1
|
Machín-Martín E, González-de la Torre H, Bordón-Reyes H, Jeppesen-Gutiérrez J, Martín-Martínez A. Cultural adaptation, validation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0 in the Spanish context. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:207. [PMID: 38504191 PMCID: PMC10949694 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06400-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several instruments have been designed to assess the childbirth experience. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) is one of the most widely used tools. There is an improved version of this instrument, the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0), which has not been adapted or validated for use in Spain. The aim of present study is to adapt the CEQ 2.0 to the Spanish context and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS This research was carried out in 2 stages. In the first stage, a methodological study was carried out in which the instrument was translated and back-translated, content validity was assessed by 10 experts (by calculating Aiken's V coefficient) and face validity was assessed in a sample of 30 postpartum women. In the second stage, a cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate construct validity by using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability evaluation (internal consistency and temporal stability) and validation by known groups. RESULTS In Stage 1, a Spanish version of the CEQ 2.0 (CEQ-E 2.0) was obtained with adequate face and content validity, with Aiken V scores greater than 0.70 for all items. A final sample of 500 women participated in Stage 2 of the study. The fit values for the obtained four-domain model were RMSEA = 0.038 [95% CI: 0.038-0.042], CFI = 0.989 [95% CI: 0.984-0.991], and GFI = 0.990 [95% CI: 0.982-0.991]. The overall Omega and Cronbach's Alpha coefficients were 0.872 [95% CI: 0.850-0.891] and 0.870 [95% CI: 0.849-0.890] respectively. A coefficient of intraclass correlation of 0.824 [95% CI: 0.314-0.936] (p ≤ 0.001) and a concordance coefficient of 0.694 [95% CI: 0.523-0.811] were obtained. CONCLUSIONS The Spanish version of CEQ 2.0 (CEQ-E 2.0), has adequate psychometric properties and is a valid, useful, and reliable instrument for assessing the childbirth experience in Spanish women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Machín-Martín
- University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio Ciencias de La Salud, C/Blas Cabrera Felipe S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria-Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
| | - Héctor González-de la Torre
- Research Support Unit of Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria, Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain.
- Department of Nursing, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio Ciencias de La Salud, C/Blas Cabrera Felipe S/N, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, 35016, Spain.
| | - Haridian Bordón-Reyes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria-Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
| | - Julia Jeppesen-Gutiérrez
- Multiprofessional Teaching Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the University Hospital Complex Insular Materno-Infantil of Gran Canaria, Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N. CP:35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria-Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Alicia Martín-Martínez
- University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Edificio Ciencias de La Salud, C/Blas Cabrera Felipe S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex of Gran Canaria-Canary Health Service, Avda Marítima del Sur S/N, 35016, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, CP, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geremia S, Valente EP, Mariani I, Dalena P, Lazzerini M. Women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: A co-occurrence network analysis. J Glob Health 2023; 13:06013. [PMID: 37144478 PMCID: PMC10161149 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.13.06013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recent evidence revealed significant gaps in the quality of maternal and newborn care in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region (EUR) countries. Collecting and analyzing women's views on their needs and priorities is crucial for developing actions to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care. With this study from the IMAgiNE EURO Project, we aimed to add to previous quantitative studies by analysing emerging themes from women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care during facility-based birth in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We collected data from mothers giving birth during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic using a validated online anonymous WHO standard-based questionnaire consisting of open-ended questions. Using a word co-occurrence network (WCON), we analysed responses in Italian from women who gave birth between March 2020 and March 2022. This approach entails a graphical representation of word pairings that frequently co-occur across sentences and compose clusters. Results The texts, produced by 2010 women participating in the study, consisted of 79 204 words and 3833 sentences. Eight clusters emerged with WCON, the three largest of which were related to companionship during childbirth, breastfeeding support, and physical resources. The term "swab", associated with other terms in the COVID-19 domain, had the highest degree of centrality, thus representing a core topic. Conclusions The key emerging themes from women's suggestions can be used to shape policies to improve the quality of care for mothers and newborns. Our WCON analysis offers a valid approach to quickly screen large textual data on quality of care, providing a first set of major themes identified by clusters. As such, it could be used to improve documentation of service users' suggestions promoting the engagement of both researchers and policymakers. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04847336.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Rozée V, Costa R, Otelea MR, Abderhalden-Zellweger A, Węgrzynowska M, Linden K, Arendt M, Brigidi S, Miani C, Pumpure E, Radetic J, Drandic D, Cerimagic A, Nedberg IH, Liepinaitienė A, Rodrigues C, de Labrusse C, Baranowska B, Zaigham M, Castañeda LM, Batram-Zantvoort S, Jakovicka D, Ruzicic J, Juciūtė S, Santos T, Gemperle M, Tataj-Puzyna U, Elden H, Mizgaitienė M, Lincetto O, Sacks E, Mariani I. Rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean and quality of maternal and newborn health care in private versus public facilities: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 16 countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:22-38. [PMID: 36530007 PMCID: PMC10108180 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic by facility type among 16 European countries, comparing rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean. METHODS Women who gave birth in the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020, to February 7, 2022, answered a validated online questionnaire. Rates of instrumental birth, instrumental vaginal birth, and cesarean, and a QMNC index were calculated for births in public versus private facilities. RESULTS Responses from 25 206 participants were analyzed. Women giving birth in private compared with public facilities reported significantly more frequent total cesarean (32.5% vs 19.0%; aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.52-1.90), elective cesarean (17.3% vs 7.8%; aOR 1.90; 95% CI 1.65-2.19), and emergency cesarean before labor (7.4% vs 3.9%; aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14-1.70) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons), with analyses by country confirming these results. QMNC index results were heterogeneous across countries and regions in the same country and were largely affected by geographical distribution of regions rather than by type of facility alone. CONCLUSION The study confirms that births in private facilities have higher odds of cesarean. It also suggests that QMNC should be closely monitored in all facilities to achieve high-quality care, independent of facility type or geographical distribution. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | - Raquel Costa
- Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal.,Lusófona University/HEI-Lab: Digital Human-environment Interaction Labs, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.,SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maria Węgrzynowska
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional Association of Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work, Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC), Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Elizabete Pumpure
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Rīga, Latvia.,Riga Maternity Hospital, Rīga, Latvia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carina Rodrigues
- Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
| | - Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Baranowska
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | | | - Simona Juciūtė
- Kaunas University of Applied Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade Europeia, Lisbon, Portugal.,Plataforma CatólicaMed/Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michael Gemperle
- Research Institute of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Urszula Tataj-Puzyna
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marija Mizgaitienė
- Kaunas Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ornella Lincetto
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arendt M, Tasch B, Conway F, Lecomte A, Covi B, Mariani I, Valente EP, Lazzerini M. Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth in Luxembourg during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:113-125. [PMID: 36530011 PMCID: PMC9877667 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during childbirth in Luxembourg from women's perspectives. METHODS Women giving birth in facilities in Luxembourg between March 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021, answered a validated online WHO standards-based questionnaire as part of the multicountry IMAgINE EURO study. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 493 women were included, representing 5.2% of women giving birth in the four maternity hospitals in Luxembourg during the study period. Most quality measures suggested high QMNC, although specific gaps were observed: 13.4% (n = 66) of women reported not being treated with dignity, 9.1% (n = 45) experienced abuse, 42.9% (n = 30) were not asked for consent prior to instrumental vaginal birth, 39.3% (n = 118) could not choose their birth position, 27% (n = 133) did not exclusively breastfeed at discharge (without significant differences over time), 20.5% (n = 101) reported an insufficient number of healthcare professionals, 20% (n = 25) did not receive information on the newborn after cesarean, and 41.2% (n = 203) reported lack of information on newborn danger signs before discharge. Multivariate analyses highlighted higher reported QMNC indexes among women born outside Luxembourg and delivering with a gynecologist, and significantly lower QMNC indexes in women with the highest education levels and those delivering in the hospital offering some private services. CONCLUSIONS Despite maternal reports suggesting an overall high QMNC in Luxembourg, improvements are needed in specific aspects of care and communication, mostly related to maternal autonomy, respect, and support, but also number and competencies of the health workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asblLuxembourgLuxembourg
| | - Barbara Tasch
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asblLuxembourgLuxembourg,Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, KannerKlinik, Centre Hospitalier de LuxembourgLuxembourgLuxembourg
| | - Francesca Conway
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Aline Lecomte
- Luxembourg Institute of Health, Department of Population Health/Public Health ExpertiseLuxembourgLuxembourg
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lazzerini M, Costa R, Mariani I, Vik ES, Elden H, Linden K, Zaigham M, Liepinaitienė A, Arendt M, Drglin Z, Sacks E, Lincetto O, Valente EP. Science and beyond science in the reporting of quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic—Authors’ reply. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022; 20:100488. [PMID: 35996590 PMCID: PMC9386305 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
- Corresponding author.
| | - Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal (FCT; UIDB/04750/2020)
- Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Lusófona University/HEI-Lab: Digital Human-environment Interaction Labs, Portugal (FCT; UIDB/05380/2020)
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of health and caring sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Vastra Gotaland, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Maryse Arendt
- BLL - Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl, Luxembourg Luxembourg
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ornella Lincetto
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|