Morphine in acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

Beyond Traditional Pain Relief: A Review of Alternative Analgesics in Myocardial Infarction Patient Management

While morphine is the recommended first-line treatment for pain management in patients with acute coronary syndrome, recent studies have raised concerns about its association with adverse outcomes. Morphine has been found to cause delayed antiplatelet effects, decreased ticagrelor absorption, increased platelet reactivity, and compromised efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Alternative analgesics, such as lidocaine, fentanyl, and acetaminophen, have begun to emerge as viable alternatives, each with unique mechanisms and potential benefits. Lidocaine is demonstrated to have superior effects in reducing microvascular obstruction and fewer adverse events compared to fentanyl, despite being less effective in pain reduction. Fentanyl, which shows rapid onset and powerful analgesic properties, may interfere with ticagrelor absorption, potentially affecting platelet inhibition. Acetaminophen, a centrally acting analgesic, emerges as a safer alternative with comparable pain relief efficacy and minimal side effects. The results of multiple clinical trials emphasize the significance of customizing pain management approaches to match individual patient profiles and achieving the optimal balance between pain relief and potential adverse outcomes.

[Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes]

Despite significant advances in the detection and rapid management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), it continues to lead the cause of death statistics and they continuously represent the leading cause of death and living with disabilities, globally. Since ACS combine a spectrum of different diagnoses, a high degree of variability in possible clinical presentation and relevant gender differences, Individualised treatment is not always easy and is constantly changing due to novel evidence from research studies. Therefore, the aim of this article is therefore to explain relevant treatment options and to present the current state of science in the context of clinical patient treatment.

Signal of harm in morphine use in adults with acute pulmonary oedema: A rapid systematic review

BACKGROUND

Heart failure affects nearly 65 million people globally, resulting in recurrent hospital admissions and substantial healthcare expenditure. The use of morphine in the management of acute pulmonary oedema remains controversial, with conflicting guidance and significant variation in practice. Synthesised evidence is needed to inform standard treatment guidelines and clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether morphine should be used in the treatment of acute pulmonary oedema (APE) in adults.

METHODS

A rapid review of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials or observational studies, and then randomised controlled trials, was conducted searching three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) and one clinical trial registry on 12 February 2022. We used a prespecified protocol following Cochrane rapid review methods and aligned to the National Standard Treatment Guidelines and Essential Medicines List methodology. We first considered relevant high-quality systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials or observational studies, then (if required) randomised controlled trials to inform time-sensitive or urgent evidence requests, clinical practice, policy, or standard treatment guidelines.

RESULTS

We identified four systematic reviews of observational studies. The two most relevant, up-to-date, and highest-quality reviews were used to inform evidence for critical outcomes. Morphine may increase in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 - 3.13; low certainty of evidence; six observational studies, n=151 735 participants), resulting in 15 more per 1 000 hospital deaths, ranging from 0 to 40 more hospital deaths. Morphine may result in a large increase in invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.09 - 6.80; low certainty of evidence; four observational studies, n=167 847 participants), resulting in 45 more per 1 000 ventilations, ranging from 2 more to 136 more. Adverse events and hospital length of stay were not measured across reviews or trials.

CONCLUSION

Based on the most recent, relevant and best-available quality evidence, morphine use in adults with APE may increase in-hospital and all-cause mortality and may result in a large increase in the need for invasive mechanical ventilation compared to not using morphine. Recommending against the use of morphine in pulmonary oedema may improve patient outcomes. Disinvesting in morphine for this indication may result in cost savings, noting the possible accrued benefits of fewer patients requiring invasive ventilation and management of morphine-related side-effects.

Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin for treating motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin (BTX) for motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease (PD).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, from database inception to 20 October 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reported in English with adult PD patients treated with BTX.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Primary outcomes were United Parkinson's Disease Rate Scale Section (UPDRS) III (or its items) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were UPDRS-II (or its items), Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q), Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Mean difference (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) before and after treatment with 95% CIs were used for continuous variables and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs was used for TRAEs.

RESULTS

Six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and six non-RCTs (case series) were included (ntotal=224 participants, nRCT=165). No significant difference was found in pooled results of UPDRS-III (available in four RCTs and two non-RCTs, SMD=-0.19, 95% CI -0.98 to 0.60), UPDRS-II (four RCTs and one non-RCT, SMD=-0.55, 95% CI -1.22 to 0.13), FOG-Q (one RCT and one non-RCT, SMD=0.53, 95% CI -1.93 to 2.98) or the risk of TRAEs (five RCTs, RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.01). Significant decreases were found in pooled VAS score (three RCTs and five non-RCTs, MD=-2.14, 95% CI -3.05 to -1.23) and TUG (MD=-2.06, 95% CI -2.91 to -1.20) after BTX treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

BTX may not be associated with motor symptoms alleviation, although it benefits pain alleviation and functional mobility improvement.

Negative Impact of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Morphine Dose on Ticagrelor Uptake and Pharmacodynamics: A Population PK/PD Analysis of Pooled Individual Participant Data

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor is widely used in patients with stable and acute coronary artery disease. Understanding the factors that influence its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) could improve therapeutic outcomes. We therefore performed a pooled population PK/PD analysis using individual patient data from two studies. We focused on the impact of morphine administration and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on the risk of high platelet reactivity (HPR) and dyspnea.

METHODS

A parent-metabolite population PK/PD model was developed based on data from 63 STEMI, 50 non-STEMI, and 25 chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients. Simulations were then run to evaluate the risk of non-response and adverse events associated with the identified variability factors.

RESULTS

The final PK model consisted of first-order absorption with transit compartments, distribution with two compartments for ticagrelor and one compartment for AR-C124910XX (active metabolite of ticagrelor), and linear elimination for both drugs. The final PK/PD model was an indirect turnover model with production inhibition. Morphine dose and STEMI, independently, had a significant negative effect on the absorption rate (reduction of log([Formula: see text]) by 0.21×morphine dose (mg) and by 2.37 in STEMI patients, both p < 0.001), and the presence of STEMI significantly impacted both efficacy and potency (both p < 0.001). The simulations run with the validated model showed a high rate of non-response in patients with those covariates (RR 1.19 for morphine, 4.11 for STEMI and 5.73 for morphine and STEMI, all three p < 0.001). By increasing ticagrelor dosage, the negative morphine effect was reversible in patients without STEMI and just limited in patients with STEMI.

CONCLUSION

The developed population PK/PD model confirmed the negative impact of morphine administration and presence of STEMI on ticagrelor PK and antiplatelet effect. Increasing ticagrelor doses seems effective in morphine users without STEMI, whereas the STEMI effect is not entirely reversible.

Outcomes of Patients with Opioid-Related Diagnoses in Acute Coronary Syndrome: a National Inpatient Sample-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and opioid use are both major causes of morbidity and mortality globally. Although epidemiological studies point to increased risk of ACS in opioid users, in-hospital management and outcomes are unknown for this population when presenting with ACS. We sought to determine whether there are differences for in-hospital outcomes and management of ACS for those with and without opioid-related diagnoses (ORD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

From the National Inpatient Sample database, we extracted patients hospitalized between 2012 and 2016 for ACS. The primary independent variable was ORD by International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, codes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were cardiac arrest, receipt of angiogram, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Statistical comparisons were performed using χ2 test and Student's t test. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the independent association between ORD and outcomes of interest. Among the estimated 5.8 million admissions for ACS, the proportion of patients with ORD increased over the study period (p for trend < 0.01). Compared to patients without ORD presenting with ACS, patients with ORD were younger with fewer cardiovascular risk factors. Yet, in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with ORD presenting with ACS (AOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.26-1.48). Patients with ORD were more likely to experience in-hospital cardiac arrest (AOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.23-1.63) and less likely to undergo angiogram (AOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.38-0.45) or PCI (AOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.28-0.32).

CONCLUSION

Despite evidence of increased risk of mortality and cardiac arrest, patients with ORD admitted for ACS are less likely to receive ACS management.

Antithrombotic and anticoagulation therapies in cardiogenic shock: a critical review of the published literature

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex multifactorial clinical syndrome, developing as a continuum, and progressing from the initial insult (underlying cause) to the subsequent occurrence of organ failure and death. There is a large phenotypic variability in CS, as a result of the diverse aetiologies, pathogenetic mechanisms, haemodynamics, and stages of severity. Although early revascularization remains the most important intervention for CS in settings of acute myocardial infarction, the administration of timely and effective antithrombotic therapy is critical to improving outcomes in these patients. In addition, other clinical settings or non-acute myocardial infarction aetiologies, associated with high thrombotic risk, may require specific regimens of short-term or long-term antithrombotic therapy. In CS, altered tissue perfusion, inflammation, and multi-organ dysfunction induce unpredictable alterations to antithrombotic drugs' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Other interventions used in the management of CS, such as mechanical circulatory support, renal replacement therapies, or targeted temperature management, influence both thrombotic and bleeding risks and may require specific antithrombotic strategies. In order to optimize safety and efficacy of these therapies in CS, antithrombotic management should be more adapted to CS clinical scenario or specific device, with individualized antithrombotic regimens in terms of type of treatment, dose, and duration. In addition, patients with CS require a close and appropriate monitoring of antithrombotic therapies to safely balance the increased risk of bleeding and thrombosis.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Approved and Investigational P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists

Coronary artery disease remains the major cause of mortality worldwide. Antiplatelet drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are cornerstone treatments for the prevention of thrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease. Clopidogrel has long been the gold standard but has major pharmacological limitations such as a slow onset and long duration of effect, as well as weak platelet inhibition with high inter-individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. There has been a strong need to develop potent P2Y12 receptor antagonists with more favorable pharmacological properties. Prasugrel and ticagrelor are more potent and have a faster onset of action; however, they have shown an increased bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel. Cangrelor is highly potent and has a very rapid onset and offset of effect; however, its indication is limited to P2Y12 antagonist-naïve patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Two novel P2Y12 receptor antagonists are currently in clinical development, namely vicagrel and selatogrel. Vicagrel is an analog of clopidogrel with enhanced and more efficient formation of its active metabolite. Selatogrel is characterized by a rapid onset of action following subcutaneous administration and developed for early treatment of a suspected acute myocardial infarction. This review article describes the clinical pharmacology profile of marketed P2Y12 receptor antagonists and those under development focusing on pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and drug-drug interaction liability.

The Risk of Mortality Associated With Opioid Use in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AIMS

The impact of opioids in acute heart failure (AHF) is unclear. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the mortality risk associated with opioid use in AHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science Core Collection, and SCIELO (December 2019) for randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating the impact of opioids in in-hospital and 30-day mortality in patients with AHF. Data were screened, extracted, and appraised by 2 independent reviewers. A random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was performed and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistics. Six observational retrospective studies with 151,735 participants were included. Pooled results showed a statistical significant association between morphine and in-hospital mortality (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.01-3.13; I2 = 92%; 6 studies) and 30-day mortality (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.14-2.15; I2 = 0; 2 studies). Both outcomes were rated as having a serious risk of bias and had a very low Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioids seem to be associated with an increased risk of short-term mortality in AHF patients; however, the confidence in the estimated effect is very low, which highlights the need of further research to evaluate this question.

Satisfaction of Patients with Nonvitamin K Anticoagulants Compared to Vitamin K Antagonists: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

 To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the satisfaction of patients receiving nonvitamin K anticoagulants (NOACs), compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

METHODS

 We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Two reviewers screened, extracted, and appraised data independently. We pooled data using a random-effects model. Outcome included treatment satisfaction, which was assessed by scores of Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS), Anticlot Treatment Scale (ACTS), Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire 2 (PACT-Q2), or Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II (TSQM-VII) and their domains reported with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We followed MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

 We included four RCTs and 16 observational studies, enrolling 18,684 participants overall. Compared with VKAs, treatment with NOACs improved the ACTS Burdens score by 4.21 points (95% CI: 2.99-5.43, I ² = 95%, combined n = 6,180), and ACTS Benefits by 0.49 points (95% CI: 0.18-0.81, I ² = 85%, combined n = 6,171). Switching from VKAs to NOACs improved the ACTS Burdens score by 5.33 points (95% CI: 3.53-7.14, combined n = 3,097). Compared with VKAs, treatment with NOACs improved the TSQM-VII Global Satisfaction score by 6.86 points (95% CI: 3.00-10.73, combined n = 5,535).

CONCLUSION

 In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism, NOAC treatment is associated with greater satisfaction compared with VKAs. The switch from VKAs to NOACs was associated with improved patients' satisfaction. These effects were largely due to a lower degree of treatment burden with NOAC treatment.

Hypnosis Versus Placebo During Atrial Flutter Ablation: The PAINLESS Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the superiority of hypnosis versus placebo on pain perception and morphine consumption during typical atrial flutter (AFL) ablation.

BACKGROUND

AFL ablation commonly requires intravenous opioid for analgesia, which can be associated with adverse outcomes. Hypnosis is an alternative technique with rising interest, but robust data in electrophysiological procedures are lacking.

METHODS

This single center, randomized controlled trial compared hypnosis and placebo during AFl ablation. In addition to the randomized intervention, all patients were treated according to the institution's standard of care analgesia protocol (administration of 1 mg of intravenous morphine in case of self-reported pain ≥5 on an 11-point numeric rating scale or on demand). The primary endpoint was perceived pain quantified by patients using a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Between October 2017 and September 2019, 113 patients (mean age 70 ± 12 years, 21% women) were randomized to hypnosis (n = 56) or placebo (n = 57). Mean pain score was 4.0 ± 2.2 in the hypnosis group versus 5.5 ± 1.8 in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Pain perception, assessed every 5 min during the whole procedure, was consistently lower in the hypnosis group. Patients' sedation scores were also better in the hypnosis group than in the placebo group (8.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.4 ± 2.5; p < 0.001). Finally, morphine requirements were significantly lower in the hypnosis group (1.3 ± 1.3 mg) compared with the placebo group (3.6 ± 1.8 mg; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first randomized trial, hypnosis during AFL ablation was superior to placebo for alleviating pain and reducing morphine consumption.

Dopamine receptor D3 agonist (Pramipexole) reduces morphine-induced cardiac fibrosis

Morphine is routinely used for pain management in heart failure patients. However, extended morphine exposure associates with major adverse cardiovascular events. Reports link the dopamine receptor D2-family with morphine-induced nociception modulation. This study first assessed whether morphine induces cardiac remodeling in healthy mice, then whether DRD3 agonist (DRD3ag, D2-family member) adjunct therapy prevents morphine-induced cardiac remodeling. Mice received morphine (2 mg/kg/day i. p.) for 7 days (D7) and were either euthanized at D7 or kept 7 more days without morphine (i.e. withdrawal period, D8-D14): G1, morphine; G2, morphine/DRD3ag; G3, morphine + withdrawal; G4, morphine/DRD3ag + withdrawal; G5, morphine + withdrawal/DRD3ag. A separate cohort of animals were used as naïve tissues. We evaluated functional and molecular parameters of cardiac remodeling. Although we did not observe significant differences in systolic function, morphine induced both interstitial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Interestingly, DRD3ag abolished these effects. Compared to naïve tissues, collagen 1 increased after withdrawal in G3 and G4 and collagen 3 increased in G1-G4 but at higher levels in G1 and G2. Only G5 did not show collagen differences compared to naïve, suggesting DRD3ag treatment during withdrawal may be beneficial and prevent morphine-induced fibrosis. Smad2/3 phosphorylation increased during withdrawal, indicating a likely upstream pathway for the observed morphine-induced fibrosis. Overall, our data suggest that DRD3ag adjunct therapy decreases morphine-induced adverse cardiac remodeling.

Nitrous oxide/oxygen plus acetaminophen versus morphine in ST elevation myocardial infarction: open-label, cluster-randomized, non-inferiority study

Background

Studies have shown disparate results on the consequences of morphine use in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). No study has evaluated alternative treatments that could be at least non-inferior to morphine without its potentially damaging consequences for myocardial function and platelet reactivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether nitrous oxide/oxygen plus intravenous acetaminophen (NOO-A) is non-inferior to morphine to control chest pain in STEMI patients.

Methods

This multicenter, open-label, cluster-randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study compared NOO-A with morphine in 684 prehospital patients with ongoing suspected STEMI of < 12 h duration and a pain rating score ≥ 4. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving pain relief (numeric rating score ≤ 3) after 30 min. Secondary safety endpoints included serious adverse events and death at 30 days.

Results

The median baseline pain score was 7.0 in both groups. The primary endpoint occurred in 51.7% of the NOO-A group and 73.6% of the morphine group (absolute risk difference − 21.7%; 95% confidence interval − 29.6 to − 13.8). At 30 days, the rate of serious adverse events was 16.0 and 18.8% in the NOO-A and morphine groups respectively (p = NS). The rate of death was 1.8% (NOO-A group) and 3.8% (morphine group) (p = NS).

Conclusion

Analgesia provided by NOO-A was inferior to morphine at 30 min in patients with acute STEMI in the prehospital setting. Rates of serious adverse events did not differ between groups.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02198378.

Inhibition of DRG-TRPV1 upregulation in myocardial ischemia contributes to exogenous cardioprotection

Myocardium ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is the major cause of postoperative cardiac dysfunction. While intrathecal morphine preconditioning (ITMP) can reduce IRI in animals, the molecular processes underlying IRI and ITMP remain elusive. Transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) is highly expressed in cardiac sensory neurons and has a crucial role in detecting myocardial ischemia. This study aimed to determine the role of up-regulated dorsal root ganglion (DRG)-TRPV1 in IRI and whether its inhibition contributes to ITMP-induced cardioprotection. Animal model of IRI was established by left coronary artery occlusion (30 min) and reperfusion (2 h) in rats. Intrathecal intubation was prepared for morphine preconditioning, TRPV1-shRNA or selective TRPV1 antagonist administration. After IRI, both protein and phosphorylation levels of TRPV1 were significantly increased, and the immunofluorescence intensity of TRPV1 was increased and colocalized with μ-opioid receptors in DRG. Intrathecal pre-administration of either TRPV1-shRNA or TRPV1 antagonist significantly reduced myocardial injury and the upregulation of TRPV1 in DRG induced by IRI. Simultaneously, ITMP significantly suppressed TRPV1 protein expression and phosphorylation in DRG, as well as the heart infarct size and arrhythmia score caused by IRI. The suppression of TRPV1 elevation and activation by ITMP were reversed by intrathecal injection of the selective μ receptor antagonist. Furthermore, IRI elevated DRG cAMP, while intrathecal administration of the selective cAMP-PKA inhibitor reduced myocardial injury. Finally, we showed that activation of opioid receptor by morphine inhibited PKA activator-induced TRPV1 channel activity at the cellular level. These findings suggest that the elevation and activation of TRPV1 in DRG during myocardial ischemia-reperfusion might be responsible for cardiac injury. ITMP exerts cardioprotection by inhibiting DRG-TRPV1 activity via modulation cAMP. Therefore, inhibition of TRPV1 upregulation in DRG might be used as a novel therapeutic mechanism for myocardium ischemia-reperfusion injury.