Needs of patients with parkinsonism and their caregivers: a protocol for the PRIME-UK cross-sectional study

Lessons learned for pandemic preparedness in the neurodegenerative research and clinical fields: an advice report based on Parkinson's disease as an example

BACKGROUND

A sustainable pandemic preparedness strategy is essential to ensure equitable access to healthcare for individuals with neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, it is vital to provide clinicians and researchers in the neurodegenerative disease fields with resources and infrastructure to ensure continuity of their work during a (health) crisis.

METHODS

We established an international collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and patient representatives from the Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom. We co-created a pandemic preparedness plan primarily informed by examples from those affected by or working in the field of Parkinson's disease, with potential application to other neurodegenerative diseases or the general population. This plan builds upon insights and experiences from four population-based studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Between March and November 2023, we organised two hybrid meetings in Bristol (United Kingdom) and Rotterdam (the Netherlands), and two online meetings.

RESULTS

Research recommendations included three core factors in questionnaire design during health crises: 1) using existing, validated questions, 2) questionnaire adaptability and flexibility, and 3) testing within and outside the research group. Additionally, we addressed burden of participation, and we advocated for robust data sharing practices, underlining the importance of regulatory measures extending beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. We also shared clinical perspectives, including strategies to mitigate social isolation; challenges in virtual versus in-person consultations; and systemic changes to recognise and prevent moral injury in healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSION

In this pandemic preparedness plan, we provide research and clinical recommendations tailored to the field of Parkinson's disease, with broader relevance to other neurodegenerative diseases and the general population. This establishes an essential framework for setting up new studies and safeguarding research and clinical practices when a new pandemic or other (health) crisis emerges.

Enhancing recruitment of individuals living with frailty, multimorbidity and cognitive impairment to Parkinson's research: experiences from the PRIME-UK cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

People with parkinsonism who are older, living in a care home, with frailty, multimorbidity or impaired capacity to consent are under-represented in research, limiting its generalisability. We aimed to evaluate more inclusive recruitment strategies.

METHODS

From one UK centre, we invited people with parkinsonism to participate in a cross-sectional study. Postal invitations were followed by telephone reminders and additional support to facilitate participation. Personal consultees provided information on the views regarding research participation of adults with impaired capacity. These approaches were evaluated: (i) using external data from the Parkinson's Real World Impact assesSMent (PRISM) study and Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a sample of all cases in UK primary care, and (ii) comparing those recruited with or without intensive engagement.

RESULTS

We approached 1,032 eligible patients, of whom 542 (53%) consented and 477 (46%) returned questionnaires. The gender ratio in PRIME-UK (65% male) closely matched CPRD (61% male), unlike in the PRISM sample (46%). Mean age of PRIME participants was 75.9 (SD 8.5) years, compared to 75.3 (9.5) and 65.4 (8.9) years for CPRD and PRISM, respectively. More intensive engagement enhanced recruitment of women (13.3%; 95% CI 3.8, 22.9%; P = 0.005), care home residents (6.2%; 1.1, 11.2%; P = 0.004), patients diagnosed with atypical parkinsonism (13.7%; 5.4, 19.9%; P < 0.001), and those with a higher frailty score (mean score 0.2, 0.1, 0.2; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These recruitment strategies resulted in a less biased and more representative sample, with greater inclusion of older people with more complex parkinsonism.

Working with public contributors in Parkinson's research: What were the changes, benefits and learnings? A critical reflection from the researcher and public contributor perspective

INTRODUCTION

This paper provides a critical reflection from both the researcher and public contributor (PC) perspective on the benefits and the learnings taken from involving PCs in research related to Parkinson's. APPROACH TO PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT (PPI): This paper reports on how PCs shaped the design and development of the PRIME-UK research programme study materials through input into information leaflets, consent forms and other patient-facing documents used across three studies within the PRIME-UK research programme. The PRIME-UK research programme is designed to improve the quality of life of people with Parkinson's and this project included three studies: a cross-sectional study, a randomised control trial and a qualitative study. We captured these impacts using Public Involvement Impact Logs, which provide a framework allowing researchers and PCs to report on the learnings, immediate outcomes and impacts from PPI. For this project, the impact logs enabled us to provide reflections from PCs and researchers on the process of involving 'the public' in Parkinson's research.

FINDINGS

This paper builds on existing evidence of the range of benefits and challenges that emerge from working with patients and the public in Parkinson's research; this includes reflecting on the changes made to the study materials and benefits for the people involved. Four themes emerged from the reflections that were common to the researchers and PCs; these were the importance of providing a supportive environment; recognition of the benefit of the evaluation of the impact of PPI; acknowledgement that engagement of PPI can make a positive difference to the research process and that timely communication and the use of face-to-face communication, where available, is key. Furthermore, we demonstrate how impact logs provide a useful and straightforward tool for evaluating public involvement practices and supporting the feedback process.

CONCLUSION

We offer key recommendations for involving patients and the public in Parkinson's research and suggest approaches that could be implemented to capture the impacts of public involvement.

PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Public contributors (PCs) were involved in the design and development of the participant information leaflets, consent forms and other patient-facing documents used for studies within the PRIME-UK research programme. In addition, PCs evaluated their involvement using impact logs and co-authored this paper.