Anticoagulation adherence and its associated factors in patients with atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional study

Warfarin Adherence and Its Associated Factors in Thai Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction

Older people mostly found unable to adhere with warfarin treatment guidelines. The health service system is challenged in order to improve medication adherence in older population under limited health resources. The purpose of this study was to explore health systems factors on warfarin adherence in older population, particularly in resources constraint setting.

Methods

This study was a cross-sectional predictive study that enrolled older people who experienced atrial fibrillation (AF) and treated by warfarin, aged 60 years and over, and followed up at the warfarin clinic.

Results

A total of 197 participants with the mean age of 72.03 years (SD = 8.84) was recruited. Almost of them (85.8%) reported adhered to warfarin prescription. More than a half (60.5%) were able to report their targeted INR. Participants who stayed with the family had 5.54 times (95% CI 1.79-19.33), took regular daily dose warfarin had 5.07 times (95% CI 1.05-24.49), perceived targeted INR had 2.94 times (95% CI 1.04-8.29), and received family support had 1.33 times (95% CI 1.11-1.60) increased odds of warfarin adherence than those who did not. Participants who perceived a barrier to taking medication had 0.93 times decreased odds of warfarin adherence than those who did not (95% CI 0.86-0.99).

Conclusion

Healthcare system should encourage family to support the older population with AF in order to increase warfarin adherence. Future research should develop intervention combining family support to promote warfarin adherence.

Developing and Validating a Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) is the cornerstone treatment for preventing venous thromboembolism and stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Despite its significance, challenges in adherence and persistence to OAC regimens have been reported, leading to severe health complications. Central to addressing these challenges is the concept of self-efficacy (SE) in medication management. Currently, there is a noticeable gap in available tools specifically designed to measure SE in OAC self-care management, while such tools are crucial for enhancing patient adherence and overall treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop and validate a novel scale aimed to measure self-care self-efficacy (SCSE) in patients with NVAF under OAC, which is the patients' Self-Care Self-Efficacy Index in Oral Anticoagulation Therapy Management (SCSE-OAC), for English- and Italian-speaking populations. We also seek to assess patients' SE in managing their OAC treatment effectively and to explore the relationship between SE levels and sociodemographic and clinical variables.

METHODS

Using a multiphase, mixed methods observational study design, we first conceptualize the SCSE-OAC through literature reviews, patient focus groups, and expert consensus. The scale's content validity will be evaluated through patient and expert reviews, while its construct validity is assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, ensuring cross-cultural applicability. Criterion validity will be examined through correlations with clinical outcomes. Reliability will be tested via internal consistency and test-retest reliability measures. The study will involve adult outpatients with NVAF on OAC treatment for a minimum of 3 months, using both e-surveys and paper forms for data collection.

RESULTS

It is anticipated that the SCSE-OAC will emerge as a reliable and valid tool for measuring SE in OAC self-care management. It will enable identifying patients at risk of poor adherence due to low SE, facilitating targeted educational interventions. The scale's validation in both English and Italian-speaking populations will underscore its applicability in diverse clinical settings, contributing significantly to personalized patient-centered care in anticoagulation management.

CONCLUSIONS

The development and validation of the SCSE-OAC represent a significant advancement in the field of anticoagulation therapy. Validating the index in English- and Italian-speaking populations will enable personalized patient-centered educational interventions, ultimately improving OAC treatment outcomes. The SCSE-OAC's focus on SCSE introduces a novel approach to identifying and addressing individual patient needs, promoting adherence, and ultimately improving health outcomes. Future endeavors will seek to extend the validation of the SCSE-OAC across diverse cultural and linguistic landscapes, broadening its applicability in global clinical and research settings. This scale-up effort is crucial for establishing a universal standard for measuring SCSE in OAC management, empowering clinicians and researchers worldwide to tailor effective and culturally sensitive interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05820854; https://tinyurl.com/2mmypey7.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/51489.

Role of a National Health Service Electronic Prescriptions Database in the Detection of Prescribing and Dispensing Issues and Adherence Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation therapy plays a crucial role in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) by significantly reducing the risk of stroke. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) became preferred over warfarin due to their superior safety and efficacy profile. Assessing adherence to anticoagulation therapy is necessary in clinical practice for optimising patient outcomes and treatment efficacy, thus emphasising its significance.

METHODS

A retrospective study utilised the Latvian National Health Service reimbursement prescriptions database, covering prescriptions for AF and flutter from January 2012 to December 2022. The proportion of days covered method was selected for adherence assessment, categorising it into three groups: (1) below 80%, (2) between 80% and 90%, and (3) above 90%.

RESULTS

A total of 1,646,648 prescriptions were analysed. Dabigatran prescriptions started declining after 2020, coinciding with a decrease in warfarin prescriptions since 2018. The total adherence levels to DOAC therapy were 69.4%. Only 44.2% of users achieved an adherence level exceeding 80%. The rate of paper prescriptions decreased from 98.5% in 2017 to 1.3% in 2022. Additionally, the utilisation of international non-proprietary names reached 79.7% in 2022. Specifically, 16.7% of patients selected a single pharmacy, whereas 27.7% visited one or two pharmacies. Meanwhile, other patients obtained medicines from multiple pharmacies.

CONCLUSIONS

The total adherence level to DOAC therapy is evaluated as low and there was no significant difference in age, gender, or "switcher" status among adherence groups. Physicians' prescribing habits have changed over a decade.

Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios

It is well established that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of anticoagulant strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) since they are superior or non-inferior to VKAs in reducing thromboembolic risk and are associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (IH). In addition, many factors, such as fewer pharmacokinetic interactions and less need for monitoring, contribute to the favor of this therapeutic strategy. Although DOACs represent a more suitable option, several issues should be considered in clinical practice, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs), switching to other antithrombotic therapies, preprocedural and postprocedural periods, and the use in patients with chronic renal and liver failure and in those with cancer. Furthermore, adherence to DOACs appears to remain suboptimal. This narrative review aims to provide a practical guide for DOAC prescription and address challenging scenarios.

Self-reported adherence to direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin therapy in a specialized thrombosis service-a cross-sectional study of patients in a Canadian Health Region

PURPOSE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a better safety and efficacy profile than warfarin and are currently recommended for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Given that DOACs do not require regular laboratory monitoring compared to warfarin, patients' interactions with the health care system is reduced. Adequate adherence to DOACs is important and reported adherence to anticoagulation is unclear in clinical practice. This study aims to assess self-reported adherence to oral anticoagulants in a specialized Adult Outpatient Thrombosis Service (TS).  METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who were prescribed an oral anticoagulant and had attended at least one appointment with an Adult Outpatient Thrombosis Service (TS) between October 10, 2017, and May 31, 2019. Adherence to oral anticoagulant therapy was assessed using the 12-item validated Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) score. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate association between patient characteristics and medication adherence. Adherence rates in DOACs and warfarin were compared.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninety-nine patients completed and returned the survey. Of the 399 who completed the survey, 74% were prescribed DOACs and 26% received warfarin. Most of the patients (89.3%) were ≥ 50 years of age and half (57.3%) were male. About two-thirds (67%) had at least post-secondary education. The duration of anticoagulation use differed between patients on DOAC and warfarin; a greater proportion of those who had used anticoagulants for less than 1 year was on DOACs compared to warfarin (20.9% vs 4.9%, p = 0.001). For patients who had been on anticoagulation for > 5 years, the proportion of warfarin patients was greater than DOAC (57.8% vs 20.5%, p = 0.001). Self-reported adherence to oral anticoagulant therapy using the 12-item ARMS scale for warfarin and DOACs were 87.3% and 90.9%, respectively. Among the warfarin users, patient satisfaction with TS was associated with medication adherence (OR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.05-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported medication adherence was similar between warfarin and DOACs. Since suboptimal adherence is associated with poor clinical outcomes and increased costs, various stakeholders should emphasize the importance of medication adherence to oral anticoagulants at each patient encounter.

Efficacy of a Health Belief Model-Based Intervention for Anticoagulant Adherence in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Evidence supports anticoagulants' efficacy in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, poor anticoagulant adherence increases the risks of stroke and bleeding.Aim: The study aims to test the efficacy of a health belief model-based intervention for improving the primary outcome, adherence to anticoagulant therapy, and the secondary outcomes, knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy of anticoagulant therapy.Methods: The study is a parallel randomized trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. A convenience sample of 72 patients treated with anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation was recruited from cardiology clinics in Taiwan. They were randomly assigned to either the control or intervention groups. The health belief model-based intervention comprises a 60-minute individual face-to-face instruction and six follow-up telephone calls. A blinded outcome assessor collected self-report data from both groups at baseline (T1), 12th week (T2), and 24th week (T3).Results: A generalized estimating equation showed significant group-by-time interaction effects on both adherence to and knowledge of anticoagulant therapy. The intervention group showed significantly greater improvements in adherence (ß = -1.25, 95% CI: -2.46 to -0.04) and knowledge (ß = 17.93, 95% CI: 4.63–31.23) across the three time points than the control group did. However, there was no significant between-group difference in self-efficacy, perceived benefit, or perceived barriers to adherence.Conclusion: The study results support the intervention's efficacy on improving adherence to and knowledge of anticoagulant therapy among patients with atrial fibrillation, but no effect on other essential concepts health belief model.

Adherence to Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients Attending a Multidisciplinary Thrombosis Service in Canada - A Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

Poor medication adherence puts patients who require antithrombotic therapy at greater risk of complications. We started a multidisciplinary Adult Outpatient Thrombosis Service in 2017 in a Canadian health authority and were interested in the level of medication adherence in the population attending.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to assess adherence to antithrombotic medications for patients attending a multidisciplinary Thrombosis Service.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of outpatients seen at the Thrombosis Service between 2017 and 2019 using the 12-item validated Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) to assess adherence to antithrombotic (anticoagulants and antiplatelet) therapy. Linear regression analysis examined the factors associated with adherence to antithrombotic therapy.

RESULTS

Of 1058 eligible patients, 53.2% responded to the survey. Seventeen were excluded from the analysis for missing more than 6 responses to the 12 items on the ARMS. About 55% (n = 297) were on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), 19% (n = 102) on warfarin, 5.0% (n = 27) on low molecular weight heparin, 3.3% (n = 18) on antiplatelet therapy and 18% (n = 96) were no longer on antithrombotic therapy. Nearly half (47%, n = 253) had taken antithrombotic therapy for 1-5 years while 28% (n = 150) and 25% (n = 137) had taken antithrombotic treatments for <1 and >5 years, respectively. Most patients (87%, n = 475) were ≥50 years and half (51%, n = 277) were male. The mean adherence score was 13.9 (SD±2.2) and 88% (n = 481) of participants were adherent to antithrombotic treatment (ARMS = 12-16). Multivariable linear regression showed that patients with post-graduate education had 0.4% lower adherence to antithrombotic therapy as compared with elementary education (β = 0.0039, p = 0.048). Patients with prior antithrombotic agent use >5 years had 0.5% lower adherence to antithrombotic treatment compared to patients with <1 year (β = 0.0047, p = 0.0244).

CONCLUSION

Self-reported adherence to antithrombotic therapy was high (88%) within a multidisciplinary Thrombosis Service. Patients with advanced education and prolong duration of antithrombotic therapy were more likely to have lower self-reported adherence to antithrombotic treatment.

Assessment of adherence, treatment satisfaction and knowledge of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients

AIM

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about the association between medication adherence, patient satisfaction and treatment knowledge. The objective was to determine patients' DOAC adherence and their treatment satisfaction over time. Furthermore, we respectively investigated possible associations of treatment satisfaction and treatment knowledge in relation to adherence.

METHODS

Longitudinal study conducted in AF patients hospitalized in 2019 in a tertiary university hospital. DOAC adherence, treatment satisfaction and knowledge were assessed with validated questionnaires. Mixed effects logistic regression was modelled to investigate the effect of both treatment satisfaction and knowledge on DOAC adherence over time.

RESULTS

In total, 164 patients participated of which 128 and 101 patients could be recontacted after a period of respectively 3 (first contact) and 6 months (second contact) to assess adherence and treatment satisfaction. Suboptimal adherence was observed in 40.6% of the patients after 3 months and in 42.6% after 6 months (p=0.78). There was no significant difference (p=0.29) in the total score for treatment satisfaction between the first (79.2%) and the second contact (80.6%). DOAC adherence was not affected by time (p=0.71) nor by total knowledge score (p=0.61) or treatment satisfaction score (p=0.34). Nonetheless, a strong correlation between treatment satisfaction and knowledge was found (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

DOAC adherence was suboptimal. Treatment satisfaction and knowledge were not associated with DOAC adherence over a 6 month period. Knowledge gaps were identified that could be remediated through patient education and follow-up.

Factors Associated with Anticoagulation Adherence in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE

Inadequate medication adherence among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) will directly affect the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation therapy, leading to a considerable increase in the risk of ischemic stroke and death. In this study, we aim to investigate medication adherence and identify the influencing factors, including social-demographic, disease-related information and self-efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited 170 patients with NVAF from a tertiary hospital atrial fibrillation outpatient clinics and cardiology ward from June 2020 to September 2020. Patients who had been taking oral anticoagulation medication for at least 3 months were included. And Morisky medication adherence scale (MGL) was used to assess the adherence to anticoagulants, which scores <4 were considered as low adherence.

RESULTS

Fifty (29.4%) NVAF patients had a MGL score<4. Monthly income, types of comorbidities, number of drugs, and self-efficacy were determinants of anticoagulation adherence. Binomial logistic regression showed that patients had been prescribed more durgs (OR: 3.51, p=0.002), had high monthly income (OR: 7.87, p=0.001), without other diseases (OR: 8.00, p=0.005), and with higher self-efficacy (OR: 1.42, p=0.001) showed high adherence.

CONCLUSION

Number of drugs, types of comorbidities, monthly income, and self-efficacy were associated with the adherence of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs).