Effects of tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: meta-analysis on randomised controlled trials

Tolvaptan for water retention in heart failure: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review is to collect, appraise, and synthesize existing evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) on the effectiveness of tolvaptan for water retention in heart failure.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, web of science, Cochrane reviews for SRs/Mas published between the databases' establishment to November 17, 2021. All the records were managed with Endnote 20. Standardized forms were used to extract data. Revman 5.3 was used to make forest plots to show the characteristics of outcomes. The methodological and evidence quality were respectively evaluated by AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendation of Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system.

RESULTS

A total of 9 SRs/Mas between 2015 to 2020 met inclusion criteria. Serum sodium concentration and urine output were considered as primary outcomes and body weight change and all-cause mortality as second outcomes. Through conducting forest plots, it appeared that tolvaptan brought more positive effect than conventional therapies. It was pessimistic when it comes to the quality of the 9 studies. all the 9 articles were rated as low-quality because AMSTAR 2 evaluation showed that they each had at least one critical item (items 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15) defect. Besides, every article had a few non-critical item defects too. The result of GRADE assessment was not optimistic, so the overall quality of the evidences was low as well.

CONCLUSION

Tolvaptan can be recommended for water retention in HF patients, but more evidence is needed.

Prognostic utility of the prognostic nutritional index combined with serum sodium level in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Both malnutrition and hyponatremia (serum sodium <135 mmol/L) can be induced by the impaired absorption function of the edematous intestinal wall caused by heart failure (HF) and are prognostic factors of mortality in HF. However, little is known about the interrelationship of nutritional status and hyponatremia in mortality risk prediction in HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study enrolled 2882 HF patients admitted to the HF care unit of Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China from 2008 to 2018; 71.3% were male and the mean age was 56.64 ± 15.96 years. Nutritional status was assessed by prognostic nutritional index (PNI), calculated as serum albumin (g/L) + 5 × total lymphocyte count (10⁹/L). Lower PNI indicates worse nutritional status. Patients were divided into 8 groups based on baseline PNI quartiles (Q1: <43.6, Q2: 43.6-48.55, Q3: 48.55-63.25, Q4: >63.25) and sodium level (normal sodium and hyponatremia). After adjustment, patients in the PNI Q1 associated with hyponatremia had a 2.12-fold higher risk of all-cause death (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-2.70) compared with those in the PNI Q4 with normal sodium. A refinement in risk prediction was observed after adding PNI quartile and serum sodium category to the original model (ΔC-statistic = 0.018, 95% CI: 0.007-0.025; net re-classification index = 0.459, 95% CI: 0.371-0.548; integrated discrimination improvement = 0.025, 95% CI: 0.018-0.032).

CONCLUSION

HF patients with both the lowest PNI quartile and hyponatremia are at higher risk of all-cause mortality. The combination of PNI and serum sodium level enhanced the predictive value for all-cause mortality in hospitalized HF patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02664818.

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Tolvaptan and Furosemide in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome and Refractory Edema: A Prospective Interventional Study

OBJECTIVE

Severe edema in children with nephrotic syndrome is often refractory to conventional diuretics. Tolvaptan has been used satisfactorily for managing edema in patients with heart failure and cirrhosis. The safety and efficacy of combination therapy with oral tolvaptan and intravenous (IV) furosemide was assessed in patients with furosemide refractory edema.

METHODS

Patients, aged 5-18 y with nephrotic syndrome and severe edema, were screened for eligibility. After excluding hypovolemia, patients received IV furosemide (3-4 mg/kg/d) for 48 h. Those refractory to IV furosemide (weight loss < 3%) received tolvaptan (0.5-1 mg/kg once daily) and IV furosemide for the next 48 h. Parameters were compared between 48 h of furosemide alone and combination therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (18 boys) with mean age of 8.0 ± 3.0 y were enrolled. Urine volume significantly increased with combination therapy as compared to furosemide therapy (mean difference: 1.2 mL/kg/h; 95% CI: 0.8-1.65 mL/kg/h) (p < 0.001). Compared to therapy with furosemide alone, combination therapy resulted in significant reduction in body weight from 26.9 ± 10.3 kg to 24.8 ± 9.7 kg (p < 0.001). Estimated glomerular filtration rate did not change (p = 0.81) but serum sodium increased from 135.7 ± 3.3 mEq/L to 140.4 ± 4.8 mEq/L (p < 0.001) with combination therapy; 2 patients showed asymptomatic hypernatremia.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oral tolvaptan and IV furosemide is effective in augmenting diuresis and reducing weight in patients with furosemide refractory edema but requires monitoring of electrolytes and volume status.

Ultrafiltration for acute heart failure

BACKGROUND

Pharmacotherapies such as loop diuretics are the cornerstone treatment for acute heart failure (AHF), but resistance and poor response can occur. Ultrafiltration (UF) is an alternative therapy to reduce congestion, however its benefits, efficacy and safety are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of UF compared to diuretic therapy on clinical outcomes such as mortality and rehospitalisation rates.

SEARCH METHODS

We undertook a systematic search in June 2021 of the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science CPCI-S and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched the WHO ICTRP platform in October 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared UF to diuretics in adults with AHF.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for any further information, and language interpreters to translate texts. We assessed risk of bias in included studies using Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 trials involving 1190 people. We included people who had clinical signs of acute hypervolaemia. We excluded critically unwell people such as those with ischaemia or haemodynamic instability. Mean age ranged from 57.5 to 75 years, and the setting was a mix of single and multi-centre. Two trials researched UF as a complimentary therapy to diuretics, while the remaining trials withheld diuretic use during UF. There was high risk of bias in some studies, particularly with deviations from the intended protocols from high cross-overs as well as missing outcome data for long-term follow-up.  We are uncertain about the effect of UF on all-cause mortality at 30 days or less (risk ratio (RR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 2.85; 3 studies, 286 participants; very low-certainty evidence). UF may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality at the longest available follow-up (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.36; 9 studies, 987 participants; low-certainty evidence). UF may reduce all-cause rehospitalisation at 30 days or less (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.09; 3 studies, 337 participants; low-certainty evidence). UF may slightly reduce all-cause rehospitalisation at longest available follow-up (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.05; 6 studies, 612 participants; low-certainty evidence). UF may reduce heart failure-related rehospitalisation at 30 days or less (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.04; 2 studies, 395 participants; low-certainty evidence). UF probably reduces heart failure-related rehospitalisation at longest available follow-up, with a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial effect (NNTB) of 10 (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.90; 4 studies, 636 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).  No studies measured need for mechanical ventilation.  UF may have little or no effect on serum creatinine change at 30 days since discharge (mean difference (MD) 14%, 95% CI -12% to 40%; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence). UF may increase the risk of new initiation of renal replacement therapy at longest available follow-up (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.75; 4 studies, 332 participants; low-certainty evidence).  There is an uncertain effect of UF on the risk of complications from central line insertion in hospital (RR 4.16, 95% CI 1.30 to 13.30; 6 studies, 779 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review summarises the latest evidence on UF in AHF. Moderate-certainty evidence shows UF probably reduces heart failure-related rehospitalisation in the long term, with an NNTB of 10. UF may reduce all-cause rehospitalisation at 30 days or less and at longest available follow-up. The effect of UF on all-cause mortality at 30 days or less is unclear, and it may have little effect on all-cause mortality in the long-term.  While UF may have little or no effect on serum creatinine change at 30 days, it may increase the risk of new initiation of renal replacement therapy in the long term. The effect on complications from central line insertion is unclear.  There is insufficient evidence to determine the true impact of UF on AHF. Future research should evaluate UF as an adjunct therapy, focusing on outcomes such as heart failure-related rehospitalisation, cardiac mortality and renal outcomes at medium- to long-term follow-up.

Correction of serum chloride concentration in dogs with congestive heart failure

Background

Hypochloremia associated with congestive heart failure (CHF) in dogs is likely multifactorial. Loop diuretics cause 1:2 sodium [Na⁺]:chloride [Cl⁻] loss, whereas water retention causes a 1:1 [Na⁺]:[Cl⁻] dilution. Mathematical [Cl⁻] correction separates these effects on [Cl⁻].

Hypothesis

We hypothesized that corrected [Cl⁻] (c[Cl⁻]) would not differ from measured [Cl⁻] (m[Cl⁻]) in dogs with controlled CHF because of loop diuretics, and dogs with refractory CHF would have higher c[Cl⁻] than m[Cl⁻], indicating relative water excess.

Animals

Seventy‐one client‐owned dogs with acquired heart disease, without CHF (NO‐CHF), 76 with Stage C CHF and 24 with Stage D CHF.

Methods

Clinicopathological data from a previous study were retrospectively analyzed. Corrected [Cl⁻], m[Cl⁻], and differences were compared among NO‐CHF, Stage C CHF, and Stage D CHF, using the formula: c[Cl⁻] = (mid‐reference range [Na⁺]/measured [Na⁺]) × m[Cl⁻].

Results

Corrected [Cl⁻] and m[Cl⁻] were lower in Stage D vs Stage C and NO‐CHF (all P < .0001). The c[Cl⁻] was higher than m[Cl⁻] in Stage D (P < .0001) but not Stage C or NO‐CHF. Median difference between c[Cl⁻] and m[Cl⁻] was higher for Stage D vs Stage C (P = .0003). No hypochloremic Stage D dogs had normal c[Cl⁻], but 11/24 had [Cl⁻] that was increased by >2 mmol/L.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Serum [Cl⁻] increased after mathematical correction in Stage D CHF dogs but not in Stage C and NO‐CHF dogs. Although c[Cl⁻] was higher than m[Cl⁻] in Stage D dogs supportive of relative water excess, hypochloremia persisted, consistent with concurrent loop diuretic effects on electrolytes. Future study correlating c[Cl⁻] to antidiuretic hormone concentrations is warranted.

Tolvaptan-induced hypernatremia related to low serum potassium level accompanying high blood pressure in patients with acute decompensated heart failure

Backgrounds

Tolvaptan significantly increases urine volume in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF); serum sodium level increases due to aquaresis in almost all cases. We aimed to elucidate clinical factors associated with hypernatremia in ADHF patients treated with tolvaptan.

Methods

We enrolled 117 ADHF patients treated with tolvaptan in addition to standard therapy. We examined differences in clinical factors at baseline between patients with and without hypernatremia in the initial three days of hospitalization.

Results

Systolic (p = 0.045) and diastolic (p = 0.004) blood pressure, serum sodium level (p = 0.002), and negative water balance (p = 0.036) were significantly higher and serum potassium level (p = 0.026) was significantly lower on admission day in patients with hypernatremia (n = 22). In multivariate regression analysis, hypernatremia was associated with low serum potassium level (p = 0.034). Among patients with serum potassium level ≤ 3.8 mEq/L, the cutoff value obtained using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, those with hypernatremia related to tolvaptan treatment showed significantly higher diastolic blood pressure on admission day (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

In tolvaptan treatment combined with standard therapy in ADHF patients, serum potassium level ≤ 3.8 mEq/L may be a determinant factor for hypernatremia development. Among hypokalemic patients, those with higher diastolic blood pressure on admission may be carefully managed to prevent hypernatremia.

Tolvaptan add-on therapy in patients with acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of tolvaptan as an add-on to traditional diuretics in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined AHF patients treated with tolvaptan as a combination therapy with traditional diuretics published on or before December 2, 2019. Efficacy indicators such as improved dyspnea, reduced edema, and changes in urine output and body weight were evaluated. In-hospital mortality and worsening renal function (WRF) were measured as safety indicators. Data from the published literature included in this study were independently extracted by two reviewers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included RCTs. Twelve RCTs involving 5577 patients admitted for AHF were included. Compared with traditional diuretics alone, add-on tolvaptan significantly relieved dyspnea, reduced weight, increased total urine volume and changes in urine volume from baseline, reduced edema, and increased serum sodium concentration in the short term without increasing the mortality. Most importantly, a low dose of tolvaptan (7.5-15 mg/d) significantly reduced the incidence of WRF, while a high dose (30 mg/d) had the opposite effect. Short-term add-on tolvaptan in hospitalized AHF patients could significantly relieve shortness of breath, reduce body weight, improve edema, and increase urine output and serum sodium concentrations without increasing mortality. The protective effects of add-on tolvaptan against WRF, however, were observed at low doses, but not at high doses.