1
|
Bell JS, La Caze A, Steeper M, Haines TP, Hilmer SN, Troeung L, Quirke L, Wesson J, Pond CD, Buys L, Ghahreman-Falconer N, Lawless MT, Shrestha S, Martini A, Ochieng N, Glamorgan F, Lagasca C, Walton R, Cenin D, Kitson A, Jung M, Bennett A, Cross AJ. Evidence-based Medication knowledge Brokers in Residential Aged CarE (EMBRACE): protocol for a helix-counterbalanced randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2024; 19:24. [PMID: 38438918 PMCID: PMC10913248 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01353-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical practice guidelines recommend against the routine use of psychotropic medications in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Knowledge brokers are individuals or groups who facilitate the transfer of knowledge into practice. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using knowledge brokers to translate Australia's new Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Psychotropic Medications in People Living with Dementia and in Residential Aged Care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Evidence-based Medication knowledge Brokers in Residential Aged CarE (EMBRACE) trial is a helix-counterbalanced randomised controlled trial. The 12-month trial will be conducted in up to 19 RACFs operated by four Australian aged care provider organisations in Victoria, New South Wales, Western Australia and Queensland. RACFs will be randomised to receive three levels of implementation strategies (knowledge broker service, pharmacist-led quality use of medications education activities and distribution of the Guidelines and supporting materials) across three medication contexts (antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants). Implementation strategies will be delivered by an embedded on-site aged care pharmacist working at a system level across each participating RACF. All RACFs will receive all implementation strategies simultaneously but for different medication contexts. The primary outcome will be a composite dichotomous measure of 6-month RACF-level concordance with Guideline recommendations and good practice statements among people using antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants for changed behaviours. Secondary outcomes will include proportion of residents with Guideline concordant use of antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants measured at the RACF-level and proportion of residents with psychotropic medication use, hospitalisation, falls, falls with injury, polypharmacy, quality of life, activities of daily living, medication incidents and behavioural incidents measured at the RACF-level. DISCUSSION The EMBRACE trial investigates a novel guideline implementation strategy to improve the safe and effective use of psychotropic medications in RACFs. We anticipate that the findings will provide new information on the potential role of knowledge brokers for successful and cost-effective guideline implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12623001141639. Registered 6 November 2023 - retrospectively registered, https://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Simon Bell
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| | - Adam La Caze
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Dutton Park, QLD, Australia
| | - Michelle Steeper
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Terry P Haines
- Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- New South Wales Therapeutic Advisory Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lakkhina Troeung
- Brightwater Research Centre, Brightwater Care Group, Inglewood, WA, Australia
| | | | - Jacqueline Wesson
- Ageing and Health Research Unit, Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Constance Dimity Pond
- Wicking Dementia Research and Teaching Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Laurie Buys
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nazanin Ghahreman-Falconer
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Dutton Park, QLD, Australia
- Pharmacy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael T Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Shakti Shrestha
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Dutton Park, QLD, Australia
| | - Angelita Martini
- Brightwater Research Centre, Brightwater Care Group, Inglewood, WA, Australia
| | - Nancy Ochieng
- Lifeview Corporate Lifeview Pty Ltd., Carnegie, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Carmela Lagasca
- Anglicare Southern Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia
| | - Rebecca Walton
- Brightwater Research Centre, Brightwater Care Group, Inglewood, WA, Australia
| | - Dayna Cenin
- Brightwater Research Centre, Brightwater Care Group, Inglewood, WA, Australia
| | - Alison Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Monica Jung
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | | | - Amanda J Cross
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lawless MT, Tieu M, Golley R, Kitson A. How and where does "care" fit within seminal life-course approaches? A narrative review and critical analysis. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80:871-883. [PMID: 37684708 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To map the concepts of the caring life-course theory that are used in life-course approaches from different disciplines; establish whether there is a common recognition of, or language used, to describe care in those life-course approaches; and identify the role and contribution of care to the life-course literature. DESIGN This discursive paper uses a narrative review process to explore points of convergence and divergence between life-course approaches and the caring life-course theory. METHODS Categories for analysis were developed deductively and inductively, focusing on the constructs of fundamental care, capacity and capability, care network, care transition, care trajectory and care biography. RESULTS We identified four disciplinary perspectives: (1) life-course sociology; (2) life-course epidemiology; (3) lifespan developmental psychology; and (4) life-course health development. While six core constructs of the caring life-course theory were described, either explicitly or implicitly, in existing life-course approaches, no single approach fully describes the role and contribution of care across the lifespan. CONCLUSION Life-course approaches have largely neglected the contribution and role of care in informing the life-course discourse. This review highlights the significance of care beyond traditional healthcare settings and recognizes it as a fundamental human need for well-being and development, which can contribute to existing life-course literature. IMPLICATION FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE There is a need to understand care as a complex system and embrace a whole-system, life-course approach to enable nurses and other healthcare professionals to provide high-quality, patient-centred care. IMPACT Incorporating care within a life-course approach provides opportunities to integrate and deliver care centred around the person, their life transitions, trajectories and care networks, including informal carers and healthcare professionals. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients or members of the public were not involved in this study as it is a discursive paper based on the relevant literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew Tieu
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rebecca Golley
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alison Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lawless MT, Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Pinero de Plaza MA, Kitson AL. My Wellbeing Journal: Development of a communication and goal-setting tool to improve care for older adults with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Health Expect 2023; 27:e13890. [PMID: 37830439 PMCID: PMC10726145 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic conditions and multimorbidity, the presence of two or more chronic conditions, are increasingly common in older adults. Effective management of chronic conditions and multimorbidity in older adults requires a collaborative and person-centred approach that considers the individual's goals, preferences and priorities. However, ensuring high-quality personalised care for older adults with multimorbidity can be challenging due to the complexity of their care needs, limited time and a lack of patient preparation to discuss their personal goals and preferences with their healthcare team. OBJECTIVE To codesign a communication and goal-setting tool, My Wellbeing Journal, to support personalised care planning for older adults with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. DESIGN We drew on an experience-based codesign approach to develop My Wellbeing Journal. This article reports on the final end-user feedback, which was collected via an online survey with older adults and their carers. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Older adults with chronic conditions, multimorbidity and informal carers living in Australia. Personalised care planning was considered in the context of primary care. RESULTS A total of 88 participants completed the online survey. The survey focused on participants' feedback on the tool in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction and errors encountered. This feedback resulted in modifications to My Wellbeing Journal, which can be used during clinical encounters to facilitate communication, goal setting and progress tracking. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Clinicians and carers can use the tool to guide discussions with older adults about their care planning and help them set realistic goals that are meaningful to them. The findings of this study could be used to inform the development of recommendations for healthcare providers to implement person-centred, goal-oriented care for older adults with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Older adults living with chronic conditions and multimorbidity and their carers have contributed to the development of a tool that has the potential to significantly enhance the experience of personalised care planning. Their direct involvement as collaborators has ensured that the tool is optimised to meet the standards of effectiveness and usability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health SciencesFlinders UniversityBedford ParkSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Mandy M. Archibald
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health SciencesFlinders UniversityBedford ParkSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Helen Glass Centre for NursingCollege of NursingWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | | | | | - Alison L. Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health SciencesFlinders UniversityBedford ParkSouth AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Archibald MM, Lawless MT, de Plaza MAP, Kitson AL. How transdisciplinary research teams learn to do knowledge translation (KT), and how KT in turn impacts transdisciplinary research: a realist evaluation and longitudinal case study. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:20. [PMID: 36944997 PMCID: PMC10032009 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00967-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transdisciplinary research and knowledge translation are increasingly regarded as key concepts underpinning applied research across the health and social sciences, due to their presumed potential in addressing complex, "wicked" problems and improving the use of research in practice and policy, respectively. Despite sharing an impact mandate, the relationship between transdisciplinary research collaboration and knowledge translation remains unclear. In response, we examined the relationship between transdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge translation to generate these understandings with a view towards maximizing the impact of collaborative efforts. METHODS We undertook a realist evaluation and longitudinal case study of a 5-year National Health and Medical Research Council-funded Centre of Research Excellence in Transdisciplinary Frailty Research. Data were collected between February 2017 and March 2020 over three rounds of theory development, refinement and testing using interviews, observation, document review and visual elicitation as data sources. The Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Adelaide approved this study. RESULTS Iterative analysis of narrative interviews and visual data led to the development of three overarching programme theories explicating the reciprocal relationship between KT understandings and transdisciplinary team process. These programme theories revolve around the concept of a network, which we define in alignment with extant theoretical literature on network mechanisms and complex networks as graphically representable networks of agents/people (nodes) joined by social relationships (links). Our findings demonstrate that under the right contextual conditions, transdisciplinary team members respond through an improved ability to (1) navigate the network, (2) negotiate the network and (3) mobilize the network. CONCLUSIONS This research demonstrates the reciprocity and mutually supportive relationship between transdisciplinary research and knowledge translation. Our findings suggest that embedding a collaborative knowledge translation framework and providing resources such as facilitation and distributed leadership within a transdisciplinary team can improve collaboration and support transdisciplinary research objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy M Archibald
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
- College of Nursing, Helen Glass Centre for Nursing, University of Manitoba, 99 Curry Place, Winnipeg, Canada.
| | - Michael T Lawless
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Alison L Kitson
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lawless MT, Tieu M, Chan RJ, Hendriks JM, Kitson A. Instruments Measuring Self-Care and Self-Management of Chronic Conditions by Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review. J Appl Gerontol 2023:7334648231161929. [PMID: 36880688 DOI: 10.1177/07334648231161929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Given the high prevalence of chronic conditions and multimorbidity in older adults, there is a need to better conceptualize and measure self-care and self-management to promote a person-centered approach. This scoping review aimed to identify and map instruments measuring self-care and self-management of chronic conditions by older adults. We searched six electronic databases, charted data from the studies and tools and reported the results in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A total of 107 articles (103 studies) containing 40 tools were included in the review. There was substantial variation in the tools in terms of their aims and scope, structure, theoretical foundations, how they were developed, and the settings in which they have been used. The quantity of tools demonstrates the importance of assessing self-care and self-management. Consideration of the purpose, scope, and theoretical foundation should guide decisions about tools suitable for use in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Matthew Tieu
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jeroen M Hendriks
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Alison Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lawless MT, Hunter SC, Pinero de Plaza MA, Archibald MM, Kitson AL. "You Are By No Means Alone": A Netnographic Study of Self-Care Support in an Online Community for Older Adults. Qual Health Res 2022; 32:1935-1951. [PMID: 36062369 DOI: 10.1177/10497323221124979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Online peer-to-peer communities provide environments in which people with similar health concerns can interact and exchange information that can support self-care of long-term conditions. However, current theories have not adequately accounted for how self-care support is enacted in online communities. We conducted an observational netnography to identify and analyze posts in a publicly accessible online community (discussion forum boards) designed for older people. A Straussian grounded theory approach was used to examine 659 posts in health-related message boards. Self-care support involved the construction of three interrelated identities: (1) the support seeking self, in which members described problems and requested information; (2) the empathizing self, in which they described similar experiences and offered support; and (3) the influencing self, in which they provided information or advice. Online communities appear to be an important source of peer support and information and may be a cost-effective approach to supplement standard care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sarah C Hunter
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Mandy M Archibald
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Nursing, Helen Glass Centre for Nursing, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Alison L Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, 1065Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lawless MT, Drioli-Phillips P, Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Kitson AL. Communicating with older adults with long-term conditions about self-management goals: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:2439-2452. [PMID: 33658141 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesise a body of fine-grained observational research on communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs), older adults, and carers regarding self-management goals and actions. METHODS We conducted a systematic review, searching nine electronic databases and the grey literature. Two reviewers independently selected for inclusion following a two-stage process and studies and discrepancies were resolved through consultation with the review team. RESULTS 898 records were retrieved, and eight studies were included in the review. Aggregative thematic analysis resulted in 13 categories of communication practices across three decision-making domains: (1) initiating: actions occurring prior to the commitment point; (2) proposing: putting forward a course of action; and (3) committing and closing: committing (or not) to the course of action. CONCLUSIONS Despite an increasing emphasis on the importance of personalised care planning and shared decision-making (SDM) to support older people's health and wellbeing, HCPs did not consistently practice this approach and, in some cases, worked in opposition to it. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS We encourage HCPs to prepare older adults to engage actively with SDM and the goal setting process by employing patient-centred communication resources. These could assist with identifying different types of goals that are realistic and relevant to patients in daily life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | | | - Mandy M Archibald
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia; College of Nursing Helen Glass Centre for Nursing, 99 Curry Place University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
| | - Rachel C Ambagtsheer
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Torrens University Australia, 88 Wakefield Street, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Alison L Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lawless MT, Tieu M, Feo R, Kitson AL. Theories of self-care and self-management of long-term conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-ethnography. Soc Sci Med 2021; 287:114393. [PMID: 34534780 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE The proportion of older adults living with long-term conditions (LTCs) is increasing. Self-care and self-management approaches are seen as valuable in helping older people with LTCs to manage their health and care, yet the theoretical overlaps and divergences are not always clear. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this review were to: (1) systematically identify and appraise studies of self-care or self-management of LTCs by community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥60 years) either informed by, applying, creating, or testing theory; (2) explore similarities or points of convergence between the identified theories; and (3) use a meta-ethnographic approach to synthesise the theories and group related concepts into core constructs. METHODS We conducted a systematic theory synthesis, searching six electronic databases. Three reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts followed by full texts and two reviewers appraised study quality. Theoretical data were synthesised within and across individual theories using meta-ethnographic line-of-argument synthesis. RESULTS A total of 141 articles (138 studies) and 76 theories were included in the review. Seven core constructs were developed: (1) temporal and spatial context; (2) stressors; (3) personal resources; (4) informal social resources; (5) formal social resources; (6) behavioural adaptations; and (7) quality of life outcomes. A line of argument was developed that conceptualised older adults' self-care and self-management as a dynamic process of behavioural adaptation, enabled by personal resources and informal and formal social resources, aimed at alleviating the impacts of stressors and maintaining quality of life. CONCLUSION This synthesis provides an overview of theories used in research on older adults' LTC self-care and self-management. Our synthesis describes the complex interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing self-care and self-management behaviours and provides considerations for future research, intervention design, and implementation. The utility of the constructs in research and practice requires further attention and empirical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lawless
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
| | - Matthew Tieu
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Rebecca Feo
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Alison L Kitson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia; Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Archibald MM, Lawless MT, Ambagtsheer RC, Kitson AL. Understanding consumer perceptions of frailty screening to inform knowledge translation and health service improvements. Age Ageing 2021; 50:227-232. [PMID: 33006601 PMCID: PMC7793601 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES despite growing support for the clinical application of frailty, including regular frailty screening for older adults, little is known about how older adults perceive frailty screening. The purpose of this study was to examine older adults' perspectives on frailty screening to inform knowledge translation and service improvements for older adults with frailty. RESEARCH DESIGN interpretive descriptive qualitative design. PARTICIPANTS a total of 39 non-frail (18%), pre-frail (33%) and frail or very frail (49%) South Australian older adults aged 62-99 years, sampled from community, assisted living and residential aged care settings. METHODS seven focus groups were conducted and analysed by two independent investigators using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS three themes were identified. First, older adults question the necessity and logic of an objective frailty measure. Second, older adults believe any efforts at frailty screening need to culminate in an action. Third, older adults emphasise that frailty screening needs to be conducted sensitively given negative perceptions of the term frailty and the potential adverse effects of frailty labelling. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS previous screening experiences and underlying beliefs about the nature of frailty as inevitable shaped openness to, and acceptance of, frailty screening. Findings correspond with previous research illuminating the lack of public awareness of frailty and the nascent stage of frailty screening implementation. Incorporating consumer perspectives, along with perspectives of other stakeholder groups when considering implementing frailty screening, is likely to impact uptake and optimise suitability-important considerations in person-centred care provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy M Archibald
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences , University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042 Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Michael T Lawless
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042 Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Alison L Kitson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042 Australia
- Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hunter SC, Young JA, Lawless MT, Kitson AL, Feo R. Introducing an interactional approach to exploring facilitation as an implementation intervention: examining the utility of Conversation Analysis. Implement Sci Commun 2020; 1:98. [PMID: 33292862 PMCID: PMC7640407 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00071-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The widely adopted integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework identifies facilitation as a 'core ingredient' for successful implementation. Indeed, most implementation scientists agree that a certain degree of facilitation is required to translate research into clinical practice; that is, there must be some intentional effort to assist the implementation of evidence-based approaches and practices into healthcare. Yet understandings of what constitutes facilitation and how to facilitate effectively remain largely theoretical and, therefore, provide scant practical guidance to ensure facilitator success. Implementation Science theories and frameworks often describe facilitation as an activity accomplished in, and through, formal and informal communication amongst facilitators and those involved in the implementation process (i.e. 'recipients'). However, the specific communication practices that constitute and enable effective facilitation are currently inadequately understood. AIM In this debate article, we argue that without effective facilitation-a practice requiring significant interactional and interpersonal skills-many implementation projects encounter difficulties. Therefore, we explore whether and how the application of Conversation Analysis, a rigorous research methodology for researching patterns of interaction, could expand existing understandings of facilitation within the Implementation Science field. First, we illustrate how Conversation Analysis methods can be applied to identifying what facilitation looks like in interaction. Second, we draw from existing conversation analytic research into facilitation outside of Implementation Science to expand current understandings of how facilitation might be achieved within implementation. CONCLUSION In this paper, we argue that conversation analytic methods show potential to understand and refine facilitation as a critical, and inherently interactional, component of implementation efforts. Conversation analytic investigations of facilitation as it occurs in real-time between participants could inform mechanisms to (1) improve understandings of how to achieve successful implementation through facilitation, (2) overcome difficulties and challenges in implementation related to interpersonal communication and interaction, (3) inform future facilitator training and (4) inform refinement of existing facilitation theories and frameworks (e.g. i-PARIHS) currently used in implementation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C. Hunter
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
| | - Jessica A. Young
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
- Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 3 K7 Canada
| | - Michael T. Lawless
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
| | - Alison L. Kitson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
| | - Rebecca Feo
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lawless MT, Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Kitson AL. Factors influencing communication about frailty in primary care: A scoping review. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103:436-450. [PMID: 31551158 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarise the available evidence on the factors influencing communication about frailty in the primary care setting. METHODS We conducted a scoping review, searching five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ProQuest) for studies addressing communication about frailty in primary care practice. Reference list and grey literature searching was conducted to identify additional articles. A narrative descriptive method was used to synthesise the findings. RESULTS The search identified 3185 articles and 37 were included in the review. We identified five categories of factors influencing communication about frailty at the consumer, healthcare provider, and system levels: (1) consumer perceptions, information needs, and communication preferences; (2) healthcare providers' knowledge, capacities, and attitudes; (3) clinical communication skills and training; (4) availability of information and communication technologies; and (5) care coordination, collaboration, and case management. CONCLUSION Findings offer considerations for the design and delivery of initiatives to improve communication about frailty in primary care both at the local clinical level and at the broader level of healthcare service delivery. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Healthcare providers and systems require practical, evidence-informed guidance regarding the development of a systematic approach to the quality and timing of communication about frailty in healthcare encounters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lawless
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Transdisciplinary Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Mandy M Archibald
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Transdisciplinary Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Alison L Kitson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Transdisciplinary Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically map and synthesise the literature on older adults' perceptions and experiences of integrated care. SETTING Various healthcare settings, including primary care, hospitals, allied health practices and emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged ≥60 years. INTERVENTIONS Integrated (or similarly coordinated) healthcare. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Using scoping review methodology, four electronic databases (EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses) and the grey literature (Open Grey and Google Scholar) were searched to identify studies reporting on older adults' experiences of integrated care. Studies reporting on empirical, interpretive and critical research using any type of methodology were included. Four independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and analysis. RESULTS The initial search retrieved 436 articles, of which 30 were included in this review. Patients expressed a desire for continuity, both in terms of care relationships and management, seamless transitions between care services and/or settings, and coordinated care that delivers quick access, effective treatment, self-care support, respect for patient preferences, and involves carers and families. CONCLUSIONS Participants across the studies desired accessible, efficient and coordinated care that caters to their needs and preferences, while keeping in mind their rights and safety. This review highlights the salience of the relational, informational and organisational aspects of care from an older person's perspective. Findings are transferable and could be applied in various healthcare settings to derive patient-centred success measures that reflect the aspects of integrated care that are deemed important to older adults and their supporters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Lawless
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Amy Marshall
- Adelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Manasi Murthy Mittinty
- Pain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gillian Harvey
- Adelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lawless MT, Drioli-Phillips P, Archibald MM, Kitson AL. Engaging older adults in self-management talk in healthcare encounters: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2020; 9:15. [PMID: 31948463 PMCID: PMC6964206 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-1276-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines for the management of complex chronic conditions in older adults encourage healthcare providers to engage patients in shared decision-making about self-management goals and actions. Yet, healthcare decision-making and communication for this population can pose significant challenges. As a result, healthcare professionals may struggle to help patients define and prioritise their values, goals, and preferences in ways that are clinically and personally meaningful, incorporating physical functioning and quality of life, when faced with numerous diagnostic and treatment alternatives. The aim of this systematic review is to locate and synthesise a body of fine-grained observational research on communication between professionals, older adults, and carers regarding self-management in audio/audio-visually recorded naturalistic interactions. METHODS/DESIGN The paper describes a systematic review of the published conversation analytic and discourse analytic research, using an aggregative thematic approach and following the PRISMA-P guidelines. This review will include studies reporting on adult patients (female or male) aged ≥ 60 years whose consultations are conducted in English in any healthcare setting and stakeholders involved in their care, e.g. general practitioners, nurses, allied health professionals, and family carers. We will search nine electronic databases and the grey literature and two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts to identify potential studies. Discrepancies will be resolved via consultation with the review team. The methodological quality of the final set of included studies will be appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and a detailed description of the characteristics of the included studies using a customised template. DISCUSSION This is the first systematic review to date to locate and synthesise the conversation analytic research on how healthcare professionals raise and pursue talk about self-management with older adults in routine clinical interactions. Amalgamating these findings will enable the identification of effective and potentially trainable communication practices for engaging older adults in healthcare decision-making about the self-management goals and actions that enable the greatest possible health and quality of life in older adulthood. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019139376.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Lawless
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042 Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | | | - Mandy M. Archibald
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA Australia
- Helen Glass Centre for Nursing, University of Manitoba, 99 Curry Place, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Alison L. Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042 Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, SA Australia
| |
Collapse
|