1
|
Vik ES, Kongslien S, Nedberg IH, Mariani I, Valente EP, Covi B, Lazzerini M. Women's experiences and views on early breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: quantitative and qualitative findings from the IMAgiNE EURO study. Int Breastfeed J 2023; 18:15. [PMID: 36895002 PMCID: PMC9998246 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-023-00553-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about women's experience of care and views on early breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway. METHODS Women (n = 2922) who gave birth in a facility in Norway between March 2020 and June 2021 were invited to answer an online questionnaire based on World Health Organization (WHO) Standard-based quality measures, exploring their experiences of care and views on early breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic. To examine associations between year of birth (2020, 2021) and early breastfeeding-related factors, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multiple logistic regression. Qualitative data were analysed using Systematic Text Condensation. RESULTS Compared to the first year of the pandemic (2020), women who gave birth in 2021 reported higher odds of experiencing adequate breastfeeding support (adjOR 1.79; 95% CI 1.35, 2.38), immediate attention from healthcare providers when needed (adjOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.49, 2.39), clear communication from healthcare providers (adjOR 1.76; 95% CI 1.39, 2.22), being allowed companion of choice (adjOR 1.47; 95% CI 1.21, 1.79), adequate visiting hours for partner (adjOR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09, 1.68), adequate number of healthcare providers (adjOR 1.24; 95% CI 1.02, 1.52), and adequate professionalism of the healthcare providers (adjOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.32, 2.08). Compared to 2020, in 2021 we found no difference in skin-to-skin contact, early breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding at discharge, adequate number of women per room, or women's satisfaction. In their comments, women described understaffed postnatal wards, early discharge and highlighted the importance of breastfeeding support, and concerns about long-term consequences such as postpartum depression. CONCLUSIONS In the second year of the pandemic, WHO Standard-based quality measures related to breastfeeding improved for women giving birth in Norway compared to the first year of the pandemic. Women's general satisfaction with care during COVID-19 did however not improve significantly from 2020 to 2021. Compared to pre-pandemic data, our findings suggest an initial decrease in exclusive breastfeeding at discharge during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway with little difference comparing 2020 versus 2021. Our findings should alert researchers, policy makers and clinicians in postnatal care services to improve future practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Sigrun Kongslien
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Batram-Zantvoort S, Alaze A, Lazzerini M, Pessa Valente E, Mariani I, Covi B, Miani C. [Violated birth integrity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: experiences of women with maternity care]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2023; 66:302-311. [PMID: 36752819 PMCID: PMC9906577 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-023-03667-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic may increase women's vulnerability through violations of their integrity during birth. In a cross-sectional study (March 2020 to March 2022), we investigated how women giving birth experienced maternity care during the pandemic in Germany and which factors were associated with their birth integrity. METHODS In a survey (validated questionnaire and two open-ended questions), women ≥ 18 years described their experiences of maternity care. We conducted quantitative analyses using descriptive statistics and logistic regressions to investigate factors associated with dignified care and emotional support, which are understood as proxies of birth integrity. We analysed the open-ended questions through inductive content analysis. RESULTS We included data from 1271 participants and 214 comments. The majority of respondents felt emotionally supported (71%) and treated with dignity (76%). One third reported not always being involved in decision-making, while 14% felt they were subjected to physical, verbal or emotional abuse. For 57% of women, their companion of choice was absent or their presence limited. Those factors were all associated with the chances of feeling treated with dignity and emotionally supported. The qualitative comments provided an insight into what specifically women perceive as violating their integrity. DISCUSSION During the COVID-19 pandemic, the vulnerability of parturients lies in the violation of their birth integrity. Measures to promote respectful maternity care of women who give birth include comprehensive structural and political solutions as well as further research on the determinants of birth integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- AG Epidemiologie und International Public Health, Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, Universität Str. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Deutschland
| | - Anita Alaze
- AG Epidemiologie und International Public Health, Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, Universität Str. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Deutschland
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italien
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italien
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italien
| | - Benedetta Covi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italien
| | - Céline Miani
- AG Epidemiologie und International Public Health, Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, Universität Str. 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Deutschland. .,Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Aubervilliers, Frankreich.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chertok IA, Artzi-Medvedik R, Arendt M, Sacks E, Otelea MR, Rodrigues C, Costa R, Linden K, Zaigham M, Elden H, Drandic D, Grylka-Baeschlin S, Miani C, Valente EP, Covi B, Lazzerini M, Mariani I. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding at discharge during the COVID-19 pandemic in 17 WHO European Region countries. Int Breastfeed J 2022; 17:83. [PMID: 36461061 PMCID: PMC9716162 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-022-00517-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exclusive breastfeeding is the optimal infant nutrition, providing infants immunoprotection against many diseases including SARS-CoV-2 infection. Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic may have negatively affected breastfeeding practices in maternity care facilities. The aims of the study were to examine exclusive breastfeeding rates at discharge over time and to identify factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding during the pandemic. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted among mothers who gave birth in a maternity care facility in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The socio-ecological model was employed to examine intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, and community/society factors associated with maternal report of exclusive breastfeeding at the time of discharge. RESULTS There were 26,709 participating mothers from 17 European Region countries who were included in the analysis. Among the mothers, 72.4% (n = 19,350) exclusively breastfed and 27.6% (n = 7,359) did not exclusively breastfeed at discharge. There was an overall decline in exclusive breastfeeding rates over time (p = 0.015) with a significantly lower rate following the publication of the WHO breastfeeding guidelines on 23 June 2020 (AOR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82, 0.94). Factors significantly associated with exclusive breastfeeding outcomes in the logistic regression analysis included maternal age, parity, education, health insurance, mode of birth, inadequate breastfeeding support, lack of early breastfeeding initiation, lack of full rooming-in, birth attendant, perceived healthcare professionalism and attention, facility room cleanliness, timing of birth, and location of birth. CONCLUSIONS Results from the study indicate the decline in exclusive breastfeeding rates in the WHO European Region during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using the socio-ecological model to identify factors associated with breastfeeding outcomes facilitates an integrated and holistic approach to address breastfeeding needs among women across the region. These findings demonstrate the need to augment breastfeeding support and to protect exclusive breastfeeding among mother-infant dyads, in an effort to reverse the declining exclusive breastfeeding rates. The study highlights the need to educate mothers and their families about the importance of exclusive breastfeeding, reduce maternal-infant separation, increase professional breastfeeding support, and follow evidence-based practice guidelines to promote breastfeeding in a comprehensive and multi-level manner. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Clinical Trials NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana Azulay Chertok
- grid.20627.310000 0001 0668 7841Ohio University, Athens, OH USA ,grid.443022.30000 0004 0636 0840Ruppin College, Emek Hefer, Israel
| | - Rada Artzi-Medvedik
- grid.20627.310000 0001 0668 7841Ohio University, Athens, OH USA ,grid.7489.20000 0004 1937 0511Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, Israel
| | - Maryse Arendt
- BLL Beruffsverband vun den Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Emma Sacks
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- grid.8194.40000 0000 9828 7548Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Carina Rodrigues
- grid.5808.50000 0001 1503 7226Instituto de Saude Publica, Universidade Do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Raquel Costa
- grid.5808.50000 0001 1503 7226Instituto de Saude Publica, Universidade Do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Karolina Linden
- grid.8761.80000 0000 9919 9582Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- grid.411843.b0000 0004 0623 9987Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Helen Elden
- grid.8761.80000 0000 9919 9582Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Daniela Drandic
- Reproductive Rights Advocacy Program (RODA)- Parents in Action, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Céline Miani
- grid.7491.b0000 0001 0944 9128School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- grid.418712.90000 0004 1760 7415Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- grid.418712.90000 0004 1760 7415Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- grid.418712.90000 0004 1760 7415Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- grid.418712.90000 0004 1760 7415Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nedberg IH, Vik ES, Kongslien S, Mariani I, Valente EP, Covi B, Lazzerini M, Roda DD, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Morano S, Chertok I, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Vaska A, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Quality of health care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study in Norway and trends over time. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:85-96. [PMID: 36530008 PMCID: PMC9877678 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe maternal perception of the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in facilities in Norway during the first year of COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Women who gave birth in a Norwegian facility from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, filled out a structured online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess changes in QMNC index over time. RESULTS Among 3326 women included, 3085 experienced labor. Of those, 1799 (58.3%) reported that their partner could not be present as much as needed, 918 (29.8%) noted inadequate staff numbers, 183 (43.6%) lacked a consent request for instrumental vaginal birth (IVB), 1067 (34.6%) reported inadequate communication from staff, 78 (18.6%) reported fundal pressure during IVB, 670 (21.7%) reported that they were not treated with dignity, and 249 (8.1%) reported experiencing abuse. The QMNC index increased gradually over time (3.68 points per month, 95% CI, 2.83-4.53 for the median), with the domains of COVID-19 reorganizational changes and experience of care displaying the greatest increases, while provision of care was stable over time. CONCLUSION Although several measures showed high QMNC in Norway during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, and a gradual improvement over time, several findings suggest that gaps in QMNC exist. These gaps should be addressed and monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of Health and Caring SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| | - Sigrun Kongslien
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Costa R, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Covi B, Mariani I, Valente EP, Zaigham M, Vik ES, Grylka‐Baeschlin S, Arendt M, Santos T, Wandschneider L, Drglin Z, Drandić D, Radetic J, Rozée V, Elden H, Mueller AN, Barata C, Miani C, Bohinec A, Ruzicic J, de La Rochebrochard E, Linden K, Geremia S, de Labrusse C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Ponikvar BM, Sacks E, Lazzerini M. Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth for migrant versus nonmigrant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 11 countries of the WHO European region. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:39-53. [PMID: 36530012 PMCID: PMC9877819 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the perception of quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth among migrant and nonmigrant women in Europe. METHODS Women who gave birth at a health facility in 11 countries of the WHO European Region from March 2020 to July 2021 were invited to answer an online questionnaire including demographics and childbirth experience. Data were analyzed and compared for 1781 migrant and 20 653 nonmigrant women. RESULTS Migrant women who experienced labor perceived slightly more difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits (41.2% vs 39.4%; P = 0.001), more barriers in accessing facilities (32.9% vs 29.9%; P = 0.001), lack of timely care (14.7% vs 13.0%; P = 0.025), inadequate room comfort and equipment (9.2% vs 8.5%; P = 0.004), inadequate number of women per room (9.4% vs 8.6%; P = 0.039), being prevented from staying with their baby as they wished (7.8% vs 6.9%; P = 0.011), or suffering abuse (14.5% vs 12.7%; P = 0.022) compared with nonmigrant women. For women who had a prelabor cesarean, migrant women were more likely not to receive pain relief after birth (16.8% vs.13.5%; P = 0.039) and less likely to provide informal payment (1.8% vs 4.4%; P = 0.005) compared with nonmigrant women. Overall, the QMNC index was not significantly different for migrant compared with nonmigrant women. CONCLUSION Gaps in overall QMNC were reported by both migrant and nonmigrant women, with improvements to healthcare necessary for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit ‐ Instituto de Saúde PúblicaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal,Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR)PortoPortugal,Lusófona University/HEI‐Lab: Digital Human‐environment Interaction LabsLisbonPortugal
| | - Carina Rodrigues
- EPIUnit ‐ Instituto de Saúde PúblicaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal,Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR)PortoPortugal
| | - Heloísa Dias
- Regional Health Administration of the AlgarveLisbonPortugal
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInstitution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of Health and Caring SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| | - Susanne Grylka‐Baeschlin
- Research Institute of Midwifery, School of Health SciencesZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
| | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional Association of Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg)LuxembourgLuxembourg
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade EuropeiaLisbonPortugal,Plataforma CatólicaMed/Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica PortuguesaLisbonPortugal
| | - Lisa Wandschneider
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public HealthBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public HealthLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | | | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research UnitInstitut National d'Études Démographiques (INED)ParisFrance
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| | - Antonia N. Mueller
- Research Institute of Midwifery, School of Health SciencesZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public HealthBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany,Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research UnitInstitut National d'Études Démographiques (INED)ParisFrance
| | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public HealthLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | - Elise de La Rochebrochard
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research UnitInstitut National d'Études Démographiques (INED)ParisFrance
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Sara Geremia
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV)HES‐SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Stephanie Batram‐Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public HealthBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
| | | | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Drandić D, Drglin Z, Mihevc Ponikvar B, Bohinec A, Ćerimagić A, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Kurbanović M, Covi B, Valente EP, Mariani I, Lazzerini M, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Hefer E, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Women's perspectives on the quality of hospital maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study in Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:54-69. [PMID: 36530003 PMCID: PMC9877897 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in countries of the former Yugoslavia. METHOD Women giving birth in a facility in Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina between March 1, 2020 and July 1, 2021 answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. RESULTS A total of 4817 women were included in the analysis. Significant differences were observed across countries. Among those experiencing labor, 47.4%-62.3% of women perceived a reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 40.1%-69.7% experienced difficulties in accessing routine antenatal care, 60.3%-98.1% were not allowed a companion of choice, 17.4%-39.2% reported that health workers were not always using personal protective equipment, and 21.2%-53.8% rated the number of health workers as insufficient. Episiotomy was performed in 30.9%-62.8% of spontaneous vaginal births. Additionally, 22.6%-55.9% of women received inadequate breastfeeding support, 21.5%-62.8% reported not being treated with dignity, 11.0%-30.5% suffered abuse, and 0.7%-26.5% made informal payments. Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Slovenia showing the highest QMNC index, followed by Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Serbia. CONCLUSION Differences in QMNC among the countries of the former Yugoslavia during the COVID-19 pandemic were significant. Activities to promote high-quality, evidence-based, respectful care for all mothers and newborns are urgently needed. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public HealthLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public HealthLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | | | | | | | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Rozée V, Costa R, Otelea MR, Abderhalden-Zellweger A, Węgrzynowska M, Linden K, Arendt M, Brigidi S, Miani C, Pumpure E, Radetic J, Drandic D, Cerimagic A, Nedberg IH, Liepinaitienė A, Rodrigues C, de Labrusse C, Baranowska B, Zaigham M, Castañeda LM, Batram-Zantvoort S, Jakovicka D, Ruzicic J, Juciūtė S, Santos T, Gemperle M, Tataj-Puzyna U, Elden H, Mizgaitienė M, Lincetto O, Sacks E, Mariani I. Rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean and quality of maternal and newborn health care in private versus public facilities: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 16 countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:22-38. [PMID: 36530007 PMCID: PMC10108180 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic by facility type among 16 European countries, comparing rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean. METHODS Women who gave birth in the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020, to February 7, 2022, answered a validated online questionnaire. Rates of instrumental birth, instrumental vaginal birth, and cesarean, and a QMNC index were calculated for births in public versus private facilities. RESULTS Responses from 25 206 participants were analyzed. Women giving birth in private compared with public facilities reported significantly more frequent total cesarean (32.5% vs 19.0%; aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.52-1.90), elective cesarean (17.3% vs 7.8%; aOR 1.90; 95% CI 1.65-2.19), and emergency cesarean before labor (7.4% vs 3.9%; aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14-1.70) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons), with analyses by country confirming these results. QMNC index results were heterogeneous across countries and regions in the same country and were largely affected by geographical distribution of regions rather than by type of facility alone. CONCLUSION The study confirms that births in private facilities have higher odds of cesarean. It also suggests that QMNC should be closely monitored in all facilities to achieve high-quality care, independent of facility type or geographical distribution. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | - Raquel Costa
- Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal.,Lusófona University/HEI-Lab: Digital Human-environment Interaction Labs, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.,SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maria Węgrzynowska
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional Association of Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work, Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC), Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Elizabete Pumpure
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Rīga, Latvia.,Riga Maternity Hospital, Rīga, Latvia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carina Rodrigues
- Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
| | - Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Baranowska
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | | | - Simona Juciūtė
- Kaunas University of Applied Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade Europeia, Lisbon, Portugal.,Plataforma CatólicaMed/Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michael Gemperle
- Research Institute of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Urszula Tataj-Puzyna
- Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marija Mizgaitienė
- Kaunas Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ornella Lincetto
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pumpure E, Jakovicka D, Mariani I, Vaska A, Covi B, Valente EP, Jansone‐Šantare G, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Rezeberga D, Lazzerini M, Roda DD, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Morano S, Chertok I, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care in childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:97-112. [PMID: 36530013 PMCID: PMC9878132 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia, comparing the years 2020 and 2021, among women who went into labor or had a prelabor cesarean. METHODS Women giving birth in healthcare facilities in Latvia from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed to compare QMNC in 2020 and 2021. RESULTS 2079 women were included in the analysis: 1860 women who went into labor (group 1) and 219 with prelabor cesarean (group 2). Among group 1, 66.4% (n = 99/149) of women received fundal pressure in an instrumental vaginal birth, 43.5% (n = 810) lacked involvement in choices, 17.4% (n = 317) reported suffering abuse, 32.7% (n = 609) reported inadequate breastfeeding support while 5.2% (n = 96) lack of early breastfeeding. A significant reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic was reported by 29.5% (n = 219) and 25.0% (n = 270) of respondents in 2020 and 2021, respectively (P = 0.045). Multivariate analyses highlighted a significantly lower QMNC index for 2020 compared with 2021 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION This first study investigating QMNC in Latvia showed significant gaps in QMNC perceived by respondents, with slightly better results in 2021. Appropriate healthcare strategies to improve health care for women and newborns in Latvia are required. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier:NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabete Pumpure
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRiga Stradins UniversityRigaLatvia,Riga Maternity HospitalRigaLatvia
| | | | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Gita Jansone‐Šantare
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRiga Stradins UniversityRigaLatvia,Riga Maternity HospitalRigaLatvia
| | | | | | - Dace Rezeberga
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRiga Stradins UniversityRigaLatvia,Riga Maternity HospitalRigaLatvia
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Labrusse C, Abderhalden‐Zellweger A, Mariani I, Pfund A, Gemperle M, Grylka‐Baeschlin S, Mueller AN, Valente E, Covi B, Lazzerini M, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Hefer E, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Quality of maternal and newborn care in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study based on WHO quality standards. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:70-84. [PMID: 36530005 PMCID: PMC9877813 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in healthcare facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. METHODS Women giving birth in Switzerland answered a validated online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. QMNC score was calculated according to linguistic region and mode of birth. Differences were assessed using logistic regression analysis adjusting for relevant variables. RESULTS A total of 1175 women were included in the analysis. Limitations in QMNC during the pandemic were reported by 328 (27.9%) women. Several quality measures, such as deficient communication (18.0%, n = 212), insufficient number of healthcare professionals (19.7%, n = 231), no information on the newborn after cesarean (26.5%, n = 91) or maternal and newborn danger signs (34.1%, n = 401 and 41.4% n = 487, respectively) suggested preventable gaps in QMNC. Quality measures significantly differed by linguistic region and mode of birth. Multivariate analysis established a significantly lower QMNC for women in French- and Italian-speaking regions compared with the German-speaking region. Moreover, in several quality indicators reflecting communication with healthcare providers, women who did not answer the questionnaire in one of the Swiss national languages had significantly worse scores than others. A significant lower QMNC was also found for young and primiparous women and for those who experienced cesarean or instrumental vaginal birth. CONCLUSION Women giving birth in Switzerland during the pandemic reported notable gaps in QMNC. Providers should be attuned to women who are younger, primiparous, and those who had an emergency cesarean or instrumental vaginal birth given the lower QMNC reported by these groups. Women who did not respond in a Swiss national language may need improved communication strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV)HES‐SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Alessia Abderhalden‐Zellweger
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV)HES‐SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Anouck Pfund
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV)HES‐SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Michael Gemperle
- Research Institute for MidwiferyZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
| | | | - Antonia N. Mueller
- Research Institute for MidwiferyZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Otelea MR, Simionescu AA, Mariani I, Valente EP, Nanu MI, Nanu I, Handra CM, Covi B, Lazzerini M, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Vaska A, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Women's assessment of the quality of hospital-based perinatal care by mode of birth in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:126-136. [PMID: 36530009 PMCID: PMC9877960 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess women's perceptions of the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) received in hospitals in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic by mode of birth. METHODS A validated anonymous online questionnaire based on WHO quality measures. Subgroup analysis of spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB), emergency cesarean, and elective cesarean and multivariate analyses were performed, and QMNC indexes were calculated. Maternal age, educational level, year of birth, mother born in Romania, parity, type of hospital, and type of professionals assisting the birth were used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 620 women completed the survey. Overall, several quality measures suggested gaps in QMNC in Romania, with the lowest QMNC indexes reported for provision of care and availability of resources. Women who had either elective or emergency cesarean compared with those who had SVB more frequently lacked early breastfeeding (OR 2.04 and 2.13, respectively), skin-to-skin contact (OR 1.73 and 1.75, respectively), rooming-in (OR 2.07 and 1.96, respectively), and exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (OR 2.27 and 1.64, respectively). Compared with elective cesarean, emergency cesarean had higher odds of ineffective communication by healthcare providers (OR 1.65), lack of involvement in choices (OR 1.58), insufficient emotional support (OR 2.07), and no privacy (OR 2.06). Compared with other modes of birth, a trend for lower QMNC indexes for emergency cesarean was observed for all domains, while for elective cesarean the QMNC index for provision of care was significantly lower. CONCLUSION Quality indicators of perinatal care remain behind targets in Romania, with births by cesarean the most affected. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anca Angela Simionescu
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol DavilaBucharestRomania,Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsFilantropia Clinical HospitalBucharestRomania
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Michaela Iuliana Nanu
- Social Obstetrics and Pediatric Research UnitNational Institute for Mother and Child HealthBucharestRomania
| | - Ioana Nanu
- Social Obstetrics and Pediatric Research UnitNational Institute for Mother and Child HealthBucharestRomania
| | | | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Costa R, Barata C, Dias H, Rodrigues C, Santos T, Mariani I, Covi B, Valente EP, Lazzerini M, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Hefer E, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Regional differences in the quality of maternal and neonatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:137-153. [PMID: 36530002 PMCID: PMC9878220 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth across Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics 2 (NUTS-II) regions in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Women participating in the cross-sectional IMAgiNE EURO study who gave birth in Portugal from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, completed a structured questionnaire with 40 key WHO standards-based quality measures. Four domains of QMNC were assessed: (1) provision of care; (2) experience of care; (3) availability of human and physical resources; and (4) reorganizational changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Frequencies for each quality measure within each QMNC domain were computed overall and by region. RESULTS Out of 1845 participants, one-third (33.7%) had a cesarean. Examples of high-quality care included: low frequencies of lack of early breastfeeding and rooming-in (8.0% and 7.7%, respectively) and informal payment (0.7%); adequate staff professionalism (94.6%); adequate room comfort and equipment (95.2%). However, substandard practices with large heterogeneity across regions were also reported. Among women who experienced labor, the percentage of instrumental vaginal births ranged from 22.3% in the Algarve to 33.5% in Center; among these, fundal pressure ranged from 34.8% in Lisbon to 66.7% in Center. Episiotomy was performed in 39.3% of noninstrumental vaginal births with variations between 31.8% in the North to 59.8% in Center. One in four women reported inadequate breastfeeding support (26.1%, ranging from 19.4% in Algarve to 31.5% in Lisbon). One in five reported no exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (22.1%; 19.5% in Lisbon to 28.2% in Algarve). CONCLUSION Urgent actions are needed to harmonize QMNC and reduce inequities across regions in Portugal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Costa
- EPIUnitInstituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal,Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR)PortoPortugal,Lusófona University/HEI‐Lab: Digital Human‐Environment Interaction LabsPortoPortugal
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal,Associação Portuguesa Pelos Direitos da Mulher na Gravidez e PartoLisbonPortugal
| | - Heloísa Dias
- Administração Regional de Saúde do AlgarveAlgarvePortugal
| | - Carina Rodrigues
- EPIUnitInstituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal,Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR)PortoPortugal
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade EuropeiaLisbonPortugal,Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica PortuguesaLisbonPortugal
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating CenterInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating CenterInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating CenterInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating CenterInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miani C, Wandschneider L, Batram-Zantvoort S, Covi B, Elden H, Nedberg IH, Drglin Z, Pumpure E, Costa R, Rozée V, Otelea MR, Drandić D, Radetic J, Abderhalden-Zellweger A, Ćerimagić A, Arendt M, Mariani I, Linden K, Ponikvar BM, Jakovicka D, Dias H, Ruzicic J, de Labrusse C, Valente EP, Zaigham M, Bohinec A, Rezeberga D, Barata C, Pfund A, Sacks E, Lazzerini M, Drandić Roda D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Hefer E, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Individual and country-level variables associated with the medicalization of birth: Multilevel analyses of IMAgiNE EURO data from 15 countries in the WHO European region. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:9-21. [PMID: 36530006 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate potential associations between individual and country-level factors and medicalization of birth in 15 European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Online anonymous survey of women who gave birth in 2020-2021. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression models estimating associations between indicators of medicalization (cesarean, instrumental vaginal birth [IVB], episiotomy, fundal pressure) and proxy variables related to care culture and contextual factors at the individual and country level. RESULTS Among 27 173 women, 24.4% (n = 6650) had a cesarean and 8.8% (n = 2380) an IVB. Among women with IVB, 41.9% (n = 998) reported receiving fundal pressure. Among women with spontaneous vaginal births, 22.3% (n = 4048) had an episiotomy. Less respectful care, as perceived by the women, was associated with higher levels of medicalization. For example, women who reported having a cesarean, IVB, or episiotomy reported not feeling treated with dignity more frequently than women who did not have those interventions (odds ratio [OR] 1.37; OR 1.61; OR 1.51, respectively; all: P < 0.001). Country-level variables contributed to explaining some of the variance between countries. CONCLUSION We recommend a greater emphasis in health policies on promotion of respectful and patient-centered care approaches to birth to enhance women's experiences of care, and the development of a European-level indicator to monitor medicalization of reproductive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Aubervilliers, France
| | - Lisa Wandschneider
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Elizabete Pumpure
- Riga Maternity Hospital, Riga, Latvia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Raquel Costa
- Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal.,Lusófona University/HEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Aubervilliers, France
| | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.,SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Heloisa Dias
- Administração Regional de Saúde do Algarve, Algarve, Portugal
| | | | - Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö and Lund, Sweden
| | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dace Rezeberga
- Riga Maternity Hospital, Riga, Latvia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Anouk Pfund
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Arendt M, Tasch B, Conway F, Lecomte A, Covi B, Mariani I, Valente EP, Lazzerini M. Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth in Luxembourg during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:113-125. [PMID: 36530011 PMCID: PMC9877667 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during childbirth in Luxembourg from women's perspectives. METHODS Women giving birth in facilities in Luxembourg between March 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021, answered a validated online WHO standards-based questionnaire as part of the multicountry IMAgINE EURO study. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 493 women were included, representing 5.2% of women giving birth in the four maternity hospitals in Luxembourg during the study period. Most quality measures suggested high QMNC, although specific gaps were observed: 13.4% (n = 66) of women reported not being treated with dignity, 9.1% (n = 45) experienced abuse, 42.9% (n = 30) were not asked for consent prior to instrumental vaginal birth, 39.3% (n = 118) could not choose their birth position, 27% (n = 133) did not exclusively breastfeed at discharge (without significant differences over time), 20.5% (n = 101) reported an insufficient number of healthcare professionals, 20% (n = 25) did not receive information on the newborn after cesarean, and 41.2% (n = 203) reported lack of information on newborn danger signs before discharge. Multivariate analyses highlighted higher reported QMNC indexes among women born outside Luxembourg and delivering with a gynecologist, and significantly lower QMNC indexes in women with the highest education levels and those delivering in the hospital offering some private services. CONCLUSIONS Despite maternal reports suggesting an overall high QMNC in Luxembourg, improvements are needed in specific aspects of care and communication, mostly related to maternal autonomy, respect, and support, but also number and competencies of the health workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asblLuxembourgLuxembourg
| | - Barbara Tasch
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asblLuxembourgLuxembourg,Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, KannerKlinik, Centre Hospitalier de LuxembourgLuxembourgLuxembourg
| | - Francesca Conway
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Aline Lecomte
- Luxembourg Institute of Health, Department of Population Health/Public Health ExpertiseLuxembourgLuxembourg
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miani C, Wandschneider L, Batram-Zantvoort S, Covi B, Elden H, Hersoug Nedberg I, Drglin Z, Pumpere E, Costa R, Lazzerini M. Individual and country-level variables associated with the medicalization of birth. Eur J Public Health 2022. [PMCID: PMC9594081 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction According to the World Health Organization, the medicalisation of birth tends “to undermine the woman's own capability to give birth and negatively impacts her childbirth experience”. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted maternity care, with potential increase in the medicalisation of birth and in occurrences of disrespectful maternity care. We aim to investigate potential associations between individual and country-level factors and medicalisation of birth in 15 European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We collected data through an online, anonymous survey for women who gave birth in 2020-2021. We ran multivariable, multi-level logistic regression models estimating associations between indicators of medicalisation (caesarean section (CS), instrumental vaginal birth (IVB), episiotomy, fundal pressure) and proxy variables related to care culture and contextual factors at the individual and country-level. Results Among 27173 women, 24.4% had a CS, and 8.8% an IVB. Among women with IVB, 41.9% reported receiving fundal pressure. Among women with spontaneous vaginal births, 22.3% had an episiotomy. Less respectful care, as perceived by the women, was associated with higher levels of medicalisation. For example, women who reported having CS, IVB and episiotomy reported not feeling treated with dignity more frequently than women who didn't have those interventions (respectively: OR: 1.37; OR: 1.61; OR: 1.51; all: p < 0.001). Country-level variables contributed to explaining some of the variance between countries. Conclusions We recommend a greater emphasis in health policies on the promotion of respectful and patient-centered care approaches to birth to enhance women's experiences of care, and the development of a European-level indicator to monitor the medicalisation of reproductive care. Speakers/Panellists Emanuelle Pessa Valente WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS, Trieste, Italy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Miani
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University , Bielefeld, Germany
- Ined , Aubervilliers, France
| | - L Wandschneider
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University , Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - B Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS , Trieste, Italy
| | - H Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - I Hersoug Nedberg
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromso, Norway
| | - Z Drglin
- National Institute of Public Health , Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - E Pumpere
- Riga Maternity Hospital , Riga, Latvia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University , Riga, Latvia
| | - R Costa
- EPIUnit, University of Porto , Porto, Portugal
| | - M Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS , Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Drglin Z, Arendt M, Hersoug Nedberg I, Elden H, Costa R, Drandic D, Pessa Valente E. Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Public Health 2022. [PMCID: PMC9593502 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking. Methods Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures. Results 21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N = 18,063), 41.8% (26.1%- 63.5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12.6%-99.0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31.1% (16.5%-56.9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34.4% (5.2%-64.8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31.8% (17.8%-53.1%) rated the health workers’ number as “insufficient”. Episiotomy was performed in 20.1% (6.1%-66.0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41.2% (11.5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23.9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12.8%-59.8%), 12.5% (7.0%-23.4%) suffered abuse, and 2.4% (0.1%-26.2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N = 2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significantly lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes. Conclusions Mothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed. Funding: The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS , Trieste, Italy
| | - B Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS , Trieste, Italy
| | - I Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS , Trieste, Italy
| | - Z Drglin
- National Institute of Public Health , Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - M Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen , Luxemburg, Luxembourg
| | - I Hersoug Nedberg
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway , Tromso, Norway
| | - H Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - R Costa
- EPIUnit, University of Porto , Porto, Portugal
- Hei-Lab, Lusofona University , Porto, Portugal
- IRT , Porto, Portugal
| | - D Drandic
- Roda-Parents in Action , Zagreb, Croatia
| | - E Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS , Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Drglin Z, Arendt M, Nedberg IH, Elden H, Costa R, Drandić D, Radetić J, Otelea MR, Miani C, Brigidi S, Rozée V, Ponikvar BM, Tasch B, Kongslien S, Linden K, Barata C, Kurbanović M, Ružičić J, Batram-Zantvoort S, Castañeda LM, Rochebrochard EDL, Bohinec A, Vik ES, Zaigham M, Santos T, Wandschneider L, Viver AC, Ćerimagić A, Sacks E, Valente EP. Corrections to “Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region”. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022; 19:100461. [PMID: 35891895 PMCID: PMC9306332 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
17
|
Senanayake H, Mariani I, Valente EP, Piccoli M, Armocida B, Businelli C, Rishard M, Covi B, Lazzerini M. Outcomes of induction versus spontaneous onset of labour at 40 and 41 GW: findings from a prospective database, Sri Lanka. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:518. [PMID: 35761191 PMCID: PMC9235207 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04800-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The World Health Organization recommends induction of labour (IOL) for low risk pregnancy from 41 + 0 gestational weeks (GW). Nevertheless, in Sri Lanka IOL at 40 GW is a common practice. This study compares maternal/newborn outcomes after IOL at 40 GW (IOL40) or 41 GW (IOL41) versus spontaneous onset of labour (SOL). Methods Data were extracted from the routine prospective individual patient database of the Soysa Teaching Hospital for Women, Colombo. IOL and SOL groups were compared using logistic regression. Results Of 13,670 deliveries, 2359 (17.4%) were singleton and low risk at 40 or 41 GW. Of these, 456 (19.3%) women underwent IOL40, 318 (13.5%) IOL41, and 1585 (67.2%) SOL. Both IOL40 and IOL41 were associated with an increased risk of any maternal/newborn negative outcomes (OR = 2.21, 95%CI = 1.75–2.77, p < 0.001 and OR = 1.91, 95%CI = 1.47–2.48, p < 0.001 respectively), maternal complications (OR = 2.18, 95%CI = 1.71–2.77, p < 0.001 and OR = 2.34, 95%CI = 1.78–3.07, p < 0.001 respectively) and caesarean section (OR = 2.75, 95%CI = 2.07–3.65, p < 0.001 and OR = 3.01, 95%CI = 2.21–4.12, p < 0.001 respectively). Results did not change in secondary and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Both IOL groups were associated with higher risk of negative outcomes compared to SOL. Findings, potentially explained by selection bias, local IOL protocols and CS practices, are valuable for Sri Lanka, particularly given contradictory findings from other settings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04800-1.
Collapse
|
18
|
Valente EP, Mariani I, Covi B, Lazzerini M. Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:ijerph19127166. [PMID: 35742415 PMCID: PMC9222941 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Background: Few studies have explored consent request practices during childbirth. Objective: We explored consent request practices during childbirth in a referral hospital and research centre in Italy, capturing both women and health workers’ perspectives. Methods: Data were collected using self-administrated questionnaires between December 2016 and September 2018. Nine key maternal and newborn procedures were analysed. Associations between consent requests and women characteristics were explored by multiple logistic regression. Results: Among 1244 women, the rate of consent requests varied widely, with caesarean section (CS) showing the highest rate (89.1%) and neonatal conjunctivitis prophylaxis presenting the lowest rate (11.4%). Information provided on “risks/benefits” and “reasons” for procedures by health staff was most often not comprehensive for procedures of interest (range 18.6–87.4%). The lack of informed consent is not specifically linked to any pattern of women characteristics. According to 105 health workers, adequate protocols and standard forms for consent requests were available in 67.6% and 78.1% of cases, respectively, while less than one third (31.4%) reported having received adequate training and supportive supervision on how to deliver informed consent. Conclusions: Study findings align with previous evidence showing that consent request practices during childbirth need to be largely improved. More research is needed to investigate effective strategies for improvement.
Collapse
|
19
|
Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Otalea M, Nanu I, Nanu MI, Elden H, Linden K, Zaigham M, Vik ES, Kongslien S, Nedberg I, Costa R, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Sacks E, Muzigaba M, Lincetto O, Lazzerini M. WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers' perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region: development and mixed-methods validation in six countries. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056753. [PMID: 35396296 PMCID: PMC8995570 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Develop and validate a WHO Standards-based online questionnaire to measure the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth from the health workers' perspective. DESIGN Mixed-methods study. SETTING Six countries of the WHO European Region. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS The questionnaire is based on lessons learnt in previous studies, and was developed in three sequential phases: (1) WHO Quality Measures were prioritised and content, construct and face validity were assessed through a Delphi involving a multidisciplinary board of experts from 11 countries of the WHO European Region; (2) translation/back translation of the English version was conducted following The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research guidelines; (3) internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability were assessed among 600 health workers in six countries. RESULTS The questionnaire included 40 items based on WHO Standards Quality Measures, equally divided into four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, organisational changes due to COVID-19; and its organised in six sections. It was translated/back translated in 12 languages: Bosnian, Croatian, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish. The Cronbach's alpha values were ≥0.70 for each questionnaire section where questions were hypothesised to be interrelated, indicating good internal consistence. Cohen K or Gwet's AC1 values were ≥0.60, suggesting good intrarater reliability, except for one question. Acceptability was good with only 1.70% of health workers requesting minimal changes in question wording. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that the questionnaire has good content, construct, face validity, internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability in six countries of the WHO European Region. Future studies may further explore the questionnaire's use in other countries, and how to translate evidence generated by this tool into policies to improve the QMNC. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Sandra Morano
- Medical School and Midwifery School, Genoa University, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marina Otalea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
- SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Nanu
- National Institute for Mother and Child Health "Alessandrescu - Rusescu", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Micaela Iuliana Nanu
- National Institute for Mother and Child Health "Alessandrescu - Rusescu", Bucharest, Romania
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sigrun Kongslien
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Ingvild Nedberg
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Human-Environment Interaction Lab, Universidade Lusófona, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carina Rodrigues
- EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
| | - Heloísa Dias
- Regional Health Administration of the Algarve, IP (ARS - Algarve), Albufeira, Portugal
| | | | | | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Moise Muzigaba
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ornella Lincetto
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lazzerini M, Argentini G, Mariani I, Covi B, Semenzato C, Lincetto O, Muzigaba M, Valente EP. WHO standards-based tool to measure women's views on the quality of care around the time of childbirth at facility level in the WHO European region: development and validation in Italy. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e048195. [PMID: 35172991 PMCID: PMC8852667 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A comprehensive WHO standards-based tool to measure women's perceived quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in health facilities is needed to allow for comparisons of data across settings and over time. This paper describes the development of such a tool, and its validation in Italy. DESIGN A multiphase, mixed-methods study involving qualitative and quantitative research methods. SETTING Nine health facilities in Italy. METHODS The questionnaire was developed in six phases: (1) Defining the scope, characteristics and a potential list of measures for the tool; (2) initial content and construct validation; (3) first field testing to assess acceptability and perceived utility for end-users (1244 women, 35 decision makers) and further explore construct validity; (4) content optimisation and score development; (5) assessment of face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency and (6) second field testing in nine maternity hospitals (4295 women, 78 decision-makers). RESULTS The final version of the tool included 116 questions accounting for 99 out of the 350 of the extended lists of WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was very good, with 100% agreement for 101 (87%) questions and Kappa exceeding 0.60 for remaining ones. Reliability was good, with either high agreement or Kappa exceeding 0.60 for all items. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.84 to 0.88, indicating very good internal consistency. Acceptability across seven hospitals was good (mean response rate: 57.4%, 95% CI 44.4% to 70.5%). The questionnaire proved to be useful, driving the development of actions plan to improve the QMNC in each facility. CONCLUSIONS Study findings suggest that the tool has good content, construct, face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency, while being acceptable and useful. Therefore, it could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar context. More research should investigate how effectively use the tool in different countries for improving the QMNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Giorgia Argentini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Chiara Semenzato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - O Lincetto
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Moise Muzigaba
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Drglin Z, Arendt M, Nedberg IH, Elden H, Costa R, Drandić D, Radetić J, Otelea MR, Miani C, Brigidi S, Rozée V, Ponikvar BM, Tasch B, Kongslien S, Linden K, Barata C, Kurbanović M, Ružičić J, Batram-Zantvoort S, Castañeda LM, Rochebrochard EDL, Bohinec A, Vik ES, Zaigham M, Santos T, Wandschneider L, Viver AC, Ćerimagić A, Sacks E, Valente EP. Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022; 13:100268. [PMID: 34977838 PMCID: PMC8703114 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking. METHODS Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures. FINDINGS 21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the health workers' number as "insufficient". Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes. INTERPRETATION Mothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed. FUNDING The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. STUDY REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | | | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska university hospital, Dept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Hei-Lab:Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab. Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
- SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work. Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC). Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | | | - Barbara Tasch
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Neonatal intensive care unit, KannerKlinik, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Sigrun Kongslien
- Department of health and care sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | | | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Elise de La Rochebrochard
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of health and caring sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lisa Wandschneider
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | | | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - IMAgiNE EURO study group
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Department of community medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska university hospital, Dept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- EPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Hei-Lab:Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab. Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
- Roda – Parents in Action, Zagreb, Croatia
- Centar za mame, Belgrade, Serbia
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
- SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work. Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC). Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
- Neonatal intensive care unit, KannerKlinik, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Department of health and care sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
- Institut Català de la Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
- Department of health and caring sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Universidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Institut Català d'Antropologia (ICA), Barcelona, Spain
- NGO Baby Steps, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Giusti A, Valente EP, Ćerimagić A, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Verardi G, Zanin B, Morano S, Chertok I, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Vaska A, Jakovicka D, Rudzīte P, Ērmane E, Vilcāne KP, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Yarotskaya E, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Viver AC, Elden H, Linden K, Zaigham M, Sengpiel V, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H. Quality of care at childbirth: findings of IMAgiNE EURO in Italy during the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 157:405-417. [PMID: 35092692 PMCID: PMC9087757 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective Investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during childbirth in the first year of COVID‐19 pandemic in Italy, from the mothers' perspective, as key service users. Methods Women who gave birth in an Italian facility from March 1, 2020 to February 29, 2021 answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO Standard‐based Quality Measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed. Results In total, 4824 women were included, reporting heterogeneity of practices across regions: among 3981 women who underwent labour 78.4% (63.0%–92.0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 44.6% (28.9%–53.3%) had difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits, 36.3% (24.9%–61.1%) reported inadequate breastfeeding support, 39.2% (23.3%–62.2%) felt not involved in medical choices, 33.0% (23.9%–49.3%) experienced unclear communication from staff, 24.8% (15.9%–39.4%) were not always treated with dignity and 12.7% (10.1%–29.3%) reported abuses. Findings in the group of women who did not experience labour were substantially similar. Multivariate analyses confirmed a significant lower QMNC index for regions in southern Italy compared to North and Central regions. Conclusion Mothers reported substantial inequities in the QMNC across Italian regions. Future studies should monitor QMNC over time. Meanwhile, actions to ensure high QMNC for all mothers and newborns across Italy are urgently required. Mothers giving birth in the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic reported substantial inequities across Italian regions in the QMNC around the time of childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Angela Giusti
- National Centre for Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion National Institute of Health Rome Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zaigham M, Linden K, Sengpiel V, Mariani I, Valente EP, Covi B, Lazzerini M, Elden H. Large gaps in the quality of healthcare experienced by Swedish mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study based on WHO standards. Women Birth 2022; 35:619-627. [PMID: 35123922 PMCID: PMC8784577 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and Problem Existing healthcare systems have been put under immense pressure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disruptions in essential maternal and newborn services have come from even high-income countries within the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. Aim To describe the quality of care during pregnancy and childbirth, as reported by the women themselves, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden, using the WHO ‘Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities’. Methods Using an anonymous, online questionnaire, women ≥18 years were invited to participate if they had given birth in Sweden from March 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. The quality of maternal and newborn care was measured using 40 questions across four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of human/physical resources, and organisational changes due to COVID-19. Findings Of the 5003 women included, n = 4528 experienced labour. Of these, 46.7% perceived a poorer quality of maternal and newborn care due to the COVID-19. Fundal pressure was applied in 22.2% of instrumental vaginal births, 36.8% received inadequate breastfeeding support and 6.9% reported some form of abuse. Findings were worse in women undergoing prelabour Caesarean section (CS) (n = 475). Multivariate analysis showed significant associations of the quality of maternal and newborn care to year of birth (P < 0.001), parity (P < 0.001), no pharmacological pain relief (P < 0.001), prelabour CS (P < 0.001), emergency CS (P < 0.001) and overall satisfaction (P < 0.001). Conclusion Considerable gaps over many key quality measures and deviations from women-centred care were noted. Findings were worse in women with prelabour CS. Actions to promote high-quality, evidence-based and respectful care during childbirth for all mothers are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Parri N, Magistà AM, Marchetti F, Cantoni B, Arrighini A, Romanengo M, Felici E, Urbino A, Da Dalt L, Verdoni L, Armocida B, Covi B, Mariani I, Giacchero R, Musolino AM, Binotti M, Biban P, Fasoli S, Pilotto C, Nicoloso F, Raggi M, Miorin E, Buonsenso D, Chiossi M, Agostiniani R, Plebani A, Barbieri MA, Lanari M, Arrigo S, Zoia E, Lenge M, Masi S, Barbi E, Lazzerini M. Characteristic of COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients: early findings from two Italian Pediatric Research Networks. Eur J Pediatr 2020; 179:1315-1323. [PMID: 32495147 PMCID: PMC7269687 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03683-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Detailed data on clinical presentations and outcomes of children with COVID-19 in Europe are still lacking. In this descriptive study, we report on 130 children with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed by 28 centers (mostly hospitals), in 10 regions in Italy, during the first months of the pandemic. Among these, 67 (51.5%) had a relative with COVID-19 while 34 (26.2%) had comorbidities, with the most frequent being respiratory, cardiac, or neuromuscular chronic diseases. Overall, 98 (75.4%) had an asymptomatic or mild disease, 11 (8.5%) had moderate disease, 11 (8.5%) had a severe disease, and 9 (6.9%) had a critical presentation with infants below 6 months having significantly increased risk of critical disease severity (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 29.1). Seventy-five (57.7%) children were hospitalized, 15 (11.5%) needed some respiratory support, and nine (6.9%) were treated in an intensive care unit. All recovered.Conclusion:This descriptive case series of children with COVID-19, mostly encompassing of cases enrolled at hospital level, suggest that COVID-19 may have a non-negligible rate of severe presentations in selected pediatric populations with a relatively high rates of comorbidities. More studies are needed to further understand the presentation and outcomes of children with COVID-19 in children with special needs. What is Known: • There is limited evidence on the clinical presentation and outcomes of children with COVID-19 in Europe, and almost no evidence on characteristics and risk factors of severe cases. What is New: • Among a case series of 130 children, mostly diagnosed at hospital level, and with a relatively high rate (26.2%) of comorbidities, about three-quarter had an asymptomatic or mild disease. • However, 57.7% were hospitalized, 11.5% needed some respiratory support, and 6.9% were treated in an intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niccolò Parri
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Meyer University Children’s Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Barbara Cantoni
- Healthcare Professional Department Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Arrighini
- Pediatric Emergency Department, Presidio Ospedale dei Bambini, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Felici
- Pediatric and Pediatric Emergency Unit, The Children Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Antonio Urbino
- Department of Pediatric Emergency, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital - A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Liviana Da Dalt
- Department for Woman and Child Health-Pediatric Emergency Department, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Lucio Verdoni
- Department of Pediatrics, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Benedetta Armocida
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Anna Maria Musolino
- Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Binotti
- Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Paolo Biban
- Department of Neonatal and Paediatric Critical Care, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Pilotto
- Division of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine DAME, Academic Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Danilo Buonsenso
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Anna Plebani
- Pediatric Emergency Unit, Filippo Del Ponte Hospital, ASST-Settelaghi, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Lanari
- Pediatric Emergency Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Serena Arrigo
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Filippo Del Ponte, Varese, Italy
| | - Elena Zoia
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital V. Buzzi, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Lenge
- Clinical Trial Office, Children’s Hospital A. Meyer-University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Child Neurology Unit and Laboratories, Neuroscience Department, Children’s Hospital A. Meyer-University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Functional and Epilepsy Neurosurgery Unit, Neurosurgery Department, Children’s Hospital A. Meyer-University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Masi
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Meyer University Children’s Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Egidio Barbi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Science, Department of Pediatrics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - on behalf of the CONFIDENCE and COVID-19 Italian Pediatric Study Networks
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Meyer University Children’s Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Community Pediatrics, Ravenna, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Ravenna Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
- Healthcare Professional Department Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Pediatric Emergency Department, Presidio Ospedale dei Bambini, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
- Pediatric and Pediatric Emergency Unit, The Children Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
- Department of Pediatric Emergency, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital - A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
- Department for Woman and Child Health-Pediatric Emergency Department, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Lodi Hospital, Lodi, Italy
- Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
- Department of Neonatal and Paediatric Critical Care, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
- Paediatric Unit, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy
- Division of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine DAME, Academic Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
- Family Pediatrician, Udine, Italy
- ICU, Pain Therapy Unit, Rovereto Hospital, Trento, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Latisana-Palmanova, ASUFC, Udine, Italy
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, ASL 4 Liguria, Lavagna, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Ospedale San Jacopo, Pistoia, Italy
- Pediatric Emergency Unit, Filippo Del Ponte Hospital, ASST-Settelaghi, Varese, Italy
- Pediatric Emergency Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Filippo Del Ponte, Varese, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital V. Buzzi, Milan, Italy
- Clinical Trial Office, Children’s Hospital A. Meyer-University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Child Neurology Unit and Laboratories, Neuroscience Department, Children’s Hospital A. Meyer-University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Functional and Epilepsy Neurosurgery Unit, Neurosurgery Department, Children’s Hospital A. Meyer-University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Science, Department of Pediatrics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lazzerini M, Semenzato C, Kaur J, Covi B, Argentini G. Women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a qualitative study in Italy using the WHO standards as framework for the analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:200. [PMID: 32252686 PMCID: PMC7137280 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-02893-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent systematic review identified very few studies on women's views on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC). This study aimed at exploring the suggestions provided by women, after hospital delivery in Italy, on how to improve the QMNC. METHODS A questionnaire, containing open questions to capture suggestions on how to improve QMNC, was used to collect suggestions of mothers who gave birth a tertiary care referral hospital in Northeast Italy, between December 2016 and September 2018. Two authors independently used thematic analysis to analyse women's comments, using the WHO Standards for improving the QMNC as framework for the analysis. RESULTS Overall 392 mothers provided a total of 966 comments on how to improve the QMNC. Overall 45 (11.5%) women made suggestions pertinent to "provision of care", 222 (56.6%) to the "experience of care", 217 (55.4%) to "physical or to human resources". The top five suggestions were: 1) increase presence of a companion during the whole hospitalization (28.3% of women); 2) improve bathrooms and showers (18.4%); 3) improve effective communication from staff (14.0%); 4) improve staff professionalism, empathy, and kindness (13.5%); 5) increase support and information on how to provide care to the newborn (11.2%). Overall, 158 (16.4%) suggestions could not be classified in any WHO Standards, and among these most (72.1%) were related to physical structures, such as: decrease the number of patients per room; create areas for visitors; avoid case mixing in the same room; reduce rooming-in/better support the mother. Overall 62 (15.8%) women expressed appreciations. CONCLUSIONS Collecting the women's views on how to improve the QMNC after hospital delivery highlighted critical inputs on aspects of care that should be improved in the opinion of service-users. More investments should be made for establishing routine systems for monitoring patients experience of care. Data collected should be used to improve QMNC. WHO Standards may be further optimized by adding items emerging as relevant for women in high-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Chiara Semenzato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Jaspreet Kaur
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Giorgia Argentini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Via dell’Istria 65/1, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lazzerini M, Senanayake H, Mohamed R, Kaluarachchi A, Fernando R, Sakalasuriya A, Ihsan FR, Saravanabhava N, Gamaathige N, Jayawardane M, Gamage RV, Covi B, Wanzira H, Businelli C, Piccoli M. Implementation of an individual patient prospective database of hospital births in Sri Lanka and its use for improving quality of care. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e023706. [PMID: 30782885 PMCID: PMC6368149 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was aimed at piloting a prospective individual patient database on hospital deliveries in Colombo, Sri Lanka, and at exploring its use for developing recommendations for improving quality of care (QoC). DESIGN Observational study. SETTING De Soysa Maternity Hospital, the largest referral hospital for maternity care in Sri Lanka. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS From July 2015 to June 2017, 150 variables were collected for each delivery using a standardised form and entered into a database. Data were analysed every 8 months, and the results made available to local staff. Outcomes of the study included: technical problems; data completeness; data accuracy; key database findings; and use of data. RESULTS 7504 deliveries were recorded. No technical problem was reported. Data completeness exceeded that of other existing hospital recording systems. Less than 1% data were missing for maternal variables and less than 3% for newborn variables. Mistakes in data collection and entry occurred in 0.01% and 0.09% of maternal and newborn data, respectively. Key QoC indicators identified in comparison with international standards were: relatively low maternal mortality (0.053%); relatively high maternal near-miss cases (3.4%); high rate of induction of labour (24.6%), caesarean section (30.0%) and episiotomy (56.1%); relatively high rate of preterm births (9.4%); low birthweight rate (16.5%); stillbirth (0.97%); and of total deaths in newborn (1.98%). Based on key indicators identified, a list of recommendations was developed, including the use checklists to standardise case management, training, clinical audits and more information for patients. A list of lessons learnt with the implementation of the data collection system was also drawn. CONCLUSIONS The study shows that the implemented system of data collection can produce a large quantity of reliable information. Most importantly, this experience provides an example on how database findings can be used for discussing hospital practices, identifying gaps and to agree on recommendations for improving QoC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Hematha Senanayake
- University Obstetrics Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Rishard Mohamed
- University Obstetrics Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Athula Kaluarachchi
- University Obstetrics Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Roshini Fernando
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Anshumalie Sakalasuriya
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Fathima Reshma Ihsan
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Nalin Gamaathige
- Neonatology Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Madura Jayawardane
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Humphrey Wanzira
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Caterina Businelli
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Monica Piccoli
- WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Senanayake H, Piccoli M, Valente EP, Businelli C, Mohamed R, Fernando R, Sakalasuriya A, Ihsan FR, Covi B, Wanzira H, Lazzerini M. Implementation of the WHO manual for Robson classification: an example from Sri Lanka using a local database for developing quality improvement recommendations. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027317. [PMID: 30782951 PMCID: PMC6411254 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed at describing the use of a prospective database on hospital deliveries for analysing caesarean section (CS) practices according to the WHO manual for Robson classification, and for developing recommendations for improving the quality of care (QoC). DESIGN Observational study. SETTING University Obstetric Unit at De Soysa Hospital for Women, the largest maternity unit in Sri Lanka. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For each childbirth, 150 variables were routinely collected in a standardised form and entered into a database. Data were routinely monitored for ensuring quality. Information on deliveries occurring from July 2015 to June 2017 were analysed according the WHO Robson classification manual. Findings were discussed internally to develop quality improvement recommendations. RESULTS 7504 women delivered in the hospital during the study period and at least one maternal or fetal pathological condition was reported in 2845 (37.9%). The CS rate was 30.0%, with 11.9% CS being performed prelabour. According to the Robson classification, Group 3 and Group 1 were the most represented groups (27.0% and 23.1% of population, respectively). The major contributors to the CS rate were group 5 (29.6%), group 1 (14.0%), group 2a (13.3%) and group 10 (11.5%). The most commonly reported indications for CS included abnormal cardiotocography/suspected fetal distress, past CS and failed progress of labour or failed induction. These suggested the need for further discussion on CS practices. Overall, 18 recommendations were agreed on. Besides updating protocols and hands-on training, activities agreed on included monitoring and supervision, criterion-based audits, risk management meetings and appropriate information for patients, and recommendations to further improve the quality of data. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an example on how the WHO manual for Robson classification can be used in an action-oriented manner for developing recommendations for improving the QoC, and the quality of data collected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemantha Senanayake
- University Obstetrics Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Monica Piccoli
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Caterina Businelli
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Rishard Mohamed
- University Obstetrics Unit, De Soysa Hospital for Women, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Roshini Fernando
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Anshumalie Sakalasuriya
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Fathima Reshma Ihsan
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Humphrey Wanzira
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Semenzato C, Ciuch M. Use of WHO standards to improve quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a study collecting both mothers' and staff perspective in a tertiary care hospital in Italy. BMJ Open Qual 2019; 8:e000525. [PMID: 30997420 PMCID: PMC6440608 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background WHO developed a list of standards for improving maternal and newborn hospital care. However, there is little experience on their use, and no precise guidance on their implementation. This study aimed at documenting the use of the WHO standards for improving the quality of maternal and neonatal care (QMNC) in a tertiary hospital, Northeast Italy. Methods The study was conducted between May 2016 and May 2018, in three phases: phase I—sensitisation and training of health professionals; phase II—data collection on the WHO standards through a survey among service users and providers; phase III—based on the findings of phase II, development of recommendations for improving the QMNC. Results Overall, 101 health professionals were successfully trained. 1050 mothers and 105 hospital staff participated in the survey. Key indicators of QMNC (and related prevalence) from the mothers survey included: caesarean section (23.1%); episiotomy (18.3%); restrictions to free movements during labour (46.5%), lithotomy position for staff choice (69.3%); skin to skin (80.8%); early breast feeding (67.2%); information on newborn danger signs (47.2%); high satisfaction with QMNC (68.8%). Only 1.2% and 0.7% of women respectively reported discrimination or abuse. Key indicators (and prevalence) reported from staff included: availability of clinical protocols (37%); regular training (14%); health information system used for quality improvement (16.3%); training on effective communication (9.7%) and on emotional support (19.6%); protocols to prevent mistreatment and abuse (6.9%). On several indicators, the opinions of mothers on QMNC was better than those of staff. Overall, 55 quality improvement recommendations were agreed. Conclusions Information on the WHO standards can be collected from both services users and providers and can be proactively used for planning improvements on QMNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Chiara Semenzato
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Margherita Ciuch
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lazzerini M, Ciuch M, Rusconi S, Covi B. Facilitators and barriers to the effective implementation of the individual maternal near-miss case reviews in low/middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021281. [PMID: 29961025 PMCID: PMC6042547 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Revised: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The maternal near-miss cases review (NMCR), a type of clinical audit, proved to be effective in improving quality of care and decreasing maternal mortality in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). However, challenges in its implementation have been described. OBJECTIVES Synthesising the evidence on facilitators and barriers to the effective implementation of NMCR in LMICs. DESIGN Systematic review of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, LILACS, Global Health Library, SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, Cochrane library and Embase were searched in December 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Qualitative studies exploring facilitators and/or barriers of implementing NMCR in LMIC were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers extracted data, performed thematic analysis and assessed risk of bias. RESULTS Out of 25 361 papers retrieved, 9 studies from Benin, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cote D'Ivoire, Ghana, Malawi, Morocco, Tanzania, Uganda could be included in the review. The most frequently reported barriers to NMCR implementation were the following: absence of national guidelines and local protocols; insufficient training on how to perform the audit; lack of leadership, coordination, monitoring and supervision; lack of resources and work overload; fear of blame and punishment; poor knowledge of evidenced-based medicine; hierarchical differences among staff and poor understating of the benefits of the NMCR. Major facilitators to NMCR implementation included: good leadership and coordination; training of all key staff; a good cultural environment; clear staff's perception on the benefits of conducting audit; patient empowerment and the availability of external support. CONCLUSIONS In planning the NMCR implementation in LMICs, policy-makers should consider actions to prevent and mitigate common challenges to successful NMCR implementation. Future studies should aim at documenting facilitators and barriers to NMCR outside the African Region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Margherita Ciuch
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Silvia Rusconi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Klobassa DS, Zoehrer B, Paulke-Korinek M, Gruber-Sedlmayr U, Pfurtscheller K, Strenger V, Sonnleitner A, Kerbl R, Ausserer B, Arocker W, Kaulfersch W, Hausberger B, Covi B, Eitelberger F, Vécsei A, Simma B, Birnbacher R, Kurz H, Zwiauer K, Weghuber D, Heuberger S, Quehenberger F, Kollaritsch H, Zenz W. The burden of pneumococcal meningitis in Austrian children between 2001 and 2008. Eur J Pediatr 2014; 173:871-8. [PMID: 24419336 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-013-2260-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2013] [Revised: 12/10/2013] [Accepted: 12/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The present study was conducted to evaluate the burden of pneumococcal meningitis in Austrian children between 2001 and 2008. Clinical outcome was retrospectively analyzed both on discharge and on follow-up investigations. This study was based on a prospective multicentre surveillance study on hospitalized invasive pneumococcal infections in Austrian children with a total annual "study population" of about 399,000 children aged below 5 years per year. Between 2001 and 2008, 74 cases of pneumococcal meningitis were identified in children aged below 5 years. The mean annual incidence rate for pneumococcal meningitis was 2.3 per 100,000 children in this age group. In 57/74 children (mean age on admission 14.5 ± 13.3 months), outcome data on hospital discharge were available: 5 deaths (8.8%), 20 children (35.1%) with sequelae and 32 children (56.1%) without sequelae were observed. Sequelae on discharge included motor impairment in 8 children (14.0%), hearing impairment in 9 children (15.8%) and/or other complications in 14 children (24.6%). In 7/8 children with motor deficits, matching cerebral lesions were identified by neuroimaging: cerebral infarction in five children, cerebral vasculitis and cerebral abscess in one child each. In 40/57 children, long-term outcome (18.9 ± 20.2 months after discharge) could be assessed: 1 child (2.5%) died 9 months after hospital discharge, 11 children (27.5%) had one or two long-term sequelae and 28 children (70.0%) had no sequelae. Long-term sequelae included motor impairment in three children (7.5%), hearing impairment in nine children (22.5%) and other deficits in two children (5.0%). CONCLUSION Our study confirms that pneumococcal meningitis causes high mortality and severe long-term sequelae. On long-term follow-up, we observed improvements of motor impairment, but not of hearing impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Klobassa
- Department of General Paediatrics, University Clinic of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sölder B, Allerberger F, Covi B, Maurer K, Scheminzky C, Kreczy A, Schön G, Dierich MP. [Cat scratch disease caused by Bartonella henselae]. Immun Infekt 1995; 23:228-31. [PMID: 8582740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Bartonella henselae is an etiologic agent of cat-scratch disease and, in immunocompromised patients, of bacillary angiomatosis and other severe syndromes. Cat-scratch disease usually presents as lymphadenopathy, which resolves spontaneously within 2-4 months. The utility of antibiotic therapy remains controversial. In Tyrol four cases of human cat-scratch disease were diagnosed in children in 1994, yielding a prevalence of 0.7/100,000 per year. A 3-year-old boy had lymphadenitis coli since one year despite antituberculosis therapy which was initiated because of the histopathological picture and a positive tuberculin reaction (despite negative mycobacteria-cultures and -PCR). Two girls, age 9 and 13 years, had lymphadenitis at upper or lower extremities after cat-scratches from kittens. A 13-year-old boy presented with febrile illness and right hip pain, computer tomography revealed an osteolytic lesion; symptoms subsided within 3 weeks. Diagnosis of cat-scratch disease is based on cat contact, negative studies for other similar diseases, characteristic histopathologic features (if available), and results of an indirect immunofluorescence test (antigen: Houston-1 isolate, ATCC 49882). We believe that the availability of this serological test will increase the number of diagnosed cases of human Bartonella henselae infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Sölder
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde, Universität Innsbruck
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
We report a case of Noonan syndrome associated with pulmonary stenosis and major lymphedema of the lower extremities. At the age of 15 yr spontaneous chylothorax with increasing dyspnea occurred> Chest-x-ray demonstrated increased interstitial markings restricted to the right lower lobe representing pulmonary lymphangiectasia. The chylothorax did not respond to repeated thoracocentesis and medium-chain-triglyceride diet. When a chest tube was inserted and total parenteral nutrition was supplied, the chylous effusion decreased within 32 days. The patient is still on diet and asymptomatic effusion remained during 12 months follow up. In conclusion, pulmonary lympgangiectasia should be considered in patients with Noonan syndrome and an abnormal interstitial pulmonary pattern similar to pulmonary congestion (without any hemodynamic abnormalities). In case of pleural effusion, chylothorax should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sailer
- Universitätsklinik für Kinderheilkunde Innsbruck
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Steichen-Gersdorf E, Gassner I, Covi B, Fischer H. Oral-facial-digital syndrome II. Transitional type between Mohr and Majewski syndrome: report of a new case with congenital stenosis of the trachea. Clin Dysmorphol 1994; 3:245-50. [PMID: 7981861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
We present a female patient with laryngeal anomalies, tracheostenosis and pre- and postaxial polydactyly. Bilateral duplication of the hallux, polydactyly of hands, growth retardation and conductive hearing defect are consistent with oral-facial-digital (OFD) type II syndrome. Three similar cases of OFD syndrome with hypoplasia of the larynx, epiglottis and/or trachea without tibial dysplasia have been previously reported by Silengo and Temtamy and McKusick. The present patient adds one more case to this group of variants of OFD syndrome. We believe that those cases may be considered to form a separate subentity of OFD syndromes although overlapping features within the different subtypes make a precise classification very difficult.
Collapse
|