Self-identified barriers to rural mental health services in Iowa by older adults with multiple comorbidities: qualitative interview study

Reviews for multimorbidity risk in people with inflammatory conditions: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

People with inflammatory rheumatological conditions (IRCs) are at high risk of developing other conditions including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mood disorders.

AIM

To explore perspectives of people with IRCs and healthcare practitioners (HCPs) on the content and delivery of a review consultation aimed at identification and management of multiple long-term conditions (mLTCs).

DESIGN & SETTING

Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with people with IRCs and HCPs in primary and secondary care.

METHOD

People with IRCs participated in individual semi-structured interviews by telephone or online platform. HCPs (including primary and secondary care clinicians) participated in online focus groups. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen people with IRCs were interviewed; three focus groups with HCPs were conducted. The following two main themes were identified: reflecting on the value of review consultations; and what would a new review look like? Overall, people with IRCs and HCPs reflected that access to reviews is inequitable, leading to duplication of reviews and fragmentation in care. People with IRCs, at times, had difficulty conceptualising reviews, especially when discussing their future risk of conditions. People suggested that preparation before the healthcare review could align patient and HCP agendas as part of a flexible and person-centred discussion.

CONCLUSION

Any review introduced for people with IRCs must move beyond a 'tick-box' exercise. To gain maximum value from a review, preparation from both patient and HCP may be required alongside a person-centred approach while ensuring they are targeted at people most likely to benefit.

Knowledge, familiarity, and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on barriers to seeking mental health services among older people: a cross-sectional study

AIM

The COVID-19 pandemic caused drastic changes in older people's daily activities with a negative impact on their mental health, yet older people are less likely to seek mental health services. This study aims to explore the relationship between knowledge of and familiarity with mental health services, along with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and barriers to seeking mental health services among older people.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with a convenience sample of 352 older people, recruited among community-dwelling adults who attended randomly selected postal offices and pension outlets. Three tools were used: a structured interview schedule for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of older people, the revised version of the Knowledge and Familiarity of Mental Health Services Scale (KFFMHS-R), and the Barriers to Mental Health Services Scale Revised (BMHSS-R).

RESULTS

All participants reported experiencing mental health distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intrinsic barriers had a higher mean score than extrinsic barriers, and 27.4% of the variance of overall barriers to seeking mental health could be explained through regression analysis by familiarity, knowledge of mental health services, and age. Overall barriers explained 24.4% of the variance of older people's perceived distress as an impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (F = 22.160, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of mental health services was the most significant predictor of barriers to seeking mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher barriers predicted higher distress as an impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of the study suggest the need for a multidisciplinary mental health team for older people.

Real-world treatment modalities, health care resource utilization, and costs among commercially insured patients with newly diagnosed major depressive disorder in the United States

BACKGROUND: In the United States, major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent mental health disorders. Treatment guidelines for MDD recommend pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies tailored to the patient's disease severity, level of function, and comorbid health conditions. While previous studies examined real-world pharmacologic treatment patterns and costs among patients with MDD, few have examined the use of nonpharmacologic treatments and their association with health care resource utilization (HCRU) and cost. OBJECTIVE: To describe prevalence and associations between patient/provider characteristics and treatment modality and characterize HCRU and cost by treatment modality for patients with newly diagnosed MDD. METHODS: Commercially insured US patients, aged 18-62 years with newly diagnosed MDD between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2019, were retrospectively identified from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database. Eligible patients were continuously enrolled in the health plan for 1 year before and 2 years after the first MDD diagnosis (index date). Those with co-occurring schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, postpartum depression, substance use disorder, and any prior MDD treatments were excluded. Treatment modalities assessed in the 2-year post-index period included antidepressant only (Rx-only), nonpharmacologic only (non-Rx-only), both antidepressant and nonpharmacologic (combination), and no treatment. HCRU and costs were assessed in the 2-year post-index period by treatment modality. Regression models identified associations between patient/provider characteristics and treatment modality, and the relationship between treatment modality and MDD severity changes. RESULTS: In total, 12,657 patients were included (mean age: 36 years; 60% female). During follow-up, 34% of patients received Rx-only, 25% received non-Rx-only, 28% received combination, and 13% received no treatment. MDD severity at diagnosis (26% mild, 54% moderate, 20% severe) was available for 51% of patients. Post-index inpatient hospitalizations were 11% for those with Rx-only, 10% for non-Rx-only, 16% for combination, and 29% for no treatment, whereas all-cause mean monthly total costs were $792, $633, $786, and $1,292, respectively. In multinomial logistic regression, age, sex, geographic region and urbanicity of patient residence, socioeconomic status, diagnosing provider specialty, and initial diagnosis location were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with treatment modality. In multivariable logistic regression, recipients of Rx-only (odds ratio = 2.03, P < 0.01) or combination (odds ratio = 3.26, P < 0.01) had higher odds of improving MDD severity than patients who received no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world sample of commercially insured patients, we observed variations in outcomes by treatment modality and an association between treatment modality and disease severity. Further research is needed to explore the underlying causal relationships between treatment modality and patient outcomes. Study Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YQ6B3 DISCLOSURES: Dr Grabner is an employee of Carelon Research, which received funding from the Innovation and Value Initiative for the conduct of the study on which this manuscript is based. Ms Pizzicato and Mr Yang were employees of Carelon Research at the time the study was conducted. Dr Grabner is a shareholder of Elevance Health. Drs Xie and Chapman are employees of the Innovation and Value Initiative.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people who inject drugs accessing harm reduction services in an rural American state

Background

The impact of public health policies during the COVID-19 pandemic on people who inject drugs (PWID) has varied across regions. In other countries, recent research has shown that PWID access to harm reduction services, despite rapid adaptations, has been negatively impacted. Our study describes these impacts in a rural state.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with PWID, community partners, and healthcare providers in the rural state of Maine (USA). We explored how changes made during the pandemic impacted access to harm reduction services, including basic services (i.e., shelter), syringe service programs, safe drug supply, low barrier treatment, and peer support. Interviews were analyzed using the framework method to apply Penchansky’s model of access, with Saurman’s modification, which includes six dimensions of access—accessibility, availability, acceptability, affordability, accommodation, awareness.

Results

We interviewed thirty-six stakeholders (N = 9 community partners, N = 9 healthcare providers, N = 18 PWID). Policies such as mobile outreach expansion, mail delivery of equipment, and relaxed telemedicine regulations facilitated accessibility to syringe service programs and low barrier buprenorphine treatment. Public health policies, such as social distancing and screening policies, reduced contact, which subsequently reduced acceptability and awareness of many services. Elimination of the one-for-one needle exchange in some areas increased, acceptability (i.e., perception of service), and affordability for PWID. However, some areas actually began enforcing a one-for-one needle exchange policy, which reduced affordability, acceptability, and awareness of services.

Conclusions

Changes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted all dimensions of access to harm reduction services among PWID. While some barriers to harm reduction services were unavoidable during the pandemic, we found that specific policy decisions mitigated service barriers, while other policies exacerbated them. Relaxing needle exchange policies were particularly helpful in facilitating access to harm reduction services by giving community organizations flexibility to adapt to the evolving needs of PWID. These results can inform policies and service delivery to optimally mitigate the negative impacts on PWID during, and beyond, the pandemic.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-022-00660-2.

Peoples' expectations of healthcare: A conceptual review and proposed analytical framework

Expectations shape how one experiences the healthcare one receives. In this paper we argue that the current conceptualisations of expectations within the healthcare literature have much to gain from the many recent and adjacent conceptual developments in other disciplines. The concept of expectations has been extensively studied across disciplines - we review the key texts on the subject in the business, management, social psychology, and sociology literatures to provide a conceptual overview and propose an integrative analytical framework for better understanding individuals' expectations in healthcare. We argue that peoples' expectations of a care encounter are usefully understood as being shaped by their social locations at particular points of time, which is at the intersection of multiple social structures and relations. Peoples' future expectations of care may also be influenced by the experiences of past and current care encounters, framed again by intersecting social structures and relations at that point in time. We demonstrate how an intersectional, translocational and relational analytical approach can allow researchers and practitioners to consider how peoples' social locations shape their expectations of care, not only within a given social environment, but at certain points in time and over time. We emphasise that, given the mobilities and mixing societies are experiencing globally, such an approach is particularly useful for understanding healthcare-related expectations and experiences of all.

Theories of self-care and self-management of long-term conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-ethnography

RATIONALE

The proportion of older adults living with long-term conditions (LTCs) is increasing. Self-care and self-management approaches are seen as valuable in helping older people with LTCs to manage their health and care, yet the theoretical overlaps and divergences are not always clear.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to: (1) systematically identify and appraise studies of self-care or self-management of LTCs by community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥60 years) either informed by, applying, creating, or testing theory; (2) explore similarities or points of convergence between the identified theories; and (3) use a meta-ethnographic approach to synthesise the theories and group related concepts into core constructs.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic theory synthesis, searching six electronic databases. Three reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts followed by full texts and two reviewers appraised study quality. Theoretical data were synthesised within and across individual theories using meta-ethnographic line-of-argument synthesis.

RESULTS

A total of 141 articles (138 studies) and 76 theories were included in the review. Seven core constructs were developed: (1) temporal and spatial context; (2) stressors; (3) personal resources; (4) informal social resources; (5) formal social resources; (6) behavioural adaptations; and (7) quality of life outcomes. A line of argument was developed that conceptualised older adults' self-care and self-management as a dynamic process of behavioural adaptation, enabled by personal resources and informal and formal social resources, aimed at alleviating the impacts of stressors and maintaining quality of life.

CONCLUSION

This synthesis provides an overview of theories used in research on older adults' LTC self-care and self-management. Our synthesis describes the complex interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing self-care and self-management behaviours and provides considerations for future research, intervention design, and implementation. The utility of the constructs in research and practice requires further attention and empirical validation.

Meeting the Challenge of Perinatal Care in Rural Communities

The complexities of providing quality perinatal care within rural communities provide significant challenges to providers and policy makers. Provision of healthcare in rural communities is challenging on individual as well as community-based levels. A quality improvement lens is applied to consider key challenges that pertain to patients, providers, place, and policy. Potential solutions from a provider perspective include nurse-midwifery care and inclusion of advanced practice providers in a variety of specialties in addition to creating care models for registered nurses to practice at the top of their scope. To enhance access in the rural place, telehealth and coordination activities are recommended. Finally, policy approaches such as Perinatal Care Collaboratives, Area Health Education Centers, and enhanced financial resources to eliminate socioeconomic disparities will enhance perinatal care in rural communities.

Dissemination of a telehealth cardiovascular risk service: The CVRS live protocol

BACKGROUND

Medical clinics are increasingly hiring clinical pharmacists to improve management of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the limited number of clinical pharmacists employed in a clinic may not impact the large number of complex patients needing the services. We have developed a remote telehealth service provided by clinical pharmacists to complement CVD services provided by on-site clinical pharmacists and aid sites without a clinical pharmacist. This cardiovascular risk service (CVRS) has been studied in two NIH-funded trials, however, we identified barriers to optimal intervention implementation. The purpose of this study is to examine how to implement the CVRS into medical offices and see if the intervention will be sustained.

METHODS

This is a 5-year, pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial in 13 primary care clinics across the US. We randomized clinics to receive CVRS or usual care and will enroll 325 patient subjects and 288 key stakeholder subjects. We have obtained access to the electronic medical records (EMRs) of all study clinics to recruit subjects and provide the pharmacist intervention. The intervention is staggered so that after 12 months, the usual care sites will receive the intervention for 12 months. Follow-up will be accomplished though medical record abstraction at baseline, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will enroll subjects through 2021 and results will be available in 2024. This study will provide unique information on how the CVRS provided by remote clinical pharmacists can be effectively implemented in medical offices, many of which already employ on-site clinical pharmacists.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

NCT03660631: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03660631.

Identification of Functional, Social, and Health Needs of Older Residents in Nonurban Settings: A Community Risk Assessment

Objectives: We examined functional, social, and health needs and service delivery gaps among a geographically expansive and economically diverse population of older adults to identify service priorities. Methods: We conducted analyses based on 1280 respondents aged 60 years and older surveyed for an 8-county needs assessment. Results: We identified three distinct risk profiles using two-step cluster analysis. ANOVA and chi-square analyses revealed significant differences between risk profiles on a range of health and social service needs. Discussion: Identifying high-risk residents can support community providers' efforts to help older adults age in place. Community-based organizations are well-positioned to respond early to social determinants of health needs. Targeting services and supports that reduce risk, extend independence, and prevent avoidable adverse healthcare situations to improve health and achieve health equity among historically underserved and hard-to-reach populations and prioritizing low-cost community interventions can reduce the need for high-cost interventions (e.g., emergency care and hospitalizations).

Prevalence of and factors associated with depression among hill tribe individuals aged 30 years and over in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Depression is a silent health problem that can lead to severe and sometimes fatal outcomes if individuals are not diagnosed and treated properly; this is particularly true in populations with limited education, low economic status and several barriers to accessing health services, such as the hill tribe people in Thailand.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the prevalence of and factors associated with depression among hill tribe individuals aged 30 years and over. A validated questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used for data collection in an interview format in a private and confidential room. Logistic regression was used to detect the associations of variables with depression at a significance level of α = 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 2,552 participants were recruited for the analysis; 65.9% were females, 79.9% were married, 35.8% were aged 50 years and over, and 54.2% were Buddhist. The majority were uneducated (76.7%), were agriculturalists (48.4%), and had a low family income (71.2%). The overall prevalence of depression was 12.0%. In the multivariate analysis, eight variables were found to be significantly associated with depression among hill tribe adults aged 30 years and over in Thailand. Being female, 50 years or older, married, and Christian; living with a relative; smoking; using opium; and having moderate and high stress levels were associated with depression.

CONCLUSION

Effective public health interventions should be considered to reduce the burden of depression in the hill tribe population by focusing on individuals who are female, 50 years or older, married, Christian, and stressed and those who abuse substances.