1
|
Vicentini C, Libero G, Cugudda E, Gardois P, Zotti CM, Bert F. Barriers to the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in long-term care facilities: a scoping review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2024:dkae146. [PMID: 38870077 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) present specific challenges for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. A growing body of literature is dedicated to AMS in LTCFs. OBJECTIVES We aimed to summarize barriers to the implementation of full AMS programmes, i.e. a set of clinical practices, accompanied by recommended change strategies. METHODS A scoping review was conducted through Ovid-MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane Central. Studies addressing barriers to the implementation of full AMS programmes in LTCFs were included. Implementation barriers described in qualitative studies were identified and coded, and main themes were identified using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS The electronic search revealed 3904 citations overall. Of these, 57 met the inclusion criteria. All selected studies were published after 2012, and the number of references per year progressively increased, reaching a peak in 2020. Thematic analysis of 13 qualitative studies identified three main themes: (A) LTCF organizational culture, comprising (A1) interprofessional tensions, (A2) education provided in silos, (A3) lack of motivation and (A4) resistance to change; (B) resources, comprising (B1) workload and staffing levels, (B2) diagnostics, (B3) information technology resources and (B4) funding; and (C) availability of and access to knowledge and skills, including (C1) surveillance data, (C2) infectious disease/AMS expertise and (C3) data analysis skills. CONCLUSIONS Addressing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in LTCFs through AMS programmes is an area of growing interest. Hopefully, this review could be helpful for intervention developers and implementers who want to build on the most recent evidence from the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costanza Vicentini
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Giulia Libero
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Eleonora Cugudda
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Gardois
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, Medical Library 'Ferdinando Rossi', University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Carla Maria Zotti
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Bert
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bridey C, Bocquier A, Bonnay S, Pulcini C, Thilly N. Nursing home nurses' opinions on the potential evolution of their role in antibiotic stewardship: A French national cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33:1849-1861. [PMID: 38093495 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To assess French nursing home nurses' opinions on the potential evolution of their antibiotic stewardship role, facilitators and barriers, and nurses' characteristics associated with their opinion toward new roles regarding antibiotic prescribing. DESIGN We conducted a cross-sectional study in French nursing homes with ≥20 beds and for which an email address was available in a national database managed by the French government between May and June 2022. METHODS A self-administered internet-based questionnaire of 43 closed-ended Likert items was sent to directors of eligible nursing homes by email asking them to forward the link to the questionnaire to the nurses and head nurses of their institution. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and χ2 tests. RESULTS 7215 nursing homes were sent the online questionnaire; 1090 participants completed it partially or totally and 923 fully filled in the questionnaire. A majority of nurses supported strengthening and expanding their antibiotic stewardship role. Regarding new roles, over 70% agreed that nurses could collect urine samples to perform a urine culture on their own initiative, prescribe microbiological laboratory tests, and change the drug formulation or the administration route of the antibiotic prescribed by the general practitioner. One-third declared that they could initiate antibiotics for some infections and/or change the empirical antibiotic treatment prescribed by the general practitioner. Nurses from public nursing homes with connection to a hospital (27.5% vs. >35% for other status) and with recent experience in nursing homes (31% for <5 years of practice vs. 41% for 10 years or more) were less likely to agree to prescribe antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS This quantitative questionnaire survey identified potential new nurses' roles in antibiotic stewardship that seem to be acceptable and feasible for participants. These new nurses' roles need to be explored in future experimentations before considering implementation. REPORTING METHOD The study adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and followed the STROBE reporting guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION A self-administered internet-based questionnaire was sent to directors of eligible nursing homes by email asking them to forward the link to the questionnaire to the nurses and head nurses of their institution. Nurses and head nurses who were interested and willing could complete the questionnaire online partially or fully. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION This study is not a clinical trial and is not eligible for trial registration. We used another suitable study registration site, the Center for Open Science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Céline Pulcini
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France
- Centre régional en antibiothérapie du Grand Est AntibioEst, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Nathalie Thilly
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France
- Département Méthodologie, Promotion, Investigation, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Singh S, Degeling C, Drury P, Montgomery A, Caputi P, Deane FP. Nurses' Anxiety Mediates the Relationship between Clinical Tolerance to Uncertainty and Antibiotic Initiation Decisions in Residential Aged-Care Facilities. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:415-425. [PMID: 38532728 PMCID: PMC11102643 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241239871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
HIGHLIGHTS The impact of non-clinical factors (e.g., resident and family preferences) on prescribing is well-established. There is a gap in the literature regarding the mechanisms through which these preferences are experienced as pressure by prescribers within the unique context of residential aged-care facilities (RACFs).A significant relationship was found between nurses' anxiety, clinical tolerance of uncertainty, and the perceived need for antibiotics and assessment.As such, there is a need to expand stewardship beyond education alone to include interventions that help nurses manage uncertainty and anxiety and include other stakeholders (e.g., family members) when making clinical decisions in the RACF setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saniya Singh
- School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW, Australia
| | - Chris Degeling
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW, Australia
| | - Peta Drury
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW, Australia
| | - Amy Montgomery
- School of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Caputi
- School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Frank P. Deane
- School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Conlin M, Hamard M, Agrinier N, Birgand G. Assessment of implementation strategies adopted for antimicrobial stewardship interventions in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024; 30:431-444. [PMID: 38141820 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is influenced by multi-level factors (resident, organizational, and external) making their effectiveness sensitive to the implementation context. OBJECTIVES This study assessed the strategies adopted for the implementation of AMS interventions in LTCFs, whether they considered organizational characteristics, and their effectiveness. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases until April 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Articles covering implementation of AMS interventions in LTCFs. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for empirical studies. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS Data were collected on AMS interventions and context characteristics (e.g. type of facility, staffing, and residents). Implementation strategies and outcomes were mapped according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and validated taxonomy for implementation outcomes. Implementation and clinical effectiveness were assessed according to the primary and secondary outcomes results provided in each study. RESULTS Among 48 studies included in the analysis, 19 (40%) used implementation strategies corresponding to one to three ERIC domains, including education and training (n = 36/48, 75%), evaluative and iterative strategies (n = 24/48, 50%), and support clinicians (n = 23/48, 48%). Only 8/48 (17%) studies made use of implementation theories, frameworks, or models. Fidelity and sustainability were reported respectively in 21 (70%) and 3 (10%) of 27 studies providing implementation outcomes. Implementation strategy was considered effective in 11/27 (41%) studies, mainly including actions to improve use (n = 6/11, 54%) and education (n = 4/11, 36%). Of the 42 interventions, 18/42 (43%) were deemed clinically effective. Among 21 clinically effective studies, implementation was deemed effective in four and partially effective in five. Two studies were clinically effective despite having non-effective implementation. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of AMS interventions in LTCFs largely differed according to the interventions' content and implementation strategies adopted. Implementation frameworks should be considered to adapt and tailor interventions and strategies to the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michèle Conlin
- Regional Center for Infection Prevention and Control Pays de la Loire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Marie Hamard
- Unité de gériatrie Aiguë, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Nelly Agrinier
- Université de Lorraine, Inserm, INSPIIRE, F-54000 Nancy, France; CHRU-Nancy, Inserm, Université de Lorraine, CIC, Epidémiologie clinique, Nancy, France.
| | - Gabriel Birgand
- Regional Center for Infection Prevention and Control Pays de la Loire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bocquier A, Erkilic B, Babinet M, Pulcini C, Agrinier N. Resident-, prescriber-, and facility-level factors associated with antibiotic use in long-term care facilities: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2024; 13:29. [PMID: 38448955 PMCID: PMC10918961 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-024-01385-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship programmes are needed in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) to tackle antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to identify factors associated with antibiotic use in LTCFs. Such information would be useful to guide antimicrobial stewardship programmes. METHOD We conducted a systematic review of studies retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycINFO, APA PsycTherapy, ScienceDirect and Web of Science. We included quantitative studies that investigated factors associated with antibiotic use (i.e., antibiotic prescribing by health professionals, administration by LTCF staff, or use by residents). Participants were LTCF residents, their family, and/or carers. We performed a qualitative narrative synthesis of the findings. RESULTS Of the 7,591 screened records, we included 57 articles. Most studies used a longitudinal design (n = 34/57), investigated resident-level (n = 29/57) and/or facility-level factors (n = 32/57), and fewer prescriber-level ones (n = 8/57). Studies included two types of outcome: overall volume of antibiotic prescriptions (n = 45/57), inappropriate antibiotic prescription (n = 10/57); two included both types. Resident-level factors associated with a higher volume of antibiotic prescriptions included comorbidities (5 out of 8 studies which investigated this factor found a statistically significant association), history of infection (n = 5/6), potential signs of infection (e.g., fever, n = 4/6), positive urine culture/dipstick results (n = 3/4), indwelling urinary catheter (n = 12/14), and resident/family request for antibiotics (n = 1/1). At the facility-level, the volume of antibiotic prescriptions was positively associated with staff turnover (n = 1/1) and prevalence of after-hours medical practitioner visits (n = 1/1), and negatively associated with LTCF hiring an on-site coordinating physician (n = 1/1). At the prescriber-level, higher antibiotic prescribing was associated with high prescription rate for antibiotics in the previous year (n = 1/1). CONCLUSIONS Improving infection prevention and control, and diagnostic practices as part of antimicrobial stewardship programmes remain critical steps to reduce antibiotic prescribing in LTCFs. Once results confirmed by further studies, implementing institutional changes to limit staff turnover, ensure the presence of a professional accountable for the antimicrobial stewardship activities, and improve collaboration between LTCFs and external prescribers may contribute to reduce antibiotic prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Bocquier
- Université de Lorraine, Inserm, INSPIIRE, Nancy, F-54000, France.
| | - Berkehan Erkilic
- Université de Lorraine, Inserm, INSPIIRE, Nancy, F-54000, France
| | - Martin Babinet
- CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC, Epidémiologie clinique, Nancy, F-54000, France
| | - Céline Pulcini
- Université de Lorraine, Inserm, INSPIIRE, Nancy, F-54000, France
- Centre régional en antibiothérapie du Grand Est AntibioEst, Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, F-54000, France
| | - Nelly Agrinier
- Université de Lorraine, Inserm, INSPIIRE, Nancy, F-54000, France
- CHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC, Epidémiologie clinique, Nancy, F-54000, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lim LL, Williams K, Francis JJ, Wroth M, Breen J. Implementation of an intervention to reduce urine dipstick testing in aged care homes: a qualitative study of enablers and barriers, and strategies to enhance delivery. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081980. [PMID: 38431303 PMCID: PMC10910599 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The 'To Dip or Not to Dip' (TDONTD) intervention aims to reduce antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infection (UTI) by reducing low-value dipstick testing. The aims of this study were to use a qualitative approach to (1) evaluate potential influences on the delivery of the TDONTD intervention in Australian residential aged care homes (RACHs) by identifying perceived barriers and enablers to delivery and acceptance; and (2) propose intervention strategies to address barriers and enhance enablers. DESIGN A qualitative before-after process evaluation of a multisite implementation study using interviews with nurse and pharmacist implementers. SETTING This study was conducted in 12 Australian RACHs. PARTICIPANTS Participants included 17 on-site nurse champions and 4 pharmacists (existing contracted providers). INTERVENTION Resources from England's TDONTD intervention were adapted for an Australian context. Key resources delivered were case-based education, staff training video, clinical pathway and an audit tool. RESULTS Key barriers to TDONTD were beliefs about nursing capabilities in diagnosing infection, beliefs about consequences (fear of missing infection) and social influences (pressure from family, doctors and hospitals). Key enablers were perceived increased nurse and carer knowledge (around UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria), resources from a credible source, empowerment of nurse champions to apply knowledge and skills in delivering operational change initiatives, pharmacist-delivered education and organisational policy or process change. Of TDONTD's key components, the clinical pathway substituted dipstick testing in diagnosing UTI, delivery of case-based education was enhanced by their attendance and support of the intervention and the antibiotic audit tool generated feedback that champions shared with staff. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms the core components of TDONTD and strategies to enhance delivery and overcome barriers. To further reduce barriers to TDONTD, broader advocacy work is required to raise awareness of dipstick testing as a low-value test in older persons and by linking it to healthcare professionals and consumer education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyn-Li Lim
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Government Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Williams
- Australian Government Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Jill J Francis
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie Wroth
- Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juanita Breen
- University of Tasmania College of Health and Medicine, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eikelenboom-Boskamp A, van Loosbroek M, Lutke-Schipholt E, Nelissen-Vrancken M, Verkaaik M, Geels P, Natsch S, Voss A. A practice guide on antimicrobial stewardship in nursing homes. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2023; 12:120. [PMID: 37919782 PMCID: PMC10623834 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-023-01321-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
A practice guide to help nursing homes set up an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program was developed based on experiences gained during a project at one of the largest providers of elderly care in the South-east of the Netherlands. The guideline for the implementation of AMS in Dutch hospitals served as a starting point and were tailored to the unique characteristics of a nursing home setting. This practice guide offers recommendations and practical tools while emphasizing the importance of establishing a multidisciplinary approach to oversee AMS efforts. The recommendations and practical tools address various elements of AMS, including the basic conditions to initiate an AMS program and a comprehensive approach to embed an AMS program. This approach involves educating nurses and caregivers, informing volunteers and residents/their representatives, and the activities of an antibiotic team (A-team). The practice guide also highlights a feasible work process for the A-team. This process aims to achieve a culture of continuous learning and improvement that can enhance the overall quality of antibiotic prescribing rather than making individual adjustments to client prescriptions. Overall, this practice guide aims to help nursing homes establish an AMS program through collaborative efforts between involved physicians, pharmacists, clinical microbiologists, and infection control practitioners. The involved physician plays a crucial role in instilling a sense of urgency and developing a stepwise strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Eikelenboom-Boskamp
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- ZZG Care Group, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul Geels
- Dutch Institute for Rational Use of Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Natsch
- The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB), Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Voss
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection- prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wilcox CR, Worswick L, Muller I, Moore A, Hayward G, Lown M, Moore M, Little P, Francis N. Feasibility of a placebo-controlled trial of antibiotics for possible urinary tract infection in care homes: a qualitative interview study. BJGP Open 2023; 7:BJGPO.2023.0014. [PMID: 37225255 PMCID: PMC10646207 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2023.0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis of suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) in care and nursing home residents is commonly based on vague non-localising symptoms (for example, confusion), potentially leading to inappropriate antibiotic prescription. The safety of withholding antibiotics in such cases could be addressed by a randomised controlled trial (RCT); however, this would require close monitoring of residents, and support from care home staff, clinicians, residents, and families. AIM To explore the views of residential care and nursing home staff (herein referred to as care home staff) and primary care clinicians on the feasibility and design of a potential RCT of antibiotics for suspected UTI in care home residents, with no localising urinary symptoms. DESIGN & SETTING A qualitative interview study with primary care clinicians and care home staff in the UK. METHOD Semi-structured interviews with 16 care home staff and 11 primary care clinicians were thematically analysed. RESULTS Participants were broadly supportive of the proposed RCT. The safety of residents was a priority and there was strong support for using the RESTORE2 (Recognise Early Soft Signs, Take Observations, Respond, Escalate) assessment tool to monitor residents; however, there were concerns about associated training requirements, especially for night and temporary staff. Effective communication (with residents, families, and staff) was deemed essential, and carers were confident that residents and families would be supportive of the RCT if the rationale was clearly explained and safety systems were robust. There were mixed views on a placebo-controlled design. The perceived additional burden was seen as a potential barrier, and the use of temporary staff and the out-of-hours period were highlighted as potential risk areas. CONCLUSION The support for this potential trial was encouraging. Future development will need to prioritise resident safety (especially in the out-of-hours period), effective communication, and minimising additional burden on staff to optimise recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Wilcox
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Louise Worswick
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ingrid Muller
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Abigail Moore
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gail Hayward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Lown
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nick Francis
- Primary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Farooqui M, Iqbal Z, Sadiq A, Raziq A, Alshammari MS, Iqbal Q, Haider S, Saleem F. Hospital Pharmacists' Viewpoint on Quality Use of Antibiotics and Resistance: A Qualitative Exploration from a Tertiary Care Hospital of Quetta City, Pakistan. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1343. [PMID: 37627763 PMCID: PMC10451787 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12081343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Suboptimal antibiotics use and the development of antibiotic resistance is a universal calamity. The theoretical model of therapeutic efficacy correlates quality use of antibiotics with healthcare practitioners' understanding of antibiotic use and resistance. Keeping this phenomenon in mind, we aimed to evaluate hospital pharmacists' understanding of antibiotic use and resistance at a public healthcare institute in Quetta city, Pakistan. This was a qualitative study that employed a semi-structured interview guide for data extraction. The phenomenology-based approach commissioned in-depth, face-to-face interviews with hospital pharmacists stationed at the surgical unit of Sandeman Provincial Hospital, Quetta. The interviews were audio taped followed by transcribed verbatim and were then analyzed for thematic contents by the standard content analysis framework. Although the saturation was reached after the 10th interview, we conducted two additional interviews for definite validation. Content analysis revealed five major themes: (1) Defining antibiotics, quality use of antibiotics and resistance, (2) antibiotic use: awareness and concern, (3) antimicrobial resistance: awareness and concern, (4) responding to antibiotic use and resistance, and (5) barriers to quality use of antibiotics and prevention of antibiotic resistance. The knowledge of quality use of antibiotics and resistance was promising, and the respondents were eager to address the drastic situation. The respondents were aware of the critical situation and provided valuable insights that can offer valued input while promoting the quality use of antibiotics in a developing country. The current study managed to identify an adequate understanding of antibiotic use and resistance among hospital pharmacists. Additionally, prospective concerns and possible predictors of antibiotic resistance were also highlighted. The current findings must be disseminated to the policymakers and prescribers to take prompt restorative actions to address antibiotic use and the development of antibiotic resistance in a developing country like Pakistan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Farooqui
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia; (M.F.); (M.S.A.)
| | - Zaffar Iqbal
- Health Department, Government of Balochistan, Quetta 87100, Pakistan;
| | - Abdul Sadiq
- Jhalawan Medical College Khuzdar, Khuzdar 89100, Pakistan;
| | - Abdul Raziq
- Department of Statistics, University of Balochistan, Quetta 87300, Pakistan;
| | - Mohammed Salem Alshammari
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia; (M.F.); (M.S.A.)
| | - Qaiser Iqbal
- Faculty of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta 87300, Pakistan; (Q.I.); (S.H.)
| | - Sajjad Haider
- Faculty of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta 87300, Pakistan; (Q.I.); (S.H.)
| | - Fahad Saleem
- Faculty of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta 87300, Pakistan; (Q.I.); (S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wretman CJ, Boynton MH, Preisser JS, Zimmerman S, Kistler CE. Patient-level information underlying overdiagnosis of urinary tract infections in nursing homes: A discrete choice experiment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:1151-1154. [PMID: 36073169 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The overdiagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing home residents is a significant public health threat. Using a discrete choice experiment and a diagnostic guideline, we examined which patient-level information was associated with the overdiagnosis of UTIs and found that urinalysis results and lower urinary tract status were most associated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcella H Boynton
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John S Preisser
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Sheryl Zimmerman
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Christine E Kistler
- The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Okafor CM, Clogher P, Olson D, Niccolai L, Hadler J. Trends in and Risk Factors for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection, New Haven County, Connecticut, USA, 2015-2020. Emerg Infect Dis 2023; 29. [PMID: 37081745 PMCID: PMC10124664 DOI: 10.3201/eid2905.221294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (RCDI) causes an increased burden on the healthcare system. We calculated RCDI incidence and identified factors associated with RCDI cases in New Haven County, Connecticut, USA, during 2015-2020 by using data from population-based laboratory surveillance. A subset of C. difficile cases had complete chart reviews conducted for RCDI and potentially associated variables. RCDI was defined as a positive C. difficile specimen occurring 2-8 weeks after incident C. difficile infection. We compared cases with and without RCDI by using multiple regression. RCDI occurred in 12.0% of 4,301 chart-reviewed C. difficile cases, showing a U-shaped time trend with a sharp increase in 2020, mostly because of an increase in hospital-onset cases. Malignancy (odds ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.11-2.07]) and antecedent nitrofurantoin use (odds ratio 2.37 [95% CI 1.23-4.58]) were medical risk factors for RCDI. The 2020 increase may reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
|
12
|
Hartman EAR, van de Pol AC, Heltveit-Olsen SR, Lindbæk M, Høye S, Lithén SS, Sundvall PD, Sundvall S, Arnljots ES, Gunnarsson R, Kowalczyk A, Godycki-Cwirko M, Platteel TN, Groen WG, Monnier AA, Zuithoff NP, Verheij TJM, Hertogh CMPM. Effect of a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing for suspected urinary tract infections in frail older adults (ImpresU): pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in four European countries. BMJ 2023; 380:e072319. [PMID: 36813284 PMCID: PMC9943914 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether antibiotic prescribing for suspected urinary tract infections in frail older adults can be reduced through a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention. DESIGN Pragmatic, parallel, cluster randomised controlled trial, with a five month baseline period and a seven month follow-up period. SETTING 38 clusters consisting of one or more general practices (n=43) and older adult care organisations (n=43) in Poland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden, from September 2019 to June 2021. PARTICIPANTS 1041 frail older adults aged 70 or older (Poland 325, the Netherlands 233, Norway 276, Sweden 207), contributing 411 person years to the follow-up period. INTERVENTION Healthcare professionals received a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention consisting of a decision tool for appropriate antibiotic use, supported by a toolbox with educational materials. A participatory-action-research approach was used for implementation, with sessions for education, evaluation, and local tailoring of the intervention. The control group provided care as usual. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the number of antibiotic prescriptions for suspected urinary tract infections per person year. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of complications, all cause hospital referrals, all cause hospital admissions, all cause mortality within 21 days after suspected urinary tract infections, and all cause mortality. RESULTS The numbers of antibiotic prescriptions for suspected urinary tract infections in the follow-up period were 54 prescriptions in 202 person years (0.27 per person year) in the intervention group and 121 prescriptions in 209 person years (0.58 per person year) in the usual care group. Participants in the intervention group had a lower rate of receiving an antibiotic prescription for a suspected urinary tract infection compared with participants in the usual care group, with a rate ratio of 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.68). No differences between intervention and control group were observed in the incidence of complications (<0.01 v 0.05 per person year), hospital referrals (<0.01 v 0.05), admissions to hospital (0.01 v 0.05), and mortality (0 v 0.01) within 21 days after suspected urinary tract infections, nor in all cause mortality (0.26 v 0.26). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention safely reduced antibiotic prescribing for suspected urinary tract infections in frail older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03970356.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther A R Hartman
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Alma C van de Pol
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Silje Rebekka Heltveit-Olsen
- Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Morten Lindbæk
- Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigurd Høye
- Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sara Sofia Lithén
- Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pär-Daniel Sundvall
- General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Borås, Sweden
| | - Sofia Sundvall
- Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Borås, Sweden
| | - Egill Snaebjörnsson Arnljots
- General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Borås, Sweden
| | - Ronny Gunnarsson
- General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Borås, Sweden
| | - Anna Kowalczyk
- Centre for Family and Community Medicine, the Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Maciek Godycki-Cwirko
- Centre for Family and Community Medicine, the Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Tamara N Platteel
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wim G Groen
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annelie A Monnier
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas P Zuithoff
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Theo J M Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Cees M P M Hertogh
- Department of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carter EJ, Shang J, George M, DeForge C, Mackson G, Palace ZJ, Stone P. Nursing home residents' experiences and perceptions of antibiotic use: A qualitative descriptive study. Am J Infect Control 2023; 51:159-162. [PMID: 35697126 PMCID: PMC9734277 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotics are commonly used in the nursing home (NH) setting. Little is known of NH residents' perceptions and experiences regarding antibiotic use. METHODS This was a qualitative descriptive study. We conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with NH residents. Interview transcripts were analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS Twenty-six residents were interviewed. Four themes emerged: (1) perceived benefits and risks to antibiotics; (2) information needs regarding antibiotic treatment; (3) approaches to address information needs; and (4) resident involvement in antibiotic treatment decisions. The perceived benefits of antibiotics were described as symptom-relief and cure; risks included gastrointestinal symptoms and antibiotic resistance. Informational needs included the indication for antibiotics, risks and side-effects of antibiotics, and potential interactions between antibiotic treatments and medication regimens. Residents performed information seeking behaviors to address informational needs but described difficulty obtaining and recalling desired information. Diverse involvement in antibiotic treatment decisions were described, in which a subset of participants reported seeking antibiotics from their prescriber. CONCLUSIONS Future efforts aiming to improve collaborative decision making and antibiotic use in the NH setting should address the unmet information needs of NH residents regarding their antibiotic treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Grace Mackson
- Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Raban MZ, Gonzalez G, Nguyen AD, Newell BR, Li L, Seaman KL, Westbrook JI. Nudge interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e062688. [PMID: 36657758 PMCID: PMC9853249 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Antibiotic prescribing in primary care contributes significantly to antibiotic overuse. Nudge interventions alter the decision-making environment to achieve behaviour change without restricting options. Our objectives were to conduct a systematic review to describe the types of nudge interventions used to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care, their key features, and their effects on antibiotic prescribing overall. METHODS Medline, Embase and grey literature were searched for randomised trials or regression discontinuity studies in April 2021. Risk of bias was assessed independently by two researchers using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group's tool. Results were synthesised to report the percentage of studies demonstrating a reduction in overall antibiotic prescribing for different types of nudges. Effects of social norm nudges were examined for features that may enhance effectiveness. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included, testing 23 nudge interventions. Four studies were rated as having a high risk of bias, nine as moderate risk of bias and six as at low risk. Overall, 78.3% (n=18, 95% CI 58.1 to 90.3) of the nudges evaluated resulted in a reduction in overall antibiotic prescribing. Social norm feedback was the most frequently applied nudge (n=17), with 76.5% (n=13; 95% CI 52.7 to 90.4) of these studies reporting a reduction. Other nudges applied were changing option consequences (n=3; with 2 reporting a reduction), providing reminders (n=2; 2 reporting a reduction) and facilitating commitment (n=1; reporting a reduction). Successful social norm nudges typically either included an injunctive norm, compared prescribing to physicians with the lowest prescribers or targeted high prescribers. CONCLUSIONS Nudge interventions are effective for improving antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Expanding the use of nudge interventions beyond social norm nudges could reap further improvements in antibiotic prescribing practices. Policy-makers and managers need to be mindful of how social norm nudges are implemented to enhance intervention effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Z Raban
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gabriela Gonzalez
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy D Nguyen
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ben R Newell
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ling Li
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karla L Seaman
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Johanna I Westbrook
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sadeq AA, Hasan SS, AbouKhater N, Conway BR, Abdelsalam AE, Shamseddine JM, Babiker ZOE, Nsutebu EF, Bond SE, Aldeyab MA. Exploring Antimicrobial Stewardship Influential Interventions on Improving Antibiotic Utilization in Outpatient and Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11101306. [PMID: 36289964 PMCID: PMC9598859 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11101306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are targeted efforts by healthcare organizations to optimize antimicrobial use in clinical practice. The study aimed to explore effective interventions in improving antimicrobial use in hospitals. Literature was systemically searched for interventional studies through PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases that were published in the period between January 2010 to April 2022. A random-effects model was used to pool and evaluate data from eligible studies that reported antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in outpatient and inpatient settings. Pooled estimates presented as proportions and standardized mean differences. Forty-eight articles were included in this review: 32 in inpatient and 16 in outpatient settings. Seventeen interventions have been identified, and eight outcomes have been targeted. AMS interventions improved clinical, microbiological, and cost outcomes in most studies. When comparing non-intervention with intervention groups using meta-analysis, there was an insignificant reduction in length of stay (MD: -0.99; 95% CI: -2.38, 0.39) and a significant reduction in antibiotics' days of therapy (MD: -2.73; 95% CI: -3.92, -1.54). There were noticeable reductions in readmissions, mortality rates, and antibiotic prescriptions post antimicrobial stewardship multi-disciplinary team (AMS-MDT) interventions. Studies that involved a pharmacist as part of the AMS-MDT showed more significant improvement in measured outcomes than the studies that did not involve a pharmacist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed A. Sadeq
- Department of Pharmacy, Shaikh Shakhbout Medical City in Partnership with Mayo Clinic, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 11001, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
| | - Syed Shahzad Hasan
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
| | - Noha AbouKhater
- Department of Medicine, Shaikh Shakhbout Medical City in Partnership with Mayo Clinic, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 11001, United Arab Emirates
| | - Barbara R. Conway
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
- Institute of Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
| | - Abeer E. Abdelsalam
- Department of Pharmacy, Shaikh Shakhbout Medical City in Partnership with Mayo Clinic, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 11001, United Arab Emirates
| | - Jinan M. Shamseddine
- Department of Pharmacy, Shaikh Shakhbout Medical City in Partnership with Mayo Clinic, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 11001, United Arab Emirates
| | - Zahir Osman Eltahir Babiker
- Division of Infecious Diseases, Shaikh Shakhbout Medical City in Partnership with Mayo Clinic, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 11001, United Arab Emirates
| | - Emmanuel Fru Nsutebu
- Division of Infecious Diseases, Shaikh Shakhbout Medical City in Partnership with Mayo Clinic, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 11001, United Arab Emirates
| | - Stuart E. Bond
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
- Pharmacy Department, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield WF1 4DG, UK
| | - Mamoon A. Aldeyab
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-01484-472825
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Laupland KB. Preventing healthcare-related infections among older adults: a focus on cross-transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2022; 20:1171-1178. [PMID: 35793840 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2099375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older individuals (i.e. age ≥65 years) are at increased risk for development of infections including those due to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and transmission may occur between institutional and community settings. AREAS COVERED This article reviews infections in older individuals with a specific focus on healthcare-related and antimicrobial resistant infections. A structured narrative review was performed to identify articles published in English since 2010. Themes included defining the scope of the problem, establishing characteristics of older individuals that impact the burden of resistant infections, and interventions aimed at minimizing their impact. EXPERT OPINION Older individuals suffer a high burden of illness related to antimicrobial resistant infections. Individuals with chronic illnesses, frailty, and residents of nursing homes are at highest risk. Clinical trials have shown that antimicrobial stewardship interventions may reduce antibiotic use in nursing homes without compromising safety. Antimicrobial resistant bacteria are prevalent among nursing home residents, and bundled infection prevention and control interventions can reduce their transmission. Transmission of antimicrobial resistant bacteria occurs among older adults across hospital and institutional settings, which may further spread to the community. The burden of infections in older adults is expected to increase in the coming years and represents a healthcare and research priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin B Laupland
- Department of Intensive Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wubishet BL, Merlo G, Ghahreman-Falconer N, Hall L, Comans T. Economic evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship in primary care: a systematic review and quality assessment. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:2373-2388. [PMID: 35724206 PMCID: PMC9410674 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary care accounts for 80%–90% of antimicrobial prescriptions, making this setting an important focus for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. Objectives To collate the findings and critically appraise the qualities of economic evaluation studies of AMS or related interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in primary care. Methods A systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in primary care was performed. Published literature were retrieved through a search of Medline, Embase, EconLit and Web of Science databases for the period 2010 to 2020. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria checklist and Good Practice Guidelines for Decision-Analytic Modelling in Health Technology Assessment. Results Of the 2722 records identified, 12 studies were included in the review (8 trial-based and 4 modelled evaluations). The most common AMS interventions were communication skills training for health professionals and C-reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP-POCT). Types of economic evaluations included in the review were cost-effectiveness (7 studies), cost-utility (1), cost-benefit (2), cost-effectiveness and cost-utility (1) and cost analysis (1). While six of the studies found AMS interventions to be cost-effective, the other six reported them as not cost-effective or inconclusive. The quality of the studies ranged from good to low. Conclusions There were significant variations in cost-effectiveness of AMS interventions across studies and depending on the inclusion of cost components such as the cost of antimicrobial resistance. However, communication skills training and CRP-POCT were frequently cost-effective or cost-beneficial for reducing inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Befikadu L Wubishet
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| | - Gregory Merlo
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| | - Nazanin Ghahreman-Falconer
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.,Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4072, Australia.,School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| | - Lisa Hall
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| | - Tracy Comans
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Baier RR, Jump RLP, Zhang T, Kabbani S, Gifford DR, Gravenstein S. Feasibility of a Nursing Home Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2022; 23:1025-1030. [PMID: 34506771 PMCID: PMC10951856 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a bundled electronic intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in US nursing homes. DESIGN Prospective mixed-methods quality improvement intervention. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Nursing staff and residents in 13 nursing homes, and residents in 8 matched-control facilities (n = 21 facilities total, from 2 corporations). METHODS This study involved a 2-month design period (n = 5 facilities) focused on the acceptability and feasibility of a bundled electronic intervention consisting of 3 tools, followed by a 15-month implementation period (n = 8 facilities) during which we used rapid-cycle quality improvement methods to refine and add to the bundle. We used mixed-methods data from providers, intervention tools, and health records to assess feasibility and conduct a difference-in-difference analysis among the 8 intervention sites and 8 pair-matched controls. RESULTS Nurses at 5 pilot sites reported that initial versions of the electronic tools were acceptable and feasible, but barriers emerged when 8 different facilities began implementing the tools, prompting iterative revisions to the training and bundle. The final bundle consisted of 3 electronic tools and training that standardized digital documentation to document and track a change in resident condition, infections, antibiotic prescribing, and antibiotic follow-up. By the end of the implementation phase, all 8 facilities were using at least 1 of the 3 tools. Early antibiotic discontinuation increased 10.5% among intervention sites, but decreased 10.8% among control sites. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The 3 tools in our bundled electronic intervention capture clinical and prescribing data necessary to assess changes in antibiotic use and were feasible for nurses to adopt. Achieving this required modifying the tools and training before the intervention reached its final form. Comparisons of rates of antibiotic use at intervention and control facilities showed promising improvement in antibiotic discontinuation, demonstrating that the intervention could be evaluated using secondary electronic health record data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa R Baier
- Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Robin L P Jump
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) at the VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, OH, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine and Department of Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tingting Zhang
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Sarah Kabbani
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David R Gifford
- American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Stefan Gravenstein
- Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS-COIN), Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Falconer N, Paterson DL, Peel N, Welch A, Freeman C, Burkett E, Hubbard R, Comans T, Hanjani LS, Pascoe E, Hawley C, Gray L. A multimodal intervention to optimise antimicrobial use in residential aged care facilities (ENGAGEMENT): protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Trials 2022; 23:427. [PMID: 35597993 PMCID: PMC9123829 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06323-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate antibiotic use can cause harm and promote antimicrobial resistance, which has been declared a major health challenge by the World Health Organization. In Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs), the most common indications for antibiotic prescribing are for infections of the urinary tract, respiratory tract and skin and soft tissue. Studies indicate that a high proportion of these prescriptions are non-compliant with best prescribing guidelines. To date, a variety of interventions have been reported to address inappropriate prescribing and overuse of antibiotics but with mixed outcomes. This study aims to identify the impact of a set of sustainable, multimodal interventions in residential aged care targeting three common infection types. METHODS This protocol details a 20-month stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial conducted across 18 RACFs (as 18 clusters). A multimodal multi-disciplinary set of interventions, the 'AMS ENGAGEMENT bundle', will be tailored to meet the identified needs of participating RACFs. The key elements of the intervention bundle include education for nurses and general practitioners, telehealth support and formation of an antimicrobial stewardship team in each facility. Prior to the randomised sequential introduction of the intervention, each site will act as its own control in relation to usual care processes for antibiotic use and stewardship. The primary outcome for this study will be antibiotic consumption measured using defined daily doses (DDDs). Cluster-level rates will be calculated using total occupied bed numbers within each RACF during the observation period as the denominator. Results will be expressed as rates per 1000 occupied bed days. An economic analysis will be conducted to compare the costs associated with the intervention to that of usual care. A comprehensive process evaluation will be conducted using the REAIM Framework, to enable learnings from the trial to inform sustainable improvements in this field. DISCUSSION A structured AMS model of care, incorporating targeted interventions to optimise antimicrobial use in the RACF setting, is urgently needed and will be delivered by our trial. The trial will aim to empower clinicians, residents and families by providing a robust AMS programme to improve antibiotic-related health outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION US National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials.gov ( NCT04705259 ). Prospectively registered in 12th of January 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazanin Falconer
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.
- Department of Pharmacy, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.
| | - David L Paterson
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research (UQCCR), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Brisbane, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Butterfield Street, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia
| | - Nancye Peel
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Alyssa Welch
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Christopher Freeman
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Ellen Burkett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Ruth Hubbard
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital Southside Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Tracy Comans
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Leila Shafiee Hanjani
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Elaine Pascoe
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Carmel Hawley
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital Southside Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Leonard Gray
- UQ Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tandan M, Thapa P, Maharjan P, Bhandari B. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Antimicrobial Resistant and Prescribing in Nursing Home: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2022; 29:74-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
21
|
Karcıoglu O, Yilmaz S, Kilic M, Suzer NE, Ozbay S, Tatlıparmak AC, Ayan M. Geriatric Sepsis in the COVID-19 Era: Challenges in Diagnosis and Management. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND ALLIED SCIENCES 2022. [DOI: 10.51847/leeequplat] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
22
|
Raban MZ, Gates PJ, Gasparini C, Westbrook JI. Temporal and regional trends of antibiotic use in long-term aged care facilities across 39 countries, 1985-2019: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256501. [PMID: 34424939 PMCID: PMC8382177 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic misuse is a key contributor to antimicrobial resistance and a concern in long-term aged care facilities (LTCFs). Our objectives were to: i) summarise key indicators of systemic antibiotic use and appropriateness of use, and ii) examine temporal and regional variations in antibiotic use, in LTCFs (PROSPERO registration CRD42018107125). METHODS & FINDINGS Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 1990-2021 reporting antibiotic use rates in LTCFs. Random effects meta-analysis provided pooled estimates of antibiotic use rates (percentage of residents on an antibiotic on a single day [point prevalence] and over 12 months [period prevalence]; percentage of appropriate prescriptions). Meta-regression examined associations between antibiotic use, year of measurement and region. A total of 90 articles representing 78 studies from 39 countries with data between 1985-2019 were included. Pooled estimates of point prevalence and 12-month period prevalence were 5.2% (95% CI: 3.3-7.9; n = 523,171) and 62.0% (95% CI: 54.0-69.3; n = 946,127), respectively. Point prevalence varied significantly between regions (Q = 224.1, df = 7, p<0.001), and ranged from 2.4% (95% CI: 1.9-2.7) in Eastern Europe to 9.0% in the British Isles (95% CI: 7.6-10.5) and Northern Europe (95% CI: 7.7-10.5). Twelve-month period prevalence varied significantly between regions (Q = 15.1, df = 3, p = 0.002) and ranged from 53.9% (95% CI: 48.3-59.4) in the British Isles to 68.3% (95% CI: 63.6-72.7) in Australia. Meta-regression found no association between year of measurement and antibiotic use prevalence. The pooled estimate of the percentage of appropriate antibiotic prescriptions was 28.5% (95% CI: 10.3-58.0; n = 17,245) as assessed by the McGeer criteria. Year of measurement was associated with decreasing appropriateness of antibiotic use over time (OR:0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91). The most frequently used antibiotic classes were penicillins (n = 44 studies), cephalosporins (n = 36), sulphonamides/trimethoprim (n = 31), and quinolones (n = 28). CONCLUSIONS Coordinated efforts focusing on LTCFs are required to address antibiotic misuse in LTCFs. Our analysis provides overall baseline and regional estimates for future monitoring of antibiotic use in LTCFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Z. Raban
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter J. Gates
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claudia Gasparini
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Johanna I. Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Arnold SH, Nygaard Jensen J, Bjerrum L, Siersma V, Winther Bang C, Brostrøm Kousgaard M, Holm A. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to reduce antibiotics for urinary tract infections in nursing home residents: a cluster, randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2021; 21:1549-1556. [PMID: 34303417 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00001-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When suspecting a urinary tract infection (UTI), the nursing home staff contacts a physician with clinical information on behalf of the resident; hence, poor understanding of UTI or a lack of clinical communicative skills can cause overtreatment with antibiotics. We investigated whether a tailored intervention that improves knowledge about UTI and communication skills in nursing home staff influences antibiotic prescriptions for UTI. METHODS This open-label, parallel-group, cluster randomised controlled trial was done at 22 participating nursing homes in Denmark. Patients were eligible if they were nursing home residents aged 65 years or older, had the nursing home listed as their permanent address, and resided in a living space designated for those with dementia or somatic health-care needs. We included nursing homes that were not participating in other UTI projects and those in which staff were present at all hours. Using computer-generated random numbers and stratification by municipality, a statistician randomised the nursing homes (1:1) to receive either interactive educational sessions and use of a dialogue tool or to continue standard practice. The statistical analysis was blinded. Staff attended 75 min sessions over 8 weeks to learn how to distinguish between UTIs and asymptomatic bacteriuria, evaluate non-specific symptoms, and use the dialogue tool. The primary outcome was the number of antibiotic prescriptions for acute UTI per resident per days at risk, defined as the number of days the resident had been present at the nursing home during the trial period. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03715062. FINDINGS Between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2018, 22 of 68 invited nursing homes were recruited. Of 22 randomised nursing homes (n=1625 residents), 11 received the intervention (770 [92·2%] of 835 allocated residents) and 11 were in the control group (705 [89·2%] of 790 allocated residents). The standardised number of nursing home staff was 572 in the intervention group and 535 in the control group. All nursing homes completed the trial. 65 residents were excluded from data collection in the intervention group and 85 were excluded in the control group. 1470 residents (intervention n=765; control n=705) were analysed for the primary endpoint. The number of antibiotic prescriptions for UTI per resident was 134 per 84 035 days at risk in the intervention group and 228 per 77817 days at risk in the control group. The rate ratio (RR) of receiving an antibiotic for UTI was 0·51 (95% CI 0·37-0·71) in the unadjusted model and 0·42 (0·31-0·57) in the adjusted model. Of 140 diary entries of suspected UTIs, no deaths were reported. 421 (28·5%) of 1475 residents were admitted to hospital. The risk of all-cause hospitalisation increased in the intervention group (adjusted model RR 1·28, 95% CI 0·95-1·74), whereas all-cause mortality was lower in the intervention group (0·91, 0·62-1·33). INTERPRETATION The intervention effectively reduced antibiotic prescriptions and inappropriate treatments for UTI without substantially influencing all-cause hospitalisations and mortality. FUNDING Danish Ministry of Health and the Velux Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sif Helene Arnold
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Jette Nygaard Jensen
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Lars Bjerrum
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Volkert Siersma
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Anne Holm
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Are antimicrobial stewardship interventions effective and safe in long-term care facilities? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27:1431-1438. [PMID: 34118423 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are health-care settings with high antimicrobial consumption and hence need to develop effective antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs). OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of ASPs on care-related, clinical and ecological outcomes in LTCFs. METHODS Data sources were PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and SCOPUS. Study eligibility criteria were original research articles (controlled clinical trials or controlled before and after studies) published up to 1 October 2020. Participants were adult residents of LTCFs, residential aged-care facilities, nursing homes, veterans' homes, skilled nursing facilities and assisted living facilities for older people. Interventions included ASPs versus standard care. Outcomes assessed were antimicrobial consumption and appropriateness, infections, hospital admissions and mortality. Available data were pooled in a meta-analysis, and inconsistency between studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS Of the 3111 papers identified, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. All of them analysed the impact of interventions on antimicrobial use based on consumption-related variables (n = 8) and/or percentage of inappropriate prescriptions (n = 6). Pooled data showed a mean difference of -0.47 prescriptions per 1000 resident-days in favour of ASPs (95% CI -0.87 to -0.07, I2 = 71%). Five studies analysed the clinical effect of ASPs on the number of hospital admissions and/or resident mortality. The meta-analysis showed a mean difference of 0.17 hospital admissions per 1000 resident-days (95% CI -0.07 to 0.41, I2 = 17%) and a mean difference of -0.02 deaths per 1000 resident-days (95% CI -0.14 to 0.09, I2 = 0%). Only two studies included infections as a study outcome. CONCLUSIONS ASPs appear to improve antimicrobial use in this setting without increasing hospital admissions or deaths, indicating that these programmes do not lead to under-treatment of infections. Nonetheless, further higher-quality clinical trials are required to understand the effects of ASPs in LTCFs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021225127.
Collapse
|
25
|
Aliyu S, Travers JL, Heimlich SL, Ifill J, Smaldone A. Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Optimize Treatment of Infections in Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Appl Gerontol 2021; 41:892-901. [PMID: 34075829 DOI: 10.1177/07334648211018299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Effects of antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) interventions to optimize antibiotic use for infections in nursing home (NH) residents remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess ASPs in NHs and their effects on antibiotic use, multi-drug-resistant organisms, antibiotic prescribing practices, and resident mortality. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using five databases (1988-2020). Nineteen articles were included, 10 met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Inappropriate antibiotic use decreased following ASP intervention in eight studies with a pooled decrease of 13.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [4.7, 23.0]; Cochran's Q = 166,837.8, p < .001, I2 = 99.9%) across studies. Decrease in inappropriate antibiotic use was highest in studies that examined antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI). Education and antibiotic stewardship algorithms for UTI were the most effective interventions. Evidence surrounding ASPs in NH is weak, with recommendations suited for UTIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jasmine L Travers
- New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York City, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Szymczak J, Trautner B. Support to scale antibiotic stewardship in long-term care homes: how much is enough? BMJ Qual Saf 2021; 31:79-82. [PMID: 34059558 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Szymczak
- Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Barbara Trautner
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Section of Health Services Research, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jokanovic N, Haines T, Cheng AC, Holt KE, Hilmer SN, Jeon YH, Stewardson AJ, Stuart RL, Spelman T, Peel TN, Peleg AY. Multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of an antimicrobial stewardship programme in residential aged care: protocol for the START trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046142. [PMID: 33653766 PMCID: PMC7929827 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global health threat, driven by increasing inappropriate use of antimicrobials. High prevalence of unnecessary use of antimicrobials in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) has driven demand for the development and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. The Stepped-wedge Trial to increase antibiotic Appropriateness in Residential aged care facilities and model Transmission of antimicrobial resistance (START) will implement and evaluate the impact of a nurse-led AMS programme on antimicrobial use in 12 RACFs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The START trial will implement and evaluate a nurse-led AMS programme via a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial design in 12 RACFs over 16 months. The AMS programme will incorporate education, aged care-specific treatment guidelines, documentation forms, and audit and feedback strategies that will target aged care staff, general practitioners, pharmacists, and residents and their families. The intervention will primarily focus on urinary tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, and skin and soft tissue infections. RACFs will transition from control to intervention phases in random order, two at a time, every 2 months, with a 2-month transition, wash-in period. The primary outcome is the cumulative proportion of residents within each facility prescribed an antibiotic during each month and total days of antibiotic use per 1000 occupied bed days. Secondary outcomes include the number of courses of systemic antimicrobial therapy, antimicrobial appropriateness, antimicrobial resistant organisms, Clostridioides difficile infection, change in antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, hospitalisations and all-cause mortality. Analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been granted by the Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/Alfred/591). Research findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and summarised reports provided to participating RACFs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03941509.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natali Jokanovic
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terry Haines
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allen C Cheng
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kathryn E Holt
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yun-Hee Jeon
- Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J Stewardson
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rhonda L Stuart
- Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim Spelman
- Centre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Trisha N Peel
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anton Y Peleg
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Infection and Immunity Theme, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sibani M, Mazzaferri F, Carrara E, Pezzani MD, Arieti F, Göpel S, Paul M, Tacconelli E, Mutters NT, Voss A. White Paper: Bridging the gap between surveillance data and antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care facilities-practical guidance from the JPIAMR ARCH and COMBACTE-MAGNET EPI-Net networks. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:ii33-ii41. [PMID: 33280047 PMCID: PMC7719406 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In long-term care facilities (LTCFs) residents often receive inappropriate antibiotic treatment and infection prevention and control practices are frequently inadequate, thus favouring acquisition of MDR organisms. There is increasing evidence in the literature describing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities in LTCFs, but practical guidance on how surveillance data should be linked with AMS activities in this setting is lacking. To bridge this gap, the JPIAMR ARCH and COMBACTE-MAGNET EPI-Net networks joined their efforts to provide practical guidance for linking surveillance data with AMS activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS Considering the three main topics [AMS leadership and accountability, antimicrobial usage (AMU) and AMS, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and AMS], a literature review was performed and a list of target actions was developed. Consensus on target actions was reached through a RAND-modified Delphi process involving 40 experts from 18 countries and different professional backgrounds adopting a One Health approach. RESULTS From the 25 documents identified, 25 target actions were retrieved and proposed for expert evaluation. The consensus process produced a practical checklist including 23 target actions, differentiating between essential and desirable targets according to clinical relevance and feasibility. Flexible proposals for AMS team composition and leadership were provided, with a strong emphasis on the need for well-defined and adequately supported roles and responsibilities. Specific antimicrobial classes, AMU metrics, pathogens and resistance patterns to be monitored are addressed. Effective reporting strategies are described. CONCLUSIONS The proposed checklist represents a practical tool to support local AMS teams across a wide range of care delivery organization and availability of resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcella Sibani
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fulvia Mazzaferri
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Elena Carrara
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Diletta Pezzani
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabiana Arieti
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Siri Göpel
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Clinical Research Unit for Healthcare Associated Infections, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mical Paul
- Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Clinical Research Unit for Healthcare Associated Infections, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nico T Mutters
- Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andreas Voss
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Decision Tools and Studies to Improve the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Nursing Home Residents: A Narrative Review. Drugs Aging 2020; 38:29-41. [PMID: 33174126 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-020-00814-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The overdiagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing home residents that results in unnecessary antibiotic treatment has been recognized for more than 2 decades. This has resulted in the publication of several decision tools for the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents. Given all of the decision tools available, how does one decide on the approach to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents in the context of an antimicrobial stewardship program? To address this question, this paper reviews: (a) published decision tools for the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents; (b) randomized controlled trials to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents; and (c) non-randomized studies to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents. Review of published decision tools indicates that the diagnosis of UTI is based on the presence of urinary tract signs and symptoms. However, there is considerable variation in the diagnostic criteria among the decision tools and there is no consensus as to the best clinical criteria for the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents. Review of four randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents found that different interventions and outcome measures of varying complexity were utilized. Although randomized controlled trials were, to some extent, successful, it was not clear in any trial if one or more components of an intervention contributed the most to the success and there was no evidence that an intervention was feasible or sustainable after a trial was completed. Review of non-randomized trials to improve the diagnosis of UTI in nursing home residents all had methodologic limitations that make interpretation problematic. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies all focused on the process before an antibiotic is prescribed. An alternative approach that focuses on assessment of the post-prescription process (antibiotic time-out protocol) is reviewed; initial studies of this protocol were inconclusive because of design limitations and additional studies are required. Regardless of what interventions are utilized, there must be provider and nursing staff commitment and motivation to improve the management of residents with suspected UTI and methods to achieve improvement must be demonstrated to be feasible and sustainable given the resources available in nursing homes.
Collapse
|
30
|
Crayton E, Richardson M, Fuller C, Smith C, Liu S, Forbes G, Anderson N, Shallcross L, Michie S, Hayward A, Lorencatto F. Interventions to improve appropriate antibiotic prescribing in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:237. [PMID: 32646382 PMCID: PMC7350746 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01564-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Overuse of antibiotics has contributed to antimicrobial resistance; a growing public health threat. In long-term care facilities, levels of inappropriate prescribing are as high as 75%. Numerous interventions targeting long-term care facilities’ antimicrobial stewardship have been reported with varying, and largely unexplained, effects. Therefore, this review aimed to apply behavioural science frameworks to specify the component behaviour change techniques of stewardship interventions in long-term care facilities and identify those components associated with improved outcomes. Method A systematic review (CRD42018103803) was conducted through electronic database searches. Two behavioural science frameworks, the Behaviour Change Wheel and Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy were used to classify intervention descriptions into intervention types and component behaviour change techniques used. Study design and outcome heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis and meta-regression. Interventions were categorised as ‘very promising’ (all outcomes statistically significant), ‘quite promising’ (some outcomes statistically significant), or ‘not promising’ (no outcomes statistically significant). ‘Promise ratios’ (PR) were calculated for identified intervention types and behaviour change techniques by dividing the number of (very or quite) promising interventions featuring the intervention type or behaviour change technique by the number of interventions featuring the intervention type or behaviour change technique that were not promising. Promising intervention types and behaviour change techniques were defined as those with a PR ≥ 2. Results Twenty studies (of19 interventions) were included. Seven interventions (37%) were ‘very promising’, eight ‘quite promising’ (42%) and four ‘not promising’ (21%). Most promising intervention types were ‘persuasion’ (n = 12; promise ratio (PR) = 5.0), ‘enablement’ (n = 16; PR = 4.33) and ‘education’ (n = 19; PR = 3.75). Most promising behaviour change techniques were ‘feedback on behaviour’ (n = 9; PR = 8.0) and ‘restructuring the social environment’ (e.g. staff role changes; n = 8; PR = 7.0). Conclusion Systematic identification of the active ingredients of antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care facilities was facilitated through the application of behavioural science frameworks. Incorporating environmental restructuring and performance feedback may be promising intervention strategies for antimicrobial stewardship interventions within long-term care facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Crayton
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
| | - Michelle Richardson
- Institute of Education (IOE), University College London, London, WC1H 0NS, UK
| | - Chris Fuller
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Catherine Smith
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Sunny Liu
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Gillian Forbes
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Niall Anderson
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.,Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), London, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Laura Shallcross
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.,Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), London, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Andrew Hayward
- Institute of Epidemiology & Health, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Fabiana Lorencatto
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.,Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), London, BS8 2BN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Arnold SH, Olesen JA, Jensen JN, Bjerrum L, Holm A, Kousgaard MB. Development of a Tailored, Complex Intervention for Clinical Reflection and Communication about Suspected Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Home Residents. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9:antibiotics9060360. [PMID: 32630549 PMCID: PMC7345997 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9060360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Inappropriate antibiotic treatments for urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing homes cause the development of resistant bacteria. Nonspecific symptoms and asymptomatic bacteriuria are drivers of overtreatment. Nursing home staff provide general practice with information about ailing residents; therefore, their knowledge and communication skills influence prescribing. This paper describes the development of a tailored, complex intervention for a cluster-randomised trial that targets the knowledge of UTI and communication skills in nursing home staff to reduce antibiotic prescriptions. Methods: A dialogue tool was drafted, drawing on participatory observations in nursing homes, interviews with stakeholders, and a survey in general practice. The tool was tailored through a five-phase process that included stakeholders. Finally, the tool and a case-based educational session were tested in a pilot study. Results: The main barriers were that complex patients were evaluated by healthcare staff with limited knowledge about disease and clinical reasoning; findings reported to general practice were insignificant and included vague descriptions; there was evidence of previous opinion bias; nonspecific symptoms were interpreted as UTI; intuitive reasoning led to the inappropriate suspicion of UTI. Conclusion: Sustainable change in antibiotic-prescribing behaviour in nursing homes requires a change in nursing home staff’s beliefs about and management of UTIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sif H. Arnold
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 24 Q, K 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark; (J.A.O.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (M.B.K.)
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev, Denmark;
- Correspondence:
| | - Julie A. Olesen
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 24 Q, K 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark; (J.A.O.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (M.B.K.)
| | - Jette N. Jensen
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev, Denmark;
| | - Lars Bjerrum
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 24 Q, K 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark; (J.A.O.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (M.B.K.)
| | - Anne Holm
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 24 Q, K 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark; (J.A.O.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (M.B.K.)
| | - Marius B. Kousgaard
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 24 Q, K 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark; (J.A.O.); (L.B.); (A.H.); (M.B.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Arnold SH, Jensen JN, Kousgaard MB, Siersma V, Bjerrum L, Holm A. Reducing Antibiotic Prescriptions for Urinary Tract Infection in Nursing Homes Using a Complex Tailored Intervention Targeting Nursing Home Staff: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e17710. [PMID: 32383679 PMCID: PMC7244999 DOI: 10.2196/17710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common reason for antibiotic prescription in nursing homes. Overprescription causes antibiotic-related harms in those who are treated and others residing within the nursing home. The diagnostic process in nursing homes is complicated with both challenging issues related to the elderly population and the nursing home setting. A physician rarely visits a nursing home for suspected UTI. Consequently, the knowledge of UTI and communication skills of staff influence the diagnosis. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to describe a cluster randomized controlled trial with a tailored complex intervention for improving the knowledge of UTI and communication skills of nursing home staff in order to decrease the number of antibiotic prescriptions for UTI in nursing home residents, without changing hospitalization and mortality. METHODS The study describes an open-label cluster randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups and a 1:1 allocation ratio. Twenty-two eligible nursing homes are sampled from the Capital Region of Denmark, corresponding to 1274 nursing home residents. The intervention group receives a dialogue tool, and all nursing home staff attend a workshop on UTI. The main outcomes of the study are the antibiotic prescription rate for UTI, all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and suspected UTI during the trial period. RESULTS The trial ended in April 2019. Data have been collected and are being analyzed. We expect the results of the trial to be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the fall of 2020. CONCLUSIONS The greatest strengths of this study are the randomized design, tailored development of the intervention, and access to medical records. The potential limitations are the hierarchy in the prescription process, Hawthorne effect, and biased access to data on signs and symptoms through a UTI diary. The results of this trial could offer a strategy to overcome some of the challenges of increased antibiotic resistance and could have implications in terms of how to handle cases of suspected UTI. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03715062; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03715062. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/17710.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sif Helene Arnold
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jette Nygaard Jensen
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Volkert Siersma
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Bjerrum
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Holm
- The Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|