1
|
Jneid H, Chikwe J, Arnold SV, Bonow RO, Bradley SM, Chen EP, Diekemper RL, Fugar S, Johnston DR, Kumbhani DJ, Mehran R, Misra A, Patel MR, Sweis RN, Szerlip M. 2024 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Valvular and Structural Heart Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Performance Measures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 83:1579-1613. [PMID: 38493389 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
|
2
|
Jneid H, Chikwe J, Arnold SV, Bonow RO, Bradley SM, Chen EP, Diekemper RL, Fugar S, Johnston DR, Kumbhani DJ, Mehran R, Misra A, Patel MR, Sweis RN, Szerlip M. 2024 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With Valvular and Structural Heart Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Performance Measures. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2024; 17:e000129. [PMID: 38484039 DOI: 10.1161/hcq.0000000000000129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Hani Jneid
- ACC/AHA Joint Committee on Clinical Data Standards liaison
- Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions representative
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iyer V, Faza NN, Pfeiffer M, Kozak M, Peterson B, Wyler von Ballmoos M, Mollenkopf S, Mancilla M, Latibeaudiere-Gardner D, Reardon MJ. Understanding Treatment Preferences for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation. MDM Policy Pract 2024; 9:23814683231225667. [PMID: 38250668 PMCID: PMC10798093 DOI: 10.1177/23814683231225667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background. Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a high-prevalence disease associated with poor quality of life and mortality. This quantitative patient preference study aims to identify TR patients' perspectives on risk-benefit tradeoffs. Methods. A discrete-choice experiment was developed to explore TR treatment risk-benefit tradeoffs. Attributes (levels) tested were treatment (procedure, medical management), reintervention risk (0%, 1%, 5%, 10%), medications over 2 y (none, reduce, same, increase), shortness of breath (none/mild, moderate, severe), and swelling (never, 3× per week, daily). A mixed logit regression model estimated preferences and calculated predicted probabilities. Relative attribute importance was calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Results. An online survey was completed by 150 TR patients. Shortness of breath was the most important attribute and accounted for 65.8% of treatment decision making. The average patients' predicted probability of preferring a "procedure-like" profile over a "medical management-like" profile was 99.7%. This decreased to 78.9% for a level change from severe to moderate in shortness of breath in the "medical management-like" profile. Subgroup analysis confirmed that patients older than 64 y had a stronger preference to avoid severe shortness of breath compared with younger patients (P < 0.02), as did severe or worse TR patients relative to moderate. New York Heart Association class I/II patients more strongly preferred to avoid procedural reintervention risk relative to class III/IV patients (P < 0.03). Conclusion. TR patients are willing to accept higher procedural reintervention risk if shortness of breath is alleviated. This risk tolerance is higher for older and more symptomatic patients. These results emphasize the appropriateness of developing TR therapies and the importance of addressing symptom burden. Highlights This study provides quantitative patient preference data from clinically confirmed tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients to understand their treatment preferences.Using a targeted literature search and patient, physician, and Food and Drug Administration feedback, a cross-sectional survey with a discrete-choice experiment that focused on 5 of the most important attributes to TR patients was developed and administered online.TR patients are willing to accept higher procedural reintervention risk if shortness of breath is alleviated, and this risk tolerance is higher for older and more symptomatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Iyer
- Division of Cardiology, Buffalo General Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Nadeen N. Faza
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Pfeiffer
- Division of Cardiology, Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Mark Kozak
- Division of Cardiology, Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Brandon Peterson
- Division of Cardiology, Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael J. Reardon
- Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brocki BC, Andreasen JJ, Aarøe J, Andreasen J, Thorup CB. Exercise-based real-time telerehabilitation for older patients recently discharged after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An extended feasibility study. J Geriatr Cardiol 2023; 20:767-778. [PMID: 38098465 PMCID: PMC10716611 DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the extended feasibility of a telerehabilitation program and its effects on physical performance in older adults who have recently undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS In this single-center feasibility study, patients underwent an eight-week telerehabilitation program, involving web-based home exercise training twice weekly, an activity tracker, access to an informative website, and one online session with a nurse, starting one-week postoperative. Data collection was performed before surgery and three months postoperative. The feasibility of the intervention was based on recruitment and adherence to the program. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the change in six-minute walk distance from before surgery to three months postoperative. RESULTS Forty-one patients scheduled for TAVI were assessed for eligibility; 15 patients (37%) were enrolled. Of these, eight were excluded after surgery due to tiredness (n = 2), non-cardiac related hospital readmission (n = 2), fluctuating health (n = 1), death during hospital stay (n = 1), and reduced cognition (n = 2). Seven patients completed the eight-week web-based intervention and were evaluated three months postoperative. Their median (IQR) age was 83 [81, 87] years, and the sample comprised three men and four women. Their walked distance improved from median (IQR) 262 [199, 463] before surgery, to 381 [267, 521] meters three months postoperative. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION Web-based telerehabilitation, including supervised exercise training, in older adults who have recently undergone TAVI was feasible for a small number of patients who completed the eight-week intervention. This was reflected in an improvement in their walked distance three months after the surgery. However, the low recruitment and retention rates do question the overall feasibility of this intervention in a frail, older population of post-TAVI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Jesper Andreasen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital and Clinical Institute, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Jens Aarøe
- Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jane Andreasen
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Health, Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Charlotte B Thorup
- Research Center of Health and Applied Technology, University College Northern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schulz S, Harzheim L, Hübner C, Lorke M, Jünger S, Woopen C. Patient-centered empirical research on ethically relevant psychosocial and cultural aspects of cochlear, glaucoma and cardiovascular implants - a scoping review. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:68. [PMID: 37641094 PMCID: PMC10464431 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00945-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The significance of medical implants goes beyond technical functioning and reaches into everyday life, with consequences for individuals as well as society. Ethical aspects associated with the everyday use of implants are relevant for individuals' lifeworlds and need to be considered in implant care and in the course of technical developments. METHODS This scoping review aimed to provide a synthesis of the existing evidence regarding ethically relevant psychosocial and cultural aspects in cochlear, glaucoma and cardiovascular implants in patient-centered empirical research. Systematic literature searches were conducted in EBSCOhost, Philpapers, PsycNET, Pubmed, Web of Science and BELIT databases. Eligible studies were articles in German or English language published since 2000 dealing with ethically relevant aspects of cochlear, glaucoma and passive cardiovascular implants based on empirical findings from the perspective of (prospective) implant-wearers and their significant others. Following a descriptive-analytical approach, a data extraction form was developed and relevant data were extracted accordingly. We combined a basic numerical analysis of study characteristics with a thematically organized narrative synthesis of the data. RESULTS Sixty-nine studies were included in the present analysis. Fifty were in the field of cochlear implants, sixteen in the field of passive cardiovascular implants and three in the field of glaucoma implants. Implant-related aspects were mainly found in connection with autonomy, freedom, identity, participation and justice, whereas little to no data was found with regards to ethical principles of privacy, safety or sustainability. CONCLUSIONS Empirical research on ethical aspects of implant use in everyday life is highly relevant, but marked by ambiguity and unclarity in the operationalization of ethical terms and contextualization. A transparent orientation framework for the exploration and acknowledgment of ethical aspects in "lived experiences" may contribute to the improvement of individual care, healthcare programs and research quality in this area. Ethics-sensitive care requires creating awareness for cultural and identity-related issues, promoting health literacy to strengthen patient autonomy as well as adjusting healthcare programs accordingly. More consideration needs to be given to sustainability issues in implant development and care according to an approach of ethics-by-design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Schulz
- Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Universitätsstraße 91, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Laura Harzheim
- Cologne Center for Ethics, Rights, Economics, and Social Sciences of Health (CERES), University of Cologne and University Hospital of Cologne, Universitätsstraße 91, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Constanze Hübner
- Center for Life Ethics, University of Bonn, 53113, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mariya Lorke
- Faculty of Engineering and Mathematics, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSBI), 33619, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Saskia Jünger
- Department of Community Health, University of Applied Health Sciences Bochum, Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801, Bochum, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Col NF, Otero D, Lindman BR, Horne A, Levack MM, Ngo L, Goodloe K, Strong S, Kaplan E, Beaudry M, Coylewright M. What matters most to patients with severe aortic stenosis when choosing treatment? Framing the conversation for shared decision making. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270209. [PMID: 35951553 PMCID: PMC9371337 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Guidelines recommend including the patient’s values and preferences when choosing treatment for severe aortic stenosis (sAS). However, little is known about what matters most to patients as they develop treatment preferences. Our objective was to identify, prioritize, and organize patient-reported goals and features of treatment for sAS.
Methods
This multi-center mixed-methods study conducted structured focus groups using the nominal group technique to identify patients’ most important treatment goals and features. Patients separately rated and grouped those items using card sorting techniques. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses generated a cognitive map and clusters.
Results
51 adults with sAS and 3 caregivers with experience choosing treatment (age 36–92 years) were included. Participants were referred from multiple health centers across the U.S. and online. Eight nominal group meetings generated 32 unique treatment goals and 46 treatment features, which were grouped into 10 clusters of goals and 11 clusters of features. The most important clusters were: 1) trust in the healthcare team, 2) having good information about options, and 3) long-term outlook. Other clusters addressed the need for and urgency of treatment, being independent and active, overall health, quality of life, family and friends, recovery, homecare, and the process of decision-making.
Conclusions
These patient-reported items addressed the impact of the treatment decision on the lives of patients and their families from the time of decision-making through recovery, homecare, and beyond. Many attributes had not been previously reported for sAS. The goals and features that patients’ value, and the relative importance that they attach to them, differ from those reported in clinical trials and vary substantially from one individual to another. These findings are being used to design a shared decision-making tool to help patients and their clinicians choose a treatment that aligns with the patients’ priorities.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, Trial ID: NCT04755426, Trial URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04755426.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nananda F. Col
- Shared Decision Making Resources, Georgetown, ME and University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Diana Otero
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Brian R. Lindman
- Structural Heart and Valve Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Aaron Horne
- HeartCare Specialists, Medical City North Hills, North Richland Hills, Texas, United States of America
| | - Melissa M. Levack
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Long Ngo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Kimberly Goodloe
- American Heart Association Ambassador, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Susan Strong
- Heart Valve Voice US, Washington DC, United States of America
| | - Elvin Kaplan
- Patient Collaborator, Brownsville, Vermont, United States of America
| | - Melissa Beaudry
- Central Vermont Medical Center, Berlin, Vermont, United States of America
| | - Megan Coylewright
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Erlanger Heart and Lung Institute, Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brocki BC, Andreasen JJ, Aaroe J, Andreasen J, Thorup CB. Exercise-Based Real-time Telerehabilitation for Older Adult Patients Recently Discharged After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2022; 9:e34819. [PMID: 35471263 PMCID: PMC9092235 DOI: 10.2196/34819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of telehealth technology to improve functional recovery following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE In this study, we aimed to examine the feasibility of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation after TAVI. METHODS This was a single-center, prospective, nonrandomized study using a mixed methods approach. Data collection included testing, researchers' observations, logbooks, and individual patient interviews, which were analyzed using a content analysis approach. The intervention lasted 3 weeks and consisted of home-based web-based exercise training, an activity tracker, a TAVI information website, and 1 web-based session with a nurse. RESULTS Of the initially included 13 patients, 5 (40%) completed the study and were interviewed; the median age was 82 (range 74-84) years, and the sample comprised 3 men and 2 women. Easy access to supervised exercise training at home with real-time feedback and use of the activity tracker to count daily steps were emphasized by the patients who completed the intervention. Reasons for patients not completing the program included poor data coverage, participants' limited information technology skills, and a lack of functionality in the systems used. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS Exercise-based telerehabilitation for older people after TAVI, in the population as included in this study, and delivered as a web-based intervention, does not seem feasible, as 60% (8/13) of patients did not complete the study. Those completing the intervention highly appreciated the real-time feedback during the web-based training sessions. Future studies should address aspects that support retention rates and enhance patients' information technology skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Cristina Brocki
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jan Jesper Andreasen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital and Clinical Institute, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jens Aaroe
- Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jane Andreasen
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Brun Thorup
- Clinic of Anesthesiology, Child Disease, Circulation and Women, Clinical Nursing Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saeed S, Skaar E, Romarheim A, Chambers JB, Bleie Ø. Shared Decision-Making and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Valvular Heart Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:863040. [PMID: 35463777 PMCID: PMC9024058 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.863040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-centered health care emphasizes shared decision-making (SDM), incorporating both clinical evidence and patient preferences and values. SDM is important in heart valve disease, both because there might be more than one treatment option and due to the importance of adherence after intervention. We aimed to describe patient information and involvement in decision-making about care and recording of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in valve interventions. The opinion piece and recommendations are based upon literature review and our own experience from specialist valve clinics. Before a valve intervention, adequate patient information, discussion of the various treatment options and exploring patient preferences, in line with the concept of SDM, may improve post-intervention quality of life. After intervention, patients with prosthetic heart valves require adequate counseling and close follow-up to make them more confident and competent to manage their own health, as well as to maintain the efficacy of treatment provided. PROMs inform SDM before and improve care after valve intervention, focusing on outcomes beyond mortality and morbidity. SDM may improve post-intervention quality of life. Formal PROMs questionnaires inform SDM, quantify patient centered changes and should be used more often in clinical practice and research. A thorough assessment of baseline frailty status in patients scheduled for valve intervention is essential and may affect postoperative outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahrai Saeed
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- *Correspondence: Sahrai Saeed
| | - Elisabeth Skaar
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Andrea Romarheim
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - John B. Chambers
- Cardiothoracic Centre, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Øyvind Bleie
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robbins AJ, Grande SW, Alwan F, Soule MR, Raveendran G, Helmer G, Andrade R, Perry T. Physicians' perspectives and attitudes toward surgical bailout in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JTCVS OPEN 2022; 9:74-81. [PMID: 36003484 PMCID: PMC9390286 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The incidence of surgical bailout during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is ∼1%, with an associated 50% in-hospital mortality. We performed an exploratory qualitative study of TAVR team perceptions regarding routine surgical bailout planning with patients. METHODS We developed a semistructed interview guide to explore clinician perspectives on the TAVR consent process, managing intraoperative emergencies, and involving patients in surgical contingency planning. We interviewed surgeons, cardiologists, and anesthesiologists involved with TAVR in 4 hospitals. We performed qualitative thematic analysis via independent coding of salient quotations from the transcribed texts. Codes were categorized based on shared meaning and the final themes were derived by identifying key content, and examining its relational nature. RESULTS Thirteen interviews were conducted, identifying 4 major themes. Participants agreed that eliciting patient preference for bailout is crucial, particularly when surgical outcome is ambiguous. In those cases, participants offered criteria for determining which patients should be engaged in a more nuanced discussion. The ethos of specialty clinicians impacted anticipation and response to procedural emergencies. Finally, physician attitudes reflected strong emotional responses to patient death/morbidity, particularly in iatrogenic injury. Participants expressed anxiety with performing TAVR without surgical backup, while also demonstrating willingness to respect patients' wishes. CONCLUSIONS The TAVR team supports engaging patients regarding potential surgical bailout and honoring their preferences in the event of complication. However, clinical judgment about the expected outcome of bailout would frame that discussion. Participants described the emotional weight of not pursuing bailout if indicated and the importance of good coping mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandria J. Robbins
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minn
- Hospice and Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minn
| | - Stuart W. Grande
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minn
| | - Fatima Alwan
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minn
| | - Matthew R. Soule
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minn
| | - Ganesh Raveendran
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minn
| | - Gregory Helmer
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minn
| | - Rafael Andrade
- Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minn
| | - Tjorvi Perry
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minn
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thorup CB, Villadsen A, Andreasen JJ, Aarøe J, Andreasen J, Brocki BC. Patient and health professional perspectives on participations in a feasibility study on exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A qualitative study. (Preprint). JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e35365. [PMID: 35723925 PMCID: PMC9253976 DOI: 10.2196/35365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aortic valve stenosis affects approximately half of people aged ≥85 years, and the recommended surgical treatment for older patients is transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Despite strong evidence for its advantages, low attendance rate in cardiac rehabilitation is observed among patients after TAVI. Cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) has proven comparable with center-based rehabilitation; however, no study has investigated CTR targeting patients after TAVI. On the basis of participatory design, an exercise-based CTR program (TeleTAVI) was developed, which included a web-based session with a cardiac nurse, a tablet containing an informative website, an activity tracker, and supervised home-based exercise sessions that follow the national recommendations for cardiac rehabilitation. Objective This study aims to explore patients’ and health professionals’ experiences with using health technologies and participating in the exercise-based CTR program, TeleTAVI. Methods This study is a part of a feasibility study and will only report patients’ and health professionals’ experiences of being a part of TeleTAVI. A total of 11 qualitative interviews were conducted using a semistructured interview guide (n=7, 64% patients and n=4, 36% health professionals). Patient interviews were conducted after 8 weeks of participation in TeleTAVI, and interviews with health professionals were conducted after the end of the program. The analysis was conducted as inductive content analysis to create a condensed meaning presented as themes. Results Reticence toward using the website was evident with reduced curiosity to explore it, and reduced benefit from using the activity tracker was observed, as the patients’ technical competencies were challenged. This was also found when using the tablet for web-based training sessions, leading to patients feeling worried before the training, as they anticipated technical problems. Disadvantages of the TeleTAVI program were technical problems and inability to use hands-on guidance with the patients. However, both physiotherapists and patients reported a feeling of improvement in patients’ physical fitness. The home training created a feeling of safety, supported adherence, and made individualization possible, which the patients valued. A good relationship and continuity in the contact with health professionals seemed very important for the patients and affected their positive attitude toward the program. Conclusions The home-based nature of the TeleTAVI program seems to provide the opportunity to support individualization, autonomy, independence, and adherence to physical training in addition to improvement in physical capability in older patients. Despite technological challenges, basing the relationship between the health professionals and patients on continuity may be beneficial for patients. Prehabilitation may also be considered, as it may create familiarity toward technology and adherence to the training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Brun Thorup
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anne Villadsen
- Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jan Jesper Andreasen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Clinical Institute, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jens Aarøe
- Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jane Andreasen
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Barbara Cristina Brocki
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Porat A, Gordon M, Perlman G, Planer D, Danenberg H, Alcalai R, Leibowitz D. Mass to voltage ratio index predicts mortality following TAVI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 99:1918-1924. [PMID: 35119184 PMCID: PMC9544118 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is commonly performed in elderly patients with aortic stenosis. Better methods of risk stratification are needed in this population with high morbidity. There is a relatively high incidence of cardiac amyloidosis in this population and high LV mass index (LVMI) to QRS voltage may help identify patients with worse prognosis following TAVI. This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent TAVI in our institution between the years 2008-2019. Mass voltage ratio index (MVRi) was calculated as the ratio of LV mass index on echocardiogram to voltage using the Sokolow-Lyon criteria on 12 lead ECG performed within 3 months before the intervention. Two hundred and fifty-one patients (mean age 80.8 years, 49% men) were enrolled. One hundred and sixty-eight (67%) patients were alive at 3 years follow up. MVRi was a statistically significant predictor of 3 year mortality (p < 0.005). Patients were divided categorically into tertiles based on MVRi score; the "high" group had significantly higher 3-year mortality (p < 0.001). In the multivariate model only Euroscore (p < 0.009) and MVRi (p < 0.011; OR: 2.32; CI: 1.15-4.964) were statistically significant predictors of mortality. The "high" group had a significantly lower survival rate after 3 years follow up on Kaplan-Meier analysis (p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that MVRi is a strong, independent predictor of increased post-TAVI mortality. This may be a simple clinical tool to assist in the assessment of patients prior to before TAVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alon Porat
- Department of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Max Gordon
- Department of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gidon Perlman
- Department of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David Planer
- Department of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Haim Danenberg
- Department of Cardiology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel
| | - Ronny Alcalai
- Department of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David Leibowitz
- Department of Cardiology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Evaluating Medical Therapy for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78:2354-2376. [PMID: 34857095 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite numerous promising therapeutic targets, there are no proven medical treatments for calcific aortic stenosis (AS). Multiple stakeholders need to come together and several scientific, operational, and trial design challenges must be addressed to capitalize on the recent and emerging mechanistic insights into this prevalent heart valve disease. This review briefly discusses the pathobiology and most promising pharmacologic targets, screening, diagnosis and progression of AS, identification of subgroups that should be targeted in clinical trials, and the need to elicit the patient voice earlier rather than later in clinical trial design and implementation. Potential trial end points and tools for assessment and approaches to implementation and design of clinical trials are reviewed. The efficiencies and advantages offered by a clinical trial network and platform trial approach are highlighted. The objective is to provide practical guidance that will facilitate a series of trials to identify effective medical therapies for AS resulting in expansion of therapeutic options to complement mechanical solutions for late-stage disease.
Collapse
|
13
|
2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 162:e183-e353. [PMID: 33972115 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
14
|
Tam DY, Miranda RN, Elbatarny M, Wijeysundera HC. Real-World Health-Economic Considerations Around Aortic-Valve Replacement in a Publicly Funded Health System. Can J Cardiol 2021; 37:992-1003. [PMID: 33940193 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Herein, we describe the unique interplay among biomedical ethics, principles of distributive justice, and economic theory to highlight the role of health technology assessments to compare therapeutic options for aortic valve replacement. From the perspective of the Canadian health care system, transcatheter aortic-valve implantation is associated with higher costs but also higher incremental health benefits compared with surgical aortic-valve replacement. At current willingness to pay thresholds, transcatheter aortic-valve replacement is likely cost effective across the spectrum of risk, from inoperable patients to those at low surgical risk. However, we highlight the nuances within each subgroup of surgical risk that merit careful consideration by the heart team. Moreover, incorporation of patients and their preferences in decision-making is key. In particular, in young, low-risk patients, there remains uncertainty regarding the optimal treatment, with unique concerns around valve durability, selection of valve prosthesis, and consideration for special procedures such as the Ross procedure. Nonetheless, current research suggests that, universally, patients prefer a less invasive approach compared with a more invasive approach. Finally, we highlight that there remain critical issues around timeliness of access to care and unacceptable geographic inequities across Canada. Further research into alternative funding mechanisms and integrated cross-sector care pathways is necessary to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derrick Y Tam
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rafael Neves Miranda
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Malak Elbatarny
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harindra C Wijeysundera
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Heen AF, Lytvyn L, Shapiro M, Guyatt GH, Siemieniuk RAC, Zhang Y, Manja V, Vandvik PO, Agoritsas T. Patient values and preferences on valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a systematic review. Heart 2021; 107:1289-1295. [PMID: 33563630 PMCID: PMC8327404 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The review aims to summarise evidence addressing patients’ values, preferences and practical issues on deciding between transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for aortic stenosis. We searched databases and grey literature until June 2020. We included studies of adults with aortic stenosis eliciting values and preferences about treatment, excluding medical management or palliative care. Qualitative findings were synthesised using thematic analysis, and quantitative findings were narratively described. Evidence certainty was assessed using CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). We included eight studies. Findings ranged from low to very low certainty. Most studies only addressed TAVI. Studies addressing both TAVI and SAVR reported on factors affecting patients’ decision-making along with treatment effectiveness, instead of trade-offs between procedures. Willingness to accept risk varied considerably. To improve their health status, participants were willing to accept higher mortality risk than current evidence suggests for either procedure. No study explicitly addressed valve reintervention, and one study reported variability in willingness to accept shorter duration of known effectiveness of TAVI compared with SAVR. The most common themes were desire for symptom relief and improved function. Participants preferred minimally invasive procedures with shorter hospital stay and recovery. The current body of evidence on patients’ values, preferences and practical issues related to aortic stenosis management is of suboptimal rigour and reports widely disparate results regarding patients’ perceptions. These findings emphasise the need for higher quality studies to inform clinical practice guidelines and the central importance of shared decision-making to individualise care fitted to each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Fog Heen
- Department of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust Gjøvik Hospital, Brumunddal, Norway
| | - Lyubov Lytvyn
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Gordon Henry Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Veena Manja
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.,Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, Mather, California, USA
| | - Per Olav Vandvik
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Agoritsas
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM, Thompson A, Toly C. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021; 143:e72-e227. [PMID: 33332150 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 522] [Impact Index Per Article: 174.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
17
|
Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM, Thompson A, Toly C. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77:e25-e197. [PMID: 33342586 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 721] [Impact Index Per Article: 240.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
18
|
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment. ONTARIO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SERIES 2020; 20:1-148. [PMID: 33240455 PMCID: PMC7670297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the conventional treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive procedure. We conducted a health technology assessment (HTA) of TAVI for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding TAVI, and patient preferences and values. METHODS We used the 2016 Health Quality Ontario HTA on TAVI2 as a source of eligible studies and performed a systematic literature search for studies published since the 2016 review. Eligible primary studies identified both through the 2016 HTA and through our complementary literature search were used in a de novo analysis. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria.An applicable, previously conducted cost-effectiveness analysis was available, so we did not conduct a primary economic evaluation. We analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding TAVI in people at low surgical risk in Ontario. We also performed a literature survey of the quantitative evidence of preferences and values of patients for TAVI. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) conducted a review to evaluate the qualitative literature on patient and provider preferences and values for TAVI. To contextualize the potential value of TAVI, we spoke with people with severe aortic valve stenosis. RESULTS We identified two randomized controlled trials that compared TAVI (transfemoral route) and SAVR in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk. Both studies have an ongoing follow-up of 10 years, but 1-year and limited 2-year follow-up results are currently available. At 30 days, compared with SAVR, TAVI had a slightly lower risk of mortality (risk difference -0.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.5% to -0.1%, GRADE: Moderate) and disabling stroke (risk difference -0.8%, 95% CI -1.8% to -0.2%, GRADE: Moderate), and resulted in more patients with symptom improvement (risk difference 11.8%, 95% CI 8.2% to 15.5%, GRADE: High) and in a greater improvement in quality of life (GRADE: High). At 1 year, TAVI and SAVR were similar with regard to mortality (GRADE: Low), although TAVI may result in a slightly lower risk of disabling stroke (GRADE: Moderate). Both TAVI and SAVR resulted in a similar improvement in symptoms and quality of life at 1 year (GRADE: Moderate). Compared with SAVR, TAVI had a higher risk of some complications and a lower risk of others.Device-related costs for TAVI (about $25,000) are higher than for SAVR (about $6,000). A published cost-effectiveness analysis conducted from an Ontario Ministry of Health perspective showed TAVI to be more expensive and, on average, slightly more effective (i.e., it was associated with more quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) than SAVR. Compared with SAVR, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $27,196 per QALY and $59,641 per QALY for balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVI, respectively. Balloon-expandable TAVI was less costly (by $2,330 on average) and slightly more effective (by 0.02 QALY on average) than self-expanding TAVI. Among the three interventions, balloon-expandable TAVI had the highest probability of being cost-effective. It was the preferred option in 53% and 59% of model iterations, at willingness-to-pay values of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY, respectively. Self-expanding TAVI was preferred in less than 10% of iterations. The budget impact of publicly funding TAVI in Ontario is estimated to be an additional $5 to $8 million each year for the next 5 years. The budget impact could be significantly reduced with reductions in the device price.We did not find any quantitative or qualitative evidence on patient preferences and values specific to the low-risk surgical group. Among a mixed or generally high-risk and population, people typically preferred the less invasive nature and the faster recovery time of TAVI compared with SAVR, and people were satisfied with the TAVI procedure. Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk and their caregivers perceived that TAVI minimized pain and recovery time. Most patients who had TAVI returned to their usual activities more quickly than they would have if they had had SAVR. Our direct patient and caregiver consultations indicated a preference for TAVI over SAVR. CONCLUSIONS Both TAVI (transfemoral route) and SAVR resulted in improved patient symptoms and quality of life during the 1 year of follow-up. The TAVI procedure is less invasive and resulted in greater symptom improvement and quality of life than SAVR 30 days after surgery. The TAVI procedure also resulted in a small improvement in mortality and disabling stroke at 30 days. At 1 year, TAVI and SAVR were similar with regard to mortality, although TAVI may result in a slightly lower risk of disabling stroke. According to the study authors, longer follow-up is needed to better understand how long TAVI valves last and to draw definitive conclusions on the long-term outcomes of TAVI compared with SAVR beyond 1 year.The TAVI procedure might be cost-effective for patients at low surgical risk; however, there is some uncertainty in this result. We estimated that the additional cost to provide public funding for TAVI in people with severe aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk would range from about $5 million to $8 million over the next 5 years.Among a mixed or generally high-risk population, people typically preferred the less invasive nature and the faster recovery time of TAVI compared with SAVR.
Collapse
|
19
|
A framework for practical issues was developed to inform shared decision-making tools and clinical guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 129:104-113. [PMID: 33049326 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to develop and test feasibility of a framework of patient-important practical issues. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Guidelines and shared decision-making tools help facilitate discussions about patient-important outcomes of care alternatives, but typically ignore practical issues patients consider when implementing care into their daily routines. Using grounded theory, practical issues in the HealthTalk.org registry and in Option Grids were identified and categorized into a framework. We integrated the framework into the MAGIC authoring and publication platform and digitally structured authoring and publication platform and appraised its use in The BMJ Rapid Recommendations. RESULTS The framework included the following 15 categories: medication routine, tests and visits, procedure and device, recovery and adaptation, coordination of care, adverse effects, interactions and antidote, physical well-being, emotional well-being, pregnancy and nursing, costs and access, food and drinks, exercise and activities, social life and relationships, work and education, travel and driving. Implementation in 15 BMJ Rapid Recommendations added 283 issues to 35 recommendations. The most frequently used category was procedure and device, and the least frequent was social life and relationship. CONCLUSION Adding practical issues systematically to evidence summaries is feasible and can inform guidelines and tools for shared decision-making. How this inclusion can improve patient-centered care remains to be determined.
Collapse
|
20
|
Meers JB, Townsley MM. Aortic Stenosis and Noncardiac Surgery in the Era of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:2234-2244. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
21
|
Onorati F, Quintana E, El-Dean Z, Perrotti A, Sponga S, Ruggieri VG, Rinaldi M, Milano AD, Santini F, Chocron S, Livi U, Salizzoni S, Loizzo T, Salsano A, Di Cesare A, Faggian G, Castella M, Nicolini F. Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Risk Patients: Preliminary Results From a Prospective Multicenter Registry. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:2091-2099. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.02.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
22
|
Mas-Peiro S, Fichtlscherer S, Walther C, Vasa-Nicotera M. Current issues in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:1665-1680. [PMID: 32395310 PMCID: PMC7212163 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.01.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease worldwide. With transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) being increasingly expanded to lower-risk populations, several challenging issues remain to be solved. The present review aims at discussing modern approaches to such issues as well as the current status of TAVR. TAVR has undergone several developments in the recent years: an increased use of transfemoral access, the development of prostheses in order to adapt to challenging anatomies, improved delivery systems with repositioning features, and outer skirts aiming at reducing paravalvular leak. The indication of TAVR is increasingly being expanded to patients with lower surgical risk. The main clinical trials supporting such expansion are reviewed and the latest data on low-risk patients are discussed. A number of challenges need still to be addressed and are also reviewed in this paper: the need for updated international guidelines including the latest evidence; a reduction of main complications such as permanent pacemaker implantation, paravalvular leak, and stroke (and its potential prevention by using anti-embolic protection devices); the appropriate role of TAVR in patients with concomitant cardiac ischemic disease; and durability of bio-prosthetic implanted valves. Finally, the future perspectives for TAVR use and next device developments are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Mas-Peiro
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research, DZHK, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Germany
| | - Stephan Fichtlscherer
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research, DZHK, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Germany
| | - Claudia Walther
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research, DZHK, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Germany
| | - Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research, DZHK, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van Beek-Peeters JJAM, van Noort EHM, Faes MC, de Vos AJBM, van Geldorp MWA, Minkman MMN, van der Meer NJM. Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review. Heart 2020; 106:647-655. [PMID: 32001621 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Revised: 11/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This review provides an overview of the status of shared decision making (SDM) in older patients regarding treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (SSAS). The databases Embase, Medline Ovid, Cinahl and Cochrane Dare were searched for relevant studies from January 2002 to May 2018 regarding perspectives of professionals, patients and caregivers; aspects of decision making; type of decision making; application of the six domains of SDM; barriers to and facilitators of SDM. The systematic search yielded 1842 articles, 15 studies were included. Experiences of professionals and informal caregivers with SDM were scarcely found. Patient refusal was a frequently reported result of decision making, but often no insight was given into the decision process. Most studies investigated the 'decision' and 'option' domains of SDM, yet no study took all six domains into account. Problem analysis, personalised treatment aims, use of decision aids and integrating patient goals in decisions lacked in all studies. Barriers to and facilitators of SDM were 'individualised formal and informal information support' and 'patients' opportunity to use their own knowledge about their health condition and preferences for SDM'. In conclusion, SDM is not yet common practice in the decision making process of older patients with SSAS. Moreover, the six domains of SDM are not often applied in this process. More knowledge is needed about the implementation of SDM in the context of SSAS treatment and how to involve patients, professionals and informal caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Miriam C Faes
- Department of Geriatrics, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mirella M N Minkman
- TIAS, School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Vilans, Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nardo J M van der Meer
- TIAS, School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Current guidelines for management of adults with aortic stenosis recommend aortic valve replacement for patients with clinical consequences due to hemodynamically severe valve obstruction. However, advances in surgical and transcatheter techniques, and improved valve design have led to decreased procedural risk and improved long-term outcomes. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is recommended for patients with prohibitive surgical risk and is reasonable in intermediate and high-risk patients. Recent trials demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes in patients with low surgical risk undergoing TAVR compared with surgical AVR. We review the current Guidelines recommendations and highlight key controversies in management due to evidence gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Harris
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Box 356422, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Philippe Pibarot
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumonologie de Québec (Québec Heart and Lung Institute), Laval University, 2725 Chemin Sainte Foy, Québec, QC G1V-4G5, Canada
| | - Catherine M Otto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, 1959 Northeast Pacific Street, Box 356422, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Blokzijl F, Houterman S, van Straten BHM, Daeter E, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Dieperink W, Reneman MF, Keus F, van der Horst ICC, Mariani MA. The impact of surgical aortic valve replacement on quality of life-a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 161:1204-1210.e7. [PMID: 31839233 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the effect of surgical aortic valve replacement on quality of life and the variance with age, particularly in patients at risk of deterioration. METHODS In an observational, multicenter, cohort study of routinely collected health data, patients undergoing and electively operated between January 2011 and January 2015 with pre- and postoperative quality of life data were included. Patients were classified into 3 age groups: <65, 65-79, and ≥80 years. Quality of life was measured at baseline and at 1-year follow-up using the Short-Form Health Survey-12 or SF-36. We defined a >5-point difference as a minimal clinically important difference. Multivariable linear regression analysis, with adjustment for confounders, was used to evaluate the association between age and quality of life. RESULTS In 899 patients, mean physical health increased from 55 to 66 and mental health from 60 to 66. A minimal clinically important decreased physical health was observed in 12% of patients aged <65 years, 16% of patients aged 65-79 years, and 22% of patients aged ≥80 years (P = .023). A decreased mental health was observed in 15% of patients aged <65 years, 22% of patients aged 65-79 years, and 24% aged ≥80 years (P = .030). Older age and a greater physical and mental score at baseline were associated with a decreased physical and mental quality of life (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Patients surviving surgical aortic valve replacement on average improve in physical and mental quality of life; nonetheless, with increasing age patients are at higher risk of experiencing a deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrike Blokzijl
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Bart H M van Straten
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Edgar Daeter
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willem Dieperink
- Department of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel F Reneman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Keus
- Department of Critical Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo A Mariani
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
T wave positivity in lead aVR is associated with mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 4:e55-e62. [PMID: 31211271 PMCID: PMC6549042 DOI: 10.5114/amsad.2019.84449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with increased comorbidity. Lead aVR in surface ECG has valuable information about prediction of mortality in many cardiovascular diseases. Our aim was to determine the relationship between ischemic changes in lead aVR and mortality in TAVI patients. Material and methods We retrospectively examined 86 patients with TAVI. The ST segment deviation in lead aVR (STaVR) and T wave polarity (TPaVR) on surface ECG were measured. The absolute values of TPaVR and STaVR were calculated. A ratio (TP/STaVR or vice versa) was obtained from the division of the larger absolute value by the smaller one. Results The patients were divided into two groups as living and deceased. The living group had 68 patients, and the deceased group had 18 patients. The number of positive TPaVR patients after TAVI, TPaVR after TAVI, and TP/STaVR ratio after TAVI were significantly higher in the deceased group. The deceased group had a significantly shorter aortic annulus-LMCA distance. Presence of positive TPaVR (OR = 8.765, 95% CI: 1.088–70.618, p = 0.041), aortic annulus-LMCA distance (for each 1 mm increase, OR = 0.306, 95% CI: 0.158–0.595, p < 0.001) and TP/STaVR ratio (for each 0.1 increase, OR = 1.966, 95% CI: 1.276–3.024, p = 0.002) were determined as independent predictors for mortality. Conclusions Ischemic changes in lead aVR may provide valuable information about mortality after TAVI.
Collapse
|
27
|
From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis. Med Sci (Basel) 2018; 6:medsci6040109. [PMID: 30501062 PMCID: PMC6313661 DOI: 10.3390/medsci6040109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Revised: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The launch of ‘Rapid Recommendations’ by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) group, in collaboration with Making GRADE the Irresistible Choice (MAGIC) and the British Medical Journal (BMJ), is a very interesting recent development in e-healthcare. Designed to respond quickly to developments that have created new decision situations, their first project resulted from the arrival of minimally invasive Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) as an alternative to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR), for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The interactive MAGIC decision aid that accompanies a Rapid Recommendation and is the main route to its clinical implementation, represents a major advance in e-health, for a cardiovascular decision in this case. However, it needs to go further in order to facilitate fully person-centred care, where the weighted preferences of the individual person are elicited at the point of decision, and transparently integrated with the best (most personalised) estimates of option performances, to produce personalised, preference-sensitive option evaluations. This can be achieved by inputting the collated GRADE evidence on the criteria relevant in the TAVI/SAVR choice into a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis-based decision support tool, generating a personalised, preference-sensitive opinion. A demonstration version of this add-on to the MAGIC aid, divested of recommendations, is available online as proof of method.
Collapse
|
28
|
Bagur R, Webb JG. Standardising definitions for bioprosthetic structural valve deterioration and failure: the European avant-garde. EUROINTERVENTION 2018; 13:e1744-e1747. [PMID: 29400280 DOI: 10.4244/eijv13i15a283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Bagur
- London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Methods to perform systematic reviews of patient preferences: a literature survey. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017; 17:166. [PMID: 29228914 PMCID: PMC5725984 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0448-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews are a commonly used research design in the medical field to synthesize study findings. At present-although several systematic reviews of patient preference studies are published-there is no clear guidance available for researchers to conduct this type of systematic review. The aim of our study was to learn the most current practice of conducting these systematic reviews by conducting a survey of the literature regarding reviews of quantitative patient preference studies. METHODS Our survey included systematic reviews of studies that used a stated quantitative preference design to elicit patient preferences. We identified eligible reviews through a search of the PubMed database. Two investigators with knowledge of the design of patient preference studies independently screened the titles and abstracts, and where needed, screened the full-text of the reviews to determine eligibility. We developed and pilot-tested a form to extract data on the methods used in each systematic review. RESULTS Our search and screening identified 29 eligible reviews. A large proportion of the reviews (19/29, 66%) were published in 2014 or after; among them, nine reviews were published in 2016. The median number of databases searched for preference studies was four (interquartile range = 2 to 7). We found that less than half of the reviews (13/29, 45%) clearly reported assessing risk of bias or the methodological quality of the included preference studies; not a single review was able to perform quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) of the data on patient preferences. CONCLUSION These results suggest that several methodological issues of performing systematic reviews of patient preferences are not yet fully addressed by research and that the methodology may require future development.
Collapse
|
30
|
Astin F, Horrocks J, McLenachan J, Blackman DJ, Stephenson J, Closs SJ. The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on quality of life: A mixed methods study. Heart Lung 2017; 46:432-438. [PMID: 28985898 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an in-depth understanding of patients' views about the impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on self-reported quality of life. BACKGROUND Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is considered to be the gold standard of care for inoperable patients diagnosed with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Mid- to long-term clinical outcomes are favourable and questionnaire data indicates improvements in quality of life but an in-depth understanding of how quality of life is altered by the intervention is missing. METHODS A mixed methods study design with a total of 89 in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with participants (39% male; mean age 81.7 years), 1 and 3 months post TAVI, recruited from a regional centre in England. Data were triangulated with questionnaire data (SF-36 and EQ5D-VAS) collected, pre, 1 and 3 months post implantation. RESULTS Participants' accounts were characterised by four key themes; shortened life, extended life, limited life and changed life. Quality of life was changed through two mechanisms. Most participants reported a reduced symptom burden and all explained that their life expectancy was improved. Questionnaire data supported interview data with gradual improvements in mean EQ-5D scores and SF-36 physical and mental domain scores at 1 and 3 months compared to baseline. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that TAVI was of variable benefit, producing considerable improvements in either mental or physical health in many participants, while a smaller proportion continued to deteriorate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity Astin
- Centre for Applied Health Research, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK; Research and Development, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, UK.
| | | | - Jim McLenachan
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | | | - John Stephenson
- Centre for Applied Health Research, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bagur R, Pibarot P, Otto CM. Importance of the valve durability-life expectancy ratio in selection of a prosthetic aortic valve. Heart 2017; 103:1756-1759. [DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
32
|
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, Jneid H, Mack MJ, McLeod CJ, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM, Thompson A. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2017; 135:e1159-e1195. [PMID: 28298458 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1398] [Impact Index Per Article: 199.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert O Bonow
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Blase A Carabello
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - John P Erwin
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Lee A Fleisher
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Hani Jneid
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Michael J Mack
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Christopher J McLeod
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Patrick T O'Gara
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Vera H Rigolin
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Thoralf M Sundt
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| | - Annemarie Thompson
- Focused Update writing group members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry may apply; see Appendix 1 for detailed information. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. SCAI Representative. STS Representative. ASE Representative. AATS Representative. SCA Representative
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, Jneid H, Mack MJ, McLeod CJ, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM, Thompson A. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70:252-289. [PMID: 28315732 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1826] [Impact Index Per Article: 260.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
34
|
Foroutan F, Guyatt GH, O'Brien K, Bain E, Stein M, Bhagra S, Sit D, Kamran R, Chang Y, Devji T, Mir H, Manja V, Schofield T, Siemieniuk RA, Agoritsas T, Bagur R, Otto CM, Vandvik PO. Prognosis after surgical replacement with a bioprosthetic aortic valve in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis: systematic review of observational studies. BMJ 2016; 354:i5065. [PMID: 27683072 PMCID: PMC5040922 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of survival, stroke, atrial fibrillation, structural valve deterioration, and length of hospital stay after surgical replacement of an aortic valve (SAVR) with a bioprosthetic valve in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, PubMed (non-Medline records only), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane CENTRAL from 2002 to June 2016. STUDY SELECTION Eligible observational studies followed patients after SAVR with a bioprosthetic valve for at least two years. METHODS Reviewers, independently and in duplicate, evaluated study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias for patient important outcomes. We used the GRADE system to quantify absolute effects and quality of evidence. Published survival curves provided data for survival and freedom from structural valve deterioration, and random effect models provided the framework for estimates of pooled incidence rates of stroke, atrial fibrillation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS In patients undergoing SAVR with a bioprosthetic valve, median survival was 16 years in those aged 65 or less, 12 years in those aged 65 to 75, seven years in those aged 75 to 85, and six years in those aged more than 85. The incidence rate of stroke was 0.25 per 100 patient years (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.54) and atrial fibrillation 2.90 per 100 patient years (1.78 to 4.79). Post-SAVR, freedom from structural valve deterioration was 94.0% at 10 years, 81.7% at 15 years, and 52% at 20 years, and mean length of hospital stay was 12 days (95% confidence interval 9 to 15). CONCLUSION Patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing SAVR with a bioprosthetic valve can expect only slightly lower survival than those without aortic stenosis, and a low incidence of stroke and, up to 10 years, of structural valve deterioration. The rate of deterioration increases rapidly after 10 years, and particularly after 15 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid Foroutan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8 Heart Failure/Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gordon H Guyatt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Kathleen O'Brien
- Heart Failure/Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eva Bain
- Heart Failure/Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Madeleine Stein
- Heart Failure/Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sai Bhagra
- Heart Failure/Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daegan Sit
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Rakhshan Kamran
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Yaping Chang
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Tahira Devji
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Hassan Mir
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Veena Manja
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8 Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA VA WNY Health Care System at Buffalo, Department of Veterans Affairs, USA
| | - Toni Schofield
- Heart Failure/Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reed A Siemieniuk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8 Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Agoritsas
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8 Division of General Internal Medicine, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rodrigo Bagur
- Division of Cardiology, London Health Sciences Centre and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5W9
| | - Catherine M Otto
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Per O Vandvik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust-division Gjøvik, Norway Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Siemieniuk RA, Agoritsas T, Manja V, Devji T, Chang Y, Bala MM, Thabane L, Guyatt GH. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016; 354:i5130. [PMID: 27683246 PMCID: PMC5040923 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical replacement of an aortic valve (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk of perioperative death. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. STUDY SELECTION Randomized trials of TAVI compared with SAVR in patients with a mean perioperative risk of death <8%. REVIEW METHODS Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for outcomes important to patients that were selected a priori by a parallel guideline committee, including patient advisors. We used the GRADE system was used to quantify absolute effects and quality of evidence. RESULTS 4 trials with 3179 patients and a median follow-up of two years were included. Compared with SAVR, transfemoral TAVI was associated with reduced mortality (risk difference per 1000 patients: -30, 95% confidence interval -49 to -8, moderate certainty), stroke (-20, -37 to 1, moderate certainty), life threatening bleeding (-252, -293 to -190, high certainty), atrial fibrillation (-178, -150 to -203, moderate certainty), and acute kidney injury (-53, -39 to -62, high certainty) but increased short term aortic valve reintervention (7, 1 to 21, moderate certainty), permanent pacemaker insertion (134, 16 to 382, moderate certainty), and moderate or severe symptoms of heart failure (18, 5 to 34, moderate certainty). Compared with SAVR, transapical TAVI was associated higher mortality (57, -16 to 153, moderate certainty, P=0.015 for interaction between transfemoral versus transapical TAVI) and stroke (45, -2 to 125, moderate certainty, interaction P=0.012). No study reported long term follow-up, which is particularly important for structural valve deterioration. CONCLUSIONS Many patients, particularly those who have a shorter life expectancy or place a lower value on the risk of long term valve degeneration, are likely to perceive net benefit with transfemoral TAVI versus SAVR. SAVR, however, performs better than transapical TAVI, which is of interest to patients who are not candidates for transfemoral TAVI. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42016042879.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed A Siemieniuk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8 Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas Agoritsas
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8 Division General Internal Medicine, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Veena Manja
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8 Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY,USA VA WNY Health Care System at Buffalo, Department of Veterans Affairs, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Tahira Devji
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Yaping Chang
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Malgorzata M Bala
- Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8
| | - Gordon H Guyatt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8
| |
Collapse
|