Time trends in contraceptive prescribing in UK primary care 2000-2018: a repeated cross-sectional study

Trends in different contraception methods among women attending the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre from 2011 to 2020

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and availability of contraception have changed in the last several decades; however, unintended pregnancies continue to be an issue in Australia. This study aimed to describe trends in contraception in women attending a sexual health service over 9 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Repeated cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Women aged 16-49 years attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between 2011 and 2020 were included. Women were asked what methods of contraception they currently use. Contraception were categorised into long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; e.g. intrauterine devices and implants classified as highly effective), moderately effective contraception (e.g. oral contraception pill), less effective contraception (e.g. condom and withdrawal) and no contraception, as defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the factors associated with the use of moderate-high-efficacy contraception.

RESULTS

A total of 38,288 women were included with a median age of 25 (interquartile range: 22-29). Between 2011 and 2020, there was a decreasing trend in condom (63.3%-56.1%; Ptrend <0.001) and oral contraception (27.2%-20.5%; Ptrend <0.001) use, whilst there was an increasing trend in the use of LARCs: implant (4.6%-6.0%; Ptrend = 0.002) and intrauterine device (2.8%-11.8%; Ptrend <0.001). Increasing age was associated with decreased odds of using moderate-high-efficacy contraception (Ptrend <0.001). Compared with Oceanian-born women, Asian (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.72) and Middle Eastern-born women (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.74) had lower odds of using moderate-high-efficacy contraception, whilst European (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI:1.07-1.41) and North American-born women (aOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.22-1.87) had higher odds of using moderate-high-efficacy contraception.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2011 and 2020, LARC use has increased, whilst less effective contraceptives, such as condom and oral contraception, have decreased among women at Melbourne Sexual Health Centre. Further research is required to understand age and ethnic disparities in contraception methods for future family planning programmes.

Depression risk in users of different doses of levonorgestrel intrauterine systems: a nationwide prospective cohort study

Background

Use of the high-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has been associated with increased risk of incident depression. Evidence is lacking on the influence of use of two recently marketed low-dose LNG-IUS on risk of depression. This study aims to examine associations between use of different doses of LNG-IUS and risk of depression.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide prospective cohort study involving all first-time users of an LNG-IUS among all Danish nulliparous women aged 15-34 years with no medical history of depression, major psychiatric diseases, endometriosis, heavy menstrual bleeding, polyp, myoma, dysmenorrhoea, iron supplement use, abortion, and infertility treatment.

Findings

A total of 46,565 first-time users of LNG-IUS were followed for 80,516 person-years with 1,531 incident initiations of antidepressant use observed during follow-up. Use of the high-dose LNG-IUS containing 52 mg levonorgestrel was initiated by 9,902 (21%) women, while 20,665 (44%), and 15,998 (34%) initiated use of the low-dose LNG-IUS containing 19·5 mg and 13·5 mg levonorgestrel, respectively.The age-, calendar-time-, and education-standardised incidence rates of first-time depression per 1,000 person-years at full LNG-IUS duration were 30.8 (95% CI 23·6-39·5) for the 52 mg LNG-IUS, 19·8 (95% CI 16·1; 24·0) for the 19·5 mg LNG-IUS, and 17·7 (95% CI 14·4-21·5) for the 13·5 mg LNG-IUS-. Compared to the high-dose 52 mg LNG-IUS, the adjusted number of avoided depressions per 1,000 person-years were 11·0 (95% CI 7·1-14·9) for the 19·5 mg LNG-IUS and 13·1 (95% CI 9·6-16·6) for the 13·5 mg LNG-IUS. The corresponding adjusted rate ratios were 0·77 (95% CI 0·68; 0·88) and 0·85 (95% CI 0·75-0·96). The reduced risk of depression with low-dose LNG-IUS compared to high-dose LNG-IUS was observable throughout duration of use.

Interpretation

Use of low-dose LNG-IUS containing 19·5 mg and 13·5 mg levonorgestrel, respectively, were associated with a reduced risk of incident depression compared to use of the high-dose 52 mg LNG-IUS. The study suggests that low-dose LNG-IUS should be preferred over the high-dose LNG-IUS for contraceptive purpose.

Funding

Sygeforsikringen "Danmark" grant: 2021-0128.

Association of oral contraceptive pill use and depression among US women

BACKGROUND

The link between oral contraceptive pill (OCP) and depression is still unclear. This work analyses the prevalence and correlates of major depression in US women using OCP.

METHODS

This study used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2012 data to provide the prevalence and correlates of major depression in women using OCP. Major depression was defined as a score of ≥10 using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

RESULTS

A total of 6239 women aged 18-55 years were included in the present analysis. Current OCP users had a lower prevalence of major depression (4.6 %; 95 % CI, 3.2 to 6.6) compared to former users of OCP (11.4 %; 95 % CI, 10.1 to 12.9) and never users of OCP (10 %; 95 % CI, 8.3 to 12.1). Current users of OCP were significantly less likely to report major depression compared to former users of OCP (OR 0.59; 95CI%, 0.39 to 0.90) after adjusting for potential confounders. The prevalence of major depression was higher in women who were: black or Hispanic, widowed/divorced/separated, those with a low and middle income, current smokers, current users of antidepressants, and with history of cancer and thyroid problems.

LIMITATIONS

This is a cross-sectional study.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of major depression among women using OCP may be lower than in former users of OCP, however, the burden of depression remains high. Further research with longitudinal follow-up for depression in women using OCP is needed to understand real world effect of the OCP on depression.

Understanding barriers to using long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are highly effective. In primary care, LARCs are prescribed less frequently than user-dependent contraceptives despite higher efficacy rates. Unplanned pregnancies are rising in the UK, and LARCs may have a role in reducing these through and redressing inequitable contraceptive access. To provide contraceptive services that offer maximal choice and patient benefit, we must understand what contraception users and healthcare professionals (HCPs) think about LARCs and uncover barriers to their use.

METHODS

A systematic search using CINAHL, MEDLINE via Ovid, PsycINFO, Web of Science and EMBASE identified research about LARC use for pregnancy prevention in primary care. The approach adhered to the 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' methodology, critically appraised the literature, and used NVivo software to organise data and perform thematic analysis to determine key themes.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Three themes were identified: (1) trustworthiness (where and from whom participants obtained information regarding LARCs), (2) control (whether LARCs detract from personal autonomy) and (3) systems (how HCPs influenced LARC access). Misgivings about LARCs frequently arose from social networks and fears of surrendering control over fertility were prominent. HCPs perceived access issues and lack of familiarity or training as the main barriers to prescribing LARCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care plays a key role in improving access to LARC but barriers need to be addressed especially those involving misconception and misinformation. Access to LARC removal services are key to empower choice and prevent coercion. Facilitating trust within patient-centred contraceptive consult is essential.

DCIS and LCIS: Are the Risk Factors for Developing In Situ Breast Cancer Different?

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is widely accepted as a precursor of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is considered a risk factor for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), and it is unclear whether LCIS is also a precursor. Therefore, it would be expected that similar risk factors predispose to both DCIS and IDC, but not necessarily LCIS and ILC. This study examined associations with risk factors using data from 3075 DCIS cases, 338 LCIS cases, and 1584 controls aged 35-60, recruited from the UK-based GLACIER and ICICLE case-control studies between 2007 and 2012. Analysis showed that breastfeeding in parous women was protective against DCIS and LCIS, which is consistent with research on invasive breast cancer (IBC). Additionally, long-term use of HRT in post-menopausal women increased the risk of DCIS and LCIS, with a stronger association in LCIS, similar to the association with ILC. Contrary to findings with IBC, parity and the number of births were not protective against DCIS or LCIS, while oral contraceptives showed an unexpected protective effect. These findings suggest both similarities and differences in risk factors for DCIS and LCIS compared to IBC and that there may be justification for increased breast surveillance in post-menopausal women taking long-term HRT.

Exploring the interface between adolescent dysmenorrhoea and endometriosis: a protocol for a cohort and nested case-control study within the QResearch Database

INTRODUCTION

Dysmenorrhoea affects up to 70%-91% of adolescents who menstruate, with approximately one-third experiencing severe symptoms with impacts on education, work and leisure. Dysmenorrhoea can occur without identifiable pathology, but can indicate underlying conditions, including congenital genital tract anomalies or endometriosis. There is a need for evidence about the management and incidence of dysmenorrhoea in primary care, the impact of treatments in adolescence on long-term outcomes and when to consider the possibility of endometriosis in adolescence.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study aims to improve the evidence base for adolescents presenting to primary care with dysmenorrhoea. It comprises three interlinked studies. Using the QResearch Database, the study population includes all female at birth participants aged 10-19 years any time between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2021. We will undertake (1) a descriptive study documenting the prevalence of coded dysmenorrhoea in primary care, stratified by demographic variables, reported using descriptive statistics; (2) a prospective open cohort study following an index cohort of all adolescents recorded as attending primary care with dysmenorrhoea and a comparator cohort of five times as many who have not, to determine the HR for a diagnosis of endometriosis, adenomyosis, ongoing menstrual pain or subfertility (considered singly and in combination) anytime during the study period; and (3) a nested case-control study for adolescents diagnosed with endometriosis, using conditional logistic regression, to determine the OR for symptom(s) preceding this diagnosis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The project has been independently peer reviewed and received ethics approval from the QResearch Scientific Board (reference OX46 under REC 18/EM/0400).In addition to publication in peer-reviewed academic journals, we will use the combined findings to generate a resource and infographic to support shared decision-making about dysmenorrhoea in community health settings. Additionally, the findings will be used to inform a subsequent qualitative study, exploring adolescents' experiences of menstrual pain.

[Worldwide contraception]

The latest statistics concerning contraceptive use in the world have been published in 2019 by the United Nations. Among the 1.9 billion of women of reproductive age (15-49 years), 1.1 billion have a need for family planning. Among them, 190 millions are not using any contraception, although they wanted to avoid a pregnancy. There is a significant discrepancy among continents concerning the percentage of contraceptive use and the distribution of the different types of contraception. Female sterilization is the most widespread method of contraception since it represents 24% of all contraception methods used. Male condoms is used by 21% of couples. Thus, progress is still needed to disseminate effective, well tolerated and potentially reversible methods of contraception. Education of females, couples, medical and paramedical staff is one of the priority targets to improve contraception throughout the world.