1
|
Taqif H, Adisso L, Gomes Souza L, Dofara SG, Ghio SC, Rivest LP, Légaré F. Changes in intention to use an interprofessional approach to decision-making following training: a cluster before-and-after study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:437. [PMID: 38589863 PMCID: PMC11000315 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10899-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health professionals in home care work in interprofessional teams. Yet most training in decision support assumes a one-on-one relationship with patients. We assessed the impact of an in-person training session in interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) on home care professionals' intention to adopt this approach. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a cluster stepped-wedge trial using a before-and-after study design. We collected data among home care professionals from November 2016 to February 2018 in 9 health and social services centers in Quebec, Canada. The intervention was an in-person IP-SDM training session. Intention to engage in IP-SDM pre- and post-session (dependent variable) was compared using a continuing professional development evaluation scale (CPD-Reaction) informed by the Godin's Integrated Behavioral Model for health professionals. We also assessed socio-demographic and psychosocial variables (beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, social influence and moral norm). We performed bivariate and multivariate analysis to identify factors influencing post-intervention intention. We used the STROBE reporting guidelines for observational studies to report our results. RESULTS Of 134 respondents who provided complete pairs of questionnaires (pre- and post-), most were female (90.9%), mean age was 42 (± 9.3) years and 66.9% were social workers. Mean intention scores decreased from 5.84 (± 1.19) to 5.54 (± 1.35) (Mean difference = -0.30 ± 1.16; p = 0.02). Factors associated with higher intention post-intervention were social influence (ß = 0.34, p = 0.01) and belief about capabilities (ß = 0.49, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION After in-person IP-SDM training, healthcare professionals' intention to engage in IP-SDM decreased. However, the scope of this decrease is probably not clinically significant. Due to their association with intention, beliefs about capabilities, which translate into having a sense of self-competency in the new clinical behavior, and social influences, which translate into what important others think one should be doing, could be targets for future research aiming to implement IP-SDM in home care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajar Taqif
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Lionel Adisso
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Lucas Gomes Souza
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Suélène Georgina Dofara
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Sergio Cortez Ghio
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Louis-Paul Rivest
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singh SP. Bayesian optimal stepped wedge design. Biom J 2024; 66:e2300168. [PMID: 38057145 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202300168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Recently, there has been a growing interest in designing cluster trials using stepped wedge design (SWD). An SWD is a type of cluster-crossover design in which clusters of individuals are randomized unidirectional from a control to an intervention at certain time points. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) that measures the dependency of subject within a cluster plays an important role in design and analysis of stepped wedge trials. In this paper, we discuss a Bayesian approach to address the dependency of SWD on the ICC and robust Bayesian SWDs are proposed. Bayesian design is shown to be more robust against the misspecification of the parameter values compared to the locally optimal design. Designs are obtained for the various choices of priors assigned to the ICC. A detailed sensitivity analysis is performed to assess the robustness of proposed optimal designs. The power superiority of Bayesian design against the commonly used balanced design is demonstrated numerically using hypothetical as well as real scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satya Prakash Singh
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Gavaruzzi T, Finderup J, Mooney A. Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:i20-i38. [PMID: 37711634 PMCID: PMC10497379 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney services vary in the way they involve people with kidney failure (PwKF) in treatment decisions as management needs change. We discuss how decision-science applications support proactively PwKF to make informed decisions between treatment options with kidney professionals. Methods A conceptual review of findings about decision making and use of decision aids in kidney services, synthesized with reference to: the Making Informed Decisions-Individually and Together (MIND-IT) multiple stakeholder decision makers framework; and the Medical Research Council-Complex Intervention Development and Evaluation research framework. Results This schema represents the different types of decision aids that support PwKF and professional reasoning as they manage kidney disease individually and together; adjustments at micro, meso and macro levels supports integration in practice. Conclusion Innovating services to meet clinical guidelines on enhancing shared decision making processes means enabling all stakeholders to use decision aids to meet their goals within kidney pathways at individual, service and organizational levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary L Bekker
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
- ResCenPI – Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Anna E Winterbottom
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Renal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Teresa Gavaruzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- ResCenPI – Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Andrew Mooney
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Renal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Naye F, Légaré F, Paquette JS, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, LeBlanc A, Gaboury I, Poitras ME, Toupin-April K, Li LC, Hoens A, Poirier MD, Décary S. Decisional needs assessment for patient-centred pain care in Canada: the DECIDE-PAIN study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066189. [PMID: 37156591 PMCID: PMC10173373 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 2021 Action Plan for Pain from the Canadian Pain Task Force advocates for patient-centred pain care at all levels of healthcare across provinces. Shared decision-making is the crux of patient-centred care. Implementing the action plan will require innovative shared decision-making interventions, specifically following the disruption of chronic pain care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The first step in this endeavour is to assess current decisional needs (ie, decisions most important to them) of Canadians with chronic pain across their care pathways. METHODS AND ANALYSIS DesignGrounded in patient-oriented research approaches, we will perform an online population-based survey across the ten Canadian provinces. We will report methods and data following the CROSS reporting guidelines.SamplingThe Léger Marketing company will administer the online population-based survey to its representative panel of 500 000 Canadians to recruit 1646 adults (age ≥18 years old) with chronic pain according to the definition by the International Association for the Study of Pain (eg, pain ≥12 weeks). ContentBased on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, the self-administered survey has been codesigned with patients and contain six core domains: (1) healthcare services, consultation and postpandemic needs, (2) difficult decisions experienced, (3) decisional conflict, (4) decisional regret, (5) decisional needs and (6) sociodemographic characteristics. We will use several strategies such as random sampling to improve survey quality. AnalysisWe will perform descriptive statistical analysis. We will identify factors associated with clinically significant decisional conflict and decision regret using multivariate analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (project #2022-4645). We will codesign knowledge mobilisation products with research patient partners (eg, graphical summaries and videos). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences to inform the development of innovative shared decision-making interventions for Canadians with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Naye
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec Integrated University Health and Social Services Center, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Paquette
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec Integrated University Health and Social Services Center, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Annie LeBlanc
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec Integrated University Health and Social Services Center, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Gaboury
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medecine and Emergency Medicine, Research Centre of the CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Universite de Sherbrooke Faculte de medecine et des sciences de la sante, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Eve Poitras
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Family Medicine, Research Centre of the CIUSS du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Université de Sherbrooke, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de santé et de services sociaux de Chicoutimi, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karine Toupin-April
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda C Li
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alison Hoens
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Marie-Dominique Poirier
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean du Québec, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bujold M, Pluye P, Légaré F. Decision-making and related outcomes of patients with complex care needs in primary care settings: a systematic literature review with a case-based qualitative synthesis. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:279. [PMID: 36352376 PMCID: PMC9644584 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01879-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In primary care, patients increasingly face difficult decisions related to complex care needs (multimorbidity, polypharmacy, mental health issues, social vulnerability and structural barriers). There is a need for a pragmatic conceptual model to understand decisional needs among patients with complex care needs and outcomes related to decision. We aimed to identify types of decisional needs among patients with complex care needs, and decision-making configurations of conditions associated with decision outcomes. METHODS We conducted a systematic mixed studies review. Two specialized librarians searched five bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SSCI). The search strategy was conducted from inception to December 2017. A team of twenty crowd-reviewers selected empirical studies on: (1) patients with complex care needs; (2) decisional needs; (3) primary care. Two reviewers appraised the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We conducted a 2-phase case-based qualitative synthesis framed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and Gregor's explicative-predictive theory type. A decisional need case involved: (a) a decision (what), (b) concerning a patient with complex care needs with bio-psycho-social characteristics (who), (c) made independently or in partnership (how), (d) in a specific place and time (where/when), (e) with communication and coordination barriers or facilitators (why), and that (f) influenced actions taken, health or well-being, or decision quality (outcomes). RESULTS We included 47 studies. Data sufficiency qualitative criterion was reached. We identified 69 cases (2997 participants across 13 countries) grouped into five types of decisional needs: 'prioritization' (n = 26), 'use of services' (n = 22), 'prescription' (n = 12), 'behavior change' (n = 4) and 'institutionalization' (n = 5). Many decisions were made between clinical encounters in situations of social vulnerability. Patterns of conditions associated with decision outcomes revealed four decision-making configurations: 'well-managed' (n = 13), 'asymmetric encounters' (n = 21), 'self-management by default' (n = 8), and 'chaotic' (n = 27). Shared decision-making was associated with positive outcomes. Negative outcomes were associated with independent decision-making. CONCLUSION Our results could extend decision-making models in primary care settings and inform subsequent user-centered design of decision support tools for heterogenous patients with complex care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Bujold
- Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Pierre Pluye
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Toi AK, Ben Charif A, Lai C, Ngueta G, Plourde KV, Stacey D, Légaré F. Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment. MDM Policy Pract 2022; 7:23814683221124090. [PMID: 36132436 PMCID: PMC9483974 DOI: 10.1177/23814683221124090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Older adults receiving home care services often face
decisions related to aging, illness, and loss of autonomy. To inform tailored
shared decision making interventions, we assessed their decisional needs by
asking about the most common difficult decisions, measured associated decisional
conflict, and identified factors associated with it. Methods. In
March 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with a pan-Canadian Web-based
panel of older adults (≥65 y) receiving home care services. For a difficult
decision they had faced in the past year, we evaluated clinically significant
decisional conflict (CSDC) using the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (score
0–100) with a >37.5 cutoff. To identify factors associated with CSDC, we
performed descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable analyses using the stepwise
selection method with an assumed entry and exit significance level of 0.15 and
0.20, respectively. Final model selection was based on the Bayesian information
criterion. Results. Among 460 participants with an average age of
72.5 y, difficult decisions were, in order of frequency, about housing and
safety (57.2%), managing health conditions (21.8%), and end-of-life care (8.3%).
CSDC was experienced by 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5%, 18.1%) of
respondents on all decision points. Factors associated with CSDC included
household size = 1 (OR [95% CI]: 1.81 [0.99, 3.33]; P = 0.27),
household size = 3 (2.66 [0.78, 8.98]; P = 0.83), and household
size = 4 (6.91 [2.23, 21.39]; P = 0.014); preferred option not
matching the decision made (4.05 [2.05, 7.97]; P < 0.001);
passive role in decision making (5.13 [1.78, 14.77]; P =
0.002); and lower quality of life (0.70 [0.57, 0.87];
P<0.001). Discussion. Some older adults
receiving home care services in Canada experience CSDC when facing difficult
decisions. Shared decision-making interventions could mitigate associated
factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfred Kodjo Toi
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Ali Ben Charif
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Claudia Lai
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Gérard Ngueta
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Karine V. Plourde
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Patient Decision Aids Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lognon T, Gogovor A, Plourde KV, Holyoke P, Lai C, Aubin E, Kastner K, Canfield C, Beleno R, Stacey D, Rivest LP, Légaré F. Predictors of Decision Regret among Caregivers of Older Canadians Receiving Home Care: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. MDM Policy Pract 2022; 7:23814683221116304. [PMID: 35983319 PMCID: PMC9380233 DOI: 10.1177/23814683221116304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. In Canada, caregivers of older adults receiving home
care face difficult decisions that may lead to decision regret. We assessed
difficult decisions and decision regret among caregivers of older adults
receiving home care services and factors associated with decision regret.
Methods. From March 13 to 30, 2020, at the outbreak of the
COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted an online survey with caregivers of older adults
receiving home care in the 10 Canadian provinces. We distributed a
self-administered questionnaire through Canada’s largest and most representative
private online panel. We identified types of difficult health-related decisions
faced in the past year and their frequency and evaluated decision regret using
the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), scored from 0 to 100. We performed descriptive
statistics as well as bivariable and multivariable linear regression to identify
factors predicting decision regret. Results. Among 932
participants, the mean age was 42.2 y (SD = 15.6 y), and 58.4% were male. The
most frequently reported difficult decisions were regarding housing and safety
(75.1%). The mean DRS score was 28.8/100 (SD = 8.6). Factors associated with
less decision regret included higher caregiver age, involvement of other family
members in the decision-making process, wanting to receive information about the
options, and considering organizations interested in the decision topic and
health care professionals as trustworthy sources of information (all
P < 0.001). Factors associated with more decision regret
included mismatch between the caregiver’s preferred option and the decision
made, the involvement of spouses in the decision-making process, higher
decisional conflict, and higher burden of care (all P <
0.001). Discussion. Decisions about housing and safety were the
difficult decisions most frequently encountered by caregivers of older adults in
this survey. Our results will inform future decision support interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Lognon
- VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Amédé Gogovor
- VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Karine V. Plourde
- VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Paul Holyoke
- SE Research Centre, SE Health, Markham, ON, Canada
| | - Claudia Lai
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Carolyn Canfield
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Caregiver Partner, Canada
| | | | - Dawn Stacey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Patient Decision Aids Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Louis-Paul Rivest
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Statistical Sampling and Data Analysis, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Sciences and Engineering, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Adisso ÉL, Taljaard M, Stacey D, Brière N, Zomahoun HTV, Durand PJ, Rivest LP, Légaré F. Does Adding Training in Shared Decision Making for Home Care Teams to Providing Decision Guides Better Engage Frail Elders and Caregivers in Housing Decisions? :A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. JMIR Aging 2022; 5:e39386. [PMID: 35759791 PMCID: PMC9533197 DOI: 10.2196/39386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Frail older adults and caregivers need support from their home care teams in making difficult housing decisions, such as whether to remain at home, with or without assistance, or move into residential care. However, home care teams are often understaffed and busy, and shared decision-making training is costly. Nevertheless, overall awareness of shared decision-making is increasing. We hypothesized that distributing a decision aid could be sufficient for providing decision support without the addition of shared decision-making training for home care teams. Objective We evaluated the effectiveness of adding web-based training and workshops for care teams in interprofessional shared decision-making to passive dissemination of a decision guide on the proportion of frail older adults or caregivers of cognitively-impaired frail older adults reporting active roles in housing decision-making. Methods We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with home care teams in 9 health centers in Quebec, Canada. Participants were frail older adults or caregivers of cognitively impaired frail older adults facing housing decisions and receiving care from the home care team at one of the participating health centers. The intervention consisted of a 1.5-hour web-based tutorial for the home care teams plus a 3.5-hour interactive workshop in interprofessional shared decision-making using a decision guide that was designed to support frail older adults and caregivers in making housing decisions. The control was passive dissemination of the decision guide. The primary outcome was an active role in decision-making among frail older adults and caregivers, measured using the Control Preferences Scale. Secondary outcomes included decisional conflict and perceptions of how much care teams involved frail older adults and caregivers in decision-making. We performed an intention-to-treat analysis. Results A total of 311 frail older adults were included in the analysis, including 208 (66.9%) women, with a mean age of 81.2 (SD 7.5) years. Among 339 caregivers of cognitively-impaired frail older adults, 239 (70.5%) were female and their mean age was 66.4 (SD 11.7) years. The intervention increased the proportion of frail older adults reporting an active role in decision-making by 3.3% (95% CI –5.8% to 12.4%, P=.47) and the proportion of caregivers of cognitively-impaired frail older adults by 6.1% (95% CI -11.2% to 23.4%, P=.49). There was no significant impact on the secondary outcomes. However, the mean score for the frail older adults’ perception of how much health professionals involved them in decision-making increased by 5.4 (95% CI −0.6 to 11.4, P=.07) and the proportion of caregivers who reported decisional conflict decreased by 7.5% (95% CI −16.5% to 1.6%, P=.10). Conclusions Although it slightly reduced decisional conflict for caregivers, shared decision-making training did not equip home care teams significantly better than provision of a decision aid for involving frail older adults and their caregivers in decision-making. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02592525; https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02592525
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière bureau A-3421, Québec, CA.,VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, CA.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, CA
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, CA.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CA
| | - Dawn Stacey
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, CA.,School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CA
| | - Nathalie Brière
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux (CIUSSS) de la Capitale-Nationale, Direction des services multidisciplinaires, Quebec, QC, CA
| | - Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière bureau A-3421, Québec, CA.,VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, CA.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, CA.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec, QC, CA.,Faculty of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, CA
| | - Pierre Jacob Durand
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, CA
| | - Louis-Paul Rivest
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, CA.,Canada Research Chair in Statistical Sampling and Data Analysis, Laval University, Quebec, QC, CA
| | - France Légaré
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière bureau A-3421, Québec, CA.,VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière bureau A-3421, Québec, CA.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière bureau A-3421, Québec, CA.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada, 2325 Rue de l'Université, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, QUEBEC, CA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ayivi-Vinz G, Bakwa Kanyinga F, Bergeron L, Décary S, Adisso ÉL, Zomahoun HTV, Daniel SJ, Tremblay M, Plourde KV, Guay-Bélanger S, Légaré F. Use of the CPD-REACTION Questionnaire to Evaluate Continuing Professional Development Activities for Health Professionals: Systematic Review. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 8:e36948. [PMID: 35318188 PMCID: PMC9112082 DOI: 10.2196/36948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuing professional development (CPD) is essential for physicians to maintain and enhance their knowledge, competence, skills, and performance. Web-based CPD plays an essential role. However, validated theory-informed measures of their impact are lacking. The CPD-REACTION questionnaire is a validated theory-informed tool that evaluates the impact of CPD activities on clinicians' behavioral intentions. OBJECTIVE We aimed to review the use of the CPD-REACTION questionnaire, which measures the impact of CPD activities on health professionals' intentions to change clinical behavior. We examined CPD activity characteristics, ranges of intention, mean scores, score distributions, and psychometric properties. METHODS We conducted a systematic review informed by the Cochrane review methodology. We searched 8 databases from January 1, 2014, to April 20, 2021. Gray literature was identified using Google Scholar and Research Gate. Eligibility criteria included all health care professionals, any study design, and participants' completion of the CPD-REACTION questionnaire either before, after, or before and after a CPD activity. Study selection, data extraction, and study quality evaluation were independently performed by 2 reviewers. We extracted data on characteristics of studies, the CPD activity (eg, targeted clinical behavior and format), and CPD-REACTION use. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Data extracted were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Student t test (2-tailed) for bivariate analysis. The results are presented as a narrative synthesis reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS Overall, 65 citations were eligible and referred to 52 primary studies. The number of primary studies reporting the use of CPD-REACTION has increased continuously since 2014 from 1 to 16 publications per year (2021). It is available in English, French, Spanish, and Dutch. Most of the studies were conducted in Canada (30/52, 58%). Furthermore, 40 different clinical behaviors were identified. The most common CPD format was e-learning (34/52, 65%). The original version of the CPD-REACTION questionnaire was used in 31 of 52 studies, and an adapted version in 18 of 52 studies. In addition, 31% (16/52) of the studies measured both the pre- and postintervention scores. In 22 studies, CPD providers were university-based. Most studies targeted interprofessional groups of health professionals (31/52, 60%). CONCLUSIONS The use of CPD-REACTION has increased rapidly and across a wide range of clinical behaviors and formats, including a web-based format. Further research should investigate the most effective way to adapt the CPD-REACTION questionnaire to a variety of clinical behaviors and contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42018116492; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=116492.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Ayivi-Vinz
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Felly Bakwa Kanyinga
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Lysa Bergeron
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Unité de Soutien SSA Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Sam J Daniel
- Direction du Développement Professionnel Continu, Fédération des Médecins Spécialistes du Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Tremblay
- Direction du Développement Professionnel Continu, Fédération des Médecins Spécialistes du Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Karine V Plourde
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Sabrina Guay-Bélanger
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Unité de Soutien SSA Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Improving the Process of Shared Decision-Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12020256. [PMID: 35207744 PMCID: PMC8879344 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The integration of face-to-face communication and online processes to provide access to information and self-assessment tools may improve shared decision-making (SDM) processes. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of implementing an online SDM process with topics and content developed through a participatory design approach. We analyzed the triggered and completed SDM cases with responses from participants at a medical center in Taiwan. Data were retrieved from the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database of the hospital for analysis. Each team developed web-based patient decision aids (PDA) with empirical evidence in a multi-digitized manner, allowing patients to scan QR codes on a leaflet using their mobile phones and then read the PDA content online. From July 2019 to December 2020, 48 web-based SDM topics were implemented in the 24 clinical departments of this hospital. The results showed that using the REDCap system improved SDM efficiency and quality. Implementing an online SDM process integrated with face-to-face communication enhanced the practice and effectiveness of SDM, possibly through the flexibility of accessing information, self-assessment, and feedback evaluation.
Collapse
|
11
|
van Veenendaal H, Voogdt-Pruis HR, Ubbink DT, van Weele E, Koco L, Schuurman M, Oskam J, Visserman E, Hilders CGJM. Evaluation of a multilevel implementation program for timeout and shared decision making in breast cancer care: a mixed methods study among 11 hospital teams. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:114-127. [PMID: 34016497 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluation of a multilevel implementation program on shared decision making (SDM) for breast cancer clinicians. METHODS The program was based on the 'Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations-model' (MIDI). Key factors for effective implementation were included. Eleven breast cancer teams selected from two geographical areas participated; first six surgery teams and second five systemic therapy teams. A mixed method evaluation was carried out at the end of each period: Descriptive statistics were used for surveys and thematic content analysis for semi-structured interviews. RESULTS Twenty-eight clinicians returned the questionnaire (42%). Clinicians (96%) endorse that SDM is relevant to breast cancer care. The program supported adoption of SDM in their practice. Limited financial means, time constraints and concurrent activities were frequently reported barriers. Interviews (n = 21) showed that using a 4-step SDM model - when reinforced by practical examples, handy cards, feedback and training - helped to internalize SDM theory. Clinicians experienced positive results for their patients and themselves. Task re-assignment and flexible outpatient planning reinforce sustainable change. Patient involvement was valued. CONCLUSION Our program supported breast cancer clinicians to adopt SDM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS To implement SDM, multilevel approaches are needed that reinforce intrinsic motivation by demonstrating benefits for patients and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haske van Veenendaal
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Dutch Association of Oncology Patient Organizations, Godebaldkwartier 363, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Helene R Voogdt-Pruis
- Dutch Association of Oncology Patient Organizations, Godebaldkwartier 363, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands; UMCU Julius Global Health, PO box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Esther van Weele
- Dutch Association of Oncology Patient Organizations, Godebaldkwartier 363, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands; Vestalia, Acaciapark 136, 1213 LD Hilversum, The Netherlands.
| | - Lejla Koco
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 22, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Maaike Schuurman
- Dutch Association of Breast Cancer Patients, Godebaldkwartier 363, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jannie Oskam
- Dutch Association of Breast Cancer Patients, Godebaldkwartier 363, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ella Visserman
- Dutch Association of Oncology Patient Organizations, Godebaldkwartier 363, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Carina G J M Hilders
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Board of Directors, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625 AD Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gaboury I, Tousignant M, Corriveau H, Menear M, Le Dorze G, Rochefort C, Vachon B, Rochette A, Gosselin S, Michaud F, Bollen J, Dean S. Effects of Telerehabilitation on Patient Adherence to a Rehabilitation Plan: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e32134. [PMID: 34709196 PMCID: PMC8587325 DOI: 10.2196/32134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Strong evidence supports beginning stroke rehabilitation as soon as the patient’s medical status has stabilized and continuing following discharge from acute care. However, adherence to rehabilitation treatments over the rehabilitation phase has been shown to be suboptimal. Objective The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a telerehabilitation platform on stroke patients’ adherence to a rehabilitation plan and on their level of reintegration into normal social activities, in comparison with usual care. The primary outcome is patient adherence to stroke rehabilitation (up to 12 weeks), which is hypothesized to influence reintegration into normal living. Secondary outcomes for patients include functional recovery and independence, depression, adverse events related to telerehabilitation, use of services (up to 6 months), perception of interprofessional shared decision making, and quality of services received. Interprofessional collaboration as well as quality of interprofessional shared decision making will be measured with clinicians. Methods In this interrupted time series with a convergent qualitative component, rehabilitation teams will be trained to develop rehabilitation treatment plans that engage the patient and family, while taking advantage of a telerehabilitation platform to deliver the treatment. The intervention will be comprised of 220 patients who will take part in stroke telerehabilitation with an interdisciplinary group of clinicians (telerehabilitation group) versus face-to-face standard of care (control group: n=110 patients). Results Our Research Ethics Board approved the study in June 2020. Data collection for the control group is underway, with another year planned before we begin the intervention phase. Conclusions This study will contribute to the minimization of both knowledge and practice gaps, while producing robust, in-depth data on the factors related to the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in a stroke rehabilitation continuum. Findings will inform best practice guidelines regarding telecare services and the provision of telerehabilitation, including recommendations for effective interdisciplinary collaboration regarding stroke rehabilitation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04440215; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04440215 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/32134
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Gaboury
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Tousignant
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Hélène Corriveau
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Matthew Menear
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Guylaine Le Dorze
- School of Audiology and Speech Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Christian Rochefort
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Brigitte Vachon
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Annie Rochette
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sylvie Gosselin
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - François Michaud
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Jessica Bollen
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Dean
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vogel A, Balzer F, Fürstenau D. The social construction of the patient-physician relationship in the clinical encounter: Media frames on shared decision making in Germany. Soc Sci Med 2021; 289:114420. [PMID: 34607053 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The literature on healthcare management has noted that shared decision-making (SDM) - a practice of organizing joint decisions between healthcare professionals and patients - should improve healthcare outcomes through patient engagement and autonomy, fostering patient-centeredness. While SDM projects are implemented across Europe and the US, the diffusion of the practice remains partial, and its' conceptualization scattered. Healthcare management literature explores SDM on the underlying assumption that its limited diffusion results from an information problem, implying objective criteria and rational behavior. The purpose of this research is to study the social construction of SDM within the clinical setting and the underlying rationales using the case of one of the largest healthcare markets worldwide - Germany. To capture the complexity of SDM, a frame analysis is conducted on its medial representations. News media is both influential in shaping public opinion, as well as in generating public discourse. This analysis enables one to elaborate different facets of the construct of SDM, to capture inherent patterns of facilitating and obstructing aspects and to explore consequences for the diffusion of SDM. Three facilitating and three obstructive frames on the implementation of SDM were identified. The polarities of these frames range from the questioning of one's decision-making authority to the perception of individual competence and decision-making agency. Moreover, this study reflects on how physicians' and patients' role for SDM is conceived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amyn Vogel
- Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics, Department of Information Systems, Germany.
| | - Felix Balzer
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Daniel Fürstenau
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Digitalization, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lai C, Holyoke P, Plourde KV, Décary S, Légaré F. What older adults and their caregivers need for making better health-related decisions at home: a participatory mixed methods protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039102. [PMID: 33168556 PMCID: PMC7654109 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shared decision making is an interpersonal process whereby healthcare providers collaborate with and support patients in decision-making. Older adults receiving home care need support with decision-making. We will explore what older adults receiving home care and their caregivers need for making better health-related decisions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This two-phase sequential exploratory mixed methods study will be conducted in a pan-Canadian healthcare organisation, SE Health. First, we will create a participant advisory group to advise us throughout the research process. In phase 1 (qualitative), we will recruit a convenience sample of 15-30 older adults and caregivers receiving home care to participate in open-ended semi-structured interviews. Phase 1 participants will be invited to share what health-related decisions they face at home and what they need for making better decisions. In phase 2 (quantitative), interdisciplinary health and social care providers will be invited to answer a web-based survey to share their views on the decisional needs of older adults and their caregivers. The survey will include questions informed by findings from qualitative interviews in phase 1, and a workbook for assessing decisional needs based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Finally, qualitative and quantitative results will be triangulated (by methods, investigator, theory and source) to develop a comprehensive understanding of decision-making needs from the perspective of older adults, caregivers and health and social care providers. We will use the quality of mixed methods studies in health services research guidelines and the Checklist for Reporting the Results of Internet E-Surveys checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from the research ethics boards at Southlake Regional Health Centre and Université Laval. This study will inform the design of decision support interventions. Further dissemination plans include summary briefs for study participants, tailored reports for home care decision makers and policy makers, and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04327830.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Lai
- Tier 1 Canada Research in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- SE Research Centre, SE Health, Markham, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Holyoke
- SE Research Centre, SE Health, Markham, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karine V Plourde
- Tier 1 Canada Research in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- Tier 1 Canada Research in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Tier 1 Canada Research in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval Primary Care Research Centre (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Garvelink MM, Agbadjé TT, Freitas A, Bergeron L, Petitjean T, Dugas M, Blair L, Archambault P, Roy N, Jones A, Légaré F. Improving a Web-Based Tool to Support Older Adults to Stay Independent at Home: Qualitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e16979. [PMID: 32412908 PMCID: PMC7407259 DOI: 10.2196/16979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Older adults desire to stay independent at home for as long as possible. We developed an interactive website to inform older adults and caregivers about ways to achieve this. Objective This study aimed to perform an in-depth exploration among potential end users about how to improve the interactive website to better inform older adults and caregivers about ways to stay independent at home. Methods To complement the results of a quantitative survey on the usability and acceptability of the website before implementation, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study. Using multiple recruitment strategies, we recruited a purposeful sample of older adults (aged ≥65 years) and caregivers of older adults struggling to stay independent at home. We conducted face-to-face or telephonic interviews in either English or French. In addition, we collected sociodemographic characteristics, other characteristics of participants (eg, health, digital profile, and perception of retirement homes), and experiences with using the website (factors facilitating the use of the website, barriers to its use, and suggestions for improvement). Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed by two researchers. Results We recruited 15 participants, including 5 older adults (mean age 75 years, SD 6) and 10 caregivers (mean age 57 years, SD 14). The mean interview time was 32 min (SD 14). Most older adults had either mobility or health problems or both, and many of them were receiving home care services (eg, blood pressure measurement and body care). Overall, participants found the website easy to navigate using a computer, reassuring, and useful for obtaining information. Barriers were related to navigation (eg, difficult to navigate with a cellphone), relevance (eg, no specific section for caregivers), realism (eg, some resources presented are not state funded), understandability (eg, the actors’ accents were difficult to understand), and accessibility (eg, not adapted for low digital literacy). Suggestions for improvement included a needs assessment section to direct users to the support appropriate to their needs, addition of information about moving into residential care, a section for caregivers, distinction between state-provided and private support services, simpler language, expansion of content to be relevant to all of Canada, and video subtitles for the hearing impaired. Conclusions Users provided a wealth of information about the needs of older adults who were facing a loss of autonomy and about what such a website could usefully provide. The request for less generic and more personalized information reflects the wide range of needs that electronic health innovations, such as our interactive website, need to address. After integrating the changes suggested, the new website—Support for Older Adults to Stay Independent at Home (SUSTAIN)—will be implemented and made available to better assist older adults and caregivers in staying independent at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Marjolein Garvelink
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Adriana Freitas
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Lysa Bergeron
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas Petitjean
- Centre for Digital Media, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michèle Dugas
- Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation Component of the Quebec SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Louisa Blair
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick Archambault
- Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Ste-Marie, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche intégré pour un système apprenant en santé et services sociaux, Lévis, QC, Canada.,Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Noémie Roy
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,School of Architecture, Faculty of Planning, Architecture, Arts and Design, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Allyson Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ben Charif A, Croteau J, Adekpedjou R, Zomahoun HTV, Adisso EL, Légaré F. Implementation Research on Shared Decision Making in Primary Care: Inventory of Intracluster Correlation Coefficients. Med Decis Making 2019; 39:661-672. [PMID: 31423898 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x19866296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background. Cluster randomized trials are important sources of information on evidence-based practices in primary care. However, there are few sources of intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) for designing such trials. We inventoried ICC estimates for shared decision-making (SDM) measures in primary care. Methods. Data sources were studies led by the Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Transition. Eligible studies were conducted in primary care, included at least 2 hierarchical levels, included SDM measures for individual units nested under any type of cluster (area, clinic, or provider), and were approved by an ethics committee. We classified measures into decision antecedents, decision processes, and decision outcomes. We used Bayesian random-effect models to estimate mode ICCs and the 95% highest probability density interval (HPDI). We summarized estimates by calculating median and interquartile range (IQR). Results. Six of 14 studies were included. There were 97 ICC estimates for 17 measures. ICC estimates ranged from 0 to 0.5 (median, 0.03; IRQ, 0-0.07). They were higher for process measures (median, 0.03; IQR, 0-0.07) than for antecedent measures (0.02; 0-0.07) or outcome measures (0.02; 0-0.06), for which, respectively, "decisional conflict" (mode, 0.48; 95% HPDI, 0.39-0.57), "reluctance to disclose uncertainty to patients" (0.5; 0.11-0.89), and "quality of the decision" (0.45; 0.14-0.84) had the highest ICCs. ICCs for provider-level clustering (median, 0.06; IQR, 0-0.13) were higher than for other levels. Limitations. This convenience sample of studies may not reflect all potential ICC ranges for primary care SDM measures. Conclusions. Our inventory of ICC estimates for SDM measures in primary care will improve the ease and accuracy of power calculations in cluster randomized trials and inspire its further expansion in SDM contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ben Charif
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Jordie Croteau
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Rhéda Adekpedjou
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Evehouenou Lionel Adisso
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Health and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Haesebaert J, Adekpedjou R, Croteau J, Robitaille H, Légaré F. Shared decision-making experienced by Canadians facing health care decisions: a Web-based survey. CMAJ Open 2019; 7:E210-E216. [PMID: 30948650 PMCID: PMC6450794 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20180202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite health policy that promotes shared decision-making, it is not yet the norm in clinical practice. We aimed to assess how much shared decision-making Canadians experienced in health-related decisions in 2017. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional online survey in January 2018 with a Web-based panel of Canadians representing all 10 provinces. We assessed their involvement in health-related decisions made with a health care professional over the previous year by asking about 1) discussion of choice of treatment or care plan, 2) presentation of advantages and disadvantages, 3) exploration of ideas and preferences, 4) discussion of preferred option and 5) match between preferred and actual level of participation. We computed an average shared decision-making score (range 1 [never] to 5 [always]). We presented characteristics of participants and responses using descriptive statistics and explored variations across sociodemographic factors, jurisdictions, geographical areas and care settings (home care or not) using multivariate weighted regressions. RESULTS Of the 1591 participants surveyed, 1010 (63.5%) reported receiving health care in the previous 12 months. The mean of the average shared decision-making score was 2.25/5 (standard deviation [SD] 1.16). After weighting, 42.8% of respondents reported that their health care professional often or always mentioned that they had a choice of treatment or care plan, 45.4% reported that advantages and disadvantages were often or always presented, 38.8% reported that they were often or always asked for their ideas or preferences, 40.2% reported that they were often or always asked about their preferred option, and 54.1% stated that their level of participation in decision-making often or always matched their preferred level of participation. Increasing age, rural setting, living in the province of Quebec and not being white significantly decreased the level of shared decision-making experienced. Older respondents (age ≥ 65 yr) receiving home care reported the least shared decision-making (mean score 1.7 [SD 0.5]). INTERPRETATION Canadians in all 10 provinces experienced a low degree of shared decision-making in 2017, with variations across sociodemographic factors, jurisdictions, care settings and geographical areas. Further efforts to foster implementation of shared decision-making are needed and should take these variations into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Haesebaert
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, and Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Rhéda Adekpedjou
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, and Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Jordie Croteau
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, and Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - Hubert Robitaille
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, and Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Que
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, and Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Que.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Savelberg W, Boersma LJ, Smidt M, Goossens MFJ, Hermanns R, van der Weijden T. Does lack of deeper understanding of shared decision making explains the suboptimal performance on crucial parts of it? An example from breast cancer care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2019; 38:92-97. [PMID: 30717943 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although most of the clinicians in breast cancer care seem to approve of shared decision making (SDM), actual implementation is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences, issues and concerns of early-adopter professionals with regards to shared decision making. METHODS This qualitative descriptive study was part of a pilot study aimed at implementing SDM in breast cancer teams. We interviewed 27 clinicians; 9 breast cancer surgeons, 11 nurse practitioners and 7 nurses. The teams were exposed to a multifaceted implementation programme, among others: a patient decision aid (PtDA), a procedure to disseminate the PtDA and advice on redesigning the clinical pathway. RESULTS Participants considered SDM, including the delivery of the PtDA, to be a team effort, in which every professional should take responsibility. Most clinicians primarily focused on the first steps of SDM ignoring preference and decision talk. The remaining steps, like the uptake of the PtDA in the clinical pathway, were regarded as challenging, with surgeons, intentionally or unconsciously, delegating this responsibility to nurses. One barrier to successfully implementing SDM seems to lie in the fact that clinicians were unaware of their lack of competency regarding SDM. CONCLUSIONS A deeper understanding is needed among clinicians of what SDM actually is and how a PtDA contributes to this process. Nurses play an important role in the delivery of the PtDA, but their role is not clearly defined. Teams should consider a clear realignment of tasks between surgeons and nurses, which implies redesign of the pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Savelberg
- Department of Quality and Safety, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - L J Boersma
- Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Radiotherapy (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Dr. Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - M Smidt
- Oncology Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - M F J Goossens
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - R Hermanns
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - T van der Weijden
- School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Debeyeplein 1, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Garvelink MM, Jones CA, Archambault PM, Roy N, Blair L, Légaré F. Deciding How to Stay Independent at Home in Later Years: Development and Acceptability Testing of an Informative Web-Based Module. JMIR Hum Factors 2017; 4:e32. [PMID: 29242178 PMCID: PMC5746619 DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.8387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Seniors with loss of autonomy may face decisions about whether they should stay at home or move elsewhere. Most seniors would prefer to stay home and be independent for as long as possible, but most are unaware of options that would make this possible. Objective The study aimed to develop and test the acceptability of an interactive website for seniors, their caregivers, and health professionals with short interlinked videos presenting information about options for staying independent at home. Methods The approach for design and data collection varied, involving a multipronged, user-centered design of the development process, qualitative interviews, and end-user feedback to determine content (ie, needs assessment) in phase I; module development (in English and French) in phase II; and survey to test usability and acceptability with end users in phase III. Phase I participants were a convenience sample of end users, that is, seniors, caregivers, and professionals with expertise in modifiable factors (eg, day centers, home redesign, equipment, community activities, and finances), enabling seniors to stay independent at home for longer in Quebec and Alberta, Canada. Phase II participants were bilingual actors; phase III participants included phase I participants and new participants recruited through snowballing. Qualitative interviews were thematically analyzed in phase II to determine relevant topics for the video-scripts, which were user-checked by interview participants. In phase III, the results of a usability questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results In phase I, interviews with 29 stakeholders, including 4 seniors, 3 caregivers, and 22 professionals, showed a need for a one-stop information resource about options for staying independent at home. They raised issues relating to 6 categories: cognitive autonomy, psychological or mental well-being, functional autonomy, social autonomy, financial autonomy, and people involved. A script was developed and evaluated by participants. In phase II, after 4 days in a studio with 15 bilingual actors, 30 videos were made of various experts (eg, family doctor, home care nurse, and social worker) presenting options and guidance for the decision-making process. These were integrated into an interactive website, which included a comments tool for visitors to add information. In phase III (n=21), 8 seniors (7 women, mean age 75 years), 7 caregivers, and 6 professionals evaluated the acceptability of the module and suggested improvements. Clarity of the videos scored 3.6 out of 4, length was considered right by 17 (separate videos) and 13 participants (all videos together), and 18 participants considered the module acceptable. They suggested that information should be tailored more, and that seniors may need someone to help navigate it. Conclusions Our interactive website with interlinked videos presenting information about options for staying independent at home was deemed acceptable and potentially helpful by a diverse group of stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Marjolein Garvelink
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - C Allyson Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Patrick M Archambault
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec City, QC, Canada.,Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, Centre hospitalier affilié universitaire Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Lévis, QC, Canada.,Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.,Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Noémie Roy
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec City, QC, Canada.,School of Architecture, Faculty of Planning, Architecture, Arts and Design, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Louisa Blair
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec City, QC, Canada.,Population Health and Optimal Health Practice Research Unit, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bujold M, Pluye P, Légaré F, Haggerty J, Gore GC, Sherif RE, Poitras MÈ, Beaulieu MC, Beaulieu MD, Bush PL, Couturier Y, Débarges B, Gagnon J, Giguère A, Grad R, Granikov V, Goulet S, Hudon C, Kremer B, Kröger E, Kudrina I, Lebouché B, Loignon C, Lussier MT, Martello C, Nguyen Q, Pratt R, Rihoux B, Rosenberg E, Samson I, Senn N, Li Tang D, Tsujimoto M, Vedel I, Ventelou B, Wensing M. Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016400. [PMID: 29133314 PMCID: PMC5695438 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) often suffer from combinations of multiple chronic conditions, mental health problems, drug interactions and social vulnerability, which can lead to healthcare services overuse, underuse or misuse. Typically, PCCNs face interactional issues and unmet decisional needs regarding possible options in a cascade of interrelated decisions involving different stakeholders (themselves, their families, their caregivers, their healthcare practitioners). Gaps in knowledge, values clarification and social support in situations where options need to be deliberated hamper effective decision support interventions. This review aims to (1) assess decisional needs of PCCNs from the perspective of stakeholders, (2) build a taxonomy of these decisional needs and (3) prioritise decisional needs with knowledge users (clinicians, patients and managers). METHODS AND ANALYSIS This review will be based on the interprofessional shared decision making (IP-SDM) model and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Applying a participatory research approach, we will identify potentially relevant studies through a comprehensive literature search; select relevant ones using eligibility criteria inspired from our previous scoping review on PCCNs; appraise quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; conduct a three-step synthesis (sequential exploratory mixed methods design) to build taxonomy of key decisional needs; and integrate these results with those of a parallel PCCNs' qualitative decisional need assessment (semistructured interviews and focus group with stakeholders). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This systematic review, together with the qualitative study (approved by the Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Service Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean ethical committee), will produce a working taxonomy of key decisional needs (ontological contribution), to inform the subsequent user-centred design of a support tool for addressing PCCNs' decisional needs (practical contribution). We will adapt the IP-SDM model, normally dealing with a single decision, for PCCNs who experience cascade of decisions involving different stakeholders (theoretical contribution). Knowledge users will facilitate dissemination of the results in the Canadian primary care network. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42015020558.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Bujold
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pierre Pluye
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jeannie Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Reem El Sherif
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie-Ève Poitras
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Paula L Bush
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Yves Couturier
- École de travail social, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
| | | | - Justin Gagnon
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Anik Giguère
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Roland Grad
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Vera Granikov
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Serge Goulet
- Department of Family Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Catherine Hudon
- Department of Family Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada
| | | | | | - Irina Kudrina
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Bertrand Lebouché
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Cristiano Martello
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Quynh Nguyen
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Rebekah Pratt
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
| | - Benoit Rihoux
- Centre de Science Politique et de Politique Comparée, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
| | - Ellen Rosenberg
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Samson
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - David Li Tang
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Isabelle Vedel
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|