1
|
Bertini L, Schmidt-Renfree N, Blackstone J, Stirrup O, Adams N, Cullen-Stephenson I, Krutikov M, Leiser R, Goscé L, Henderson C, Flowers P, Shallcross L, Cassell JA, Cadar D. VIVALDI ASCOT and Ethnography Study: protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal study to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 and other respiratory infection outbreaks on care home residents' quality of life and psychosocial well-being. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e088685. [PMID: 39117401 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults in care homes experienced some of the highest rates of mortality from SARS-CoV-2 globally and were subjected to strict and lengthy non-pharmaceutical interventions, which severely impacted their daily lives. The VIVALDI ASCOT and Ethnography Study aims to assess the impact of respiratory outbreaks on care home residents' quality of life, psychological well-being, loneliness, functional ability and use of space. This study is linked to the VIVALDI-CT, a randomised controlled trial of staff's asymptomatic testing and sickness payment support in care homes (ISRCTN13296529). METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a mixed-methods, longitudinal study of care home residents (65+) in Southeast England. Group 1-exposed includes residents from care homes with a recent COVID-19 or other respiratory infection outbreak. Group 2-non-exposed includes residents from care homes without a recent outbreak. The study has two components: (a) a mixed-methods longitudinal face-to-face interviews with 100 residents (n=50 from group 1 and n=50 from group 2) to assess the impact of outbreaks on residents' quality of life, psychological well-being, loneliness, functional ability and use of space at time 1 (study baseline) and time 2 (at 3-4 weeks after the first visit); (b) ethnographic observations in communal spaces of up to 10 care homes to understand how outbreaks and related restrictions to the use of space and social activities impact residents' well-being. The study will interview only care home residents who have the mental capacity to consent. Data will be compared and integrated to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of outbreaks on residents' quality of life and well-being. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The VIVALDI ASCOT and Ethnography Study obtained ethical approval from the Health Research Authority (HRA) Social Care REC (24/IEC08/0001). Only residents with the capacity to consent will be included in the study. Findings will be published in scientific journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lavinia Bertini
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- Department of Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Nicola Schmidt-Renfree
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- Department of Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - James Blackstone
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Oliver Stirrup
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Natalie Adams
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- UCL Institute of Health Informatics, London, UK
| | | | - Maria Krutikov
- Institute of Health informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ruth Leiser
- Department of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lara Goscé
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Catherine Henderson
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Laura Shallcross
- Institute of Health informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jackie A Cassell
- Department of Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Dorina Cadar
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- Behavioural Scince and Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kelly S, Cowan A, Akdur G, Irvine L, Peryer G, Welsh S, Rand S, Lang IA, Towers AM, Spilsbury K, Killett A, Gordon AL, Hanratty B, Jones L, Meyer J, Goodman C, Burton JK. Outcome measures from international older adult care home intervention research: a scoping review. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad069. [PMID: 37192505 PMCID: PMC10187991 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care homes are increasingly important settings for intervention research to enhance evidence-informed care. For such research to demonstrate effectiveness, it is essential that measures are appropriate for the population, setting and practice contexts. OBJECTIVE To identify care home intervention studies and describe the resident outcome measures used. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS We reviewed international care home research published from 2015 to August 2022. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and ASSIA. We included any intervention study conducted in a care home, reporting resident outcomes. We extracted resident outcome measures, organised these using the domains of an adapted framework and described their use. RESULTS From 7,330 records screened, we included 396 datasets reported in 436 publications. These included 12,167 care homes and 836,842 residents, with an average of 80 residents per study. The studies evaluated 859 unique resident outcomes 2,030 times using 732 outcome measures. Outcomes were evaluated between 1 and 112 times, with 75.1% of outcomes evaluated only once. Outcome measures were used 1-120 times, with 68.4% of measures used only once. Only 14 measures were used ≥20 times. Functional status, mood & behaviour and medications were the commonest outcome domains assessed. More than half of outcomes were assessed using scales, with a fifth using existing records or administrative data. CONCLUSIONS There is significant heterogeneity in the choice and assessment of outcomes for intervention research in care homes. There is an urgent need to develop a consensus on useful and sensitive tools for care homes, working with residents, families and friends and staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kelly
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, East Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK
- THIS Institute, University of Cambridge, Clifford Allbutt Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0AH, UK
| | - Andy Cowan
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, East Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK
| | - Gizdem Akdur
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Lisa Irvine
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Guy Peryer
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, CB2 8AH, UK
| | - Silje Welsh
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Cornwallis Central, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK
| | - Iain A Lang
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, South West Peninsula, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies, Cornwallis Central, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Kent Surrey and Sussex, BN3 7HZ, UK
| | - Karen Spilsbury
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Yorkshire and Humber, BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, CB2 8AH, UK
| | - Adam Lee Gordon
- Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences (IRIS), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3DT, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East Midlands, LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5PL, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, North East and North Cumbria, NE3 3XT, UK
| | - Liz Jones
- National Care Forum, Friars House, Manor House Drive, Coventry CV1 2TE, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- National Care Forum, Friars House, Manor House Drive, Coventry CV1 2TE, UK
- City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, CB2 8AH, UK
| | - Jennifer Kirsty Burton
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sakurai H, Miyashita M, Morita T, Naito AS, Miyamoto S, Otani H, Nozato J, Yokomichi N, Imai K, Oishi A, Kizawa Y, Matsushima E. Comparison between patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes: Validation of the Japanese version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for staff. Palliat Support Care 2021; 19:702-708. [PMID: 33666153 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951521000018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The goal of palliative and supportive care is to improve patients' quality of life (QoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are the gold standard for the assessment of QoL and symptoms; however, when self-reporting is complicated, PROMs are often substituted with proxy-reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcome measures. The objective of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for staff (IPOS-Staff). METHODS This multicenter, cross-sectional observational study was conducted concurrently with the validation of the IPOS for patients (IPOS-Patient). Japanese adult patients with cancer and their staff were recruited. We assessed the characteristics of the patients and staff members, missing values, prevalence, and total IPOS scores. For the analysis of criterion validity, intra-rater, and inter-rater reliability, we calculated intraclass correlations (ICCs). RESULTS One hundred and forty-three patients completed the IPOS-Patient, and 79 medical staff members completed the IPOS-Staff. The most common missing values from IPOS-Staff were Family Anxiety (3.5%) and Sharing Feelings (3.5%). Over half of the patients scored themselves moderate or worse for Poor Mobility, Anxiety, and Family Anxiety, while staff members scored patients moderate or worse for Weakness, Anxiety, and Family Anxiety. For criterion validity (patient-staff agreement) as well as intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, ICCs ranged from 0.114 (Sharing Feelings) to 0.826 (Nausea), 0.720 (Anxiety) to 0.933 (Nausea), and -0.038 (Practical Problems) to 0.830 (Nausea), respectively. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS The IPOS-Staff is easy to respond to; it has fair validity and reliability for physical items but poor for psycho-social items. By defining the context and objectives of its use and interpretation, the IPOS-Staff can be a useful tool for measuring outcomes in adult patients with cancer who cannot complete self-evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Sakurai
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsunori Miyashita
- Department of Palliative Nursing and Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Morita
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Akemi Shirado Naito
- Department of Palliative Care, Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Otani
- Department of Palliative Care Team, and Palliative and Supportive Care, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Junko Nozato
- Department of Cancer Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naosuke Yokomichi
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Kengo Imai
- Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Ai Oishi
- Primary Palliative Care Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Eisuke Matsushima
- Section of Liaison Psychiatry and Palliative Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kelly C, Hulme C, Graham L, Ellwood A, Patel I, Cundill B, Farrin A, Goodwin M, Hull K, Fisher J, Forster A. Inter-rater reliability of care home staff's proxy judgements with residents' assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data. Age Ageing 2021; 50:1314-1320. [PMID: 33822852 PMCID: PMC8244559 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES to compare care staff proxies with care home residents' self-assessment of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS we assessed the degree of inter-rater reliability between residents and care staff proxies for the EQ-5D-5L index, domains and EQ Visual Analogue Scale at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, collected as part of the PATCH trial. We calculated kappa scores. Interpreted as <0 no agreement, 0-0.2 slight, 0.21-0.60 fair to moderate and >0.6 substantial to almost perfect agreement. Qualitative interviews with care staff and researchers explored the challenges of completing these questions. RESULTS over 50% of the HRQoL data from residents was missing at baseline compared with a 100% completion rate by care staff proxies. A fair-to-moderate level of agreement was found for the EQ-5D-5L index. A higher level of agreement was achieved for the EQ-5D-5L domains of mobility and pain. Resident 'non-completers' were more likely to: be older, have stayed a longer duration in the care home, have lower Barthel Index and Physical Activity and Mobility in Residential Care (PAM-RC) scores, a greater number of co-morbidities and have joined the trial through consultee agreement. Interviews with staff and researchers indicated that it was easier to rate residents' mobility levels than other domains, but in general it was difficult to obtain data from residents or to make an accurate proxy judgement for those with dementia. CONCLUSIONS whilst assessing HRQoL by care staff proxy completion provides a more complete dataset, uncertainty remains as to how representative these values are for different groups of residents within care homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claire Hulme
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Liz Graham
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Ismail Patel
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Bonnie Cundill
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Karen Hull
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
- Leeds Neurophysiotherapy, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nikolova S, Hulme C, West R, Pendleton N, Heaven A, Bower P, Humphrey S, Farrin A, Cundill B, Hawkins R, Clegg A. Normative Estimates and Agreement Between 2 Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life in Older People With Frailty: Findings From the Community Ageing Research 75+ Cohort. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:1056-1062. [PMID: 32828218 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have summarized evidence on health-related quality of life for older people, identifying a range of measures that have been validated, but have not sought to present results by degree of frailty. Furthermore, previous studies did not typically use quality-of-life measures that generate an overall health utility score. Health utility scores are a necessary component of quality-adjusted life-year calculations used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of interventions. METHODS We calculated normative estimates in mean and standard deviation for EQ-5D-5L, short-form 36-item health questionnaire in frailty (SF-36), and short-form 6-dimension (SF-6D) for a range of established frailty models. We compared response distributions across dimensions of the measures and investigated agreement using Bland-Altman and interclass correlation techniques. RESULTS The EQ-5D-5L, SF-36, and SF-6D scores decrease and their variability increases with advancing frailty. There is strong agreement between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D across the spectrum of frailty. Agreement is lower for people who are most frail, indicating that different components of the 2 instruments may have greater relevance for people with advancing frailty in later life. There is a greater risk of ceiling effects using the EQ-5D-5L rather than the SF-6D. CONCLUSIONS We recommend the SF-36/SF-6D as an appropriate measure of health-related quality of life for clinical trials if fit older people are the planned target. In trials of interventions involving older people with increasing frailty, we recommend that both the EQ-5D-5L and SF36/SF6D are included, and are used in sensitivity analyses as part of cost-effectiveness evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silviya Nikolova
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.
| | - Claire Hulme
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, UK
| | - Robert West
- Division of Health Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Neil Pendleton
- Salford Royal NHS Hospital, Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Anne Heaven
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Sara Humphrey
- North Street Surgery, Partner Affinity Care, Westcliffe Health Innovations, Yorkshire & Humber Dementia CN, Bradford University School of Dementia Studies, England, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Bonnie Cundill
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Rebecca Hawkins
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shepherd V. An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent. Trials 2020; 21:445. [PMID: 32471488 PMCID: PMC7257506 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04406-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing international recognition that populations included in trials should adequately represent the population treated in clinical practice; however, adults who lack the capacity to provide informed consent are frequently excluded from trials. Addressing the under-representation of groups such as those with impaired capacity to consent is essential to develop effective interventions and provide these groups with the opportunity to benefit from evidence-based care. While the spotlight has been on ensuring only appropriate and justifiable exclusion criteria are used in trials, barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity are multifactorial and complex, and addressing their under-representation will require more than merely widening eligibility criteria. This commentary draws on the literature exploring the inclusion of adults lacking the capacity to consent in research and a number of recent studies to describe the methodological, structural, and systemic factors that have been identified. MAIN TEXT A number of potentially modifiable factors contributing to the under-representation of adults lacking the capacity to consent in trials have been identified. In addition to restrictive eligibility criteria, methodological issues include developing appropriate interventions and outcome measures for populations with impaired capacity. Structurally determined factors include the resource-intensive nature of these trials, the requirement for more appropriate research infrastructure, and a lack of interventions to inform and support proxy decision-makers. Systemic factors include the complexities of the legal frameworks, the challenges of ethical review processes, and paternalistic attitudes towards protecting adults with incapacity from the perceived harms of research. CONCLUSIONS Measures needed to address under-representation include greater scrutiny of exclusion criteria by those reviewing study proposals, providing education and training for personnel who design, conduct, and review research, ensuring greater consistency in the reviews undertaken by research ethics committees, and extending processes for advance planning to include prospectively appointing a proxy for research and documenting preferences about research participation. Negative societal and professional attitudes towards the inclusion of adults with impaired capacity in research should also be addressed, and the development of trials that are more person-centred should be encouraged. Further work to conceptualise under-representation in trials for such populations may also be helpful.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hui A, Latif A, Hinsliff-Smith K, Chen T. Exploring the impacts of organisational structure, policy and practice on the health inequalities of marginalised communities: Illustrative cases from the UK healthcare system. Health Policy 2020; 124:298-302. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
8
|
Usman A, Lewis S, Hinsliff-Smith K, Long A, Housley G, Jordan J, Gage H, Dening T, Gladman JRF, Gordon AL. Measuring health-related quality of life of care home residents: comparison of self-report with staff proxy responses. Age Ageing 2019; 48:407-413. [PMID: 30615057 PMCID: PMC6503932 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction care home residents are often unable to complete health-related quality of life questionnaires for themselves because of prevalent cognitive impairment. This study compared care home resident and staff proxy responses for two measures, the EQ-5D-5L and HowRU. Methods a prospective cohort study recruited residents ≥60 years across 24 care homes who were not receiving short stay, respite or terminal care. Resident and staff proxy EQ-5D-5L and HowRu responses were collected monthly for 3 months. Weighted kappa statistics and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) adjusted for clustering at the care home level were used to measure agreement between resident and proxies for each time point. The effect of staff and resident baseline variables on agreement was considered using a multilevel mixed effect regression model. Results 117, 109 and 104 matched pairs completed the questionnaires at 1, 2 and 3 months, respectively. When clustering was controlled for, agreement between resident and staff proxy EQ-5D-5L responses was fair for mobility (ICC: 0.29) and slight for all other domains (ICC ≤ 0.20). EQ-5D Index and Quality-Adjusted Life Year scores (proxy scores higher than residents) showed better agreement than EQ-5D-VAS (residents scores higher than proxy). HowRU showed only slight agreement (ICC ≤ 0.20) between residents and proxies. Staff and resident characteristics did not influence level of agreement for either index. Discussion the levels of agreement for EQ-5D-5L and HowRU raise questions about their validity in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeela Usman
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK
| | - Sarah Lewis
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK
| | - Annabelle Long
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK
| | - Gemma Housley
- East Midlands Academic Health Science Network, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jake Jordan
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Heather Gage
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Tom Dening
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - John R F Gladman
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- East Midlands Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adam L Gordon
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK
- East Midlands Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chadborn NH, Goodman C, Zubair M, Sousa L, Gladman JRF, Dening T, Gordon AL. Role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in healthcare of older people in UK care homes: realist review. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026921. [PMID: 30962238 PMCID: PMC6500328 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) may be a way to deliver optimal care for care home residents. We used realist review to develop a theory-driven account of how CGA works in care homes. DESIGN Realist review. SETTING Care homes. METHODS The review had three stages: first, interviews with expert stakeholders and scoping of the literature to develop programme theories for CGA; second, iterative searches with structured retrieval and extraction of the literature; third, synthesis to refine the programme theory of how CGA works in care homes.We used the following databases: Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, PsychInfo, PubMed, Google Scholar, Greylit, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS 130 articles informed a programme theory which suggested CGA had three main components: structured comprehensive assessment, developing a care plan and working towards patient-centred goals. Each of these required engagement of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Most evidence was available around assessment, with tension between structured assessment led by a single professional and less structured assessment involving multiple members of an MDT. Care planning needed to accommodate visiting clinicians and there was evidence that a core MDT often used care planning as a mechanism to seek external specialist support. Goal-setting processes were not always sufficiently patient-centred and did not always accommodate the views of care home staff. Studies reported improved outcomes from CGA affecting resident satisfaction, prescribing, healthcare resource use and objective measures of quality of care. CONCLUSION The programme theory described here provides a framework for understanding how CGA could be effective in care homes. It will be of use to teams developing, implementing or auditing CGA in care homes. All three components are required to make CGA work-this may explain why attempts to implement CGA by interventions focused solely on assessment or care planning have failed in some long-term care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017062601.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil H Chadborn
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East of England, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maria Zubair
- Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Lídia Sousa
- Santa Maria University Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - John R F Gladman
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tom Dening
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adam L Gordon
- National Institute of Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|