Young people's perceptions of accessing a community pharmacy for a chlamydia testing kit: a qualitative study based in North East England

Access to primary care for children and young people (CYP) in the UK: a scoping review of CYP's, caregivers' and healthcare professionals' views and experiences of facilitators and barriers

OBJECTIVES

To examine children and young people's (CYP), caregivers' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) views or experiences of facilitators and barriers to CYP access to UK primary care services to better understand healthcare inequity. To explore differences across CYP subpopulations with greater health needs from deprived areas, identifying as ethnic minorities, with experiences of state care, special educational needs or disabilities, chronic conditions or mental health problems.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Included studies were in English, published 2012-2022 and reported: the views/experiences of CYP (0-25 years), caregivers or HCPs about accessing UK primary care; using quantitative or qualitative empirical methods.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Scopus.

RESULTS

We included 47 reports (46 studies). CYP/caregivers' decision to access care was facilitated by CYP/caregivers' or their family/friends' ability to identify a health issue as warranting healthcare attention. Barriers to accessing care included perceived stigma (eg, being seen as a bad parent), embarrassment and discrimination experiences. CYP and caregivers believed longer opening hours could facilitate more timely access to care. Caregivers and HCPs reported that delayed or rejected referrals to secondary or adult care were a barrier to having needs met, especially for CYP with poor mental health. CYP and caregivers in numerous studies emphasised the importance of communication and trust with HCPs, including taking their concerns seriously, being knowledgeable and providing continuity of care for CYP. Common barriers reported across high-need subpopulations were caregivers needing knowledge and confidence to advocate for their child, gaps in HCP's knowledge and a lack of connectedness between primary and secondary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Connecting general practices and community health workers/services, improving CYP/caregivers' understanding of common childhood conditions, addressing HCP's knowledge gaps in paediatric care and integrated approaches between primary and secondary care may reduce inequity in access.

Exploring young people's attitudes to HIV prevention medication (PrEP) in England: a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Young people aged 18-24 years old are a key demographic target for eliminating HIV transmission globally. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a prevention medication, reduces HIV transmission. Despite good uptake by gay and bisexual men who have sex with men, hesitancy to use PrEP has been observed in other groups, such as young people and people from ethnic minority backgrounds. The aim of this study was to explore young people's perceptions and attitudes to using PrEP.

DESIGN

A qualitative transcendental phenomenological design was used.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

A convenience sample of 24 young people aged between 18 and 24 years was recruited from England.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews and graphical elicitation were used to collect data including questions about current experiences of HIV care, awareness of using PrEP and decision-making about accessing PrEP. Thematic and visual analyses were used to identify findings.

RESULTS

Young people had good levels of knowledge about HIV but poor understanding of using PrEP. In this information vacuum, negative stigma and stereotypes about HIV and homosexuality were transferred to using PrEP, which were reinforced by cultural norms portrayed on social media, television and film-such as an association between using PrEP and being a promiscuous, white, gay male. In addition, young people from ethnic minority communities appeared to have negative attitudes to PrEP use, compared with ethnic majority counterparts. This meant these young people in our study were unable to make decisions about when and how to use PrEP.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate an information vacuum for young people regarding PrEP. A strength of the study is that theoretical data saturation was reached. A limitation of the study is participants were largely from Northern England, which has low prevalence of HIV. Further work is required to explore the information needs of young people in relation to PrEP.

Pharmacy-based sexually transmitted infection service implementation considerations: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are rising despite significant management efforts in traditional healthcare settings. The growing number of individuals affected by STIs demonstrates a gap in care. Pharmacy-based STI clinical services are a potential solution to improve care.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and summarize research about the implementation of pharmacy-based STI services, focusing on program characteristics, barriers, facilitators, and pharmacist and patient experiences.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted for papers evaluating STI expanded-scope clinical services performed by regulated pharmacists in an outpatient/community pharmacy setting. Study setting, design, data collection method, outcomes, target infection, services offered, patient population, and barriers and facilitators are reported.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, 11 cross-sectional and 1 randomized control trial, were identified in this review. All studies focused on chlamydia, and two included gonorrhea and trichomoniasis or syphilis. Eleven services investigated STI screening, with four also offering treatment, and two offering partner treatment. Overall, patients reported positive experiences, found the services accessible, and trusted pharmacists. Pharmacists recognized the importance of STI services, were keen, and felt comfortable performing clinical tasks. Patients described convenience as a key facilitator, and concerns about privacy, particularly at the pharmacy counter, and the stigma and fear of judgement associated with STIs as primary barriers. For facilitators, pharmacists reported increased job satisfaction and a sense of relieving the burden on traditional STI services; for barriers, pharmacists highlighted patient recruitment, communication challenges, and lack of remuneration.

CONCLUSION

Research on pharmacy-based STI services includes predominately small-scale, cross-sectional studies, and focuses on chlamydia screening. Both patients and pharmacists perceive these services to be acceptable and feasible, though strategies addressing patient privacy and recruitment, pharmacist competency, training, and remuneration must be considered to support the success of pharmacy-based STI services.

Investigating community pharmacists' perceptions of delivering chlamydia screening to young people: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory to understand professional practice

OBJECTIVES

Some community pharmacies in England provide free chlamydia testing to young people, yet testing activity in the setting is low. This study aims to increase understanding of why that is, by investigating community pharmacists' perceptions of barriers to delivering the service, and the reasons why some do not offer testing.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 community pharmacists in North East England between November 2018 and May 2019. The sample comprised both those who provided and did not provide chlamydia testing at the time of the interview. Data were subjected to thematic analysis, utilising the constructs of the normalisation process theory.

KEY FINDINGS

Pharmacists found it challenging to sustain delivery of chlamydia testing, as very few young people either requested the test or accepted it when it was offered during consultations on other sexual health services. Pharmacists were cautious about offering the test, having concerns about making clients feel uncomfortable. They identified the value of training to enable them to communicate confidently with clients about testing. Pharmacists supported the suggestion that treatment for chlamydia be offered as part of a 'test and treat' package, as they felt that it aligned to their role in the provision of medicines advice.

CONCLUSIONS

Community pharmacies are well-placed to deliver chlamydia testing but are not operating as effectively as they might do. The provision of training on communicating with young people, integrating testing with more sexual health services, and providing 'test and treatment' for chlamydia could contribute to greater testing activity.