1
|
Irvine MA, Bardwell S, Williams S, Liu L, Ge W, Kinniburgh B, Coombs D, Buxton JA. Estimating the total utilization of take home naloxone during an unregulated drug toxicity crisis: A Bayesian modeling approach. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 128:104454. [PMID: 38788389 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND British Columbia (BC) Canada has a large take-home naloxone (THN) program, implemented as part of the provincial response to the ongoing toxic unregulated drug supply emergency. Ascertaining the rate of use of THN kits is vital to understanding the full impact of the program. However, this is a challenging problem due to under-reporting of kit distribution. This study aims to estimate the total number of THN kits used based on the number of THN kits shipped, the number of THN kits reported as distributed, and the number of THN kits reported as used. METHODS We used BC THN shipment and distribution records (February 2015 to August 2023) to inform a simple Bayesian model of naloxone kit distribution and use. A logistic regression term by health region and distribution site type was incorporated to account for variable under-reporting, and a convolution term was incorporated to account for kit distribution. RESULTS We find the number of THN kits reported as used, and the number of total THN kits distributed, are largely under-reported. An estimated 1,500 (95 % CrI: 1,430 - 1,590) THN kits per 10,000 BC population were used, of which 288 per 10,000 had been reported as used. Of all the THN kits shipped, the model estimated that 43 % (95 % CrI: 41-45 %) of kits were used. We also found variation in both distribution and use by distribution site type, with kits distributed from overdose prevention sites having the highest rate of use (56 %; 95 % CrI: 53-59 %). CONCLUSION Across all sites, kit use is approximately five times higher than has been reported. Our framework can also be applied to other localities where THN programs operate, in order to better estimate the true reach and impact of take home naloxone distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Irvine
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Samantha Bardwell
- Mathematics Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Lisa Liu
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wenxue Ge
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Daniel Coombs
- Mathematics Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jane A Buxton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller NM, Campbell C, Shorter GW. Barriers and facilitators of naloxone and safe injection facility interventions to reduce opioid drug-related deaths: A qualitative analysis. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 117:104049. [PMID: 37247475 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid drug-related deaths continue to be a significant public health concern in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) and Northern Ireland (NI). While both regions have implemented naloxone to reduce drug related deaths, there remains a gap in the implementation of a supervised injection facility (SIF). This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing naloxone and a SIF to reduce opioid drug-related deaths in ROI and NI. METHODS Semi-structured interviews (n=23) were conducted in ROI and NI with experts by experience (n=8), staff from low threshold services (n=9), and individuals involved in policy making (n= 6). Data were analyzed using coding reliability Thematic Analysis and were informed by the Risk Environmental Framework. RESULTS The findings illustrated that stigma within the media, health centers, and the community was a significant barrier to naloxone distribution and SIF implementation. Policing and community intimidation were reported to hinder naloxone carriage in both the ROI and NI, while threats of paramilitary violence towards people who use drugs were unique to NI. Municipal government delays and policy maker apathy were reported to hinder SIF implementation in the ROI. Participants suggested peer-to-peer naloxone delivery and amending legislation to facilitate non-prescription naloxone would increase naloxone uptake. Participants recommended using webinars, Town Halls, and a Citizens' Assembly as tools to advocate for SIF implementation. CONCLUSION Local and regional stigma reduction campaigns are needed in conjunction with policy changes to advance naloxone and a SIF. Tailoring stigma campaigns to incorporate the lived experience of people who use drugs, their family members, and the general community can aid in educating the public and change negative perceptions. This study highlights the need for ongoing efforts to reduce stigma and increase accessibility to evidence-based interventions to address opioid drug-related deaths in the ROI, NI, and internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gillian W Shorter
- Drug and Alcohol Research Network & Centre for Improving Health Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holmén E, Warnqvist A, Kåberg M. Sweden's first Take-Home Naloxone program: participant characteristics, dose endpoints and predictors for overdose reversals. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:24. [PMID: 37087485 PMCID: PMC10121425 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00533-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid overdoses are a growing concern, particularly among people who inject drugs. Sweden, with a comparatively high proportion of drug-related mortality, introduced its first Take-Home Naloxone (THN) program in 2018, at the Stockholm needle and syringe program (NSP). In this study we compare THN participant characteristics regarding refills and overdose reversals as well as investigate predictors associated with number of reversals. We also investigate interventions performed in overdose situations and endpoints for naloxone doses. METHODS This was a prospective open inclusion cohort study conducted between January 24th 2018 and March 31st 2022 at the Stockholm NSP. Participants received THN, free of charge, after a training session and provided data regarding drug use and overdose experiences. During refill visits, participants reported if the naloxone was used for overdose reversal and, if so, responded to a ten-item questionnaire which included stating whether the naloxone recipient was the participant themselves or somebody else. Questionnaire data was combined with NSP database demographic data. Zero-inflated Poisson regression was applied to analyse predictors for number of reported overdose reversals. RESULTS Among study participants (n = 1,295), 66.5% stated opioids as their primary drug, and 61.4% and 81.0% had previous experience of a personal or witnessed overdose, respectively. Overall, 44.0% of participants reported a total of 1,625 overdose reversals and the victim was known to have survived in 95.6% of cases. Stimulant use (aIRR 1.26; 95% CI 1.01, 1.58), benzodiazepine use (aIRR 1.75; 95% CI 1.1, 2.78) and homelessness (aIRR 1.35; 95% CI 1.06, 1.73) were predictors associated with an increased number of reported overdose reversals. Mortality was higher among those who reported at least one overdose reversal (HR 3.4; 95% CI 2.2, 5.2). CONCLUSIONS An NSP's existent framework can be utilised to effectively implement a THN program, provide basic training and reach numerous high-risk individuals. During the four-year study, THN participants reversed a sizeable number of potentially fatal overdoses, of which many were reported by participants whose primary drug was not opioids. Naloxone refill rate was high, indicating that participants were motivated to maintain a supply of naloxone in case of future overdose events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Holmén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Stockholm Needle and Syringe Program, Stockholm Centre for Dependency Disorders, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Anna Warnqvist
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Kåberg
- Stockholm Needle and Syringe Program, Stockholm Centre for Dependency Disorders, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jennings LK, Ward R, Pekar E, Szwast E, Sox L, Hying J, Mccauley J, Obeid JS, Lenert LA. The effectiveness of a noninterruptive alert to increase prescription of take-home naloxone in emergency departments. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023; 30:683-691. [PMID: 36718091 PMCID: PMC10018256 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Opioid-related overdose (OD) deaths continue to increase. Take-home naloxone (THN), after treatment for an OD in an emergency department (ED), is a recommended but under-utilized practice. To promote THN prescription, we developed a noninterruptive decision support intervention that combined a detailed OD documentation template with a reminder to use the template that is automatically inserted into a provider's note by decision rules. We studied the impact of the combined intervention on THN prescribing in a longitudinal observational study. METHODS ED encounters involving an OD were reviewed before and after implementation of the reminder embedded in the physicians' note to use an advanced OD documentation template for changes in: (1) use of the template and (2) prescription of THN. Chi square tests and interrupted time series analyses were used to assess the impact. Usability and satisfaction were measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Net Promoter Score. RESULTS In 736 OD cases defined by International Classification of Disease version 10 diagnosis codes (247 prereminder and 489 postreminder), the documentation template was used in 0.0% and 21.3%, respectively (P < .0001). The sensitivity and specificity of the reminder for OD cases were 95.9% and 99.8%, respectively. Use of the documentation template led to twice the rate of prescribing of THN (25.7% vs 50.0%, P < .001). Of 19 providers responding to the survey, 74% of SUS responses were in the good-to-excellent range and 53% of providers were Net Promoters. CONCLUSIONS A noninterruptive decision support intervention was associated with higher THN prescribing in a pre-post study across a multiinstitution health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey K Jennings
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ralph Ward
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ekaterina Pekar
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth Szwast
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Luke Sox
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph Hying
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jenna Mccauley
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Addiction Sciences Division, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jihad S Obeid
- Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Leslie A Lenert
- Corresponding Author: Leslie A. Lenert, MD, Biomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 22 West Edge Suite 13, Charleston, SC 29425, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perreault M, Ferlatte MA, Lachapelle É, Tremblay G, Milton D. Implementation facilitators and barriers to the expansion of a peer-led overdose prevention program. DRUGS: EDUCATION, PREVENTION AND POLICY 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/09687637.2023.2178880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Perreault
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Diana Milton
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Olding M, Boyd J, Kerr T, Fowler A, McNeil R. (Re)situating expertise in community-based overdose response: Insights from an ethnographic study of overdose prevention sites (OPS) in Vancouver, Canada. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 111:103929. [PMID: 36529032 PMCID: PMC10184134 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Overdose Prevention Sites (OPS) are low-barrier services where people may use illicit drugs under the monitoring of staff trained to provide life-saving care in the event of an overdose. In British Columbia (BC), Canada, OPS have been rapidly scaled-up as a community-based response to the overdose crisis and are staffed primarily by community members who are also people who use drugs (PWUD). While it is known that PWUD perform vital roles in OPS and other community-based overdose interventions, the expertise and expert knowledge of PWUD in this work remains under-theorised. This study draws on 20 months of ethnographic fieldwork in Vancouver, BC (July 2018 to March 2020), to explore how OPS responders who are PWUD developed and enacted expertise in overdose response. Ethnographic fieldwork focused on four OPS located in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES) and Downtown South neighbourhoods. Methods included 100 hours of observation in the sites and surrounding areas, three site-specific focus groups with OPS responders (n=20), and semi-structured interviews with OPS responders (n=14) and service users (n=23). Data was analysed with the aim of characterizing the knowledge underpinning responders' expertise, and the arrangements which allow for the formation and enactment of expertise. We found that OPS responders' expertise was grounded in experiential knowledge acquired through their positionality as PWUD and members of a broader community of activists engaged in mutual aid. Responders became skilled in overdose response through frequent practice and drew on their experiential and embodied knowledge of overdose to provide care that was both technically proficient and responsive to the broader needs of PWUD (e.g. protection from criminalization and stigmatizing treatment). Responders emphasized that the spatial arrangements of OPS supported the development of expertise by facilitating more specialized and comprehensive overdose care. OPS became sites of collective expertise around overdose management as responder teams developed shared understandings of overdose management, including processes for managing uncertainty, delegating team responsibilities, and sharing decision-making. This research re-situates theoretical understandings of expertise in community-based overdose response with implications for overdose prevention interventions. Findings underscore the experiential and embodied expertise of PWUD as community-based responders; the importance of supportive environments and team-based approaches for overdose response; and the benefits of community-driven training that extends beyond technical skills of overdose identification and naloxone administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Olding
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jade Boyd
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Thomas Kerr
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Al Fowler
- East Vancouver Activist, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ryan McNeil
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rajabali F, Turcotte K, Zheng A, Purssell R, Buxton JA, Pike I. The impact of poisoning in British Columbia: a cost analysis. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E160-E168. [PMID: 36787989 PMCID: PMC9933990 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poisoning, from substances such as illicit drugs, prescribed and over-the-counter medications, alcohol, pesticides, gases and household cleaners, is the leading cause of injury-related death and the second leading cause for injury-related hospital admission in British Columbia. We examined the health and economic costs of poisoning in BC for 2016, using a societal perspective, to support public health policies aimed at minimizing losses to society. METHODS Costs by intent, sex and age group were calculated in Canadian dollars using a classification and costing framework based on existing provincial injury data combined with data from the published literature. Direct cost components included fatal poisonings, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, ambulance attendance without transfer to hospital and calls to the British Columbia Drug and Poison Information Centre (BC DPIC) not resulting in ambulance attendance, emergency care or transfer to hospital. Indirect costs, measured as loss of earnings and informal caregiving costs, were also calculated. RESULTS We estimate that poisonings in BC totalled $812.5 million in 2016 with $108.9 million in direct health care costs and $703.6 million in indirect costs. Unintentional poisoning injuries accounted for 84% of total costs, 46% of direct costs and 89% of indirect costs. Males accounted for higher proportions of direct costs for all patient dispositions except hospital admissions. Patients aged 25-64 years accounted for higher proportions of direct costs except for calls to BC DPIC, where proportions were highest for children younger than 15 years. INTERPRETATION Hospital care expenditures represented the largest direct cost of poisoning, and lost productivity following death represented the largest indirect cost. Quantifying and understanding the financial burden of poisoning has implications not only for government and health care, but also for society, employers, patients and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahra Rajabali
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit (Rajabali, Turcotte, Zheng, Pike), BC Children's Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine (Purssell), University of British Columbia; BC Drug and Poison Information Centre (Purssell, Buxton); School of Population and Public Health (Buxton), University of British Columbia; Department of Pediatrics (Pike), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Kate Turcotte
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit (Rajabali, Turcotte, Zheng, Pike), BC Children's Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine (Purssell), University of British Columbia; BC Drug and Poison Information Centre (Purssell, Buxton); School of Population and Public Health (Buxton), University of British Columbia; Department of Pediatrics (Pike), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Alex Zheng
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit (Rajabali, Turcotte, Zheng, Pike), BC Children's Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine (Purssell), University of British Columbia; BC Drug and Poison Information Centre (Purssell, Buxton); School of Population and Public Health (Buxton), University of British Columbia; Department of Pediatrics (Pike), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Roy Purssell
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit (Rajabali, Turcotte, Zheng, Pike), BC Children's Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine (Purssell), University of British Columbia; BC Drug and Poison Information Centre (Purssell, Buxton); School of Population and Public Health (Buxton), University of British Columbia; Department of Pediatrics (Pike), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jane A Buxton
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit (Rajabali, Turcotte, Zheng, Pike), BC Children's Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine (Purssell), University of British Columbia; BC Drug and Poison Information Centre (Purssell, Buxton); School of Population and Public Health (Buxton), University of British Columbia; Department of Pediatrics (Pike), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Ian Pike
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit (Rajabali, Turcotte, Zheng, Pike), BC Children's Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine (Purssell), University of British Columbia; BC Drug and Poison Information Centre (Purssell, Buxton); School of Population and Public Health (Buxton), University of British Columbia; Department of Pediatrics (Pike), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ackermann E, Kievit B, Xavier J, Barbic S, Ferguson M, Greer A, Loyal J, Mamdani Z, Palis H, Pauly B, Slaunwhite A, Buxton JA. Awareness and knowledge of the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act among people at risk of witnessing an overdose in British Columbia, Canada: a multi-methods cross sectional study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:42. [PMID: 35614474 PMCID: PMC9131579 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00472-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Bystanders to drug overdoses often avoid or delay calling 9–1-1 and cite fear of police involvement as a main reason. In 2017, the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act (GSDOA) was enacted by the Canadian government to provide people present at an overdose with legal protection from charges for simple drug possession, and conditions stemming from simple possession. Few studies have taken a multi-methods approach to evaluating the GSDOA. We used quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to explore awareness, understanding, and perceptions of the GSDOA in people at risk of witnessing an overdose. Methods Quantitative cross-sectional surveys and qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with adults and youth at risk of witnessing an overdose across British Columbia. Cross-sectional survey participants were recruited at 19 Take Home Naloxone sites and online through Foundry. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed hierarchically to determine factors associated with GSDOA awareness. Telephone interview participants were recruited by research assistants with lived/living experience of substance use. Deductive and inductive thematic analyses were conducted to identify major themes. Results Overall, 52.7% (n = 296) of the quantitative study sample (N = 453) reported being aware of the GSDOA. In multivariable analysis, cellphone possession (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36, 3.54) and having recently witnessed an opioid overdose (AOR = 2.34; 95% CI 1.45, 3.80) were positively associated with GSDOA awareness. Young adults (25 – 34 years) were more likely to be aware of the Act (AOR = 2.10; 95% CI 1.11, 3.98) compared to youth (16–24 years). Qualitative interviews (N = 42) revealed that many overestimated the protections offered by the GSDOA. To increase awareness and knowledge of the Act among youth, participants recommended adding the GSDOA to school curricula and using social media. Word of mouth was suggested to reach adults. Conclusion Both awareness and knowledge of the GSDOA remain low in BC, with many overestimating the protections the Act offers. Dissemination efforts should be led by people with lived/living experience and should target those with limited awareness and understanding of the Act as misunderstandings can erode trust in law enforcement and harm reduction policy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13011-022-00472-4.
Collapse
|
9
|
Intention to seek emergency medical services during community overdose events in British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:56. [PMID: 35883186 PMCID: PMC9315848 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00484-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Canada and the United States continue to experience increasing overdose deaths attributed to highly toxic illicit substances, driven by fentanyl and its analogues. Many bystanders report being hesitant to call 9-1-1 at an overdose due to fears around police presence and arrests. In Canada, a federal law was enacted in 2017, the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act (GSDOA), to provide protection from simple drug possession and related charges when 9-1-1 is called to an overdose. There is limited evidence, however, that the GSDOA has improved rates of intention to call 9-1-1 at overdose events. We therefore sought to examine intent to call 9-1-1 among persons who received GSDOA education and were at risk of witnessing an overdose. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted with people at risk of witnessing an overdose recruited at 19 Take Home Naloxone (THN) program sites across British Columbia as well as online through Foundry from October 2020 to April 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to examine intention to call 9-1-1 at future overdoses. Multivariable logistic regression models were built in hierarchical fashion to examine factors associated with intention to call 9-1-1. Results Overall, 89.6% (n = 404) of the eligible sample reported intention to call 9-1-1. In the multivariable model, factors positively associated with intention to call 9-1-1 included identifying as a cisgender woman (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.37; 95% CI: 1.19–9.50) and having previous GSDOA awareness ([AOR]: 4.16; 95% CI: 1.62–10.70). Having experienced a stimulant overdose in the past 6 months was negatively associated with intention to call 9-1-1 ([AOR]: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09–0.65). Conclusion A small proportion of the respondents reported that, despite the enactment of GSDOA, they did not intend to call 9-1-1 and those who were aware of the act were more likely to report an intention to call at future overdose events. Increasing GSDOA awareness and/or additional interventions to support the aims of the GSDOA could address ongoing reluctance to seek emergency medical care by people who use drugs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13011-022-00484-0.
Collapse
|
10
|
Graham E, Zhao B, Flynn M, Gustafson P, Irvine MA, Slaunwhite A, Orpana H, Kuo M, MacDougall L. Using linked data to identify pathways of reporting overdose events in British Columbia, 2015-2017. Int J Popul Data Sci 2022; 7:1708. [PMID: 37650030 PMCID: PMC10464869 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i1.1708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Overdose events related to illicit opioids and other substances are a public health crisis in Canada. The BC Provincial Overdose Cohort is a collection of linked datasets identifying drug-related toxicity events, including death, ambulance, emergency room, hospital, and physician records. The datasets were brought together to understand factors associated with drug-related overdose and can also provide information on pathways of care among people who experience an overdose. Objectives To describe pathways of recorded healthcare use for overdose events in British Columbia, Canada and discrepancies between data sources. Methods Using the BC Provincial Overdose Cohort spanning 2015 to 2017, we examined pathways of recorded health care use for overdose through the framework of an injury reporting pyramid. We also explored differences in event capture between linked datasets. Results In the cohort, a total of 34,113 fatal and non-fatal overdose events were identified. A total of 3,056 people died of overdose. Nearly 80% of these deaths occurred among those with no contact with the healthcare system. The majority of events with healthcare records included contact with EHS services (72%), while 39% were seen in the ED and only 7% were hospitalized. Pathways of care from EHS services to ED and hospitalization were generally observed. However, not all ED visits had an associated EHS record and some hospitalizations following an ED visit were for other health issues. Conclusions These findings emphasize the importance of accessing timely healthcare for people experiencing overdose. These findings can be applied to understanding pathways of care for people who experience overdose events and estimating the total burden of healthcare-attended overdose events. Highlights In British Columbia, Canada:Multiple sources of linked administrative health data were leveraged to understand recorded healthcare use among people with fatal and non-fatal overdose eventsThe majority of fatal overdose events occurred with no contact with the healthcare system and only appear in mortality dataMany non-fatal overdose events were captured in data from emergency health services, emergency departments, and hospital recordsAccessing timely healthcare services is critical for people experiencing overdose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Graham
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada
| | - Bin Zhao
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control
| | - Mallory Flynn
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada
- Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia
| | - Paul Gustafson
- Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia
| | | | - Amanda Slaunwhite
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control
- School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia
| | - Heather Orpana
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa
| | - Margot Kuo
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada
| | - Laura MacDougall
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferguson M, Medley A, Rittenbach K, Brothers TD, Strike C, Ng J, Leece P, Elton-Marshall T, Ali F, Lorenzetti DL, Buxton JA. Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:71. [PMID: 35780136 PMCID: PMC9250272 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Take-Home Naloxone (THN) is a core intervention aimed at addressing the toxic illicit opioid drug supply crisis. Although THN programs are available in all provinces and territories throughout Canada, there are currently no standardized guidelines for THN programs. The Delphi method is a tool for consensus building often used in policy development that allows for engagement of stakeholders. METHODS We used an adapted anonymous online Delphi method to elicit priorities for a Canadian guideline on THN as a means of facilitating meaningful stakeholder engagement. A guideline development group generated a series of key questions that were then brought to a 15-member voting panel. The voting panel was comprised of people with lived and living experience of substance use, academics specializing in harm reduction, and clinicians and public health professionals from across Canada. Two rounds of voting were undertaken to score questions on importance for inclusion in the guideline. RESULTS Nine questions that were identified as most important include what equipment should be in THN kits, whether there are important differences between intramuscular and intranasal naloxone administration, how stigma impacts access to distribution programs, how effective THN programs are at saving lives, what distribution models are most effective and equitable, storage considerations for naloxone in a community setting, the role of CPR and rescue breathing in overdose response, client preference of naloxone distribution program type, and what aftercare should be provided for people who respond to overdoses. CONCLUSIONS The Delphi method is an equitable consensus building process that generated priorities to guide guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Ferguson
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Medley
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Katherine Rittenbach
- Alberta Health Services (AHS), Edmonton, AB, Canada.,University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Thomas D Brothers
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.,UCL Collaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carol Strike
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Justin Ng
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Pamela Leece
- Public Health Ontario (PHO), Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Elton-Marshall
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute of Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Farihah Ali
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Institute of Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jane A Buxton
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Selfridge M, Card K, Kandler T, Flanagan E, Lerhe E, Heaslip A, Nguyen A, Moher M, Pauly B, Urbanoski K, Fraser C. Factors associated with 60-day adherence to "safer supply" opioids prescribed under British Columbia's interim clinical guidance for health care providers to support people who use drugs during COVID-19 and the ongoing overdose emergency. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 105:103709. [PMID: 35525052 PMCID: PMC9065674 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
AIMS In March 2020, British Columbia issued Risk Mitigation Guidance (RMG) to support prescribing of pharmaceutical alternatives to illicit drugs, in order to reduce risk for COVID-19, overdose, and withdrawal among people who use drugs. This study evaluated factors associated with 60-day adherence to novel opioid alternatives prescribed at an inner-city health centre in Victoria, Canada. METHODS A chart review was conducted to collect data on sociodemographic information, medical histories, and follow-up services among all clients prescribed novel opioid alternatives from March 2020-August 2020 (n = 286). Bivariable and multivariable regression were used to identify independent and adjusted factors associated with 60-day adherence. RESULTS Overall, 77% of 286 clients were still receiving opioids after 60 days of follow-up. Medications included hydromorphone (n = 274), sustained-release oral morphine (n = 2), and oxycodone (n = 9). The adjusted odds of 60-day adherence to novel opioid alternatives were significantly higher for those receiving a mental health medication (aOR = 3.49, 95%CI = 1.26, 11.00), a higher maximum daily dosage of RMG prescriptions (aOR = 1.03 per mg increase, 95%CI = 1.01, 1.04), and those with continuous receipt of OAT (aOR = 6.25, 95%CI = 2.67, 15.90). CONCLUSIONS Higher dosages and co-prescription of mental health medications and OAT may help support better adherence to this form of prescriber-based "safer supply". Further work is needed to identify optimal prescribing practices and the longer term impacts of differing implementation scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Selfridge
- Cool Aid Community Health Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada; Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
| | - Kiffer Card
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada,Simon Fraser University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Canada
| | - Taylor Kandler
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Canada
| | - Erin Flanagan
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Canada
| | - Emily Lerhe
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Canada
| | - Ash Heaslip
- Cool Aid Community Health Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada,University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Canada
| | - Anne Nguyen
- Cool Aid Community Health Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada,University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Canada,University of Victoria, Faculty of Medicine, Canada
| | - Matthew Moher
- Cool Aid Community Health Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada,University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Canada,University of Victoria, Faculty of Medicine, Canada
| | - Bernie Pauly
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada,University of Victoria, School of Nursing, Canada
| | - Karen Urbanoski
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada,University of Victoria, School of Public Health and Social Policy, Canada
| | - Chris Fraser
- Cool Aid Community Health Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada,University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lei V, Ferguson M, Geiger R, Williams S, Liu L, Buxton JA. Factors associated with take-home naloxone kit usage in British Columbia: an analysis of administrative data. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:25. [PMID: 35361228 PMCID: PMC8968772 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00452-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The British Columbia (BC) Take-Home Naloxone (THN) program provides naloxone to people at risk of experiencing or witnessing an opioid overdose for use in reversing suspected overdose events. This study seeks to examine trends and correlates of individuals obtaining a THN kit in BC between 2017 and 2020. METHODS Records of THN kits distributed between 2017 and 2020 were the primary source of data for this analysis. Frequency tables were used to describe characteristics of people obtaining kits from THN sites. Correlates of individuals obtaining a THN kit to replace a previous kit reported as used to reverse an overdose were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, 240,606 THN kits were reported distributed by registered sites to members of the public, with 90,011 records indicating that a kit was obtained to replace a previous kit that had been used to reverse an overdose. There was a significant trend in increasing kits reported used by year (p < 0.01). The kit recipient's risk of overdose was a significant predictor of having reported using a THN kit, and the strength of the association was dependent on gender (Male: Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 5.37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.08 - 5.67]; Female: AOR 8.35 [95% CI 7.90 - 8.82]; Trans and gender expansive: AOR 3.68 [95% CI 2.82 - 4.79]). CONCLUSIONS Between 2017 and 2020, THN kits were used to reverse tens of thousands of overdose events in BC, with people at risk of overdose (i.e. people who use drugs [PWUD]) having greater odds of using a kit to reverse an overdose than those not at risk. Thus, PWUD are responsible for reversing the vast majority of overdoses. THN kits are being distributed to the people who use them most. However, additional strategies in conjunction with community-based naloxone distribution programs are needed to address the rising number of illicit drug toxicity deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Lei
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Max Ferguson
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rachael Geiger
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Lisa Liu
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jane A Buxton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martignetti L, Sun W. Perspectives of Stakeholders of Equitable Access to Community Naloxone Programs: A Literature Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e21461. [PMID: 35223245 PMCID: PMC8858082 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to examine the existing literature about facilitators and barriers influencing equitable access to naloxone programs by individuals who use opioids. A total of 49 published articles were examined, which generated four overarching themes:(1) Stigma as a barrier to access; (2) Lack of a wide range of stakeholder perspectives; (3) Need for a comprehensive understanding of factors affecting equitable access to naloxone programs; (4) Facilitators to increase the access of community naloxone programs. Our review highlighted the importance of advocacy in practice, education, administration, and policy to address the health inequities that exist in naloxone distribution programs. Advocacy activities involve the need for health care professionals to engage in social justice practice through evidence-based informed research about the facts of opioid use; challenging the stigma toward victim-blaming against naloxone users; as well as promoting program development and health policy to bring about equitable access to naloxone programs by marginalized and socially disadvantaged populations.
Collapse
|
15
|
Keen C, Kinner SA, Young JT, Jang K, Gan W, Samji H, Zhao B, Krausz M, Slaunwhite A. Prevalence of co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorder and association with overdose: a linked data cohort study among residents of British Columbia, Canada. Addiction 2022; 117:129-140. [PMID: 34033179 DOI: 10.1111/add.15580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To estimate the treated prevalence of mental illness, substance use disorder (SUD) and dual diagnosis and the association between dual diagnosis and fatal and non-fatal overdose among residents of British Columbia (BC), Canada. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study using linked health, income assistance, corrections and death records. SETTING British Columbia (BC), Canada. PARTICIPANTS A total of 921 346 BC residents (455 549 males and 465 797 females) aged 10 years and older. MEASUREMENTS Hospital and primary-care administrative data were used to identify a history of mental illness only, SUD only, dual diagnosis or no history of SUD or mental illness (2010-14) and overdoses resulting in medical care (2015-17). We calculated crude incidence rates of non-fatal and fatal overdose by dual diagnosis history. Andersen-Gill and competing risks regression were used to examine the association between dual diagnosis and non-fatal and fatal overdose, respectively, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, incarceration history, social assistance, history of prescription opioid and benzodiazepine dispensing and region of residence. FINDINGS Of the 921 346 people in the cohort, 176 780 (19.2%), 6147 (0.7%) and 15 269 (1.7%) had a history of mental illness only, SUD only and dual diagnosis, respectively; 4696 (0.5%) people experienced 688 fatal and 6938 non-fatal overdoses. In multivariable analyses, mental illness only, SUD only and dual diagnosis were associated with increased rate of non-fatal [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6-2.1; HR = 9.0, 95% CI = 7.0-11.5, HR = 8.7, 95% CI = 6.9-10.9, respectively] and fatal overdose (HR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.3-2.0, HR = 4.3, 95% CI = 2.8-6.5, HR = 4.1, 95% CI = 2.8-6.0, respectively) compared with no history. CONCLUSIONS In a large sample of residents of British Columbia (Canada), approximately one in five people had sought care for a substance use disorder or mental illness in the past 5 years. The rate of overdose was elevated in people with a mental illness alone, higher again in people with a substance use disorder alone and highest in people with a dual diagnosis. The adjusted hazard rates were similar for people with substance use disorder only and people with a dual diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Keen
- Justice Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stuart A Kinner
- Justice Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.,Justice Health Group, Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia.,Mater Research Institute-UQ, University of Queensland, Australia.,Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Jesse T Young
- Justice Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kerry Jang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Wenqi Gan
- Data and Analytic Services, BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hasina Samji
- Clinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bin Zhao
- Data and Analytic Services, BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael Krausz
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amanda Slaunwhite
- Clinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adverse events related to bystander naloxone administration in cases of suspected opioid overdose in British Columbia: An observational study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0259126. [PMID: 34714854 PMCID: PMC8555799 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Take-Home Naloxone programs have been introduced across North America in response to rising opioid overdose deaths. There is currently limited real-world data on bystander naloxone administration, overdose outcomes, and evidence related to adverse events following bystander naloxone administration. Methods The research team used descriptive statistics from Take-Home Naloxone administration forms. We explored reported demographic variables and adverse events among people who received by-stander administered naloxone in a suspected opioid overdose event between August 31, 2012 and December 31, 2018 in British Columbia. We examined and contextualized differences across years given policy, program and drug toxicity changes. We used multivariate logistic regression to examine whether an association exists between number of ampoules of naloxone administered and the odds that the recipient will experience withdrawal symptoms. Results A large majority (98.1%) of individuals who were administered naloxone survived their overdose and 69.2% had no or only mild withdrawal symptoms. Receiving three (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 1.64 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.08–2.48)) or four or more (AOR 2.19 (95% CI: 1.32–3.62)) ampoules of naloxone was significantly associated with odds of moderate or severe withdrawal compared to receiving one ampoule of naloxone. Conclusions This study provides evidence from thousands of bystander reversed opioid overdoses using Take-Home Naloxone kits in British Columbia, and suggests bystander-administered naloxone is safe and effective for opioid overdose reversal. Data suggests an emphasis on titration during bystander naloxone training in situations where the person experiencing overdose can be adequately ventilated may help avoid severe withdrawal symptoms. We identified a decreasing trend in the likelihood of moderate or severe withdrawal over the study period.
Collapse
|
17
|
Police officers' knowledge, understanding and implementation of the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act in BC, Canada. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 97:103410. [PMID: 34438275 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In May 2017, the Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act (GSDOA) was enacted in Canada - amending the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. For people present at an overdose, the GSDOA offers legal protection from simple drug possession as well as breach of charges related to simple possession including probation, pre-trial release, conditional sentences, and parole. It is unclear if the GSDOA has been fully implemented by police officers. METHODS We conducted 22 key informant interviews with police officers across British Columbia, Canada. Convenience sampling was initially employed, followed by purposeful sampling to ensure diversity in jurisdictions and participant demographics (e.g. age, sex, policing experience). A thematic analysis was conducted RESULTS: Our findings show that awareness and knowledge of the GSDOA vary among police officers. Many officers reported being unaware of the GSDOA or could not correctly define for whom and when the GSDOA applies. Information about the GSDOA was largely disseminated via email. Many officers expressed concerns with this dissemination method given the potential that key legal information would be overlooked. Police officers reported that not arresting for simple possession at an overdose was common practice, even before the enactment of the GSDOA. Thus, some officers did not believe that the GSDOA considerably changed police practices. Finally, police officers reported that they exercised discretion applying the GSDOA. Police officer interpretation of the intention and content of the GSDOA had critical implications for how they applied it in practice. CONCLUSION Effective education for law enforcement, including the dissemination of information beyond email, is needed to improve officers' awareness and understanding of the GSDOA. Given officers' use of discretion when applying the GSDOA, greater legal reforms, such as de jure decriminalization, may be required to fully protect persons at an overdose from simple possession for controlled substances.
Collapse
|
18
|
Williams S, King T, Papamihali K, Buxton JA. The implementation and role of a staff naloxone program for non-profit community-based sites in British Columbia: A descriptive study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251112. [PMID: 33983996 PMCID: PMC8118334 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The BC Centre for Disease Control implemented the Facility Overdose Response Box (FORB) program December 1st, 2016 to train and support non-healthcare service providers who may respond to an overdose in the workplace. The program aims to support staff at non-profit community-based organizations by ensuring policy development, training, practice overdose response exercises, and post-overdose debriefing opportunities are established and implemented. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three data sources were used in this descriptive cross-sectional study: FORB site registration data; naloxone administration forms; and a survey that was distributed to FORB sites in February 2019. FORB program site and naloxone administration data from December 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2019 were analyzed using descriptive statistics. A Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess trends over time in naloxone administration event characteristics. Site coordinator survey results are reported to supplement findings from administrative data. RESULTS As of December 31st, 2019, FORB was implemented at 613 sites across BC and 1,758 naloxone administration events were reported. The majority (86.3%, n = 1,517) were indicated as overdose reversals. At registration, 43.6% of sites provided housing services, 26.3% offered harm reduction supplies, and 18.6% provided Take Home Naloxone. Refusal to be transported to hospital following overdose events when emergency services were called showed an increasing trend over time. Most respondents (81.3%) reported feeling confident in their ability to respond to the overdose and 59.6% were offered staff debrief. Based on the 89 site survey responses, supports most commonly made available following an overdose were debrief with a fellow staff member (91.0%), debrief with a supervisor (89.9%), and/or counselling services (84.3%). CONCLUSIONS The uptake of the FORB program has contributed to hundreds of overdose reversals in community settings in BC. Findings suggest that the FORB program supports developing staff preparedness and confidence in overdose response in community-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sierra Williams
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tanis King
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Jane A. Buxton
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
“It's an emotional roller coaster… But sometimes it's fucking awesome”: Meaning and motivation of work for peers in overdose response environments in British Columbia. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 88:103015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
20
|
McLeod KE, Slaunwhite AK, Zhao B, Moe J, Purssell R, Gan W, Xavier C, Kuo M, Mill C, Buxton JA, Scheuermeyer FX. Comparing mortality and healthcare utilization in the year following a paramedic-attended non-fatal overdose among people who were and were not transported to hospital: A prospective cohort study using linked administrative health data. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 218:108381. [PMID: 33158663 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the overdose emergency continues in British Columbia (BC), paramedic-attended overdoses are increasing, as is the proportion of people not transported to hospital following an overdose. This study investigated risk of death and subsequent healthcare utilization for people who were and were not transported to hospital after a paramedic-attended non-fatal overdose. METHODS Using a linked administrative health data set which includes all overdoses that come into contact with health services in BC, we conducted a prospective cohort study of people who experienced a paramedic-attended non-fatal overdose between 2015 and 2016. People were followed for 365 days after the index event. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality and overdose-related death. Additionally, we examined healthcare utilization after the index event. RESULTS In this study, 8659 (84%) people were transported and 1644 (16%) were not transported to hospital at the index overdose event. There were 279 overdose deaths (2.7% of people, 59.4% of deaths) during follow-up. There was no significant difference in risk of overdose-related death, though people not transported had higher odds of a subsequent non-fatal overdose event captured in emergency department and outpatient records within 90 days. People transported to hospital had higher odds of using hospital and outpatient services for any reason within 365 days. CONCLUSIONS Transport to hospital after a non-fatal overdose is an opportunity to provide care for underlying and chronic conditions. There is a need to better understand factors that contribute to non-transport, particularly among people aged 20-59 and people without chronic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E McLeod
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| | - Amanda K Slaunwhite
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z4R4, Canada
| | - Bin Zhao
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Jessica Moe
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z4R4, Canada; Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Roy Purssell
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z4R4, Canada
| | - Wenqi Gan
- BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z4R4, Canada
| | - Chloé Xavier
- BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z4R4, Canada
| | - Margot Kuo
- BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z4R4, Canada
| | - Chris Mill
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Road A.L. 6501H, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Jane A Buxton
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; BC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z4R4, Canada
| | - Frank X Scheuermeyer
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; Providence Health Care, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tsuyuki RT, Arora V, Barnes M, Beazely MA, Boivin M, Christofides A, Patel H, Laroche J, Sihota A, So R. Canadian national consensus guidelines for naloxone prescribing by pharmacists. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2020; 153:347-351. [PMID: 33282024 PMCID: PMC7689616 DOI: 10.1177/1715163520949973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ross T Tsuyuki
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Vinita Arora
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Mark Barnes
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Michael A Beazely
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Michael Boivin
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Anna Christofides
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Harsit Patel
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Julie Laroche
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Aaron Sihota
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| | - Randy So
- University of Alberta (Tsuyuki, So), Edmonton, Alberta.,University of Toronto (Arora), Toronto.,RespectRx (Barnes), Ottawa.,University of Waterloo (Beazely), Waterloo.,CommPharm Consulting (Boivin), Barrie.,IMPACT Medicom Inc. (Christofides), Toronto.,Hamilton General Hospital (Patel), Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario.,Familiprix (Laroche), St-Lin-Laurentides, Quebec.,University of British Columbia (Sihota), Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Papamihali K, Yoon M, Graham B, Karamouzian M, Slaunwhite AK, Tsang V, Young S, Buxton JA. Convenience and comfort: reasons reported for using drugs alone among clients of harm reduction sites in British Columbia, Canada. Harm Reduct J 2020; 17:90. [PMID: 33228676 PMCID: PMC7682134 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-020-00436-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background North American communities are severely impacted by the overdose crisis, particularly in British Columbia (BC), which has the highest toxic drug overdose death rate in Canada. Most fatal overdoses in BC occurred among individuals using alone and in private residences. This study aimed to assess prevalence and reasons for using drugs alone among people accessing harm reduction services in BC. Methods We recruited harm reduction supply distribution site clients from 22 communities across BC. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used to describe factors associated with using alone. Thematic analysis of free-text responses providing reasons for using alone were grouped with survey data and additional themes identified. Results Overall, 75.8% (n = 314) of the study sample (N = 414) reported using drugs alone within the last week. Those that reported using alone did not differ from those that did not by gender, age, urbanicity, or preferred drug use method. Among those that used alone, 73.2% (n = 230) used opioids, 76.8% (n = 241) used crystal meth, 41.4% (n = 130) used crack/cocaine, and 44.6% (n = 140) used alcohol in the past week. Polysubstance use involving stimulants, opioids, and/or benzodiazepines was reported by 68.5% (n = 215) of those that used alone. Additionally, 22.9% (n = 72) of those that used alone had experienced an opioid and/or stimulant overdose in the past 6 months. In a multivariable logistic regression model, having no regular housing and past week crack/cocaine use were associated with using alone (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.27; 95% CI 1.20–4.27 and AOR: 2.10; 95% CI 1.15–3.82, respectively). The most common reason reported for using alone was convenience and comfort of using alone (44.3%). Additional reasons included: stigma/hiding drug use (14.0%); having no one around (11.7%); safety (9.6%); and not wanting to share drugs with others (8.6%). Conclusions Using drugs alone, particularly for convenience and comfort, is ubiquitous among people accessing harm reduction services. Overdose prevention measures that go beyond individual behaviour changes, including providing a safer supply of drugs and eliminating stigma, are paramount to mitigate harms. These interventions are especially necessary as emergence of coronavirus disease may further exacerbate unpredictability of illicit drug content and overdose risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristi Papamihali
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada
| | - Minha Yoon
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Brittany Graham
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada
| | - Mohammad Karamouzian
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.,British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.,HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Amanda K Slaunwhite
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Vivian Tsang
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 317 - 2194 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Sara Young
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada
| | - Jane A Buxton
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada. .,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 E Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Moustaqim-Barrette A, Papamihali K, Mamdani Z, Williams S, Buxton JA. Accessing Take-Home Naloxone in British Columbia and the role of community pharmacies: Results from the analysis of administrative data. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238618. [PMID: 32915834 PMCID: PMC7485887 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION British Columbia's (BC) Take-Home Naloxone (THN) program provides naloxone to bystanders for use in cases of suspected opioid overdose. This study seeks to provide trends and analysis from the provincial BC THN program since inception in 2012 to the end of 2018. MATERIALS AND METHODS BC THN shipment and distribution records from 2012-2018 were retrieved. Frequency distributions were used to describe characteristics of individuals accessing the program. To evaluate correlates of distribution after the addition of hundreds of pharmacy distribution sites, an analytic sample was limited to records from 2018, and multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate correlates of collecting naloxone at a pharmacy site. RESULTS Since program inception to the end of 2018, there were 398,167 naloxone kits shipped to distribution sites, 149,999 kits reported distributed, and 40,903 kits reported used to reverse an overdose in BC. There was a significant increasing trend in the number of naloxone kits used to reverse an overdose over time (p<0.01), and more than 90% of kits that were reported used were distributed to persons at risk of an overdose. Individuals not personally at risk of overdose had higher odds of collecting naloxone at a pharmacy site, compared to other community sites (including harm reduction supply distribution sites, peer led organizations, drop-in centers, and supportive housing sites) (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 2.69; 95% CI: 2.50-2.90). CONCLUSIONS This study documents thousands of opioid overdose reversals facilitated through the BC THN program. While those at highest risk of overdose may preferentially access naloxone through community sites, naloxone distribution through pharmacies has allowed the BC THN program to expand dramatically, increasing naloxone availability through longer opening hours on evenings and weekends. and in rural and remote regions. A diversity of naloxone distribution sites and strategies is crucial to prevent rising opioid overdose deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Zahra Mamdani
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Jane A. Buxton
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jones JD, Campbell AN, Brandt L, Castillo F, Abbott R, Comer SD. Intervention in an opioid overdose event increases interest in treatment among individuals with opioid use disorder. Subst Abus 2020; 42:407-411. [PMID: 32814002 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1809607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to explore whether intervening in suspected cases of opioid overdose alters interest in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Data were collected as a part of a trial comparing the effects of different overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) training curricula on overdose outcomes. Methods: Following OEND training, participants completed four in-person follow-up visits at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-months. Participants were also regularly contacted to inquire about overdose events they responded to, witnessed, or experienced themselves. Other assessments included the Addiction Severity Index that queries participants' perceived importance of drug treatment on a scale of: 0 (Not at All) to 4 (Extremely). For the current secondary data analysis, treatment importance was assessed at the time points most immediately preceding and following participant intervention in an overdose event using naloxone. Results: The sample reported a mean duration of opioid use of 14.9 (± 11.5) years, with 67% having witnessed an overdose event prior to the study. Of the 321 enrolled, 92 participants used naloxone in response to 166 suspected cases of an opioid overdose. For the entire sample, mean treatment importance did not significantly change throughout the study. Among participants who utilized naloxone, treatment importance increased following the event (Before: 3.03, After: 3.39, p = 0.02). Due to the amount of time between the overdose event and assessment of post-event treatment importance (40.5 days, ±40.2), the current study most likely underestimates this effect. Conclusions: The current study suggests that responding to an overdose event increases interest in OUD treatment. Currently only considered an acute intervention to reduce overdose morbidity and mortality, OEND may have the potential to increase enrollment in medications to treat OUD. However, a prospective investigation needs to determine if the impact of an overdose event could be utilized to increase treatment engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jermaine D Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aimee N Campbell
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Laura Brandt
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Felipe Castillo
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca Abbott
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sandra D Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Known fentanyl use among clients of harm reduction sites in British Columbia, Canada. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 77:102665. [PMID: 31962283 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND North America is in the midst of an opioid overdose epidemic and it is commonly suggested that exposure to fentanyl is unknown. Using a provincial survey of harm reduction site clients, we aimed to characterize known and unknown fentanyl use and their correlates among people who use drugs in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS We recruited 486 clients who were >18 years old and 316 agreed to provide a urine sample for substance use testing. Reported known fentanyl use was defined as a three-level categorical variable assessing recent (i.e., in the previous three days) fentanyl exposure: (i) known exposure; (ii) unknown exposure; and (iii) no exposure. We also assessed any exposure to fentanyl (Yes vs. No) confirmed by urinalysis. Survey data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Multinomial logistic regression and modified Poisson regression models were built to examine different correlates of exposure to fentanyl. RESULTS Median age of the participants was 40 (IQR: 32-49). Out of the 303 eligible participants, 38.7% (117) reported known fentanyl use, 21.7% (66) had unknown fentanyl use, and 39.6% (120) had no recent fentanyl use. In the adjusted multinomial logistic regression model and in comparison with unknown fentanyl use, recent known fentanyl use was significantly associated with self-report of methadone use (aRRR = 3.18), heroin/morphine use (aRRR = 4.40), and crystal meth use (aRRR = 2.95). Moreover, any recent exposure to fentanyl (i.e., positive urine test for fentanyl) was significantly associated with living in urban settings (aPR = 1.49), and self-reporting recent cannabis use (aPR = 0.73), crystal meth (aPR = 1.45), and heroin/morphine use (aPR = 2.48). CONCLUSION The landscape of illicit opioid use is changing in BC and more people are using fentanyl knowingly. The increasing prevalence of known fentanyl use is concerning and calls for further investments in public awareness and public policy efforts regarding fentanyl exposure and risks.
Collapse
|