulmonary artery. She had a germline missense variant of PMS2 (c.1399G>A, pV467I) which is classified as a variant of unknown significance. In her intimal sarcoma, PMS2 expression was decreased. Additionally, it exhibited microsatellite instability and a high tumor mutational burden (69 mutations/Mb) which are features of mismatch repair deficiency, although PMS2 (c.1399G>A, pV467I) missense is a variant of unknown significance. The metastatic lesions of intimal sarcoma in this patient responded heterogeneously to pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Cytotoxic agents and radiation were also effective for some metastatic lesions, but some lesions, including her liver metastases, were resistant. The hypermutable nature of the LS genotype might acquire resistance to an immune checkpoint inhibitor and other cytotoxic agents such as occurred with her liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Mounai
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Taichi Yoshida
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Shogo Ito
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Koji Fukuda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Shimazu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Daiki Taguchi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Hanae Shinozaki
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Daichi Takagi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Imai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yamamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Minamiya
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nanjyo
- Department of Pathology, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Shibata
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, Akita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bartley AN, Mills AM, Konnick E, Overman M, Ventura CB, Souter L, Colasacco C, Stadler ZK, Kerr S, Howitt BE, Hampel H, Adams SF, Johnson W, Magi-Galluzzi C, Sepulveda AR, Broaddus RR. Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability Testing for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the Association for Molecular Pathology and Fight Colorectal Cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; 146:1194-1210. [PMID: 35920830 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0632-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with advanced solid tumors that have DNA mismatch repair defects or high levels of microsatellite instability; however, the FDA provided no guidance on which specific clinical assays should be used to determine mismatch repair status. OBJECTIVE.— To develop an evidence-based guideline to identify the optimal clinical laboratory test to identify defects in DNA mismatch repair in patients with solid tumor malignancies who are being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. DESIGN.— The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. Using the National Academy of Medicine-endorsed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the recommendations were derived from available evidence, strength of that evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability derived from both polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing, and tumor mutation burden derived from large panel next-generation sequencing were within scope. RESULTS.— Six recommendations and 3 good practice statements were developed. More evidence and evidence of higher quality were identified for colorectal cancer and other cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract than for cancers arising outside the GI tract. CONCLUSIONS.— An optimal assay depends on cancer type. For most cancer types outside of the GI tract and the endometrium, there was insufficient published evidence to recommend a specific clinical assay. Absent published evidence, immunohistochemistry is an acceptable approach readily available in most clinical laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela N Bartley
- From the Department of Pathology, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan (Bartley)
| | - Anne M Mills
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Mills)
| | - Eric Konnick
- From the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle (Konnick)
| | - Michael Overman
- From the Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Overman)
| | - Christina B Ventura
- From Surveys, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Ventura, Colasacco)
| | - Lesley Souter
- From Methodology Consultant, Smithville, Ontario, Canada (Souter)
| | - Carol Colasacco
- From Surveys, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Ventura, Colasacco)
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- From the Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Stadler)
| | - Sarah Kerr
- From Hospital Pathology Associates, PA, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Kerr)
| | - Brooke E Howitt
- From the Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (Howitt)
| | - Heather Hampel
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Hampel)
| | - Sarah F Adams
- From the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (Adams)
| | - Wenora Johnson
- From Fight Colorectal Cancer, Springfield, Missouri (Johnson)
| | - Cristina Magi-Galluzzi
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (Magi-Galluzzi)
| | - Antonia R Sepulveda
- From the Department of Pathology, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia (Sepulveda)
| | - Russell R Broaddus
- From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (Broaddus)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dixon K, Asrat MJ, Bedard AC, Binnington K, Compton K, Cremin C, Heidary N, Lohn Z, Lovick N, McCullum M, Mindlin A, O'Loughlin M, Petersen T, Portigal-Todd C, Scott J, St-Martin G, Thompson J, Turnbull R, Mung SW, Hong Q, Bezeau M, Bosdet I, Tucker T, Young S, Yip S, Aubertin G, Blood KA, Nuk J, Sun S, Schrader KA. Integrating Tumor Sequencing Into Clinical Practice for Patients With Mismatch Repair-Deficient Lynch Syndrome Spectrum Cancers. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021; 12:e00397. [PMID: 34397043 PMCID: PMC8373535 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Uninformative germline genetic testing presents a challenge to clinical management for patients suspected to have Lynch syndrome, a cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes or EPCAM. METHODS Among a consecutive series of MMR-deficient Lynch syndrome spectrum cancers identified through immunohistochemistry-based tumor screening, we investigated the clinical utility of tumor sequencing for the molecular diagnosis and management of suspected Lynch syndrome families. MLH1-deficient colorectal cancers were prescreened for BRAF V600E before referral for genetic counseling. Microsatellite instability, MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, and somatic and germline genetic variants in the MMR genes were assessed according to an established clinical protocol. RESULTS Eighty-four individuals with primarily colorectal (62%) and endometrial (31%) cancers received tumor-normal sequencing as part of routine clinical genetic assessment. Overall, 27% received a molecular diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. Most of the MLH1-deficient tumors were more likely of sporadic origin, mediated by MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in 54% and double somatic genetic alterations in MLH1 (17%). MSH2-deficient, MSH6-deficient, and/or PMS2-deficient tumors could be attributed to pathogenic germline variants in 37% and double somatic events in 28%. Notably, tumor sequencing could explain 49% of cases without causal germline variants, somatic MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, or somatic variants in BRAF. DISCUSSION Our findings support the integration of tumor sequencing into current Lynch syndrome screening programs to improve clinical management for individuals whose germline testing is uninformative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Dixon
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Mary-Jill Asrat
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Angela C. Bedard
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Kristin Binnington
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Katie Compton
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Carol Cremin
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Nili Heidary
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Zoe Lohn
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Niki Lovick
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Mary McCullum
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Allison Mindlin
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Melanie O'Loughlin
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Tammy Petersen
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | | | - Jenna Scott
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | | | - Jennifer Thompson
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Ruth Turnbull
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Sze Wing Mung
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Quan Hong
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Marjorie Bezeau
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Laboratory of Transdisciplinary Research in Genetics, Medicines and Social Sciences, Sherbrooke's University Hospital Center of Clinical Research, Quebec, Canada;
| | - Ian Bosdet
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Tracy Tucker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Sean Young
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Stephen Yip
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Gudrun Aubertin
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Department of Medical Genetics, Vancouver Island Health Authority, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Katherine A. Blood
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Department of Medical Genetics, Vancouver Island Health Authority, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Jennifer Nuk
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
| | - Sophie Sun
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Kasmintan A. Schrader
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang YJ, Yang Y, Wei Q, Xu T, Zhang XT, Gao J, Tan SY, Liu BR, Zhang JD, Chen XB, Wang ZJ, Qiu M, Wang X, Shen L, Wang XC. A multicenter study assessing the prevalence of germline genetic alterations in Chinese gastric-cancer patients. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2021; 9:339-349. [PMID: 34567566 PMCID: PMC8460096 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 10% of patients with gastric cancer (GC) have a genetic predisposition toward the disease. However, there is scant knowledge regarding germline mutations in predisposing genes in the Chinese GC population. This study aimed to determine the spectrum and distribution of predisposing gene mutations among Chinese GC patients known to have hereditary high-risk factors for cancer. METHODS A total of 40 GC patients from 40 families were recruited from seven medical institutions in China. Next-generation sequencing was performed on 171 genes associated with cancer predisposition. For probands carrying pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants, Sanger sequencing was applied to validate the variants in the probands as well as their relatives. RESULTS According to sequencing results, 25.0% (10/40) of the patients carried a combined total of 10 pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants involving nine different genes: CDH1 (n = 1), MLH1 (n = 1), MSH2 (n = 1), CHEK2 (n = 1), BLM (n = 1), EXT2 (n = 1), PALB2 (n = 1), ERCC2 (n = 1), and SPINK1 (n = 2). In addition, 129 variants of uncertain significance were identified in 27 patients. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that approximately one in every four Chinese GC patients with hereditary high risk factors may harbor pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline alterations in cancer-susceptibility genes. The results further indicate a unique genetic background for GC among Chinese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin-Jie Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Yang Yang
- Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Qing Wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Ting Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Tian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Jing Gao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Si-Yi Tan
- Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Bao-Rui Liu
- Comprehensive Cancer Center of Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University & Clinical Cancer Institute of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, P. R. China
| | - Jing-Dong Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Bing Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Medical Oncology, Henan Cancer Hospital (Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University), Zhengzhou, Henan, P. R. China
| | - Zhao-Jie Wang
- Department of Oncology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, P. R. China
| | - Meng Qiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P. R. China
| | - Xin Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Disease, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, P. R. China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Xi-Cheng Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Uehara DT, Mitsubuchi H, Inazawa J. A missense variant in NUF2, a component of the kinetochore NDC80 complex, causes impaired chromosome segregation and aneuploidy associated with microcephaly and short stature. Hum Genet 2021; 140:1047-1060. [PMID: 33721060 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02273-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Mutations in proteins involved in cell division and chromosome segregation, such as microtubule-regulating, centrosomal and kinetochore proteins, are associated with microcephaly and/or short stature. In particular, the kinetochore plays an essential role in mitosis and cell division by mediating connections between chromosomal DNA and spindle microtubules. To date, only a few genes encoding proteins of the kinetochore complex have been identified as causes of syndromes that include microcephaly. We report a male patient with a rare de novo missense variant in NUF2, after trio whole-exome sequencing analysis. The patient presented with microcephaly and short stature, with additional features, such as bilateral vocal cord paralysis, micrognathia and atrial septal defect. NUF2 encodes a subunit of the NDC80 complex in the outer kinetochore, important for correct microtubule binding and spindle assembly checkpoint. The mutated residue is buried at the calponin homology (CH) domain at the N-terminus of NUF2, which interacts with the N-terminus of NDC80. The variant caused the loss of hydrophobic interactions in the core of the CH domain of NUF2, thereby impairing the stability of NDC80-NUF2. Analysis using a patient-derived lymphoblastoid cell line revealed markedly reduced protein levels of both NUF2 and NDC80, aneuploidy, increased micronuclei formation and spindle abnormality. Our findings suggest that NUF2 may be the first member of the NDC80 complex to be associated with a human disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Tiaki Uehara
- Department of Molecular Cytogenetics, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Mitsubuchi
- Department of Neonatology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Johji Inazawa
- Department of Molecular Cytogenetics, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
- Bioresource Research Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Unexpected expression of mismatch repair protein is more commonly seen with pathogenic missense than with other mutations in Lynch syndrome. Hum Pathol 2020; 103:34-41. [PMID: 32652087 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
It has been observed that some patients with colorectal cancer due to germline or double somatic pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes may have intact protein expression in their tumors as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). This has been speculated to occur more frequently in Lynch syndrome (LS) cases due to pathogenic missense mutations, leading to expression of a full-length but nonfunctional protein with retained antigenicity. Our goals were to study the frequency of unexpected MMR expression in colorectal cancers among LS cases with missense mutations, LS cases with truncating mutations, as well as cases with double somatic MMR mutations and evaluate if the unexpected MMR expression is more common in certain categories. IHC slides were available for 82 patients with MMR deficiency without methylation, which included 56 LS cases and 26 double somatic MMR mutation cases. Sixteen of 82 MMR-defective cases showed unexpected MMR expression, with 10 cases showing tumor staining weaker than the control and 6 cases (7%) showing intact staining. Unexpected MMR expression was most commonly seen with LS cases with missense mutations (4 of 9, 44%), followed by MMR double somatic mutation cases (7 of 26, 27%), and finally by LS cases with truncating mutations (5 of 47, 11%). Cautious interpretation of MMR IHC is advised when dealing with tumor staining that is weaker than the control regardless of the percentage of tumor staining as these cases may harbor pathogenic MMR gene mutations. Missense mutations may account for some LS cases that may be missed by IHC alone. Strict adherence to proper interpretation of IHC with attention to staining intensity and the status of heterodimer partner protein will prevent many potential misses.
Collapse
|
15
|
Klančar G, Blatnik A, Šetrajčič Dragoš V, Vogrič V, Stegel V, Blatnik O, Drev P, Gazič B, Krajc M, Novaković S. A Novel Germline MLH1 In-Frame Deletion in a Slovenian Lynch Syndrome Family Associated with Uncommon Isolated PMS2 Loss in Tumor Tissue. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11030325. [PMID: 32197529 PMCID: PMC7140785 DOI: 10.3390/genes11030325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The diagnostics of Lynch syndrome (LS) is focused on the detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system deficiency. MMR deficiency can be detected on tumor tissue by microsatellite instability (MSI) using molecular genetic test or by loss of expression of one of the four proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) involved in the MMR system using immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, definitive diagnosis of LS requires the identification of the germline pathogenic variant in one of the MMR genes. In the report, we are presenting interesting novel MLH1 in-frame deletion LRG_216t1:c.2236_2247delCTGCCTGATCTA p.(Leu746_Leu749del) associated with LS. The variant appears to be associated with uncommon isolated loss of PMS2 immunohistochemistry protein staining (expression) in tumor tissue instead of MLH1 and PMS2 protein loss, which is commonly seen with pathogenic variants in MLH1. The variant was classified as likely pathogenic, based on segregation analysis and molecular characterization of blood and tumor samples. According to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines, the following evidence categories of PM1, PM2, PM4, and PP1 moderate have been used for classification of the novel variant. By detecting and classifying the novel MLH1 variant as likely pathogenic, we confirmed the LS in this family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gašper Klančar
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (G.K.); (V.Š.D.); (V.V.); (V.S.)
| | - Ana Blatnik
- Cancer Genetics Clinic, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (A.B.); (M.K.)
| | - Vita Šetrajčič Dragoš
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (G.K.); (V.Š.D.); (V.V.); (V.S.)
| | - Vesna Vogrič
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (G.K.); (V.Š.D.); (V.V.); (V.S.)
| | - Vida Stegel
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (G.K.); (V.Š.D.); (V.V.); (V.S.)
| | - Olga Blatnik
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (O.B.); (P.D.); (B.G.)
| | - Primož Drev
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (O.B.); (P.D.); (B.G.)
| | - Barbara Gazič
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (O.B.); (P.D.); (B.G.)
| | - Mateja Krajc
- Cancer Genetics Clinic, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (A.B.); (M.K.)
| | - Srdjan Novaković
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (G.K.); (V.Š.D.); (V.V.); (V.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +386-1-587-95-46; Fax: +386-1-587-94-10
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Serra S, Capo-Chichi JM, McCarthy AJ, Sabatini P, Chetty R. Unique MLH1 mutations in colonic adenomas in an obligate germline Lynch syndrome carrier. J Clin Pathol 2019; 73:291-295. [PMID: 31649038 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An obligate germline Lynch syndrome carrier had four colonic adenomas removed. MATERIALS AND METHODS The adenomas were evaluated for grade of dysplasia, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 protein expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), BRAF, methylation status and a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 52 cancer genes. RESULTS There were four tubular or tubulovillous adenomas from the hepatic flexure, rectosigmoid and rectum; one with low-grade and high-grade dysplasia, one with high-grade dysplasia only and two with low-grade dysplasia. All four adenomas showed retention of MLH1, MHS2 and MSH6 but complete loss of PMS2 in both low-grade and high-grade dysplasia areas.Two of the four adenomas were MSI-high, BRAF V600E wild type and were not MLH1 methylated. NGS identified an MLH1 germline variant: NM_000249.3: c.1558+1 G>A, p.(?) in all tissue (adenomas and normal), which likely explains the pathophysiology of Lynch syndrome in this patient. Other variants were also detected in MLH1 and MSH6 in all four adenomas tested; these being reported previously in somatic colorectal cancers. CONCLUSION We highlight an MLH1 variant in the colonic adenomas in an obligate Lynch syndrome carrier that resulted in PMS2 protein loss in the absence of mutations of the PMS2 gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Serra
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Divisions of Anatomical Pathology, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Aoife J McCarthy
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Divisions of Anatomical Pathology, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Sabatini
- Clinical Laboratory Genetics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Runjan Chetty
- Laboratory Medicine Program, Divisions of Anatomical Pathology, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Kobayashi M, Inaguma S, Raffeld M, Kato H, Suzuki S, Wakasugi T, Mitsui A, Kuwabara Y, Lasota J, Ikeda H, Miettinen M, Takahashi S. Epithelioid variant of gastrointestinal stromal tumor harboring PDGFRA mutation and MLH1 gene alteration: A case report. Pathol Int 2019; 69:541-546. [PMID: 31273885 DOI: 10.1111/pin.12830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most important and common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, especially in the stomach. GISTs are usually driven by activating mutations in either KIT or PDGFRA genes. It is known that activating gene mutations predicts, to a certain extent, not only the morphology of the tumor cells but also a response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here, we present a case of an epithelioid variant of GIST harboring PDGFRA and MLH1 gene alterations in the stomach of a 55-year-old Japanese woman. The tumor of 98 mm with multiple cysts showed exophytic growth from the gastric fundus. Histopathologically, it consisted of scattered medium-sized epithelioid tumor cells in a loose myxoid background. Based on c-kit and DOG-1 immunoreactivity and a PDGFRA mutation (p.Trp559_Arg560del), the tumor was diagnosed as an epithelioid variant GIST. Interestingly, it had a gene alteration (p.Met524Ile) in the MLH1 gene of unknown pathogenicity. It was assigned to Group 3a (low risk for malignant behavior). After surgery, the patient has been on imatinib therapy and disease-free for 10 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizuho Kobayashi
- Department of Pathology, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Experimental Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shingo Inaguma
- Department of Pathology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Mark Raffeld
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Kato
- Department of Experimental Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shugo Suzuki
- Department of Experimental Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takehiro Wakasugi
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Akira Mitsui
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kuwabara
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Jerzy Lasota
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - Hiroshi Ikeda
- Department of Pathology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Markku Miettinen
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Department of Experimental Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
D'Arcy BM, Blount J, Prakash A. Biochemical and structural characterization of two variants of uncertain significance in the PMS2 gene. Hum Mutat 2019; 40:458-471. [PMID: 30653781 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder that is associated with an increased predisposition to certain cancers caused by loss-of-function mutations in one of four DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2). The diagnosis of LS is often challenged by the identification of missense mutations where the functional effects are not known. These are termed variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) and account for 20%-30% of noncoding and missense mutations. VUSs cause ambiguity during clinical diagnosis and hinder implementation of appropriate medical management. In the current study, we focus on the functional and biological consequences of two nonsynonymous VUSs in PMS2. These variants, c.620G>A and c.123_131delGTTAGTAGA, result in the alteration of glycine 207 to glutamate (p.Gly207Glu) and the deletion of amino acid residues 42-44 (p.Leu42_Glu44del), respectively. While the PMS2 p.Gly207Glu variant retains in vitro MMR and ATPase activities, PMS2 p.Leu42_Glu44del appears to lack such capabilities. Structural and biophysical characterization using circular dichroism, small-angle X-ray scattering, and X-ray crystallography of the N-terminal domain of the PMS2 variants indicate that the p.Gly207Glu variant is properly folded similar to the wild-type enzyme, whereas p.Leu42_Glu44del is disordered and prone to aggregation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M D'Arcy
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama
| | - Jessa Blount
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama
| | - Aishwarya Prakash
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
A practical guide to biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:1-15. [PMID: 30600322 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0136-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Evaluation of microsatellite instability (MSI) of every colorectal cancer (CRC) is important for prognostic and therapeutic purposes, while molecular testing helps identify actionable targeted therapy for patients with metastatic disease. This review will discuss the biomarkers commonly encountered in the clinical evaluation of CRC, and practical issues regarding MSI screening, reporting, interpretation, molecular test indication, and specimen requirements.
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu Q, Tan YQ. Advances in Identification of Susceptibility Gene Defects of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer. J Cancer 2019; 10:643-653. [PMID: 30719162 PMCID: PMC6360424 DOI: 10.7150/jca.28542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system worldwide, associated with hereditary genetic features. CRC with a Mendelian genetic predisposition accounts for approximately 5-10% of total CRC cases, mainly caused by a single germline mutation of a CRC susceptibility gene. The main subtypes of hereditary CRC are hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). With the rapid development of genetic testing methods, especially next-generation sequencing technology, multiple genes have now been confirmed to be pathogenic, including DNA repair or DNA mismatch repair genes such as APC, MLH1, and MSH2. Since familial CRC patients have poor clinical outcomes, timely clinical diagnosis and mutation screening of susceptibility genes will aid clinicians in establishing appropriate risk assessment and treatment interventions at a personal level. Here, we systematically summarize the susceptibility genes identified to date and the potential pathogenic mechanism of HNPCC and FAP development. Moreover, clinical recommendations for susceptibility gene screening, diagnosis, and treatment of HNPCC and FAP are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Liu
- Hunan Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| | - Yue-Qiu Tan
- Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jang M, Kwon Y, Kim H, Kim H, Min BS, Park Y, Kim TI, Hong SP, Kim WK. Microsatellite instability test using peptide nucleic acid probe-mediated melting point analysis: a comparison study. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1218. [PMID: 30514259 PMCID: PMC6280403 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5127-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Analysis of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) phenotype in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is important for evaluating prognosis and choosing a proper adjuvant therapy. Although the conventional MSI analysis methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) show high specificity and sensitivity, there are substantial barriers to their use. Methods In this study, we analyzed the MSI detection performance of three molecular tests and IHC. For the molecular tests, we included a recently developed peptide nucleic acid probe (PNA)-mediated real-time PCR-based method using five quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeat markers (PNA method) and two conventional PCR fragment analysis methods using NCI markers (NCI method) or five quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeat markers (MNR method). IHC analysis was performed with four mismatch repair proteins. The performance of each method was validated in 166 CRC patient samples, which consisted of 76 MSI-H and 90 microsatellite stable (MSS) CRCs previously diagnosed by NCI method. Results Of the 166 CRCs, 76 MSI-H and 90 MSS CRCs were determined by PNA method. On the other hand, 75 MSI-H and 91 MSS CRCs were commonly determined by IHC and MNR methods. Based on the originally diagnosed MSI status, PNA showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity while IHC and MNR showed 98.68% sensitivity and 100% specificity. When we analyzed the maximum sensitivity of MNR and PNA method, which used the same five markers, PNA method could detect alterations in all five mononucleotide repeat markers in samples containing down to 5% MSI-H DNAs, whereas MNR required at least 20% MSI-H DNAs to achieve the same performance. Conclusions Based on these findings, we suggest that PNA method can be used as a practical laboratory test for the diagnosis of MSI. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5127-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Jang
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Yujin Kwon
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.,Brain Korea 21 PLUS Projects for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Hoguen Kim
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.,Brain Korea 21 PLUS Projects for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Hyunki Kim
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Byung Soh Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Yehyun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Tae Il Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
| | - Sung Pil Hong
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W120NN, UK
| | - Won Kyu Kim
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. .,Brain Korea 21 PLUS Projects for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Veroushka Ballester
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Marcia Cruz-Correa
- Departments of Medicine, Biochemistry and Surgery, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico; Division of Cancer Biology, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Patel SA, Longacre TA, Ladabaum U, Lebensohn A, Lin AY, Haraldsdottir S. Tumor Molecular Testing Guides Anti-PD-1 Therapy and Provides Evidence for Pathogenicity of Mismatch Repair Variants. Oncologist 2018; 23:1395-1400. [PMID: 30072391 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is characterized by germline abnormalities in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, leading to predisposition to multiple cancers [1]. A second hit to the unaffected allele is required for tumorigenesis. MMR proteins repair incorrectly paired nucleotides and prevent generation of insertions and deletions at microsatellites [2]. Aberrancies in these MMR proteins can be a result of germline mutations or somatic alterations. Defective MMR results in microsatellite instability (MSI) and a high mutational burden [3].The clinical implications of MSI are becoming readily apparent, as presence of MSI leads to the generation of neoantigens, stimulating tumor-associated lymphocytes [4], [5]. This has led to the use of programmed cell death protein 1 blockade for MMR-deficient tumors [6]. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved pembrolizumab for any advanced solid tumor demonstrating MSI and nivolumab for metastatic MSI colorectal cancer. However, the clinical significance of numerous MMR gene variants remains uncertain. The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumors classification system categorizes 2,360 MMR variants, which can be used to gauge pathogenicity [7]. There are many variants of uncertain significance (VUS; or class 3) for which clinicians are unable to provide recommendations. In this study, we employed the combination of germline testing and tumor mutational assessment to help discern the clinical relevance of VUS and guide immunotherapeutic decisions. KEY POINTS: A clinical dilemma arises when genomic testing yields variants of uncertain significance (VUS).Germline VUS were identified in two patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, but only one patient had a second-hit mutation in a mismatch repair gene leading to mismatch repair deficiency that conferred response to immunotherapy.The combination of germline testing along with tumor mutational assessment can help discern the clinical relevance of VUS and can help guide therapeutic decision-making toward individualized patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyam A Patel
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexandra Lebensohn
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Albert Y Lin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sigurdis Haraldsdottir
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stewart CJR, Pearn A, Pachter N, Tan A. Peritumoral granulomatous reaction in endometrial carcinoma: association with DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency, particularly loss of PMS2 expression. Histopathology 2018; 73:428-437. [PMID: 29710374 DOI: 10.1111/his.13641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The observation of peritumoral granulomatous reactions (PGRs) in two endometrial carcinomas (ECs) with a PMS2-deficient/MLH1-intact expression pattern led us to investigate whether PGRs in EC were specifically associated with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency, particularly PMS2 loss. METHODS AND RESULTS Hysterectomy specimens from 22 MMR protein-intact and 54 MMR protein-deficient ECs were reviewed with specific attention to the presence of a PGR and a tumour-associated lymphoid reaction [including tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and stromal lymphoid infiltrates]. The MMR protein-deficient ECs included 22 cases with combined MLH1/PMS2 loss, 11 with combined MSH2/MSH6 loss, 11 with isolated MSH6 loss, and 10 with PMS2 loss but intact MLH1 staining (including the two 'index' cases). Overall, PGRs were identified in seven of 54 (13%) MMR protein-deficient ECs, five of which showed a PMS2-deficient/MLH1-intact immunophenotype; three of these patients had germline PMS2 mutations and one additional patient had a germline MSH6 mutation. None of the MMR protein-intact tumours showed a PGR. Although five of the seven PGR-positive ECs had a high-grade histological component, six were stage I. Most ECs with PGRs also showed TILs and stromal lymphoid reactions, similarly to MMR protein-deficient ECs in general. CONCLUSIONS MMR protein-deficient ECs, particularly those with PMS2 loss, occasionally show PGRs in addition to stromal lymphoid infiltrates and TILs. Therefore, PGRs could be considered to constitute a histological prompt for consideration of Lynch syndrome. The potential prognostic significance of PGRs in EC requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin J R Stewart
- Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School for Women's and Infants' Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Amy Pearn
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Adeline Tan
- Western Diagnostic Pathology, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alpert L, Pai RK, Srivastava A, McKinnon W, Wilcox R, Yantiss RK, Arcega R, Wang HL, Robert ME, Liu X, Pai RK, Zhao L, Westerhoff M, Hampel H, Kupfer S, Setia N, Xiao SY, Hart J, Frankel WL. Colorectal Carcinomas With Isolated Loss of PMS2 Staining by Immunohistochemistry. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142:523-528. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0156-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Context.—
Isolated loss of PMS2 staining is an uncommon immunophenotype in colorectal carcinomas, accounting for approximately 4% of tumors with microsatellite instability. Limited information regarding these tumors is available in the literature.
Objective.—
To compare the clinicopathologic features of colorectal carcinomas with isolated PMS2 loss by immunohistochemistry to those with other forms of mismatch repair deficiency.
Design.—
Ninety-three colorectal carcinomas with isolated PMS2 loss by immunohistochemistry and 193 with other forms of mismatch repair deficiency were identified. Forty (43%) of the isolated PMS2 loss cases and 35 control cases (18%) had a known germline mutation or a clinical diagnosis of Lynch syndrome.
Results.—
Overall, isolated PMS2-loss tumors occurred in significantly younger patients (P < .001) and in fewer female patients (P = .006). These tumors were significantly less likely to be right-sided (P = .001), high-grade (P = .01), or display histologic features of microsatellite instability (P < .001). The isolated PMS2-loss group also exhibited increased odds of disease-specific death (odds ratio [OR], 3.09; 95% CI, 1.41–6.85; P = .007). When the analysis was restricted to germline mutation/Lynch syndrome cases and controls, no significant differences were detected for age, sex, tumor location, tumor grade, histologic features, or distant metastases, although a trend toward increased odds of disease-specific death in the isolated PMS2-loss group was evident (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 0.89–27.04; P = .10).
Conclusions.—
Unusual clinicopathologic features observed in colorectal carcinomas with isolated PMS2 loss are likely related to the high proportion of cases caused by germline mutations. Isolated PMS2-loss tumors may demonstrate more aggressive behavior than other tumors with microsatellite instability, but larger studies are needed to investigate that possibility further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wendy L. Frankel
- From the Departments of Pathology (Drs Alpert, Setia, Xiao, and Hart) and Medicine (Dr Kupfer), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Reetesh Pai); the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Srivastava); the Departments of Medicine (Ms McKinnon) and Patho
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lorans M, Dow E, Macrae FA, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. Update on Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Improving the Clinical Utility of Multigene Panel Testing. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 17:e293-e305. [PMID: 29454559 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC), one of the most common cancers, is a major public health issue globally, especially in Westernized countries. Up to 35% of CRCs are thought to be due to heritable factors, but currently only 5% to 10% of CRCs are attributable to high-risk mutations in known CRC susceptibility genes, predominantly the mismatch repair genes (Lynch syndrome) and adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC; familial adenomatous polyposis). In this era of precision medicine, high-risk mutation carriers, when identified, can be offered various risk management options that prevent cancers and improve survival, including risk-reducing medication, screening for early detection, and surgery. The practice of clinical genetics is currently transitioning from phenotype-directed single gene testing to multigene panels, now offered by numerous providers. For CRC, the genes included across these panels vary, ranging from well established, clinically actionable susceptibility genes with quantified magnitude of risk, to genes that lack extensive validation or have less evidence of association with CRC and, therefore, have minimal clinical utility. The current lack of consensus regarding inclusion of genes in CRC panels presents challenges in patient counseling and management, particularly when a variant in a less validated gene is identified. Furthermore, there remain considerable challenges regarding variant interpretation even for the well established CRC susceptibility genes. Ironically though, only through more widespread testing and the accumulation of large international data sets will sufficient information be generated to (i) enable well powered studies to determine if a gene is associated with CRC susceptibility, (ii) to develop better models for variant interpretation and (iii) to facilitate clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Lorans
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eryn Dow
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Markow M, Chen W, Frankel WL. Immunohistochemical Pitfalls: Common Mistakes in the Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome. Surg Pathol Clin 2017; 10:977-1007. [PMID: 29103543 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2017.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
At least 15% of colorectal cancers diagnosed in the United States are deficient in mismatch repair mechanisms. Most of these are sporadic, but approximately 3% of colorectal cancers result from germline alterations in mismatch repair genes and represent Lynch syndrome. It is critical to identify patients with Lynch syndrome to institute appropriate screening and surveillance for patients and their families. Exclusion of Lynch syndrome in sporadic cases is equally important because it reduces anxiety for patients and prevents excessive spending on unnecessary surveillance. Immunohistochemistry is one of the most widely used screening tools for identifying patients with Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Markow
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 129 Hamilton Hall, 1645 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 129 Hamilton Hall, 1645 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Wendy L Frankel
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 129 Hamilton Hall, 1645 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Raskin L, Guo Y, Du L, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Lindor NM, Gruber SB, Buchanan DD. Targeted sequencing of established and candidate colorectal cancer genes in the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort. Oncotarget 2017; 8:93450-93463. [PMID: 29212164 PMCID: PMC5706810 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The underlying genetic cause of colorectal cancer (CRC) can be identified for 5-10% of all cases, while at least 20% of CRC cases are thought to be due to inherited genetic factors. Screening for highly penetrant mutations in genes associated with Mendelian cancer syndromes using next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be prohibitively expensive for studies requiring large samples sizes. The aim of the study was to identify rare single nucleotide variants and small indels in 40 established or candidate CRC susceptibility genes in 1,046 familial CRC cases (including both MSS and MSI-H tumor subtypes) and 1,006 unrelated controls from the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort using a robust and cost-effective DNA pooling NGS strategy. We identified 264 variants in 38 genes that were observed only in cases, comprising either very rare (minor allele frequency <0.001) or not previously reported (n=90, 34%) in reference databases, including six stop-gain, three frameshift, and 255 non-synonymous variants predicted to be damaging. We found novel germline mutations in established CRC genes MLH1, APC, and POLE, and likely pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes BAP1, CDH1, CHEK2, ENG, and MSH3. For the candidate CRC genes, we identified likely pathogenic variants in the helicase domain of POLQ and in the LRIG1, SH2B3, and NOS1 genes and present their clinicopathological characteristics. Using a DNA pooling NGS strategy, we identified novel germline mutations in established CRC susceptibility genes in familial CRC cases. Further studies are required to support the role of POLQ, LRIG1, SH2B3 and NOS1 as CRC susceptibility genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Raskin
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yan Guo
- Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Liping Du
- Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR)
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Comprehensive Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Genetic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Noralane M. Lindor
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Stephen B. Gruber
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Genetic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Germline Mutations in MLH1 Leading to Isolated Loss of PMS2 Expression in Lynch Syndrome: Implications for Diagnostics in the Clinic. Am J Surg Pathol 2017; 41:861-864. [DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
31
|
Chen W, Swanson BJ, Frankel WL. Molecular genetics of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer for pathologists. Diagn Pathol 2017; 12:24. [PMID: 28259170 PMCID: PMC5336657 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-017-0613-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancers (CRC) that are due to deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) represent approximately 15% of all CRCs in the United States. These microsatellite-unstable CRCs represent a heterogenous group of diseases with distinct oncogenesis pathways. There are overlapping clinicopathologic features between some of these groups, but many important differences are present. Therefore, determination of the etiology for the dMMR is vital for proper patient management and follow-up. Main body Epigenetic inactivation of MLH1 MMR gene (sporadic microsatellite-unstable CRC) and germline mutation in an MMR gene (Lynch syndrome, LS) are the two most common mechanisms in the pathogenesis of microsatellite instability in CRC. However, in a subset of dMMR CRC cases that are identified by screening tests, no known LS-associated genetic alterations are appreciated by current genetic analysis. When the etiology for dMMR is unclear, it leads to patient anxiety and creates challenges for clinical management. Conclusion It is critical to distinguish LS patients from other patients with tumors due to dMMR, so that the proper screening protocol can be employed for the patients and their families, with the goal to save lives while avoiding unnecessary anxiety and costs. This review summarizes the major pathogenesis pathways of dMMR CRCs, their clinicopathologic features, and practical screening suggestions. In addition, we include frequently asked questions for MMR immunohistochemistry interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chen
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, S301 Rhodes Hall, 450 W. 10th Ave, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA.,Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 129 Hamilton Hall, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
| | - Benjamin J Swanson
- Department of Pathology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985900 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
| | - Wendy L Frankel
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, S301 Rhodes Hall, 450 W. 10th Ave, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA. .,Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 129 Hamilton Hall, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dashti SG, Buchanan DD, Jayasekara H, Ait Ouakrim D, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Winship IM, Macrae FA, Giles GG, Parry S, Casey G, Haile RW, Gallinger S, Le Marchand L, Thibodeau SN, Lindor NM, Newcomb PA, Potter JD, Baron JA, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA, Win AK. Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer for Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017; 26:366-375. [PMID: 27811119 PMCID: PMC5336397 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Revised: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: People with germline mutation in one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes have increased colorectal cancer risk. For these high-risk people, study findings of the relationship between alcohol consumption and colorectal cancer risk have been inconclusive.Methods: 1,925 MMR gene mutations carriers recruited into the Colon Cancer Family Registry who had completed a questionnaire on lifestyle factors were included. Weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between alcohol consumption and colorectal cancer.Results: Colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 769 carriers (40%) at a mean (SD) age of 42.6 (10.3) years. Compared with abstention, ethanol consumption from any alcoholic beverage up to 14 g/day and >28 g/day was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.09-2.07 and 1.69; 95% CI, 1.07-2.65, respectively; Ptrend = 0.05), and colon cancer risk (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.27-2.49 and 1.94; 95% CI, 1.19-3.18, respectively; Ptrend = 0.02). However, there was no clear evidence for an association with rectal cancer risk. Also, there was no evidence for associations between consumption of individual alcoholic beverage types (beer, wine, spirits) and colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer risk.Conclusions: Our data suggest that alcohol consumption, particularly more than 28 g/day of ethanol (∼2 standard drinks of alcohol in the United States), is associated with increased colorectal cancer risk for MMR gene mutation carriers.Impact: Although these data suggested that alcohol consumption in MMR carriers was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk, there was no evidence of a dose-response, and not all types of alcohol consumption were associated with increased risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 366-75. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ghazaleh Dashti
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Harindra Jayasekara
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Driss Ait Ouakrim
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Parry
- New Zealand Familial Gastrointestinal Cancer Service, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Graham Casey
- Keck School of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Robert W Haile
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, California
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Loïc Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Polly A Newcomb
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - John D Potter
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - John A Baron
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Institute of Health and Environment, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aung Ko Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van der Klift HM, Mensenkamp AR, Drost M, Bik EC, Vos YJ, Gille HJJP, Redeker BEJW, Tiersma Y, Zonneveld JBM, García EG, Letteboer TGW, Olderode-Berends MJW, van Hest LP, van Os TA, Verhoef S, Wagner A, van Asperen CJ, Ten Broeke SW, Hes FJ, de Wind N, Nielsen M, Devilee P, Ligtenberg MJL, Wijnen JT, Tops CMJ. Comprehensive Mutation Analysis of PMS2 in a Large Cohort of Probands Suspected of Lynch Syndrome or Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome. Hum Mutat 2016; 37:1162-1179. [PMID: 27435373 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2016] [Revised: 07/06/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Monoallelic PMS2 germline mutations cause 5%-15% of Lynch syndrome, a midlife cancer predisposition, whereas biallelic PMS2 mutations cause approximately 60% of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD), a rare childhood cancer syndrome. Recently improved DNA- and RNA-based strategies are applied to overcome problematic PMS2 mutation analysis due to the presence of pseudogenes and frequent gene conversion events. Here, we determined PMS2 mutation detection yield and mutation spectrum in a nationwide cohort of 396 probands. Furthermore, we studied concordance between tumor IHC/MSI (immunohistochemistry/microsatellite instability) profile and mutation carrier state. Overall, we found 52 different pathogenic PMS2 variants explaining 121 Lynch syndrome and nine CMMRD patients. In vitro mismatch repair assays suggested pathogenicity for three missense variants. Ninety-one PMS2 mutation carriers (70%) showed isolated loss of PMS2 in their tumors, for 31 (24%) no or inconclusive IHC was available, and eight carriers (6%) showed discordant IHC (presence of PMS2 or loss of both MLH1 and PMS2). Ten cases with isolated PMS2 loss (10%; 10/97) harbored MLH1 mutations. We confirmed that recently improved mutation analysis provides a high yield of PMS2 mutations in patients with isolated loss of PMS2 expression. Application of universal tumor prescreening methods will however miss some PMS2 germline mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen M van der Klift
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. .,Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Drost
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Elsa C Bik
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne J Vos
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans J J P Gille
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert E J W Redeker
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Tiersma
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - José B M Zonneveld
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Encarna Gómez García
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom G W Letteboer
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maran J W Olderode-Berends
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Liselotte P van Hest
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo A van Os
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Senno Verhoef
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Clinical Genetics Service, Saint Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Anja Wagner
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne W Ten Broeke
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik J Hes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Niels de Wind
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Juul T Wijnen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carli M J Tops
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|