1
|
Browne B, Ali K, Ford E, Tabet N. Determinants of hospital readmissions in older people with dementia: a narrative review. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:336. [PMID: 38609878 PMCID: PMC11015733 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04905-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over 50% of hospitalised older people with dementia have multimorbidity, and are at an increased risk of hospital readmissions within 30 days of their discharge. Between 20-40% of these readmissions may be preventable. Current research focuses on the physical causes of hospital readmissions. However, older people with dementia have additional psychosocial factors that are likely to increase their risk of readmissions. This narrative review aimed to identify psychosocial determinants of hospital readmissions, within the context of known physical factors. METHODS Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychInfo were searched from inception until July 2022 and followed up in February 2024. Quantitative and qualitative studies in English including adults aged 65 years and over with dementia, their care workers and informal carers were considered if they investigated hospital readmissions. An inductive approach was adopted to map the determinants of readmissions. Identified themes were described as narrative categories. RESULTS Seventeen studies including 7,194,878 participants met our inclusion criteria from a total of 6369 articles. Sixteen quantitative studies included observational cohort and randomised controlled trial designs, and one study was qualitative. Ten studies were based in the USA, and one study each from Taiwan, Australia, Canada, Sweden, Japan, Denmark, and The Netherlands. Large hospital and insurance records provided data on over 2 million patients in one American study. Physical determinants included reduced mobility and accumulation of long-term conditions. Psychosocial determinants included inadequate hospital discharge planning, limited interdisciplinary collaboration, socioeconomic inequalities among ethnic minorities, and behavioural and psychological symptoms. Other important psychosocial factors such as loneliness, poverty and mental well-being, were not included in the studies. CONCLUSION Poorly defined roles and responsibilities of health and social care professionals and poor communication during care transitions, increase the risk of readmission in older people with dementia. These identified psychosocial determinants are likely to significantly contribute to readmissions. However, future research should focus on the understanding of the interaction between a host of psychosocial and physical determinants, and multidisciplinary interventions across care settings to reduce hospital readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bria Browne
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, The University of Sussex Brighton, Brighton, UK.
| | - Khalid Ali
- Department of Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- Department of Elderly Care and Stroke Medicine, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Elizabeth Ford
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Naji Tabet
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, The University of Sussex Brighton, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caprioli T, Mason S, Tetlow H, Reilly S, Giebel C. Exploring the views and the use of information and communication technologies to access post-diagnostic support by people living with dementia and unpaid carers: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health 2023; 27:2329-2345. [PMID: 37029635 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2196246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review examined how information communication technologies (ICT) has been used to access remote post-diagnostic support that address the needs people with dementia, or those of dyad, and explored care recipients' views on accessing support remotely. METHOD Concepts relating to dementia and ICT were searched across six databases (PsychInfo, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Social Care Online, and Web of Science) in March 2021 and updated in March 2022. Studies published from 1990 and written in English, German or French were considered for inclusion. Methodological quality was appraised using the Hawker quality assessment tool and reporting structured according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS The search yielded 8,485 citations. Following the removal of duplicates and screening processes, 18 papers reporting on 17 studies were included. Studies described a range of post-diagnostic support, including medical follow-ups and therapeutic sessions, and were often delivered on a one-to-one basis via videoconferencing software. Whilst often relying on assistance from unpaid carers, people with dementia directly engaged with ICT to access post-diagnostic support in 13 studies. Accessing post-diagnostic support remotely appears feasible, nevertheless, care recipients' views were mixed. Access was frequently facilitated by supplying devices and providing ongoing technological support. CONCLUSIONS Accessing post-diagnostic support remotely is likely to benefit some care recipients, however, to prevent widening inequalities in access, services within the current hybrid landscape need to accommodate to people who are digitally excluded. Future research should capture the support provided by unpaid carers to facilitate the engagement of people with dementia to remote post-diagnostic support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs Caprioli
- NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen Mason
- Palliative Care Unit, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Siobhan Reilly
- Bradford Dementia Group, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Clarissa Giebel
- NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gridley K. Standardised data collection from people with dementia over the telephone: A qualitative study of the experience of DETERMIND programme researchers in a pandemic. DEMENTIA 2023; 22:1718-1737. [PMID: 37495232 PMCID: PMC10372513 DOI: 10.1177/14713012231190585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
There is a notable lack of evidence on what constitutes good practice in remote quantitative data collection from research participants with dementia. During the COVID-19 pandemic face-to-face research became problematic, especially where participants were older and more at risk of infection. The DETERMIND-C19 study, a large cohort study of people with dementia, switched to telephone data collection over this period. This paper explores the experiences of researchers who collected quantitative data over the telephone from people with dementia during the first COVID-19 lockdowns in England. The aim was to learn from these experiences, share insights and inform future research practice across disciplines. Seven DETERMIND researchers were interviewed about the processes and challenges of collecting quantitative data from people with dementia over the telephone compared to face-to-face. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two themes were developed: first the telephone adds an extra layer of confusion to an already cognitively complex interaction. Second, researchers found it difficult to recognise subtle cues that signalled participants' rising emotion over the telephone in time to prevent distress. The researchers employed strategies to support participants which may not have conformed to the strict conventions of structured interviewing, but which were informed by person-oriented principles. Whilst in practice this may be a common approach to balancing the needs of participants and the requirements of quantitative research, it is rare for studies to openly discuss such trade-offs in the literature. Honest, reflective reporting is required if the practice of remote data collection from people with dementia is to progress ethically and with integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Gridley
- Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eastham C, Mansell W, Sutton C, Prior Y, Keady J, Shields G, Riley C, Bowker G, Sylvestre Y, Morris L. Protocol of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of Empowered Conversations: training family carers to enhance their relationships and communication with people living with dementia. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:36. [PMID: 37881464 PMCID: PMC10593329 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13441.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Communication difficulties can cause frustration, low mood, and stress for people living with dementia and their carer. Carers should be offered training on adapting their communication skills. However, it is not common for skills-based education to examine emotional aspects of care and the effect of dementia on relationships. The Empowered Conversations (EC) training course was developed in response to a gap in service provision and has been adapted to a virtual format (Zoom). It addresses the specific psychological, relationship, and communication needs of informal and family dementia carers. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the feasibility of conducting a multi-centre randomised controlled evaluation trial of EC. Secondary aims include exploring the acceptability of delivering the intervention online and examining the optimum way of establishing cost-effectiveness. Methods The feasibility trial uses a pragmatic data-collector blind parallel two-group RCT design with two arms (EC intervention plus treatment as usual, and treatment as usual waitlist control). There will be a 2:1 allocation in favour of the EC-training intervention arm. 75 participants will complete baseline outcome measures exploring their role as a carer, including their physical and mental health, attitudes to caring, quality of life, and use of health and social care services. These will be repeated after six-months. Participants allocated to the treatment group who complete the course will be invited to participate in a qualitative interview discussing their experience of EC. Conclusions The study will investigate recruitment pathways (including facilitators and barriers to recruitment), estimate retention levels and response rates to questionnaires, obtain additional evidence regarding proof of concept, and consider the most appropriate primary outcome measures and methods for evaluating cost-effectiveness. The results of the feasibility study will be used to inform the development of a multicentre randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom. Registration ISRCTN15261686 (02/03/2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassie Eastham
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, England, M25 3BL, UK
| | - Warren Mansell
- Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, 6102, Australia
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Chris Sutton
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Yeliz Prior
- University of Salford, Salford, England, M5 4WT, UK
| | - John Keady
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Gemma Shields
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Cathy Riley
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, England, M25 3BL, UK
| | - Gail Bowker
- Independent Researcher, Manchester, England, UK
| | | | - Lydia Morris
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harding E, Rossi-Harries S, Gerritzen EV, Zimmerman N, Hoare Z, Proctor D, Brotherhood E, Crutch S, Suárez-González A. "I felt like I had been put on the shelf and forgotten about" - lasting lessons about the impact of COVID-19 on people affected by rarer dementias. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:392. [PMID: 37370011 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03992-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The public health measures imposed in many countries to contain the spread of COVID-19 resulted in significant suspensions in the provision of support and care for people with dementia. The negative effects of these measures have been extensively reported. However, little is known about the specific impact on people with young onset, non-memory-led and inherited dementias. This group may have experienced different challenges compared to those with late onset dementia given their non-memory phenotypes and younger age. We explored the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on people living with familial Alzheimer's disease, behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, familial frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, posterior cortical atrophy and primary progressive aphasia and their carers in the UK and their self-reported strategies for coping. METHODS This was a mixed methods study. An online survey was administered to people with dementia and family carers recruited via Rare Dementia Support. Free-text responses were analysed using framework analysis to identify key issues and themes. RESULTS 184 carers and 24 people with dementia completed the survey. Overall, people with dementia experienced worsening of cognitive symptoms (70%), ability to do things (62%), well-being (57%) and changes to medication (26%) during lockdown. Carers reported a reduction in the support they received (55%) which impacted their own mental health negatively. Qualitative analysis of free-text responses shed light on how the disruption to routines, changes to roles and responsibilities, and widespread disconnection from friends, family and health and social care support varied according to phenotype. These impacts were exacerbated by a more general sense that precious time was being lost, given the progressive nature of dementia. Despite significant challenges, respondents demonstrated resilience and resourcefulness in reporting unexpected positives and strategies for adapting to confinement. CONCLUSIONS This study has highlighted the specific impacts of the COVID-19 restrictions on people with young onset, non-memory-led and inherited dementias, including behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia and posterior cortical atrophy, and their carers. The specific challenges faced according to diagnosis and the self-reported strategies speak to the importance of - and may inform the development of - tailored support for these underrepresented groups more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Sam Rossi-Harries
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Esther Vera Gerritzen
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nikki Zimmerman
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- NWORTH Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Danielle Proctor
- Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, UCL, London, UK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Sebastian Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Aida Suárez-González
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moniz-Cook E, Mountain G. The memory clinic and psychosocial intervention: Translating past promise into current practices. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2023; 4:1052244. [PMID: 37214129 PMCID: PMC10192709 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1052244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Disproportionate negative effects since the pandemic have amplified the already limited post-diagnostic support for older people with dementia. This paper summarizes an exploratory randomized controlled study of a proactive family-based intervention compared with "usual" post-diagnostic dementia care. Memory clinic practitioners collaborated with the family doctor (GP) to coordinate this. At 12-month follow-up, positive effects on mood, behavior, carer coping and maintenance of care at home were found. Current approaches to deliver post-diagnostic support in primary care may require rethinking since (i) GP workloads have increased with low numbers of GPs per head of population in parts of England; and (ii) unlike many other long-term conditions, ongoing stigma, fear and uncertainty associated with dementia adds to the huge complexity of timely care provision. There is a case for return to a "one-stop facility", with a single pathway of continuing multidisciplinary coordinated care for older people with dementia and families. Future longitudinal research could compare structured post-diagnostic psychosocial intervention coordinated by skilled practitioners in a single locality memory service "hub", against other approaches such support organized mostly within primary care. Dementia-specific instruments for outcome measurement are available for use in routine practice, and should be included in such comparative studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esme Moniz-Cook
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Gail Mountain
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Perach R, Read S, Hicks B, Harris PR, Rusted J, Brayne C, Dangoor M, Miles E, Dixon J, Robinson L, Thomas A, Banerjee S. Predictors of loneliness during the Covid-19 pandemic in people with dementia and their carers in England: findings from the DETERMIND-C19 study. Aging Ment Health 2023; 27:521-532. [PMID: 35658781 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2080179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify factors that predict the risk of loneliness for people with dementia and carers during a pandemic. METHODS People with dementia and their carers completed assessments before (July 2019-March 2020; 206 dyads) and after (July-October 2020) the first Covid-19 'lockdown' in England. At follow-up, the analytic sample comprised 67 people with dementia and 108 carers. We built a longitudinal path model with loneliness as an observed outcome. Carer type and social contacts at both measurements were considered. Other social resources (quality of relationship, formal day activities), wellbeing (anxiety, psychological wellbeing) and cognitive impairment were measured with initial level and change using latent growth curves. We adjusted for socio-demographic factors and health at baseline. RESULTS In carers, higher levels of loneliness were directly associated with non-spouse coresident carer type, level and increase of anxiety in carer, more formal day activities, and higher cognitive impairment in the person with dementia. In people with dementia, non-spouse coresident carer type, and higher initial levels of social resources, wellbeing, and cognitive impairment predicted the changes in these factors; this produced indirect effects on social contacts and loneliness. CONCLUSION Loneliness in the Covid-19 pandemic appears to be shaped by different mechanisms for people with dementia and their carers. The results suggest that carers of those with dementia may prioritize providing care that protects the person with dementia from loneliness at the cost of experiencing loneliness themselves. Directions for the promotion of adaptive social care during the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rotem Perach
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Sanna Read
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Ben Hicks
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Peter R Harris
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Carol Brayne
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Margaret Dangoor
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eleanor Miles
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Josie Dixon
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Alan Thomas
- Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Sube Banerjee
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.,Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Richardson CD, Roscoe H, Green E, Brooks R, Barnes L, Matthews FE, Brayne C. Impact of COVID-19 policies on perceptions of loneliness in people aged 75 years and over in the cognitive function and aging study (CFAS II). J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:463-473. [PMID: 36370425 PMCID: PMC9877735 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic and associated social distancing measures have profoundly impacted society and social contact patterns, with older people disproportionately affected. Concerns have been raised about a resulting pandemic of loneliness in older people, although the current evidence is mixed. This study provides a unique perspective on the prevalence of loneliness in a population cohort of older people before the pandemic, followed up after the introduction of social restrictions. METHODS Data analysis was conducted using Wave 3 of the longitudinal Cognitive Function and Aging Study II (2018-2019) and a sub-study focusing on experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020). The sample comprised 379 adults aged over 75 living in Cambridge, Newcastle, and Nottingham. Multivariable binary logistic regression was conducted to identify correlates of prevalent loneliness, adjusted for confounding covariates, during the pandemic. The prevalence of loneliness during the pandemic was compared to loneliness in 2018-2019. RESULTS Prevalence of loneliness in this sample during the pandemic was 25.1% (95% CI 20.9%-29.7%) compared to 17.2% (95% CI 13.7%-21.3%) in 2018-2019 (χ2 = 14.1, p < 0.01). Variables associated with increased odds of prevalent loneliness included: prior loneliness, living alone, female gender, living in an area of higher deprivation, frequent pre-pandemic social contact at community groups, and separation from family during the pandemic, adjusted for age and sex. Weekly technology-mediated contact using telephone or video calls was associated with lower odds of loneliness. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 recovery plans should address loneliness in older people. Target groups should include those who have previously been lonely, people who live alone, those living in deprived areas, and those who had previously been socially active through community groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor D. Richardson
- Population Health Sciences InstituteNewcastle University, Newcastle Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and VitalityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Hannah Roscoe
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustSt Helens, MerseysideUK
| | - Emma Green
- University of Cambridge, Department of Public Health & Primary CareStrangeways Research Laboratory, Worts CausewayCambridgeUK
| | - Racheal Brooks
- University of Cambridge, Department of Public Health & Primary CareStrangeways Research Laboratory, Worts CausewayCambridgeUK
| | - Linda Barnes
- University of Cambridge, Department of Public Health & Primary CareStrangeways Research Laboratory, Worts CausewayCambridgeUK
| | - Fiona E. Matthews
- Population Health Sciences InstituteNewcastle University, Newcastle Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and VitalityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Carol Brayne
- University of Cambridge, Department of Public Health & Primary CareStrangeways Research Laboratory, Worts CausewayCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bamford C, Wilcock J, Brunskill G, Wheatley A, Harrison Dening K, Manthorpe J, Allan L, Banerjee S, Booi L, Griffiths S, Rait G, Walters K, Robinson L. Improving primary care based post-diagnostic support for people living with dementia and carers: Developing a complex intervention using the Theory of Change. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283818. [PMID: 37134099 PMCID: PMC10155958 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need to improve support following a diagnosis of dementia is widely recognised, but it is unclear how this can best be achieved within UK health and social care systems. A task-shared and task-shifted approach has been recommended, but there is limited guidance on how to achieve this in practice. As part of a programme of research, we developed an intervention to enhance the role of primary care in post-diagnostic care and support for people living with dementia and carers. METHODS We used the Theory of Change to develop a complex intervention informed by initial literature reviews and qualitative work. The intervention was developed through an iterative series of workshops, meetings and task groups with a range of stakeholders, including the multidisciplinary project team, people living with dementia and carers, service managers, frontline practitioners, and commissioners. RESULTS 142 participants contributed to intervention development through face-to-face or virtual meetings. The intervention comprises three complementary strands of work focusing on: developing systems, delivering tailored care and support, and building capacity and capability. Clinical dementia leads, based in primary care networks, will facilitate the intervention providing tailored expertise and support. CONCLUSION The Theory of Change proved useful in providing structure and engaging stakeholders. The process was challenging, took longer and was less participative than intended due to restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We will next conduct a feasibility and implementation study to explore whether the intervention can be successfully delivered within primary care. If successful, the intervention offers practical strategies for delivering a task-shared and task-shifted approach to post-diagnostic support that could be adapted for similar health and social care contexts internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Bamford
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Wilcock
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Greta Brunskill
- Voluntary Organisations Network North East, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Wheatley
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, The Policy Institute at King's, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Allan
- South Cloisters, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Sube Banerjee
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Booi
- Centre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Griffiths
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|