1
|
Croft P, Hill JC, Foster NE, Dunn KM, van der Windt DA. Stratified health care for low back pain using the STarT Back approach: Holy Grail or doomed to fail? Pain 2024:00006396-990000000-00658. [PMID: 39037849 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT There have been at least 7 separate randomised controlled trials published between 2011 and 2023 that have examined primary care for nonspecific low back pain informed by the STarT Back approach to stratified care based on risk prediction, compared with care not informed by this approach. The results, across 4 countries, have been contrasting-some demonstrating effectiveness and/or efficiency of this approach, others finding no benefits over comparison interventions. This review considers possible explanations for the differences, particularly whether this is related to poor predictive performance of the STarT Back risk-prediction tool or to variable degrees of success in implementing the whole STarT Back approach (subgrouping and matching treatments to predicted risk of poor outcomes) in different healthcare systems. The review concludes that although there is room for improving and expanding the predictive value of the STarT Back tool, its performance in allocating individuals to their appropriate risk categories cannot alone explain the variation in results of the trials to date. Rather, the learning thus far suggests that challenges in implementing stratified care in clinical practice and in changing professional practice largely explain the contrasting trial results. The review makes recommendations for future research, including greater focus on studying facilitators of implementation of stratified care and developing better treatments for patients with nonspecific low back pain at high risk of poor outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Croft
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan C Hill
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Nadine E Foster
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kate M Dunn
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Danielle A van der Windt
- School of Medicine, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Naye F, Décary S, Houle C, LeBlanc A, Cook C, Dugas M, Skidmore B, Tousignant-Laflamme Y. Six Externally Validated Prognostic Models Have Potential Clinical Value to Predict Patient Health Outcomes in the Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review. Phys Ther 2023; 103:7066982. [PMID: 37245218 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and appraise externally validated prognostic models to predict a patient's health outcomes relevant to physical rehabilitation of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. METHODS We systematically reviewed 8 databases and reported our findings according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020. An information specialist designed a search strategy to identify externally validated prognostic models for MSK conditions. Paired reviewers independently screened the title, abstract, and full text and conducted data extraction. We extracted characteristics of included studies (eg, country and study design), prognostic models (eg, performance measures and type of model) and predicted clinical outcomes (eg, pain and disability). We assessed the risk of bias and concerns of applicability using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. We proposed and used a 5-step method to determine which prognostic models were clinically valuable. RESULTS We found 4896 citations, read 300 full-text articles, and included 46 papers (37 distinct models). Prognostic models were externally validated for the spine, upper limb, lower limb conditions, and MSK trauma, injuries, and pain. All studies presented a high risk of bias. Half of the models showed low concerns for applicability. Reporting of calibration and discrimination performance measures was often lacking. We found 6 externally validated models with adequate measures, which could be deemed clinically valuable [ie, (1) STart Back Screening Tool, (2) Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation RisK model, (3) Da Silva model, (4) PICKUP model, (5) Schellingerhout rule, and (6) Keene model]. Despite having a high risk of bias, which is mostly explained by the very conservative properties of the PROBAST tool, the 6 models remain clinically relevant. CONCLUSION We found 6 externally validated prognostic models developed to predict patients' health outcomes that were clinically relevant to the physical rehabilitation of MSK conditions. IMPACT Our results provide clinicians with externally validated prognostic models to help them better predict patients' clinical outcomes and facilitate personalized treatment plans. Incorporating clinically valuable prognostic models could inherently improve the value of care provided by physical therapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Naye
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Research of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Houle
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Research of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Annie LeBlanc
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chad Cook
- Physical Therapy Division, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michèle Dugas
- VITAM Research Center, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Independent Information Specialist, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Research of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robarts S, Razmjou H, Yee A, Finkelstein J. Risk Stratification in a Tertiary Care Spine Centre: Comparison Between STarTBack and OSPRO-YF Screening Tools. Physiother Can 2023; 75:158-166. [PMID: 37736380 PMCID: PMC10510560 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Purpose STarT Back Screening Tool and OSPRO-YF scales have been reported to be accurate tools for estimating risk for the development of persistent pain or prolonged disability in primary care settings. We performed a comparison of construct convergent and known-group validity and ceiling floor effect (CFE) of these tools using a common sample of patients seen at a tertiary care spine centre. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of patients with and without a work-related back injury. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used as the reference outcome measure for convergent validity. For known-group validity, we examined the ability of the scales to differentiate between different levels of compensation, presence of non-organic signs, and work status. The CFE values were calculated. Results Fifty consecutive injured workers were included along with 50 patients without an active compensation claim related to their low back pain. STarTBack and OSPRO-YF had moderate to high associations with the depression component of the HADS (0.69 to 0.77 respectively) with a statistically significant difference in favour of the OSPRO-YF. STarTBack's risk stratification categories were able to differentiate patients with a compensable injury, non-organic signs, and inability to work (p values ranging from 0.002 to < 0.001). The physical activity and work fear-avoidance beliefs constructs of the OSPRO-YF consistently outperformed other yellow flag constructs (p values ranging from 0.008 to < 0.001). The psychological sub-score of STarTBack showed a ceiling effect. There was a floor effect for the negative affect domain of OSPRO-YF. Neither total score had a floor or ceiling effect. Conclusions STarTBack and OSPRO-YF are short screening tools with acceptable convergent and known-group construct validity and no floor or ceiling effect of their total score. Both tools could assist with the identification, evaluation, and management of psychological distress in patients presenting to tertiary care spine centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Robarts
- From the:
Bone and Joint Program, Holland Orthopaedic & Arthritic Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helen Razmjou
- From the:
Bone and Joint Program, Holland Orthopaedic & Arthritic Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Albert Yee
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joel Finkelstein
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schepman P, Robinson R, Blakeman KH, Wilhelm S, Beck C, Hallberg S, Liseth-Hansen J, De Geer A, Rolfson O, Arendt-Nielsen L. Factors influencing quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis: analyses from the BISCUITS study. Scand J Pain 2023; 23:139-148. [PMID: 35787832 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Osteoarthritis can have a profound effect on patients' quality of life. The Burden of Disease and Management of Osteoarthritis and Chronic Low Back Pain: Health Care Utilization and Sick Leave in Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark (BISCUITS) study aimed to describe the impact of osteoarthritis on quality of life and determine the association with factors such as pain severity and pharmacological treatment. METHODS An observational study was performed with a cross-sectional design including patients with a confirmed osteoarthritis diagnosis enrolled in the National Quality Register for Better management of patients with Osteoarthritis (BOA) between 2016 and 2017 in Sweden. Patient-reported information from BOA was linked to administrative data from three national health registers. The impact of osteoarthritis on quality of life was estimated using the EQ-5D-5L and the first developed experienced-based time-trade-off value set for Sweden to calculate the EQ-5D-5L index scores. EQ-5D-3L index scores were also estimated based on a UK hypothetical value set via a crosswalk method. Ordinary least squares regression models were used to analyse the association between quality of life and potential influencing factors. RESULTS For the 34,254 patients evaluated, mean EQ-5D-5L index score was 0.792 (SD 0.126). Stratifications showed that the index score varied across different levels of pain severity. Increased pain severity and use of pain-relieving medications remained significantly associated with a lower quality of life index score when controlled for potential confounders. The mean EQ-5D-3L index score was 0.605 (SD 0.192). CONCLUSIONS This large population-based study from Sweden highlights the substantial impact of osteoarthritis on quality of life amongst different patient groups and that currently available treatment options for osteoarthritis pain do not appropriately address the needs for many osteoarthritis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stefan Wilhelm
- Eli Lilly International Medical Affairs, Bad Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Ola Rolfson
- University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Arendt-Nielsen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology (Mech-Sense), Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nagahori H, Miki T, Momma H. The relationship between the Keele STarT back screening tool, the short form of central sensitivity inventory and health-related quality of life in patients with low back pain. J Man Manip Ther 2022; 30:350-356. [PMID: 35282797 PMCID: PMC9621249 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2049485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It has been reported that the scores of the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) and the short form of Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-9) are associated with Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in patients with low back pain (LBP). However, it is unclear which screening tool is more associated with HRQoL in patients with LBP. OBJECTIVE To identify which SBST and CSI-9 are more related to HRQoL and investigate the association between SBST and CSI-9 scores. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional study. METHOD A multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the factors associated with the HRQoL using age, pain intensity, disability, SBST score, and CSI-9 score as independent variables. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was also conducted to determine the association between SBST and CSI-9 score. RESULTS Multiple regression analysis revealed that the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (p < 0.01, β = -0.62, VIF = 1.70) and SBST score (p < 0.01, β = -0.32, VIF = 1.86) were significant associated variables. A significant association was found between SBST and CSI-9 scores (p < 0.01, ρ = 0.47). CONCLUSION The results showed that in patients with LBP the association of HRQoL with SBST was more substantial than with CSI-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Takahiro Miki
- Department of Rehabilitation, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopedic Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.,Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Momma
- Department of Physiotherapy, Kyorin University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mitaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Association of non-chronic low back pain with physical function, endurance, fatigability, and quality of life in middle- and older-aged adults: Findings from Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277083. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is an important condition associated with high healthcare burden. However, the relationship of this condition with physical function (PF) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains unclear. This is a cross-sectional study that aims to investigate the association between presence and intensity of non-chronic LBP with PF and HRQoL in middle-and older-aged adults. Participants answered questions about presence and intensity of LBP in the previous year, self-reported their PF and HRQoL (SF-12), and underwent objective measures of PF ([ExSPPB] including usual gait speed, narrow walk, chair stands, and standing balance), endurance performance ([EP] long-distance corridor walk) and fatigability. Generalized linear models and logistic regression models were performed. A total of 1500 participants (52.5% women, 70.3% white) aged 69.0 (SD 13.1) years were included. Of those, 642 (42.8%) reported LBP and the mean pain intensity was 4.1 (SD 2.2). After adjustments for potential confounders, presence of LBP was associated with lower self-reported PF (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.37), lower physical component of HRQoL (β -0.03, 95% CI -0.04 to -0.02) and poorer chair stand performance (β -0.05, 95% CI -0.09 to -0.008). Higher intensity of LBP was associated with lower physical component of HRQoL (β -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.007), poorer ExSPPB performance (β -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.004), slower usual gait speed (β -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.004), lower total standing balance time (β -0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.001) and higher fatigability (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.25). The presence of non-chronic LBP was more consistently associated with lower self-reported PF, while higher intensity non-chronic LBP was associated with poorer objectively measured PF and fatigability. Collectively, this evidence suggests that although presence of pain may affect perception of function, greater pain intensity appears more strongly associated with unfavorable functional performance in mid-to-late life.
Collapse
|
7
|
Virkkunen T, Husu P, Tokola K, Parkkari J, Kankaanpää M. Depressive Symptoms Are Associated With Decreased Quality of Life and Work Ability in Currently Working Health Care Workers With Recurrent Low Back Pain. J Occup Environ Med 2022; 64:782-787. [PMID: 35673261 PMCID: PMC9426739 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigates the association between depressive symptoms and multisite pain and health-related quality of life and work ability in currently employed health care workers with recurrent low back pain (LBP). METHODS Multisite pain, depressive symptoms, quality of life, and work ability were assessed by validated questionnaires. A generalized linear model was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Notably, 28% of female health care workers with LBP had at least moderate levels of depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms were significantly associated with decreased health-related quality of life and work ability. Multisite pain was not significantly associated with work ability. CONCLUSIONS Depressive symptoms are relatively common in female health care workers with LBP, and treatment of these symptoms may be crucial to improve their work ability.
Collapse
|
8
|
Giusti EM, Varallo G, Abenavoli A, Manzoni GM, Aletti L, Capodaglio P, Castelnuovo G, Maggiani A. Factor Structure, Validity, and Reliability of the STarT Back Screening Tool in Italian Obese and Non-obese Patients With Low Back Pain. Front Psychol 2021; 12:740851. [PMID: 34744912 PMCID: PMC8563832 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) is a self-report questionnaire developed for prognostic purposes which evaluates risk factors for disability outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain. Previous studies found that its use enables to provide a cost-effective stratified care. However, its dimensionality has been assessed only using exploratory approaches, and reports on its psychometric properties are conflicting. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the factorial structure and the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST). Materials and Methods: Patients with medical diagnosis of low back pain were enrolled from a rehabilitation unit of a tertiary care hospital specialized in obesity care (Sample 1) and from a clinical internship center of an osteopathic training institute (Sample 2). At baseline and after 7 days patients were asked to fill a battery of self-report questionnaires. The factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the SBST were assessed. Results: One hundred forty-six patients were enrolled (62 from Sample 1 and 84 from Sample 2). The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit of the original two-correlated factors model was adequate (CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.03). Cronbach's α of the total scale (α = 0.64) and of the subscales (physical subscale α = 0.55; psychological subscale α = 0.61) was below the cutoffs, partly because of the low correlation of item 2 with the other items. Test-retest reliability was adequate (ICC = 0.84). The SBST had moderate correlations with comparisons questionnaires, except for the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, which had a high correlation (r = 0.65). Discussion: The SBST has adequate psychometric properties and can be used to assess prognostic factors for disability in low back pain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Maria Giusti
- Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Psychology Research Laboratory, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Verbania, Italy
| | - Giorgia Varallo
- Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Psychology Research Laboratory, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Verbania, Italy
| | - Alessandra Abenavoli
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana di Medicina Osteopatica (AIMO), Saronno, Italy
| | - Gian Mauro Manzoni
- Faculty of Psychology, eCampus University, Novedrate, Italy.,Psychology Research Laboratory, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Verbania, Italy
| | - Luca Aletti
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana di Medicina Osteopatica (AIMO), Saronno, Italy
| | - Paolo Capodaglio
- Rehabilitation Unit and Research Laboratory in Biomechanics and Rehabilitation, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, San Giuseppe Hospital, Verbania, Italy.,Department Surgical Sciences, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Gianluca Castelnuovo
- Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Psychology Research Laboratory, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Verbania, Italy
| | - Alberto Maggiani
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana di Medicina Osteopatica (AIMO), Saronno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Unsgaard-Tøndel M, Vasseljen O, Nilsen TIL, Myhre G, Robinson HS, Meisingset I. Prognostic ability of STarT Back Screening Tool combined with work-related factors in patients with low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046446. [PMID: 34083340 PMCID: PMC8183211 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Primary care screening tools for patients with low back pain may improve outcome by identifying modifiable obstacles for recovery. The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) consists of nine biological and psychological items, with less focus on work-related factors. We aimed at testing the prognostic ability of SBST and the effect of adding items for future and present work ability. METHODS Prospective observational study in patients (n=158) attending primary care physical therapy for low back pain. The prognostic ability of SBST and the added prognostic value of two work items; expectation for future work ability and current work ability, were calculated for disability, pain and quality of life outcome at 3 months follow-up. The medium and high-risk group in the SBST were collapsed in the analyses due to few patients in the high-risk group. The prognostic ability was assessed using the explained variance (R2) of the outcomes from univariable and multivariable linear regression and beta values with 95% CIs were used to assess the prognostic value of individual items. RESULTS The SBST classified 107 (67.7%) patients as low risk and 51 (32.3%) patients as medium/high risk. SBST provided prognostic ability for disability (R2=0.35), pain (R2=0.25) and quality of life (R2=0.28). Expectation for return to work predicted outcome in univariable analyses but provided limited additional prognostic ability when added to the SBST. Present work ability provided additional prognostic ability for disability (β=-2.5; 95% CI=-3.6 to -1.4), pain (β=-0.2; 95% CI=-0.5 to -0.002) and quality of life (β=0.02; 95% CI=0.001 to 0.04) in the multivariable analyses. The explained variance (R2) when work ability was added to the SBST was 0.60, 0.49 and 0.47 for disability, pain and quality of life, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Adding one work ability item to the SBST gives additional prognostic information across core outcomes. Clinical trial number: NCT03626389.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Unsgaard-Tøndel
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Physiotherapy, Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ottar Vasseljen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tom Ivar Lund Nilsen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gard Myhre
- Department of Physiotherapy, Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Ingebrigt Meisingset
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Physiotherapy, Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sturesdotter Åkesson K, Beckman A, Stigmar K, Sundén A, Ekvall Hansson E. Physical activity and health-related quality of life in men and women with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis before and after a supported self-management programme - a prospective observational study. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:4275-4283. [PMID: 33761294 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1900417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study differences between men and women in physical activity (PA) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before and after participating in a supported osteoarthritis (OA) self-management programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective observational study using data from a Swedish National Quality Register. Patients recorded between 2008 and 2013 with hip and/or knee OA with data at baseline, at 3 and 12 months follow-up (n = 7628) were included. Outcome measures were patient-reported PA and HRQoL (EQ-5D-3L). RESULTS A greater proportion of men (p = 0.002) changed to being physically active ≥150 min/week at 3 months follow-up. The proportion of women being physically active ≥150 min/week was larger than for men at baseline (p = 0.003) and at follow-up at 12 months (p = 0.035). Women reported lower HRQoL than men at baseline (p < 0.001), at follow-up at 3 (p < 0.001) and 12 months (p = 0.010). There were no differences between men and women in change in HRQoL at 3 (p = 0.629) and 12 months (p = 0.577) follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This study showed differences between men and women in PA and HRQoL before and after participating in a supported OA self-management programme. These differences should be considered when supporting PA and HRQoL.Implications for rehabilitationMen with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis (OA) might need more support during rehabilitation in order to maintain or even increase physical activity (PA) in the long run.Women with hip and/or knee OA might need more support during rehabilitation in order to maintain or even increase health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the long run.Booster sessions might be suggested in order to enable both men and women with hip and/or knee OA to sustain improvements in PA and HRQoL after participating in a supported OA self-management programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anders Beckman
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kjerstin Stigmar
- Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Research and Education, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anne Sundén
- Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Ekvall Hansson
- Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Szita J, Kiss L, Biczo A, Feher K, Varga PP, Lazary A. Outcome of group physical therapy treatment for non-specific low back pain patients can be predicted with the cross-culturally adapted and validated Hungarian version STarT back screening tool. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 44:1427-1435. [PMID: 32735178 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1799248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The STarT Back Tool was developed to identify the specific modifiable prognostic factors for non-specific low back pain and to classify the patients into risk groups; low, medium and high risk of chronicity. Applied therapeutic approaches often involve group physical therapy. The aim of this study was the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the STarT Back Tool and to investigate the predictive ability for global treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective cohort study (N = 133) was carried out involving non-specific low back pain patients. Internal consistency, construct validity, reliability and prognostic discriminative ability have been investigated. After 3 months of treatment global outcome was evaluated. RESULTS A 2-factor structure was found, with moderate internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.89 for the total and psychosocial subscale 0.62). Between the Hungarian STarT Back Tool, the Oswestry Disability Index, leg pain, low back pain, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and the physical subscale of the quality of life questionnaire, significant good to excellent- correlation was found (r > 0.41). The test-retest analysis showed excellent reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.93) with standard error measurement being 0.49 (minimal detectable change = 1.37). The Area Under the Curve for baseline STarT Back Tool scores was 0.7 and 0.8 for global treatment outcome and distress, respectively. The Area Under the Curve for global treatment outcome versus STarT risk groups proved to be 0.76 representing adequate discriminative ability. CONCLUSION The successful cross-cultural adaptation was followed by the validity analysis and as a result the Hungarian version of the STarT Back Tool proved to be a reliable and valid tool in the identification of risk groups of chronicity for patients with low back pain. Patients allocated to the high-risk group were more likely experiencing poor outcome at 3 months follow up, thus it can be used to predict outcome if treated with group physical therapy.Implication for rehabilitationLow back pain is a multifactorial disease where physical and psychosocial risk factors play a role in the development and prognosis of the disease.The STarT-H can be considered as a reliable, valid measurement tool in the identification of risk groups of chronicity for patients with low back pain.Clinical relevance of the STarT-H is that it can be used to stratify patients into risk groups of chronicity in different Hungarian speaking healthcare settings.According to our findings the STarT-H can also be applied to predict global treatment outcome in low back pain patients if treated with group physical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Szita
- Department of Research and Development, National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary.,Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University School of Ph.D. Studies, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Laszlo Kiss
- Department of Research and Development, National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary.,Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University School of Ph.D. Studies, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Adam Biczo
- Department of Research and Development, National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary.,Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University School of Ph.D. Studies, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Katalin Feher
- Department of Spinal Surgery, National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Peter P Varga
- Department of Spinal Surgery, National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Aron Lazary
- Department of Research and Development, National Center for Spinal Disorders, Budapest, Hungary.,Department of Spine Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|